cRPG

cRPG => Game Admin Feedback => Topic started by: Smoothrich on October 04, 2011, 12:56:52 am

Title: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on October 04, 2011, 12:56:52 am
Free TF2 hats courtesy of Goatee to all those who vote

Ban Goatee
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on October 04, 2011, 12:57:46 am
badmin
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zorato on October 04, 2011, 12:58:26 am
gay
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Classical on October 04, 2011, 01:00:51 am
I like how funny threads like this are funny, anyway, I am gay.

 • He is gay.

I'd call him a badmin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: farthammer on October 04, 2011, 01:21:45 am
I happen to quite like this admin, and would enjoy a nice butt-rubbing game of siege with him
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: kukufarikki on October 04, 2011, 03:41:54 am
reasonable with bans, doesn't go all tears of destiny or nuffen on people
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Digglez on October 04, 2011, 05:57:06 am
Smoothrich is ok, but allows too much goonish bullshit from his own clan before they're kicked.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on October 04, 2011, 06:33:36 am
Pretty gay imo
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Damug on October 04, 2011, 06:39:01 am
He's the gayest.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 04, 2011, 01:35:59 pm
This thread has encouraged me to instead of warning on TS, giving kicks, and eventually banning LLJK trolls (Zealot, Bear)  I will 3 day ban you on sight at first offense, as if you were a bunch of Goatees.  Enjoy :D
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on October 04, 2011, 01:47:39 pm
This thread has encouraged me to instead of warning on TS, giving kicks, and eventually banning LLJK trolls (Zealot, Bear)  I will 3 day ban you on sight at first offense, as if you were a bunch of Goatees.  Enjoy :D

king gay
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zorato on October 04, 2011, 05:35:42 pm
This thread has encouraged me to instead of warning on TS, giving kicks, and eventually banning LLJK trolls (Zealot, Bear)  I will 3 day ban you on sight at first offense, as if you were a bunch of Goatees.  Enjoy :D

even gayer now
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: a_bear_irl on October 04, 2011, 05:37:01 pm
I love smoothrich and he is my favorite admin don't mute me
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Dach on November 05, 2011, 09:51:37 am
Bump! For the great post you just made in the server info!

Great admin!  :)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: ArysOakheart on November 06, 2011, 10:33:14 am
I would support you if you supported The Peasants.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Digglez on November 07, 2011, 01:51:05 am
It was either you or poop that banned all the retard peasants yesterday, thanks for getting rid of them.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Dasty on November 25, 2011, 07:02:37 am
Terrible admin... decided to turn off friendly banners for "better immersion" and TKed like 5 people in two rounds...
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 25, 2011, 07:09:43 am
As in he himself could not see them?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on November 25, 2011, 07:24:25 am
Terrible admin... decided to turn off friendly banners for "better immersion" and TKed like 5 people in two rounds...

He won the bet  :(
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on November 25, 2011, 07:36:34 am
Turning off faction banners is an in-game feature which I wanted to experiment with, to fully immerse myself into the perspective of a Heavy Cav on the Battlefield.  The stakes were high with each thrust, and it was a pretty interesting foray into a realism mode for Warband which would be great to add in on a server, like hardcore for Battlefield and stuff.

I don't even think I lost any rounds I had banners off, I just tk'd maybe 3-4 people over the course of one map, which is no different from most cavalry players as is.

Actually wouldn't a Hardcore Mode server be a fun idea?  No crosshairs, health bars, banners, or kill reports.  Just realistic brawls to the death.  I know how turning off banners was kind of douchey to do, and I tried to avoid teammates based on intuition as much as I could, but some teammates just had a menacing swagger and glare, and it so happened to be a few ATS in a row :(

All apologies friends.  I don't recommend turning banners off.. but it is kind of hilarious!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Earthdforce on November 25, 2011, 07:41:33 am
Tis a rather convenient excuse. How does one turn off banners?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oprah_winfrey on November 25, 2011, 07:45:52 am
Tis a rather convenient excuse. How does one turn off banners?

options>turn off friendly banners

Anyway, tking and furthermore intentional tking is an ingame feature, and yet that is a bannable offense.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on November 25, 2011, 07:52:00 am
I did not intentionally teamkill anyone.  I tried to effectively play with banners off on my local client, for the sake of my immersion.  There were a few tks that probably looked intentional, but were just tragic incidents of war, much as it must've been for noble mounted knights in the middle ages. 

There are explicitly no rules against playing with banners off, though it clearly disrupts the server a bit, and I don't plan on making it a habit, unless a server is ever set up specifically for it.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Earthdforce on November 25, 2011, 07:53:26 am
There's plenty of rules against friendly fire, and as an admin you should not be taking steps that could lead you to break the rules that you are to uphold.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zorato on November 25, 2011, 11:22:43 am
He did not intentionally TK. He was experimenting with a feature of the game for a few interesting rounds. Get it through your skull.

ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on November 25, 2011, 08:02:59 pm
Smoothrich is awesome.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on November 25, 2011, 09:25:44 pm
IF U WERE KILLED TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL
CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN DA MOTHA FUKER THAT KILLED U!

..._...|..____________________, ,
....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = = = D
...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//

WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
send this GUN to everyone you care about including me if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get 13 your A TRUE HOMIE
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: isatis on December 17, 2011, 07:27:27 pm
swaggy admin... would love to play with no faction banner.

also love the gun of poop so i'll quote it


..._...|..____________________, ,
....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = = = D
...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//



Title: Re: Unban request;Just got banned from NA_cRPG_1 for absolutely no reason
Post by: Cosmos_Shielder on December 23, 2011, 05:39:49 pm
ugh dude, protip, please use spaces and stuff, your posts are absolutely awful to read, and its much harder to get people's attention to help you with anything if you write everything in giant walls of text.

anyways since you're just a noob I'll lift your ban. I banned you because I did in fact warn you, twice, about the long spear, and everyone on the server started getting pretty mad at you, as you merrily respawned repeatedly to go long spear lance people on horseback, which yes, is considered exploiting.

please don't do it again
Nice decision.
He really seems to be a newbie. It would be great that chadz crew implement something for admin to be able to write Personnal Messages to people.
If this Newbie had a big message taking half of his screen :
 



DON'T USE LONG SPEAR ON HORSEBACK






He wouldn't have done it
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 09, 2012, 03:39:06 am
Worst admin I've ever seen, an LLJK is naked and running over the whole team every round, he refuses to do anything.  I shoot the TKer as hes riding me over and he bans me.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kiara on January 09, 2012, 03:41:52 am
Worst admin I've ever seen, an LLJK is naked and running over the whole team every round, he refuses to do anything.  I shoot the TKer as hes riding me over and he bans me.

Confirmed.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on January 09, 2012, 03:58:58 am
I warned the server twice about tk's at spawn.  A few rounds later, I saw you kill a cav at spawn, so I banned you.  I said report team wounding or griefing with I chat, but you didn't do that, so I didn't know there was a problem.  After someone confirmed his griefing, I banned him too.  Both of the bans were for 1 hour.  If there's a problem don't do "cRPG justice" and kill a guy because if an admin sees that he'll act accordingly.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Ubereem on January 14, 2012, 01:04:12 pm
thumbs down
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 18, 2012, 05:38:11 pm
I said report team wounding or griefing with I chat, but you didn't do that, so I didn't know there was a problem.

This did not happen.

I chatted multiple times they were griefing, like i said above, you did absolutely nothing for a multitude of rounds.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 18, 2012, 06:32:47 pm
This did not happen.

I chatted multiple times they were griefing, like i said above, you did absolutely nothing for a multitude of rounds.

So, i took the time to go through the logs...

(click to show/hide)

The whole day, you did not use the i chat to report anything to any admin.
Also you never named rloveution in chat, i did not cut any important lines out, just random chatter and kills.
You also should get the option to report friendly cav that bumps you, LLJK_rloveution never popped up in any report (possible that the bump reporting was added after the 8th, not sure.)
Plus the dude also got banned.

I do not really see a problem here since Smooth told you to report problems which you did not do in a proper why that would get his attention.

Next time just use the player2admin chat and tell the admin what exactly your problem is, odds are it will be handled before you rage and TK someone.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 18, 2012, 08:06:57 pm
Convenient that you didn't look at the logs before that first line.  I also find it impressive that you put "All Day" when I used "I" chat to point out when a cav was already trolling me on a previous map, who did get banned by a different admin.

My faith in admins just dropped a few notches.

EDIT: Also, in using your quick searching, I bet you didn't read through all the other players chat either.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 18, 2012, 08:32:05 pm
What i did is take the whole log, search for every line you said that was not a kill, then i filtered the whole log to only show chat and remove all kills.
Then i checked if at any point in time you used the i chat during that day where you connected to the server multiple times over some hours.

After that i filtered everything that was said by you or smooth so i have no random chatter from other players.
Then i cut the important part and pasted it here.

Thanks for assuming that i did not bother but i actually wasted a lot of time on this which i now regret.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 18, 2012, 09:05:27 pm
That's great and all except that I KNOW I used "I" chat.  I believe it was Tydeus who banned that guy earlier.  Yet you said "All Day".  And you missed my point, the whole team was talking about the cavalry in question for quite some time during all that.  But you didn't see that.

Many people were complaining about the cavalry that was running us over, Smoothrich (who is cav), didn't care at all.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 18, 2012, 10:24:58 pm
Here is all chat that involved you or your name on that day, knock yourself out.
I also marked my favorite part of it.

Player2Admin chat would btw. look like this and was never used by you:
00:54:46 - [PLAYER2ADMIN][USA_WINSTON_CHURCHILL_USA] HE TKED ME ON PURPOSE
00:54:47 - [PLAYER2ADMIN][USA_WINSTON_CHURCHILL_USA] BAN HE

Except that the text the person writes is usually not capitalized ;)

(click to show/hide)

My point btw. wasn't to proof that the cav bumping did not happen but to make sure everyone is aware that this:
This did not happen.

I chatted multiple times they were griefing, like i said above, you did absolutely nothing for a multitude of rounds.

Is just a lie as this was the only thing i could find you saying about this thing at all:
Quote
19:23:27 - *DEAD* [Silveredge] Theres only a problem when some people attack a horse, but theres no problem for armored horses to run over the entire team AMIRITE? I never attacked a horse btw.
19:23:56 - *DEAD* [Silveredge] thats what i thought


Well besides the thing you said after you tked the guy i guess :mrgreen:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 18, 2012, 10:43:45 pm
Filter and show all chat from 20:25:00 - 20:35:00.

And show me that there aren't people bitching about getting ran over.  And Smoothrich is not responsive to it.
That is exactly what I'm referring to.

Not just filtering everything with "Silveredge" in it.  Filter the context.

Worst admin I've ever seen, an LLJK is naked and running over the whole team every round, he refuses to do anything.  I shoot the TKer as hes riding me over and he bans me.

EDIT: Actually, you could probably filter a bit further and see everyone probably getting pissed off that the offender wasn't banned and that I was.  THAT is the reason Smoothrich even did anything at all.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 18, 2012, 10:50:56 pm
Reread that last part of my post again.
Especially the part right after the spoiler.

I'll also just give you the log part you requested for that time to prove your point.
Again i marked my favorite part.
Only thing removed were kills and IDs:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 18, 2012, 11:04:47 pm
Here is all chat that involved you or your name on that day, knock yourself out.

My point btw. wasn't to proof that the cav bumping did not happen but to make sure everyone is aware that this:
Is just a lie as this was the only thing i could find you saying about this thing at all: 

Well besides the thing you said after you tked the guy i guess :mrgreen:

So you're saying your point is that: everything did happen, and people were complaining, I did chat to confirm the multiple grievances made by players.  Smoothrich didn't do anything at all to stop the trolling until he could troll himself, because another player took action.

Ok, I see.  Many thanks Meow.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 18, 2012, 11:07:09 pm
See above, added the log, also edited all IDs out of the previously posted logs just so you don't wonder why the edit time of all of them is basically right now.

Yes there was some rage, no there was no one telling smooth to ban the dude, then you raged and spawn killed him.

Next time use the Player2Admin chat to make sure the admin is actually aware of what is going on.

Also i will stop putting more time into this, just don't make claims like you talked to the admin in the admin chat when that is not the case, doesn't make you look trustworthy especially after i read all the logs of that day and saw those nice other rage TKs you did.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 18, 2012, 11:33:29 pm
I did not spawn kill him, I always use Tilde (~) at the beginning and throughout the round.  He turned off from the main group and was purposely running over as many people as he could, since I'm fast (Athletics) I was way out in front of the team.  He ran me over, kept on running others over, then turned around again.  He came straight for me, I turned around, stopped, aimed my crossbow at him, and waited(obviously saying dont fucking run me over or I'll shoot you).  Since he was NAKED and trolling, my bolt I released RIGHT when he was running me over, 1 shot him (Before the patch).  By the way this was multiple times over a period of a few maps, the admin has to try not to see it, thats why everyone had such an outcry.

Quote
20:33:03 - [Fallen_Homey] he shot teamcav that was riding directly at him to run him over AGAIN

There was a lot of bitching.  It occurs to me that its not exactly apparent to a casual gazer, and I suppose the admins that are put in power may not actually pay attention to the game or whats happening.  When you see "kick" "stop" "goddamn cav" "fucking stop you bundle of sticks" over a couple of maps you might have to have it spelled out since they may not have been involved in the game they are administering.

I will lower my expectations and use "I" chat accordingly.  Use proper grammar that would make sense to someone who is not playing the game.  Like an admin...in the game.

EDIT: By the way, I don't know if you didn't understand me but I said I did use admin chat that day.  Since you put it in the context of 'I didn't use it at all that entire day'.  Again, I used admin chat to complain about another troll earlier.  Which Tydeus banned.  I did not mean that I used admin chat to Smoothrich.  I still don't see why admin chat had to be used in the situation where multiple people are complaining in normal chat.  And he was saying "report" which nobody could do because it wasn't added.  I even believe that we said that earlier in the log!  It was pretty ridiculous.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 19, 2012, 12:13:04 am
There is not a single instance of you using the player2admin chat over the whole day to any admin as i said before.

Yes the admin chat is exactly for that purpose, to make admins aware of stuff they miss.
I do not see how it is lowering your expectations when you support the admins...but everyone his own i guess.
Actually when ever something comes up that needs admin attention, use it and report that so every admin on the server can have an eye on it.

If you want admins who do not play but watch the servers, feel free to pay us.

Else use the given options instead of TKing someone and then being pissed you get banned.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Silveredge on January 19, 2012, 12:38:10 am
I did use admin chat.  Of that I'm 100% sure.  The instance I'm referring to may have been in a previous session and for that I apologize, this is an old topic.  I did not say I didn't want admins to play.  I can play and see what's going on in chat, that's what I'm referring to.  The admin in this topic is Smoothrich, when you say "us", in what I'm talking about, an Admin and a Developer are not the same.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on January 19, 2012, 01:40:16 am
Well, i'm speaking from an admin perspective here, i also mainly started spamming Smooth's thread cause i was checking logs at the time anyway, then stumbled upon your post and felt like replying.

Being an Admin can be a really annoying thing to do and you totally need player support to keep track of everything going on.
It's way different reading the random chit chat and filtering the stuff that is really important.
Even worse on a horse i guess, not playing cav so i can't judge.
Smooth is one of the few really active admins and i kinda doubt he was intentionally ignoring the problem.
You always get crap when you do anything at least from the people who get muted/kicked/banned as it is always abuse and badmining.

Anyhow, you guys wouldn't want to lose him as admin right now, there are way too few and even less this active.

Support your local admins :mrgreen:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on January 20, 2012, 07:55:51 pm
A good admin, regardless of what the crybabies say.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Noctivagant on January 27, 2012, 12:34:05 pm
Irc spammer
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on January 27, 2012, 01:04:16 pm
Good admin, responses to problems really fast
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Scrambles720 on January 31, 2012, 07:50:50 pm
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,24935.0.html

I saw goretooth playing a day after this. Who unbanned him? Not saying your a bad admin or anything i just want to know who unbanned him and why. He clearly stated "I thought it was funny" which sure as hell isn't learning his lesson. If I missed something I am sorry. I don't know where else to post this other than the admin who banned him and likely unbanned him's thread if im in the wrong spot just delete the comment and pm me.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on January 31, 2012, 09:31:45 pm
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,24935.0.html

I saw goretooth playing a day after this.

He is banned on NA officials only, it was not a Global ban.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on January 31, 2012, 10:56:23 pm
Goretooth had his ban extended but was unbanned (by me) and got on rageball for a brief time in between before I extended it on the website.

His ban (ended up being 4-5 days) is over now though, so watch your backs :(
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Goretooth on February 01, 2012, 12:04:27 am
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,24935.0.html

I saw goretooth playing a day after this. Who unbanned him? Not saying your a bad admin or anything i just want to know who unbanned him and why. He clearly stated "I thought it was funny" which sure as hell isn't learning his lesson. If I missed something I am sorry. I don't know where else to post this other than the admin who banned him and likely unbanned him's thread if im in the wrong spot just delete the comment and pm me.
You know who why would you post in the right one? a 5 day ban for a few tks. Not that i play much. How you all been enjoying strat btw?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkwulf on February 01, 2012, 12:24:49 am
Sounds like Smooth is doing his job fine. 
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Scrambles720 on February 01, 2012, 04:36:18 am
Your first sentence needs some revision goretooth because I truly don't have a clue what you meant. And it wasn't originally a five day ban. Also I personally am enjoying strat and i know we wont be seeing much lljk anymore so thats fine with me :) I never hated lljk we just fought to have fun and enjoy strat but i love how you try to turn it personal goretooth :p You don't take the game very seriously for someone who takes the game so seriously. Sorry for off topic now back to the topic.

Smoothrich is a fair admin and he explained the situation fast and nicely. Like this guy and his administrative style
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on February 17, 2012, 02:34:15 am
Smooth plays the heavy when no one else is willing to.

An unsung hero
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Miracle on February 17, 2012, 02:38:47 am
The only thing smooth could improve is to release a diss song with every ban handed out.  That would make him bestmin, imo.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on March 03, 2012, 07:49:16 pm
His buddy BADPLAYER tramples and shoots me with a crossbow. Then says "Im not even sorry". I TK him, and get perma banned by Smooth. How many people did your friend TK to finish the map with 2/6 as a crossbow calv? Your friend acts like a child, and you foolishly defend him. Double standards are garbage too. If im banned for TKing, you should have banned him too. Would of been 100% avoided if he didnt talk shit after nearly killing me. You are a terrible admin, your polls support the notion too.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on March 03, 2012, 07:55:58 pm
His buddy BADPLAYER tramples and shoots me with a crossbow. Then says "Im not even sorry". I TK him, and get perma banned by Smooth. How many people did your friend TK to finish the map with 2/6 as a crossbow calv? Your friend acts like a child, and you foolishly defend him. Double standards are garbage too. If im banned for TKing, you should have banned him too. Would of been 100% avoided if he didnt talk shit after nearly killing me. You are a terrible admin, your polls support the notion too.

Big deal, ive done the same thing jokingly after accidentally lancing or bumping someone, doesnt give them the right to come after me (note: revenge teamkilling/wounding is against the rules as well)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 03, 2012, 07:56:59 pm
Perhaps you meant to post your unban request for willful, documented intentional teamkilling reported by multiple witnesses and screenshotted in the proper section of the forums?

This was on the community servers by the way, that have oldschool permabans only available.  Though I imagine shift banning still works for temp bans, but I forgot that function because I haven't had to ban anyone on that server until today.

Its not like he intentionally hit you either, he tried to save you when you 1vs1d me and bumped you by accident, then I killed you.  You proceeded to threaten to TK him out of spite and revenge, then did at spawn the very next round.  Where did I make a bad decision here again?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on March 03, 2012, 08:00:18 pm
His buddy BADPLAYER tramples and shoots me with a crossbow. Then says "Im not even sorry". I TK him, and get perma banned by Smooth. How many people did your friend TK to finish the map with 2/6 as a crossbow calv? Your friend acts like a child, and you foolishly defend him. Double standards are garbage too. If im banned for TKing, you should have banned him too. Would of been 100% avoided if he didnt talk shit after nearly killing me. You are a terrible admin, your polls support the notion too.

Hey pubtrash before you start saying shit maybe make sure you don't lie? you were 1v1ing Smoothrich so he can vouch for this, when I went to bump him to help you and you moved in the way instead so I bumped you accidently, I was gonna say sorry but you reported me so when I died I said "not even sorry". I didn't shoot you once with my crossbow nerd.


Here are some screenshots of you threatening to TK me, and then next round actually TKing me.

(click to show/hide)

I especially like how you tried to shoot me with a crossbow and missed. Scrublord.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on March 03, 2012, 08:08:48 pm
also i'm gonna talk shit to you every time I kill you (tk or otherwise).

deal with it
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on March 03, 2012, 08:29:34 pm
Pubtrash..... Who was in a 1v1 that got ran over by a teamate and killed? That would be me. Who ran me over? That would be you, pubtrash. I think you are confused about what trash means(you are xbow cav scoring 2/6, lol). Second, no where what so ever did I deny killing you. In fact, it blantantly says I did if you could evaluate what you read. Guessing you are indeed retarded.

I have 0 problem with team bumps and kills, even when im having a 1v1. But when you are the sole reason I die AND you run your mouth afterwards I have a big problem with it.

And yes....badplayer forgot how to use temp ban......how many people have you banned? How long have you been playing? Right...

You are both trash and cant deal with losing.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 03, 2012, 08:34:47 pm
look at this idiot, get out of my thread you scrub, you got banned because you teamkilled like some sort of raging manchild then came to my thread to lie about it completely and distort the picture to frame me as abusive, btw the policy of the server is 1 week for intentional teamkilling so enjoy your ban, i'm sure everyone else will
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on March 03, 2012, 08:39:21 pm
Pubtrash..... Who was in a 1v1 that got ran over by a teamate and killed? That would be me. Who ran me over? That would be you, pubtrash. I think you are confused about what trash means(you are xbow cav scoring 2/6, lol). Second, no where what so ever did I deny killing you. In fact, it blantantly says I did if you could evaluate what you read. Guessing you are indeed retarded.

I have 0 problem with team bumps and kills, even when im having a 1v1. But when you are the sole reason I die AND you run your mouth afterwards I have a big problem with it.

And yes....badplayer forgot how to use temp ban......how many people have you banned? How long have you been playing? Right...

You are both trash and cant deal with losing.

no you died because you got in the way of my horse when I went to bump the enemy, it was completely your fault because you are Bad At This Game, maybe you should play some single player it seems more to your skill level. pubtrash.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on March 03, 2012, 09:19:16 pm
no you died because you got in the way of my horse when I went to bump the enemy, it was completely your fault because you are Bad At This Game, maybe you should play some single player it seems more to your skill level. pubtrash.

This really doesnt justify as intent? Where are the senior admins?
-Admits to running me over when I was blatantly in a 1v1
-Admits to talking shit to me after doing so
-Repeatedly talks shit
-Is friends with the admin that banned me "In steam i asked him..."

Once again you went 2/6 as xbow calv. lol. Please call me bad more, baddie.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on March 03, 2012, 09:51:49 pm
PUBTRASH
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 03, 2012, 10:27:09 pm
Where are the senior admins?

Easy to spot, just look for them on EU and with 5 pips not 3 on the forums.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Adrian on March 04, 2012, 12:00:09 am
Horrible Admin, kicks and bans as favors for friends. Only admin thus far that Is so horrible I actually took time to provide feedback for. Not only a terrible admin, but he is a complete drain on the NA community itself. I still question how the hell he was even selected to be admin on the NA servers.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 04, 2012, 12:18:39 am
^^  mad that i said his clan leader was being a jerk for taking looms in a scam scandal thread, proceeded to find any thread mentioning me in it to belittle my elite lancer cav/rap battle skills, and is now turning to my admin thread for petty revenge

funny i'm pretty sure i've banned more LLJK then from any other clan, in fact i have an active ban for a_bear_irl right now for teamkilling (who pleaded me not to ban him like a pathetic child), please cite me some examples of this favouritism behaviour, i honestly don't really know who you are and have never seen you in game so for all i know you aren't an active player to begin with

sure i troll these forums sometimes and don't hesitate to talk smack in game when i feel like it like a normal player but i don't ban people for no reason or abuse powers, pretty much every complaint in this thread was some bandwagoning attempt by mad pubbies (like this crazyi clown) or people's clanmates that i banned for justified reasons.  any attempt to actually throw some evidence at me for wrongfully using admin has actually been checked and verified in logs and what do you know, i warn people when they break rules then proceed to kick and/or ban with good judgement, and i keep the servers teamkilling/griefing/exploiting free, as is the job of an admin.  I have no sanctimonious pretensions about the position or my personality and don't act holier than thou to anybody, i treat people as they should be treated.  in your case adrian, its like a moody teenager who takes videogames way too seriously.  nice avatar btw brah, was that picture at your junior prom?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 12:23:24 am
please cite me some examples of this favouritism behaviour
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 04, 2012, 12:45:28 am
shrug

I banned goretooth for a couple days, and the same day as a Strat battle I decided to unban some ATS players (that i'm not friendly with at all) and Goretooth, all bans I did, a day or so early because I felt the bans were long enough for what they did, at my discretion.  Goretooth was later rebanned for an even longer time to appease the ban gods because some people complained that he should've been banned for longer, and I ended up agreeing and extended the ban significantly.  Discussed that issue in this thread actually a couple pages ago.  Glad to see you still have such strong, dare I say, sanctimonious, opinions about this kind of stuff Tears.  Thought you got over it when you resigned (after spamming multiple threads about me being an awful person, Frank Grimes style).

So that's something for sure though, and it was fine to be brought up in this thread, which it was when it happened (notice that the guy who complained ended up saying I was a good admin and reasonable person after I talked to him).  Any times like this Adrian guy said that I banned or kicked other people as a troll or to benefit myself or my internet knight friends?  Things that would actually you know, ruin the game for other people by me abusing admin.  Pretty much every complaint in this thread is from some mad idiot that I banned for justifiable reasons or their clan mates.  The rest is because I'm LLJK.  Color me impressed.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LLJK_Goatee on March 04, 2012, 12:56:49 am
Smooth is a known drug user and homo-sexual please remove his admin and give it to me a straight laced young republican.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 12:57:12 am
shrug

Glad to see you still have such strong, dare I say, sanctimonious, opinions about this kind of stuff Tears.

I was not aware that I worded such things in a strong manner, nor did I say any word of having a superior position. That was certainly not my intention nor my line of thinking. Thank you for the two paragraph response though, very in depth and detailed.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Goretooth on March 04, 2012, 01:09:16 am
  • Unbanned someone for a strat battle.
He has a name.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Inequity on March 04, 2012, 01:09:49 am
I was not aware that I worded such things in a strong manner, nor did I say any word of having a superior position. That was certainly not my intention nor my line of thinking. Thank you for the two paragraph response though, very in depth and detailed.

Why do you have a plastic lawn chair in your room?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 01:12:19 am
Why do you have a plastic lawn chair in your room?

Congratulations for making me actually turn around in real life and look.

I don't.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LLJK_Goatee on March 04, 2012, 01:39:09 am
Smooth has entered our TS several times high as a kite cackling about how is is gonna abuse his admin and bans anyone who try to reason with him. Stop this druggie deviant! Think of the children that play!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: a_bear_irl on March 04, 2012, 01:41:22 am
smootherich is a giant bundle of sticks!!!!! he banned me for breaking a single shield! smoothrch has a grudge against me, please deadmin him right now!!!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Inequity on March 04, 2012, 01:43:23 am
Smoothrich once banned a man for 3 weeks for being afk.  He was trying to save his newborn child from a fire, and once notified of this, smooth still refused to unban him, as he really hates leechers.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 04, 2012, 03:41:38 am
 :|

come on
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TurmoilTom on March 04, 2012, 03:43:20 am
go zorato

a+ post would read again
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Inequity on March 04, 2012, 03:44:37 am
Removed

i endorse this post
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 03:51:20 am
I find it remarkable that you managed to find those ancient photos of me of when I was... 19?

Also, that is not my room.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 04, 2012, 04:07:19 am
I find it remarkable that you managed to find those ancient photos of me of when I was... 19?

Also, that is not my room.
Stop lying about the lawn chair, you can clearly see it in the second picture with you in it. No wonder you lost admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 04:08:42 am
Stop lying about the lawn chair, you can clearly see it in the second picture with you in it. No wonder you lost admin.

Emphasis on "Not my room."

The room I am in does not, nor ever had, a lawnchair, neither have any of "my rooms."
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: a_bear_irl on March 04, 2012, 05:15:18 am
why are you denying the existence of a lawnchair everyone can see? the lawn chair is right there, tears, now tell us why you have lawnchairs inside of your "living space", those are for the lawn, not inside
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 05:39:19 am
I am not denying the existence of the lawn chair, I am denying that it is my room, or even the room that I am in right now.

It was not my lawn chair, it was not my room.

Notice every time I said "The room I am in" not "The room I was in" thus referring to the present and not the past for if there are any lawn chairs in the room that i am in this very split second.

There is a clear distinction between a chair and a room, should you care to look that up.

TL:DR
There was a lawn chair in the room that I was in for that photo. There is no lawn chair in the room I am currently in (nor has there ever been). The photo taken displays a lawn chair that is not mine, and is taken in a room that was not mine. English is hard?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 04, 2012, 06:17:35 am
I am not denying the existence of the lawn chair, I am denying that it is my room, or even the room that I am in right now.

It was not my lawn chair, it was not my room.

Notice every time I said "The room I am in" not "The room I was in" thus referring to the present and not the past for if there are any lawn chairs in the room that i am in this very split second.

There is a clear distinction between a chair and a room, should you care to look that up.

TL:DR
There was a lawn chair in the room that I was in for that photo. There is no lawn chair in the room I am currently in (nor has there ever been). The photo taken displays a lawn chair that is not mine, and is taken in a room that was not mine. English is hard?
Until you show me photographic evidence of you in your new room with no lawn chair in sight, you shall be labeled as an idiot for bringing your lawn chairs inside to sit on. As bear said in his post, and I quote:
now tell us why you have lawnchairs inside of your "living space", those are for the lawn, not inside

Just face the facts Tears. You either have a lawn chair in your room or you don't. We can't trust you without proper evidence to back up your claims. Your face must be visible in the photo so we know it is you. (You must also be holding up a post-it note that says Green Team for Life ~ToD)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 06:29:24 am
Fine, don't trust me and just assume that in the 5 or more years since that was taken, I have not moved an inch, and that everything in the background of every photo that I am in belongs to me and is my property.

Flimsy argument to obtain a picture of me.  :lol:

I shall just enjoy the attention that so many LLJK give me. Your obsession with me, while mildly creepy, is also lightly flattering. Thank you kindly.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: SuperNewb on March 04, 2012, 07:32:28 am
Fine, don't trust me and just assume that in the 5 or more years since that was taken, I have not moved an inch, and that everything in the background of every photo that I am in belongs to me and is my property.

Flimsy argument to obtain a picture of me.  :lol:

I shall just enjoy the attention that so many LLJK give me. Your obsession with me, while mildly creepy, is also lightly flattering. Thank you kindly.

So you still have the lawn chairs but in a different room now?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 04, 2012, 07:40:30 am
So you still have the lawn chairs but in a different room now?

The owner burned them for firewood and donated the proceeds to the local Children's Hospital before passing away.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on March 04, 2012, 07:51:45 am
Well at least it when for a good cause. Idk why everyone likes your that lawn chair so much Tears
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 04, 2012, 10:17:34 am
you always speak the truth, muki-san A_A
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Inequity on March 05, 2012, 10:10:53 pm
I am not denying the existence of the lawn chair, I am denying that it is my room, or even the room that I am in right now.

It was not my lawn chair, it was not my room.

Notice every time I said "The room I am in" not "The room I was in" thus referring to the present and not the past for if there are any lawn chairs in the room that i am in this very split second.

There is a clear distinction between a chair and a room, should you care to look that up.

TL:DR
There was a lawn chair in the room that I was in for that photo. There is no lawn chair in the room I am currently in (nor has there ever been). The photo taken displays a lawn chair that is not mine, and is taken in a room that was not mine. English is hard?

lol @ this post
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Freakshow on March 26, 2012, 03:42:47 am
I just witnessed this admin ban Inviti_Zaren for "poll abuse". Allers, being the troll that he is, was spamming chat. Zaren put up a poll to ban him. AFTER the poll was put up, Shadowren muted Allers. It was too late to cancel the poll. The poll went through, and Smoothrich banned Zaren for ONE DAY for "poll abuse" This is complete and utter bullshit and abuse, Smoothrich does not deserve to have admin if he behaves like this. I even saw some members from the other team agree that Allers deserved the 30 minute ban.

SMOOTHRICH = BADMIN
I have 50 people in this teamspeak that agree with me.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 26, 2012, 04:22:30 am
I just witnessed this admin ban Inviti_Zaren for "poll abuse". Allers, being the troll that he is, was spamming chat. Zaren put up a poll to ban him. AFTER the poll was put up, Shadowren muted Allers. It was too late to cancel the poll. The poll went through, and Smoothrich banned Zaren for ONE DAY for "poll abuse" This is complete and utter bullshit and abuse, Smoothrich does not deserve to have admin if he behaves like this. I even saw some members from the other team agree that Allers deserved the 30 minute ban.

