cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 06:05:59 pm

Title: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 06:05:59 pm
Recently my NA Strategus server was disconnected from strat, here are the facts:

chadz has stated that Classical(LLJK_Zealot) will be paying for a new box to run NA strategus on. The head admin will be shik.


Now i'm all for a new box titled official servers, but i'll be damned if I see someone who did this:
(click to show/hide)

or:
(click to show/hide)

or have said:
Quote
One of the silliest things I've done, in hindsight (Realized almost instantly a half hour later by me and everyone), I should have went by a different name, etc. But at least now I can play ball with Ecko, freedom.

Time to bring the servers dowj.

Is the smartest person to let own the servers?

I've run the NA servers for almost a year. Not once have i abused power. I have asked to make my servers official, and i have asked if there was anything else i can do.

So if shik knows soooo much about the NA community, lets let them vote. Whatever the decision, i'll roll with it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Reinhardt on July 14, 2011, 06:09:08 pm
With all due respect, as much as I dislike some choices, the official NA servers should be run by Ecko and his crew.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Paul on July 14, 2011, 06:09:17 pm
Gotta love NA polls. How about changing the second option to "chadz and Shik have full control over the server while Zealot only pays for it?"
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: chadz on July 14, 2011, 06:11:25 pm
If there's one external person that I'd first and foremost let the NA server run, it's Ecko. This is in no way an attempt to "overthrow" you or something.

But the NA community got weird lately. Lots of quarrels, lots of fighting, be it verbally or with actions. This is no good, not at all. So the offer to receive a totally neutral NA server was like the best thing that could happen. And I gladly accepted.

People claimed that we, the devs, didn't care for NA enough, and I think it was true. That's why we are looking forward to expanding our staff with NA admins and NA betatesters and whatnot.

Bottom line: it's better if strategus is run officially, than by a clan. Any clan.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 06:11:58 pm
Zealot wont be in charge of the server. chadz wanted to run the official NA servers himself, and Zealot is generously providing and paying for the box himself and giving it entirely to chadz to control, to run as he sees fit. Neutrally with admins he selects. I see no problem with that other then that you are throwing a tantrum. This is chadz show and his decision.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 06:12:23 pm
If there's one external person that I'd first and foremost let the NA server run, it's Ecko. This is in no way an attempt to "overthrow" you or something.

But the NA community got weird lately. Lots of quarrels, lots of fighting, be it verbally or with actions. This is no good, not at all. So the offer to receive a totally neutral NA server was like the best thing that could happen. And I gladly accepted.

People claimed that we, the devs, didn't care for NA enough, and I think it was true. That's why we are looking forward to expanding our staff with NA admins and NA betatesters and whatnot.

Bottom line: it's better if strategus is run officially, than by a clan. Any clan.

I have said constantly that the NA Strategus server ban list will be reset when strat comes out. I also have tons of admins from various guilds beyond mine. My servers are run by me, with the whole NA community.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Varric on July 14, 2011, 06:12:31 pm
The servers and their entirety will be run and moderated by chadz and his team of moderators, these servers are completely neutral, and I have no control over them whatsoever. Remember: they are run by chadz, not me.
Someone missed this line.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Wookimonsta on July 14, 2011, 06:17:44 pm
since most of the problems people have with this (including me) is the owner.
Why not have the thing hosted on eckos machine, but with admins and stuff set up by devs.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Erathsmus on July 14, 2011, 06:18:04 pm
Wasn't Zealot banned for badmining?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheesecake on July 14, 2011, 06:18:24 pm
Ecko: I have no problem with you whatsoever, in fact you recently unbanned me.

However the problem is some of your admins.  Ones that ban without warning or just because they dont like someone and/or are drunk and get away with it because they donate alot of cash to keep servers up.


Clean house my friend.  It probably wouldnt have come to this.

This is just my personal opinion and I would also like to state that I appreciate everything you have done for this mod.

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 06:23:07 pm
I have said constantly that the NA Strategus server ban list will be reset when strat comes out. I also have tons of admins from various guilds beyond mine. My servers are run by me, with the whole NA community.
I know I'm one of your admins Ecko, and this could be seen as not being grateful to you for giving me admin. But I really don't see an issue with having an actual OFFICIAL NA server. It's paid for by Zealot and ran completely by the dev team and who they choose. So what you have here is an unbiased group controlling a server in NA for once. I'm glad to see it. +1 for Zealot and +1 for the dev team imo.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: wylker on July 14, 2011, 06:24:35 pm
Ecko we've talked plenty of times and I think you're a good guy and are genuinely trying to grow the community. I also think that you have a sense of entitlement and grandeur that takes away from the good things you do. You should celebrate this server because it helps grow the community, helps get the devs involved with NA, and will help with costs of running servers overall for the community (which you should appreciate more than anyone).

Your opposition and the childish poll you posted reek of some personal crusade against an individual as well as make you look as if you don't want anyone to have any populated servers but yourself. It's not Ecko vs. the world here friend.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 14, 2011, 06:26:24 pm
:1

I think it could go both ways.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 06:26:52 pm
since most of the problems people have with this (including me) is the owner.
Why not have the thing hosted on eckos machine, but with admins and stuff set up by devs.

Yes please.

What do we need 3 more NA servers for anyway? (Strat, Battle and Siege?) chadz, Ecko, can't we just make the ATS servers official instead? Most people already play there. Maybe make the Siege server into an unofficial ATS whatever (battle, siege or DTV, it can rotate) and the Battle and Strat become official?

chadz, my main worry if Zealot pays for the server is that he will then have access to the box. Not the admin password, but the actual server. I feel like he could have a field day messing with stuff in there. Some examples off the top of my head:

- Big LLJK Strat battle coming up. Its key that they win or they lose a city. An hour before the battle, Zealot calls the server host and has them disconnect it. Voila, LLJK doesn't lose its castle.
- Someone Zealot or a goon friend doesn't like is having a big battle... same thing
- Someone Zealot doesn't like gets mysteriously added to the ban list (editing server files.)
- The official servers are all renamed "C-RPG_Ecko_Is_Gay"

Honestly I'm not sure I trust him. Awesome if he wants to pay for the server, but unless he's sending you money via paypal and you or another dev is handling setting up everything and paying for the servers, I can't feel comfortable with this.
 
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Digglez on July 14, 2011, 06:27:41 pm
is this the part like in Empire Strikes Back when Lando lets the Imperials into Cloud City?

LUKE, ITS A TRAP! IT'S A TRAP!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Smoothrich on July 14, 2011, 06:31:17 pm
Yes please.

What do we need 3 more NA servers for anyway? (Strat, Battle and Siege?) chadz, Ecko, can't we just make the ATS servers official instead? Most people already play there. Maybe make the Siege server into an unofficial ATS whatever (battle, siege or DTV, it can rotate) and the Battle and Strat become official?

chadz, my main worry if Zealot pays for the server is that he will then have access to the box. Not the admin password, but the actual server. I feel like he could have a field day messing with stuff in there. Some examples off the top of my head:

- Big LLJK Strat battle coming up. Its key that they win or they lose a city. An hour before the battle, Zealot calls the server host and has them disconnect it. Voila, LLJK doesn't lose its castle.
- Someone Zealot or a goon friend doesn't like is having a big battle... same thing
- Someone Zealot doesn't like gets mysteriously added to the ban list (editing server files.)
- The official servers are all renamed "C-RPG_Ecko_Is_Gay"

Thing is,  ATS restarted the Strategus server while losing a siege, ATS mass  bans innocent clan members because they don't like one or two people, countless unwarranted permbans have been handed out to random pubbies and clan players alike because an admin doesn't like them.  You just described all the problems people have with any clan owning a server, and since ATS owns the most servers they've most visibly harmed the community with actions like this.  That's why these servers wont be ATS, LLJK, Hospitaller, anything like that where internet drama, pride, and personal goals would interfere with creating the best community possible for all players.  What matters is that these are neutral and official.  Zealot has stepped up to pay for them, that's all, don't be paranoid.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 06:32:43 pm
indeed, it was an accident when strategus was fairly new.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 06:33:10 pm
Zealot wont be in charge of the server. chadz wanted to run the official NA servers himself, and Zealot is generously providing and paying for the box himself and giving it entirely to chadz to control, to run as he sees fit. Neutrally with admins he selects. I see no problem with that other then that you are throwing a tantrum. This is chadz show and his decision.

This is a childish thread so I'll joke quote myself here so we can all move on. Zealot is giving chadz the servers so that we can all have non clan owned official servers run entirely by chadz. Ecko I know you're upset right now, but starting a riot and riling people up with things that aren't true isn't going to do anything constructive. This is a great thing for the community, and chadz's decision.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 06:34:32 pm
since most of the problems people have with this (including me) is the owner.
Why not have the thing hosted on eckos machine, but with admins and stuff set up by devs.
Because NA needs another Box. Another server box will cut down on the lag greatly. Expect to start seeing a huge influx of players now that strategus is live. The ATS servers already have lag issues.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Kafein on July 14, 2011, 06:36:49 pm
I think this vote doesn't mean anything. EU can vote and they likely don't even know who zealot or ecko is. Just to prove my point I voted randomly :P
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Dasty on July 14, 2011, 06:37:52 pm
I see two issues with creating new servers even if they are run by the devs.

1. You just made MORE servers for NA. We already have like 8 or 9 servers and most of them are usually empty anyways. Adding more will further split up the population that we have.

2. I know this has been said many times but by having Zealot pay for the server he has complete access to it. Even if you say "Oh no its run by the devs its safe." He easily will have access to it and there are numerous damaging actions that he could do to you while you are playing on the server.

Those are the big issues I have with the creation of more servers specifically owned by Zealot.

I can see the argument of wanting to have the Strat server on its own box, seeing how large battles will inevitably make the entire machine lag. But I don't see why we would need more Battle and Siege servers when we already have so many.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 06:38:47 pm
Thing is,  ATS restarted the Strategus server while losing a siege, ATS mass  bans innocent clan members because they don't like one or two people, countless unwarranted permbans have been handed out to random pubbies and clan players alike because an admin doesn't like them.  You just described all the problems people have with any clan owning a server, and since ATS owns the most servers they've most visibly harmed the community with actions like this.  That's why these servers wont be ATS, LLJK, Hospitaller, anything like that where internet drama, pride, and personal goals would interfere with creating the best community possible for all players.  What matters is that these are neutral and official.  Zealot has stepped up to pay for them, that's all, don't be paranoid.

If you say so. When shit goes down, though, I won't stop myself from saying I told you so :P

Interesting to know about an ATS Strat server restart. I don't think I was there for that, but I find it hard to believe. Then again, maybe I'm biased, maybe it was an accident, or maybe some jackass that's not in the clan anymore did it. I know for a fact no one that runs ATS now would ever do that on purpose. [EDIT: Just saw Ecko's post. So it was an accident.]

As for mass bans, sometimes you have to be a little forceful to get people to follow the rules. All of LLJK wasn't permabanned, they were all temp banned until whoever messed with the servers stepped up. I forget who that was... oh yeah! It was Mr. Charitable-I-Want-To-Buy a-Server-Now!

Like I said, I'm cool if he wants to give chadz money for other official servers. But if Zealot's got any access at all... come on now. That shit happened less than a month ago, no one's gonna reform that fast. Let him prove himself first.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damug on July 14, 2011, 06:40:59 pm
- Big ATS battle going on. Its key that they win or they lose a city. During the battle its clear that ATS is losing and mysteriously the server restarts.
Ecko already did that once
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 06:41:45 pm
So official EU folks want to set up shop in NA finally?

So to play Devil's Advocate, we want them to now run important servers on our side of the pond...

EU

Why is EU having such a massive change of heart? What brought this on?

If we hand over our important Strategus server to the "Official" people, will we get the same amount of attention that was given to us for the past year or so, or will we get support?

We all know how EU operates their official servers, and they do a fine job of it, but when it comes to their attention to NA it has always been ... exceedingly lackluster. So, which side of the coin will it be if we get these new servers? EU attention like they treat EU, or EU attention like they always treat NA?

For all it's imperfections, we already know how Ecko runs his servers. We also know how EU has helped NA in the past for the entire history of c-RPG.

Abstaining from the vote until I can figure out how serious the Official EU is about taking over, or if this is a half-assed project that only involves Shik running things all by himself without help (not counting his "deputies" that he will be electing). On the other hand we could really use some new top-notch servers, and impartial is always a good thing. However, I am afraid that this new "impartial" server will be the usual "I don't care" kind of impartial that EU is famous for towards NA, and not the proper "impartial" attentiveness that EU gives itself.

EDIT: If I donate, will that money start going towards this "Official" NA server or will we have to specifically foot the bill via "unofficial" donations? Further more if I donate towards this "Official" server will it give NA folks the chance to still earn "heirloom loterry" tickets?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 06:42:13 pm
^^^^^^
One thing you didn't think of, if there is Official NA servers, NA players can participate in betas, item balancing, and instant bug fixing.



If there's one external person that I'd first and foremost let the NA server run, it's Ecko. This is in no way an attempt to "overthrow" you or something.

But the NA community got weird lately. Lots of quarrels, lots of fighting, be it verbally or with actions. This is no good, not at all. So the offer to receive a totally neutral NA server was like the best thing that could happen. And I gladly accepted.

People claimed that we, the devs, didn't care for NA enough, and I think it was true. That's why we are looking forward to expanding our staff with NA admins and NA betatesters and whatnot.

Bottom line: it's better if strategus is run officially, than by a clan. Any clan.

This is the best idea since the creation of strategus.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 14, 2011, 06:44:20 pm
I think what most people are worried about is the reputation of the folks who would own the server. They are a clan known for griefing/exploiting, and just generally being racist assholes who seem to partake their main joy in any game they play from ruining the experience of others. I understand that this is a broad statement, and doesn't necessarily describe ALL LLJK members, but the rotten apple spoils the bunch, the company you keep, etc...

Let me put it this way, if LLJK acts like this now,out of spite and malice, what makes you think they won't do it on a grander scale? That's the entire purpose of their clan, to troll the community, and I have to give it to them, they've been somewhat successful. They have done stupid shit multiple times, & you would be a fool to think they won't do it again.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 06:44:47 pm
Now common people, way to get carried away. Why would Zealot pay a crap ton of money out of his own pocket, and give up all influence to chadz, only to do something like that and have it all taken down? It's not like chadz would allow that sort of thing to happen, and if it did, he certainly wouldn't allow it to continue.

Then what is he going to do, steal his own money?

Instead of stringing up Zealot, we should be thanking him for his generosity so that we can split the strain of the new players that will be coming back for strat, and also for giving us official servers for NA players, which we have gone without for ages.

I'd like to request that the poll be taken down and it does not reflect the truth and is only serving to spread discourse and misinformation on a subject that is actually simple and clear.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheesecake on July 14, 2011, 06:46:26 pm
I know this has been said many times but by having Zealot pay for the server he has complete access to it. Even if you say "Oh no its run by the devs its safe." He easily will have access to it and there are numerous damaging actions that he could do to you while you are playing on the server.


this is the problem with the ats servers. I wasnt around for this so called reset but have heard many accounts about it from various clans/people, and you must agree it sounds fishy as hell.

People also say lljk are bad will cheat etc etc.  Ats servers have more than a few BADMINS.  why can't lljk get a chance to do it too. Its fun to troll and cause chaos on others servers but give them a chance.  you also cannot condemn a whole clan  for the actions of a few. were that the case i would hate all ats members
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 06:53:35 pm
So official EU folks want to set up shop in NA finally?

So to play Devil's Advocate, we want them to now run important servers on our side of the pond...

EU
  • Does not use NA for Beta Testers.
  • Has stated openly on numerous occasions that it does not and will not use NA for consideration on item balancing, only what EU does (So thank EU for fucking up your shit folks for the latest patch, as well as fixing what was broken and needed fixing, as it is all them and not us at all.).
  • When the glitch was found that Skills above tne did not work, EU servers received the fix but NA servers had to "wait" for the next patch.
  • Has ignored NA on everything but hooking up and disconnecting new servers.
  • When the slot patch was implemented, mass banned 250 NA players right off the bat for "exploitation" on an impulse "fix" due to a few glitches found on a new game mode.
  • Only in the last few days started helping NA such as hooking up Ecko's servers with the new Admin gadgets or offering to set up a new "officially run" server...

Why is EU having such a massive change of heart? What brought this on?

If we hand over our important Strategus server to the "Official" people, will we get the same amount of attention that was given to us for the past year or so, or will we get support?

We all know how EU operates their official servers, and they do a fine job of it, but when it comes to their attention to NA it has always been ... exceedingly lackluster. So, which side of the coin will it be if we get these new servers? EU attention like they treat EU, or EU attention like they always treat NA?

For all it's imperfections, we already know how Ecko runs his servers. We also know how EU has helped NA in the past for the entire history of c-RPG.

Abstaining from the vote until I can figure out how serious the Official EU is about taking over, or if this is a half-assed project that only involves Shik running things all by himself without help (not counting his "deputies" that he will be electing). On the other hand we could really use some new top-notch servers, and impartial is always a good thing. However, I am afraid that this new "impartial" server will be the usual "I don't care" kind of impartial that EU is famous for towards NA, and not the proper "impartial" attentiveness that EU gives itself.

EDIT: If I donate, will that money start going towards this "Official" NA server or will we have to specifically foot the bill via "unofficial" donations? Further more if I donate towards this "Official" server will it give NA folks the chance to still earn "heirloom loterry" tickets?
Some good points, but I'm not sure they all apply here. Sure it seems like NA has been treated poorly in the past. But what does that have to do with how they run a server in NA? What are they going to just ban everyone for even the slightest infractions? Doubtful. I don't really see how having a neutral official server would be affected by how chadz treats NA.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Strider on July 14, 2011, 06:54:54 pm
lol that log was funny. LLJK_Zealot: LISTEN TO ME, I AM GOD!
this looks so bad that it must be fake, but realistically its not.
That's horrible admin abuse. 
Ecko doesn't abuse his power like that and is the best option for the job so far. Although Ecko and ATS have put in many shitty maps they created into the servers. Which most people do not like.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 14, 2011, 06:55:19 pm
Now common people, way to get carried away. Why would Zealot pay a crap ton of money out of his own pocket, and give up all influence to chadz, only to do something like that and have it all taken down? It's not like chadz would allow that sort of thing to happen, and if it did, he certainly wouldn't allow it to continue.