SMOOTHRICH = BADMIN
I have 50 people in this teamspeak that agree with me.
Apparently you're incorrect and he submitted three(3) ban polls without contacting admins prior to doing so.

I am merely commenting based on what information I've received
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on March 26, 2012, 04:30:12 am
Smooth is good admin he was just mad at allers getting like 100 + kills
 I spammed gg just like everyone else did. We were under orders.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 26, 2012, 04:34:46 am
I reduced the ban to an hour much like allers recieved, just wanted him to post an unban appeal, though it turned out to be a troll thread, not really surprised at that though

Ban polling isn't necessary in that kind of situation, I considered it abuse of the poll system, no regrets
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Shadowren on March 26, 2012, 04:35:36 am
Smooth is good admin

Agreed

Apparently you're incorrect and he submitted three(3) ban polls without contacting admins prior to doing so.

It only happen once.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zaren on March 26, 2012, 04:39:35 am
Apparently you're incorrect and he submitted three(3) ban polls without contacting admins prior to doing so.

I am merely commenting based on what information I've received
(click to show/hide)
it was 1 poll and it passed with 59%. Not my fault people on his team 1nd it. Whoever gave you that info is blind or an idiot.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 26, 2012, 04:41:18 am
it was 1 poll and it passed with 59%. Not my fault people on his team 1nd it. Whoever gave you that info is blind or an idiot.
Have you ever thought that maybe I'm the idiot?

Thanks shadowren :)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 26, 2012, 05:23:35 am
Have you ever thought that maybe I'm the idiot?

Don't set yourself up like that...
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 26, 2012, 05:29:40 am
Don't set yourself up like that...
Simple truth is simple truth tears. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on March 26, 2012, 05:34:47 am
You had like 55% of the population in the server.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spartacus on March 26, 2012, 07:03:56 am
You had like 55% of the population in the server.
nope was 59%
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on March 26, 2012, 02:20:17 pm
nope was 59%

Did i say the poll passed with 59%? Or did i say you had 55% of the players in the server! Your team had majority rule in the server! Of course the opposite team will hit one. so it was a no win situation for allers.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Lemmy_Winks on March 26, 2012, 07:01:03 pm
From what I have seen so far (not taking into account the strat battle as i was not there) it seems that Smooth lacks the maturity and calm, unbiased attitude that is needed to be a good admin. Thats not to say that he cant change and get better but i kind of doubt it. 
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 26, 2012, 07:32:48 pm
Did i say the poll passed with 59%? Or did i say you had 55% of the players in the server! Your team had majority rule in the server! Of course the opposite team will hit one. so it was a no win situation for allers.

What you're saying is based under the assumption that everyone is going to vote to kick out an opposing player simply due to the fact that he is on the other team. Sorry, but this hardly ever happens. If it's one thing crpg players in game dont do, it's agree with one another. It's more likely that Allers was being annoying and obnoxious as usual and he pissed off enough people in this instance to get the poll passed. It's also worth noting that Allers and a few other people he plays with are pretty unpopular in general outside of their little circle of "z0rz0rz, nuuuu's, and laaaawls" It's not too hard to get poll kicked for being annoying when you already have a reputation for it.


That said, tiger would have been better off asking for administrative action to be taken in I chat before resorting to a poll, but yeah.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 26, 2012, 07:58:34 pm
yes its easy to ban poll people if people dislike them, even easier to get it to pass if the polled guy is top slot of a strat team and everyone on the other side votes 1 to get him banned off!  so lets just ban everyone we dislike because if enough people vote 1, it means we are right no matter what.  much like all of germany voting 1 for the holocaust, meaning it was the right thing to do.. right?

also the dude got banned for like half an hour as a point that ban polling people (let alone top of scoreboard players) in strat battles when plenty of admins on is abuse, and I believe admins will be making sure ban polls are off more often then not due to the maturity levels/decision making of people as a whole when it comes to using ban polls (nine times out of ten it is a rage poll or to grief)

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 26, 2012, 11:26:09 pm
Smoothrich is by far; at this point the worst, most biased, troll, wanna-be godly admin in cRPG. Known fact.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28482.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28482.0.html)

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28532.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28532.0.html)

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28585.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28585.0.html)

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28588.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28588.0.html)

Edit : This too - http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28696.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28696.0.html)

Oh and this is recent. Intentional TK http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28920.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28920.0.html)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 26, 2012, 11:37:36 pm
4 threads about a guy who posted a ban request, i fulfilled his ban request then asked him what he did to provoke the tk, and him and this guy flipped his shit for 2 days spamming threads and complaining that i was biased, even after I already banned the guy they wanted banned, was just asking for clarification

and i'm the troll
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 26, 2012, 11:47:43 pm
and i'm the troll

Correct. Much worse as well.

Also the poll is almost 50/50 for "Is this admin doing their job correctly?" 50/50 is actually extremely bad for an admin. Half of the community that actually puts time and effort into the forums thinks you are not doing your "job" correctly, that speaks enough to say that you should not be an admin; along with all of the negative posts in this thread alone.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 26, 2012, 11:50:49 pm
where was my biased decision making in the fact that i banned the guy who was screenshotted breaking rules, then inquired about why this crazyi guy was kicking teammates that provoked to a tk?  4 threads and i don't think either of you ever acknowledged that i actually FULFILLED HIS BAN REQUEST but was just asking questions when crazyi started acting like a jerk off?

where is the bias?  the griefing?  the abuse of admin?

99 percent of posts here are just mad nerd pubbies who got banned for rightful reasons then flip their shit calling bias when i can pour over my entire ban record and not see a single incident of me banning someone who didn't break a rule

come at me bros with actual criticism instead of empty shit posts of "heh lljk troll admin u suck lol"
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Shadowren on March 26, 2012, 11:51:11 pm
lol Don't you love your hate mail smoothrich :D

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 26, 2012, 11:56:14 pm
my admin feedback thread owns and my poll is hilariously close at all times i am truly a divisive and controversial figure

i have an attitude and i don't act like a sanctimonious saint because of my admin title but i'd like people to have actual substance to their claims of "abuse" because whether people believe it or not i have a steam friends list full of people who contact me to handle admin issues on the official servers, idle in the IRC to respond to admin requests, check the ban requests forum usually at least once a day, and respond to admin complaints in game

i don't really expect people to give a shit or feel anything but disdain because i am "notorious troll" but being an admin is a volunteer position i do solely to keep the server griefer free and help everyone enjoy the game.. I don't have some sort of meta troll/admin exploiting agenda
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 12:01:02 am
You don't need an agenda to clearly qualify you as a terrible admin, it is a known fact. And having a "hilariously close poll" (especially one that judges your character of the alleged position) is not a good thing. You sir, are more than contreversial and I do not to this day; understand why you are an admin. I truly do not.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2012, 12:02:10 am
go ahead emotion make a post right now explaining how my handling of the crazyi ban request thread was biased or abusive, i dare u
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 27, 2012, 12:09:13 am
i dare u

Shits about to get serious up in here
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 12:18:09 am
Sad, smooth. I am sorry, but the Admin you are WILL be seen by the majority of players soon enough. If you have to come onto the forums to DEFEND yourself majority of the time, you are doing something wrong. Eventually the community will see this, and I think you are afraid of that. Have a good day.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2012, 12:26:28 am
another dude called out on explaining with the logic and rationality that i use in all my decisions to explain their opinions, and unsurprisingly another dude who backs down

get on my level
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 12:47:56 am
lol.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on March 27, 2012, 01:00:08 am
Sad, smooth. I am sorry, but the Admin you are WILL be seen by the majority of players soon enough. If you have to come onto the forums to DEFEND yourself majority of the time, you are doing something wrong. Eventually the community will see this, and I think you are afraid of that. Have a good day.

america defends itself too

america defends freedom

smoothrich IS freedom

if you want smoothrich deadmined, you might as well deadmin america as well

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: isatis on March 27, 2012, 02:38:54 am
Simple truth is simple truth tears. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed.

isn't that from all stars?

just wondering...
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 27, 2012, 07:46:05 am
another dude called out on explaining with the logic and rationality that i use in all my decisions to explain their opinions, and unsurprisingly another dude who backs down

get on my level

Eventhough you are absolutely right, i think this illustrates why most people dislike Smooth. When they try and call him a bad admin he asks them to explain why, and when they can't he calls them out on it in less-than professional manner. But you know what? Being an in-game-admin in a mod community doesn't mean you have to act like you're the staff of blizzard or something. He gets the job done and that's all that matters. I don't think he is obligated to wipe the butts of his critics when they can't cite any evidence to back up their butt-hurt claims.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: ArysOakheart on March 27, 2012, 11:02:38 am
You're right Dark, it's unfortunate we all don't have this game linked through steam or have Fraps going all the time.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2012, 11:17:25 am
I'm not asking for hard evidence, just articulation.. something that most trolls are sadly lacking!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 27, 2012, 01:58:30 pm
You're right Dark, it's unfortunate we all don't have this game linked through steam or have Fraps going all the time.

There are other ways to take screenshots in mount and blade.

I'd suggest clicking control + insert next time. It's the in game mechanic for taking screenshots!  :)

Anyway, I just find it interesting. If so many people find him a bad admin (going by his poll votes), then why can't they provide hard evidence or at least decent elaboration. Smoothrich has made a wrong call her or there; I have, others have, most of us admins have. I just don't think that makes him a bad admin. If you all feel differently, it is up to you to prove or show why you feel that way.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Gricks on March 27, 2012, 04:12:31 pm
I don't know, yesterday night he was watching a massive tk fest then revenge tked someone. Had to ask like 1239812931 times for him to do something. A generally effective admin, but takes advantage of his admin status. On the fence.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 04:19:04 pm
Anyway, I just find it interesting. If so many people find him a bad admin (going by his poll votes), then why can't they provide hard evidence or at least decent elaboration. Smoothrich has made a wrong call her or there; I have, others have, most of us admins have. I just don't think that makes him a bad admin. If you all feel differently, it is up to you to prove or show why you feel that way.

Hmmm, I don't know Dark, maybe actually take a look at the posts in this thread and maybe actually click on the URL links, and read. Funny thing is if you click on the link it AUTOMATICALLY takes you to it. Crazy... right? Quit it with your empty posts, do some research if you want to be involved.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 04:20:32 pm
I don't know, yesterday night he was watching a massive tk fest then revenge tked someone. Had to ask like 1239812931 times for him to do something. A generally effective admin, but takes advantage of his admin status. On the fence.

Wait... Smoothrich revenge tk'd someone Gricks?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: RibaldRon on March 27, 2012, 06:09:48 pm
Hmmm, I don't know Dark, maybe actually take a look at the posts in this thread and maybe actually click on the URL links, and read. Funny thing is if you click on the link it AUTOMATICALLY takes you to it. Crazy... right? Quit it with your empty posts, do some research if you want to be involved.
You must be talking about the ban request thread where Smooth ended up getting your friend, the OP, banned for his vigilante behavior.

Your friend's thought process:
Oh yeah, I don't like this guy, I'ma go break the rules. WHAAAT HE JUST TK'D ME ?!?! BAN HE!!!!!!  :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


He deserved what he got.  He knew what he did was wrong, he may not have been punished if he had been honest with it.  Smoothrich didn't even make the final call, it was another unbiased (excuse me, BIASED, because obviously if nobody sides with you it's because they're biased.  :rolleyes:) admin who ultimately made that call.  You were too busy being a little child to see that.



Anyway, it's clear most of you don't like Smoothrich as a person but this is not what this thread is about.  Is he doing his job properly?  Yeah.  Should Admins be held to higher standards?  Absolutely.  Now, it's not Smooth's fault that you all set the bar incredibly low.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 06:22:39 pm
You must be talking about the ban request thread where Smooth ended up getting your friend, the OP, banned for his vigilante behavior.

Your friend's thought process:
Oh yeah, I don't like this guy, I'ma go break the rules. WHAAAT HE JUST TK'D ME ?!?! BAN HE!!!!!!  :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Ribald... are you slow? Did you even read the thread and maybe contemplate what it contained? I have no affiliation with either parties. I made that apparent in the very beginning. Please take the time to know what you are talking about before you come in here trying to defend YOUR friend. Thanks.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: KillerofFlowers on March 27, 2012, 06:23:34 pm
For the most part he can be a good admin and admins can't be perfect all the time. I'm admin on community and to me it gets annoying that I get called a badmin and rage threads get started about doing your job correctly. As far as a person smooth is from my point a view is a dick but he gets the job done... At least when I'm in the server with him. You also have to remember admins can't see everything.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 27, 2012, 06:44:14 pm
Hmmm, I don't know Dark, maybe actually take a look at the posts in this thread and maybe actually click on the URL links, and read. Funny thing is if you click on the link it AUTOMATICALLY takes you to it. Crazy... right? Quit it with your empty posts, do some research if you want to be involved.


My god, half of those threads essentially solved themselves. Kicking people is a pretty obvious griefing offense, as is being a vigilante. Did you even read those threads? Or did you just find every thread complaining about smoothrich that you could possibly find to try and make your erroneous, butt hurt point seem more valid?Smoothrich and other admins pretty much already refuted those posts. It's pretty clear that you're just sour. Also drop this condescending tone of yours, it's just further showing how much of a butt hurt cry baby you are being. YOU are the one that needs to do research, you're coming off just as wrong and butt hurt as you did when I administered my ban against you. Honestly, i've seen debates with more grace and civility on facebook statuses. I know your forum name is emotion, but quit letting yours dictate your posts so horribly. Guys like you are exactly why certain admins on here usually just roll their eyes and tell you to piss off when they are hit with such vitriolic responses. It's pretty obvious going by your previous posts that you have vendettas against most admins since they actually call you out and reprimand you for the childish bullshit you pull in game. Either follow your own advice and learn the rules of the server you are playing in, or go play on a different server or a different game.

Tl;Dr: Those threads were all horrible examples that pretty much don't go anywhere. Also,grow up Noodles. Guys like you are why most people outside of ATS goes in your vent anymore. You're being really childish(like usual).
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 07:20:54 pm
Thats funny that you say that, since I have never had any discussion with smoothrich outside of the forums, hence never in-game. I have only been "in trouble" once in-game and that was a while back; I've been playing since closed beta.  So don't try and change the topic at hand with useless information of outside sources that are completely irrelevant to this particular thread.

If you would like to bring anything irrelevant to this particular thread up, I believe the spam section is for you, since it is against the rules to post here about it. You, an admin should know this. Ill link it for you http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/board,10.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/board,10.0.html).
Please speak about the matter at hand for now on. Also, in the spam section if you plan to go ahead and post, bring some facts with you about the "childish, butt hurt, cry baby things I so called...did/do." Thanks Bud.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 27, 2012, 08:12:09 pm
The information presented was actually entirely relevant as it basically lays out why you are being so bitter and speaking against smooth and most other admins, since you clearly have no other/real reason to think he is a bad admin. As far as "relevant goes" I and other admins pretty much already dismantled your horrible little claims for why smoothrich is a bad admin.If you have anything else to add please feel free to do so(or just send a few angry PMs like you did last time) have a nice day!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2012, 08:58:04 pm
I don't know, yesterday night he was watching a massive tk fest then revenge tked someone. Had to ask like 1239812931 times for him to do something. A generally effective admin, but takes advantage of his admin status. On the fence.

My complaint now is.. I ban too slowly!  I have died a tragic amount of times on battle especially mid round regardless of my place on the scoreboard cuz I stop my character and look like I'm afk as I check logs, message witnesses on steam or teamspeak, scroll through the nonalphabetized list of players to actually find the damn person in the first place (this is a nightmare on a full server).  The TK's were first directed at a clan mate on siege which I told the offending party to stop, once he started attacking random players I banned him.

Emotion the point is all those threads with Crazyi look really stupid, Crazyi looks like a mad nerd who can't get over being banned on Community a month ago (for revenge tking at spawn) and all his and your posts in the threads are juvenile rants and blind, confused rage.  He was reprimanded by admins and by his clan for his actions and if you are actually on his side no one with a lick of sense is gonna take your opinion seriously (the admin team actually looked at those threads and found Crazyi then your posts to be really annoying, vindictive, and worthless) and if anything hurt your credibility way more than mine!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Ganner on March 27, 2012, 09:04:55 pm
I love how i got drawn in this just for moderating the forums BY THE RULES OF THE FORUM.

Also, ITT rulebreakers that dont like any authority figure and get ragey when they get caught.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on March 27, 2012, 09:28:29 pm
4 threads about a guy who posted a ban request, i fulfilled his ban request then asked him what he did to provoke the tk, and him and this guy flipped his shit for 2 days spamming threads and complaining that i was biased, even after I already banned the guy they wanted banned, was just asking for clarification

and i'm the troll
go ahead emotion make a post right now explaining how my handling of the crazyi ban request thread was biased or abusive, i dare u

Quote from: Smoothrich
shut up nerd

Quote from: Smoothrich
no1 cares, locking

Is this proof? You seem to resist logic so I will have to quote your own words.

You arguments are sound Smooth. You fulfilled my ban request AND THEN asked for the story? The first place you mention a ban for anyone....
Quote from: Smoothrich
Well I'll ban you both for 24 hours then, he has the chance to unban request, you've had the opportunity to apologize for griefing teammates but you refused to take it so you don't!  Unless you'd like to explain why he was stopping you from kicking someone, which you still havent?
Is this you fulfilling it first? hm.....I think your bias makes you so blind you have lost touch with reality. You should re-read that thread, because you sure as hell didnt approach it that way or I wouldn't of argued. Anyways this is my last post on the forums because of quality members and leadership.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 27, 2012, 09:38:29 pm
My complaint now is.. I ban too slowly!

Your complaint isin't about individual things. It's about the whole picture, your terrible as a whole, at being an admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2012, 09:56:09 pm
crazyi its because you are an awful poster who was still being trolled months later by badplayer saying 'not even sorry' after an accidental tk and what a surprise i was correct all along in that you instigated your ban incident TK with griefing, you are a dick and acted extremely hostile when i asked for clarification on your ban incident, i'm not a "biased" person i treat people like individuals, so i treat you like a mad nerd pubbie idiot because that's what you are, your post history is an embarrassment to yourself and i would never like to have coffee with you

sorry but you lose the right to being treated politely and with respect when you are a raging publord who goes off on a rant when i ask 'stop kicking who?" because you can't coherently string together a two sentence explanation because you knew honesty would not get your ban request anywhere

not really sure who this noodles guy is really or what his problem is either but if you're on crazyi's side, you are probably a blithering idiot too!

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on March 27, 2012, 10:05:51 pm
I like your use of commas and no periods. Well put sir, well put.

Oh and for the record I have no clue who he is. I also have no clue who the EU guy was that posted on the original thread about you being biased. All the people that are supporting you have been around for quite some time. Odd and goodbye, topdog.  :shock:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Gricks on March 28, 2012, 01:19:21 am
Wait... Smoothrich revenge tk'd someone Gricks?

Yeah, last night on siege. A guy named Illuminawti or something similar tked him. It was the 5th report so he got kicked, but right when he logged back in and spawned- Smoothrich tked him. Illuminawti was obviously twing on purpose so I suppose he did that instead of a ban.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 04:28:14 pm
Yeah, last night on siege. A guy named Illuminawti or something similar tked him. It was the 5th report so he got kicked, but right when he logged back in and spawned- Smoothrich tked him. Illuminawti was obviously twing on purpose so I suppose he did that instead of a ban.
Heh, wow... good adminship there. So what happens now? We need a third party admin in here to solve this? Do not quote me but I am pretty sure that results in a 24 hour ban.

Actually I believe that if an admin break the same rules as the community that populates the game, they are punished even greater due to the fact they are held to a higher standard, just like law enforcement.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 28, 2012, 04:35:59 pm
lol i didn't spawn tk anyone at spawn

people are allowed to accidentally tk and say sorry (which is what i did)

here's some character testimony

gricks:  chat troll and unrepentant racist defending spamming slurs in chat as not against the rules

Use of the N word in any context is not allowed around me.  I was feeling generous so I muted you instead of giving you a short vacation.

"How in the n***** did his stab go through my block?" Not insult nor racist, just a random curse word like when people say "How in the fuck" or "How in the shitballs." There is no way this violates the rules.

Seriously, just because Ganner (and seemingly the majority of people) are afraid of the word does not make the use of it racist. The admin should be taking the context and intentions into account. My intention was not to be racist nor insulting, and I wasn't. He had no right to mute me according to their server rules.

racist?  you bet.  inability to decide what is proper administration of the servers or not?  plainly!

emotion, biased against lljk?  lets see

Quote from: emotion link=topic,8628.msg127335.html#msg127335

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,8628.msg127335.html#msg127335

This is irrelevant i know, but I just had to comment.

LMFAO lady gaga u little whore you. Stop running your mouth u troll. you're annoying as shit. You came into ATS vent 6 days ago and tried recruiting ME, Noobie, and Damatacus. saying that if we joined it would only cost $10 paypal, and your name on a submission sheet, to get one months access. I've never seen a bigger troll in my life and that's why 3/4 of CRPG players cannot stand you. I don't care about this thread just wish you would disappear.

BTW, Ecko doesn't force us to do anything, we play where we want and what we want, in fact his main motto is, " once ATS, always ATS," stating that we can come and go as we please we never need to "re-join" unless we quit. And we do NOT have to donate unless we choose to.

Lady fuck face, it seems you're a little upset that ATS is better managed and well-ran, with better players, that trust our leader, and enjoy playing under ONE banner, while your cave troll so called "clan" seeks single opportunistic achievements that benefit solely the one individual that succeeds. Good luck in strategus you spear chucker.

BTW i laughed throughout typing this... at you.

Wow!  Somebody's mAd at videogames!

Okay let me get this straight, this is my first, ban, warning, yelled at, etc... I have ever received and I'm banned for 72 hours? (hmm) makes sense right? No. And Voester (nothing against you man) is banned for 24 when he is clearly visible in the screenies. (he's chaos initiate/member/recruit/what ever you want to call him, im ATS so i get 72 on first offense ever.) I never brought siege shields or anything, I never have bought those ever or even used them, I followed Jar around and proceeded to have fun. I was level 13 I believe if not lower, and I was 4-3. Now define delaying... well mainly, forcing the round to take longer than need be. I DID NOT do that. Anyways this shit happens all the time in game, I never heard of anyone ever getting a 72 hour ban for this, or even a ban at all.

Sincerely, A victim of abuse, Noodles.


Leeching and delaying on the server, and ones he's punished properly rages that it was admin abuse?  Looks like he does that too!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 04:55:31 pm
LMAO, was that like 8 months ago maybe longer, that was when I first joined ATS, you must have typed Noodles into the search bar lmao. Cute. Anyways, I didn't even know you were LLJK. I thought you were solo. Anyways it seems you have broke the rules in the game, and repricussions are on the way. (If what Gricks said is in fact true.) You are held to a higher standard, and if you broke the rules, i'm sure it will be serious.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 28, 2012, 04:59:05 pm
LMAO, was that like 8 months ago maybe longer, that was when I first joined ATS, you must have typed Noodles into the search bar lmao. Cute. Anyways, I didn't even know you were LLJK. I thought you were solo. Anyways it seems you have broke the rules in the game, and repricussions are on the way. (If what Gricks said is in fact true.) You are held to a higher standard, and if you broke the rules, i'm sure it will be serious.

Why don't you just quit?

Just, take a break buddy. You aren't fooling anyone. Arguing with him over this is a waste of time, mainly due to the fact that you've been proven wrong on every single occasion. I think I may dislike your posting style more then crazyi at this point.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 28, 2012, 05:35:53 pm
Yeah, last night on siege. A guy named Illuminawti or something similar tked him. It was the 5th report so he got kicked, but right when he logged back in and spawned- Smoothrich tked him. Illuminawti was obviously twing on purpose so I suppose he did that instead of a ban.

 00:52:14 - Illuminawti is kicked.
 00:52:27 - Illuminawti has joined the game with ID: 222073
 00:53:10 - Sippio <img=ico_swordone> Illuminawti
 00:53:58 - BIGPLAYcreator_Smoothrich_gg <img=ico_spear> Illuminawti
 00:54:02 - [BIGPLAYcreator_Smoothrich_gg] wOOps

So here's hard evidence that the guy's story was wrong too, as he rejoined, managed to get killed by an enemy (trying to actually play), then half a round later from him actually joining again I tkd him and said "woops" in an event I don't recall, but I can imagine was an accident trying to assault the walls or something.

After his 5/5 kick I don't see any more incidents of him being reported for team wounding, so maybe he was just playing recklessly until the 5/5 got him kicked?  Anyways, I shouldn't even waste my time defending myself to someone like you.  You honestly believe that you should be allowed to say n****r on the server and anyone who mutes you for casually saying stuff like that is an admin abuser:  if those are the types of people voting that I'm not doing my job on my poll, then I don't wanna do it right!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: dynamike on March 28, 2012, 05:49:45 pm
much like all of germany voting 1 for the holocaust, meaning it was the right thing to do.. right?

The FUCK smooth... that was low and wrong as well.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 28, 2012, 06:25:25 pm
The point is a poll passing doesn't mean it was right.  A majority holding an opinion doesn't make it ethical or true.  Just because Allers was poll banned it doesn't mean he needed to be poll banned and it does not make it a self-justified act.  I used the Holocaust to present, in the strongest language possible, my argument.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 06:33:44 pm
Sad.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 28, 2012, 06:52:32 pm
The point is a poll passing doesn't mean it was right.  A majority holding an opinion doesn't make it ethical or true.  Just because Allers was poll banned it doesn't mean he needed to be poll banned and it does not make it a self-justified act.  I used the Holocaust to present, in the strongest language possible, my argument.
Shoulda used 9/11
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 28, 2012, 06:54:43 pm
Sad.

Why are you still posting in this again? You're not even leaving feedback anymore.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 07:27:53 pm
Why are you still posting in this again? You're not even leaving feedback anymore.

Neither are you, clearly. So why are you here; forum police?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 28, 2012, 07:28:36 pm
Neither do you, clearly. So why are you here forum police?
Ban this emotional prick.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 07:31:31 pm
I'm emotional,(?) because Darkkarma comes in here to troll and only troll, and i'm the bad guy? Hop off his dick Kreczor.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 28, 2012, 07:32:38 pm
I'm emotional because Darkkarma comes in here to troll and only troll, and i'm the bad guy? Hop off his dick Kreczor.
It feels nice in my bum.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 28, 2012, 08:11:47 pm
I'm emotional,(?) because Darkkarma comes in here to troll and only troll, and i'm the bad guy? Hop off his dick Kreczor.

If I were forum police you would have been muted a while ago. You have done nothing but provide faulty evidence as to why you think smooth is a bad admin and then resort to tossing out add homonym attacks at any and everyone that refutes said claims. You're basically just shit posting now. Id tell you to go sit on your mother's lap and cool off, but im pretty sure that we are close to the same age, which is pitiful. That's not even trolling, I genuinely feel bad for you,bud .  :|
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 08:20:11 pm
 If i were forum police you would have been muted a while ago. You have done nothing but provide faulty evidence as to why you think smooth is a bad admin and then resort to tossing out add homonym attacks at any and everyone that refutes said claims. You're basically just shit posting now. Id tell you to go sit and your mother's lap and cool off, but im pretty sure that we are close to the same age, which is pitiful. That's not even trolling, I genuinely feel bad for you.  :?
[/quote]

So what is the difference between what I have posted and you have posted? I have agreed with, and you have disagreed. We both have our says and opinions, and just because I disagree you go off saying that I am not intellegently, to your standards explaining what is right or wrong in my eyes. The only thing you are doing now is trolling, and I am genuinely trying to figure this out, when you have nothing to do with this at all. You have contributed nothing but "reasons" to look down on me. This isn't about me. This is about Smoothrich, and it is being handled without you.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on March 28, 2012, 08:26:53 pm
You calling everyone an idiot and coming off as a condescending douchebag does not go hand in hand with disagreeing with someone. I never said you weren't intelligent, just childish for how rude you were being to everyone that didn't share your point of view.  And to say it has nothing to do with me is just silly. I'm just as much a member of this public forum as you are. You even said that you weren't affiliated with crayzi, so by your logic, it doesn't really involve you either. Your experiences with smooth as an admin make you a part of this discussion and so do mine. We just happen to disagree with one another. Furthermore, It's pretty much already been handled.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 08:33:12 pm
Actually it's not handled yet, but you would like to believe so. :D
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 28, 2012, 08:49:34 pm
Actually it's not handled yet, but you would like to believe so. :D

Why does this even concern you?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 09:09:21 pm
Why does this even concern you?

Why are you here again? I'm legitimately leaving admin feedback in the correct thread like I was advised to do, and by doing so some people spoke up, hence the reason why I am monitoring it. How about you?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on March 28, 2012, 09:47:32 pm
Why are you here again? I'm legitimately leaving admin feedback in the correct thread like I was advised to do, and by doing so some people spoke up, hence the reason why I am monitoring it. How about you?
Defending an admin's choice. From my perspective he did the right thing and so I will support my opinion of this hated admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rumblood on March 28, 2012, 09:53:50 pm
I have never had any discussion with smoothrich outside of the forums, hence never in-game.

Excessive trolling will lead to warnings.

Given that you've never had interaction with this Admin on the server, you are approaching this line. The one incident you are fishing over has nothing to do with you and I've not seen a complaint or ban request from the player(s) involved.
You've had plenty of space to make your opinion known on interactions that you were not involved with. Time for you to find another thread.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 09:55:18 pm
Defending an admin's choice. From my perspective he did the right thing and so I will support my opinion of this hated admin.

Then present your ideas/facts, don't talk down to me specifically. I have never done anything towards you personally and I don't think it is necessary to be honest.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: EyeBeat on March 28, 2012, 09:59:15 pm
Anyway you guys can get this Emotion guy to liven up my admin thread?  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 10:03:39 pm
Given that you've never had interaction with this Admin on the server, you are approaching this line. The one incident you are fishing over has nothing to do with you and I've not seen a complaint or ban request from the player(s) involved.
You've had plenty of space to make your opinion known on interactions that you were not involved with. Time for you to find another thread.

Actually this is the admin feedback thread and I am actually leaving honest feedback and then defending my opinions to other posters that seem to question my credibility. Is there an honest reason why you are now getting involved? Did I offend you or something? There is NO reason for you to come in here swinging your e-peen. I have done nothing wrong in this thread and I was advised by Kalam to take it to this particular thread. Then you go on saying you have not seen a complaint, tread back a bit and read previous pages before you decide to skip to the last page, post and complain. If anything you have nothing to do with this and you should not be in here posting your thoughts that are irrelevant.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 10:05:47 pm
Anyway you guys can get this Emotion guy to liven up my admin thread?  :mrgreen:

No, unfortunatly; because from my understanding you are doing your job fairly, I voted YES in your section.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 10:19:59 pm
Also, another reason why he is a terrible admin. According to Badplayer, he was INTENTIONALLY TK'd by Smoothrich.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28920.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28920.0.html)

What more do you guys need, honestly? This is the second report of an intentional tk in two days.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rumblood on March 28, 2012, 10:24:42 pm
Actually this is the admin feedback thread and I am actually leaving honest feedback and then defending my opinions to other posters that seem to question my credibility. Is there an honest reason why you are now getting involved? Did I offend you or something? There is NO reason for you to come in here swinging your e-peen. I have done nothing wrong in this thread and I was advised by Kalam to take it to this particular thread. Then you go on saying you have not seen a complaint, tread back a bit and read previous pages before you decide to skip to the last page, post and complain. If anything you have nothing to do with this and you should not be in here posting your thoughts that are irrelevant.

Why are you still posting in this again? You're not even leaving feedback anymore.
Neither are you, clearly. So why are you here; forum police?

You've had your opportunity to express your opinions. You are now trolling. This opinion has been expressed by more than one poster including other Admins. In addition, you are attempting to leave feedback on a situation in which you had no involvement. I've advised you of the forum rules.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 10:32:53 pm
I will continue to post here if I need to leave feedback or defend my position. You unfortunalty cannot tell me otherwise, I am not breaking any rules. I am doing what I was advised to do. All of my posts are Feedback related or situations where I have defended my reasoning of the previous.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BADPLAYERold on March 28, 2012, 10:34:51 pm
Also, another reason why he is a terrible admin. According to Badplayer, he was INTENTIONALLY TK'd by Smoothrich.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28920.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,28920.0.html)

What more do you guys need, honestly? This is the second report of an intentional tk in two days.

Smoothrich has proven he is an unbiased admin by banning himself for 24hours.

Even great men make mistakes, and it is the mark of a great man like Smoothrich to punish himself for those mistakes.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: dynamike on March 28, 2012, 10:46:38 pm
Wait, there is an edit button???

Triple posts should be bannable.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on March 28, 2012, 10:51:04 pm
Those three posts were legitimately seperated to answer or post about three seperate posts. Are you seriously coming here to troll me now? I have kept this civil the entire time.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: dynamike on March 28, 2012, 10:57:15 pm
Those three posts were legitimately seperated to answer or post about three seperate posts. Are you seriously coming here to troll me now. I have kept this civil the entire time.

Buddy, I am not trying to troll you, but you should just drop it. Nobody cares about the witch hunt you are on and honestly, you are getting carried away in my opinion.

And yes, separate answers and quotes can and should be addressed in the same reply post and sending me PM's about it won't change my opinion either.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 28, 2012, 11:36:57 pm
Triple posts should be bannable.

Technically, they are. Read the forum rules and rejoice.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Shadowren on March 28, 2012, 11:38:55 pm
Forum Rules http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,4112.0.html take a look   :o

Edit: I didn't know they existed in till Tears told me a long time ago  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Gricks on March 29, 2012, 12:31:21 am
Smoothrich what does any of that shit about me have to do with you purposely tking someone and failing to ban other tkers?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Earthdforce on March 29, 2012, 06:00:51 am
Smoothrich has proven he is an unbiased admin by banning himself for 24hours.

Even great men make mistakes, and it is the mark of a great man like Smoothrich to punish himself for those mistakes.

Proof he didn't actually ban himself...

http://steamcommunity.com/id/KaesoClarus/screenshot/558685307675396803?tab=public (check the timestamp)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on March 29, 2012, 06:22:51 am
that's community, not official

nice proof m8
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rhalzo on March 29, 2012, 07:47:09 am
Wait... I'm late to this party... why are we all pissed off?

Other than that question, Smoothrich seems to be a pretty good admin from my experiences.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Sarpton on March 29, 2012, 04:58:41 pm
In my experience Smooth has been a generally positive admin,  and as a player he's been really cool.  Does he get pissed off and make rash decisions?  Definitely,  but over all, I have had way more positive experiences with Smooth then negative.


**this sentence was stupid***
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Earthdforce on March 29, 2012, 10:15:19 pm
that's community, not official

nice proof m8
Derp, my bad xD. I forgot.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on April 10, 2012, 07:45:55 pm
"Bumping out of spawn is questionable but most of that looks intentional, and actual lancing at spawn (evident from the time stamps and damage inflicted) due to a M report grudge is pretty blatantly breaking the rules.

However I'm sure if I handle this ban request, I will get another 8 pages of shit posting in my admin feedback thread by this guy for abuse, who I've witnessed (and banned for) "revenge" teamkilling at spawn previously (a cav bumped him by accident during a fight so he killed him at spawn the next round out of spite in front of my eyes), and he obviously has rage issues.  I will let another admin handle it, because I don't think he will get the message about rules if I ban him, merely think he is being persecuted.  Just saying to the next admin, he is not a calm or respectful player in the least and doing this intentionally would fit his profile." - Smoothrich

So you would rather just troll the post? You resorted to name calling which is disrespectful. Even in this post you say I have rage issues. Troll more? I also TK'd badplayer at the END of a round, your eyes and memory sucks.

Fail admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on April 10, 2012, 10:25:43 pm
you are a liar, you tkd him at spawn, 4 people reported it in i chat and i saw it on the community server.  he tried to assist you the round before as you dueled me personally, he bumped you and i ended up killing you, so immediately next round you killed him at spawn and everyone on his team reported it. why would i lie about this.

go get kicked out of another clan tia

also i'm not "name calling" you i was letting any admin who decided to handle the request that you are a known griefer and team killer and you tend to rage in game and even moreso at the admins after you're banned

its sad you can't just apologize when you get banned or learn a lesson and instead just post essays criticising the admins as having some kind of grand conspiracy against you.  you have some sort of issues man
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on April 10, 2012, 11:40:43 pm
Shut the fuck up Crazyi, your ass has been team bumping me and twing me all the time on battle lately
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Crazyi on April 10, 2012, 11:48:25 pm
"he didn't TK me at spawn it was like 2 minutes into the round but w/e." - Badplayer
It was 5 players on our team, 15 on theirs. Yes, your memory SUCKS. The thread is still there you fucktard.

"shut up nerd" - Smoothrich
Not name calling here? Was this a polite gesture?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Ganner on April 10, 2012, 11:51:04 pm
Damnit smooth, stop stealing my badmin heat.  MY THREAD NEEDS MORE TRAFFIC DAMNIT.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rainbow on April 11, 2012, 03:23:19 am
I like smooth.  I have never had a problem with any admins.  Maybe I am doing something wrong?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on April 11, 2012, 03:33:57 am
I like smooth.  I have never had a problem with any admins.  Maybe I am doing something wrong?

Get banned and QQ and shitpost all over the admin's thread

then you got it
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Anwyl on April 11, 2012, 10:17:24 pm
Worst admin. How dare he ban people who break the rules.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Count_Curtis on April 30, 2012, 03:14:07 am
Shit admin. like the NA panos, apart from getting banned, he actually hands out the bans

-1. shit admin
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on April 30, 2012, 04:42:14 am
european:  -1
fallen member:  -100

so that leaves me at -1 and you at -101.. ur move mate
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Count_Curtis on April 30, 2012, 01:06:54 pm
lol at least fallen still exist
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on April 30, 2012, 03:11:29 pm
His clan still exists. 
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on April 30, 2012, 11:52:26 pm
PRO CLAN BEST NA CLAN
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rainbow on May 01, 2012, 12:43:58 am
PRO CLAN BEST NA CLAN

Your funny.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tanken on May 02, 2012, 08:56:57 pm
I am going to go ahead and bump Smooth's admin thread here, since I'm going through a bunch of admin's feedback threads.


Honestly, I think Smooth is one of maybe a handful of admins doing their job correctly. He's fair, unbiased, swift, and trustworthy. If you have an issue that you need an admin to handle, Smooth is one that you can quickly turn to via forums, steam, or often times in-game. He (most times) will stop what he is doing, whether it's another game or whatever, and log into the server, assess the situation, look at logs or screenshots, and then deliver his judgement.



Those whom have voted "No" on his feedback are either trolls or butt-hurts because Smooth delivered a ban on them, and he's one of few NA admins who will do this so of course he is going to receive the wrath of unhappy sperglords. That said, I believe Smooth, Ganner, Muki, and Karma (if Karma still has admin) are among the very few selective NA admins I've seen that do their job, and really work to better this community by being there for all players and serving the NA servers with a good brand of adminship.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Siberian_Wolf on May 10, 2012, 04:09:11 pm
He sucks.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rumblood on May 10, 2012, 11:58:10 pm
That said, I believe Smooth, Ganner, Muki, and Karma (if Karma still has admin) are among the very few selective NA admins I've seen that do their job, and really work to better this community by being there for all players and serving the NA servers with a good brand of adminship.

Screw you Tanken!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on May 11, 2012, 04:19:52 am
Screw you Tanken!

Ikr everyone always seems to forget you intill they get banned :)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on May 15, 2012, 09:56:32 am
Lazy admin who gives immature, half assed responses to ban topics, without reading through them, and is essentially 50/50 at this point on doing his job incorrectly/correctly despite having  clan behind him to pad those numbers in his favor.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Anwyl on May 15, 2012, 10:19:00 am
Lazy admin who gives immature, half assed responses to ban topics, without reading through them, and is essentially 50/50 at this point on doing his job incorrectly/correctly despite having  clan behind him to pad those numbers in his favor.

Sounds like you're mad PRO clan is making you look like a(the) scrub [that you are].
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on May 15, 2012, 10:50:19 am
Lazy admin who gives immature, half assed responses to ban topics, without reading through them, and is essentially 50/50 at this point on doing his job incorrectly/correctly despite having  clan behind him to pad those numbers in his favor.

I think you are a funny dude Spook but Rohypnol is pretty much griefed nonstop by poll spam or teamkilling whenever he tries to play just because he's a good horse archer.  Master of the Field was changed to always rise basically to specifically address Rohypnol haha, so if he's the last one standing the round is either guaranteed to end in about 30 seconds or he can try his best to kill everyone in that window and win, which he often does.

Polling the way you did is against the rules.  Several admins actually discussed this in our private forum, and we reached the consensus that behaviour like yours is wrong.  People shouldn't be punished for their playstyles.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TurmoilTom on May 15, 2012, 04:45:59 pm
Smooth is a badass and an awesome admin.

If I knew where he lived I would send him a 6-pack of beer.

( ^_^)o自自o(^_^ )
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rainbow on May 16, 2012, 01:01:42 am
Smooth is a badass and an awesome admin.

If I knew where he lived I would send him a 6-pack of beer.

( ^_^)o自自o(^_^ )
I will tell you where I live.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: BashirKhan on June 14, 2012, 09:46:53 am
Good admin overall, only reason his poll is so close is because he has a no holds barred stye of admining  :)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Voso on June 15, 2012, 02:15:09 am
The smoothest admin I've seen, and his jokes are rich.

+1
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: JasonPastman on July 10, 2012, 07:57:13 am
This is a terrible troll.  If you are going to grief an admin by accusing them of abuse and breaking rules, don't admit to calling someone a my old friend repeatedly while spamming polls against them, which is two rules broken at once.  Also, are you saying you tried to poll kick someone off the server because they were a cigarette?

If you had been paying attention, you would have actually read the thread which said that i was no directing those words at anyone (and if i was i proved they were not insulting). Furthermore, IT WAS NOT MY POLL.

GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.  furthermore, IM TAKING YOU OFF MY GOODMIN LIST AND PUTTING YOU ON MY BADMIN LIST!  I know how much this means to all you... and im sorry but it is what it is, and what it is is what it is!

just for the hell of it cuz me and muki are done flirting and apparently you wanna pick up where we left off, name the rule i broke and i will prove you wrong as i do not break the rules as I love this community and the ideals it represents more then anything (including booz, drugs, and women.  yah yah bring on the attacks but there's nothing like it -this community-).
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on July 10, 2012, 08:02:26 am
Before you continue trying to justify "my old friend" as not hurting anyone, I direct you to read this entire wikipedia page, and its related links.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_LGBT_people

Submitting polls without a good reason, especially multiple ones that aren't passing, is "poll abuse" which is explicitly against the rules. 

Using hate speech and other slurs is also against the rules.

So that's the two.  I don't mind you as a player and hardly see you griefing, but you shouldn't be shitting up admin threads for slap on wrist punishments when you clearly broke the rules.  Read the rules, man up and admit to and learn from your mistakes, and move on.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: JasonPastman on July 10, 2012, 08:05:45 am
IT WASN'T MY FING POLL

Wiki shit for sorces

as i said before in the muki thead

LOL...

First of the poll wasn't started by me.

Second off I said my old friend in chat twice (as the logs will confirm) and not directed towards anyone.  Furthermore let me define my old friend for you.

verb (used with object)
1.
to tire or weary by labor; exhaust (often followed by out ): The long climb my old friendged us out.
2.
British . to require (a younger public-school pupil) to do menial chores.
3.
Nautical . to fray or unlay the end of (a rope).

noun
6.
Slang . a cigarette.
7.
a my old friend end,  as of cloth.
8.
a rough or defective spot in a woven fabric; blemish; flaw.
9.
Chiefly British . drudgery; toil.
10.
British Informal . a younger pupil in a British public school required to perform certain menial tasks for, and submit to the hazing of, an older pupil.
(Source Dictionary.com)

So again what rule have I broken and where is my apology?

and again it was not directed at anyone.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on July 10, 2012, 08:16:46 am
It doesn't really matter who you directed it at.  Its a hate-filled word that is all too common place in gaming, don't be surprised when you are using it and causing some other kind of disruption, you get banned for it.

Actually, you were only muted.  Hardly an act of admin abuse worthy of spamming admin threads about.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: JasonPastman on July 10, 2012, 08:39:49 am
I  was hardly spamming, as typing something twice is not spamming, and again I wasn't directing it at anyone.  But nice save.  Honestly I hate giving you shit as your a good admin.  I wish you would pay me the same respect.  Furthermore, if admins actually cared about the use of this word there would be quite a bit more drama over it as it is commonly used by many others, over and over again. In addition there are constant other racist terms and references the are regularly used and ignored by admins.  If admins are actually serious about putting an end to this type of behavior they would not ignore it as they do. Good show.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rumblood on July 10, 2012, 06:06:22 pm
Half the population wants this to be strictly moderated, no non-nonsense, punish the evildoer's hard and often and shut down that hate speech!
Half wants this to be an anything goes Wild Wild West vigilante justice, foul talking, worse smelling, fend for yourself and woe for those who can't space.

We do our best to make both sides think we are with them.

 :P
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on July 12, 2012, 12:38:47 am
I feel Jason bitches at any admin that kicks/mutes/band him.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on July 12, 2012, 03:26:50 am
I feel Jason bitches at any admin that kicks/mutes/band him.

He a fan on my thread ;)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on July 12, 2012, 05:53:27 pm
I feel smoothrich should be removed as admin for several reasons.

I've said it before and i'll say it again.

*Leeching in A.I siege (mostly EU sieges, but going 2/5 after an entire match, only spouting shittalk shouldn't be ok. This is just one example  :rolleyes:)
*Biased decitions in pretty much all his admining.
*Involved in selling loompoints for money.
*Always shittalks on the forum, giving admins a bad reputation.
*Not doing his job as an admin.
*Not active anymore.
*Because meow said so in a thread aswell, and chairman meow is always right.  8-)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kreczor on July 12, 2012, 06:33:41 pm
I feel smoothrich should be removed as admin for several reasons.

I've said it before and i'll say it again.

*Leeching in A.I siege (mostly EU sieges, but going 2/5 after an entire match, only spouting shittalk shouldn't be ok. This is just one example  :rolleyes:)

-You've said this before with absolutely no poof behind it.

*Biased decitions in pretty much all his admining.

-Or maybe you're biased. Everyone has a point of view and because you don't agree with his decision, he's totally biased.

*Involved in selling loompoints for money.

-He had nothing to do with selling loompoints for money

*Always shittalks on the forum, giving admins a bad reputation.

-Admins are still players. You're asking him to change his personality because he has a certain title. He's an admin, but he's got his own flavor.

*Not doing his job as an admin.

-Evidence?

*Not active anymore.

-Maybe he's busy? I remember dexxtaa getting admin somewhere in the fall of last year and barely started playing till a couple months ago. He was at school yet kept his title so what's the issue here?

*Because meow said so in a thread aswell, and chairman meow is always right.  8-)

-Although true, meow is an eu admin and it's known that eu hates na and vice versa

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on July 12, 2012, 07:25:29 pm
I feel smoothrich should be removed as admin for several reasons.

I've said it before and i'll say it again.

*Leeching in A.I siege (mostly EU sieges, but going 2/5 after an entire match, only spouting shittalk shouldn't be ok. This is just one example  :rolleyes:)
*Biased decitions in pretty much all his admining.
*Involved in selling loompoints for money.
*Always shittalks on the forum, giving admins a bad reputation.
*Not doing his job as an admin.
*Not active anymore.
*Because meow said so in a thread aswell, and chairman meow is always right.  8-)

I average about 5 kills and maybe 6-10 deaths on EU siege, I am active the whole time, last siege i was in with smooth, we defended the secondary wall, which tactically, was better to defend.

One admin shit talking does not give all the other admins a bad rep.

He does his job because people bitch about him banning/kicking/muting them.

He obv is if he is in strat battles and shit talking people.

He is more active than meow is, and meow doesnt like LLJK, Shik is in charge of NA admins anyways.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on July 13, 2012, 11:23:56 am
To give context to the incident at hand provoking this feedback.

Aderyn posted a ban request thread because someone submitted a kick poll on him when he was last alive, when polls were specifically turned on by the admin present because of complaints about Aderyn running out of ammo and still kiting, and other shenanigans every round for several maps.

He submitted a ban request (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,35734.0.html), and the admin who saw these things started a thread in the admin forums.  We went over the rules, and cmp clarified that running out of ammo as an archer and running from combat to search for more arrows as last alive, is delaying.

The admin who saw most of this then closed Aderyn's ban request, giving the player who polled him a warning, but commenting on the disruption on the server Aderyn was causing.

Aderyn decided to post another ban request, feeling that the admin who had the most evidence and was playing at the time was being "biased."

That thread turned into shit posting from all parties involved, so I posted this, http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,35736.msg542572.html#msg542572 trying to clarify the discussion we had, the rules, what is delaying or not, acknowleding that polling for hating playstyle is wrong, but from what I understood Aderyn specifically ran out of ammo and continued to run, which is kick/poll worthy for delaying.

My attitude/posting is one thing (though it's certainly not against any rules to diss Hospitallers now and then, Aderyn), but honestly when it comes to decisions as admin on the forums, handling players personal/technical problems on Steam or IRC, understanding of rules, or how to manage a server/strat battle while I'm playing, I've never been anything but fair and reasonable, easily approachable and open, do my best to explain my reasoning, and defer to the head admins when something is questionable.

So go ahead and read my post trying to handle Aderyn's ban request, and tell me if that is either me being biased and abusive, or impartial, reasonable, and fair.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on July 13, 2012, 12:14:35 pm
the reason for the second post was that he did it again :/

And who said i had no arrows. I had arrows the entire time i was being chased and fired one every 5-10secs. I seriously fail to see the issue in that.

The reason i'm saying your biased is because you think i'm a kiting scum and wont ban aldo because your friends with him. That's the reason behind me calling you biased in this situation.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on July 13, 2012, 12:32:50 pm
I have never talked to Aldogalus before in my life, and I think you are a good player, and have even name dropped you in good player lists because when I am cav I consider you one of the top threats to me and my team.

Like or dislike, none of that influences any posts or decisions I make as an admin

The admin who was on during all of this said you ran from a 1 vs 6 for several minutes, scrounging for ammo, firing barely once a minute while running away picking up new arrows, and the entire server was complaining in "i" chat and dead chat for a stop to the delaying.  Thus we discussed if this is technically delaying or not on our admin board, and cmp eventually posted clarifying the rules, which I relayed to you and everyone involved before closing the thread with a warning and explanation.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Goretooth on July 13, 2012, 05:04:43 pm
I have never talked to Aldogalus before in my life, and I think you are a good player, and have even name dropped you in good player lists because when I am cav I consider you one of the top threats to me and my team.

Like or dislike, none of that influences any posts or decisions I make as an admin

The admin who was on during all of this said you ran from a 1 vs 6 for several minutes, scrounging for ammo, firing barely once a minute while running away picking up new arrows, and the entire server was complaining in "i" chat and dead chat for a stop to the delaying.  Thus we discussed if this is technically delaying or not on our admin board, and cmp eventually posted clarifying the rules, which I relayed to you and everyone involved before closing the thread with a warning and explanation.
Firing barely once a minute? lol stop making up stuff oh wait.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on July 13, 2012, 05:42:04 pm
I have never talked to Aldogalus before in my life, and I think you are a good player, and have even name dropped you in good player lists because when I am cav I consider you one of the top threats to me and my team.

Like or dislike, none of that influences any posts or decisions I make as an admin

The admin who was on during all of this said you ran from a 1 vs 6 for several minutes, scrounging for ammo, firing barely once a minute while running away picking up new arrows, and the entire server was complaining in "i" chat and dead chat for a stop to the delaying.  Thus we discussed if this is technically delaying or not on our admin board, and cmp eventually posted clarifying the rules, which I relayed to you and everyone involved before closing the thread with a warning and explanation.

Then putting on polls was nonsensical since dexxta only put them on since he was leaving (according to him, wich i assume is utter bullshit). If there where admins there that is. There where no admins there smooth. We both know it, so stop making shit up. It's kinda boring me how people tell me how many arrows i have.

Also... why put polls on if there are admins on when he specifically said he put it on because no admins was gonna be on?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on July 13, 2012, 06:03:03 pm
The admin on said one round you ran around with no arrows picking them up off the ground barely getting a chance to shoot and delaying vs multiple people for several minutes, and enabled polls after he was leaving in case you were griefing the server too bad with delaying or something like that, then started a thread in the admin forum to ask if running around last alive with no ammo is technically delaying or not.

So I'm not making things up, I'm just going by what the admin present said, and clarifying the rules for the future.  I don't see why you are even so worked up, its not like you got banned or in trouble, just your ban request turned into a warning for the player submitting polls because of your reported borderline delaying behaviour that game session.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: JasonPastman on July 13, 2012, 06:09:49 pm
JEEZ why are you guys arguing about a settled matter? When http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,20866.15.html is of far more serious concern!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on July 15, 2012, 01:39:24 pm
Nobody's as Smooth as Smoothrich.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mike_of_Kingswell on August 10, 2012, 02:52:10 am
This admin offered me to 'Suck his dick' today...not sure how to responde o this.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on August 10, 2012, 03:24:26 am
This admin offered me to 'Suck his dick' today...not sure how to responde o this.

Why didn't you take the offer from this badmin?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on August 10, 2012, 05:09:01 am
This admin offered me to 'Suck his dick' today...not sure how to responde o this.

You do neglect to mention you were harassing me in chat repeatedly for "leeching" in a strat battle while you were some dreadful score like 0-9 and i was 5-1 or so, actively playing and defending key objectives of the castle.  I was guarding the gatehouses of the outer then inner keep, killing anyone who entered before they could cause chaos.

Sorry if I don't appreciate being berated in all caps by someone recklessly feeding away tickets to the enemy team for an hour.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 02:01:24 am
http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-%28official%29/ban-snufalumy old friendus_astralis-and-viuxcrotter-for-poll-abusing/msg586477/#msg586477

Conducts himself like a child.

"spook you can't have it both ways, either you shit talk people in chat and act like a smug dick when you play and laugh off the constant teamwounds and poll kicks against you, or act like a meek casual gamer when you play and stop using chat entirely and then when anyone submits polls against you it will truly be unprovoked

instead if you rile up the servers to dislike you from nonstop "strutting your shit" and "stylin on kids" and then run to ban request forums/admins demanding bans when people are sick of you, you are a pussy no better then digglez or anders

shame on you"



Maybe it's my Master's Degree in Business Administration talking, but this is not how professionals act in any way, shape, or form.

Clearly there needs to be an age requirement on becoming an admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on August 21, 2012, 02:13:17 am
Don't talk shit to an entire server on a daily basis then run to admins (who you are very quick to insult as well) as soon as you get well deserved teamwounding and ban polls against you.  Its hypocritical and shows a lack of integrity in your pub superstar persona who should simply be above the petty trolls inflicted on you by the unwashed masses.

I don't care about talking shit in game while you own people really, but playing forum cop with ban requests over trivial things just makes you look like a baby, a shit tier member of the community like Anders and Digglez.

And who do you really see yourself as, Spook?  The well-educated, refined in skill, solo pub star who leads his team to multis on siege with funny and fast snaps back at people who try to insult ur achievements?  Or a crybaby who can deal out shit talk all day and when they give it back wants the admins he himself calls incompetent to win his battles for him.

Its up for you to decide.

Also don't you dare insult my professionalism in cRPG forum posting etiquette.  I know I staple my cRPG post history to my job resume for every application I hand in.  I haven't had any calls back but at least I've had plenty of time to pad my resume further with posts like this, so its all looking up.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Bobthehero on August 21, 2012, 02:15:26 am
Admins are supposed to be professionnals, like, having a formation and all?

From Wiki, take it like you want.

Quote
A professional is a person who is paid to undertake a specialized set of tasks and to complete them for a fee

Admins aren't supposed to be professionnal, until someone pays them.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 02:23:57 am
Admins are supposed to be professionnals, like, having a formation and all?

From Wiki, take it like you want.

Admins aren't supposed to be professionnal, until someone pays them.

They may not be getting paid, that but is no reason they shouldn't conduct themselves like a mature adult or in a professional manner. 
This isn't lord of the flies.  I'm not sure how everyone becomes admins.  Ive seen a few admit they were asked by other admins; which is a horrible system that leads to groupthink, corruption, and dirty politicking.

I'm sure if you had the choice Bob, you would prefer admins act like adults and not make excuses for them to behave immaturely just because they aren't getting paid for the job, for all intents and purposes, they volunteered for; even if asked by one of their admin buddies like I've seen admitted.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Bobthehero on August 21, 2012, 02:25:34 am
No actually, the more they fuck with you, the happier I am.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 02:35:53 am
Don't talk shit to an entire server on a daily basis then run to admins (who you are very quick to insult as well) as soon as you get well deserved teamwounding and ban polls against you.  Its hypocritical and shows a lack of integrity in your pub superstar persona who should simply be above the petty trolls inflicted on you by the unwashed masses.

I don't care about talking shit in game while you own people really, but playing forum cop with ban requests over trivial things just makes you look like a baby, a shit tier member of the community like Anders and Digglez.

And who do you really see yourself as, Spook?  The well-educated, refined in skill, solo pub star who leads his team to multis on siege with funny and fast snaps back at people who try to insult ur achievements?  Or a crybaby who can deal out shit talk all day and when they give it back wants the admins he himself calls incompetent to win his battles for him.

Its up for you to decide.

Also don't you dare insult my professionalism in cRPG forum posting etiquette.  I know I staple my cRPG post history to my job resume for every application I hand in.  I haven't had any calls back but at least I've had plenty of time to pad my resume further with posts like this, so its all looking up.

Teamwounding is against the rules.  Do I teamwound other people when I'm angry? No.  Do I try to poll kick other people when I'm angry? No.

You may try to desperately argue that "shit talking" is against the rules, too, to save some footing on your argument, but we both know you're guilty of doing the same thing.  I'm pretty sure you remember the other day when you tried to play that game with me (this is what hypocrisy would look like in case you weren't aware).

Maybe you just don't understand what the word hypocrisy means.  Either that or you're trying to stretch the meaning of the word for your own benefit solely.
I'm not reporting anyone for "talking shit" or throwing around insults.  If I was, that would be hypocrisy.  Do you understand the difference now?

Hypocrisy is doing one thing, and complaining when someone does it back to you or vice versa.  Not what you described.  I can go further into detail if you don't quite yet understand the concept.

All of your other points revolve around name calling and petty insults; which is more than people should expect from an admin in a position of authority and power; even if it is for a video game and the pinnacle of power inside your personal life.

I think I've more than made my point about how you are too immature for the job you are in the position of; judging by your own comments and replies.



Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Malaclypse on August 21, 2012, 02:37:00 am
Also don't you dare insult my professionalism in cRPG forum posting etiquette.  I know I staple my cRPG post history to my job resume for every application I hand in.  I haven't had any calls back but at least I've had plenty of time to pad my resume further with posts like this, so its all looking up.

Gold.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: dynamike on August 21, 2012, 03:27:02 am
gg Smoothfans
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: MrShine on August 21, 2012, 04:04:50 am
Maybe it's my Master's Degree in Business Administration talking, but this is not how professionals act in any way, shape, or form.

You are certainly a shining example of how to act professionally in cRPG.

like the time you applied to Chaos and immediately picked a fight with members..
er, I mean the time you pretended to be dead to get attention...shit
oh, how about the time you acted like your teams commander, barking orders and berating everyone like a mad child, every single round ever...ever...

god dammit

But you're right, how dare an unpaid admin be willing to dish it back out a little to someone who seems to treat everyone they play with like utter shit.  Maybe if they were educated like you they'd know how to treat people.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Havoco on August 21, 2012, 04:15:48 am
Smooth and spook should write a book together. Every chapter just arguing with the last one.

Last page, best shit I've read on these forums in awhile. Fuck diplomacy sub forum, if I want drama and other shit like that, I'm comin to smooths admin thread!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 07:42:17 am
You are certainly a shining example of how to act professionally in cRPG.

like the time you applied to Chaos and immediately picked a fight with members..
er, I mean the time you pretended to be dead to get attention...shit
oh, how about the time you acted like your teams commander, barking orders and berating everyone like a mad child, every single round ever...ever...

god dammit

But you're right, how dare an unpaid admin be willing to dish it back out a little to someone who seems to treat everyone they play with like utter shit.  Maybe if they were educated like you they'd know how to treat people.

Don't know who you are.  Doesn't matter.
Admins aren't there to "dish it back."  That's what somebody who has never been trained to handle real responsibility would do and think was a reasonable toward conducting themselves. 

If you're going to launch ignorant, petty personal attacks at me, save it for the game.

Also, don't go around carrying all that anger and cynicism inside.  It isn't healthy.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on August 21, 2012, 08:12:59 am
I find it mildly surprising that you don't know who MrShine is considering how often you play together and how long you both have been playing in general.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: SeQuel on August 21, 2012, 08:15:15 am
Don't know who you are.  Doesn't matter.
Admins aren't there to "dish it back."  That's what somebody who has never been trained to handle real responsibility would do and think was a reasonable toward conducting themselves. 

If you're going to launch ignorant, petty personal attacks at me, save it for the game.

Also, don't go around carrying all that anger and cynicism inside.  It isn't healthy.

You have to be hands down one of the biggest bundle of stickss to ever have joined cRPG. Everything you say, and do is as already stated utter shit. You go into servers with the intention to rile everyone up and start some kind of shit storm or debate because is the type of person you are, a piece of shit.

Stop being so fucking annoying and maybe someone will actually like you. Try it sometime, you might be surprised at the results.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 08:26:48 am
You have to be hands down one of the biggest bundle of stickss to ever have joined cRPG. Everything you say, and do is as already stated utter shit. You go into servers with the intention to rile everyone up and start some kind of shit storm or debate because is the type of person you are, a piece of shit.

Stop being so fucking annoying and maybe someone will actually like you. Try it sometime, you might be surprised at the results.

No idea who this person is either.  Frankly, life's too short to pay attention to every angry person who tries to tear you down to build their own self-esteem up for whatever personal reasons they may have.
That's probably a big reason I don't get bogged down by little things; especially the things complete strangers say over the internet.
No point paying attention to it or giving it any credence.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: SeQuel on August 21, 2012, 08:32:38 am
No idea who this person is either.  Frankly, life's too short to pay attention to every angry person who tries to tear you down to build their own self-esteem up for whatever personal reasons they may have.
That's probably a big reason I don't get bogged down by little things; especially the things complete strangers say over the internet.
No point paying attention to it or giving it any credence.

You gave me attention by responding to me, so I'm not quite sure where you're going with that.

I mean, you can sit here and act like you don't act like a giant bundle of sticks in game, that's fine with me but I'm going to tell you up front whether you want to take it as a troll or not. Now my concern it if you ACTUALLY think you don't do anything wrong which would give me the assumption you're a troll or mentally ill.

I hope you don't get bogged down by what I say because that wasn't my goal. I'm trying to tell you if you didn't act like such a douche in game you might make some friends and enjoy yourself. Every time you're in the server you try to cause shit. Do you actually play the game or do you just play it to troll people? I don't really understand maybe you can help me out and care to explain.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 08:44:49 am
You gave me attention by responding to me, so I'm not quite sure where you're going with that.

I mean, you can sit here and act like you don't act like a giant bundle of sticks in game, that's fine with me but I'm going to tell you up front whether you want to take it as a troll or not. Now my concern it if you ACTUALLY think you don't do anything wrong which would give me the assumption you're a troll or mentally ill.

I hope you don't get bogged down by what I say because that wasn't my goal. I'm trying to tell you if you didn't act like such a douche in game you might make some friends and enjoy yourself. Every time you're in the server you try to cause shit. Do you actually play the game or do you just play it to troll people? I don't really understand maybe you can help me out and care to explain.

To be frank, I just don't respect your opinion enough to warrant the effort to attempt to reason with you.  You've already clearly demonstrated to me that you'd prefer to throw out insults instead of conversing like an adult.  I've played that game before with people such as yourself and know how pointless it is.  People like that can't be reasoned with (especially over the internet).  Whether due to a lack of emotional maturity, de-sensitivity from reality, or just inner turmoil.

Pointing out the fact that I don't pay attention to people like you and what's his face is just the truth.  I can acknowledge it in the moment right now, because in a few minutes I'll have completely forgotten.  While even in the static moment, it still won't matter.  If you took my approach, you'd feel the same way and wouldn't be holding on to any grudges to strangers who don't know who you are.  It's just a rational decision that fosters a healthy attitude and state of wellbeing not to pay attention to people who live to tear you down.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Malaclypse on August 21, 2012, 08:46:40 am
That's probably a big reason I don't get bogged down by little things; especially the things complete strangers say over the internet.
No point paying attention to it or giving it any credence.

Quite a Catch-22 you have there; it's good advice, given by a stranger over the internet. If there is value in heeding it, then I by doing so will be violating its tenets.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Spook Island on August 21, 2012, 08:59:34 am
Quite a Catch-22 you have there; it's good advice, given by a stranger over the internet. If there is value in heeding it, then I by doing so will be violating its tenets.

I'm still a little baffled people think they are somehow doing themselves a favor by holding little balls of negativity and hate inside themselves for strangers; especially strangers who have no genuine idea of who they are or that they exist.  Trust me, you'll do yourself a bigger favor by letting go of that negativity and hate. 
You aren't hurting me.  You're hurting yourself. 

I think that's what a lot of people fail to realize.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on August 21, 2012, 09:01:21 am
Quite a Catch-22 you have there; it's good advice, given by a stranger over the internet. If there is value in heeding it, then I by doing so will be violating its tenets.
I'm still a little baffled people think they are somehow doing themselves a favor by holding little balls of negativity and hate inside themselves for strangers; especially strangers who have no genuine idea of who they are or that they exist.  Trust me, you'll do yourself a bigger favor by letting go of that negativity and hate. 
You aren't hurting me.  You're hurting yourself. 

I think that's what a lot of people fail to realize.