Then what is he going to do, steal his own money?

Instead of stringing up Zealot, we should be thanking him for his generosity so that we can split the strain of the new players that will be coming back for strat, and also for giving us official servers for NA players, which we have gone without for ages.

I'd like to request that the poll be taken down and it does not reflect the truth and is only serving to spread discourse and misinformation on a subject that is actually simple and clear.

Dude, have you ever played with LLJK? You sound like you're from a different world. I'm not even talking about this game exclusively; their clan is from somethingawful.com, the biggest bridge to ever spawn masses of trolls on the internet. THAT IS THE POINT OF THEIR CLAN.

You come off as extremely naive. I appreciate your sentement, but letting LLJK be involved in any part of this is like letting a cokehead run a daycare. I don't care what anyone says, money talks, bullshit walks. If you're in charge of the finances of a server, or anything in the real world for that matter, you are effectively in charge of that server. This is how the real world works, and the sooner we wise up to it the better off the community will be.

Now, let's get to the part where we suggest a reasonable solution. Why not allow all of those who would like to contribute to a new server do so. Hell, Zealot can even put forward the first year's worth if he's so magnanimous. However, this would go to chadz, he would purchase the server, and run it himself with those he deems fit to help. This way everyone can contribute, the burden of cost is split among many so there is not one controlling interest, and everyone benefits from a truly neutral server/s. Please tell me why this is not the best solution.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ylca on July 14, 2011, 06:56:06 pm
If the result of this poll were 100%/ 0% would there honestly be any change whatsoever? If not i'd ask admins to lock this thread right now as it's really just wasting time. If so then please make it be publicly known.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Dasty on July 14, 2011, 06:56:20 pm
this is the problem with the ats servers. I wasnt around for this so called reset but have heard many accounts about it from various clans/people, and you must agree it sounds fishy as hell.

People also say lljk are bad will cheat etc etc.  Ats servers have more than a few BADMINS.  why can't lljk get a chance to do it too. Its fun to troll and cause chaos on others servers but give them a chance.  you also cannot condemn a whole clan  for the actions of a few. were that the case i would hate all ats members

First, I wasn't in ATS when the so called reset happened but it doesn't sound fishy at all. Back then the server wasn't upgraded as it is today and could have easily crapped out during a large battle back when NA had many players.

Second, I do not think everyone in lljk are bad and will cheat. All I am saying is that Zealot, alone and no ties to lljk, is a bad choice for buying a new server. I disagree with any new server for NA as we already have enough but if someone were to be paying for it I think they would be obligated to have some control over it and I would not want to see Zealot doing this.

Hell, it might be a good idea to have some of the more responsible lljk members to have some admin privileges. I don't exactly how the new admin system works but it seems like you can limit their actions. So having them first start out with a few actions such as kicks and mutes and admin chat might be a good idea.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 14, 2011, 06:56:38 pm
I honestly think we've all grown up as a community, including the ATS people. They used to be really bad with admin abusing, but I know now they will not do that anymore.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Smoothrich on July 14, 2011, 06:57:07 pm
Besides, ATS servers won't be going anywhere that I see, besides Strategus.  Devs just want to host their own official ones and do their own thing.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:00:18 pm
Now common people, way to get carried away. Why would Zealot pay a crap ton of money out of his own pocket, and give up all influence to chadz, only to do something like that and have it all taken down? It's not like chadz would allow that sort of thing to happen, and if it did, he certainly wouldn't allow it to continue.

Then what is he going to do, steal his own money?

Instead of stringing up Zealot, we should be thanking him for his generosity so that we can split the strain of the new players that will be coming back for strat, and also for giving us official servers for NA players, which we have gone without for ages.

I'd like to request that the poll be taken down and it does not reflect the truth and is only serving to spread discourse and misinformation on a subject that is actually simple and clear.

It'll only take about a month or so to get situated, and the troll stunt can commence. We all know LLJK has a surplus of cash anyway (with their $10 entry fee the goons have to be rolling in dough) so what's a couple hundred bucks for an epic stunt that trolls the community of an entire game?

(Don't listen to me, I'm being cynical today)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 07:01:30 pm
Dude, have you ever played with LLJK? You sound like you're from a different world. I'm not even talking about this game exclusively; their clan is from somethingawful.com, the biggest bridge to ever spawn masses of trolls on the internet. THAT IS THE POINT OF THEIR CLAN.

You come off as extremely naive. I appreciate your sentement, but letting LLJK be involved in any part of this is like letting a cokehead run a daycare. I don't care what anyone says, money talks, bullshit walks. If you're in charge of the finances of a server, or anything in the real world for that matter, you are effectively in charge of that server. This is how the real world works, and the sooner we wise up to it the better off the community will be.

Now, let's get to the part where we suggest a reasonable solution. Why not allow all of those who would like to contribute to a new server do so. Hell, Zealot can even put forward the first year's worth if he's so magnanimous. However, this would go to chadz, he would purchase the server, and run it himself with those he deems fit to help. This way everyone can contribute, the burden of cost is split among many so there is not one controlling interest, and everyone benefits from a truly neutral server/s. Please tell me why this is not the best solution.
And if Zealot started making demands, the devs would be forced to meet them... why? He's the one doing them a favor, the dev team doesn't lose anything if the server shuts down.

Your solution isn't bad, but we could have already done this in the past and it wasn't done, so... what's new?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 07:03:43 pm
Dude, have you ever played with LLJK? You sound like you're from a different world. I'm not even talking about this game exclusively; their clan is from somethingawful.com, the biggest bridge to ever spawn masses of trolls on the internet. THAT IS THE POINT OF THEIR CLAN.

You come off as extremely naive. I appreciate your sentement, but letting LLJK be involved in any part of this is like letting a cokehead run a daycare. I don't care what anyone says, money talks, bullshit walks. If you're in charge of the finances of a server, or anything in the real world for that matter, you are effectively in charge of that server. This is how the real world works, and the sooner we wise up to it the better off the community will be.

Now, let's get to the part where we suggest a reasonable solution. Why not allow all of those who would like to contribute to a new server do so. Hell, Zealot can even put forward the first year's worth if he's so magnanimous. However, this would go to chadz, he would purchase the server, and run it himself with those he deems fit to help. This way everyone can contribute, the burden of cost is split among many so there is not one controlling interest, and everyone benefits from a truly neutral server/s. Please tell me why this is not the best solution.

Did you...did you listen to a word I said? Or anyone? Did you even read chadz's post?

Well. Quoting for the new page then.

If there's one external person that I'd first and foremost let the NA server run, it's Ecko. This is in no way an attempt to "overthrow" you or something.

But the NA community got weird lately. Lots of quarrels, lots of fighting, be it verbally or with actions. This is no good, not at all. So the offer to receive a totally neutral NA server was like the best thing that could happen. And I gladly accepted.

People claimed that we, the devs, didn't care for NA enough, and I think it was true. That's why we are looking forward to expanding our staff with NA admins and NA betatesters and whatnot.

Bottom line: it's better if strategus is run officially, than by a clan. Any clan.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: arab on July 14, 2011, 07:03:57 pm
Let's all keep in mind that ZEALOT IS NOT GOING TO BE ADMINISTRATING THE SERVERS. He is going to be setting them up for chadz.

And to address the hate towards Zealot, please keep in mind that Ecko's server's admin password got leaked because he gave it to anyone who would put his dick in their mouth.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 07:04:55 pm
All zealot did was ban couple people on Ecko servers cuz his password was leaked. Then changed the name to Ecko Is Gay. That is hardly a mastermind hacking and nefarious behavior. Having this new box that is superior to Eckos because it is the latest and bestest one, is a good thing. Having the Devs working with the NA community is a good thing. 
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Dasty on July 14, 2011, 07:05:18 pm
I find it interesting how so many LLJK members have come in here to support Zealot.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 07:07:01 pm
I find it interesting how so many LLJK members have come in here to support Zealot.

We are coming in here to support chadz and the Devs.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 07:07:10 pm
I find it interesting how so many LLJK members have come in here to support Zealot.
Just as interesting as Ecko going server to server using admin chat to ask for support? What's your point here?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: arab on July 14, 2011, 07:07:19 pm
I find it interesting how so many LLJK members have come in here to support Zealot.

I find it interesting how so many Northern Empire members have come in here to support Ecko.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 07:07:37 pm
And to address the hate towards Zealot, please keep in mind that Ecko's server's admin password got leaked because he gave it to anyone who would put his dick in their mouth.

Shall we look at the LLJK server and how some of their admins operate? Did you remove Goat yet from Admin, or no?
I find it interesting how so many Northern Empire members have come in here to support Ecko.
I find it interesting how so many LLJK members have come in here to support Zealot.
I find it interesting how LLJK and ATS members can not for once in their lives shut the fuck up about each other.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Joseph on July 14, 2011, 07:08:11 pm
The question is,

What happens if he stops paying?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 07:09:40 pm
Shall we look at the LLJK server and how some of their admins operate? Did you remove Goat yet from Admin, or no?

Goatee was never an admin to my knowledge, and if he was it was incredibly brief period, and meant nothing more than a horrific joke played on the rest of LLJK. Goatee is the village idiot.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 07:10:01 pm
The question is,

What happens if he stops paying?
What happens when anyone stops paying? How is this an issue, it applies to ALL servers.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 07:10:22 pm
The question is,

What happens if he stops paying?

Ecko's server still run and he hardly, never plays. He stated this several times that he is solely community manager, not a player.

Shall we look at the LLJK server and how some of their admins operate? Did you remove Goat yet from Admin, or no?

Stop picking on our retarded child!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 07:10:27 pm
Hmff remeber two things (im not even NA :3)

This server will NOT be laggy, do you like 180 player laggy seiges and battle?
and anyway, this poll will do shit to nothing, chadz has talked and its final...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:11:27 pm
The question is,

What happens if he stops paying?

Agreed.

And Cheap_Shot, I read your post and ALL your requotes, and it seems you haven't read anyone elses. So I'll paraphrase in all caps for you.

IF ZEALOT PAYS FOR THE SERVER HE HAS ACCESS TO THE SERVER.

HE CAN FUCK WITH IT IF HE WANTS TO, AND NOT EVEN chadz CAN STOP HIM.

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 07:12:20 pm
YOU'RE STILL ATS AND YOU'RE DEFENDING THEM, YOU'RE OPINION MEANS NOTHING.

THIS IS BIASED AT ITS BEST!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Varric on July 14, 2011, 07:12:34 pm
AND NOT EVEN chadz CAN STOP HIM.
:lol:.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:12:46 pm
Ecko's server still run and he hardly, never plays. He stated this several times that he is solely community manager, not a player.

Paying, not playing :D
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damug on July 14, 2011, 07:13:23 pm
Shall we look at the LLJK server and how some of their admins operate? Did you remove Goat yet from Admin, or no?I find it interesting how LLJK and ATS members can not for once in their lives shut the fuck up about each other.
Goatee has never been an admin on the LLJK server.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 07:15:17 pm
IF ZEALOT PAYS FOR THE SERVER HE HAS ACCESS TO THE SERVER.

HE CAN FUCK WITH IT IF HE WANTS TO, AND NOT EVEN chadz CAN STOP HIM.
AND IF HE FUCKS AROUND THE SERVER WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DISCONNECTED, AND ZEALOT WILL BE LEFT HOLDING THE BAG FOR A BUNCH OF USELESS SERVERS.

CAN WE PLEASE STOP YELLING AND ACT LIKE ADULTS?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: roymorrison on July 14, 2011, 07:15:36 pm
CAPS LOCK LOL
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:16:06 pm
YOU'RE STILL ATS AND YOU'RE DEFENDING THEM, YOU'RE OPINION MEANS NOTHING.

THIS IS BIASED AT ITS BEST!

I don't mean to be defending anyone. I'm saying that anyone would be better than a known, proven troll. Hell, let Lady_GaGa set it up; at least he's proven himself responsible in the past.

I just don't want the guy who dicks around constantly and has not only griefed but gone on drunken banning sprees to a server he wasn't supposed to be admin on, to have any sort of control whatsoever over any server. ESPECIALLY not an official one.

Dig?  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Thucydides on July 14, 2011, 07:16:49 pm
LULLLZ i voted yes, SHIT STORMS ARE AWESOME
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 07:18:37 pm
I don't mean to be defending anyone. I'm saying that anyone would be better than a known, proven troll. Hell, let Lady_GaGa set it up; at least he's proven himself responsible in the past.

I just don't want the guy who dicks around constantly and has not only griefed but gone on drunken banning sprees to a server he wasn't supposed to be admin on, to have any sort of control whatsoever over any server. ESPECIALLY not an official one.

Dig?  :mrgreen:

YOU DON'T KNOW ME!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:18:49 pm
AND IF HE FUCKS AROUND THE SERVER WILL BE IMMEDIATELY DISCONNECTED, AND ZEALOT WILL BE LEFT HOLDING THE BAG FOR A BUNCH OF USELESS SERVERS.

CAN WE PLEASE STOP YELLING AND ACT LIKE ADULTS?

Yeah, but what if the first month or so of paying for the server is disposable income for this guy? I don't put anything past him after the admin password fiasco. I don't put anything past Goons in general as far as community-wide griefing is concerned. Who cares if the servers disconnect, if he's already got his trophy forum thread on the goon boards?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: SPQR on July 14, 2011, 07:19:32 pm
There is no downside to pursuing this. If Zealot lives up to his side of the agreement then we will have neutral officall NA servers, which I think everyone can agree is best for everyone. Look at this thread alone if you don't believe that neutrality for strategus is vitally important.

If Zealot doesn't live up to it chadz will just disconnect the server and go back to ATS servers (and/or rollback strategus as he's done before) and Zealot will be out hundreds or thousands or dollars.

That being said I sincerely doubt Zealot is gonna throw down a grand or more just to mess with ban lists or whatever.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: arab on July 14, 2011, 07:19:53 pm
Hell, let Lady_GaGa set it up; at least he's proven himself responsible in the past.
HAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 14, 2011, 07:21:16 pm
LULLLZ i voted yes, SHIT STORMS ARE AWESOME
WHERE THE FUCK IS THE YES VOTE? WHAT AM I MISSING?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: wylker on July 14, 2011, 07:22:53 pm
I find it interesting how LLJK and ATS members can not for once in their lives shut the fuck up about each other.

This is the only good post in this thread. (Except for my posts obviously)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 07:29:35 pm
This thread is the reason chadz wants to run the official servers himself. That poll is the reason Ecko owned official servers would be a bad idea.

How do I vote for chadz run official impartial servers? Where is that option man I can't find it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: vinnytk on July 14, 2011, 07:36:51 pm
i'm glad clan neutral servers didn't kill the NA drama

best part of this game imo
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 07:37:41 pm
i'm glad clan neutral servers didn't kill the NA drama

best part of this game imo

Heh, reading the forums is half of the fun!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK_Fellblade on July 14, 2011, 07:38:39 pm
Bahahahaha.

So dumb it hurts.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 07:40:10 pm
I like the miswording :/

Its not zealot who is going to manage the servers players.
All he is gonna do is station it on his home, he is not gonna do anything with the community...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rikthor on July 14, 2011, 07:41:01 pm
Holy hell is this thread stupid, as are most of the responses.

1. chadz and his dev team will be directly involved with the NA server. chadz and his dev team, have picked admins who are not LLJK or ATS for impartiality. How on earth are you people arguing this a bad thing?

2. Classical owns the server. If Classical messed with the server, raged banned people, slapped your mother, or whatever else you detractor's imagine will happen; do you honestly think chadz and the dev team will sit idly by? My lord, if he did anything to screw with the outcome of battle do you honestly think chadz would not fix it? The server would lose it's status within a hour or two and the result would be rolled back, and half of us would be banned more than likely.

3. Seriously, how can anyone from any clan be against an impartial admin crew and a level playing field with next to know lag for siege battles?

I know that as soon as some of you see LLJK/Goons you go into unbridled fits of rage and sperginess, but this is one of the few times you should actually be happy that one of us is doing something to help the community.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:42:21 pm
I like the miswording :/

Its not zealot who is going to manage the servers players.
All he is gonna do is station it on his home, he is not gonna do anything with the community...

You say that like its a fact. How do you know that? If he pays for the server he's got access to it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: arab on July 14, 2011, 07:44:16 pm
Hey Ecko change the poll to:
Ecko taking control of the Strategus servers
chadz maintaining control of his own servers
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Raxmus on July 14, 2011, 07:45:09 pm
Poll is blatantly misleading. Needs to be changed now.

Run by Shik, chadz, other devs of CRPG
Funded by Zealot

 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Varric on July 14, 2011, 07:45:17 pm
You say that like its a fact. How do you know that? If he pays for the server he's got access to it.
AND chadz WON'T BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT IF HE DOES ANYTHING TO IT.
Am I rite?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damug on July 14, 2011, 07:45:49 pm
You say that like its a fact. How do you know that? If he pays for the server he's got access to it.
Alright, he's got access to it, but if he does anything in bad faith the servers will be almost certainly be unlinked, and us North Americans are stuck back where we are now.

I still fail to see how trying this is a bad thing at all, we're no better or worse off if it doesn't work out, I doubt the North American CRPG Community Overlord Ecko is going to take his servers dowj just because he's not supreme commander of North America anymore.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 07:45:58 pm
AND chadz WON'T BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT IF HE DOES ANYTHING TO IT.
Am I rite?

GTFO EU scum and take your damned Logic with you!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Raxmus on July 14, 2011, 07:46:17 pm
AND chadz WON'T BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT IF HE DOES ANYTHING TO IT.
Am I rite?

It's not like he runs CRPG or anything!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lt_Anders on July 14, 2011, 07:47:05 pm
You say that like its a fact. How do you know that? If he pays for the server he's got access to it.

Disagree.
chadz can set up an account(say paypal) and use the funds transfered to that to pay for the server without Zealot being able to touch the server. In this day and age, one can get around hurdles like that.

Just saying.