It was a neutral assessment made likely out of quiet amusement from the logic fallacy, hardly negative nor hateful. From a third-party perspective it seems as if you have adopted a combative stance and are starting to make negative assumptions about others which is influencing your judgement and ability to assess arguments and conversations.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Vibe on August 21, 2012, 10:47:19 am
what I got from the last two pages is that spook is full of dicks in his mouth
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: dynamike on August 21, 2012, 12:49:33 pm
Don't let them bring you down, Spook! You go, girl!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: MrShine on August 21, 2012, 02:34:56 pm
At this point Spook's just trolling, not even Spook could be idiotic enough to believe the things he typed. 


Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Meow on August 21, 2012, 05:40:10 pm
I'm still a little baffled people think they are somehow doing themselves a favor by holding little balls of negativity and hate inside themselves for strangers; especially strangers who have no genuine idea of who they are or that they exist.  Trust me, you'll do yourself a bigger favor by letting go of that negativity and hate. 
You aren't hurting me.  You're hurting yourself. 

I think that's what a lot of people fail to realize.

Ain't you the dead guy?
Account sharing?
Ban time.
Title: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: TugBoat on August 28, 2012, 10:24:40 am
If you want to read the full discussion you can check it on the NA Allstars thread pages 82 and 83. I proposed a fun north vs. south battle now that the votes were over and proposed that California could be on the side of the south to help balance things out since both New York and California had strong players. This sparks a very brief historical debate, where I agree that the leadership of California and the leadership of the south were at odds but what the average citizen wanted back then was the same and had nothing to do with slavery.

Smooth then goes off on a tirade where he personally insults me and drops racial slurs while at the same time calling me a racist.

Quote
No, it wasn't.  You are a traitor revisionist and sympathizer, and thus a disgusting human being with no moral or ethic compass, a failed education, and are probably a racist. 

Let us quote the famous "Cornerstone Speech" of the Vice-President of the traitor States of America, Alexander Stephens, laying out the true meaning of the Confederacy, a few weeks after the first states seceded.

"Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the black in spanish is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition."

And the brave traitor patriots who fought to preserve their freedom?

"The Twenty-Slave Law, passed by the traitor Congress on October 11, 1862, during the American Civil War (1861–1865), created an exemption to military conscription for the owners of twenty or more slaves. The law was controversial in much of the South, where it served to exacerbate certain social rifts and led to claims by drafted soldiers that they were fighting a "rich man's war.""

Also, the articles of the confederation outlawed any traitor states from ever seceding themselves.  Because Big Government is only ruining liberty and freedom when its stopping you from whipping friends to death in your cotton fields as you get rich off generations of despair, in an entrenched aristocracy that would make even Russian or Chinese serfs of the era shake their heads at the backwards Americans.

More freedom for the traitors?  How about the traitor Home Guard, the literal Gestapo of the south?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/traitor_Home_Guard  They went around dragging off Real Americans who possibly didn't want to be sent to the front lines for suicidal human wave charges by brave General Lee after living an already impoverished life in order to maintain the status quo of an absurd inequality in wealth and power.

Do you know how West Virgina was formed?  A region of poor, slaveless mountain farmers, part of the wealthiest, most slave owning state of the confederacy, realized that "Hey, we don't hate friends enough/get enough money from friends to be willing to be sent to die in human wave attacks for the next 5 years.  Fuck you Confederacy, we are making our own state and joining the Union"  Bless them.

I could go on, but you probably already have it ingrained in your mind, from your family, your uprbringing, your culture, your friends, and your seething hatred of the inferior black in spanish race, that the Confederacy was a popular movement founded in principles of freedom and liberty, unlatching themselves from an oppressive, overbearing federal government.

Well Tugboat.  You're wrong.

Why is a troll who everyone pretty much unanimously agrees does a terrible job allowed to stay as an admin? He doesn't enforce rules and he posts racist shit and personal attacks on forums? What's the deal?


Edit:   More racism and trolling from smooth in other forum

Quote
Haha, like when you called Huey a 16 year old retard who doesn't realize that the GLORY of the south would or should empower California citizens to go lynch black in spanishs back in the 1860s?  Don't worry, I'm sure whatever state you're from kept that tradition alive long into the 20th century!
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Christo on August 28, 2012, 10:26:20 am
(click to show/hide)
:lol:

Just had to do it again, sorry for repeating myself.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Oberyn on August 28, 2012, 10:26:44 am
I pretty much agree with him, the whole "it wasn't about slavery, it was about states rights" meme is pure historical revisionism. I wouldn't call people who suscribe to it racist necessarily. Just misinformed. Not really too unusual to salvage some type of honorable reason for a war that many people's ancestors died in.
Then again, I also agree with you that he shouldn't be an admin.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: TugBoat on August 28, 2012, 10:29:22 am
I pretty much agree with him, the whole "it wasn't about slavery, it was about states rights" meme is pure historical revisionism.
Then again, I also agree with you that he shouldn't be an admin.

I'm not saying it wasn't about slavery. He makes it seem like that in his post. The rich ran things, and the politicians. They cared about slavery. The average person wasn't rich enough to run a plantation themselves. The kids who were off dying in this war didn't. I was talking about the every day person in California and the South probably agreed on most fundamental things. I know the people running shit made it about racism, but the citizenry who supported the South didn't want Uncle Sam meddling in their business.

Anyways that's not the point. The point is he is okay with trolling and using racial slurs on the official CRPG forums. That's not okay. When you are a moderator you should conduct yourself in a professional civil manner and not act that way.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Oberyn on August 28, 2012, 10:33:11 am
Of course, he's a fucking goon before anything else, i.e the bottom of the barrel of the internet, along with 4chan and other likeminded trolls. His statements on literaly anything can't be taken seriously, because he is an antagonistic contrarian cunt who will say anything to piss off other people then pretend it makes him morally superior.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on August 28, 2012, 10:46:51 am
inb4 hurr i troled u, u mad, y no taek joke
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: TugBoat on August 28, 2012, 10:53:43 am
inb4 hurr i troled u, u mad, y no taek joke

Nah it'll be a long winded passive aggressive comment mixed in with unfounded allegations about me being a traitor revisionist, subtle racism, and typed with just enough pretentious language and sarcasm to get some people to pretend to agree with him out of amusement.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Arathian on August 28, 2012, 11:04:37 am
Hey man, racism is what makes smoothrich special and cuddly!
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Kuujis on August 28, 2012, 11:05:34 am
THis is good drama material, somewhere near "communism-fascism comparison" in the ladder.  Need to get pop-corns 8-)
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Elmokki on August 28, 2012, 11:23:42 am
Oh the silly NA drama!

Smoothrich is a great admin. We need more Smoothriches. This topic is a superb example of why! Drama entertains me more than cRPG!
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Smoothrich on August 28, 2012, 11:24:34 am
I only gave it to you with such ferocity because you called Huey an uneducated, ignorant child because even though he is a minority living in California, he shouldn't DARE speak out against the glory of the CSA as seen in California's eyes.  You said he didn't know enough about history to hold his arguments, so I went ahead and used cited, primary sources of the era to paint an example of the regional divides in Californian sentiment towards teh confederacy (they thought it was shit unless they owned slaves already) and just how generally bad the CSA was, because I agreed with Huey.

You went ahead and said "..it really wasn't about slavery.. it was states rights..".  You deserve everything you get once you say that, for the sake of the 800,000 dead americans in the civil war, and the untold millions of blacks who have had their lives ruined for hundreds, hundreds of years because of the institution of slavery.

If being AGAINST SLAVERY is reasons for me to be deadminned, then deadmin me.  Everything I do, I do for my country and my people.

No masters, no regrets.  Freedom of speech, of expression, and since the Union won the civil war, freedom of you know.. actually existing.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Taser on August 28, 2012, 11:36:34 am
Maybe not now but back in the day they were a frontier state who didn't want big government meddling in their business. If they had had a proper army and war infrastructure they might have.

If you look at history, democrats were actually the opposition party at the time. The republican party back then was the more progressive party.

You have to look at historic and cultural context.

I'm sorry but aren't you like 16 years old Huey? I'm not hating.. I'm just not sure you're the type of person with the insight or historical knowledge to be able to say whether or not California during the time of the civil war could have been swayed to be on the side of the South. It's a very complex issue, and I'm pretty sure no one here really knows all the ins and outs of it.

I merely said that California should be on the South side since New York is so stacked. California is also stacked, and a lot of the southern states are hurting for good dudes. California also has a lot of players so I think it'd be balanced.

Don't see where he's calling him a retard or even mentions huey being a minority.

He does call him out on his age but.. very mildly.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: TugBoat on August 28, 2012, 11:39:58 am
I only gave it to you with such ferocity because you called Huey an uneducated, ignorant child because even though he is a minority living in California, he shouldn't DARE speak out against the glory of the CSA as seen in California's eyes.  You said he didn't know enough about history to hold his arguments, so I went ahead and used cited, primary sources of the era to paint an example of the regional divides in Californian sentiment towards teh confederacy (they thought it was shit unless they owned slaves already) and just how generally bad the CSA was, because I agreed with Huey.

You went ahead and said "..it really wasn't about slavery.. it was states rights..".  You deserve everything you get once you say that, for the sake of the 800,000 dead americans in the civil war, and the untold millions of blacks who have had their lives ruined for hundreds, hundreds of years because of the institution of slavery.

If being AGAINST SLAVERY is reasons for me to be deadminned, then deadmin me.  Everything I do, I do for my country and my people.

No masters, no regrets.  Freedom of speech, of expression, and since the Union won the civil war, freedom of you know.. actually existing.

Have you not heard of context, Smooth? I was talking about what the average citizen cared about, not about what the politicians or people running the states wanted. I even said this explicitly when I began to the discussion with Huey, and I only mentioned Huey's age because HOW THE FUCK CAN A 17 YEAR OLD KID SPEAK FOR A BUNCH OF POOR PROSPECTORS AND FARMERS AND MERCHANTS FROM THE 1800S WHEN HE ISNT EVEN TWO DECADES OLD.

You need to have your admin powers revoked. You are a hapless troll and clearly have emotional problems of some fashion

Modify: and what the fuck does my point have to do with playing down those who lost their lives in the war? You are a fool and don't have the maturity, wisdom, or intelligence to be a mod that actually has to make mature informed decisions about things.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: HardRice on August 28, 2012, 11:40:47 am
He is #1 admin.

So smooth.

Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Ganner on August 28, 2012, 11:49:50 am
And why is this not in the feedback forum?

And why is this relevant to his IG performance as an admin?

And why is this relevant to him moderating ONLY the NA BAN section of this forum purely to lock threads that have been delt with?

Drama thread is... Dramatic!
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Paul on August 28, 2012, 11:51:06 am
He is the kind of admin NA deserves to have.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Jacko on August 28, 2012, 11:51:28 am
He is the kind of admin NA deserves to have.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Ganner on August 28, 2012, 11:52:20 am
He is the kind of admin NA deserves to have.

Blanket ban all NA only solution.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: HardRice on August 28, 2012, 11:52:39 am
He is the kind of admin NA deserves to have.

I love you, Paul.

Now... Blanket ban NA!
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Razzer on August 28, 2012, 11:56:19 am
New dramathread for this week?
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Smoothrich on August 28, 2012, 12:00:25 pm
What average americans in the 19th century were thinking

if white and poor:  please don't send me to die for rich and white
if black:  this is literally the worst state of existence
if rich and white (in south):  please send poor white people to die so i can stay rich based on the worst state of existence for others
north: abolitionism is natural law (basic enlightenment principles), i'm off to work at the factory
south: welp i have no money, job, literacy, or voting rights because i live in an aristocracy, and probably starving to death because of no economy, what's the fastest way north?

Tugboat, you were a jerk to Huey so I was a jerk to you, and I felt you were fundamentally misrepresenting the attitudes of 1860s america.  It had nothing to do with small government and states rights, southern fatcats were just sending people to die to keep slaves.  This was good if you were wealthy, a death sentence if you were poor.  Trying to spin this any other way is revisionist, which is toxic for our national identity.  I don't even care THAT much, but calling someone a dumb teenager with no place to speak because he's ignorant is just being a dick, and you obviously crumble when someone gives it back.

Ultimately, this is all irrelevant to adminning cRPG servers, because god knows when I go on siege which I do often now, there are no admins and people griefing, teamkilling, spamming chat, etc, all of which I handle without a second thought. 

Understandably people will cringe at someone with NA Admin under their username shit posting, trolling, being racist, or posting porn or something, but all I did was call you out for sounding like a traitor sympathizer, and these forums tend to be a breeding ground for hate mongering, enough that I have considered reporting threads to the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the American Civil Liberties Union on multiple occassions.  I let Europeans wallow in their neo-YMCA until radical right wing parties inevitably sweep over the continent once the EU collapses.

edit:  in case you don't get it, saying common people supported the CSA, aka that it was a populist movement, and Huey is wrong for saying his state would never support CSA, is historical revisionism.  That's my point.  It wasn't popular.  All it meant for the regular person was suffering and war for rich people's benefit.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Oberyn on August 28, 2012, 12:15:25 pm
these forums tend to be a breeding ground for hate mongering, enough that I have considered reporting threads to the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the American Civil Liberties Union on multiple occassions.  I let Europeans wallow in their neo-YMCA until radical right wing parties inevitably sweep over the continent once the EU collapses.

Hahaha what a complete retard. I wonder what the SPLC would say if they had access to your chat logs.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Vibe on August 28, 2012, 12:16:07 pm
lol as if anyone takes this guy seriously
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: POOPHAMMER on August 28, 2012, 12:28:00 pm
If you want to read the full discussion you can check it on the NA Allstars thread pages 82 and 83. I proposed a fun north vs. south battle now that the votes were over and proposed that California could be on the side of the south to help balance things out since both New York and California had strong players. This sparks a very brief historical debate, where I agree that the leadership of California and the leadership of the south were at odds but what the average citizen wanted back then was the same and had nothing to do with slavery.

Smooth then goes off on a tirade where he personally insults me and drops racial slurs while at the same time calling me a racist.

Why is a troll who everyone pretty much unanimously agrees does a terrible job allowed to stay as an admin? He doesn't enforce rules and he posts racist shit and personal attacks on forums? What's the deal?


Edit:   More racism and trolling from smooth in other forum

Do the world a favor and go skinny dipping in a volcano
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: dynamike on August 28, 2012, 02:21:47 pm
He is the kind of admin NA deserves to have.

This explains why Shik is the kind of developer NA deserves to have.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oprah_winfrey on August 28, 2012, 02:55:46 pm
I agree with all of the above, reinstate poophammer as an admin.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: Swaggart on August 28, 2012, 04:00:33 pm
...and I only mentioned Huey's age because HOW THE FUCK CAN A 17 YEAR OLD KID SPEAK FOR A BUNCH OF POOR PROSPECTORS AND FARMERS AND MERCHANTS FROM THE 1800S WHEN HE ISNT EVEN TWO DECADES OLD.

To be perfectly fair, you are in no position to speak for those "prospectors and farmers from the 1800s" even if you are 40 years old as anything you will say is opinion.

(Before you start telling me you studied history, history is an opinion about past events.)

Quote
You need to have your admin powers revoked. You are a hapless troll and clearly have emotional problems of some fashion

He should lose admin because he aggressively disagreed with you over the Civil War? Sure, he may have insulted you but I see admins doing that pretty frequently.

You're just butthurt.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Cyclopsided on August 28, 2012, 05:26:55 pm
I had no idea this would spiral out of control in such a way.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Dexxtaa on August 28, 2012, 06:20:54 pm
Cam here to see Swag's quote for signature.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TugBoat on August 28, 2012, 06:56:51 pm
Smooth, I wasn't misrepresenting shit, and I wasn't being a jerk to Huey. Stop putting words in my mouth.

Me calling out Huey's age doesn't make me more qualified to speak on behalf of those people. I wasn't attempting to speak on behalf of those people. You guys clearly don't pay attention to a little thing called CONTEXT. He said "CALIFORNIA WOULDN'T DO THAT". He WAS speaking on behalf of the entire state. I merely pointed out that a teenager isn't qualified to do that. I wasn't speaking on behalf of anyone. I merely pointed out that it was possible that while the average person in leadership of the states perhaps fundamentally disagreed, but the citizenry of the two states probably had a lot more in common than they realized.

This then sparked Smooth to not "aggressively correct me" or whatever the fuck he's claiming to do. He accused me of being a racist, traitor revisionist, implying that I had these racist values ingrained into my inbred brain by racist hate mongering parents.

Smooth's trolling and racial slurs have everything to do with him being an admin. Being an admin is a responsibility where it is important to be level headed and first and foremost follow the rules of the community. Racial slurs and such personal attacks against me clearly were done in a fit of nerd rage, and someone with an attitude like that doesn't need to have admin powers. Even if he is only delegated to locking ban threads, why should he be given that responsibility at all? He has the lowest approval rating of any admin I see, he's a 24/7 troll who personally attacks members of this community unprovoked and uses racial slurs. if he were just a normal average member I wouldn't post about it, but as an admin he should hold himself to a higher standard of personal conduct and not act like a child.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: dynamike on August 28, 2012, 07:12:26 pm
Being an admin is a responsibility where it is important to be level headed and first and foremost follow the rules of the community.

I found something I actually agree with in here.
Title: Re: Why is Smoothrich still an admin?
Post by: DaveUKR on August 28, 2012, 07:56:42 pm
He is the kind of admin NA deserves to have.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on August 29, 2012, 02:13:01 am
ok dude sorry for being mean i was just a dick cuz you acted like one to huey and only said racist terms to establish the character of the CSA (it was bad)

All I did was post my opinions and laid down historical fact and evidence about the CSA, and tried to clear up your misconception that there was popular appeal in the CSA for states rights and limited government.  That idea you have was literally dreamt up in the early 20th century by southern apologists to try to change the historical narrative.  It's a lie!  I don't hate you or the south, but I hate a system that can distort the past and have it believed as fact by everyone generations to come.

And don't try to tell someone they aren't old or educated enough to talk to you on a subject when you disagree.  You are just begging to get owned by somebody for sounding like an arrogant dick, doubly so when you are wrong in the first place.

Lastly, most of us here are Americans, and we should believe in 1 thing above all others.  The Freedom of Speech.  So what if we disagreed?  THIS IS AMERICA.  You are supposed to defend, with passion, with oratory, with facts, with the truth, to defend and persuade and sway public opinion, to make the country, or even just these forums, a better place.  Its the principles our nation's democracy were founded on.

Ultimately my goal was simply to make some laugh, to make some cry, to make some feel good, to mourn those who died, to get tempers flared, to show why I care, and at the end of the day people can look back and say HEY MAYBE I LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY and wow that dude's right the CSA was not fucking okay!

I apologize to all who have been offended for my choice in words, and to Tugboat for insinuating he was a racist repeatedly.  I just find it had to seperate the CSA with racism, much like chocolate chip cookie Germany and anti semitism (and everything elseism). 

Thank you for the negative feedback votes in my thread, as always they are to me displays of affection.  Take care.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TugBoat on August 29, 2012, 02:58:57 am
ok dude sorry for being mean i was just a dick cuz you acted like one to huey and only said racist terms to establish the character of the CSA (it was bad)

All I did was post my opinions and laid down historical fact and evidence about the CSA, and tried to clear up your misconception that there was popular appeal in the CSA for states rights and limited government.  That idea you have was literally dreamt up in the early 20th century by southern apologists to try to change the historical narrative.  It's a lie!  I don't hate you or the south, but I hate a system that can distort the past and have it believed as fact by everyone generations to come.

And don't try to tell someone they aren't old or educated enough to talk to you on a subject when you disagree.  You are just begging to get owned by somebody for sounding like an arrogant dick, doubly so when you are wrong in the first place.

Lastly, most of us here are Americans, and we should believe in 1 thing above all others.  The Freedom of Speech.  So what if we disagreed?  THIS IS AMERICA.  You are supposed to defend, with passion, with oratory, with facts, with the truth, to defend and persuade and sway public opinion, to make the country, or even just these forums, a better place.  Its the principles our nation's democracy were founded on.

Ultimately my goal was simply to make some laugh, to make some cry, to make some feel good, to mourn those who died, to get tempers flared, to show why I care, and at the end of the day people can look back and say HEY MAYBE I LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY and wow that dude's right the CSA was not fucking okay!

I apologize to all who have been offended for my choice in words, and to Tugboat for insinuating he was a racist repeatedly.  I just find it had to seperate the CSA with racism, much like chocolate chip cookie Germany and anti semitism (and everything elseism). 

Thank you for the negative feedback votes in my thread, as always they are to me displays of affection.  Take care.

You completely dodged the meaning behind my words and pushed your own agenda onto me and used that as an excuse to insult me and my family in an abusive manner.

I was talking about the average citizen, not your typical politician/landowner/aristocrat who made the decisions. I never said Huey was uneducated, and the meaning behind my comment towards him was that he wasn't old enough, and neither am I, or you, or anyone else in the CRPG community to make generalizations about how people felt about something. You can quote Wikipedia until you're blue in the face, but it's pretty clear to everyone that you are an immature, emotionally unstable troll who lacks the tact and demeanor necessary to be an effective leader of this community, which is what your title as admin makes you. What's sad to me is that none of the devs care enough about your trolling ways to do anything about it, but that's okay. I don't care either really, I just hope that you learn to not jump to drastic conclusions and make ridiculous claims and put words in people's mouths.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on August 29, 2012, 03:08:30 am
I see you have refused to accept my apology with the honor and grace befitting of a southern gentlemen.  I am left without a choice.  I challenge you.. to a duel.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TugBoat on August 29, 2012, 03:18:36 am
I see you have refused to accept my apology with the honor and grace befitting of a southern gentlemen.  I am left without a choice.  I challenge you.. to a duel.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Accepted but only if we can have a musket duel in Napoleonic wars where we start back to back, someone tells us to start walking, and then when to fire. We turn around an fire a shot. if neither of us is dead we fix bayonets and fight.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on August 29, 2012, 03:25:39 am
Alright in all honesty, Smoothrich says some pretty hilarious but hurtful things at times. Even then, the most damning things ive seen him say are what was in that TS chat. Im not even going to fault him for that since as a former admin seeing and talking with many other admins in the past, I know much worse things have been said when speaking candidly or freely outside of these forums. He's highly opinionated and people's opinions can really suck at times, but hey, we are all entitled to them right? And I know people want to bring in that whole "Oh hes an admin and hes expected to adhere to a higher standard of conduct while setting a good example for everyone on these forums." I say bullshit to that. This isn't the blizzard administrative staff we are talking about here. This isn't even a paying job. Whats more, the admin position as a  whole is already plagued with inactivity and indecisiveness and in some cases blatant favoritism.  On top of that, while ive met plenty of cool people, this is still one of the shittiest communities ive been a part of in a long time. I dont think the turkish trolls are going to be any less unbearable if they have the shining beacon of immaculate admin conduct constantly showering down upon them. I don't think other shit posters are going to stop from posting gems like "shitty NA's being shitty, get owned, amerifats" or "heh daily NA drama thread  :lol:" just because the in game moderators are always minding their P's and Q's. Maybe an admin's cool-headed response to the daily flood of idiotic complaints and tantrums from the average crpg player will cause said player to reflect upon their actions and straighten up and fly right? Maybe people on NA will stop saying shik is the reason for inconvenient server crashes during strat battles, thus making him the worst dev on the mod while shouting out "RETARD, THE SERVER" in IRC multiple times if he simply explains to them enough that it had nothing to do with him? Now, has smoothrich made some bad calls before? He certainly has, but I wouldn't say hes been any worse than some other, "good" admins. Just the other day Spookisland, a pretty infamous player was poll abused constantly in siege simply for being annoying in chat only to have an admin say "eh, if enough of the community agrees on it then it must be a valid reason for you to deserve it." This discussion went on in threads only to have the majority of the community telling spook to fuck off while supporting the admin.  Meanwhile, a guy had has admin removed before he even knew what was happening simply because he capitalized on a noob's mistake in the marketplace, despite him actually being a pretty vigilant admin all because one guy who happened to be a clan mate of the victim bitched and moaned enough to cause the devs to agree to remove this players admin. The inconsistency on this forum is pretty disgusting. I know I certainly wouldn't ever list the crpg dev team as a reference if I ever wanted to apply as administrative staff in any other online game/community. Im not even trying to defend Smoothrich here, but come on; at least give valid reasons pertaining to in game/actual administrative conduct to back your campaign for trying to deadmin someone(trust me, they are out there.) Don't do it simply because they said something that hurt your feelings in a sub forum that has nothing to with being an admin what so ever. That's incredibly thin-skinned and part of the problem with this community. This is all opinion ofcourse!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on August 29, 2012, 03:29:23 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


(click to show/hide)

ENTER KEY MOTHERFUCKER, CAN YOU USE IT?!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on August 29, 2012, 03:31:44 am
THE ENTER KEY IS FOR SISSIES
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TugBoat on August 29, 2012, 04:24:01 am
Alright in all honesty, Smoothrich says some pretty hilarious but hurtful things at times. Even then, the most damning things ive seen him say are what was in that TS chat. Im not even going to fault him for that since as a former admin seeing and talking with many other admins in the past, I know much worse things have been said when speaking candidly or freely outside of these forums. He's highly opinionated and people's opinions can really suck at times, but hey, we are all entitled to them right? And I know people want to bring in that whole "Oh hes an admin and hes expected to adhere to a higher standard of conduct while setting a good example for everyone on these forums." I say bullshit to that. This isn't the blizzard administrative staff we are talking about here. This isn't even a paying job. Whats more, the admin position as a  whole is already plagued with inactivity and indecisiveness and in some cases blatant favoritism.  On top of that, while ive met plenty of cool people, this is still one of the shittiest communities ive been a part of in a long time. I dont think the turkish trolls are going to be any less unbearable if they have the shining beacon of immaculate admin conduct constantly showering down upon them. I don't think other shit posters are going to stop from posting gems like "shitty NA's being shitty, get owned, amerifats" or "heh daily NA drama thread  :lol:" just because the in game moderators are always minding their P's and Q's. Maybe an admin's cool-headed response to the daily flood of idiotic complaints and tantrums from the average crpg player will cause said player to reflect upon their actions and straighten up and fly right? Maybe people on NA will stop saying shik is the reason for inconvenient server crashes during strat battles, thus making him the worst dev on the mod while shouting out "RETARD, THE SERVER" in IRC multiple times if he simply explains to them enough that it had nothing to do with him? Now, has smoothrich made some bad calls before? He certainly has, but I wouldn't say hes been any worse than some other, "good" admins. Just the other day Spookisland, a pretty infamous player was poll abused constantly in siege simply for being annoying in chat only to have an admin say "eh, if enough of the community agrees on it then it must be a valid reason for you to deserve it." This discussion went on in threads only to have the majority of the community telling spook to fuck off while supporting the admin.  Meanwhile, a guy had has admin removed before he even knew what was happening simply because he capitalized on a noob's mistake in the marketplace, despite him actually being a pretty vigilant admin all because one guy who happened to be a clan mate of the victim bitched and moaned enough to cause the devs to agree to remove this players admin. The inconsistency on this forum is pretty disgusting. I know I certainly wouldn't ever list the crpg dev team as a reference if I ever wanted to apply as administrative staff in any other online game/community. Im not even trying to defend Smoothrich here, but come on; at least give valid reasons pertaining to in game/actual administrative conduct to back your campaign for trying to deadmin someone(trust me, they are out there.) Don't do it simply because they said something that hurt your feelings in a sub forum that has nothing to with being an admin what so ever. That's incredibly thin-skinned and part of the problem with this community. This is all opinion ofcourse!

I respectfully disagree with your opinion in regards to this current situation, while agreeing with you as a whole.

Now, Smoothrich has said sorry and I accept that and have moved on.

However, lets say hypothetically he didn't apologize (he did, so this is just for argument's sake). He would have insulted me, insulted my family, accused me of being a racist while using racial slurs as if I were saying them. If someone said "LOL tugBOAT is a bitch" or something and they were an admin, that's not a big deal.. but when you accuse my parents of being cousin fuckers, which resulted in some incestuous hate filled spawn (me) while using racial slurs for emphasis, I think that's a bit too far. I'm not saying admins can't have fun, or that admins can't make mistakes, but they ARE held to a higher standard and should be expected to be a bit more well behaved than your average member of the community who lacks the responsibilities of an admin. Insulting someone's family is a line no one should cross. Racial slurs, which are hilarious to some people, can be ignored within the right context, but dont say them as if I said them. That's not cool. It was a very personal abusive attack. It's not just that he thought these things or was capable of saying such things, but the fact that he lacked the maturity or restraint or even intelligence to realize saying such was not appropriate is disturbing to me.

BUT he said sorry so it's all good now with me. :D
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on August 29, 2012, 04:40:37 am
Eh, I suppose we will have to agree to disagree. Admins being held to a higher standard is something I believe in when it comes to most communities, but not this one. There are already other measures put in place to counter out something like whats happening in this scenario on these forums. Getting really high forum warnings and not being able to post ,for a while can really suck, actually. Im also glad he apologized, but if that really was something worth removing admin for, would him apologizing about it erase the fact that he said it or make it any better? What if he'd been trolling about an issue that happened to you in game? Would it have been any better if he'd apologized for it after the fact?Like I said, we can agree to disagree on this, but I personally think an admin is entitled to their opinion just like the rest of us under these circumstances. Like I said, they arent being paid to do this, while being expected to represent their employers as a whole. They are volunteers on a  mod community that has an average IQ of about 50. I say so long as their conduct or personal opinions arent affecting their duty as an admin or violating the set guidelines of in game rules, then the ignore button should be more than suitable to solve any issue you have with them, especially considering how easy it is to talk to an actual dev regarding anything and everything else crpg related. Anyway, glad it got sorted out!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on August 29, 2012, 05:19:40 am
I never said anything about incest, or directly insulted your family.  I said that traitor revisionism is a manipulation/distortion of history used to lessen the pain of having a heritage that revolved around rejecting enlightenment principles and killing hundreds of thousands of innocents in order to protect the wealthy and damn the weak.

If you try to argue the CSA was about states rights, limited government, or was popular with people for reasons other then concentrated wealth and power to slave owners, then you are either misinformed (most likely) or racist (sadly true with many people.) 

I slapped all of the reasons one could praise the CSA together in one of my posts directing it at you, as a demonstration that the CSA is associated with all of those qualities.  If you aren't racist, believe in equality, respect the right of people to vote, enjoy having jobs and education, and believe in you know the natural rights of humans to live with freedom and justice and dignity, than you should never, ever type something that is pro-CSA.

If you don't want people assuming you could be racist, than I suggest you avoid pro-confederacy posts in the future.

Hey, just because I think einstein was a great leader and think Germany should've won WW2, doesn't mean I hate jews and slavs and wanted them all to die!  Even though one is the other.  Much like the CSA represents a belief in the inequality of man, the most unamerican of ideas.  Just so.

Primarily, I don't see how a debate of the ethics and motivations behind the civil war, divisions in race, and all of that can turn into being about someone adminning a video game server.  I ban griefers on siege, make sure strat battles go smoothly, and respond to ban requests on the forums or complaints in steam about the servers running poorly. 

Its a small community sure and players know each other more then a lot of other games but god damn.  People insult each other and over exaggerate their opinions on topics in any discussion board on anything daily.  Just go with it and either argue back or report the person if they go too far and stop talking.  I just post here when I'm bored for fun.  Nothing personal and nothing to do with being an admin.  None of my posts on this matter were even that dramatic or insulting either.  Don't take me personally man.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Galgorth on August 29, 2012, 07:06:07 am
I've never seen Smoothrich abuse admin powers or even come close to it.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Taser on August 29, 2012, 07:13:50 am
Well this was fun.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on August 29, 2012, 08:04:08 am
I've never seen Smoothrich abuse admin powers or even come close to it.

Ya thanks man, none of the complaints are ever about me being an admin, just people who think I can be a dick on the forums.  While true, I only start arguments with people who I think are posting stupid shit to begin with and should be called out to see them justify what or why they believe.

I've been an admin from day one of the servers and don't think too much of it, and in fact have a steam list full of cRPG people who contact me when someone is disturbing the servers and I help when I can.  Its a thankless volunteer position for a small community, but I enjoy the game, appreciate the dev and admin team, and have met some pretty cool people here and there from this game who I can chat with or play any other game and have fun.

Most posts here are just bitching about me being an LLJK troll and by virtue of that I shouldn't be an admin in the first place.  Many are EU players that have never even interacted with me outside of the forums or EU Strat battles where I goof off in chat.  Sure whatever to that, but you can believe when it comes to making the servers run smoothly I am as opposite from an emotional immature griefer as anybody, and me and all of the other admins have been selected and retained because we understand the rules, make unbiased decisions, and do what we can to make the playerbase happy on the very limited server selection we have.

One thing I don't like is insulting Shik or the other devs and blaming them for having poorly run servers.  The admin team we have is great, our admin forum is full of discussion to make sure we are always doing the right thing, and if anyone has a problem you just need to send a forum PM, use IRC, or add one of us to a Steam list and we will help you.  The only thing I think we need is a few more admins, especially on siege, so don't be afraid to apply and shoot Shik or me a PM on the forums or IRC or something if you are interested.  LLJK Trolls need not apply!


Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Lt_Anders on September 05, 2012, 11:40:13 pm
Huh how come Smooth is now negative? You are probably one of the only admins to have over 100 votes(NA) determining how good/bad you are. And now you're negative, though not as bad as Eyebeat.

Interesting.

210 votes. Someone is either really good, really bad, or just really active to be able to garner enough people to get off their lazy asses and come in here to vote for them.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on September 05, 2012, 11:59:12 pm
Smooth is one of the best admins to grace cRPG.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Emotion on September 06, 2012, 01:28:49 am
I heard he has a big penis.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Dexxtaa on September 06, 2012, 03:40:16 am
Best thread

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Uumdi on September 06, 2012, 08:15:51 am
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

john madden
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: FrugFrug on September 06, 2012, 08:32:54 am
Oh no! another chinese earthquake!

EBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Cyclopsided on September 06, 2012, 09:01:37 am
ebay
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: FrugFrug on September 06, 2012, 10:45:46 am




Typing "CA" makes the narrator say California! (my only discovery in this awesome game)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Cyclopsided on September 06, 2012, 05:16:07 pm
you forgot his most recent one when they patched it sire
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Gurnisson on September 06, 2012, 06:02:16 pm
Best thread
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: FrugFrug on September 06, 2012, 08:04:18 pm
oh wow, didn't know about that update.  :shock:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Malaclypse on September 07, 2012, 09:48:23 am
The John Madden Moonbase National Anthem has been taken down, Uumdi. Never forget how it goes.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Uumdi on September 09, 2012, 03:21:00 pm
The John Madden Moonbase National Anthem has been taken down, Uumdi. Never forget how it goes.

EVERYTHING I LOVE GETS TAKEN AWAY FROM ME, hahaha

There was this video called Magical Butt Adventure, years and years ago.  I swear if somebody can scrape it from the bowels of the internet, I will make them a thank you card made of macaroni, with a 50 dollar check inside.  Favorite video of all time, hands down.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 29, 2012, 01:31:55 am
Smoothrich has the rapier-wit required to keep c-RPG safe from backstabbers, ne'er do wells and rule-breakers.

Razor-sharp man this fellow, would recommend again for Admin. With him around, no one can get away with anything!


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: genric on October 09, 2012, 05:07:10 am
People pointlessly posting in a ban request thread. Bans them for 24 hours. Massively hilarious to me and I say good job.
So did they get banned for 24 hours for every post so one guy got a 3 day ban?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 09, 2012, 05:18:08 am
I didn't actually ban them  :(

Just getting the point across that spamming shit like that is the wrong forum for it and makes my worthless volunteer work more time consuming getting through the posts.  They will probably get forum warning levels/mutes for it though.

As a rule we don't let posting here cross into in-game bans, except for the Supreme Overlords.  They are free to ban who they please. (free panos)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Jarlek on October 09, 2012, 01:47:54 pm
Why did you get muted, btw?

Diplomacy board?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 09, 2012, 03:49:24 pm
I was at 40 percent because of my jihadist posting in diplomacy, then Fallen_Son_Of_Odin went ahead and pulled the trigger because he is an NA hating bigot who moves any thread discussing NA players into Spam.  Just look at the spam section to see my act of civil posting defiance to oppose and depose systematic oppression of the NA community and the expected result.

viva la NA
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 10, 2012, 01:20:32 am
My apologies Smoothrich, I had no idea my report would be worth 40%
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on October 10, 2012, 01:40:17 am
How could you Tears.


HOW COULD YOU :(
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: genric on October 10, 2012, 01:43:00 am
My apologies Smoothrich, I had no idea my report would be worth 40%

I'm shocked it wasn't 100%

You underestimate your power tears.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on October 10, 2012, 11:25:42 am
My apologies Smoothrich, I had no idea my report would be worth 40%


Some men just want to watch the world burn.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: tizzango on October 10, 2012, 08:11:43 pm
sorry, EU community is really awful in this game and very quick to abuse polls, troll, teamkill you, and all these other things.  one of the main reasons new players don't stick with the game.

if you're stuck in EU and don't like having to play with the most insufferable people in any game ever, I suggest quitting cRPG now and playing a game without self-entitled, autistic, horrible people.

He posted this in a new players thread about an 'unfriendly community'. I replied with this:

"What a fucking ignorant comment. You don't play on EU so your opinion is ridiculously invalid. In addition, you are giving this new player a horrendously inaccurate view of the EU side, and what makes it worst is that he will look at your "Admin" title and believe every word you say." 

That's shocking behaviour for an Admin, hopefully you reflect on that and apologize. Don't come out with "BUT ITS THE TRUTH--- IVE BEEN PLAYING FOR 4 YEARSSSSS" that's a load of shit and not a valid reason to justify why you said that.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on October 10, 2012, 08:32:48 pm
He posted this in a new players thread about an 'unfriendly community'. I replied with this:

"What a fucking ignorant comment. You don't play on EU so your opinion is ridiculously invalid. In addition, you are giving this new player a horrendously inaccurate view of the EU side, and what makes it worst is that he will look at your "Admin" title and believe every word you say." 
He doesn't play on EU because the moment he goes EU he gets banpolled, I've seen him like get banpolled like a 100 times on EU rageball.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: tizzango on October 10, 2012, 08:39:01 pm
nvm
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on October 10, 2012, 08:39:30 pm
Smooth is god -- Once you realize this, you'll stfu.
He also gets rage polled by EU, so he has a legitimate claim.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: tizzango on October 10, 2012, 08:43:37 pm
Smooth is god -- Once you realize this, you'll stfu.
He also gets rage polled by EU, so he has a legitimate claim.

I appreciate you -1'ing my post simply because you like Smoothrich and not for the actually integrity of the post itself.

I don't see any other player besides Djavo get ragepolled frequently, so Smoothrich must be doing something wrong. I don't think there's a spontaneous global hate for the boy, and so must've done something to annoy people. He probably went on and just started flaming everyone in the EU side, but heres me assuming.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on October 10, 2012, 08:52:45 pm
I appreciate you -1'ing my post simply because you like Smoothrich and not for the actually integrity of the post itself.

I don't see any other player besides Djavo get ragepolled frequently, so Smoothrich must be doing something wrong. I don't think there's a spontaneous global hate for the boy, and so must've done something to annoy people. He probably went on and just started flaming everyone in the EU side, but heres me assuming.
No he didn't, he gets polled 'cause he's American and EUrs are jealous of his skills.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rikthor on October 10, 2012, 09:25:34 pm
He posted this in a new players thread about an 'unfriendly community'. I replied with this:

"What a fucking ignorant comment. You don't play on EU so your opinion is ridiculously invalid. In addition, you are giving this new player a horrendously inaccurate view of the EU side, and what makes it worst is that he will look at your "Admin" title and believe every word you say." 

That's shocking behaviour for an Admin, hopefully you reflect on that and apologize. Don't come out with "BUT ITS THE TRUTH--- IVE BEEN PLAYING FOR 4 YEARSSSSS" that's a load of shit and not a valid reason to justify why you said that.

So what you are saying is someone has a different opinion than yours and therefore you need to throw a fit like a baby over it? Just checking. I'm curious what action this relates to in-game? Oh wait, it doesn't relate to his actual admin duties. Stop being a baby because someone called EU servers something you didn't like.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on October 10, 2012, 09:26:17 pm
I appreciate you -1'ing my post simply because you like Smoothrich and not for the actually integrity of the post itself.

I don't see any other player besides Djavo get ragepolled frequently, so Smoothrich must be doing something wrong. I don't think there's a spontaneous global hate for the boy, and so must've done something to annoy people. He probably went on and just started flaming everyone in the EU side, but heres me assuming.

People really care about + / - ?
Well..
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: genric on October 10, 2012, 09:39:38 pm
I saw smooth in game and I had this overwhelming urge to raise my sword above my head and cleave him into two.
I don't know why I had this feeling and I can't tell if it was the fact that I am a good person that I didn't or because I would be banned faster then a left swing.
Other then that I haven't seen him be bias in his admin ship, a little bit of a dick in his posting but who read anyway.

On the EU side I have heard and read many times about EU polling constantly during games as opposed to the here where it is once a week maybe. And not EU is a nicer place because their version of spook got Essay banned.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: tizzango on October 10, 2012, 10:19:08 pm
So what you are saying is someone has a different opinion than yours and therefore you need to throw a fit like a baby over it? Just checking. I'm curious what action this relates to in-game? Oh wait, it doesn't relate to his actual admin duties. Stop being a baby because someone called EU servers something you didn't like.

No. He told the NEW EU player not to come on and play with us because we are all 'autistic' and all the other insults. Instead of being rational and saying; "Some people are trolls, some people aren't". As an Admin, he has the power to affect new players minds and steering them away from the game isn't good Admin'ing.

Nothing to do with having a different opinion than mine.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on October 10, 2012, 10:28:47 pm
I saw smooth in game and I had this overwhelming urge to raise my sword above my head and cleave him into two.
I don't know why I had this feeling and I can't tell if it was the fact that I am a good person that I didn't or because I would be banned faster then a left swing.
Other then that I haven't seen him be bias in his admin ship, a little bit of a dick in his posting but who read anyway.

On the EU side I have heard and read many times about EU polling constantly during games as opposed to the here where it is once a week maybe. And not EU is a nicer place because their version of spook got Essay banned.

Heard? Once i got polled like 20 times (not even joking) for having a name ''Aptalturk'' which angered lots of turkish players who polled me over 20 times in EU server.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on October 10, 2012, 10:36:13 pm
He posted this in a new players thread about an 'unfriendly community'. I replied with this:

"What a fucking ignorant comment. You don't play on EU so your opinion is ridiculously invalid. In addition, you are giving this new player a horrendously inaccurate view of the EU side, and what makes it worst is that he will look at your "Admin" title and believe every word you say." 

That's shocking behaviour for an Admin, hopefully you reflect on that and apologize. Don't come out with "BUT ITS THE TRUTH--- IVE BEEN PLAYING FOR 4 YEARSSSSS" that's a load of shit and not a valid reason to justify why you said that.

fuck you

smoothrich is the admin EU deserves
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 10, 2012, 11:21:59 pm
Funny how only a select few NA players are auto-polled on EU, I mean, even I have never been polled on EU and I make my entrance very... Let's just say everyone knows when I enter a server due to my abundance of enthusiasm.
fsmoothrich is the admin EU deserves
I disagree, he is the admin that NA deserves. Keep him out of EU and well inside of NA thank you very much, he fits in much better there and belongs there.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 11, 2012, 12:00:04 am
I wasn't even referring to myself, or NA players, being ban polled on EU, just how often they poll each other, almost always ban polls if they're enabled.

I obviously don't play on EU often, but I do a couple times a month.  Which is even more telling that I see at least a dozen ban polls on any server at any given time.  I don't think players would even argue that this doesn't happen.. EUs complain about the poll abuse constantly.

And yes, for a week or two I was unable to play EU Rageball, when I was enjoying the game mode a lot and only EU server would be full.  Cuz a couple players ban polled me on sight, and it was a server I never spoke in, with players I didn't know.  It was because I was an American.  The same thing has happened to me and plenty of people I know on EU_Siege, being ban polled for American ping with good scores (this is why Tears is never polled, he sucks at the game)

And yes, the community can be pretty awful, but the game is good.  That is what I was telling a new player, and almost every post in that thread agreed.  If anything, your reaction here is just proving my point further.  Quick to anger, no rationalization, blatantly biased towards my opinion becuase I'm American, no empathy, very rude.  You are exactly what I'm talking about.  Get out of my thread.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on October 11, 2012, 12:08:39 am
And yes, for a week or two I was unable to play EU Rageball, when I was enjoying the game mode a lot and only EU server would be full.  Cuz a couple players ban polled me on sight, and it was a server I never spoke in, with players I didn't know.  It was because I was an American.  The same thing has happened to me and plenty of people I know on EU_Siege, being ban polled for American ping with good scores (this is why Tears is never polled, he sucks at the game)
This, to both statements.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: mcdeath on October 11, 2012, 12:51:09 am
You are a terrible admin because you started a war with the hospitallers and you are losing...
Pathetic, Remove admin now pl0x
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on October 11, 2012, 01:04:20 am
You are a terrible admin because you started a war with the hospitallers and you are losing...

Wait what how does starting wars in strategus relate to admining?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 11, 2012, 01:07:34 am
Wait what how does starting wars in strategus relate to admining?

I'm pretty sure he's kidding, but someone actually did post in my Diplomacy thread that my behavior was unbecoming of an admin and I should be ashamed.  When all I did was post a thread announcing we were invaded and outnumbered, but would still win in the end.  I still don't understand  :?: :?: :?: :?:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tanken on October 11, 2012, 02:10:39 am
Wait. They actually gave you a 40% warning for when I pointed out your Jihad statement?  :shock:


Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 11, 2012, 02:13:03 am
Wait. They actually gave you a 40% warning for when I pointed out your Jihad statement?  :shock:


Something about gore being against forum rules or something.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Uumdi on October 11, 2012, 07:12:46 am
People really care about + / - ?
Well..


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


trade fame pl0x@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on October 11, 2012, 07:32:29 am

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


trade fame pl0x@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

LOL I remember this people would paid so much cash back in the days for their frame level
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: [ptx] on October 11, 2012, 07:33:09 am
I wasn't even referring to myself, or NA players, being ban polled on EU, just how often they poll each other, almost always ban polls if they're enabled.

I obviously don't play on EU often, but I do a couple times a month.  Which is even more telling that I see at least a dozen ban polls on any server at any given time.  I don't think players would even argue that this doesn't happen.. EUs complain about the poll abuse constantly.

And yes, for a week or two I was unable to play EU Rageball, when I was enjoying the game mode a lot and only EU server would be full.  Cuz a couple players ban polled me on sight, and it was a server I never spoke in, with players I didn't know.  It was because I was an American.  The same thing has happened to me and plenty of people I know on EU_Siege, being ban polled for American ping with good scores (this is why Tears is never polled, he sucks at the game)

And yes, the community can be pretty awful, but the game is good.  That is what I was telling a new player, and almost every post in that thread agreed.  If anything, your reaction here is just proving my point further.  Quick to anger, no rationalization, blatantly biased towards my opinion becuase I'm American, no empathy, very rude.  You are exactly what I'm talking about.  Get out of my thread.

Ahaha, oh please!

I have seen you and badplayer on eu_2. You didn't get banpolled, but you certainly tried hard to get that. It seems you do this for the sole reason to have something to complain about.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 11, 2012, 07:57:36 am
I'm not even talking about myself really, dude.  Whenever I play EU there are ban polls flying off on everyone nonstop, and if you look at their ban request forum you see dozens of reports daily of teamkilling, griefing, all this other malicious stuff towards each other.  Its a lot worse than NA, from my experience, or at least with more players means more trolls and griefers.  The ban polling is just something I don't get though, but its funny.

What have you even seen with me on EU_2?  I don't even grief or troll in game and hardly use chat.  I think you're just another hater like all the rest, shootin blanks in my thread hoping for some quick +1's by the Tears of Destiny's of the world.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: genric on October 11, 2012, 09:22:15 pm
+1 for mentioning the Naive king

Maybe cause EU just has so many more players thats why they have so much more trouble. We have in NA much less people I think so it's a lot easier to weed out the trolls but EU has the majority of the players (and nicer servers FAVORITISM) so more trolls in the woodwork.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Xscizorx on October 11, 2012, 09:31:17 pm
smoothrich #1 NA admin he go hard in tha paint
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oprah_winfrey on October 11, 2012, 10:16:57 pm
I'm not even talking about myself really, dude.  Whenever I play EU there are ban polls flying off on everyone nonstop, and if you look at their ban request forum you see dozens of reports daily of teamkilling, griefing, all this other malicious stuff towards each other.  Its a lot worse than NA, from my experience, or at least with more players means more trolls and griefers.  The ban polling is just something I don't get though, but its funny.

What have you even seen with me on EU_2?  I don't even grief or troll in game and hardly use chat.  I think you're just another hater like all the rest, shootin blanks in my thread hoping for some quick +1's by the Tears of Destiny's of the world.

I was leveling an alt (no clan tags) in the eu under 20 server and didn't get ban/kick polled. My ping also happens to be fairly low on EU (around 110), but as soon as I said something about being from NA, I got polled.

I think it is safe to say that I don't say much in game, and this was no different.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on October 12, 2012, 01:59:50 am
Good Sig makes all the reads better
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: genric on October 12, 2012, 03:41:55 am
I can't +1 you enough smooth.

I also hate you because I have to open everything else in a separate tab because I don't want to interrupt the song
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 16, 2012, 09:26:38 am
http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-%28official%29/temp-ban-on-spearyn/

shit admin
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Lt_Anders on October 16, 2012, 03:18:38 pm
http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-%28official%29/temp-ban-on-spearyn/

shit admin

Are you spearyn?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Blackzilla on October 16, 2012, 05:15:28 pm
http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-%28official%29/temp-ban-on-spearyn/

shit admin


Team wounds someone 5-8 times, gets banned and he bitches. Smooth is obv out to get him since he is in hero party and aderyn is a hospi. Please remove smooths admin powers.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Allers on October 16, 2012, 05:26:16 pm
smoothrich very nice man
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 16, 2012, 05:44:25 pm

Team wounds someone 5-8 times, gets banned and he bitches. Smooth is obv out to get him since he is in hero party and aderyn is a hospi. Please remove smooths admin powers.

It's more about smooth not being able to figure out what happened.

Decious was blocking me by purposly standing infront and attacking me as seen in his own screenshot. Maybe it was overexcessive to protect myself but that doesn't change the fact he was blocking on purpose and "bro ruling" aka griefing everyone else on the team. If i'm banned why the hell isn't decious?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Lt_Anders on October 16, 2012, 05:46:35 pm
It's more about smooth not being able to figure out what happened.

Decious was blocking me by purposly standing infront and attacking me as seen in his own screenshot. Maybe it was overexcessive to protect myself but that doesn't change the fact he was blocking on purpose and "bro ruling" aka griefing everyone else on the team. If i'm banned why the hell isn't decious?

learn to hit ctrl+insert or F12. It's HIS WORD AND PROOF versus YOUR WORD AND A FEW WITNESSES. Granted, you had people back you up(not clan mates either) who attested to the "bro ruling" of decius. He should get a WARNING for it, but that's why Smooth has a bad rating on his admin feed back. 51.5% dislike him 48.5% like.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 16, 2012, 05:48:05 pm
learn to hit ctrl+insert or F12. It's HIS WORD AND PROOF versus YOUR WORD AND A FEW WITNESSES. Granted, you had people back you up(not clan mates either) who attested to the "bro ruling" of decius. He should get a WARNING for it, but that's why Smooth has a bad rating on his admin feed back. 51% dislike him

I did have a screenshot actually, but i was looking at the ban section of the forum and nothing was posted like 10min after the incident so i removed the screenshot. bummer huh?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Rikthor on October 16, 2012, 05:49:47 pm
learn to hit ctrl+insert or F12. It's HIS WORD AND PROOF versus YOUR WORD AND A FEW WITNESSES. Granted, you had people back you up(not clan mates either) who attested to the "bro ruling" of decius. He should get a WARNING for it, but that's why Smooth has a bad rating on his admin feed back. 51.5% dislike him 48.5% like.

Smooth has a bad rating for trolling people while being an admin, not for his actual admin skills.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Lt_Anders on October 16, 2012, 05:54:41 pm
Smooth has a bad rating for trolling people while being an admin, not for his actual admin skills.

Doesn't matter WHY he has it, but he has it. Smooth and Eyebeat both have bad reps. THE ONLY NA ADMINS that do.(I think there might be 1 more, but he's got like...10 votes or something and it's not one you see play often)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: POOPHAMMER on October 16, 2012, 05:55:36 pm
smoothrich is one of the best NA admins
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2012, 05:58:22 pm
he said decius was body blocking rohypnol, rohypnol died in the screenshot and aderyn teamwounded the poster 4 more times until he died after rohypnol was already dead
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on October 16, 2012, 10:09:27 pm
he said decius was body blocking rohypnol, rohypnol died in the screenshot and aderyn teamwounded the poster 4 more times until he died after rohypnol was already dead

I can't believe no one else mentioned that.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Bjord on October 16, 2012, 10:24:41 pm
smoothrich is one of the best NA admins

agreed
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Teeth on October 16, 2012, 10:54:00 pm
The same thing has happened to me and plenty of people I know on EU_Siege, being ban polled for American ping with good scores (this is why Tears is never polled, he sucks at the game)
Bragging about siege scores, rofl.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Mechanix on October 16, 2012, 11:02:57 pm
Don't hate
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Bjord on October 16, 2012, 11:13:26 pm
yeah eu my old friend don't hate, americUHHHHHHH
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 17, 2012, 12:07:25 am
I can't believe no one else mentioned that.

can't believe noone notices the fact that decious was also teamwounding me after roh was dead.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Lt_Anders on October 17, 2012, 01:42:28 am
can't believe noone notices the fact that decious was also teamwounding me after roh was dead.

You reported him only once in your SS. he reported you 3 times.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Allers on October 17, 2012, 03:24:50 am
Surprised anders didnt report anyone since he takes screenshots of everything and always wants everyone banned
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: MrShine on October 17, 2012, 04:13:39 am
Smooth is a real American
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 17, 2012, 06:13:15 am
You reported him only once in your SS. he reported you 3 times.

wasn't aware it was a race, also was busy fighting him instead of pressing m
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 17, 2012, 06:40:51 am
 [6:31am]  <Smoothrich> admin sass is a 24 hour extension of ban
 [6:33am]  <arowaine> kinda abusing your power rigth there smoothrich
 [6:34am]  <Smoothrich> i don't want to disappoint aderyn's impression of me
 [6:34am]  <Smoothrich> as some raging admin abusing asshole
 [6:34am]  <Smoothrich> so i better do what he thinks ill do
 [6:34am]  <arowaine> hahah
 [6:34am]  <Smoothrich> unless u got 100,000 crpg gold aderyn
 [6:34am]  <Smoothrich> stones on market
 [6:35am]  <arowaine> omg
 [6:35am]  <arowaine> ban he
 [6:35am]  <arowaine> nigth all
 [6:35am]  <Smoothrich> just consider it a gift for strategus
 [6:35am]  <Smoothrich> cya
 [6:35am]  <Braeden> G'night Arowaine
 [6:35am]  <Aderynz> pretty such blackmailing isn't cool.

And now he's blackmailing? the fuck.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on October 17, 2012, 08:55:08 am
they're still on the market fyi.  just pointing that out.  its not like you HAVE to buy them.  anyone could.  just like anyone could be sending me more screenshots of you teamkilling right now.  after all, you are now a repeat offender.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Bjord on October 17, 2012, 09:21:49 am
Smoothroach is bad. Michael Jackson bad.

:oops:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on October 17, 2012, 09:50:13 am
they're still on the market fyi.  just pointing that out.  its not like you HAVE to buy them.  anyone could.  just like anyone could be sending me more screenshots of you teamkilling right now.  after all, you are now a repeat offender.

If i buy them can you make me a song?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 17, 2012, 10:07:25 am
If i buy them can you make me a song?


So you are telling me you have the money now to pay me that 50K that you owe me?


Oh and um, Smoothrich is cool, and stuff.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on October 17, 2012, 10:13:54 am

So you are telling me you have the money now to pay me that 50K that you owe me?


Oh and um, Smoothrich is cool, and stuff.

Ehm....NVM!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Aderyn on October 17, 2012, 10:31:21 am
they're still on the market fyi.  just pointing that out.  its not like you HAVE to buy them.  anyone could.  just like anyone could be sending me more screenshots of you teamkilling right now.  after all, you are now a repeat offender.

I guess the c-rpg photographer in me has to come out once again then.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on October 17, 2012, 11:11:24 am
I guess the c-rpg photographer in my has to come out once again then.

YOU THINK YOU'RE A  PHOTOGRAPHER NOW BECAUSE YOU PLAYED POKÉMON SNAP? NIGGUH PRIZZ.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: TurmoilTom on October 18, 2012, 01:06:43 am
If someone asked me where they needed to go to see mad nerds get owned, I would tell them to come to this thread.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: mcdeath on October 18, 2012, 02:57:14 am
Smoothrich has successfully gotten his people out of a war they were forced into.
WE WANT 4 MORE YEARS OF SMOOTH RICHES
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Miracle on November 01, 2012, 10:12:56 pm
Needs to play more and ban more people.  This was the best thread on the forum and it now seems quite dead.  Please return Smooth.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: mcdeath on November 02, 2012, 03:20:38 am
Start with any hosp nerd. If you need help Aderyn is a great choice
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Bjord on November 02, 2012, 04:10:30 am
Smooth, you made it. You're cool enough.

I hereby allow you to step foot on European soil. Make your kinsmen proud.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on November 02, 2012, 11:55:32 am
Fought Sandy and death and won.

Smoothrich = Cast Invincible spell ERRRRRRY DAAAY
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on November 05, 2012, 05:08:43 am
thanks for the appreciation everyone.  i love you all more than you can ever know.  i promise more rage in the future.  unban spook so i can reban him plz.

here is one of my favorite nonsensical sketches for your viewing pleasure

http://FunnyOrDie.com/m/7rj
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Kirbyy on November 17, 2012, 12:29:04 am
Always fun to chat him on steam, great admin too.  :D
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Artyem on December 08, 2012, 09:02:43 am
REVOKED
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Muki on December 09, 2012, 02:11:13 am
aw he muted again :/ Guess the raid in the diplomacy thread got ya
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Jarlek on December 09, 2012, 09:18:10 am
Smoothrich has a sexy voice. I wanna meet him in TS again :(
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Jack1 on December 12, 2012, 05:26:55 am
.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Havoco on January 21, 2013, 08:38:38 am
UNMUTE SMOOTHRICH!!!  Badplayer can't do all the trolling....
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: LordBerenger on January 21, 2013, 08:41:42 am
Smoothrich in 1 sentence.


Terrible admin... decided to turn off friendly banners for "better immersion" and TKed like 5 people in two rounds...
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Count_Curtis on January 24, 2013, 06:08:47 am
Surely im not the only one who thinks that if you have to forum mute an ADMIN, then clearly he shouldn't be an admin?

Its like having to ban chadz, its not really something someone in his position should get
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Duster on January 24, 2013, 07:16:22 am
Surely im not the only one who thinks that if you have to forum mute an ADMIN, then clearly he shouldn't be an admin?

Its like having to ban chadz, its not really something someone in his position should get

Way to take things at face value. Smooth's trolling in the diplomacy forums have nothing to do with his ability to maintain good order in the servers, he just happens to be quite good at both.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Darkkarma on January 26, 2013, 07:27:50 am
TY Smoothrich.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oohillac on February 16, 2013, 09:30:08 pm
Is now actively ignoring i-chat reports. Not even a generic adminchat warning to make sure people are not TWing. 

Remove this admin please.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Canary on February 17, 2013, 01:15:57 am
Is now actively ignoring i-chat reports. Not even a generic adminchat warning to make sure people are not TWing. 

Remove this admin please.

He currently cannot read i-chat reports because his rank is lower than what is necessary to do so.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oohillac on February 17, 2013, 03:18:32 am
Well he told me to "stop spamming ichat," so evidently he can.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 17, 2013, 05:57:50 am
He currently cannot read i-chat reports because his rank is lower than what is necessary to do so.
lol, seriously? Fucking awesome.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Canary on February 17, 2013, 06:14:42 am
Well he told me to "stop spamming ichat," so evidently he can.

He gets an error message every time someone types in it.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Cyclopsided on February 17, 2013, 01:51:23 pm
He gets an error message every time someone types in it.
10/10 good adminship canary by lowering his admin rank. Hilarious.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: mcdeath on February 17, 2013, 07:46:21 pm
From this point on I will use i-chat when I see Smoothrich playing
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 17, 2013, 10:36:40 pm
He currently cannot read i-chat reports because his rank is lower than what is necessary to do so.


Who's idea was this, and why?


What precisely can he do, then?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Commodore_Axephante on February 17, 2013, 11:07:23 pm
Poll is currently an exact tie!

Do ties go to the defender, like in D&D?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oohillac on February 18, 2013, 02:15:53 am
I am still sure he can read them.

I messaged in i-chat specifically related to the MB clan, and he reported back he's "more likely to believe an MB than a Fallen."  Evidently he can read the messages.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on February 18, 2013, 03:47:38 am

Who's idea was this, and why?


What precisely can he do, then?

My powers have never been stronger.  I shall ban all those who oppose me, and then sell your account logins to russians for paypal money.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Artyem on February 18, 2013, 07:51:11 am
It should really say something when an admin has to have his powers lowered far enough that he can't even (supposedly) read I chat messages.  If his trolling and inexcusable actions have had him get punished this severely, and there are several complaints about his (lack of) admin duties why even keep him as an admin?

I for one find it unfair and unjust that after all of the reports, complaints and punishments he still has the ability to flex his power over the poor innocent players of cRPG that want nothing but a fair and decisive moderator.  The only people I see defending his position are his clan friends, and more than just his strategus enemies are against him.

Answers?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Count_Curtis on February 18, 2013, 07:57:25 am
Smoothrich being admin is just a running joke in NA Crpg
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Cyclopsided on February 18, 2013, 08:08:02 am
upgrade smooth to level 4 admin so he is above the rest of us pleb admins


oh in other news smooth is back to full admin powers again to my knowledge
[[correct me if i am wrong]]
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on February 18, 2013, 12:37:00 pm
It should really say something when an admin has to have his powers lowered far enough that he can't even (supposedly) read I chat messages.  If his trolling and inexcusable actions have had him get punished this severely, and there are several complaints about his (lack of) admin duties why even keep him as an admin?

I for one find it unfair and unjust that after all of the reports, complaints and punishments he still has the ability to flex his power over the poor innocent players of cRPG that want nothing but a fair and decisive moderator.  The only people I see defending his position are his clan friends, and more than just his strategus enemies are against him.

Answers?

No, its almost only just Strategus enemies.  Most who've ever voted Bad in this thread was after I banned someone (or didn't ban) during a Strat battle and the clan would mass vote BADMIN in this thread because I made the Tough Calls that no one else could.  The past page is just crying by EU Fallen members who no one's ever seen in game and Tears of Destiny, who is basically the Frank Grimes to my Homer Simpson (and had a nearly identical self-destruction.)

I know how to deal with griefers and trolls which makes some of them turn around, man up, and behave like fun, usually very good players on the server, or burn out in a ball of raging troll glory and never return (rip spook).

I was temporarily lowered in admin rank for sticking up for the rights of every man, pointing out blatant malicious exploits and bugs in accounts and people who deserved to be banned, and calling out admins for making biased, unwarranted decisions that would negatively impact the community.  I kept it a little too real.

So yes, the admin who has more or less never made a bad call, with a keen sense of right and wrong, with half the community on his Steam list, responsive and considerate to people's problems, and making sure cRPG accounts don't fall through the cracks by bullshit bans of inconsiderate, foolish admins.

I said just remove my admin rights anyways, some of the decisions I've seen have made me want nothing to do with the admin group, because I believe in second chances, understanding mistakes, and getting to know the person behind the player, instead of treating them like cd keys of thousands of hours of game time to ban for the "lulz."

But then I logged into cRPG.  Within minutes people begin asking Smooth?  Can you stop the griefing?  The tking?  Within hours on Steam, I get people saying Smooth?  Can you help my account?  Can you troubleshoot?  Can you figure out why my roster in Strat was drophacked and find me justice?

So I said, give me my rank back.  I've given up on the admins here, but I could never turn my back on the players.  The community that makes the game great.  The community that needs an admin every once in a while.  The cRPG community.

Is that.. so wrong?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Artyem on February 18, 2013, 01:15:11 pm
You can attempt to sugarcoat it with the dragged out, dead, rotting, beaten horse of a story about how you only care about the players, about how you care.  None of it matters because we already know that you have a long history of admin malpractice and your constant 'raids' on the Diplomacy section have had you muted more times than Diggles or even Kesh at this point.  If it weren't for your current stance of power you'd have been banned a long time ago, I have no doubt in my mind that this is the truth.

I feel sorry for your friends like Duster who actually believe and listen to the hypocritical byproduct of your intrepid so called 'trolling' that you spew during your frequent journeys to the muted mans land.  You claim it's only your strategus enemies that complain, but last I checked you're not at war with Fallen, maybe the NA portion but certainly not the EU Coalition.  You can't just shrug them off because they're EU and they're "never seen in game", if they have complaints and have potentially witnessed your grief first hand, then who are you to say they're claims are wrong because you haven't seen them personally in game?

Smoothrich, when will you stop the griefing?  When will you stop the tking?  To quote Tagora who quoted Ghandi, "Be the change that you wish to see in the world." When you have consistently griefed, trolled, and apparently teamkilled several times yourself, how can you be satisfied with yourself by ending others grief?