Why not give it a try. It'd be REAL cool to have 2 NA strat servers. It'd reduce the load for NA based battles(though the poor EU's would have to do the wait queues.)

Holy hell 5 replys made....
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:48:57 pm
AND chadz WON'T BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT IF HE DOES ANYTHING TO IT.
Am I rite?

Alright. You win, I relent. Still, I'll leave you with this parting thought:
Zealot = known troll
chadz = known troll
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 07:50:05 pm
Disagree.
chadz can set up an account(say paypal) and use the funds transfered to that to pay for the server without Zealot being able to touch the server. In this day and age, one can get around hurdles like that.

Just saying.

Why not give it a try. It'd be REAL cool to have 2 NA strat servers. It'd reduce the load for NA based battles(though the poor EU's would have to do the wait queues.)

Holy hell 5 replys made....

This I'd be alright with, as I said in an earlier post
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Keshian on July 14, 2011, 07:51:20 pm
Alright. You win, I relent. Still, I'll leave you with this parting thought:
Zealot = known troll
chadz = known troll

Maybe chadz and zealot should have a baby..... oh wait where have I heard this before, Something about tears and destiny, hmmm.  Either way that baby would be one crazy fucking troll.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: vinnytk on July 14, 2011, 07:52:10 pm
Alright. You win, I relent. Still, I'll leave you with this parting thought:
Zealot = known troll
chadz = known troll

really makes you think

hmmmm
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 07:53:23 pm
Who cares if the servers disconnect, if he's already got his trophy forum thread on the goon boards?
Do you honestly think a "trophy forum thread" (which doesn't exist, and is against SA rules for the most part) is worth a couple hundred to a couple thousand dollars? Do you actually think our Private Forums threads are just so we can plan the next big grief (spearheaded by our most retarded members)?

For the most part, all we do is argue about how effective arrows should be and call Damug "Badug"
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: cmp on July 14, 2011, 07:53:34 pm
really makes you think

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 07:54:13 pm
Here's what happens if Zealot fucks with the servers he is paying for.

chadz disconnects them, Zealot is left with expensive and useless hardware and out a bunch of money.

This is the ONLY way we are getting completely impartial Official NA servers, which also means NA will start to be considered more in things like patches and game balance, and other services that the EU enjoys but we don't. Does everyone really want to continue this petty and useless rage fest and risk losing that? Clearly, so why? There is no downside to this. At all. And chadz knows this and agrees. Why do you think he agreed to it? It's what he wants people. It's what you should want too if you're smart and aren't just listening to Ecko's CALL TO ARMS redirect links he's passing out like it were the war times.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 07:58:22 pm
Maybe chadz and zealot should have a baby..... oh wait where have I heard this before, Something about tears and destiny, hmmm.  Either way that baby would be one crazy fucking troll.

 :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

I suggest Tears_of_Destiny and chadz make a baby together with all the ability to mod and all the right ideas rolled into one supremely-adorable being.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 07:59:54 pm
This thread is just ridiculous!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1kQ7tYN9Yo
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 07:59:58 pm
I'm all for someone else owning and running an NA strategus server. So long as its not zealot.


I've tried to achieve a neutral policy for the servers. Many different guilds have gotten admin on my server. And if people are concerned about lag, hell i'll open up another box just for strategus and let the devs admin it.

Theres only 1 NA dev though besides airith(who is ats) and i doubt shik, though he could do a good job, can be on at all times.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 08:01:25 pm
I'm all for someone else owning and running an NA strategus server. So long as its not zealot.

GOOD NEWS! Zealot has pre-emptively removed disqualified himself of the responsibilities of running the server. He's just hosting and paying for it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: roymorrison on July 14, 2011, 08:02:18 pm
Zealots evil plan revealed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1kQ7tYN9Yo
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: chadz on July 14, 2011, 08:02:53 pm
Just responding to this, because nearly everything in this is just..wrong, or the reason why it would be good for us to have official servers.

EU
  • Does not use NA for Beta Testers.
    That would change when we could get an official NA server. That's why a NA server would be good.
  • Has stated openly on numerous occasions that it does not and will not use NA for consideration on item balancing, only what EU does (So thank EU for fucking up your shit folks for the latest patch, as well as fixing what was broken and needed fixing, as it is all them and not us at all.).
    because we have no NA beta testers
  • When the glitch was found that Skills above tne did not work, EU servers received the fix but NA servers had to "wait" for the next patch.
    and why is that? because we don't have control of an official NA server
  • Has ignored NA on everything but hooking up and disconnecting new servers.
    like every other server except the official EU server? That's why an NA server would be good.
  • When the slot patch was implemented, mass banned 250 NA players right off the bat for "exploitation" on an impulse "fix" due to a few glitches found on a new game mode.
    Who the hell came up with that rumor. Accounts were frozen so I could investigate what the fuck happened without having newer stuff changing the image. The only other way would have been a 16 hour rollback. And this wasn't because the players are from NA, it was because all players of the happening servers were NA.
  • Only in the last few days started helping NA such as hooking up Ecko's servers with the new Admin gadgets or offering to set up a new "officially run" server...


All in all, I hate all this nationalistic shit. I'm probably the last person that thinks one country, one nation, one continent is better than another one.

Fact is: we treated NA like every other server out there, because we wanted to allow every server owner to do as he pleases, as long as it's within the rules.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 08:04:02 pm
Just responding to this, because nearly everything in this is just..wrong, or the reason why it would be good for us to have official servers.

Please, take my servers and admin them. I only do it cause no one else will.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 08:06:50 pm
Please, take my servers and admin them. I only do it cause no one else will.

You should read about wistons churchills dad, he wanted a higher postion and he threatned to leave his post forever if he did not get it, guess what happened?
The goverment said, allright then of you go...

Yeah, that won't work ;)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 08:07:04 pm
Just responding to this, because nearly everything in this is just..wrong, or the reason why it would be good for us to have official servers.

All in all, I hate all this nationalistic shit. I'm probably the last person that thinks one country, one nation, one continent is better than another one.

Fact is: we treated NA like every other server out there, because we wanted to allow every server owner to do as he pleases, as long as it's within the rules.

I've always supported NA official servers. Find the team to manage it, the admins, and i'll be game. Less hassle for me. But i stand by my comments on zealot. You'd be a fool to work with him.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 08:12:23 pm
Just responding to this, because nearly everything in this is just..wrong, or the reason why it would be good for us to have official servers.

All in all, I hate all this nationalistic shit. I'm probably the last person that thinks one country, one nation, one continent is better than another one.

Fact is: we treated NA like every other server out there, because we wanted to allow every server owner to do as he pleases, as long as it's within the rules.

Thank you for responding. Unfortunately, the "nationalistic shit" is only encouraged on irc and in the in-game chats (thank your player base and life in general). In the famous words of a few Admins "Deal With It" as it will never change. I also think that ever culture or nation (or continent) is not better then one another, part of the rich complicated nature of life.

But to be fair, my post is a result of what a lot of NA players think regardless of whether or not it is true or well-founded. For god's sake look at this:
People claimed that we, the devs, didn't care for NA enough, and I think it was true. That's why we are looking forward to expanding our staff with NA admins and NA betatesters and whatnot.
When people like even you say things like this, of course NA goes up in arms with suspicion.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: legionarei on July 14, 2011, 08:19:45 pm
I've always supported NA official servers. Find the team to manage it, the admins, and i'll be game. Less hassle for me. But i stand by my comments on zealot. You'd be a fool to work with him.

I guess it's foolish to take free stuff from someone who is trying to make the game better just because they have a certain tag ... come on people, all Zealot has to gain from this is an empty wallet if anything fishy happens. You think chadz won't be watching like a hawk? If you don't trust Zealot trust the guy who made crpg.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 08:23:41 pm
When people like even you say things like this, of course NA goes up in arms with suspicion.

You are suspicious that chadz has admitted to something and has committed himself to changing things for the better? I know he likes to troll but common man that's a weird reason to get worked up and suspicious.

As for the nationalistic shit...

Quote from: http://www.nacrpg.net/
Vote or Die 7/14/2011

Currently, chadz has made the decision to no longer let me run the NA strategus servers.

 Please click  HERE  to vote on who you would like to run the new servers.

Not doing knee jerk things like this would be a good start to clearing up all this needless outrage and concern. This whole thread was an impulsive bad idea.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 08:26:59 pm
If you don't trust Zealot trust the guy who made crpg.

Quote from: Delro
Zealot = known troll
chadz = known troll

 :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 08:29:47 pm
Please, take my servers and admin them. I only do it cause no one else will.
Actually in this case, someone is willing to do it. It's chadz.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK_Fellblade on July 14, 2011, 08:31:25 pm
Please, take my servers and admin them. I only do it cause no one else will.

I'll admin them bro, no probs.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: arab on July 14, 2011, 08:34:12 pm
Please, take my servers and admin them. I only do it cause no one else will.

Here is my resume (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d14oNtOUsKY)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 14, 2011, 08:48:56 pm
Do you honestly think a "trophy forum thread" (which doesn't exist, and is against SA rules for the most part) is worth a couple hundred to a couple thousand dollars? Do you actually think our Private Forums threads are just so we can plan the next big grief (spearheaded by our most retarded members)?

For the most part, all we do is argue about how effective arrows should be and call Damug "Badug"

Please, nobody its buying the tired excuses of lljk. The clan's nature is well known. Does Carl Rove write your spin?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 08:50:23 pm
You are suspicious that chadz has admitted to something and has committed himself to changing things for the better? I know he likes to troll but common man that's a weird reason to get worked up and suspicious.

I may have not worded that correctly. My point is not that chadz admitted to making a mistake and that created suspicion. The point that I was trying to make was that a lot of NA players already were suspicious, and that chadz admitting that there was a mistake shows that those suspicions did not come out of nowhere.

To make my personal stance clear, without reflecting on what some other NA players show that I play with or hear about:
I am happy that chadz thinks there was a mistake.
I am happy that chadz is interested in letting NA play in the sandbox to begin with and allowing us to have unofficial servers so we can have real ping.
I am happy that he is interested in setting up NA Official connections and am I looking forward to seeing how this new server works and is managed.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 08:52:08 pm
Do you honestly think a "trophy forum thread" (which doesn't exist, and is against SA rules for the most part) is worth a couple hundred to a couple thousand dollars? Do you actually think our Private Forums threads are just so we can plan the next big grief (spearheaded by our most retarded members)?

For the most part, all we do is argue about how effective arrows should be and call Damug "Badug"

Actually I totally did think that. Thanks for clearing that up :D
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Bulzur on July 14, 2011, 09:09:54 pm
1. The poll choice made me laugh. If you want your poll to have any importance, make it unbiaised.

2. If chadz say something, i don't think it's up to a player to post a topic asking what should be done, when it's already decided by the mod developer.

3. Why not give it a chance ?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:13:04 pm
Please, nobody its buying the tired excuses of lljk. The clan's nature is well known. Does Carl Rove write your spin?
Listen man, I'm not trying to convince you of anything. This is a thing that is happening. Barring Zealot undergoing a massive heart attack that prevents him from typing his Credit Card details into a payment form, he'll have bought server space for the NA Strategus community at his own expense and to chadz thanks.

You're obviously convinced this is some grand Goon conspiracy against you and CRPG, and nothing I say is going to convince you otherwise. All myself and other LLJK have been trying to say that this is not the end of the world. Zealot will not find your IP address and track it back to your house to light dog doo on your front step.He isn't going to steal your first-born child and force you to find his real name to get it back.

He's just a guy trying to get some server space for a game he enjoys, and maybe to improve his bad reputation.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:14:44 pm
1. The poll choice made me laugh. If you want your poll to have any importance, make it unbiaised.

2. If chadz say something, i don't think it's up to a player to post a topic asking what should be done, when it's already decided by the mod developer.

3. Why not give it a chance ?

With this logic 95% of the new topics started on all of this forum would not exist...

Wait... You may be onto something.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:16:18 pm
So if i punch you in the face slantedfloors then the next day ask you for money and your car, you would give it to me?
This is the dumbest fucking idea i ever heared, and if it is not a huge troll then this whole idea is fail
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gildiss on July 14, 2011, 09:17:21 pm
chadz judges you on your performance, your trolling has been sub par, Zealot is clearly the better choice.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:18:22 pm
So if i punch you in the face slantedfloors then the next day ask you for money and your car, you would give it to me?
This is the dumbest fucking idea i ever heared, and if it is not a huge troll then this whole idea is fail

Weak analogy.
Zealot is paying and offering the car after punching the guy.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:19:11 pm
So if i punch you in the face slantedfloors then the next day ask you for money and your car, you would give it to me?
This is the dumbest fucking idea i ever heared, and if it is not a huge troll then this whole idea is fail
I'm not even sure what you are trying to compare your example to. It's completely unrecognizable as a parallel scenario to current events.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 09:21:16 pm
Weak analogy.
Zealot is paying and offering the car after punching the guy.

Yeah, but once you drive off with it he's gonna blow that fucker up
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Baggy on July 14, 2011, 09:22:04 pm
I love reading NA drama!  :twisted:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: arab on July 14, 2011, 09:22:53 pm
Yeah, but once you drive off with it he's gonna blow that fucker up

I too destroy things that I spend hundreds of dollars on, it's just so funny when you lose a large investment  :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Secret Agent Cow on July 14, 2011, 09:24:07 pm
I honestly wouldn't give you my car and money regardless of whether you punched me in my face or not.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:24:11 pm
Yeah, but once you drive off with it he's gonna blow that fucker up

Lucky for us he is merely paying for it, and the car is never even touched by him, and we have a third party to "inspect" the car for bombs. The worst he can do is stop paying for it and have it repossessed thus making you go back to "old reliable Betsy."
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 09:27:00 pm
I too destroy things that I spend hundreds of dollars on, it's just so funny when you lose a large investment  :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

You don't think the mob would spend hundreds of dollars to blow someone up?

You don't think a goon would spend one to two hundred dollars to massively grief all of NA?

I am out of ideas for how he would do so, however (I'm not a creative goon,) so I'm just gonna trust chadz (O_O) to keep an eye on it. However, when Zealot somehow figures out how to trace everyone's IP and uses their computers as a massive CPU farm to spam terroristic emails to Barack Obama, landing us all in federal-pound-you-in-the-ass prison, I'm going to bend you over first.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:27:49 pm
I'm not even sure what you are trying to compare your example to. It's completely unrecognizable as a parallel scenario to current events.
ok look rtard, he will pay(i bet with the goons backing) and he will have the power to fuck with all the na team
so i punch you in the face
the next day i offer to pay for gas(the strat box) if u let me use the car, then you give it to me
anyway u  spin this, this is fail
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: nuffen on July 14, 2011, 09:28:24 pm
*gets the popcorn*
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Thucydides on July 14, 2011, 09:28:39 pm
LULZ
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:28:57 pm
ok look rtard, he will pay(i bet with the goons backing) and he will have the power to fuck with all the na team
so i punch you in the face
the next day i offer to pay for gas(the strat box) if u let me use the car, then you give it to me
anyway u trie to spin this, this is fail
No, this is still not a good comparison. Try again. I believe in you.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:30:19 pm
No, this is still not a good comparison. Try again.
I'm sorry you can only think at a 3rd grade lvl, go back to school and try again.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:30:46 pm
ok look rtard, he will pay(i bet with the goons backing) and he will have the power to fuck with all the na team
so i punch you in the face
the next day i offer to pay for gas(the strat box) if u let me use the car, then you give it to me
anyway u  spin this, this is fail

He is not using the car, he is not even doing anything to the car but being a passenger every now and then. He does not drive it, he does not have the key, he does not even have the ability to "pop the hood" and do anything to the car.

I am starting to understand why Classical punched you in the face to begin with... Or maybe he hit too hard... is that the problem?

He can do nothing but either A pay for it or B Stop paying for it. That is it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gildiss on July 14, 2011, 09:31:11 pm
ok look rtard, he will pay(i bet with the goons backing) and he will have the power to fuck with all the na team
so i punch you in the face
the next day i offer to pay for gas(the strat box) if u let me use the car, then you give it to me
anyway u  spin this, this is fail

Ok so there is a car dealer and he is a scorpion and you are a frog and he asks you,
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:31:44 pm
ugh kid, think if your in the car at all you will hear/ get shit. you can fuck over the driver, you can find out shit and mess with the radio....
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:32:16 pm
I am starting to understand why Classical punched you in the face to begin with... Or maybe he hit too hard... is that the problem?
I don't know, either. Why is there even a car in this scenario? What is the point of the "car" when the "money" is also on the line?

Am I the car? Is that what's going on?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:33:15 pm
ugh kid, think if your in the car at all you will hear/ get shit. you can fuck over the driver, you can find out shit and mess with the radio....

He will have the same abilities as any other player. He will not have access to the server box nor the server itself, he is merely having access to "Where chadz says to pay."

Do you get it yet? Or do we want to continue your fascination with Classical going Mad Max and blowing up cars?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Secret Agent Cow on July 14, 2011, 09:33:42 pm
ok look rtard, he will pay(i bet with the goons backing) and he will have the power to fuck with all the na team
so i punch you in the face
the next day i offer to pay for gas(the strat box) if u let me use the car, then you give it to me
anyway u  spin this, this is fail

I am quoting this in-case he decides to make it slightly more coherent.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:33:48 pm
Why is there even a car in this scenario? What is the point of the "car" when the "money" is also on the line?

Am I the car? Is that what's going on?
again go back to school, or dont... we always need people like you for the jobs most of the world dont want to do
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 14, 2011, 09:35:04 pm
this is the problem with the ats servers. I wasnt around for this so called reset but have heard many accounts about it from various clans/people, and you must agree it sounds fishy as hell.

People also say lljk are bad will cheat etc etc.  Ats servers have more than a few BADMINS.  why can't lljk get a chance to do it too. Its fun to troll and cause chaos on others servers but give them a chance.  you also cannot condemn a whole clan  for the actions of a few. were that the case i would hate all ats members
Let me set the record straight about the "reset" by the nefarious ATS clan...