Your heart may be in the right place, but until your actions match up with the general intent of any admin, you'll just be another troll.  The only thing keeping you different from those kids who read 9gag and assume they're the "gretast tr0llz evur lulz" is that you're in a position of power, and unlike those putrid "lawltr0lz", there is no easy remedy to the grief you cause.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Count_Curtis on February 18, 2013, 01:44:32 pm
he genuinely believes he is some sort of behind the scenes CRPG superhero, out to save the world from the evil fallens and there plots to ban everyone in Crpg
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: Smoothrich on February 18, 2013, 01:54:03 pm
he genuinely believes he is some sort of behind the scenes CRPG superhero, out to save the world from the evil fallens and there plots to ban everyone in Crpg

I'm not sure what Fallen has to do with any of this.  Besides being a group of griefers and shit talkers always trying to start trouble, much like I informed oohilac the other day when he was trying to get MB players banned for no reason.  Basically like LLJK was but unfunny and somehow even less skilled.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich
Post by: oohillac on February 18, 2013, 03:32:28 pm
I'm not sure what Fallen has to do with any of this.  Besides being a group of griefers and shit talkers always trying to start trouble, much like I informed oohilac the other day when he was trying to get MB players banned for no reason.  Basically like LLJK was but unfunny and somehow even less skilled.

For no reason?  Any worthwhile admin would have at least put a generic "no TWing or trying to help enemy players," instead you blatantly ignore me, ignore the rule-breaking, all to earn a little egoboost and possibly impress your pals.

Again, remove this admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Muki on February 18, 2013, 04:12:00 pm
LOL the new title for this thread is hilarious keep up the good work smooth
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 18, 2013, 04:53:52 pm
2/10 would not admin
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: MrShine on February 18, 2013, 05:21:11 pm
Smoothrich has regained regular NA admin powers.  Ne'er-do-wells, you have been warned.

Also, in the spirit of this thread:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: mcdeath on February 19, 2013, 12:39:05 am
I say we just perma ban Smoothrich and give his admin to Farmer Nate
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Keshian on February 19, 2013, 04:46:29 am
[21:05] <Smoothrich> should I just ban kesh
[21:05] <Smoothrich> for multi accounting and item bombing
[21:05] <Smoothrich> ill gladly do it if no ones gonna cry abuse about it
[21:05] <Smoothrich> lol
[21:07] <Smoothrich> i think our investigation has given an endless amount of evidence and it is 100 percent guaranteed he is guilty of a plethora of exploits based on winning, showing terrible antisocial behavior on forums and in game to the community, having amassed tons of levels and looms from exploiting being on various servers at one time
[21:07] <Smoothrich> encouraging his clan members to pool him cD keys to manage them all.. posting on multiple forum account
[21:07] <Smoothrich> s
[21:07] <Canary> this item bombing is technically not one against the rules
[21:07] <Canary> it's the exploitation of a flawed system
[21:07] <Smoothrich> common sense
[21:07] <Smoothrich> i'd say
[21:07] <Smoothrich> yeah its an exploit
[21:07] <Smoothrich> lol
[21:08] <Smoothrich> its just one of so many things
[21:08] <Smo
<22:44:04>  [21:08] <Smoothrich> attacking with 3000 crates of trash gear is the same as transferring 3k crates and they attack it immediately anyways
[21:08] <Smoothrich> even if i was in the fief it wouldnt matter
[21:09] <Smoothrich> with kesh bragging about his plan to item bomb it + obviously being on bustys account while managing her strat army in hero party territory
[21:09] <Smoothrich> the bullshit meter is basically overflowing
[21:09] <Smoothrich> and besides being an "old time player" i see literally no way to defend him anymore
[21:09] <Smoothrich> + the hilarity
[21:09] <Smoothrich> will be amazing
[21:26] <Shik> 3 days of unread messages
[21:27] <Smoothrich> you can look up on tydeus's x-com Lets Play to a silent everwatching audience
[21:27] <Smoothrich> every few hours its just pages of his videogame diary
[21:27] <Shik> on topic
[21:27] <Shik> i have 0 objections to a ban against kesh
[21:27] <Shik> for real or imagined crimes
[21:28] <Smoothrich> aye
<22:44:21>  [21:28] * Muki_ (webchat@S0106001b116235c0.cg.shawcable.net) has joined #mount&blade-crpg-beta
[21:30] <Shik> http://mountandblade.nexusmods.com/mods/3935/
[21:31] <Muki_> looks cool
[21:31] <Smoothrich> yeah that was posted on SA
[21:32] <Smoothrich> i linked it here and jacko got mad that i didnt like any of the other maps posted in the scene editin gforum
[21:32] <Smoothrich> i was like lol who reads that
[21:32] <Smoothrich> goon cronyism only



How has this guy not lost his adminship??  he abuses his admin powers to help his side in strategus.  Also, shik - same thing.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Cyclopsided on February 19, 2013, 05:10:01 am
lol, this makes my day
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Keshian on February 19, 2013, 05:18:47 am
22:06] <Smoothrich> you just brazenly multiaccount in public
[22:06] <Smoothrich> and expect no one to notice or care?
[22:06] <Smoothrich> admins are really sick of it and have been for months
[22:07] <Smoothrich> becuase it skirts a grey zone of whats in the rules or isnt, but recent actions just blow any pretense of ambiguity away
[23:07] <Smoothrich> you are like a serial killer who has gotten away with it for so long he begins to have sex with his dead victims in public



This is the reply i got when i complained about his admin abuse.  How is smoothrich not banned?  Also, canary made his adminship level 1 and then shik goes right back and reinstates him to full admin powers because they are friends and been in the same clan for a long time.  Can we please get some eu help in removing the plague of cronyism in na admins?  Starting with shik and smoothrich.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Blackzilla on February 19, 2013, 05:19:50 am
[23:07] <Smoothrich> you are like a serial killer who has gotten away with it for so long he begins to have sex with his dead victims in public
22:06] <Smoothrich> you just brazenly multiaccount in public
[22:06] <Smoothrich> and expect no one to notice or care?
[22:06] <Smoothrich> admins are really sick of it and have been for months
[22:07] <Smoothrich> becuase it skirts a grey zone of whats in the rules or isnt, but recent actions just blow any pretense of ambiguity away
[22:07] <Smoothrich> you are like a serial killer who has gotten away with it for so long he begins to have sex with his dead victims in publi
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 05:51:37 am
This is not the place for chat logs, especially private admin chat logs that a legitimately corrupt badmin is revealing to the public, breaching the admin code of honor.

Kesh, every devil has his day, may you somehow find your way.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: mcdeath on February 19, 2013, 05:52:04 am
Well Kesh is obviously raging out hard on Smoothrich just because he was banned by him and he never liked him.



PS GF
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on February 19, 2013, 06:00:31 am
I'm not a part of this gay circlejerk between FCC and Hero Party, but Smoothrich, you really need to loosen your grip on this.  When it gets to the point where you're purposely turning a blind eye for your team who's exploiting, you've gone off the deep end and are just waving your admin dick in his face for the sake of it. (i'm talking about earlier when your team was shooting through stairs and you made the shitty excuse of 'LOL WELL THEY'RE EXPLOITING US SO WE'LL EXPLOIT THEM XD XD TROLED')

When it gets down to it, you're involving people who don't need to be involved in this, and because of it I don't really want to be in any battles against or with you guys if it's going to be a constant stream of NO FUN ALLOWED BECAUSE KESH.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 06:06:03 am
I'm sorry that "shooting through staircases" I'm not gonna go around banning people for during a Strat Battle, a random bullshit thing that people will do in any map they can.  I've been in countless sieges against FCC or other clans who break walls but the wall prop still exists and people pike and shoot through it while not being visible.  This is allowed.  The stairs were hit with catapults and the scene prop was identical, it could be walked out on one side.

If you think this stuff is broken, complain to the devs who changed the way catapults work.  As far as I'm concerned that is all working as intended.  Which is hardly working at all, but there you go.

Just rather funny to hear i chat flood with FCC people who whine about every possible fake or real exploit they see, when they are the most abusive of anyone.  Thanks for the morality lesson though, brah.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on February 19, 2013, 06:27:04 am
I'm sorry that "shooting through staircases" I'm not gonna go around banning people for during a Strat Battle, a random bullshit thing that people will do in any map they can.  I've been in countless sieges against FCC or other clans who break walls but the wall prop still exists and people pike and shoot through it while not being visible.  This is allowed.  The stairs were hit with catapults and the scene prop was identical, it could be walked out on one side.

If you think this stuff is broken, complain to the devs who changed the way catapults work.  As far as I'm concerned that is all working as intended.  Which is hardly working at all, but there you go.

Just rather funny to hear i chat flood with FCC people who whine about every possible fake or real exploit they see, when they are the most abusive of anyone.  Thanks for the morality lesson though, brah.
Again, there you go with your shitty eye for an eye complex.  WELL FCC DID IT SO WE CAN DO IT TOO, no, it makes you a horrible admin and a horrible player for stooping to that level and allowing it to happen.  You're so blinded by this absurd feud you've cooked up with FCC that you'll ignore that you have a responsibility to stop shit like this from going on and even encourage it, to a certain extent.

There's no morality lesson, it's simple facts.  You and Kesh are such crybabies that you'll go to any length to ruin everybody's fun on strat, as long as the repercussions go back to the opposite side and it's just fine to you.  I'm not defending FCC, I'm not defending Kesh.  This has gone far out of control if it starts to corrupt admins like this.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 06:33:44 am
Again, there you go with your shitty eye for an eye complex.  WELL FCC DID IT SO WE CAN DO IT TOO, no, it makes you a horrible admin and a horrible player for stooping to that level and allowing it to happen.  You're so blinded by this absurd feud you've cooked up with FCC that you'll ignore that you have a responsibility to stop shit like this from going on and even encourage it, to a certain extent.

There's no morality lesson, it's simple facts.  You and Kesh are such crybabies that you'll go to any length to ruin everybody's fun on strat, as long as the repercussions go back to the opposite side and it's just fine to you.  I'm not defending FCC, I'm not defending Kesh.  This has gone far out of control if it starts to corrupt admins like this.

I don't think you can really make an argument that smoothrich should have banned ~20-30% of the roster. Its the same logic when the cops bust a house party. They just tell everyone to leave, the don't start arresting everyone under 21 that is there.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Muki on February 19, 2013, 07:23:13 am
(click to show/hide)

Do wonder how you got those chat logs since that came from a private irc channel...
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 07:35:27 am
Again, there you go with your shitty eye for an eye complex.  WELL FCC DID IT SO WE CAN DO IT TOO, no, it makes you a horrible admin and a horrible player for stooping to that level and allowing it to happen.  You're so blinded by this absurd feud you've cooked up with FCC that you'll ignore that you have a responsibility to stop shit like this from going on and even encourage it, to a certain extent.

There's no morality lesson, it's simple facts.  You and Kesh are such crybabies that you'll go to any length to ruin everybody's fun on strat, as long as the repercussions go back to the opposite side and it's just fine to you.  I'm not defending FCC, I'm not defending Kesh.  This has gone far out of control if it starts to corrupt admins like this.

Dude.  It was like 2 people under stairs that got hit by a catapult.  So it was a one-way wall.  This happens in every other Strategus battle.  Almost every map is bugged and glitchy and some walls are literally impassable in one way and fine and seethrough in the other.  A few people shot arrows out of a stairwell at some point I guess and I-chat was flooded with rage sayign EXPLOITS PLEASE BAN, while our side had 3/4 of our gear unable to be spawned the entire battle due to FCC exploits.

It was simply ironic and I pointed that out.  We told people in TS to relax on using invisible walls, but I said I wasn't gonna ban anyone for it. 

Keep in mind we also had a TKoV player jump off walls with horses and go 3-60 and half our TS wanted to see him banned.  I said I'd rather not ban him, even if he is a Strat enemy, until we actually investigate what happened and take his word for it for the time being and assume he had a bad night.

I think you are the one blowing things out of proportion here man.  How did I ruin your fun by not banning half my team for shooting arrows from under a stairwell?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on February 19, 2013, 07:37:59 am
Remove Smoothrich as an admin but keep Kesh banned.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: LordLargos on February 19, 2013, 09:11:32 am
This is why smooth rich should resign like the pope.(keep in mind this is from Kesh's unban request as seen here http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-(official)/unban-request-kesh_ats/)
Anyone else feel like smoothrich should not be able to put admin input in on this thread considering it is regarding him? In fact I would like to call for the disposal of smoothrich's adminship. He has proved over the last several months his inability to maintain an unbiased and objective mind when addressing c-rpg cases where he is required to assume the role of admin that has been placed upon him by crpg community and developers. Smoothrich has blaintly shown his hate for kesh especially in strat and therefore is unfit to deal with any cases regarding him. In the most recent siege he turned a blind eye when his men exploited a hole in the ground by poking their heads out shooting(crossbows) then going back in to reload. If you have fallen into a glitched area you are allowed to be there but need to vacate as soon as possible within reason. These soldiers were clearly using it as an exploit and were not following rules. I am sure Smoothrich is famaliar with the rules and was aware of what was going on since they were under his command.
           Sincerely, HoC Lord Largos former Lord of Tshbittin, Commander of an Africa Korp Division and Former Champion of HoC.
              probably about to get banned for this
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 19, 2013, 09:38:05 am
...I'm not gonna go around banning people for during a Strat Battle, a random bullshit thing that people will do in any map they can...

But isn't that exactly what an admin is supposed to do in a strat battle? If you're not there to prevent exploiting (which this was) and griefing what are you there to do? Hell, it would have been better of you to at least tell your team to stop, but instead you encouraged their behavior. I thought admins were supposed to set examples of good conduct and civility, not demonstrate how the rules mean nothing when you know the right people.

I don't think you can really make an argument that smoothrich should have banned ~20-30% of the roster. Its the same logic when the cops bust a house party. They just tell everyone to leave, the don't start arresting everyone under 21 that is there.

Which would be understandable, if that's what Smooth did. Instead he encouraged them, which is equivalent to cops at a house party getting wasted and trying to hook up with co-eds.

I don't really care about the battle, I don't really care about FCC and HP and strat. What I do care about is how your personal feud with Kesh has led to abuse of power. You say he's a multiaccounter, but where's solid evidence? Even if he is, it's not your place to go and ban him for it, the dev team has handled all previous multiaccount bans on their own. The only solid evidence provided thus far has been from Kesh, and it shows that you banned him on speculation.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 19, 2013, 10:07:20 am
Just saying, but when I was banned for multiaccount/account-sharing with FIDLGB, I got banned by Meow because they had logged Rhalzo's IP logging into our strat accounts because we were lazy/busy. NA admins didn't even touch the shit. Policy isn't to ban somebody because they were a "known multiaccounter".

Sucks for Kesh, and the whole thing is fucked up from the core, but at least it's funny in a "LOL HE GOT BANNED" way. Way to show him who's
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
around here, right Smoothrich?

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Lennu on February 19, 2013, 10:19:00 am
Well, according to the poll you put up yourself Smoothrich you're not doing your job correctly as an admin. Time to change your behavior as an admin or maybe give up the job yourself.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 10:29:11 am
Well, according to the poll you put up yourself Smoothrich you're not doing your job correctly as an admin. Time to change your behavior as an admin or maybe give up the job yourself.

Yeah, a poll based on forum accounts has a suspiciously high new influx of downvotes after banning someone for using multiple cRPG, Strategus, and Forum accounts from one computer.  Democracy at work.

Kesh commanding in Strategus: 

Funny after you pointed out the biased voting against me, looks like people have come out overwhelmingly in support of my performance.  Thanks for all the votes guys.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 19, 2013, 11:58:59 am
It's funny that you keep pulling these accusations out of your ass but have yet to show valid proof backing your claims, and when someone brings up a valid point you suddenly seem to forget that you were debating with them...

"We don't need to use tactics against these spergs" - Smoothrich, his last words before losing against a small BIRD CLAN defense force.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: RamsesXXIIX on February 19, 2013, 02:10:32 pm
I think you need to choose Smoothrich.

Either you can troll like you're used to or you can be an admin. Not both, you can't handle the responsibility of being an admin while trolling.

EDIT: Also, the poll doesn't make sense. Smoothrich can change the options so at to make it look like the "no" votes turn into "yes" votes and vice-versa. He's done it a couple of times to confuse the votes and make it appear as if more people prefer him as admin than the opposite.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Lt_Anders on February 19, 2013, 02:59:06 pm
I think you need to choose Smoothrich.

Either you can troll like you're used to or you can be an admin. Not both, you can't handle the responsibility of being an admin while trolling.

EDIT: Also, the poll doesn't make sense. Smoothrich can change the options so at to make it look like the "no" votes turn into "yes" votes and vice-versa. He's done it a couple of times to confuse the votes and make it appear as if more people prefer him as admin than the opposite.

At the Edit:
The bottom has always been NO until recently I guess. I watch all the admins Performance ratings, his was second worst behind Eyebeat(who had a worst one when I last checked).

For those wondering were the multi account BS/"Proof" is just start here:
http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/bounty-in-crpg-gold-for-any-eu-person-attacking-smoothrich/msg725609/#msg725609
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 03:55:16 pm
At the Edit:
The bottom has always been NO until recently I guess. I watch all the admins Performance ratings, his was second worst behind Eyebeat(who had a worst one when I last checked).

For those wondering were the multi account BS/"Proof" is just start here:
http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/bounty-in-crpg-gold-for-any-eu-person-attacking-smoothrich/msg725609/#msg725609

Lol so he switched the options to make himself look better? Wow....that's low if true.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Ganner on February 19, 2013, 04:01:20 pm
I watch all the admins Performance ratings

LOL.

wow.

That comment just made my night, thanks.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 19, 2013, 04:02:09 pm
Lol so he switched the options to make himself look better? Wow....that's low if true.

It's true... because I voted No (bottom line) a long time ago, and tried to change it to Yes (top line) a while back, cuz my perception had changed. Luckily though, I am glad I hadn't changed it cuz he's imploding now, and I'm quite confident the truth will be leaked soon.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 04:04:21 pm
and I'm quite confident the truth will be leaked soon.

You are more right then you know.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 19, 2013, 04:07:27 pm
You are more right then you know.

Well, of course there are things that are not always seen unless it is right in front of us. The outcome doesn't look too good for you, but of course there may be things underlined that can be in your favor soon, as sort-of understood by your confidence. Best of luck to you.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 04:09:36 pm
Well, of course there are things that are not always seen unless it is right in front of us. The outcome doesn't look too good for you, but of course there may be things underlined that can be in your favor soon, as sort-of understood by your confidence. Best of luck to you.

Like the fact that no admin has come out and said it was an unjust ban?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Commodore_Axephante on February 19, 2013, 04:10:25 pm
If I were an admin who felt burdened by everyone's desire to see common glitches addressed during strat battles (no matter my rational for feeling that way, "everyone exploits them", "it can't be enforced", whatever) then I would... well, not want to keep being an admin.

Smooth, why exactly do you want to keep the position? What does it mean to you?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 19, 2013, 04:15:04 pm
Like the fact that no admin has come out and said it was an unjust ban?

Admins generally stick by admins... Kind of like the blue line of law enforcement. Christopher Dorner crossed that like, whether it was honest or not, and got kicked off the force. The brotherhood, blue line, admin line... is what matters to most people. Most everyone wouldn't cross it. I understand you are in the same clan as him and wish to stand by his side, even if the odds look weary. That's a friend if I've ever seen one. Time will tell, whether honest or not.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 04:40:52 pm
Admins generally stick by admins... Kind of like the blue line of law enforcement. Christopher Dorner crossed that like, whether it was honest or not, and got kicked off the force. The brotherhood, blue line, admin line... is what matters to most people. Most everyone wouldn't cross it. I understand you are in the same clan as him and wish to stand by his side, even if the odds look weary. That's a friend if I've ever seen one. Time will tell, whether honest or not.

Much like you and most of the people commenting on the matter, I don't know the whole story. The only thing posted on the matter was a snippet of chat logs from a private room in IRC. Without the full story, its impossible for me, you, and everyone else to tell what the odds are that this is a legitimate ban.

I will say this though, I have heard from admins that they have been in teamspeak with kesh while he was playing on clever. Also, for the first week or so that I was busty playing, I actually thought it was just one of kesh's alts. The later part doesn't hold much weight, but I do find it interesting.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Turboflex on February 19, 2013, 05:12:29 pm
where are cmp/chadz? this whole situation is a disgrace for a now professional company.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TurmoilTom on February 19, 2013, 05:28:55 pm
where are cmp/chadz? this whole situation is a disgrace for a now professional company.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 05:31:00 pm
where are cmp/chadz? this whole situation is a disgrace for a now professional company.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Lennu on February 19, 2013, 05:35:08 pm
Actually before making that post about the poll results I took a screen shot of it  :lol:
I think switching the poll option should be a reason to remove his admin rights, clearly he can't be trusted.
(click to show/hide)

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 05:49:31 pm
Actually before making that post about the poll results I took a screen shot of it  :lol:
I think switching the poll option should be a reason to remove his admin rights, clearly he can't be trusted.
(click to show/hide)

And I took a screen shot before you edited your post.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login




Wow.  I think this should be a reason to permaban you, clearly you can't be trusted.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: tizzango on February 19, 2013, 06:12:42 pm
(click to show/hide)

He actually did change it around, what a scallywag! I obviously initially voted no, anyone who isn't silly knows that this man isn't a good admin- I mean you can't put it much simpler than that.

If this is the type of admin M:BG will have, I will advocate to get my money back!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 06:16:08 pm
Fallen:  the clan that the devs actually had to intervene to wipe out their Strat armies becuase of the rampant cheating and exploiting, until half the dev team became Fallen members.  Then Fallen's enemies were all mass banned until they quit playing for exploiting and cheating, and they celebrated as justice.

Now one of their allies is banned for exploiting and cheating, and they begin showing Solidarity over it, calling it injustice. Fallen:  biased hypocrites?  You decide.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 06:17:36 pm
(click to show/hide)

He actually did change it around, what a scallywag! I obviously initially voted no, anyone who isn't silly knows that this man isn't a good admin- I mean you can't put it much simpler than that.

If this is the type of admin M:BG will have, I will advocate to get my money back!

Just out of curiousity, how do you know how good or bad Smoothrich's admining is if you are an EU player and he is an admin on NA? This can be directed at all the EUs posting here that don't play on NA.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 06:19:55 pm
Just out of curiousity, how do you know how good or bad Smoothrich's admining is if you are an EU player and he is an admin on NA? This can be directed at all the EUs posting here that don't play on NA.

Because in EU, only Russians and Polish cheat.  Everyone else is innocent of it.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tomas on February 19, 2013, 06:37:50 pm
I think there are a number of reasons why Smoothrich and Shik should now be removed as Admins (please note I am not talking about Shik's position as a dev here, just as an admin)

1) Accusing someone of item bombing because they have 3000 crates is wrong.  Our field armies have close to 500 crates and our Siege armies carry close to 2000.  3000 is therefore not unreasonable.  If the items were later proved to be absolute crap instead of siege gear then possibly there would be a case however item bombing is not in any rule set I have seen to date.

2) The following is plain wrong from any admin but especially wrong from a head admin
03:27 <Shik> on topic
03:27 <Shik> i have 0 objections to a ban against kesh
03:27 <Shik> for real or imagined crimes

Either this was a genuine comment or it was a troll post but either way it was used as "Dev" approval for the ban on Kesh.

3) Previous bans in this strat have been done in anonymous waves rather than by targeting individuals to maintain impartiality.  We were assured that the Grey Order and Union bans from before xmas were done anonymously and by a systematic approach yet now we hear that Admins and Devs are targeting individuals in opposing strat factions for investigation.  This makes a mockery of the previous investigations and brings into question whether the previous ban truly were impartial.  Alternatively it suggests that there is one rule for EU strat and another for NA strat which is equally bad imo.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 06:44:25 pm
1) Accusing someone of item bombing because they have 3000 crates is wrong.  Our field armies have close to 500 crates and our Siege armies carry close to 2000.  3000 is therefore not unreasonable.  If the items were later proved to be absolute crap instead of siege gear then possibly there would be a case however item bombing is not in any rule set I have seen to date.

The first tip off could be that Ahmerrad is flooded with shitty broken gear, tattered rags, and bent hammers. Also, every fcc army that came down here was XXXX troops, shiny army and a few crates. When they attack they are XXXX shiny army and 2-3k crates.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 06:44:46 pm

3) Previous bans in this strat have been done in anonymous waves rather than by targeting individuals to maintain impartiality.  We were assured that the Grey Order and Union bans from before xmas were done anonymously and by a systematic approach yet now we hear that Admins and Devs are targeting individuals in opposing strat factions for investigation.  This makes a mockery of the previous investigations and brings into question whether the previous ban truly were impartial.  Alternatively it suggests that there is one rule for EU strat and another for NA strat which is equally bad imo.

Yeah, most of the "anonymous ban waves" are a mockery of being impartial, because they are literally just targeting UIF players and just about no one else on purpose, because the people doing it are Fallen.  Every Fallen posting here is full of shit, which shouldn't surprise most people who see how the game is run and the amount of BS they get away with while their enemies are permabanned or deadminned as they are trying here.  Embarrassing and it is my opinion you should have no place as a dev in Strategus and have no input in these matters, because of your lack of impartiality and massive bias + prejudice against players over Strat politics.

Boy that's easy to say.  And probably a lot more accurate with you!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: mcdeath on February 19, 2013, 06:46:32 pm
All you guys defending Kesh and FCC are mad ignant if you think that they were right in what they did/are doing. Get brains you morons
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 19, 2013, 06:52:50 pm
The behaviour of both parties here is pretty terribad.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tomas on February 19, 2013, 06:55:42 pm
Yeah, most of the "anonymous ban waves" are a mockery of being impartial, because they are literally just targeting UIF players and just about no one else on purpose, because the people doing it are Fallen.  Every Fallen posting here is full of shit, which shouldn't surprise most people who see how the game is run and the amount of BS they get away with while their enemies are permabanned or deadminned as they are trying here.  Embarrassing and it is my opinion you should have no place as a dev in Strategus and have no input in these matters, because of your lack of impartiality and massive bias + prejudice against players over Strat politics.

Boy that's easy to say.  And probably a lot more accurate with you!

Good job i'm not a strat dev then isn't it.  I'm a Beta tester that had some conversations with chadz in the past and made some suggestions.  I make no decisions and have no special rights that allow me to do anything other than post opinions about specific individuals.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Thax on February 19, 2013, 06:57:31 pm
Regardless of your opinion of smooth you have to admit that Kesh got what he deserved. It was completely obvious that he was manipulating his gf's strat account and then accidentally posted on the forums under her name, its happened numerous times now and finally, he had to pay for it.

Good Job Admins.

Also....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Its like im giddy and hyped up on sugar from candy and quite a bit drunk.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Segd on February 19, 2013, 07:00:36 pm
1) Accusing someone of item bombing because they have 3000 crates is wrong.  Our field armies have close to 500 crates and our Siege armies carry close to 2000.  3000 is therefore not unreasonable.  If the items were later proved to be absolute crap instead of siege gear then possibly there would be a case however item bombing is not in any rule set I have seen to date.
Quote from: Kesh
Also, dbrookz only had 119 item types, the 3000 crates came from having 1000 ladders, over 1000 arrows, 400+ bolts, 31 csites, 700 cmaterial, and 75 siege shields and about 100 excess armor
Just looked at composition of our armies. Fully equipped army(2-3 types of horses, 3 armors, different types of boots & hands, 3-5 types of each melee class, arbalests, horns,rus, crossbows, normal & bodkin arrows, 2-3 ladders, s.shields, c.sites & materials) has about 20-40(max) types of items. Thats 3-4 times less than this guys used to siege poor Ahmerrad.

Btw, Smooth should have site messages about crap that  his city looted. Would be nice to look.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: tizzango on February 19, 2013, 07:03:15 pm
I wasn't even playing when all that stuff occurred. You are generalizing too much, I don't touch Strategus unless i'm transferring troops once every 2 weeks- not everyone plays this for Strategus man.

Also, you losing your admin rights will not effect the EU side of Fallen in anyway shape or form, and so, reverting to the whole "FALLEN R CORRUPT IN STRAT/THEY HATE ME IN STRAT" or whatever your pathetic argument was again, it is ridiculous and illogical.

@oprah_winfrey: I had it all written out but I simply cba with the drama, if you look through my previous posts and search "Smoothrich"- you'll see I made a post in here about how he insulted all of the EU players to a new player, inquiring about the community. He called all the EU players "autistic" and a bunch of other shit.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Keshian on February 19, 2013, 07:05:29 pm
The problem with accusing someone of item bombing without evidence is the second its checked you show how badly you should not be in a position of authority,  We bought an extra 300-400 ladders for army before they initiated the siege, 20 more csites, and about 300 more cmaterial (why gold in the city went up so much - those are expensive items unlike items in an "item bombing" would be).  Blondekhan and busty both came down with a bunch of crates but thousands of horses, we transferred the horses away before we initiated the attack which also increased the crate count since we didn't want to give horses for free. 

I should have copy pasted dbrookz gear (the one you accused of item bombing because he had 3000 crates), he had a completely reasonable amount of different item types (119), maybe even on the low end of number of item types armies have and it was pretty standardized as any of the people mercing for us could verify.  3000 crates?  Do you think he was trying to slow the city down with weight so it couldn't get away?  Item bombing is based on different item types and he only had 119 including siege equipment, some horses, and armors.  Furthermore, your ban was not on him, but on me without verification or proof of how I would be to blame for the this imagined item bombing.  How is this impartial?  Can we please get some impartial eu admins to look at this case, since its obvious and well-known smoothrich is heavily invested in getting me banned for personal reasons?

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 07:06:28 pm
@oprah_winfrey: I had it all written out but I simply cba with the drama, if you look through my previous posts and search "Smoothrich"- you'll see I made a post in here about how he insulted all of the EU players to a new player, inquiring about the community. He called all the EU players "autistic" and a bunch of other shit.

So in other words, you have no experience with smoothrich as an admin. Funny how that works.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 19, 2013, 07:09:55 pm
I think Smooth and Rohypnol finally blew the final fuse, just looking at this:

And I took a screen shot before you edited your post.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login




Wow.  I think this should be a reason to permaban you, clearly you can't be trusted.

how could you support this guy?  That's the kind of shit that anyone else would get at least muted for, but I doubt he'll face any repercussions at this point.  This games community just flew out of the fucking window and it'll stay that way until an actual dev and somewhat responsible admin steps in and intervenes in this mess.

(click to show/hide)
If this is the type of admin M:BG will have, I will advocate to get my money back!

That should be enough reason, he's immature and the only people supporting his decision are his equally corrupt admin friends and his loyal sheep clan mates.

Also, Egan, I understand you love Smoothrich and he's very kind and gentle with you, but I swear to god the way you post makes Pibb look halfway human.  He has no real evidence of multi accounting and his only other accusation is that Kesh was item bombing, and if that IS the case, you can't just ban Kesh for it because he's not in direct control of his clan mates.  Even if it was a legitimate reason to ban him, what about all of the other people who got item bombed before this?  I can't think of any other case where someone got banned for item bombing in a situation like this.

Ban Smoothrich and make PhantomZero an admin, PhantomZero is a dog in a suit and would probably make better decisions than Smoothrich.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 07:16:27 pm
And I took a screen shot before you edited your post.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login




Wow.  I think this should be a reason to permaban you, clearly you can't be trusted.

And this is our glorious admin at his best.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: tizzango on February 19, 2013, 07:17:25 pm
So in other words, you have no experience with smoothrich as an admin. Funny how that works.

What are you talking about?

I witnessed him trash-talking the entirety of the EU side to a new player to steer that player clear from playing on EU servers. Anyone with "Admin" as their title needs to be careful when they post, they can't talk/post like some typical troll when it comes to 'serious matters'. How can you not see that!? I'm genuinely shocked mate.

Not to mention, the countless other stuff he's done. If by Admin'ing you mean, his actions on the servers, you are right I don't have MUCH experience with that. To say that I can't amass an opinion of the way he Admins in general based on the stuff I read, is simply naive haha!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Keshian on February 19, 2013, 07:18:39 pm
And segd im sorry we are not as organized as drz, but we had about 12-14 different 1handers, 8-9 different 2handers, 10 different polearms (people requested four way polearms in addition to the normal pikes, long spear, bamboo spears), crossbows +1 and +3, arbalests +1 and +3, horn bows and long bows +3, horn bows +1, +3 and +1 bodkin arrows, +3 arrows, +2 and +0 steel bolts, normal bolts, the siege gear, throwing axes, and 2 other throwing weapons i forget which ones, 6 different shields, and we had some heavier plate like armor, +3 and +2 cav robes, lamellar vest, +1 peltastos armor, and +1 ragged outfits, similar number of types of helmets,a nd 4-5 boots types, and 2 horses types - this is all just off memory.  Anyone who has ever done a siege or organized gear for an attack - would this even remotely be considered what you would do to "item bomb" someone??

Not sure how he can ban me for something i didn't do myself, for a crime that was never actually committed and  other admins don't come back and override him - its your job, its obvious he is not acting impartially and thats what an admin is supposed to do.

At the very least just look at the inventory if you are a developer and unban me already, it wasn't even remotely an item bomb, his gear is screwed up because he hasn't cleared his city's inventory after 3 large siege attacks now.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: marcus on February 19, 2013, 07:20:47 pm
Remove Smoothrich as an admin but keep Kesh banned.

Only reasonable post in this thread.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 07:23:01 pm
And segd im sorry we are not as organized as drz, but we had about 12-14 different 1handers, 8-9 different 2handers, 10 different polearms (people requested four way polearms in addition to the normal pikes, long spear, bamboo spears), crossbows +1 and +3, arbalests +1 and +3, horn bows and long bows +3, horn bows +1, +3 and +1 bodkin arrows, +3 arrows, +2 and +0 steel bolts, normal bolts, the siege gear, throwing axes, and 2 other throwing weapons i forget which ones, 6 different shields, and we had some heavier plate like armor, +3 and +2 cav robes, lamellar vest, +1 peltastos armor, and +1 ragged outfits, similar number of types of helmets,a nd 4-5 boots types, and 2 horses types - this is all just off memory.  Anyone who has ever done a siege or organized gear for an attack - would this even remotely be considered what you would do to "item bomb" someone??

Not sure how he can ban me for something i didn't do myself, for a crime that was never actually committed and  other admins don't come back and override him - its your job, its obvious he is not acting impartially and thats what an admin is supposed to do.

What it sounds like is usable gear fitted for fighting, not trash you'd throw away. I'd think if you were to item bomb you'd just grab a bunch of shit gear. This does not appear to be what is happening here. But yes, definite item bombing.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 19, 2013, 07:32:33 pm
And the devs have said "deal with it" every other time someone complains about getting item bombed. It's never been ban worthy, and bans issued for strat offenses have always been issued by the dev team.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Harrys Oil Can on February 19, 2013, 07:35:06 pm
What it sounds like is usable gear fitted for fighting, not trash you'd throw away. I'd think if you were to item bomb you'd just grab a bunch of shit gear. This does not appear to be what is happening here. But yes, definite item bombing.  :rolleyes:
what about the broken hunting crossbows, normal hunting crossbows, broken hammers, broken rondel daggers, broken shortened military scythes, stacks of broken bolts and arrows, broken mauls, broken boar spears, broken two handed axes, 5+ different types of peasant body armors??? Anyone that played defense on these sieges saw all the crap your looking for. There is no secret why ranged or csites couldnt be used for half the battle. Anyone saying otherwise is a fool.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 07:36:27 pm
The item bombing isn't even the main thing here, its just a sideshow, even though its pretty much anti-fun.  FCC attacking within miliseconds of each attack ending so no gear can be managed, while bragging to mercs about making Ahmerrad item bombed, is just poor sportsmanship.  Its the multitude of other charges that have been investigated that really seal the deal on Kesh here.

Also I have noticed that the Fallen lobby here is basically like the Israeli lobby in American politics.  Pretty funny.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 19, 2013, 07:43:53 pm
Well Kesh is obviously raging out hard on Smoothrich just because he was banned by him and he never liked him.

It seems to me that it is Smooth who is spergin out hard. *shrugs*


Y'all need to hug it out, develop some bromances. Smoothbabe just needs a good hug and some nice luvins and he will be a nice admin and a cool person, I'm sure of it, someone should send him a bunch of Valentine's day cards to make him feel better.


The item bombing isn't even the main thing here, its just a sideshow, even though its pretty much anti-fun.  FCC attacking within miliseconds of each attack ending so no gear can be managed, while bragging to mercs about making Ahmerrad item bombed, is just poor sportsmanship.  Its the multitude of other charges that have been investigated that really seal the deal on Kesh here.
Oh silly Smoothbabe, you can't ban off of bad sportsmanship!


Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 07:49:25 pm
what about the broken hunting crossbows, normal hunting crossbows, broken hammers, broken rondel daggers, broken shortened military scythes, stacks of broken bolts and arrows, broken mauls, broken boar spears, broken two handed axes, 5+ different types of peasant body armors??? Anyone that played defense on these sieges saw all the crap your looking for. There is no secret why ranged or csites couldnt be used for half the battle. Anyone saying otherwise is a fool.

Well I've heard from multiple sources that a ton of the gear was old gear taken from Shik from previous battles they won, so that would explain that.

And the devs have said "deal with it" every other time someone complains about getting item bombed. It's never been ban worthy, and bans issued for strat offenses have always been issued by the dev team.

This times 100000.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: MrShine on February 19, 2013, 07:52:07 pm
2) The following is plain wrong from any admin but especially wrong from a head admin
03:27 <Shik> on topic
03:27 <Shik> i have 0 objections to a ban against kesh
03:27 <Shik> for real or imagined crimes

Either this was a genuine comment or it was a troll post but either way it was used as "Dev" approval for the ban on Kesh.

This was from a non-public IRC channel.  How Kesh got it is currently unknown, but it's not for public consumption.  By that I mean not everything should be taken seriously, since admins are still discussing stuff before reaching decisions.  So basically Kesh posted this because it makes Shik look bad, but really it means nothing.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Harrys Oil Can on February 19, 2013, 07:53:43 pm
Well I've heard from multiple sources that a ton of the gear was old gear taken from Shik from previous battles they won, so that would explain that.
Lol, why would shik have those items??? He had a 2k shiny army with plate not hunting xbows. I can understand a small amount of shit gear. But who is gonna trek across the map with that shit as part of a siege army?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 07:59:25 pm
This was from a non-public IRC channel.  How Kesh got it is currently unknown, but it's not for public consumption.  By that I mean not everything should be taken seriously, since admins are still discussing stuff before reaching decisions.  So basically Kesh posted this because it makes Shik look bad, but really it means nothing.

Yeah, and shockingly Tomas is one of the non admins who is always lurking in that channel without having any input on admin things, then mysteriously the log is leaked to kesh (with other peoples lines in the conversation removed) just to cause drama and Tomas uses it as a soapbox to demand Shik and I's dismissal.  I'm sure there is no connection.

Also, multiple people told me Kesh was bragging that his objective was to keep Ahmerrad locked down by attacking within miliseconds every battle while item bombing the city until no gear could spawn.  This is exactly what they have done, and are still doing.  Its just more exploits and abuse to ruin the gameplay, obsessed with winning instead of having fun.  The same attitude that drives people to multiaccount. 
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 07:59:50 pm
What are you talking about?

I witnessed him trash-talking the entirety of the EU side to a new player to steer that player clear from playing on EU servers. Anyone with "Admin" as their title needs to be careful when they post, they can't talk/post like some typical troll when it comes to 'serious matters'. How can you not see that!? I'm genuinely shocked mate.

Not to mention, the countless other stuff he's done. If by Admin'ing you mean, his actions on the servers, you are right I don't have MUCH experience with that. To say that I can't amass an opinion of the way he Admins in general based on the stuff I read, is simply naive haha!

By admining, I mean the way he uses HIS ADMIN POWERS. Not the way he shit talks eu on the forums. Im sure you could see the difference m8.

@artyem: I'm not really pleased with the lennu thing or smooth changing his poll options. As far as smoothrich's admining decisions prior to banning kesh, I tend to agree with them. In regards to the kesh, none of us know the whole story, none of us have seen all the chat logs, read the threads in the admin lounge, or even know if there are any. I do know that not a singe admin has come out and said that Kesh shouldn't have been banned, so it leads me to believe that there is more evidence out there then the chat logs that kesh has posted.
Title: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: Matey on February 19, 2013, 08:02:41 pm
Since the old thread is run by smooth who apparently changed poll options or something, and since it is full of votes from months ago when Smoothrich was arguably behaving very differently... it seems time for a new thread where the votes will reflect smooth's recent and current admin-ing.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 19, 2013, 08:03:24 pm
best drama in months
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 08:05:03 pm
You can post feedback about any admin on any server but do not create multiple threads for the same admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: bagge on February 19, 2013, 08:05:16 pm
Yes. Long live the just King Smoothrich
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: Matey on February 19, 2013, 08:10:23 pm
yeah the other thread is worthless when the admin being evaluated can manipulate it freely.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 08:12:15 pm
Yes. Long live the just King Smoothrich

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 19, 2013, 08:12:34 pm
Yeah, Smoothrich,  it's just more exploits and abuse to ruin the gameplay, obsessed with winning instead of having fun.  The same attitude that drives people to exploit admin abilities.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tomas on February 19, 2013, 08:24:49 pm
This was from a non-public IRC channel.  How Kesh got it is currently unknown, but it's not for public consumption.  By that I mean not everything should be taken seriously, since admins are still discussing stuff before reaching decisions.  So basically Kesh posted this because it makes Shik look bad, but really it means nothing.

I won't post the logs but I will point you (since you have access) at the conversation involving Smoothrich beginning at 03:51 and specifically at Smoothrich's quotes at 03:54.  You will note that clearly Smoothrich took Shik's words seriously enough to use them as proof of a "Dev decision" although when quoting he omitted the bit that makes Shik look bad.

As for who is leaking logs to Kesh.  I don't know who it is and it shouldn't have happened however that doesn't make Shik and Smoothrich's actions right. 
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 08:27:33 pm
I will announce a grand compromise.  I will resign as admin, as long as Kesh's account is escalated to a global ban, along with the accounts of Bangbros_Busty, Flying_Dildos, Texas_Obesity, and a full IP sweep is done of the other FCC members who are still questionable, along with finding out exactly how many accounts Kesh has accessed so they can all be globally banned.

I will sacrifice my privileges, my honor.. for justice.  That's all this is about.

I won't post the logs but I will point you (since you have access) at the conversation involving Smoothrich beginning at 03:51 and specifically at Smoothrich's quotes at 03:54.  You will note that clearly Smoothrich took Shik's words seriously enough to use them as proof of a "Dev decision" although when quoting he omitted the bit that makes Shik look bad.

As for who is leaking logs to Kesh.  I don't know who it is and it shouldn't have happened however that doesn't make Shik and Smoothrich's actions right.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 08:35:25 pm
I will announce a grand compromise.  I will resign as admin, as long as Kesh's account is escalated to a global ban, along with the accounts of Bangbros_Busty, Flying_Dildos, Texas_Obesity, and a full IP sweep is done of the other FCC members who are still questionable, along with finding out exactly how many accounts Kesh has accessed so they can all be globally banned.

I will sacrifice my privileges, my honor.. for justice.  That's all this is about.


Lay your account on the line. If kesh/dildos/any other fcc are muliaccounting they get global banned. If they aren't, you get global banned.

In other words, race for pink slips.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Keshian on February 19, 2013, 08:37:01 pm
what about the broken hunting crossbows, normal hunting crossbows, broken hammers, broken rondel daggers, broken shortened military scythes, stacks of broken bolts and arrows, broken mauls, broken boar spears, broken two handed axes, 5+ different types of peasant body armors??? Anyone that played defense on these sieges saw all the crap your looking for. There is no secret why ranged or csites couldnt be used for half the battle. Anyone saying otherwise is a fool.

The first attack was with the person who defeated shik with the leftover gear from that battle - he had attacked a poorly equipped village then we attacked him twice so they had gear that had been used several times and some peasant gear from the village mixed in.  Our first assault on the city was a probe where we catapulted a bunch of different walls to see which were weak.  We actually got rid of about 50-60 items from that army before the attack.  It was a leftover army we used to see if this city was glitched like the last one we attacked.  (And about carting it over - have you ever tried to sort gear with the shitty info tab?  most people don't want to waste the time of going item by item with me on what should most likely be gotten rid of - so I just tell them to sell any item where they have 5 or less of 1 item type)

Witchcraft's army had about 110-120 item types like dbrookz.  Hammers go with our longbow and rus bow users.  Items get broken after being used, hence -2, -4 with repeated use.  im sorry smoothrich didnt think to empty out the inventory after the the attacks on his city, but this happens to everyone, including us when we attacked hospitallers and we had to transfer gear to be run over and sold in a nearby village or to remnant when their castle got attacked by tkov - but the difference is they don't ban enemy side because they have the power to do so without any proper oversight.

Still not seeing where I, personally get banned, other than petty hatred of a bad admin.

And I said smoothrich fucked himself over by leaving his city - I said his items were going to get fucked up just by his failure not by any evil intent or action and i laughed about how stupid he was - thats very different from me saying that we were trying to item bomb or anything of that sort, its just stating the obvious of what he was doing by his failure.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 08:39:09 pm
There is like 4000 hammers in the city, there is not nearly as many long and rus bows.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: chesterotab on February 19, 2013, 08:40:22 pm
 For he's a jolly good fellow, for he's a jolly good fellow
 For he's a jolly good fellow (pause), which nobody can deny!

promote Smoothrich to lead developer, the community wills it.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Keshian on February 19, 2013, 08:44:49 pm
There is like 4000 hammers in the city, there is not nearly as many long and rus bows.

Lol we never had more than a few hundred hammers on any of our armies - so dont blame that one on us.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Gmnotutoo on February 19, 2013, 08:46:08 pm
I will announce a grand compromise.  I will resign as admin, as long as Kesh's account is escalated to a global ban, along with the accounts of Bangbros_Busty, Flying_Dildos, Texas_Obesity, and a full IP sweep is done of the other FCC members who are still questionable, along with finding out exactly how many accounts Kesh has accessed so they can all be globally banned.

I will sacrifice my privileges, my honor.. for justice.  That's all this is about.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Comments like this just prove how terrible of admin you have become. You're desperately bargaining now, because you realized you royally messed up. Man up, admit you let rage and hatred cloud your judgement. Maybe the Dev's will take pity on you.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 08:50:44 pm
Comments like this just prove how terrible of admin you have become. You're desperately bargaining now, because you realized you royally messed up. Man up, admit you let rage and hatred cloud your judgement. Maybe the Dev's will take pity on you.

I'm not desperate, I don't really care about Strategus, and I've never experienced rage over videogames in my life, except Call of Duty once or twice when I was much younger.  I'm an admin and I'm doing that job by trying to keep the game free of cheating exploits abuses and other things that we don't allow.  People just disagree because they are Strategus allies with the cheaters. 



Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on February 19, 2013, 09:05:29 pm
I'm an admin and I'm doing that job by trying to keep the game free of cheating exploits abuses and other things that we don't allow.
A few people shot arrows out of a stairwell at some point I guess and I-chat was flooded with rage sayign EXPLOITS PLEASE BAN, while our side had 3/4 of our gear unable to be spawned the entire battle due to FCC exploits.


I'm sorry that "shooting through staircases" I'm not gonna go around banning people for during a Strat Battle, a random bullshit thing that people will do in any map they can.
so your crooked idea of justice is appeasing anybody who is on your side of the battle, while ignoring the comments of everybody else who isn't on the side of those at fault?

k
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Commodore_Axephante on February 19, 2013, 09:11:33 pm
... a full IP sweep is done of the other FCC members who are still questionable, along with finding out exactly how many accounts Kesh has accessed ...

Wait, so an IP sweep is a process that reveals multiaccounting, that can and HAS NOT YET been done on Kesh? Then how the hell did you ban him for multiaccounting?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Gmnotutoo on February 19, 2013, 09:15:33 pm
I'm not desperate, I don't really care about Strategus, and I've never experienced rage over videogames in my life, except Call of Duty once or twice when I was much younger.  I'm an admin and I'm doing that job by trying to keep the game free of cheating exploits abuses and other things that we don't allow.  People just disagree because they are Strategus allies with the cheaters.

Are you that delusional that you can't even see your own hypocrisy? No matter how you spin your conspiracy theories there are logs of you sanctioning cheating for your team in a battle that directly effected your strategus faction. It wasn't just two people, there were 5-8 people in there for at least a 1/4 of that battle. If one team can shoot through a wall at the opposing team and the other team can't shoot back through that same wall, its a bug and should not have been allowed. The problem here is you even encouraged it.

As for your skewed allegations about multiaccounting, the Head Dev's are the ones in charge of governing that area. The fact that you had to ban Kesh means they didn't authorize it, you overstepped your authority and let your emotions get the better of you. I give Shik the benefit of the doubt that he was just trolling you, because that is a very Shik thing to do.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 09:20:46 pm
Smoothrich and Canary were both telling everyone to stop shooting through the walls in teamspeak.

Not that people should be doing it, but an easy way to avoid this if you guys stop catapulting the stairs that you know are bugged.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich - new poll to better reflect current times.
Post by: [ptx] on February 19, 2013, 09:23:09 pm
yeah the other thread is worthless when the admin being evaluated can manipulate it freely.
What? I thought everyone did that... :(
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 09:28:19 pm
I said man FCC are hypocrites, and I wasn't gonna ban anyone, but we made sure our players stopped doing it.  I wasn't even gonna ban a TKoV guy who jumped off walls like 60+ times because I wasn't sure he was intentionally griefing.

The head admins of NA, Shik and Canary, both wanted to see Kesh banned, along with various other admins who have contributed information over several months.  Most are just afraid of the bullshit whining people do over internet superstars like Kesh and don't want conflict or drama, even though they know he deserves to be banned. 

The person who investigates IP things, has simply refused to do this for Kesh and the rest of FCC for the entirety of this Strategus round, because of Internet Horses Bias (and possible pedophiliac urges distracting him) and just so happened to be a Fallen member, much like the people leaking these dev chat logs, shitting up the thread, notorious for abusing mechanics, and lobbying to get UIF banned for account sharing endlessly in the past.

Whatever happens, people who ruin small communities like this with nonstop exploits and cheating need to know these actions have consequences.  Dozens of UIF players got to deal with this, yet other clans get away with it scot free because of bizarre bureaucratic bias bullshit.  Justice will be had.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Uumdi on February 19, 2013, 09:38:38 pm
I think it'd be neat if we all touched butts.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Matey on February 19, 2013, 09:43:54 pm
Smoothrich...

1. pretty much all other leaders of Hero Party have left the faction or quit strat because they are sick of your sperging. therefore I am pretty sure you take strat more seriously than just about anyone, You probably also rage a lot.

2. Your compromise is stupid. The proper solution is to get a non-biased 3rd party EU admin or dev to handle the situation with Kesh. If they rule in favour of banning him based on EVIDENCE as opposed to people who hate him saying mean things about him, then it will stick and people will deal with it. Evidence could convince a lot of people. Either way though, YOU should not have issued the ban as you have a serious conflict of interests here. You should not be an admin if you can't figure that out. So the "compromise" should be to get a non-biased EU admin to handle this and to remove your admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Phantasmal on February 19, 2013, 09:47:25 pm
Can we be provided with some proof of these accusations then? If no one has run an IP test yet, should he not be innocent until proven guilty? I am not saying I don't believe you, but you're making it hard without providing any evidence whatsoever (it would also end this shitstorm).
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Nebun on February 19, 2013, 10:12:06 pm
i no longer play strat or crpg bla bla....

just received this link from friend for fun reading

Smoothrich, don't forget that Anti Uif fucked up their economy at the beginning of strat, because their brain couldn't work out new system. I don't remember if fallen thomas begged, asked or convinced chadz that something wrong with economy system and they changed it resetting all points too - which lead to them fixing their economy after reset, most of them even waited few days just to see how we spend our points and set our prices in fiefs, so they could repeat. NEW ECONOMY SYSTEM IS THE SAME AS OLD ONE, just before u needed 2 fiefs to buy from and 1 fief to sell in, and now u need 1 to buy from and 1 to sell to. Also before new economy change they had their prices set up to 25 right from the start which is bad for economy and they also used up their exta points in equip instead of prosperity.
UIF economy was about 3 times better, so they couldn't live with it and changed it during strat round :)) That wasn't enough so good info sharing tools made by wolves i think? and mass bans of UIF was next step.

As i don't care if i'm banned or not i'll say this: ban this damn idiot Thomas (or at list take away his access to devs) before he completely fuck up strategus for those that still play!!! He is so involved in playing strat that he will use anything possible against oposing side, unless they very weak. This FOOL has already done enough. STOP HIM NOW - SAVE A WHALE.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Count_Curtis on February 19, 2013, 10:22:59 pm
hey, wait, what?

everybody knows tomas is a nolifer tryhard, its smoothrich we are talking about
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 10:28:10 pm
I will sacrifice my privileges, my honor.. for justice.  That's all this is about.

(click to show/hide)

Wait, so an IP sweep is a process that reveals multiaccounting, that can and HAS NOT YET been done on Kesh? Then how the hell did you ban him for multiaccounting?

Hey man, assumptions and anger towards someone in Strat is proof.....oh wait.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Count_Curtis on February 19, 2013, 10:31:06 pm
l sacrifice my privileges, my honor.. for justice.  That's all this is about.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Nebun on February 19, 2013, 10:34:59 pm
hey, wait, what?

everybody knows tomas is a nolifer tryhard, its smoothrich we are talking about

Hes a damn retard i always wanted to say that. Him and retards like him mercs, fcc, ready to go beyond standard game mechanics just to survive. I need to draw a picture where mercs shaking with pants full of their shit coming to chadz with the list of people they want banned. Or fallen thomas touching him on the knee saying he will do ANYTHING to make bans happen, just like he did with great economy fix. Duped gold by Anti Uif in last strat just wasn't enough.
Next time thomas and mercs use ur ass and maybe ur army will get flying carpets.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 19, 2013, 10:36:55 pm
Hes a damn retard i always wanted to say that. Him and retards like him mercs, fcc, ready to go beyond standard game mechanics just to survive. I need to draw a picture where mercs shaking with pants full of their shit coming to chadz with the list of people they want banned. Or fallen thomas touching him on the knee saying he will do ANYTHING to make bans happen, just like he did with great economy fix. Duped gold by Anti Uif in last strat just wasn't enough.
Next time thomas and mercs use ur ass and maybe ur army will get flying carpets.


Wat...


This coming from DRZ, who did how many abusive mechanics well beyond "standard game mechanics" back in the day when you were, many strats ago, beating on FCC, not even counting all the other "things" you've done beyond Standard Game Mechanics?


Remind me again how many DRZ were banned for exploitation and other such things?


Nebun, you are an adorable little bastard <3
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on February 19, 2013, 10:39:34 pm
holy fuck eu strat has nothing to do with this thread, settle down now.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: tizzango on February 19, 2013, 10:42:12 pm
By admining, I mean the way he uses HIS ADMIN POWERS. Not the way he shit talks eu on the forums. Im sure you could see the difference m8.

Wait. So you think it's acceptable for an admin to shit talk the community to a new player by calling the community 'autistic', so long as he doesn't abuse his power of kicking or banning people?

Oh right, so you mean when he posts something and has the title "Admin", he is allowed to then lose his 'admin persona' (the mere fact that an admin needs to develop a persona is laughable)?

Someone who trolls like that should not have 'ADMIN POWERS' to abuse in the first place.

--

ALSO, When a new player goes to any community and they see someone with an Admin title, they immediately assume "This guy knows what he is talking about- i'll listen to him".

Now lets say you were running a community, and one of your NA Admins tells a new EU player not to play on the EU servers because it is filled with 'autistic' players (and whatever else he said, it was pretty bad), you would condone that?

Your telling me you would think "Ahh it's fine, so long as he doesn't abuse his server powers."
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Nebun on February 19, 2013, 10:51:53 pm

Wat...


This coming from DRZ, who did how many abusive mechanics well beyond "standard game mechanics" back in the day when you were, many strats ago, beating on FCC, not even counting all the other "things" you've done beyond Standard Game Mechanics?


Remind me again how many DRZ were banned for exploitation and other such things?


Nebun, you are an adorable little bastard <3

another dumb creep i forgot to mention :) maybe because all u ever did is bark on forum

i think 1 or maybe 2 drz got banned :0

we use cunning strategy tactics, not dupped gold magic, global bans or economy mechanic changes. chadz never liked us enough to give us this cookies, nor we ever asked

cmon doggy bark bark :))) and i'm going back to real world, at list i had a laugh
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 19, 2013, 10:57:35 pm
Wait. So you think it's acceptable for an admin to shit talk the community to a new player by calling the community 'autistic', so long as he doesn't abuse his power of kicking or banning people?

Oh right, so you mean when he posts something and has the title "Admin", he is allowed to then lose his 'admin persona' (the mere fact that an admin needs to develop a persona is laughable)?

Someone who trolls like that should not have 'ADMIN POWERS' to abuse in the first place.

--

ALSO, When a new player goes to any community and they see someone with an Admin title, they immediately assume "This guy knows what he is talking about- i'll listen to him".

Now lets say you were running a community, and one of your NA Admins tells a new EU player not to play on the EU servers because it is filled with 'autistic' players (and whatever else he said, it was pretty bad), you would condone that?

Your telling me you would think "Ahh it's fine, so long as he doesn't abuse his server powers."

I'm saying if I had the choice of someone who is going to be a nice guy on the forums and helpful to new players or good decisions on who to ban/unban/kick, I would prefer the later. Ideally you would want both, but admins aren't a paid position, so I'll take what I can get.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 19, 2013, 11:01:02 pm
I'm saying if I had the choice of someone who is going to be a nice guy on the forums and helpful to new players or good decisions on who to ban/unban/kick, I would prefer the later. Ideally you would want both, but admins aren't a paid position, so I'll take what I can get.

Take what you can get? There are a ton more people that play this game that would follow both lines and admin because they want to... not for pay.
Therefore invalid.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 11:06:55 pm
Take what you can get? There are a ton more people that play this game that would follow both lines and admin because they want to... not for pay.
Therefore invalid.

Didn't you scam clan mates out of cRPG and Strategus gold until they all left Remnants and the clan died?  Pro plays there champ.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 19, 2013, 11:10:25 pm
Didn't you scam clan mates out of cRPG and Strategus gold until they all left Remnants and the clan died?  Pro plays there champ.

lol you're in no position to continue to attack people; and to be 100% honest, I have no idea what you're talking about, but please... continue this story.
If you can conjure some facts too please. heh. Some name or something lol.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 11:12:14 pm
lol you're in no position to continue to attack people; and to be 100% honest, I have no idea what you're talking about, but please... continue this story.
If you can conjure some facts too please. heh.

Yeah, the guy with the troll face avatar and the 1000 posts in ban sections and feedback threads saying "~~BADMINS!1" to every decision is the man holding all the cards here.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Canary on February 19, 2013, 11:15:53 pm
Point of order -

These threads are just for discussion - zerging a thread telling how some admin is EVIL and MEAN does  not mean that admin will get fired.

Furthermore, the polls here are optional and do not actually have a bearing on the admin in question's position. Harping on how the poll got changed or how "most people agree" on something one way or another will not serve anyone. If you want to contribute something to the discussion then choose a different subject.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 11:17:11 pm
Yeah, the guy with the troll face avatar and the 1000 posts in ban sections and feedback threads saying "~~BADMINS!1" to every decision is the man holding all the cards here.

So do you have any proof or what you just accused Emotion of? Or are you just going to avoid the subject and resort to some unrelated insult as usual? Like if you're going to accuse someone of something like that at least have SOMETHING to back it up. This is getting pathetic...... :rolleyes:

Point of order -

Furthermore, the polls here are optional and do not actually have a bearing on the admin in question's position. Harping on how the poll got changed or how "most people agree" on something one way or another will not serve anyone. If you want to contribute something to the discussion then choose a different subject.

I don't think anyone thought us saying any of this would be a reason for him losing admin, people just decided to point out that he was so desperate to look better that he switched the poll options.....doesn't get much lower then that.  :| Plus I'm sure people are hoping all this attention will cause someone of power to look into this big mess because some really, really stupid decisions have been made here.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 19, 2013, 11:17:47 pm
Point of order -


I don't think anyone is expecting him to be fired purely on negative comments, we are just having a rather enthused discussion by parties who like Smooth babe and parties who do not.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 19, 2013, 11:18:09 pm
Yeah, the guy with the troll face avatar and the 1000 posts in ban sections and feedback threads saying "~~BADMINS!1" to every decision is the man holding all the cards here.

Haha are you kidding? Click on my forum name. I have 503 posts total. Wow you do just make shit up off the top of your head don't you?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 11:19:34 pm
So do you have any proof or what you just accused Emotion of? Or are you just going to avoid the subject and resort to some unrelated insult as usual? Like if you're going to accuse someone of something like that at least have SOMETHING to back it up. This is getting pathetic...... :rolleyes:

Hey it's my thread.  No one invited you all here. 

If i had any more proof I'd be too toxic to drink.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: tizzango on February 19, 2013, 11:19:47 pm
I'm saying if I had the choice of someone who is going to be a nice guy on the forums and helpful to new players or good decisions on who to ban/unban/kick, I would prefer the later. Ideally you would want both, but admins aren't a paid position, so I'll take what I can get.

I do appreciate rational argument, and not passive-aggressive shit posting- so I will apologize for my last post it was a bit condescending. I have nothing against you, and I do think you make some good points in your other posts (:mrgreen:), just to clarify.

I digress, I don't think it's too much to ask for players to be good in both aspects. A volunteer shouldn't need to be paid to stand by what he initially volunteered for, I think anyway.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 11:23:23 pm
Hey it's my thread.  No one invited you all here. 

If i had any more proof I'd be too toxic to drink.

Lol and there it is ladies and gents. Instead of providing the slightest reason for this wild accusation, you avoid doing so and make a clever little comment to try and get the spotlight off the fact that you are now making wild accusation that you apparently create on a whim in that head of yours. It hurts me to acknowledge that you're actually an admin....
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 19, 2013, 11:24:09 pm
If i had any more proof I'd be too toxic to drink.
Mind sharing it then? This definitive proof?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 19, 2013, 11:25:54 pm
Mind sharing it then? This definitive proof?

Hey man, this is HIS thread. He can accuse anyone of anything without any basis for doing so. God Tears, smarten up will you, you're a damned king after all.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: DaveUKR on February 19, 2013, 11:31:39 pm
No matter what happens there with all the item bombing and stuff I'd say that it's completely inappropriate place to discuss Holocaust, calling entire clans names. When you call Druzhina, Mercs, Grey Order, Fallens or any other clan retards/cheaters/my old friends and whatsoever you just look the same as the one who says that all jews steal money, russians are alcoholics, black rob cars and so on. And it's extremely stupid to discuss something you have completely no idea about, you don't look wiser than those who discuss all the logically stupid conspiracy theories.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 19, 2013, 11:34:40 pm
well aint i a fuckin genius
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


smoothrich dont let them put you down in the mellows brother

stay strong

for america

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Carthan on February 19, 2013, 11:43:29 pm
Point of order -
This board is for admin feedback. You can post feedback about any admin on any server but do not create multiple threads for the same admin. These threads are just for discussion - zerging a thread telling how some admin is EVIL and MEAN does  not mean that admin will get fired.

Furthermore, the polls here are optional and do not actually have a bearing on the admin in question's position. Harping on how the poll got changed or how "most people agree" on something one way or another will not serve anyone. If you want to contribute something to the discussion then choose a different subject.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but, does this mean that these "Feedback threads" are basically admin blogs?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Duster on February 19, 2013, 11:46:07 pm
Furthermore, the polls here are optional and do not actually have a bearing on the admin in question's position. Harping on how the poll got changed or how "most people agree" on something one way or another will not serve anyone. If you want to contribute something to the discussion then choose a different subject.

Please correct me if I'm wrong but, does this mean that these "Feedback threads" are basically admin blogs?

Good job
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 19, 2013, 11:47:01 pm
Furthermore, the polls here are optional and do not actually have a bearing on the admin in question's position. Harping on how the poll got changed or how "most people agree" on something one way or another will not serve anyone. If you want to contribute something to the discussion then choose a different subject.

Please correct me if I'm wrong but, does this mean that these "Feedback threads" are basically admin blogs?

No of course not.  Your opinion on how ___ is a "baDMIn"  is very important to us.  Please give me another thousand views.  If this thread keeps going at this rate I will get a sponsorship with Google ads.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Commodore_Axephante on February 19, 2013, 11:56:13 pm
No of course not.  Your opinion on how ___ is a "baDMIn"  is very important to us.  Please give me another thousand views.  If this thread keeps going at this rate I will get a sponsorship with Google ads.

Dude, why so condescending? Does the office of Admin mean that little to you that you would spit in the face of anyone trying to promote any hint of transparency?

You, and Canary through his recent comment, have go so far as to essentially tell everyone that these Admin threads are a formality and hold no weight. That's pretty unsettling - you signed up for this job, so please take it seriously.

EDIT: Or, with no hard feelings, give it up to someone who will take it seriously.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Ganner on February 19, 2013, 11:56:48 pm
No of course not.  Your opinion on how ___ is a "baDMIn"  is very important to us.  Please give me another thousand views.  If this thread keeps going at this rate I will get a sponsorship with Google ads.

If you can keep this post rate up on this thread, you could hit the chaos thread in a few weeks.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 20, 2013, 12:01:29 am
You, and Canary through his recent comment, have go so far as to essentially tell everyone that these Admin threads are a formality and hold no weight. That's pretty unsettling - you signed up for this job, so please take it seriously.

Firstly, feel free to pay my my cRPG gold wages to make it a proper internet knights job. Secondly, going ahead with banning Kesh was me taking admin seriously, and look at the reaction it causes.  People only rage at justified bans on their friends and allies, and only think "good job" when people they don't like are banned.  Pretty much no one cares about right and wrong and the truth.

If you think everyone who posts in this thread is going to get a notarized response from the office of Smooth, Administrator Esquire™ then you need to help me find a cRPG desk secretary. 
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on February 20, 2013, 12:07:06 am
Firstly, feel free to pay my my cRPG gold wages to make it a proper internet knights job. Secondly, going ahead with banning Kesh was me taking admin seriously, and look at the reaction it causes.  People only rage at justified bans on their friends and allies, and only think "good job" when people they don't like are banned.  Pretty much no one cares about right and wrong and the truth.