(btw I was not in ATS at the time, was in nK)

We were sieging a castle.  We were winning in tickets by far.  It wasn't even close.  It was an AI castle, not a player-owned castle.  We were having a good time fighting the battle, maybe 45 mins to an hour into it.  All of a sudden, the server goes down.  We all are mad, rage, etc because we just wasted an hour of gameplay towards capturing the castle.  Ecko finds out that Gorath had just gotten home and reset all the servers to update them, including strategus.  It was pure accident and we were all a bit pissed off.

There was no server reset abuse, as these stupid trolls will tell you.  We had admins from at least 4 clans on at that time.  Nothing improper happened.  I can't help that the NA community is full of trolls, idiots, douchebags, and sore losers who somehow thought they were winning the battle with thousands less tickets (for an AI castle, mind you) and far inferior equipment.  Now this pestilent rumor has been going around by LLJK, who live on this sort of stupid e-drama, that ATS abused that map and would have somehow lost if we hadn't reset the server.

I challenge ANYONE who was in the battle to contradict me.  NOTHING improper happened.  If you are going to make accusations, bring some reliable players forward, or offer up video/screenshots.  Otherwise, sit down and stop spreading rumors. 
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:35:23 pm
again go back to school, or dont... we always need people like you for the jobs most of the world dont want to do
Is this still part of the analogy? Am I a car going to school?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Secret Agent Cow on July 14, 2011, 09:36:54 pm
I want to be the school.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:37:00 pm
your mothers a bus,
and your a car
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:37:57 pm
I want to be the school.
Maybe the school is God.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 09:38:34 pm
This is good. This is not a bad thing.

Good thing.

Not a bad thing.

This means we get all the benefits EU get like beta testing and sooner patches, and NA imput into official stats. We get to have official servers that run amazingly, and are free of clan bias. It's unconfirmed, but there might even be cool possibilities for strategus like multiple battles at the same time if things go well. This means we get fair mods hand picked by chadz instead of a bunch of guys someone knows IRL. This also means more servers to share the lag and take the strain of strategus. And Zealot and maybe other generous LLJK are emptying their wallets so you can have all that. Why in gods name don't you want it, other then "Ecko says it's bad" ?

Ecko isn't being stripped of a position. He is not being asked to step down and grand emperor of strategus. chadz wanted to run the official servers himself, and agrees that it is the smart thing to do. Ecko is very upset that the duty is not being granted to him and is throwing a tantrum. I'd rather have chadz own every server then have an official one run and handled by a person who stirs up this much drama when he doesn't get what he wants. Strategus is going to be 100% improved by this and there is really no way to argue that it wont.

edit: also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hp2Um5nF8nA
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 09:38:46 pm
your mothers a bus,
and your a car

I'ma bussin' your momma
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: PhantomZero on July 14, 2011, 09:40:07 pm
I challenge ANYONE who was in the battle to contradict me.  NOTHING improper happened.  If you are going to make accusations, bring some reliable players forward, or offer up video/screenshots.  Otherwise, sit down and stop spreading rumors.

Yes you were winning the siege, it may not have been "close" but considering you had already started with a significant advantage in troops and equipment, I'd say we were doing pretty good. But when the servers came back up, half the defenders did not return to the battle. You took significantly less losses in both equipment and troops the second time around, in addition to being able to perfect your strategy.

The ideal thing to have done would have just moved the battle to the next day, to allow the defenders to rejoin the battle, since they were not on teamspeak and did not know to rejoin the battle.

The most important issue, is that the defenders were not notified to rejoin the battle, and instead of the original 60 players fighting against you, there were maybe 30, if that. That is why this is such a big issue, not that we were "winning" or anything like that.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 09:40:44 pm
He will have the same abilities as any other player. He will not have access to the server box nor the server itself, he is merely having access to "Where chadz says to pay."

Do you get it yet? Or do we want to continue your fascination with Classical going Mad Max and blowing up cars?

sorry, who owns the server? you say he wont have access? that's poor business right there. WHY CANT HE JUST DONATE TO chadz AND HAVE chadz RENT A SERVER
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Secret Agent Cow on July 14, 2011, 09:41:53 pm
sorry, who owns the server? you say he wont have access? that's poor business right there. WHY CANT HE JUST DONATE TO chadz AND HAVE chadz RENT A SERVER
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH~~~~~~!!!!!!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: chadz on July 14, 2011, 09:43:02 pm
Keep at least the spam down or I'll call the intercontinental moderator group.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:43:38 pm
sorry, who owns the server? you say he wont have access? that's poor business right there. WHY CANT HE JUST DONATE TO chadz AND HAVE chadz RENT A SERVER

I think that is what Zealot is effectively doing.
"hey chadz, if I give you a shitton more money then you normally get, every month, consistently, will you be super cool and use it for this specific purpose?"

And then chadz was all like "Lulz lets do this and troll"

And then we were all like "THE SKY IS FUCKING FALLING but it's ok, I have a fucking lollipop and i'm a car but your mother is a bus and god is school..."
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:44:47 pm
Keep at least the spam down or I'll call the intercontinental moderator group.
Can we continue trying to piece out Native_ATS's analogy though?  This thing will be the Voynich Manual of the 21st century.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:46:51 pm
I think that is what Zealot is effectively doing.
"hey chadz, if I give you a shitton more money then you normally get, every month, consistently, will you be super cool and use it for this specific purpose?"

And then chadz was all like "Lulz lets do this and troll"

And then we were all like "THE SKY IS FUCKING FALLING but it's ok, I have a fucking lollipop and i'm a car but your mother is a bus and god is school..."
You Think? so you dont know? This is way you fail
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK_Goatee on July 14, 2011, 09:48:33 pm
sorry, who owns the server? you say he wont have access? that's poor business right there. WHY CANT HE JUST DONATE TO chadz AND HAVE chadz RENT A SERVER

Ecko as LLJK diplomat I would like to give you a subtle hint in netiquette please keep your font to 14 and lower.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:49:32 pm
You Think? so you dont know? This is way you fail

At least I understand that Zealot is doing "charity" unlike Ecko who is calling it "Business" nor am I babbling about punching people in the face that so far not a single person understands the analogy of why the car is going from person B to A instead of the other way around....

But it's ok... I finally understand your avatar... I thought it was a community warning against trolls not that you were the troll in question.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: downer on July 14, 2011, 09:49:49 pm
This thread is just delightful. <font size=billion>Why can't Zealot just pay for a server that chadz and Shik operate?</font>
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 09:50:04 pm
And then we were all like "THE SKY IS FUCKING FALLING but it's ok, I have a fucking lollipop and i'm a car but your mother is a bus and god is school..."

[/thread]
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Nindur on July 14, 2011, 09:51:38 pm
Seems silly to trust him not to log into his own serverbox. Zealot had to scrounge to sneak the NA server passwords, so what makes you think he would not access a server that he has the password to and has total control of.

Also the poll seems to speak volumes about the way the NA players who mainly use the NA strat server feel. The Vast majority of NA players like the Strat server as it is and feel it is fair.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Native_ATS on July 14, 2011, 09:52:56 pm
At least I understand that Zealot is doing "charity" unlike Ecko who is calling it "Business" nor am I babbling about punching people in the face that so far not a single person understands the analogy of why the car is going from person B to A instead of the other way around....

But it's ok... I finally understand your avatar... I thought it was a community warning against trolls not that you were the troll in question.
You dont understand at all, you just think you do. You just said I think that is what Zealot is effectively doing.
your backing a known troll, and a power abuser with out knowing for sure.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 09:53:28 pm
Also the poll seems to speak volumes about the way the NA players who mainly use the NA strat server feel. The Vast majority of NA players like the Strat server as it is and feel it is fair.
I agree, a biased poll made in the middle of the working day that was locked after it's originator went to every single Teamspeak he could and riled people up with divisive language is clearly indicative of the prevailing attitudes of the NA community.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK_Goatee on July 14, 2011, 09:53:33 pm
ELLAKO in my Hebrew Gematria 69 is the number for reproduction and life so by locking the poll you have guaranteeing us life and locked yourself into the blasphemous number of 0 next to nine TIA.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: wylker on July 14, 2011, 09:54:44 pm
You know, a lot of fan-bois have come to this thread to go up in arms about something or another. There has been some truth, a lot of panic and waved arms, and possibly the worst metaphor I have ever seen on the internet. Oh yeah some hyperbole too. The bottom line is that no one can give a single legitimate reason why this is in any way a bad thing for anyone beyond some veiled mistrust of Zealot.

Honestly this seems more and more like Ecko feels some weird desperate need to have some kind of power over the NA crpg community and has called in his henchmen to blast the thread. I even heard a rumor that someone went server to server on NA and used admin chat to drum up contention to this idea.

I'm sure if there was any valid point raised by any non-rabid member of the forum community then it would be addressed in a grown up fashion but since that has yet to happen in 10 pages maybe everyone should just

CALM DOWN
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 09:55:54 pm
As I said many time before, chadz WON'T CHANGE IT, You won't get anywhere by crying...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 09:57:01 pm
You dont understand at all, you just think you do. You just said I think that is what Zealot is effectively doing.
your backing a known troll, and a power abuser with out knowing for sure.

Official North American Servers
Read below for more information..

So chadz asked me to post here to announce something to you guys, since you brought this thread up yourself.

For the last couple weeks I've been in talks with chadz to organize a set of servers for both, Battle, Siege, and Strategus that are officially endorsed by chadz, and his entire staff of official admins. This was only being discussed due to the fact there were no "official" servers for North America, unlike the European servers, which are official.

So long story short: I'm going to be throwing up a well-specced box (I'm a little too lazy to use multiple ones, deal with it) and paying for it, off this box the official North American servers will be hosted on it. The new official North American servers will be a..

Battle Server, Siege Server, and the official Strategus Server, slots for each of these servers is still being decided.

The servers and their entirety will be run and moderated by chadz and his team of moderators, these servers are completely neutral, and I have no control over them whatsoever. Remember: they are run by chadz, not me.

Consider this my gift to the community.

The servers are estimated to go up sometime next week, we'll see if the payment goes through without complications, but I'm estimating it for sometime next week. Just stick to the fact, this is a reality, and it is coming when it comes, I'll try to be as speedy as possible.

Remember, these are official servers run by chadz and his moderation teams, not run by me.

Someone missed this line.

Native, learn to read ffs. I am "thinking" this because it is True.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 09:57:56 pm
I just want to know why Ecko and Company hates chadz and Shik so much? The server will be run by them, and is better then Eckos box. I suspect all the people in favor of Ecko's server hates Freedom and America.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Anti on July 14, 2011, 09:58:27 pm
Ok...ok..ok...But seriously, Native give us another analogy plz?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 09:59:03 pm
I just want to know why Ecko and Company hates chadz and Shik so much? The server will be run by them, and is better then Eckos box. I suspect all the people in favor of Ecko's server hates Freedom and America.

I am a truck now.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 10:00:30 pm
Zealot had to scrounge to sneak the NA server passwords.

Ecko had very poor security. One of his trusted mods just gave Zealot the password. A literal "here is the keys, take her for a spin and crash her please." So getting back to Natives car analogy...

edit: OH! also, speaking of trusting people with things. Ecko apparently tracks our CD keys and IP's on his website and we have no say over that? Interesting.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 10:01:01 pm
I am a truck now.
No no no, the car is the 1st-person perspective of the analogy's viewer. Other traffic on the road is either the European CRPG community or the disputed zone of Bure between Ethiopia and Eritrea.

The car's manufacturer, I guess, is man's inhumanity to man.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 14, 2011, 10:01:11 pm
Yes you were winning the siege, it may not have been "close" but considering you had already started with a significant advantage in troops and equipment, I'd say we were doing pretty good. But when the servers came back up, half the defenders did not return to the battle. You took significantly less losses in both equipment and troops the second time around, in addition to being able to perfect your strategy.

The ideal thing to have done would have just moved the battle to the next day, to allow the defenders to rejoin the battle, since they were not on teamspeak and did not know to rejoin the battle.

The most important issue, is that the defenders were not notified to rejoin the battle, and instead of the original 60 players fighting against you, there were maybe 30, if that. That is why this is such a big issue, not that we were "winning" or anything like that.
Is this the best defence you can come up with?  Okay, I really shouldn't even be replying to this as the facts are evident, but here goes...

A) Only chadz can change battle times, which he does rarely for any reason.  Usually he effectively says "lulz deal with it."
B) People have brains: if they want to keep playing, they should rejoin on their own.  It is the individual's fault if he doesn't come back, ATS has no blame in that.  I always rejoin battles that crash as a merc.  And I recall a lot more than 30 rejoining, more like 40-50.
C) We had no idea what would happen when the server crashed.  personally I thought the battle would get bugged and ATS would lose everything (soldiers/equip).  Fortunately that didn't happen and it went back to the start of the battle.
D) We did get a better strategy the second time around, simply because we had more experience attacking the castle.  Throughout the battle we were getting more experience and getting better.  The defenders should have done the same.  Not our fault if they didn't take advantage of the opportunity.



Okay, and so it doesn't seem like I am derailing the thread, the point is this: ATS never did abuse the strat server, and does not abuse the siege or battle servers.  ATS let lots of admin in from other clans and clan-less people, including myself who just recently joined the clan.  Abusive admins have been weeded out as best as possible.  LLJK on the other hand has a reputation so large that I need not say any more.  Trolling, greifing, spamming, banning half the server for the lulz, and the like.  The ONLY way you will prevent this is to keep LLJK away from the server box.  If Classical will simply forward the money to chadz and not control the box, I will respect him greatly.  However, I still see no reason to shut down a perfectly good server that we used for months.  Keep both servers up if you are set on getting an official strat server, and fraps the entire battle on the ATS Strategus so you can report abuse.  You won't find any.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 10:01:31 pm
If you want us to take you seriously, first take of the ATS tags, so we know you're not biased and second go to EU so you have no hard feelings to anyone, then we can take you seriously...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 10:06:04 pm
If you want us to take you seriously, first take of the ATS tags, so we know you're not biased and second go to EU so you have no hard feelings to anyone, then we can take you seriously...

i'll never take the tags off, but i will suggest that if you don't trust me you go for anyone but zealot
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 10:10:40 pm
i'll never take the tags off, but i will suggest that if you don't trust me you go for anyone but zealot
It turns out that Wylker will be heavily involved too, so your wish is granted.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK_Goatee on July 14, 2011, 10:11:13 pm
i'll never take the tags off, but i will suggest that if you don't trust me you go for anyone but zealot

Hmm Ekco a troll in his own servers and a troll tf2 hat in his avatar makes u think...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Secret Agent Cow on July 14, 2011, 10:11:31 pm
God damn it goatee
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Mannhammer on July 14, 2011, 10:11:41 pm
Remember NA is a Large area. Living on the West coast of the US my ping runs between 70-90 on the ATS server.

If an official cRPG/Strat server is going up for NA.

Could we please set up the official server in central geography? (for example Texas, North Dakota?) It's good middle ground for the whole NA cRPG community.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 10:12:39 pm
Could we please set up the official server in central geography? (for example Texas, North Dakota?) It's good middle ground for the whole NA cRPG community.
It's currently slated to be located in Chicago.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: serpus on July 14, 2011, 10:12:58 pm
ats admin is why i stop playing this game.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Killerz on July 14, 2011, 10:13:09 pm
Official North American Servers
Read below for more information..

So chadz asked me to post here to announce something to you guys, since you brought this thread up yourself.

For the last couple weeks I've been in talks with chadz to organize a set of servers for both, Battle, Siege, and Strategus that are officially endorsed by chadz, and his entire staff of official admins. This was only being discussed due to the fact there were no "official" servers for North America, unlike the European servers, which are official.

So long story short: I'm going to be throwing up a well-specced box (I'm a little too lazy to use multiple ones, deal with it) and paying for it, off this box the official North American servers will be hosted on it. The new official North American servers will be a..

Battle Server, Siege Server, and the official Strategus Server, slots for each of these servers is still being decided.

The servers and their entirety will be run and moderated by chadz and his team of moderators, these servers are completely neutral, and I have no control over them whatsoever. Remember: they are run by chadz, not me.

Consider this my gift to the community.

The servers are estimated to go up sometime next week, we'll see if the payment goes through without complications, but I'm estimating it for sometime next week. Just stick to the fact, this is a reality, and it is coming when it comes, I'll try to be as speedy as possible.

Remember, these are official servers run by chadz and his moderation teams, not run by me.

Did everyone completely miss this line? If his name is on the order form for the server HE will have control of it. Going on only the information we have, this is what it looks like.

Really this whole shit storm could of been avoided. There is VERY poor communication going on...  Not only was this deal placed without knowledge from the NA community. chadz had someone who a lot of the NA community is wary of announce it.

What should of happened is chadz making a official post about wanting official NA Servers. I guarantee if you would of trusted the community instead of going behind our backs this shit storm would of never happened.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK_Goatee on July 14, 2011, 10:13:25 pm
i stop playing this game.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 10:14:29 pm
A) Only chadz can change battle times, which he does rarely for any reason.  Usually he effectively says "lulz deal with it."
B) People have brains: if they want to keep playing, they should rejoin on their own.  It is the individual's fault if he doesn't come back, ATS has no blame in that.  I always rejoin battles that crash as a merc.  And I recall a lot more than 30 rejoining, more like 40-50.
C) We had no idea what would happen when the server crashed.  personally I thought the battle would get bugged and ATS would lose everything (soldiers/equip).  Fortunately that didn't happen and it went back to the start of the battle.
D) We did get a better strategy the second time around, simply because we had more experience attacking the castle.  Throughout the battle we were getting more experience and getting better.  The defenders should have done the same.  Not our fault if they didn't take advantage of the opportunity.

So they should have rejoined a battle they didn't know they were able to? ...What? You realize that... you know what, no you clearly don't realize. I think a lot of people in this thread are having trouble realizing. The official servers are coming. They will be better. They will be unbiased, They will be totally controlled by chadz, and it doesn't matter if Ecko uses his admin powers to spam in all the servers asking people to come here and vote on his biased misinformed poll. Strategus WILL be awesome and run amazingly no matter how hard you fight it.

Perhaps you just need to get in the car and ride, since the door is open and the driver has his license.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lockt on July 14, 2011, 10:17:09 pm
Perhaps you just need to get in the car and ride, since the door is open and the driver has his license.

But who is controlling the radio and climate control?!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 10:18:07 pm
But who is controlling the radio and climate control?!
I think the radio is the developmental difference between nature and nurture.

Air conditioner is just an air conditioner.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 10:19:25 pm
ats admin is why i stop playing this game.

Add one more idiot to the list for not noticing that there are alternative servers like Blackrose or Texas or Tunatown etc...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gamerofthegame on July 14, 2011, 10:19:42 pm
Can we stop this, now?

You're all being retarded on various levels of it. It's a Strat server, something the Goons have been lazing about waiting for to come back so they can play again. They're not going to sabotage it. Further more, it's going to be better then Ecko's currently intended Strat server on the virtue of hardware and less actual individual servers on one box. (See; As I am aware, Ecko's server hosts all of them on the same box, this Strat will only have it on one.)

There are whispers and observations of ATS (And such) abusing their "power" in regards to the server as admins, some in regards to old Strat. Did these necessarily happen? Maybe. Does it really matter? No, the server is run by ATS - That's a bias. This movement means that the server will be managed by the very makers of the mod and selected people among the community as a whole. Not just, mostly, a clan. How is that worse?

Spoiler;
(click to show/hide)

You all are speaking of Zealot being able to fuck with the server... Well, let's assume he will, for this argument's sake; chadz no doubt removes the official support of the server. Who else has Strat server stuff? Ecko. So Zealot wasted a fair amount of money and now Ecko is hosting the strat server, anyway. Wouldn't that be a good thing, then? The person you loathe for some reason or another gets damaged and in the end "you" still "win"?

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 10:21:41 pm
Can we stop this, now?

You're all being retarded on various levels of it. It's a Strat server, something the Goons have been lazing about waiting for to come back so they can play again. They're not going to sabotage it. Further more, it's going to be better then Ecko's currently intended Strat server on the virtue of hardware and less actual individual servers on one box. (See; As I am aware, Ecko's server hosts all of them on the same box, this Strat will only have it on one.)

There are whispers and observations of ATS (And such) abusing their "power" in regards to the server as admins, some in regards to old Strat. Did these necessarily happen? Maybe. Does it really matter? No, the server is run by ATS - That's a bias. This movement means that the server will be managed by the very makers of the mod and selected people among the community as a whole. Not just, mostly, a clan. How is that worse?

Spoiler;
(click to show/hide)

You all are speaking of Zealot being able to fuck with the server... Well, let's assume he will, for this argument's sake; chadz no doubt removes the official support of the server. Who else has Strat server stuff? Ecko. So Zealot wasted a fair amount of money and now Ecko is hosting the strat server, anyway. Wouldn't that be a good thing, then? The person you loathe for some reason or another gets damaged and in the end "you" still "win"?

Just as I told Varric, you can take your Logic good sir and GTFO.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rhaelys on July 14, 2011, 10:34:59 pm
There should be threads like this everyday.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 10:35:54 pm
There should be threads like this everyday.

Aye, loving ze drama ja!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Bulzur on July 14, 2011, 10:36:55 pm
i'll never take the tags off, but i will suggest that if you don't trust me you go for anyone but zealot

Me, me, go for me !
Ecko just gave me thy blessing ! I'll have Hardnesskiller to second me in this hard task, and i'll find 29 other buddies too, to be sure to be there at all time. Oh god, we're going to have fun work.
Thanks for your blessing Ecko again. Thread can be close now, thanks.

What ? I'm EU ? And ? I'm "anyone".


ToD doesn't like logic. Give him analogies. Cars ftw.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 10:38:43 pm
ToD doesn't like logic. Give him analogies. Cars ftw.

Yay cars! *claps*
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 10:39:11 pm
Me, me, go for me !
Ecko just gave me thy blessing ! I'll have Hardnesskiller to second me in this hard task, and i'll find 29 other buddies too, to be sure to be there at all time. Oh god, we're going to have fun work.
Thanks for your blessing Ecko again. Thread can be close now, thanks.

What ? I'm EU ? And ? I'm "anyone".


ToD doesn't like logic. Give him analogies. Cars ftw.

Ohh I can abooze to ban all the enemy team, because we're allies? oh yay we will win strat...

I give a MW Ferraria enzo for ToD!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: serpus on July 14, 2011, 10:39:49 pm
Add one more idiot to the list for not noticing that there are alternative servers like Blackrose or Texas or Tunatown etc...

those r always emtpy or have less then 20 players.  Not very fun at all.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: robert_namo on July 14, 2011, 10:44:29 pm
Ecko is not a bad leader. It is the admins that have short tempers that ruin it for you Ecko. I only have beef against one of your admins, but there are more like him that I think should not have admin powers. Other than that, the servers have been doing fairly well as is and there seems to be a stalemate with everyone involved in this drama, I think you guys should find a middle ground.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 14, 2011, 10:44:32 pm
Can we stop this, now?

You're all being retarded on various levels of it. It's a Strat server, something the Goons have been lazing about waiting for to come back so they can play again. They're not going to sabotage it. Further more, it's going to be better then Ecko's currently intended Strat server on the virtue of hardware and less actual individual servers on one box. (See; As I am aware, Ecko's server hosts all of them on the same box, this Strat will only have it on one.)

There are whispers and observations of ATS (And such) abusing their "power" in regards to the server as admins, some in regards to old Strat. Did these necessarily happen? Maybe. Does it really matter? No, the server is run by ATS - That's a bias. This movement means that the server will be managed by the very makers of the mod and selected people among the community as a whole. Not just, mostly, a clan. How is that worse?

Spoiler;
(click to show/hide)

You all are speaking of Zealot being able to fuck with the server... Well, let's assume he will, for this argument's sake; chadz no doubt removes the official support of the server. Who else has Strat server stuff? Ecko. So Zealot wasted a fair amount of money and now Ecko is hosting the strat server, anyway. Wouldn't that be a good thing, then? The person you loathe for some reason or another gets damaged and in the end "you" still "win"?

the problem isn't that its run by a clan. If any other clan ran it, I would be fine with that. Chaos, Blackrose, NA based GK, etc. etc. they're all good folks. The problem is with Zealot. He is quite literally the last person I would ever pick to own a strategus server. You claim that ATS is accused of abusing power nearly a year ago, well just a few weeks ago zealot did one of the biggest abuses of the admin control panel in the history of c-rpg, arguably in warband. The issue that this same goon is the one who will own the server and have access to the admin passwords and everything. That is what the uproar is about.

If you cannot see the reason for concern behind that, then you must have been dropped as a child.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 10:53:21 pm
the problem isn't that its run by a clan. If any other clan ran it, I would be fine with that. Chaos, Blackrose, NA based GK, etc. etc. they're all good folks. The problem is with Zealot. He is quite literally the last person I would ever pick to own a strategus server. You claim that ATS is accused of abusing power nearly a year ago, well just a few weeks ago zealot did one of the biggest abuses of the admin control panel in the history of c-rpg, arguably in warband. The issue that this same goon is the one who will own the server and have access to the admin passwords and everything. That is what the uproar is about.

If you cannot see the reason for concern behind that, then you must have been dropped as a child.

Anyone who thinks like this, is delusional manchild that takes their internet horse simulator really too seriously.

Zealot banned couple people on a low population server, in the middle of the night, knowing full well that those players would be unban in a couple hours. He also changed the name of the server to Ecko Is A Gay. Zealot was drunk and was never an official admin on any servers, not even on lljk. It was Ecko's fault by choosing 30+ admins, and retarded ones that would hand out passwords to anyone.

These new Official Servers will be run by Shik, not zealot or any lljk. Zealot is just funding the servers himself, and probably take donations. Why are so many people on this forum incapable of critical thinking?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: MrShine on July 14, 2011, 10:56:00 pm
Ok guys.

I got it.

The server is a bus. 

One day, Zealot got drunk, hijacked the bus, crashed the bus, and pooped on the seats.
Then Zealot got kicked off the bus.  He can't ride the bus.

Now Zealot is buying his own bus and letting everyone ride it for free.
He even hired some drivers and promised never to drive the bus again.

But you have to ask yourself: 
Do I ride this bus?
Why would I want this guy around my bus?
If he's paying for the bus, do I trust that he won't try driving the bus at some point in the future?
What's this dude's thing about buses anyway?

And perhaps most importantly:
If he took a dump on the last bus, how come this one faintly smells like shit?

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: a_bear_irl on July 14, 2011, 10:58:31 pm
this is a Good Thing (tm) and if you disagree, welp, you dumb, son

if you think a drunk zealot fucking around on the server and banning a couple dudes for a couple hour is worse than ecko using his position as server admin/massbans to gain metagame leverage (multiple times), you are so dumb i'm astonished you're even able to read this.

one is a dude having too much to drink and doing something dumb
the other is repeated admin abuse and proof that ecko should be far away from anything official/strat

and to boot ecko's servers already run somewhat poorly and don't really need the extra load from big strat battles anyway
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 14, 2011, 10:59:19 pm
Why did my mother drink when she was pregnant with me?

summed up your post quite well.


Owning the server= bending over for zealot with your pants around your ankles hoping he doesn't feel lonely. If you don't understand that, then just stop typing and do the world a favor and throw your computer out the second story window.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 10:59:46 pm
Ok guys.

I got it.

The server is a bus. 

One day, Zealot got drunk, hijacked the bus, crashed the bus, and took a dump on the seats.
Then Zealot got kicked off the bus.  He can't ride the bus.

Now Zealot is buying his own bus and letting everyone ride it for free.
He even hired some drivers and promised never to drive the bus again.

But you have to ask yourself: 
Do I ride this bus?
Why would I want this guy around my bus?
If he's paying for the bus, do I trust that he won't try driving the bus at some point in the future?
Even though this is a new bus, will it smell like shit?
What's this dude's thing about buses anyway?

(click to show/hide)

Thats almost it. Except the first part. The first bus was owned by Ecko Inc, and one of his drivers gave the keys to Zealot.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 11:01:03 pm
summed up your post quite well.


Owning the server= bending over for zealot with your pants around your ankles hoping he doesn't feel lonely. If you don't understand that, then just stop typing and do the world a favor and throw your computer out the second story window.

Apparently letting Shik run the server is  equivalent of being raped by zealot. You won me over, changing my vote now.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 14, 2011, 11:03:37 pm
Are you as retarded in real life as you play out to be here? <--- I'm seriously asking this by the way, its not rhetorical.


Zealot owning the server= bad idea. If someone comes in and shits all over the place, you don't reward him by giving him one of the most crucial parts of strategus. It does not matter if shik runs the server, if Zealot owns it, there will be trouble. Let someone else run it who does not have a long history of griefing.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: nuffen on July 14, 2011, 11:04:18 pm
One day, Zealot got drunk, hijacked the bus, crashed the bus, and took a dump on the seats.
Then Zealot got kicked off the bus.  He can't ride the bus.

He didnt hijack the bus, he got the keys from one of the drivers (who are thereby responsible for his actions, legally)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 11:04:56 pm
Apparently letting Shik run the server is  equivalent of being raped by zealot. You won me over, changing my vote now.

It's not rape if it is consensual, and it would be consensual if you bent over deliberately. :shock:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 14, 2011, 11:06:00 pm
The simplest way to end the controversy would be what I suggested earlier: Have a paypal account that goes to chadz, and HE pays for the server directly. Why limit financial input to one person, regardless of who they are? I would put up cash to help fund the new server if given a chance, and I'm sure others would too.

I will literally put my money where my mouth is on this one. Set up a fund for chadz, let him purchase and fully control the server. That way nobody controls it directly through finances/physical ownership, and everyone wins.

Nobody has yet refuted why this solution is not rational and neutral. I would just like us all to get along so we can all kill each other in a game.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 14, 2011, 11:07:25 pm
He didnt hijack the bus, he got the keys from one of the drivers (who are thereby responsible for his actions, legally)

Does not matter how he got the password, it was a clear-cut abuse. Both should be permanently banned in my opinion.

Zealot's abuse was malicious and hindered other people's enjoyment of the game. Besides, what guarantee do we have that this won't happen again next time he is drunk... except with strategus?



The simplest way to end the controversy would be what I suggested earlier: Have a paypal account that goes to chadz, and HE pays for the server directly. Why limit financial input to one person, regardless of who they are? I would put up cash to help fund the new server if given a chance, and I'm sure others would too.

I will literally put my money where my mouth is on this one. Set up a fund for chadz, let him purchase and fully control the server. That way nobody controls it directly through finances/physical ownership, and everyone wins.

Nobody has yet refuted why this solution is not rational and neutral. I would just like us all to get along so we can all kill each other in a game.

this is a completely rational and sensible solution
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: a_bear_irl on July 14, 2011, 11:07:37 pm
Are you as retarded in real life as you play out to be here? <--- I'm seriously asking this by the way, its not rhetorical.


Zealot owning the server= bad idea. If someone comes in and shits all over the place, you don't reward him by giving him one of the most crucial parts of strategus. It does not matter if shik runs the server, if Zealot owns it, there will be trouble. Let someone else run it who does not have a long history of griefing.

what is wrong with your brain? do you huff industrial solvents? break brick walls with your forehead? eat glue?

zealot fucked with a server one time for laughs. no permanent damage just a few bruised egos and some drama. that does not make him unsuitable to run a server. a "long history" of griefing? stop posting
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 14, 2011, 11:09:14 pm
He didnt hijack the bus, he got the keys from one of the drivers (who are thereby responsible for his actions, legally)

If I steal your car keys, jump in the car and realize your baby is strapped in the back seat, throw him from the window at high speeds, and then abandon the car on the side of the road, you can be sure as shit I'm going to jail for a long time.

I just wanted to get in on the metaphor.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 11:10:03 pm
Are you as retarded in real life as you play out to be here? <--- I'm seriously asking this by the way, its not rhetorical.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: nuffen on July 14, 2011, 11:12:19 pm
If I steal your car keys, jump in the car and realize your baby is strapped in the back seat, throw him from the window at high speeds, and then abandon the car on the side of the road, you can be sure as shit I'm going to jail for a long time.

I just wanted to get in on the metaphor.

I didnt realised that Zealot killed anyone IRL.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 14, 2011, 11:13:01 pm
I knew you sounded like you were mentally handicapped when you spoke, just gave you the benefit of the doubt until now, Gaga
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 11:14:03 pm
I knew you sounded like you were mentally handicapped when you spoke, just gave you the benefit of the doubt until now, Gaga

I am drunk!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 14, 2011, 11:14:16 pm
Everyone calm down and shut up for a while, unless you're going to further analyze the car analogy. Stop pretending your opinions matter, and read this thread. It is long, it is glorious, and above all it says that there is literally NO DOWNSIDE to this. NONE. Everything will be better in every way with a dedicated new and better box devoted to strat with chadz COMPLETELY in control 100% with NO risk to you at all, instead of having Eckos server box groan as it accepts the sweaty heft of stategus, followed by Ecko saddling up and a grabbing hold of the crop whip. The only one who stands to lose anything if this doesn't work out is Zealot, and he is generously accepting that risk to benefit us all greatly.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 11:14:25 pm
I didnt realised that Zealot killed anyone IRL.

He killed chars humans, banished them from the server life, then proceded to rape there bodies...

Yes its that terrible
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 11:15:48 pm
Thats almost it. Except the first part. The first bus was owned by Ecko Inc, and one of his drivers gave the keys to Zealot.

Wow, we pretty much have a perfect analogy now!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 14, 2011, 11:16:53 pm
Everyone calm down and shut up for a while, unless you're going to further analyze the car analogy. Stop pretending your opinions matter, and read this thread. It is long, it is glorious, and above all it says that there is literally NO DOWNSIDE to this. NONE. Everything will be better in every way with a dedicated new and better box devoted to strat with chadz COMPLETELY in control 100% with NO risk to you at all, instead of having Eckos server box groan as it accepts the sweaty heft of stategus, followed by Ecko saddling up and a grabbing hold of the crop whip. The only one who stands to lose anything if this doesn't work out is Zealot, and he is generously accepting that risk to benefit us all greatly.

Problem is Cheap Shot, the server will be owned by Zealot, meaning chadz is not in 100% control Zealot will have access to the server admin password, server functionality, settings, ban-lists, etc. The possibilities for abuse are endless.

The server cannot be put in Zealot's name.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 14, 2011, 11:17:06 pm
having Eckos server box groan as it accepts the sweaty heft of stategus

Stopped reading here and had to rub one out
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Bulzur on July 14, 2011, 11:18:28 pm
I like the way where this is going.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rhaelys on July 14, 2011, 11:18:57 pm
Thats almost it. Except the first part. The first bus was owned by Ecko Inc, and one of his drivers gave the keys to Zealot.

Almost. One of Ecko's drivers left the keys on the dashboard while he went to use the restroom. A random passenger on the bus used his quik-key mold kit to make a duplicate set of keys and kept them for himself. Ecko's driver, having returned to the bus from the restroom, proceeded to drive on and everyone was happy.

A few months later, the random passenger boarded the bus again, and sat next to Zealot. They befriended each other and then the random passenger, grateful for having someone actually talk to and like him, gave Zealot the set of duplicate keys as a token of friendship.

Late at night, after the normal bus schedule, Zealot went to where the bus was parked, and using the set of duplicate keys he proceeded to take it for a joy ride.

Zealot was banned permanently. The random passenger was banned for a week. Ecko's oblivious driver had his bus keys taken away.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 14, 2011, 11:20:00 pm
I didnt realised that Zealot killed anyone IRL.

Metaphor. Look it up.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 11:20:51 pm
Almost. One of Ecko's drivers left the keys on the dashboard while he went to use the restroom. A random passenger on the bus used his quik-key mold kit to make a duplicate set of keys and kept it for himself. Ecko's driver, having returned to the bus from the restroom, proceeded to drive on and everyone was happy.

A few months later, the random passenger boarded the bus again, and sat next to Zealot. They befriended each other and then the random passenger, grateful for having someone actually talk to and like him, gave Zealot the set of duplicate keys as a token of friendship.

Late at night, after the normal bus schedule, Zealot went to where the bus was parked, and using the set of duplicate keys he proceeded to take it for a joy ride.