If you think everyone who posts in this thread is going to get a notarized response from the office of Smooth, Administrator Esquire™ then you need to help me find a cRPG desk secretary.
i mean, we're calling you out on being a shitty admin, instead you're trying to be an unfunny internet hero, and when you do try and put a fragment of thought into it, you just blame it all on 'LOL THOSE WACKY FCC, PLS STOP GANGING UP ON HERO PARTY FCC SYMPATHIZER'

THESE ADMIN THREADS LOL
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Commodore_Axephante on February 20, 2013, 12:08:49 am
Firstly, feel free to pay my my cRPG gold wages to make it a proper internet knights job. Secondly, going ahead with banning Kesh was me taking admin seriously, and look at the reaction it causes.  People only rage at justified bans on their friends and allies, and only think "good job" when people they don't like are banned.  Pretty much no one cares about right and wrong and the truth.

If you think everyone who posts in this thread is going to get a notarized response from the office of Smooth, Administrator Esquire™ then you need to help me find a cRPG desk secretary.

Man, I've never talked to Kesh in my life, and I honestly don't care about strat outside of wanting fun battles - my entire reaction to everything that is happening in this thread is based on a somber read of just that - this thread. As an impartial observer it is beyond obvious to me just who exactly is trolling, and who is stating logical and informed opinions. So far, honestly, I have to put you in that former camp. I mean, you say not everyone will get "notarized responses" - but they do all get responses. Wasting-everyone's-time-acting-superior responses. You don't offer proof and you piss on everyone's requests for it, and then say nobody cares about the truth. If you weren't in a position of power, here, I wouldn't care, but I believe in integrity, especially from those who signed themselves up to lead by example.

If something doesn't deserve a response (and I agree with you, there is a lot of that in here), then don't respond. You're only digging this thing deeper when you fuel everyone.

But, obviously, you're into that.

Anyway, good luck everyone. I'm done checking this out. Jesus, I'm sitting in a hospital and even I'm finding this old.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 20, 2013, 12:09:29 am
Firstly, feel free to pay my my cRPG gold wages to make it a proper internet knights job. Secondly, going ahead with banning Kesh was me taking admin seriously, and look at the reaction it causes.  People only rage at justified bans on their friends and allies, and only think "good job" when people they don't like are banned.  Pretty much no one cares about right and wrong and the truth.

I wouldn't quite say that. There's some that do. If Kesh was multi-accounting and this was proven, then the ban was valid and I will happily accept that. But the manner you've gone about this has been horrible. CMP and the other high-ups always handled multi-accounting and had solid evidence behind it. You simply accused him of it, then avoid the subject when asked for any proof. And I don't think you have the ability to do whatever CMP and others do to check if someone is indeed multi-accounting. If this was handled as it SHOULD be, like other cases of multi-accounting, I guarantee the outcry would be nowhere near this level. Not to mention the logs that were leaked only weaken your case, if it's such a sure thing why not just prove it? And on top of all of this, I really don't think you should be involved with any actions towards Kesh whatsoever. Get a different admin who isn't getting fucked over by the guy on Strat. Like it or not, there's a lot of bias in this situation and that should never be the case when admins make take action.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 20, 2013, 12:23:54 am
i mean, we're calling you out on being a shitty admin, instead you're trying to be an unfunny internet hero, and when you do try and put a fragment of thought into it, you just blame it all on 'LOL THOSE WACKY FCC, PLS STOP GANGING UP ON HERO PARTY FCC SYMPATHIZER'

THESE ADMIN THREADS LOL

Yeah man, you were all for that dastardly Plague getting permabanned, because you didn't like him and praised the admins.  It happens to someone you like or feel ambivalent towards, and you rage and blame the admin(s).  You're a hypocrite and shockingly pro-Cheating.  I'm not trying to be a hero, just calling you out for being wrong.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 20, 2013, 12:26:35 am
Firstly, feel free to pay my my cRPG gold wages to make it a proper internet knights job. Secondly, going ahead with banning Kesh was me taking admin seriously, and look at the reaction it causes.  People only rage at justified bans on their friends and allies, and only think "good job" when people they don't like are banned.  Pretty much no one cares about right and wrong and the truth.

If you think everyone who posts in this thread is going to get a notarized response from the office of Smooth, Administrator Esquire™ then you need to help me find a cRPG desk secretary.
I would like to be your cradle, master.

I will take the words of your peasants, and turn them into laws you can enforce back on them.
I will take the weapons of your criminals, and turn them into a hammer of justice.
I will take the wickedness of your enemies, and turn it into a fiery passion.
I will take the milk of your whores, and turn it into wine.

I am yours, if you will be mine.
Oh Lord, hear my prayers,
let the all powerful Smoothrich take the reins of his steed,
and ride upon the wails of his non-believers.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Arathian on February 20, 2013, 12:26:46 am
Smoothrich, I used to respect you as an admin. I knew you liked trolling, who doesn't, but that ban on kesh is an absolute clear case of admin abuse.

Shame on you.

Sage
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Canary on February 20, 2013, 12:27:41 am
Please correct me if I'm wrong but, does this mean that these "Feedback threads" are basically admin blogs?

I will refer you please to Meow's feedback thread (http://forum.meleegaming.com/game-admin-feedback/(global)-meow/), which can more appropriately be titled "The Thread for Cat Pictures".

You, and Canary through his recent comment, have go so far as to essentially tell everyone that these Admin threads are a formality and hold no weight. That's pretty unsettling - ...

The weight they hold is determined through the action which causes the reaction, not the reaction itself. If by posting details of a certain scenario brings it (the supposed misdeed) to light, it is entirely relevant and will be taken into consideration by those who are in such a position to do so. The threads aren't useless, they're just not as indicative of failings as people seem to think. This statement from Smoothrich sadly tends to be very accurate:

People only rage at justified bans on their friends and allies, and only think "good job" when people they don't like are banned.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Arathian on February 20, 2013, 12:30:09 am
Canary, Kesh is neither my friend nor strategus ally (any more, in fact, some time now) but only a blind man can't see that this ban was BS.

Jeez.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 20, 2013, 12:31:08 am
Yeah man, you were all for that dastardly Plague getting permabanned, because you didn't like him and praised the admins.  It happens to someone you like or feel ambivalent towards, and you rage and blame the admin(s).  You're a hypocrite and shockingly pro-Cheating.  I'm not trying to be a hero, just calling you out for being wrong.

Yeah man, you were all for that dastardly Kesh getting permabanned, because you didn't like him and praised yourself.  It happens to someone you like or feel ambivalent towards, and you rage and blame the admin(s).  You're a hypocrite and shockingly pro-abuse.  I'm not trying to be a hero, just calling you out for being wrong.

And Canary, where is the justification? Where's the evidence? So far we've been told that it's been found by some nameless men and that it's definitely there, but we just aren't allowed to see it. If you want the outrage to stop, then show us the evidence and I'm sure we'll all calm down and agree that Kesh deserved a ban for multiaccounting (if he did).
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on February 20, 2013, 12:31:55 am
Yeah man, you were all for that dastardly Plague getting permabanned, because you didn't like him and praised the admins.  It happens to someone you like or feel ambivalent towards, and you rage and blame the admin(s).  You're a hypocrite and shockingly pro-Cheating.  I'm not trying to be a hero, just calling you out for being wrong.

I'm a hypocrite?  When in this did I say I was for Kesh or when did I exploit?  I'm pro-Cheating? I called out Plague for leeching (which the accusation is incorrect since I was for him getting banned because he broke a rule, not because of preference.) and I'm calling you out for encouraging an exploit in a strat battle. (OH WHOOPS WE'VE ALREADY BEEN THROUGH THIS BUT YOU DON'T CARE BECAUSE LOL FCC DID IT BEFORE)

Act like I'm blaming admins just to blame admins, but I'm not.  I'm blaming you because you're sitting on your soap box crying about FCC's unproven exploits, but then we have poor, little, victimized Smoothrich who just a few days ago was encouraging his team to shoot through stairs.  Look at yourself and tell me you aren't hypocritical in the slightest.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 20, 2013, 12:33:15 am

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 20, 2013, 12:35:32 am
You missed a spot

[15:07] <MrShine> [14:56] <Shik> Here's the plea deal: you tell us who leaked you the irc dev info and we'll shorten your ban [14:57] <Keshian> wow [14:57] <Keshian> you are sucha  bad admin [14:57] <Shik> yep [14:57] <Elmokki> mod has been dead for ages already [14:57] <Keshian> we really need cmp and meow and chadz tos tep in at this point
[15:08] <MrShine> you aren't going to get help from cmp on that one kesh
[15:08] == a_bear_irl  has joined #mount&blade-crpg
[15:08] <MrShine> it was his idea

(timezone difference obviously, this happened about 10 minutes later)

Now that cmp has global banned Kesh, does that make it more acceptable? Was that the proof you guys were looking for?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 20, 2013, 12:36:12 am
I think this is the first thread where tears might not be the most braindead poster in.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 20, 2013, 12:39:37 am
Smoothmin Bestmin
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: a_bear_irl on February 20, 2013, 12:46:04 am
plague/mercerex being banned was retarded, kesh being banned was retarded, smooth and shik banning kesh was the most transparent admin abuse possible and anyone who's looked at the diplomacy forum ever knows that

the NA admin team is basically the LAPD at this point, and canary is charlie beck

also i'm in hero party and im pretty sure fcc has 2k on its way to my castle as we speak
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 20, 2013, 12:51:15 am
Now that cmp has global banned Kesh, does that make it more acceptable? Was that the proof you guys were looking for?

This still hasn't shown me any tangible, undeniable, proof. It shows me that, undeniably, no one likes Kesh, and I think we all already knew that. And still, Smooth was the one who executed cmp's idea, the magnitude of which we (the general public) do not know. If it was: "we need to global ban Kesh for multiaccounting" then yeah, it carries a lot of weight. But if it was more along the lines of "damn Kesh is such a sperglord, we should just ban him" then it doesn't mean shit, because everyone's said that at some point.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 20, 2013, 12:53:36 am
This still hasn't shown me any tangible, undeniable, proof. It shows me that, undeniably, no one likes Kesh, and I think we all already knew that. And still, Smooth was the one who executed cmp's idea, the magnitude of which we (the general public) do not know. If it was: "we need to global ban Kesh for multiaccounting" then yeah, it carries a lot of weight. But if it was more along the lines of "damn Kesh is such a sperglord, we should just ban him" then it doesn't mean shit, because everyone's said that at some point.

Same proof that was presented when the drz/grey/union/autoblockers were banned. Slightly more actually.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 20, 2013, 12:54:57 am
Same proof that was presented when the drz/grey/union/autoblockers were banned. Slightly more actually.
but you see, it's different because like, smoothrich is an admin who said some things that might have been a little bit weird so thats bad and BAN SMOOTHRICH BAN  BANBNA BAN BAN

also, this is NA so of course we'll make a bigger deal out of it
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 20, 2013, 01:10:44 am
FREE KESH 2013
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tomas on February 20, 2013, 01:20:17 am
Same proof that was presented when the drz/grey/union/autoblockers were banned. Slightly more actually.

But for these the process of identifying who to ban was done anonymously to prevent bias.  The crime was defined before hand and turned into a filter by the investigator and everybody caught by the filter was banned and given the same punishment.

In this case we are told that Kesh was individually targeted for investigation and then the results were reviewed and an action taken by people who are known to dislike him.

Kesh may or may not be guilty of Strat multi-accounting, however the only way he should have been banned for it is if his account was anonymously flagged in a proper ban wave.  This is important because it not only protects players from biased admins but it also protects admins from biased player accusations.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 20, 2013, 01:26:22 am
But for these the process of identifying who to ban was done anonymously to prevent bias.  The crime was defined before hand and turned into a filter by the investigator and everybody caught by the filter was banned and given the same punishment.

In this case we are told that Kesh was individually targeted for investigation and then the results were reviewed and an action taken by people who are known to dislike him.

Kesh may or may not be guilty of Strat multi-accounting, however the only way he should have been banned for it is if his account was anonymously flagged in a proper ban wave.  This is important because it not only protects players from biased admins but it also protects admins from biased player accusations.
Be biased more.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 20, 2013, 01:30:05 am
But for these the process of identifying who to ban was done anonymously to prevent bias.  The crime was defined before hand and turned into a filter by the investigator and everybody caught by the filter was banned and given the same punishment.

In this case we are told that Kesh was individually targeted for investigation and then the results were reviewed and an action taken by people who are known to dislike him.

Kesh may or may not be guilty of Strat multi-accounting, however the only way he should have been banned for it is if his account was anonymously flagged in a proper ban wave.  This is important because it not only protects players from biased admins but it also protects admins from biased player accusations.

Where is the proof that they went through these steps?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 20, 2013, 01:30:37 am
That's pretty unbiased, in comparison to some of the other shit that's been spread here so far.


And of course he made a valid point, so I'm sure Smoothrich will either ignore it or switch topics on it now.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: no_rules_just_play on February 20, 2013, 01:30:58 am
Where is the proof that they went through these steps?
it was done by meow and the dev team. not by two admins that are known to be shitty and that are bff's
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 20, 2013, 01:32:43 am
But for these the process of identifying who to ban was done anonymously to prevent bias.  The crime was defined before hand and turned into a filter by the investigator and everybody caught by the filter was banned and given the same punishment.

In this case we are told that Kesh was individually targeted for investigation and then the results were reviewed and an action taken by people who are known to dislike him.

Kesh may or may not be guilty of Strat multi-accounting, however the only way he should have been banned for it is if his account was anonymously flagged in a proper ban wave.  This is important because it not only protects players from biased admins but it also protects admins from biased player accusations.
Ummm what? You realize how stupid this sounds right? In fact, if any moderator, admin or developer feels that someone is cheating they should investigate it fully. It doesn't matter who, or what they're suspected of. It's not bias, nor should the only way to be banned for multi-accounting be by anonymously flagging in a wave. I can't even form a proper argument against this because I can't see any sensible reason why you wouldn't, at times, do an individual investigation.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 20, 2013, 01:38:06 am
I would like to be your cradle, master.

I will take the words of your peasants, and turn them into laws you can enforce back on them.
I will take the weapons of your criminals, and turn them into a hammer of justice.
I will take the wickedness of your enemies, and turn it into a fiery passion.
I will take the milk of your whores, and turn it into wine.

I am yours, if you will be mine.
Oh Lord, hear my prayers,
let the all powerful Smoothrich take the reins of his steed,
and ride upon the wails of his non-believers.
My poetry is better.

You just made poetry suck, gg, it's like Smoothrich said, you  kill everything you touch.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 20, 2013, 01:42:21 am
My poetry is better.

You just made poetry suck, gg, it's like Smoothrich said, you  kill everything you touch.
it was more of explaining how much i like his attitude, and if he keeps doing shit like this im 100% behind him
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 20, 2013, 01:48:06 am
it was more of explaining how much i like his attitude, and if he keeps doing shit like this im 100% behind him
Well ok then, I accept that, don't get to close though, don't kill Smoothrich, or poetry.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 20, 2013, 01:51:20 am
it was done by meow and the dev team. not by two admins that are known to be shitty and that are bff's

yeah you don't know much lol
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: no_rules_just_play on February 20, 2013, 01:54:21 am
yeah you don't know much lol
so not being NA makes me blind?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 20, 2013, 01:58:44 am
so not being NA makes me blind?
Yeah, everyone knows Europe was invaded by eye eating aliens back in 1939, so yes.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Lt_Anders on February 20, 2013, 02:08:23 am
I know a bit more about this ban than others, and I'll say this.

Stop commenting and wait. Trust me. What we see here doesn't actually show what's going on in the background.  Just because smooth did it doesn't mean it wasn't supported, but at the same time, an admin with the horse in the race shouldn't be the final judge, and these admins know that.

The admins here are far, far less inept than you people try to make it out to be.

Just sit back, and wait. You'll get your verdict on this out come pretty soon.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 20, 2013, 02:26:59 am
Ummm what? You realize how stupid this sounds right? In fact, if any moderator, admin or developer feels that someone is cheating they should investigate it fully. It doesn't matter who, or what they're suspected of. It's not bias, nor should the only way to be banned for multi-accounting be by anonymously flagging in a wave. I can't even form a proper argument against this because I can't see any sensible reason why you wouldn't, at times, do an individual investigation.

The issue is that they claim to have fully investigated the situation, and have turned up conclusive evidence. Evidence that they refuse to release. Complicating the situation even more is that the two admins who say they gathered the evidence are Smoothrich and Shik, the two people who (arguably) hate Kesh the most.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 20, 2013, 02:28:56 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Lt_Anders on February 20, 2013, 02:30:11 am
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 20, 2013, 02:34:21 am
(click to show/hide)

I hope you have a happy birthday, Anders.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 20, 2013, 02:39:27 am
I know a bit more about this ban than others, and I'll say this.

Stop commenting and wait. Trust me. What we see here doesn't actually show what's going on in the background.  Just because smooth did it doesn't mean it wasn't supported, but at the same time, an admin with the horse in the race shouldn't be the final judge, and these admins know that.

The admins here are far, far less inept than you people try to make it out to be.

Just sit back, and wait. You'll get your verdict on this out come pretty soon.


6:30 PM <Shik> smooth's ban makes no sense
6:31 PM <Shik> but the other ban is important to confirm the identity of the mole



Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on February 20, 2013, 03:29:56 am
The fall of a righteous ruler:

(click to show/hide)
That's how you do it Kreczor.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Turboflex on February 20, 2013, 03:35:38 am
So they're gonna perm ban kesh just cuz he posted the logs of the admin irc channel lol,  cuz he embarrassed you guys by exposing what a bunch of clowns you are. Who cares who the mole is 3/4 of the admins are clearly embarrassed about this and so should the devs' be especially chadz who just got 60,000 euros from c-rpg and is counting positive word of mouth advertising c-rpg players.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Cyber on February 20, 2013, 04:25:40 am
I remember back when i was like 13 I wanted to be an mod/admin everywhere to feel important and get some kind of a internet power trip. It would be nice if the admins in cRPG were just volunteers who are appointed to help out with moderating servers/forums but clearly that is not the case for some and their admin status is somehow strangely attached to their ego.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 20, 2013, 04:49:46 am
(click to show/hide)

Happy birthday Anders.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on February 20, 2013, 06:02:57 am
it was done by meow and the dev team. not by two admins that are known to be shitty and that are bff's

The "anonymous" checking of accounts meant checking only UIF accounts.

5:25 PM <REDACTED> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <REDACTED> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else


(from a while ago but whatever)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 20, 2013, 06:06:38 am
The "anonymous" checking of accounts meant checking only UIF accounts.

5:25 PM <REDACTED> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <REDACTED> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else


(from a while ago but whatever)


If only UIF accounts were checked, why did people outside of the UIF like the FIDLGB guys (Pale horsemen mebe was what they were called then?) get banned? Oh why do I even bother asking this again considering every time it is ignored  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on February 20, 2013, 06:07:23 am

If only UIF accounts were checked, why did people outside of the UIF like the FIDLGB guys (Pale horsemen mebe was what they were called then?) get banned? Oh why do I even bother asking this again considering every time it is ignored  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Exceptions to the rule rather than the rule.
Plus its alot simpler to automatically check for account sharing which is what FIDLGB did.

Multi-accounting is harder to check for, and is what many people in FCC and other clans do, but the problem is noone bothers to check for it because they are not UIF clans.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Segd on February 20, 2013, 06:16:41 am
Multi-accounting is harder to check for, and is what many people in FCC and other clans do, but the problem is noone bothers to check for it because they are not UIF clans.
Well:

From now on every clan on EU & NA is considered as UIF member.
                                                                                                      UIF ambassador Segd the Shitposter

Let the bans begin!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 20, 2013, 07:41:05 am
Exceptions to the rule rather than the rule.
Plus its alot simpler to automatically check for account sharing which is what FIDLGB did.

Multi-accounting is harder to check for, and is what many people in FCC and other clans do, but the problem is noone bothers to check for it because they are not UIF clans.

Well, you said it yourself, account sharing is against the rules and is somewhat easy to check for.  Multi-accounting is nearly impossible to check for, and using it as an excuse to ban someone is outrageous, especially when the evidence is nonexistent regardless of how difficult it is to detect.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on February 20, 2013, 07:46:20 am
Well, you said it yourself, account sharing is against the rules and is somewhat easy to check for.  Multi-accounting is nearly impossible to check for, and using it as an excuse to ban someone is outrageous, especially when the evidence is nonexistent regardless of how difficult it is to detect.

Would agree if other people who got banned for it got unbanned too (some UIF dudes).

Either unban everyone, or enforce the rules on everyone. Don't just pick and choose who has to follow them.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 20, 2013, 08:10:58 am
Would agree if other people who got banned for it got unbanned too (some UIF dudes).

Either unban everyone, or enforce the rules on everyone. Don't just pick and choose who has to follow them.

Well if their bans were based on no evidence and an assumption/hate for said player then of course they should be un-banned as well. But I still don't think that's a reason to keep Kesh banned if he didn't do anything. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Goretooth on February 20, 2013, 08:15:22 am
Well, you said it yourself, account sharing is against the rules and is somewhat easy to check for.  Multi-accounting is nearly impossible to check for, and using it as an excuse to ban someone is outrageous, especially when the evidence is nonexistent regardless of how difficult it is to detect.
yes kesh constantly posting on his other account and then deleting those post means nothing we should all just forget he might be multi-accounting hey it's cool no reason to be fair.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 20, 2013, 08:48:36 am
Would agree if other people who got banned for it got unbanned too (some UIF dudes).

Either unban everyone, or enforce the rules on everyone. Don't just pick and choose who has to follow them.

There's still a difference here, Kesh is accused of multi accounting which is owning and playing strat on more than one account personally.  UIF (and Pale Horsemen) is (were) accused and was (were) banned for account sharing between several players, which Kesh is not accused of.

yes kesh constantly posting on his other account and then deleting those post means nothing we should all just forget he might be multi-accounting hey it's cool no reason to be fair.

EU has a similar situation with Gingerpussy I believe, and I don't think Gingerpussy is banned, so why should Kesh be banned?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Matey on February 20, 2013, 09:29:19 am
i dunno if its kesh or trillian posting those things, but kesh and trillian are both real people who share a house and play crpg.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 20, 2013, 10:16:07 am
Would agree if other people who got banned for it got unbanned too (some UIF dudes).

Either unban everyone, or enforce the rules on everyone. Don't just pick and choose who has to follow them.

There was a fairly conclusive list if player names which were shameless multi accounts. Following the bans members of union and grey order confessed their guilt and afterwards were unbanned.

Drawing a relation between a systematic checking of accounts and the targeting of one individual by someone who clearly has a personal dislike of the accused is a little tenuous.

I couldn't say whether kesh was multi accounting or not, but clearly the way the ban was conducted was a shamble, especially in the follow up response by smooth.  It's really for that behaviour that I loose faith in those that run the show.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on February 20, 2013, 10:32:07 am
Drawing a relation between a systematic checking of accounts and the targeting of one individual by someone who clearly has a personal dislike of the accused is a little tenuous.

The Dev's refused to look up FCC members accounts after being asked for months by multiple admins (some of which don't have any bias towards Kesh at all really).
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 20, 2013, 12:12:37 pm
Would they do that without good reason?  They're hardly known for their communication skills.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kreczor on February 20, 2013, 12:18:53 pm
EU has a similar situation with Gingerpussy I believe, and I don't think Gingerpussy is banned, so why should Kesh be banned?

What? It's more like why isn't Gingerpussy banned. Kesh should stay banned regardless.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Knitler on February 20, 2013, 12:40:45 pm
168 for No, 169 for Yes .... he has to edit the votum soon ....

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Casimir on February 20, 2013, 12:47:01 pm
forum.meleegaming.com/global/unban-kesh_ats/msg726639/#msg726639 (http://forum.meleegaming.com/global/unban-kesh_ats/msg726639/#msg726639)

Seems fairly clear to me what the powers that be think of the situation. I look forward to seeing the outcome of this.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Ex-Lord of Admins, Ex-God of cRPG. Say farewell within
Post by: Freland on February 20, 2013, 02:39:38 pm
Rejoice free people of Calradia:
If by a higher standard you mean the fact that Smoothrich was already being probated for egregious bans (one against badplayer) and that he has since lost admin, then I'd say we're on track, here.

Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 20, 2013, 02:42:52 pm
SMOOTHRICH LOST ADMIN RIGHTS! GLORY TO THE PEOPLE! DEMOCRACY! AMERICA! A WIN FOR THE WORLD!

(finally)
hopefully it stay's as such.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Commodore_Axephante on February 20, 2013, 02:46:30 pm
Guys, of course he lost his adminship. How could they promote him to Developer when he was still an admin?

(Yes yes, I know I said I wasn't going to read this thread anymore, but... wtf, man.)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Ninja_Khorin on February 20, 2013, 03:04:47 pm
In case anyone is wondering what's going on.

- Smooth's been dead-minned. At least for now.
- NA admins are furiously debating Kesh's ban on NA admin forums and going over the evidence presented. cRPG admins are semi-autonomous, which means that we don't normally interfere with bans by other admins.
- Also trying to find who leaked admin chat logs, because the chat is meant to be a private place where admins can discuss things without having to worry about their public image, same goes for the admin forums, except the admin forums are usually more serious in tone and actually contains effort and actual opinions as opposed to admin chat. Also someone presenting admin chat logs as if they actually represented actual opinions and not just random trolling is trying to inflame the situation even more, without discussing this with the admins. It also contains some developer chat that the devs might not necessarily want to see leaked.

Usually the admins aren't that unwilling to express their views in the open afterwards. Though, one difference with EU and NA is that NA uses the admin forum more actively and tries to think of a solution together, while EU admins do their own thing and discuss things more in admin irc chat or in the public forums.

PS. Anyone views represented here are to be taken as my limited info on the topic. I haven't been on irc since yesterday, so I'm out of the loop most likely.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 20, 2013, 03:12:18 pm
In case anyone is wondering what's going on.

- Smooth's been dead-minned. At least for now.
- NA admins are furiously debating Kesh's ban on NA admin forums and going over the evidence presented. cRPG admins are semi-autonomous, which means that we don't normally interfere with bans by other admins.
- Also trying to find who leaked admin chat logs, because the chat is meant to be a private place where admins can discuss things without having to worry about their public image, same goes for the admin forums, except the admin forums are usually more serious in tone and actually contains effort and actual opinions as opposed to admin chat. Also someone presenting admin chat logs as if they actually represented actual opinions and not just random trolling is trying to inflame the situation even more, without discussing this with the admins. It also contains some developer chat that the devs might not necessarily want to see leaked.

Usually the admins aren't that unwilling to express their views in the open afterwards. Though, one difference with EU and NA is that NA uses the admin forum more actively and tries to think of a solution together, while EU admins do their own thing and discuss things more in admin irc chat or in the public forums.

PS. Anyone views represented here are to be taken as my limited info on the topic. I haven't been on irc since yesterday, so I'm out of the loop most likely.

Thank you Khorin.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Artyem on February 20, 2013, 04:26:45 pm
The Badmin is dead.  Long live the Badmin!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: LordLargos on February 20, 2013, 04:35:18 pm
VICTORY IS OURS!
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Duster on February 20, 2013, 05:17:28 pm
Smoothrich's MOST NOBLE sacrifice led to the uncovering and permabanning of Kesh and his accounts, a victory indeed
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Count_Curtis on February 20, 2013, 06:34:54 pm
SMOOTHCUNT DEAD
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Freland on February 20, 2013, 08:06:06 pm
Meanwhile in Fallen headquarter:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 20, 2013, 08:54:51 pm
Now it's like Meow's thread, but instead of cats it's dancing. Mission complete.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Matey on February 20, 2013, 09:23:20 pm
In case anyone is wondering what's going on.

- Smooth's been dead-minned. At least for now.
- NA admins are furiously debating Kesh's ban on NA admin forums and going over the evidence presented. cRPG admins are semi-autonomous, which means that we don't normally interfere with bans by other admins.
- Also trying to find who leaked admin chat logs, because the chat is meant to be a private place where admins can discuss things without having to worry about their public image, same goes for the admin forums, except the admin forums are usually more serious in tone and actually contains effort and actual opinions as opposed to admin chat. Also someone presenting admin chat logs as if they actually represented actual opinions and not just random trolling is trying to inflame the situation even more, without discussing this with the admins. It also contains some developer chat that the devs might not necessarily want to see leaked.

Usually the admins aren't that unwilling to express their views in the open afterwards. Though, one difference with EU and NA is that NA uses the admin forum more actively and tries to think of a solution together, while EU admins do their own thing and discuss things more in admin irc chat or in the public forums.

PS. Anyone views represented here are to be taken as my limited info on the topic. I haven't been on irc since yesterday, so I'm out of the loop most likely.


well to add some more fuel.
about 3 or so other people have since posted logs from the same chat, but since they were random "lol trolling" things no one cares. Double standard? I realize one shows how awful smoothrich is an admin and how apathetic shik is towards his role as headmin, where the others show obvious trolling but its the same "crime" of revealing private chat logs. Also, banning people because "we think maybe they leaked info" is pretty much the worst. especially when the person who they identified (or who smoothrich and shik identified) happens to be leading an army that might take smoothrich's city away... gee seeing as smooth is obviously a trustworthy guy it seems logical to ban someone he thinks might have leaked info, even if that person might take his strat city away... HMMM.
anyways, this whole mess is a bunch of bullshit. I still want to see how it plays out but so far all signs point to things getting far worse instead of even slightly better.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on February 20, 2013, 09:32:36 pm

well to add some more fuel...
words words words

A bunch of admins have come forth to say that admin chat in IRC is a relaxed chat room, not a strict council. Shik was quoted out of context and the drama blew it way out of proportion. Don't push it as a point in your argument.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Matey on February 20, 2013, 09:35:43 pm
A bunch of admins have come forth to say that admin chat in IRC is a relaxed chat room, not a strict council. Shik was quoted out of context and the drama blew it way out of proportion. Don't push it as a point in your argument.

the thing is... they are trying to hunt down and lynch whoever leaked that "not important chat" even though multiple others have leaked random shit from it too. Also, I know shik, I talk to shik, I like shik and shik is apathetic towards his role. If you actually got shik to bother to come read this and ask him "would you like someone else to be headmin of NA?" I bet his answer is yes. shik would rather be trolling. He is a good guy but a bad headmin and I doubt he would disagree.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Smoothrich on February 20, 2013, 09:37:35 pm

well to add some more fuel.
about 3 or so other people have since posted logs from the same chat, but since they were random "lol trolling" things no one cares. Double standard? I realize one shows how awful smoothrich is an admin and how apathetic shik is towards his role as headmin, where the others show obvious trolling but its the same "crime" of revealing private chat logs. Also, banning people because "we think maybe they leaked info" is pretty much the worst. especially when the person who they identified (or who smoothrich and shik identified) happens to be leading an army that might take smoothrich's city away... gee seeing as smooth is obviously a trustworthy guy it seems logical to ban someone he thinks might have leaked info, even if that person might take his strat city away... HMMM.
anyways, this whole mess is a bunch of bullshit. I still want to see how it plays out but so far all signs point to things getting far worse instead of even slightly better.

I heard the Star Wars MMO is free2play now..
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Emotion on February 20, 2013, 09:43:16 pm
Hey smoothrich...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on February 20, 2013, 09:51:57 pm
the thing is... they are trying to hunt down and lynch whoever leaked that "not important chat" even though multiple others have leaked random shit from it too. Also, I know shik, I talk to shik, I like shik and shik is apathetic towards his role. If you actually got shik to bother to come read this and ask him "would you like someone else to be headmin of NA?" I bet his answer is yes. shik would rather be trolling. He is a good guy but a bad headmin and I doubt he would disagree.

They probably care about this incident because it was blown wildly out of context. Look how many pages of drama and garbage this whole debacle caused. It shouldn't be a big deal, but everyone made it into The Biggest Deal. Shik made a joke in poor taste inside of a "confidential" channel. It got leaked and made the situation worse than it was before.

Hey, remember that one time when Reagan almost started World War III?
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Oberyn on February 20, 2013, 10:03:48 pm
Smoothrich loses admin and Kesh gets banned? This is almost the best of all possible outcomes. Although Smoothrich eventually also getting banned seems inevitable, so there's hope yet.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 20, 2013, 10:05:52 pm
Smoothrich loses admin and Kesh gets banned? This is almost the best of all possible outcomes. Although Smoothrich eventually also getting banned seems inevitable, so there's hope yet.

Nah, if Digglez also got banned, then it would be perfect.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Kelugarn on February 20, 2013, 10:42:36 pm
Nah, if Digglez also got banned, then it would be perfect.

Looks like we have a lot of work ahead of us then.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: TheAppleSauceMan on February 20, 2013, 11:01:35 pm
I heard the Star Wars MMO is free2play now..

It is, but it has terrible fucking restrictions. I wouldn't touch it unless you're willing to pay. Yes I'm serious.
Title: Re: [NA] Smoothrich: Lord of Admins, God of cRPG. Praise Him Within.
Post by: Matey on February 20, 2013, 11:08:04 pm
It is, but it has terrible fucking restrictions. I wouldn't touch it unless you're willing to pay. Yes I'm serious.

i loaded it up. i tried to do the /flap emote (where you flap your arms around like they are wings). It is great fun to /flap while shouting BIRD CLAN. sadly you need to PAY MONEY to /flap.
So i closed it and haven't touched it since.