Zealot was banned permanently. The random passenger was banned for a week. Ecko's oblivious driver had his bus keys taken away.


ME AND TOD ARE ANGRY, IT DOSENT INCLUDE CARS, ONLY BUSES RAGEEEEEEEEE
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 14, 2011, 11:21:23 pm
Changing the analogy from a car to a bus completely alters it's meaning from a violation of personal property to misuse of a public service. You can't just modify a cipher and hope to get the original meaning.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lorn on July 14, 2011, 11:22:17 pm
Look at me! I'm dancin'!!! I'm dancin'!!!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: WeeBo on July 14, 2011, 11:22:39 pm
Here is a 17 min audio clip of Ecko and Gaga having it out in CHAOS Team Speak .. ahaha

 http://www.filefactory.com/file/cc5801a/n/eckoVsgaga.wav


Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 14, 2011, 11:23:43 pm
Here is a 17 min audio clip of Ecko and Gaga having it out in CHAOS Team Speak .. ahaha

 http://www.filefactory.com/file/cc5801a/n/eckoVsgaga.wav

Excellent, more drama for me to nomnomnom on!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gildiss on July 14, 2011, 11:32:41 pm
And the thread slows to a halt to download and listen to the clip.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lorn on July 14, 2011, 11:35:44 pm
And the thread slows to a halt to download and listen to the clip.

And here I thought I had awed everyone into silence with my dancing skillz!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 14, 2011, 11:43:12 pm
Here is a 17 min audio clip of Ecko and Gaga having it out in CHAOS Team Speak .. ahaha

 http://www.filefactory.com/file/cc5801a/n/eckoVsgaga.wav

Just listen to it all. You missed out some of the shit in the beginning and at the end, but it got the gist of Ecko yelling at me.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 14, 2011, 11:43:56 pm
Just listen to it all. You missed out some of the shit in the beginning and at the end, but it got the gist of Ecko yelling at me.

yup yup
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 14, 2011, 11:44:47 pm
Just listen to it all. You missed out some of the shit in the beginning and at the end, but it got the gist of Ecko yelling at me.

So the rumor started in Hospitaller!

DUN Dun dun....  :lol:

But seriously guys, someone needs to make a c-RPG webcomic or sitcom based off of this drama we have every week!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Beans on July 14, 2011, 11:58:40 pm
So the rumor started in Hospitaller!

DUN Dun dun....  :lol:

But seriously guys, someone needs to make a c-RPG webcomic or sitcom based off of this drama we have every week!

Why? You can't write better stuff.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 12:02:40 am
Why? You can't write better stuff.

Just imagine this drama though with cartoons/comics to match along, visual help! Just rip the stuff wholesale but add "visual appeal" is what I am saying.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lorn on July 15, 2011, 12:04:35 am
Just imagine this drama though with cartoons/comics to match along, visual help! Just rip the stuff wholesale but add "visual appeal" is what I am saying.

There was a fellow that was making EU drama comics back on the TW forums, no idea what happened to them here.  :|
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 12:05:10 am
There was a fellow that was making EU drama comics back on the TW forums, no idea what happened to them here.  :|

Dang, must hunt that fella down.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: SeQuel on July 15, 2011, 12:07:00 am
FUCK I voted for zealot instead. +1 to ecko. Wish I could switch votes...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lorn on July 15, 2011, 12:07:11 am
Dang, must hunt that fella down.


He was 22nd...since the entire cRPG part of the TW forum was taken down I don't' remember his name.

FUCK I voted for zealot instead. +1 to ecko. Wish I could switch votes...

The poll does not matter.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: SeQuel on July 15, 2011, 12:12:10 am


He was 22nd...since the entire cRPG part of the TW forum was taken down I don't' remember his name.

The poll does not matter.

The poll doesn't matter? See and here I thought the community's opinion always mattered.

Derp?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 12:12:48 am
To the members of LLJK - Shut the fuck up, stop posting please god!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 12:13:20 am
To the members of LLJK - Shut the fuck up, stop posting please god!

Poor fella.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: SeQuel on July 15, 2011, 12:14:31 am
To the members of LLJK - Shut the fuck up, stop posting please god!

The goons, doing what there best at.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lorn on July 15, 2011, 12:23:13 am
The poll doesn't matter? See and here I thought the community's opinion always mattered.

Derp?

The poll does not matter.

If there's one external person that I'd first and foremost let the NA server run, it's Ecko. This is in no way an attempt to "overthrow" you or something.

But the NA community got weird lately. Lots of quarrels, lots of fighting, be it verbally or with actions. This is no good, not at all. So the offer to receive a totally neutral NA server was like the best thing that could happen. And I gladly accepted.

People claimed that we, the devs, didn't care for NA enough, and I think it was true. That's why we are looking forward to expanding our staff with NA admins and NA betatesters and whatnot.

Bottom line: it's better if strategus is run officially, than by a clan. Any clan.

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: KaMiKaZe_JoE on July 15, 2011, 12:28:17 am
ALMOST...TO...PAGE...SEVENTEEN
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 12:39:45 am
Almost!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: nuffen on July 15, 2011, 12:46:58 am
ALMOST...TO...PAGE...SEVENTEEN

50 posts per page = only 5 pages :p
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 15, 2011, 12:52:03 am
50 posts per page = only 5 pages :p

Yep
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damatacus_ATS on July 15, 2011, 12:56:55 am
the problem isn't that its run by a clan. If any other clan ran it, I would be fine with that. Chaos, Blackrose, NA based GK, etc. etc. they're all good folks. The problem is with Zealot. He is quite literally the last person I would ever pick to own a strategus server. You claim that ATS is accused of abusing power nearly a year ago, well just a few weeks ago zealot did one of the biggest abuses of the admin control panel in the history of c-rpg, arguably in warband. The issue that this same goon is the one who will own the server and have access to the admin passwords and everything. That is what the uproar is about.

If you cannot see the reason for concern behind that, then you must have been dropped as a child.

I just wanted to say that I was there that day when the server got reset during our strat battle. I can assure you it was just an accident, solanar reset all the servers to add new maps or something he was doing. He was not in the channel with us on vent, and he did not realize that we were in a strat battle. After it happened ecko got a hold of solanar, informed him of what had happened, and solanar came up into our channel and was very apologetic. Also, someone wrote earlier that this took place when we were losing, that is incorrect, we were never at any risk of losing, not before or after the reset.
As for the servers issue, I would not mind seeing a 2nd box for strat, and the idea of having it be official is good also. However, Ecko is a lot easier to get a hold of than chadz if something needs to be done with it. Since ecko is on very often, and always in contact with other clan leaders in the NA community. Also, I don't trust zealot at all, due to his history.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 15, 2011, 01:11:05 am
I believe at this point, this image needs to posted for all those that oppose Shik running a server paid by Zealot.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: okiN on July 15, 2011, 01:37:56 am
Here is a 17 min audio clip of Ecko and Gaga having it out in CHAOS Team Speak .. ahaha

 http://www.filefactory.com/file/cc5801a/n/eckoVsgaga.wav

Why do they keep calling him Zee-lot?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Mannhammer on July 15, 2011, 01:41:43 am
I just wanted to say that I was there that day when the server got reset during our strat battle. I can assure you it was just an accident, solanar reset all the servers to add new maps or something he was doing. He was not in the channel with us on vent, and he did not realize that we were in a strat battle. After it happened ecko got a hold of solanar, informed him of what had happened, and solanar came up into our channel and was very apologetic. Also, someone wrote earlier that this took place when we were losing, that is incorrect, we were never at any risk of losing, not before or after the reset.
As for the servers issue, I would not mind seeing a 2nd box for strat, and the idea of having it be official is good also. However, Ecko is a lot easier to get a hold of than chadz if something needs to be done with it. Since ecko is on very often, and always in contact with other clan leaders in the NA community. Also, I don't trust zealot at all, due to his history.

I was there too. True ATS was going to win the siege but.... they had sustained very heavy casualties and lost a lot of gear prior to the reset. The reset may have been a mistake but some horrible abuses did happen that day.
1st. ATS exploited the mistake: By the time the defenders of the NPC castle figured out what had happened and logged back in the defenders spawn was already being camped by ATS players. ATS never secured the spawn prior to the reset. This turned a costly victory into flawless one.
2nd Worst of all: ATS muzzled the communities response to this error. Anyone who brought it up on an ATS server(which at the time was the only NA cRPG server) was kicked, and posts in the forums in regards to this topic were removed.

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 01:42:12 am
As for the servers issue, I would not mind seeing a 2nd box for strat, and the idea of having it be official is good also. to be done with it. Since ecko is on very often, and always in contact with other clan leaders in the NA community. Also, I don't trust zealot at all, due to his history.

Except that the NA servers rely on donations, and Ecko could not affort the setup Zealot is bringing to the plate. Zealot is getting great unmatchable deals. We can literally get no better then this. In general. About anything. This is the best possible scenario for everyone. If Zealot wants to front all the cash for this, then damn, that's insanely nice of him and maybe he isn't such a bad guy really. I mean he did something wrong and stupid, and banned a hand full of people who were unbanned and back playing quickly, and he changed the server name to something cheeky which was also changed back quickly. When Ecko got there and found out that 1 person was messing around, he banned over 100 people, and held them hostage while he demanded to know where Zealot got the password. It turns out he didn't need to do that because Zealot took responsibility and gave Ecko the info he was looking for. It turned out the password was leaked by one of Eckos admins. Lax security. Woops. A few of those many banned players took a week to be unbanned. Someone will pick this apart and make more car analogies (I hope they do) but the simple fact is, no matter what happened, we are getting more then we could ever hope for, and we are getting it at literally 0 cost and 0 risk to ourselves. I have no clue how people can be against that when it has been repeated over and over that chadz is running it and Zealot is only paying the bill. I'd much rather have an impartial server then a clan leader playing emperor. It's important that everyone get more sides of the story then just that of Ecko, or ATS. Even though in the end all that matters is what chadz wants, which he has already made clear.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 01:48:58 am
I believe at this point, this image needs to posted for all those that oppose Shik running a server paid by Zealot.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


To the members of LLJK - Shut the fuck up, stop posting please god!

Seventeen pages.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 15, 2011, 01:53:57 am
Seventeen pages.

It was a good run.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Goretooth on July 15, 2011, 02:11:48 am
It was a good run.
Yep, see you on the battlefield.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Blondin on July 15, 2011, 02:17:44 am
As additional info:

Head Admin will most likely be Shik, who has a good knowledge of the NA community and will handpick a set of admins that are capable of keeping the server what it is supposed to be: a neutral and fair playing ground.

I don't understand the meaning of this poll since this is an official decision which aims to establish an official server.

How can any NA be against the idea of official server?
How can ATS be against an official server that is not lead by another clan but by dev team?

EU servers are managed by devs and admins come from many clan, there is way less drama cause the final boss is dev team, no biased judgement, no biased suspicion, this can be just good for NA community.

btw, i'm sure that many ATS admins (and other ofc) will be admin in new official server.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 02:22:53 am
Blondin, its not about ATS admins, the issue is that as Zealot and chadz have described it, the server would be owned by zealot, which  is a horrid idea considering his history.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: young cococnut juice on July 15, 2011, 02:24:31 am
Blondin, its not about ATS admins, the issue is that as Zealot and chadz have described it, the server would be owned by zealot, which  is a horrid idea considering his history.

then please explain WHY chadz couldn't just disconnect the server if zealot pulled some shit?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 02:26:39 am
Why even risk the hassle of all that? Just have the server owned by someone else.

If zealots wants to donate, great! But he is the furthest thing from a neutral party to own the server, which is what people are criticizing echo of.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: young cococnut juice on July 15, 2011, 02:30:53 am
Why even risk the hassle of all that? Just have the server owned by someone else.

If zealots wants to donate, great! But he is the furthest thing from a neutral party to own the server, which is what people are criticizing echo of.

zealot is paying for the server, not moderating the server. I guess if he wants he could like shut it down wants but at any time chadz could totally cut it off and it would go to ecko anyway. ecko is actively involved in server moderation.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rikthor on July 15, 2011, 02:34:05 am
Why even risk the hassle of all that? Just have the server owned by someone else.

If zealots wants to donate, great! But he is the furthest thing from a neutral party to own the server, which is what people are criticizing echo of.

By your own logic, Ecko shouldn't own much less admin a Strategus server then. Not a neutral party is he?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 02:40:08 am
zealot is paying for the server, not moderating the server. I guess if he wants he could like shut it down wants but at any time chadz could totally cut it off and it would go to ecko anyway. ecko is actively involved in server moderation.

You really think that if you owned and setup a server that you WOULDN'T have the server password? Pretty naive there.



By your own logic, Ecko shouldn't own much less admin a Strategus server then. Not a neutral party is he?

Ecko has never abused his position in strategus ever. Plus, the moderation of the server was not done by ATS alone, its done by BRD, Chaos, LLJK, hospitaler, dfc, and many more. I personally don't care who admins the strategus server, so long as they have proven themselves to be a wise choice. It seems that the only party who has serious complaint about management is Goons, and lets be honest here, you collectively earned all the crap thrown your way.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damatacus_ATS on July 15, 2011, 02:52:47 am
I was there too. True ATS was going to win the siege but.... they had sustained very heavy casualties and lost a lot of gear prior to the reset. The reset may have been a mistake but some horrible abuses did happen that day.
1st. ATS exploited the mistake: By the time the defenders of the NPC castle figured out what had happened and logged back in the defenders spawn was already being camped by ATS players. ATS never secured the spawn prior to the reset. This turned a costly victory into flawless one.
2nd Worst of all: ATS muzzled the communities response to this error. Anyone who brought it up on an ATS server(which at the time was the only NA cRPG server) was kicked, and posts in the forums in regards to this topic were removed.
We did not mean to exploit that reset, its just that in vent someone said that the server was back up so we all came back in, and the other team consisting mostly of pubs trickled in more slowly. As for repressing it, we did that cause chadz was getting upset about the level of drama caused by the incident.

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damatacus_ATS on July 15, 2011, 02:57:38 am
When Ecko got there and found out that 1 person was messing around, he banned over 100 people, and held them hostage while he demanded to know where Zealot got the password. It turns out he didn't need to do that because Zealot took responsibility and gave Ecko the info he was looking for.
It was the guy that made the copy of the key that came forward, not zealot.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 03:02:34 am
I don't know if this has been said already or not, because I just came back, but isn't a bunch of clans paying for a server (and donations) kind of better than a single person (Zealot) paying it by himself?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 03:19:06 am
I don't know if this has been said already or not, because I just came back, but isn't a bunch of clans paying for a server (and donations) kind of better than a single person (Zealot) paying it by himself?
In most cases, yes. But getting people to cough up the dough every month is pretty hard. A lot of people like to say it should be run by donations, but they clam up when it's time to open the wallet.

I think Zealot and chadz have said that donations will probably be accepted, but the server won't rely on them.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 03:21:04 am
In most cases, yes. But getting people to cough up the dough every month is pretty hard. A lot of people like to say it should be run by donations, but they clam up when it's time to open the wallet.

I think Zealot and chadz have said that donations will probably be accepted, but the server won't rely on them.

I don't think Zealot can pay for all the slots by himself, so tell me, who will?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 03:22:24 am
I don't think Zealot can pay for all the slots by himself, so tell me, who will?

Zealot and one other guy whose name I have forgotten will shoulder the entire burden, because they are just that nice.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 03:22:57 am
Zealot and one other guy whose name I have forgotten will shoulder the entire burden, because they are just that nice.

Is this sarcasm? Wylker, by the way, nothing is for certain right now on that topic, we're still discussing it (On the topic of the second dedicated for Strategus, I mean).

Anyway, once again: Shut the fuck up LLJK, just for good measure.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 03:23:12 am
I don't think Zealot can pay for all the slots by himself, so tell me, who will?
And you're privy to Zealot's finances how?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 03:27:01 am
Is this sarcasm? Wylker, by the way, nothing is for certain right now on that topic, we're still discussing it.

Anyway, once again: Shut the fuck up LLJK, just for good measure.

Not sarcasm... :/
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 03:28:32 am
Not sarcasm... :/

My bad, misread it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 03:40:05 am
Yes, I don't know about Zealot's finances. I sure don't want the mega troll who got the admin password and banned people for no reason on the main servers, gets in trouble on the LLJK server, and knows nothing about Strategus to be in charge of the box or server connection, whatever it is.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 03:43:17 am
Personally, even as a member of ATS, I'm willing to give Zealot the benefit of the doubt when it comes to this situation. This is money out of his pocket, so if he ends up trying to troll one day, who is he really hurting? He's out hundreds of dollars and we are out $0.00. Now, that does not mean I trust him at all, and I don't think he expects us to. He pulled some major shit hardly even a month ago and every time I've played with him, he's been a complete douche. This also applies to about 80% of any other LLJK I've played with since DAY ONE of my cRPG experience. No one can deny they are mostly trolls and shitty people to play with.

That being said, I don't want some random admins that know nothing about NA players or the community to come in and start doing what everyone complains about. Yes, I too have problems with some of the people we have appointed as admins, but at least I am familiar with them. Leaders and/or figures of authority need to be personable. No one likes Mr. Smith and his posse of nameless faces to come in and start busting heads. Yes, I know he's a dev., but I don't know him, and he doesn't know me. My concern is competence. I want people who deserve their responsibilities and can handle them. Also the fact that there are already like 4 NA servers that NO ONE plays on.....

TL;DR

I support this decision to an extent. Kudos to Zealot even if he is the most scummy person I know in cRPG.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 15, 2011, 03:53:09 am
Why even risk the hassle of all that? Just have the server owned by someone else.
Why?

New admins(Better, most likely, certainly more unbiased ones)
New Sever Box
Neutral Ownership
Devs supporting NA more than ever
Possibly an event server under neutral ownership. The perfect place for me to host a Huge Multi Clan Tourney for NA, much like the EU one that I recently reffed for, that was held on EU_3. This would have been much more difficult if it were held on a public server where several different people had the admin password. Week 1 in the tourney we had an issue with passwords and it was rather hectic for the refs.


If there ARE any issues that come about from this, it falls on the Dev team to handle it and own up to it since it's an official crpg server. There isn't really much reason for NA players to be worrying about this, the person who should be most concerned is chadz, as he would be the most affected by any abuse from Zealot. chadz and the rest of the Dev team would have to spend much of their time to fix anything serious that was caused by Zealot, yet with the amount of bitching going on in this thread, you'd think everyone's fortunes are at stake.

My concern is competence. I want people who deserve their responsibilities and can handle them.
Unlike NA servers, Official servers actually have an application process of some sort. So your concerns about this can easily be put to rest. There is no better way to ensure competence than by first setting standards for your administrators.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 03:58:27 am
Neutral Ownership


stopped reading right there. What on EARTH would make you think Zealot is neutral?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 03:59:05 am
It's going to happen, regardless of how the NA community, ATS and Ecko, or anyone else feels about it. However, you guys need to be more supportive of Ecko and his team. They have done a lot and everyone ignores that. Give him some credit. If anyone in NA is deserving of it, it's him.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gumdrawp on July 15, 2011, 04:05:04 am

stopped reading right there. What on EARTH would make you think Zealot is neutral?

I think hes referring to the fact that the admins will be crpg devs than the ownership of the box. I could be wrong though.

Either way i have no issues with LLJK paying for a box for shik/chadz to admin on.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tydeus on July 15, 2011, 04:10:42 am

stopped reading right there. What on EARTH would make you think Zealot is neutral?
Something about Ecko being a clan leader and Zealot being... not a clan leader? I'd say that's a good place to start at. If Ecko had set up the same sort of server so that we could have an Official NA server that he paid for, I'd call that fairly neutral as well. The point, is that it's an official server and here we have a guy whose talking about paying for the entire thing by himself. I don't know about you, but most individuals don't spend $300+ a month on a mere videogame. This alone should give him some credibility.

I think hes referring to the fact that the admins will be crpg devs than the ownership of the box. I could be wrong though.

Either way i have no issues with LLJK paying for a box for shik/chadz to admin on.
Indeed. The fact that it is an Official C-RPG server means that there will be standards to hold the admins to. More importantly, administrators will be accountable for their actions. There's one thing that the NA admins have disgustingly never had to worry about.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 04:13:50 am
Something about Ecko being a clan leader and Zealot being... not a clan leader? I'd say that's a good place to start at. If Ecko had set up the same sort of server so that we could have an Official NA server that he paid for, I'd call that fairly neutral as well. The point, is that it's an official server and here we have a guy whose talking about paying for the entire thing by himself. I don't know about you, but most individuals don't spend $300+ a month on a mere videogame. This alone should give him some credibility.
Indeed. The fact that it is an Official C-RPG server means that there will be standards to hold the admins to. More importantly, administrators will be accountable for their actions. There's one thing that the NA admins have disgustingly never had to worry about.

Yet couldn't it be a big troll from Zealot saying he will pay for it? Who knows if he has that money?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 04:14:36 am
Yet couldn't it be a big troll from Zealot saying he will pay for it? Who knows if he has that money?

We will find out in a week!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 04:25:32 am
Something about Ecko being a clan leader and Zealot being... not a clan leader? I'd say that's a good place to start at. If Ecko had set up the same sort of server so that we could have an Official NA server that he paid for, I'd call that fairly neutral as well. The point, is that it's an official server and here we have a guy whose talking about paying for the entire thing by himself. I don't know about you, but most individuals don't spend $300+ a month on a mere videogame. This alone should give him some credibility.

having money to burn is not an indication of a lack of bias/a lack to cause harm.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: young cococnut juice on July 15, 2011, 04:29:46 am
having money to burn is not an indication of a lack of bias/a lack to cause harm.

yes anyone in lljk is willing to put down thousands of dollars to troll. superb deduction sherlock

Yet couldn't it be a big troll from Zealot saying he will pay for it? Who knows if he has that money?

if he has no money, cool. someone else will pay for it. what's he gonna say, "lol im not gonna pay 4 it, gotcha"?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 04:32:10 am
wouldn't put it past him
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: young cococnut juice on July 15, 2011, 04:33:03 am
wouldn't put it past him

has he paid for a server before and then used it to troll? no? then shut up
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 04:35:53 am
wouldn't put it past him
Yes, clearly Zealot's master plan is to go "HAHAHA I CAN'T AFFORD THE SERVER WHAT AN AUDACIOUS JOKE I HAVE PLAYED". This will be funny to him for some reason.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 04:36:15 am
So impatient!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 04:38:18 am
has he paid for a server before and then used it to troll? no? then shut up

Has he stolen admin password to troll and ban dozens of players? Yes. Yes he has.


Once a troll, always a troll.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 04:38:57 am
Has he stolen admin password to troll and ban dozens of players? Yes. Yes he has.


Once a troll, always a troll.

I disagree... to the bottom part!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 04:39:05 am
.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 04:39:33 am
If LLJK wants to post and argue, try not to just be sarcastic trolls. You only affirm our opinions of you.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 04:40:15 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 15, 2011, 04:40:52 am
I disagree... to the bottom part!
Miley, you prove the bottom part  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 15, 2011, 04:41:12 am
Has he stolen admin password to troll and ban dozens of players? Yes. Yes he has.


Once a troll, always a troll.

Props to Seawied with his dedicated trolling. There is little doubt in my mind that Seawied brain is this broken for reals. Well played, but you shined too bright.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 04:41:51 am
I'm flat out calling it right now: giving the only NA strategus server to Zealot is a terrible idea that will end badly.

Want to have a dev picked admin'd NA strategus server? Great. Don't give it to Zealot though. He is not trustworthy.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 04:44:10 am
I'm flat out calling it right now: giving the only NA strategus server to Zealot is a terrible idea that will end badly.

Want to have a dev picked admin'd NA strategus server? Great. Don't give it to Zealot though. He is not trustworthy.

You literally have nothing to lose at all. Zero at risk. No one is asking you to empty your wallets into a strangers hands, or turn over your characters.

Honestly, Zealot can and is going to be fronting the bill, but I know for a fact and I and many other LLJK members have said they would willingly share the burden of cost. We like to troll, and have fun, but overall we aren't as deserving of a negative reputation as you would think. We enjoy the game a lot, and generous members are willing to go miles to do this for the community. Despite how much everyone struggles to twist our positive actions into sinister plots and bad intentions. LLJK are going to do a nice thing for all of you whether you like it or not.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 04:45:15 am
Miley, you prove the bottom part  :rolleyes:

Thank you Muffinzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. 8]
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 04:48:41 am
Cheap shot, I've never had a problem with you, but LLJK deserves its reputation entirely. Hellowrold's hacking into peoples accounts? Zealot's stealing an admin password and banning everyone? I'm not even going to attempt to list the crap LLJK has done on other games.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 04:49:07 am
You literally have nothing to lose at all. Zero at risk. No one is asking you to empty your wallets into a strangers hands, or turn over your characters.

Honestly, Zealot can and is going to be fronting the bill, but I know for a fact and I and many other LLJK members have said they would willingly share the burden of cost. We like to troll, and have fun, but overall we aren't as deserving of a negative reputation as you would think. We enjoy the game a lot, and generous members are willing to go miles to do this for the community. Despite how much everyone struggles to twist our positive actions into sinister plots and bad intentions. LLJK are going to do a nice thing for all of you whether you like it or not.

I agree with the first part.

However, you do most certainly deserve your reputation. Trolling is having fun at the expense of someone else's....no one appreciates that. Say what you will about ATS or Ecko or anyone else, but you guys need to look in the mirror and rethink the way you guys interact with the cRPG community. I know if I were in LLJK, I would agree. I wouldn't want to be hated on just because a bunch of other guys are complete assholes, but that's the reality of the situation. People are people and this is the reaction you can only expect.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 04:49:45 am
I'm not asking for any donations, not from LLJK, not from the community, not from anybody - let's not tread on this subject.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Snatch on July 15, 2011, 04:53:42 am
Cheap shot, I've never had a problem with you, but LLJK deserves its reputation entirely. Hellowrold's hacking into peoples accounts? Zealot's stealing an admin password and banning everyone? I'm not even going to attempt to list the crap LLJK has done on other games.

Hellowrold is bird clan. I nor do any LLJK leaders have control over Bird clan, they left or were banished for a reason.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: young cococnut juice on July 15, 2011, 04:54:30 am
Cheap shot, I've never had a problem with you, but LLJK deserves its reputation entirely. Hellowrold's hacking into peoples accounts? Zealot's stealing an admin password and banning everyone? I'm not even going to attempt to list the crap LLJK has done on other games.

zealot "stole" (aka heard) an admins password and proceeded to unleash a holocaust of a couple bans (reversed) and a server rename. sa does pull shit in other games but people take video games way too seriously
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 04:58:19 am
zealot "stole" (aka heard) an admins password and proceeded to unleash a holocaust of a couple bans (reversed) and a server rename. sa does pull shit in other games but people take video games way too seriously

Are you trying to say Zealot's behavior is excusable? Game or not, his actions were unappreciated and even he recognizes that. Don't try to defend that.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 04:58:31 am
To the members of LLJK - Shut the fuck up, stop posting please god!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 15, 2011, 05:01:32 am
Classical, did you really expect LLJK to not troll and spam such a drama filled topic?  :lol:  I'm afraid I have added a little too much myself.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 05:03:54 am
Well we'll see how long you can be paying $300 a month for a game you're new to.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 05:08:45 am
I'm not asking for any donations, not from LLJK, not from the community, not from anybody - let's not tread on this subject.

SHUT YO MOUTH YOU GONNA GET EM! PUNK!

Cheap shot, I've never had a problem with you, but LLJK deserves its reputation entirely.

But I'm LLJK, and I behave myself in game, like most of the LLJK I play with on BATTLE_TX. You have never have a problem with me because there is nothing to have a problem about. I'm a good player and I've never done anything to the contrary. One member crossed the line and is making amends for it right now, another left us to do what he did because he knew we wouldn't condone it, and is banned now, as he expected to be. Other then that not much. Verbal trolling and things that don't really matter. Most clans are not strangers to that though. We never exploit for experience or gain or any abuse of the system for profit. It's a strict "all in good fun" motto, and even then we keep to our own server these days. Honestly, we fill a lot of server slots, and bring a lot of new players to cRPG. And after next week, a LLJK member will have done more for the community then most would ever do. If you give him the chance. He's a reasonable guy, even now trying to calm down the goons and keep the trolling in the thread at bay. And as for this...

I'm not even going to attempt to list the crap LLJK has done on other games.

There are 150k + Goons, and you'd be hard pressed to find one that doesn't like video games. We are most likely not even the same people. I probably haven't even played the games you're thinking of.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: KaMiKaZe_JoE on July 15, 2011, 05:13:45 am
Zealot cannot pay for my server (the only one running cRPG in the whole world, btw), for he is a terrorist, as has been made evident by his past actions. Therefore, all of LLJK are terrorists, and should be subject to sweeping generalizations as to the content of their character whenever the topic comes up. Or is remotely hinted at, like if the letter "L" is aspied somewhere, doubtless up to trolling.

I'd continue being sarcastic and dicky, but many of the people in this thread have taken up the role of bundle of sticks  (not the good kind, either), and would be unappreciative of my insightfull insight. I will, however, go to sleep tonight cuddling the comforting knowledge that this thread will be several pages longer when I wake up like a great, big, retarded teddy bear.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 05:22:30 am
Zealot cannot pay for my server (the only one running cRPG in the whole world, btw), for he is a terrorist, as has been made evident by his past actions. Therefore, all of LLJK are terrorists, and should be subject to sweeping generalizations as to the content of their character whenever the topic comes up. Or is remotely hinted at, like if the letter "L" is aspied somewhere, doubtless up to trolling.

I'd continue being sarcastic and dicky, but many of the people in this thread have taken up the role of bundle of sticks  (not the good kind, either), and would be unappreciative of my insightfull insight. I will, however, go to sleep tonight cuddling the comforting knowledge that this thread will be several pages longer when I wake up like a great, big, retarded teddy bear.

These are the kinds of pseudo-humerous sarcastic troll posts that no one appreciates. Leave those out and contribute to the discussion.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: dynamike on July 15, 2011, 05:27:40 am
Let's make this easy:


This way he can still give something to the community, improve his reputation and at the same time be completely out of doubt when something bad happens with the server.

Because let's face it: if Zealot owns the server, the most minor fuck-up will cost him his rep again.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 05:31:11 am

DISCLAIMER
: I'd like to state for the record however, this is not a LLJK thing and LLJK isn't involved beyond approving wholeheartedly of this development. It's a Zealot production with special effects by Wylker and their generosity is solely theirs. Any money LLJK members forcibly cram down his resisting throat are an unrelated incident.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 05:31:20 am
Cheap shot, I've never had a problem with you, but LLJK deserves its reputation entirely. Hellowrold's hacking into peoples accounts? Zealot's stealing an admin password and banning everyone? I'm not even going to attempt to list the crap LLJK has done on other games.
Hellowrold A)Wasn't LLJK and B)Was immediately disowned by Goons because of just how stupid he was.

Zealot has not only admitted to only doing what he did while inebriated, he's agreed that the actions taken against him were appropriate and is trying to make up for it.

As for "what LLJK has done in other games", take a look at this:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

See that? 150,000 members. We're not the same people. We don't know what other games you're talking about.  Yammering on about what "we" did in Darkfall or Rifts or WOW or whatever the fuck is the most retarded thing ever. We don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 05:31:59 am
Let's make this easy:

  • Zealot wanting to change his ways, giving something back to the community and offering to sponsor a server --> + 1
  • Zealot not wanting control over the server and letting neutral devs pick the admins --> + 1
  • Zealot still being mistrusted by the community and being the server OWNER who can, theoretically, mess around with our Strat fun --> - 1
  • Zealot donating the money, letting somebody neutral BUY AND OWN the server and admin on it --> PROFIT

This way he can still give something to the community, improve his reputation and at the same time be completely out of doubt when something bad happens with the server.

Because let's face it: if Zealot owns the server, the most minor fuck-up will cost him his rep again.


Apparently this makes too much sense for the devs to implement.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Iggore on July 15, 2011, 05:34:07 am
So yeah, this is chadz game and if i remember right a happy chadz is a coding chads and i'm all for it.... 
people keep forgetting this isn't a democracy ;) it's pure monarchy... and chadz is king!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Visus on July 15, 2011, 05:38:20 am
Let's make this easy:

  • Zealot donating the money, letting somebody neutral BUY AND OWN the server and admin on it --> PROFIT


Honestly. If this random LLJK goon wants to spend his own money, on something that will benefit all of the NA community, while giving full control of the server over to a neutral dev-based team....What kind of idiot would say no to this?

I'm all for it. He wants to show good will, fine. He wants to repair his rep, fine. It benefits all of us, the players.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: ManOfWar on July 15, 2011, 05:42:59 am
Let's make this easy:

  • Zealot wanting to change his ways, giving something back to the community and offering to sponsor a server --> + 1
  • Zealot not wanting control over the server and letting neutral devs pick the admins --> + 1
  • Zealot still being mistrusted by the community and being the server OWNER who can, theoretically, mess around with our Strat fun --> - 1
  • Zealot donating the money, letting somebody neutral BUY AND OWN the server and admin on it --> PROFIT

This way he can still give something to the community, improve his reputation and at the same time be completely out of doubt when something bad happens with the server.

Because let's face it: if Zealot owns the server, the most minor fuck-up will cost him his rep again.

yup....

Take the deal ecko!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 05:46:13 am
Honestly. If this random LLJK goon wants to spend his own money, on something that will benefit all of the NA community, while giving full control of the server over to a neutral dev-based team....What kind of idiot would say no to this?

I'm all for it. He wants to show good will, fine. He wants to repair his rep, fine. It benefits all of us, the players.

Who pays 300$ a month to repair his reputation on a game he just started and knows nothing about?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: dynamike on July 15, 2011, 05:49:09 am
yup....

Take the deal ecko!

ManO you misunderstand: based on the current deal Zealot would be the OWNER of the server. This is what the community is... hesitant against.

My suggestion is for him to donate the money instead and not OWN the server himself. This would truly show goodwill.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 05:50:20 am
Who the fuck is paying three hundred a month?

Quote
<Zealot__> I'm not donating money as it is, I'm donating a server. I'm on billing to handle bandwidth overtures, freak payments, and any other bills that come to me and are responsible to me.

Time will tell if I'm using these servers to infect you with viruses and steal your credit card information!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 05:50:50 am
Who pays 300$ a month to repair his reputation on a game he just started and knows nothing about?
Zealot started three months ago, and has been actively playing since. He also already runs a CRPG server (LLJK_Duel). It's not like he's going into this blind.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Visus on July 15, 2011, 05:51:59 am
Who pays 300$ a month to repair his reputation on a game he just started and knows nothing about?

Does it really matter how much/why/how he is paying? Just accept the gift and be thankful. Unless you want to play Strat on a shitty overtaxed server.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 05:55:11 am
Does it really matter how much/why/how he is paying? Just accept the gift and be thankful. Unless you want to play Strat on a shitty overtaxed server.

He can be trolling right? He could decide, "Hmm I don't feel like paying aymore." There goes our Strategus server.

So how much does it cost for a 200 slot server?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Visus on July 15, 2011, 05:58:53 am
He can be trolling right? He could decide, "Hmm I don't feel like paying aymore." There goes our Strategus server.

So how much does it cost for a 200 slot server?
Then we switch back to the ATS servers. It's not like they are going anywhere. Besides, Ecko can be the savior of NA if that happens, receiving full "I was always right" brag-ability. :D  I think he would like that.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 06:00:11 am
You don't buy it based on slots, but specs, and those are to be decided, something beefy and beastly. It's just a matter of configuration, as EU servers offer a lot more hardware for a lot less money in terms of conversion, so we need to match their servers with similar specs, and similar costs.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: ManOfWar on July 15, 2011, 06:00:24 am
ManO you misunderstand: based on the current deal Zealot would be the OWNER of the server. This is what the community is... hesitant against.

My suggestion is for him to donate the money instead and not OWN the server himself. This would truly show goodwill.

Eiether way it does not matter! IF he screws with the server as a owner..

chadz cna just reset all the damage done and the ball would be in ecko's court, simple as that

The damage that cna be down is minimal and since this is all free, we have very... very... little to lose
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Loki on July 15, 2011, 06:04:49 am
It makes a lot more sense to have strategus servers be ran and controlled by c-rpg admins and not privately owned servers.  Even Ecko should see that this is an improvement since Zealot won't have any control over the server.

But why leave it there with a reasonable argument when I can cause drama.

TOP 5 REASONS ATS SHOULDN'T HAVE ANY C-RPG SERVERS:
1. They reset the strategus server during their own battles when they start losing.
2. They hand out administration-ships for political gain.
3. They ban players during strategus battles for simply saying things they don't want to hear.
4. They had a policy of allowing hate-speech (and often use it) [I think I've been called a my old friend over 1000 times by ATS].
5. Did I mention they reset the server when they were losing a battle?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 06:05:50 am
It makes a lot more sense to have strategus servers be ran and controlled by c-rpg admins and not privately owned servers.  Even Ecko should see that this is an improvement since Zealot won't have any control over the server.

But why leave it there with a reasonable argument when I can cause drama.

TOP 5 REASONS ATS SHOULDN'T HAVE ANY C-RPG SERVERS:
1. They reset the strategus server during their own battles when they start losing.
2. They hand out administration-ships for political gain.
3. They ban players during strategus battles for simply saying things they don't want to hear.
4. They had a policy of allowing hate-speech (and often use it) [I think I've been called a my old friend over 1000 times by ATS].
5. Did I mention they reset the server when they were losing a battle?

Facts contained in this post: 0
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rannepear on July 15, 2011, 06:06:45 am
Facts contained in this post: 0

Well, he is Fallen. I'm sure everyone on NA has called him a my old friend 10000 times.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 06:07:51 am
Well, he is Fallen. I'm sure everyone on NA has called him a my old friend 10000 times.

Archers do tend to make people rage  :?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: ManOfWar on July 15, 2011, 06:11:14 am
It makes a lot more sense to have strategus servers be ran and controlled by c-rpg admins and not privately owned servers.  Even Ecko should see that this is an improvement since Zealot won't have any control over the server.

But why leave it there with a reasonable argument when I can cause drama.

TOP 5 REASONS ATS SHOULDN'T HAVE ANY C-RPG SERVERS:
1. They reset the strategus server during their own battles when they start losing.
2. They hand out administration-ships for political gain.
3. They ban players during strategus battles for simply saying things they don't want to hear.
4. They had a policy of allowing hate-speech (and often use it) [I think I've been called a my old friend over 1000 times by ATS].
5. Did I mention they reset the server when they were losing a battle?

A dumbass appears

use logic and critical reading skills! It's super effective!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Visus on July 15, 2011, 06:12:28 am
A Fallen Archer dumbass appears

That answers why you get called mean things by the other kids. Stop running away.



Bitch.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 06:17:11 am
That answers why you get called mean things by the other kids. Stop running away.



Bitch.

Stop meleeing in my Shooting.



Bitch.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Visus on July 15, 2011, 06:20:46 am
Stop meleeing in my Shooting.



Bitch.
Touche
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Loki on July 15, 2011, 06:49:50 am
Let me tell you a story:

Last October ATS finally decided to get up off their laurels and try to take a neutral castle with 8000 troops all in cherburg armor, winged helmets and becs.  Against them were 4000 lightly armored AI equipped troops.  Half an hour into the battle ATS was down to 4000 troops while the neutral castle still had 2500 troops.  This was a huge embarrassment; throwing 4000 troops and millions of gold down the drain just for a simple neutral castle.  Then, the server goes down, the players fighting for the neutral castle didn't know that Gorath (formerly ATS) had reset the strategus server.  20 minutes later neutral players start trickling back into the server only to find that ATS was now back to 8000 troops and had surrounded the spawns.  Obviously people were absolutely livid that such a blatant abuse would take place.  When people started calling them out for what they were, cheaters, the ATS admins started kicking and banning people from the server.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 06:58:07 am
Touche

Bitch is a bad word.    :oops:

EDIT:
I also like that everyone apparently missed this line:
But why leave it there with a reasonable argument when I can cause drama.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Devilize on July 15, 2011, 07:22:41 am
Let me tell you a story:

Last October ATS finally decided to get up off their laurels and try to take a neutral castle with 8000 troops all in cherburg armor, winged helmets and becs.  Against them were 4000 lightly armored AI equipped troops.  Half an hour into the battle ATS was down to 4000 troops while the neutral castle still had 2500 troops.  This was a huge embarrassment; throwing 4000 troops and millions of gold down the drain just for a simple neutral castle.  Then, the server goes down, the players fighting for the neutral castle didn't know that Gorath (formerly ATS) had reset the strategus server.  20 minutes later neutral players start trickling back into the server only to find that ATS was now back to 8000 troops and had surrounded the spawns.  Obviously people were absolutely livid that such a blatant abuse would take place.  When people started calling them out for what they were, cheaters, the ATS admins started kicking and banning people from the server.

Not trying to help or hinder just simply wanted to say that I was there at that siege fighting against ATS at the time. Just started playing back then. Good times.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Huey Newton on July 15, 2011, 07:24:26 am
Let me tell you a story:

Last October ATS finally decided to get up off their laurels and try to take a neutral castle with 8000 troops all in cherburg armor, winged helmets and becs.  Against them were 4000 lightly armored AI equipped troops.  Half an hour into the battle ATS was down to 4000 troops while the neutral castle still had 2500 troops.  This was a huge embarrassment; throwing 4000 troops and millions of gold down the drain just for a simple neutral castle.  Then, the server goes down, the players fighting for the neutral castle didn't know that Gorath (formerly ATS) had reset the strategus server.  20 minutes later neutral players start trickling back into the server only to find that ATS was now back to 8000 troops and had surrounded the spawns.  Obviously people were absolutely livid that such a blatant abuse would take place.  When people started calling them out for what they were, cheaters, the ATS admins started kicking and banning people from the server.

I remember this.
I lol'ed
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lordark on July 15, 2011, 08:06:39 am
Hey Loki :!:


Ura my old friend :wink:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Devilize on July 15, 2011, 08:07:16 am
Hey Huey, just wanted to give my condolences to our dead class. RIP cav.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Miley on July 15, 2011, 08:12:36 am
Black Sarranid Dress is orange and dark orange... WHAT!

EDIT: Sorry, I meant orange-red and dark-orange-red!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: AntiBlitz on July 15, 2011, 08:18:31 am
Let me tell you a story:

Last October ATS finally decided to get up off their laurels and try to take a neutral castle with 8000 troops all in cherburg armor, winged helmets and becs.  Against them were 4000 lightly armored AI equipped troops.  Half an hour into the battle ATS was down to 4000 troops while the neutral castle still had 2500 troops.  This was a huge embarrassment; throwing 4000 troops and millions of gold down the drain just for a simple neutral castle.  Then, the server goes down, the players fighting for the neutral castle didn't know that Gorath (formerly ATS) had reset the strategus server.  20 minutes later neutral players start trickling back into the server only to find that ATS was now back to 8000 troops and had surrounded the spawns.  Obviously people were absolutely livid that such a blatant abuse would take place.  When people started calling them out for what they were, cheaters, the ATS admins started kicking and banning people from the server.

Thanks for the reiteration there loki, it really helped pan out a lovely story, was quite amusing.  Unfortunately what you have failed to see is, that this above topic was already covered approx.  Ooooh idk, 7 other times in the past 21 pages.  Now why dont you come back to the table once you have something worth discussing that moves the argument forward.  Thank you!

Yours truly, AntiBlitz
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Huey Newton on July 15, 2011, 08:31:37 am
Hey Huey, just wanted to give my condolences to our dead class. RIP cav.

yeah its tougher now but you know me
I'll be cav in this game till the day they remove horses

 :)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: PieParadox on July 15, 2011, 08:38:58 am
I read up to page 13 thumbing down troll/ thoughtless comments then gave up...

Quote from Zealots post (which I couldn't find):
(click to show/hide)

Anyways... It seems that Zealot not only gets Strat server, but ALL OF THE ATS NA servers? Or will the ATS servers still be run, with the exception of Strat? I don't think many problems will arise if he only handles Strat, but if he handles EVERY server... I am highly against this due to his past ideas.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 08:41:07 am
New servers, ats will still run as normal but the duel server will be a duel server and not strat for an indefinite period of time.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gorath on July 15, 2011, 08:43:35 am
Yes please.

What do we need 3 more NA servers for anyway? (Strat, Battle and Siege?) chadz, Ecko, can't we just make the ATS servers official instead? Most people already play there. Maybe make the Siege server into an unofficial ATS whatever (battle, siege or DTV, it can rotate) and the Battle and Strat become official?

chadz, my main worry if Zealot pays for the server is that he will then have access to the box. Not the admin password, but the actual server. I feel like he could have a field day messing with stuff in there. Some examples off the top of my head:

- Big LLJK Strat battle coming up. Its key that they win or they lose a city. An hour before the battle, Zealot calls the server host and has them disconnect it. Voila, LLJK doesn't lose its castle.
- Someone Zealot or a goon friend doesn't like is having a big battle... same thing
- Someone Zealot doesn't like gets mysteriously added to the ban list (editing server files.)
- The official servers are all renamed "C-RPG_Ecko_Is_Gay"

Honestly I'm not sure I trust him. Awesome if he wants to pay for the server, but unless he's sending you money via paypal and you or another dev is handling setting up everything and paying for the servers, I can't feel comfortable with this.
^
This.  Letting a goon have control over the "official" servers is like having einstein have host your bar mitzvah.  Much less a goon that already terrorized the NA community with mass bannings from an abused admin password and applauds the character deletions by another goon from players he doesn't like on their forums.

I mean seriously, as a judgement call this one is horrid.

As for "what LLJK has done in other games", take a look at this:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

See that? 150,000 members. We're not the same people. We don't know what other games you're talking about.  Yammering on about what "we" did in Darkfall or Rifts or WOW or whatever the fuck is the most retarded thing ever. We don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Except you all not only purposefully joined an organization who's entire purpose is to piss everyone off, be cunts and ruin games but you wanted to join this collection of flaming fuckwads so badly you paid the membership fee to do so.  That says so much about every one of your member's personal character and moral compass alone.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: PieParadox on July 15, 2011, 08:47:21 am
Haha Destiny, you would post useful information for me at 2:00 A.M.  :twisted:

I can only think that he is genuinely helping out the NA community, or that he may have an elaborate plan...



Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 08:52:27 am
Haha Destiny, you would post useful information for me at 2:00 A.M.  :twisted:

Hehehe, yesh. Now if only I was at a real computer, then I coul be playing cRPG too!

Oh wait I am a computer, one of those japanese model look-alikes that kinda are creepy fake people... I never sleep :/
I can only think that he is genuinely helping out the NA community, or that he may have an elaborate plan...

Only time will tell...DUN Dun dun! *cues more suspenseful music*
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: PhantomZero on July 15, 2011, 09:15:06 am
Letting a goon have control over the "official" servers is like having einstein have host your bar mitzvah. 

Maybe if einstein had hosted a few bar mitzvahs, maybe he wouldn't have been such an asshole.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 09:23:34 am
It's become clear that people like Gorath will never be satisfied. There's no arguing with someone who isn't able to differentiate between the actions of different people (whether in a small group like LLJK-CRPG or the SA community as a whole), and I don't think anything is gained by listening to the lamentations of someone who's still bitter than Goons messed up their Everquest guild or EVE corp or whatever.

I'm sorry that people like that won't be able to be convinced of the benefits of the coming situation, but in the end it doesn't really matter.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gorath on July 15, 2011, 09:29:32 am
It's become clear that people like Gorath will never be satisfied.

Sure I will.  Simply put a "Donate to NA official servers" button up there next to the EU one and let chadz set up the official servers that way.  Having lljk "own" the server automatically makes it tainted.  There hasn't been a single game you guys have been in (goons) that you haven't exploited, hacked, cheated, griefed and trolled the shit out of.

Don't want ATS to run the official servers?  Cool, fine, I can support that.  Don't want ANY clan to do so?  I like that even better.  Official NA servers through donations only imo.  If zealot wants to click a donate button and donate 300 a month, great.  Having him actually pay the company directly gives him access and control to the product, period.  And that's just retarded.

*You also didn't do anything to argue against my point.  Simply la'la'la'd the same shit about "We're all different people though!" even though you joined the fuckwad organization of the internet knowingly, willingly, purposefully and by fucking paying money to do so.  Goddammit, I want to join a hate group that sets fires to peoples property and otherwise harrasses and terrorizes the public at random so badly that I'm going to pay for the priviledge!  But hey, don't hate me guys!  I'm different!  I'm a nice guy!"   :rolleyes:  *
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 09:30:14 am
I read up to page 13 thumbing down troll/ thoughtless comments then gave up...

Quote from Zealots post (which I couldn't find):
(click to show/hide)

Anyways... It seems that Zealot not only gets Strat server, but ALL OF THE ATS NA servers? Or will the ATS servers still be run, with the exception of Strat? I don't think many problems will arise if he only handles Strat, but if he handles EVERY server... I am highly against this due to his past ideas.

Nothing is happening to Ecko's servers. This doesn't effect Ecko at all other then he doesn't get a position he tried to appoint himself to for some reason. The EU Official servers are run by chadz, I don't get why Ecko thought he should run the NA ones instead. Zealot is also uninvolved mostly and is just buying and giving servers to chadz who will be doing all the managing himself. These servers will be run completely by chadz & devs, and will cost none of you anything. There is no risk. Man common people, the same things are getting repeated over and over and no one is getting it because you think you're being wronged somehow by someone donating brand new servers to you which you'll get to use for free. What the hell.  :o

This.  Letting a goon have control over the "official" servers is like having einstein have host your bar mitzvah.

einstein comparisons? Really? Classy. It wont be a "Goon" server. LLJK has nothing to do it with. Zealot decided to do this alone and its not some clan offering. Get your facts sorted and read this mess of a thread before you set your mind in stone.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 15, 2011, 09:31:29 am
Let me tell you a story:

Last October ATS finally decided to get up off their laurels and try to take a neutral castle with 8000 troops all in cherburg armor, winged helmets and becs.  Against them were 4000 lightly armored AI equipped troops.  Half an hour into the battle ATS was down to 4000 troops while the neutral castle still had 2500 troops.  This was a huge embarrassment; throwing 4000 troops and millions of gold down the drain just for a simple neutral castle.  Then, the server goes down, the players fighting for the neutral castle didn't know that Gorath (formerly ATS) had reset the strategus server.  20 minutes later neutral players start trickling back into the server only to find that ATS was now back to 8000 troops and had surrounded the spawns.  Obviously people were absolutely livid that such a blatant abuse would take place.  When people started calling them out for what they were, cheaters, the ATS admins started kicking and banning people from the server.
Nice lies, go back and find my post where I answer this retarded claim (if you can find it in this e-drama filled thread).  I'm getting sick of it tbh, and I wasn't even in ATS then (just joined recently cos my clan all left cRPG). 


edit: Gorath, that was the most amazing post I've seen in a while.  I fail to rival you, I think I'm too nice. :/
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 09:34:19 am
There hasn't been a single game you guys have been in (goons) that you haven't exploited, hacked, cheated, griefed and trolled the shit out of.
And again Gorath, the Something Awful community is over 150,000 people. We are not those same people. Period.

Also, for a guy throwing out einstein comparisons, you seem remarkably predisposed to judging and demeaning large groups of people due to their community of origin.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gorath on July 15, 2011, 09:38:19 am
Zealot is also uninvolved mostly and is just buying and giving servers to chadz 
This makes this:
It wont be a "Goon" server.
false.

I've paid for and run servers before.  If I "buy and give" a server to someone I still OWN THE SERVER as I'm the one dealing with the server provider.  This means that at all times I have full access to do what I want with the server.  Period.  Zealot will be in this position.  Period.

And yup, einstein comparisons.  I try to find a proper comparison for a narcissistic and sociopathic person that went out of his way to harrass and treat other people like shit.  You know, like the goon organization as a whole.

Slanted:  It's not a community of ORIGIN.  Sorry bud, your defense is completely wrong.  It's a community of CHOICE that you purposefully joined.  Complete difference.  If I join the KKK I can't claim that it's my community of ORIGIN and that I shouldn't be discriminated against because of it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 09:40:15 am
And yup, einstein comparisons.  I try to find a proper comparison for a narcissistic and sociopathic person that went out of his way to harrass and treat other people like shit.  You know, like the goon organization as a whole.
So, would you say we're a community of Goraths? Cause that description is remarkably familiar.

And as I was posting this, you edited yours to compare us to the KKK. Good job.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 15, 2011, 09:41:25 am
And again Gorath, the Something Awful community is over 150,000 people. We are not those same people. Period.

Also, for a guy throwing out einstein comparisons, you seem remarkably predisposed to judging and demeaning large groups of people due to their community of origin.
You PAID MONEY to join a community of bundle of stickss who try to grief, hack, troll, and abuse every game they play.  That, my friend, makes you one of them.  Guilty by association as it were, at the least.  If you don't want to be associated with them, then leave the bloody organization, its not that hard.  I'm getting tired of this lame defense of "oh I'm not a retarded douchebag even though I'm in a clan full of them, don't be mean to me."  It won't fly, kid.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gorath on July 15, 2011, 09:52:01 am
So, would you say we're a community of Goraths? Cause that description is remarkably familiar. 
Yup, cause I've gone out of my way to:
Exploit
Hack
Excessively TK
Spout millions of racial epithets and other trolling rage/hate speech at other players in game
Seek out RL info about other players in order to harrass and attack them
Mass banned anyone (Hell, I never was a part of this and even unbanned quite a few LLJK on principle of being a fair admin in general.  Including Eyebeatwomen who has a mutual hatred of me)
Gone out of my way to troll/grief and otherwise ruin the game/fun of the other players in the server

owait, that's not an accurate comparison at all come to think of it.   :rolleyes:

There's thousands of gaming clans out there.  So very many of them are multi-game clans as well.  Yet you specifically joined the Goons for what reason exactly?  So you could be part of a clan that upholds high moral standards and sportsmanship?  A group that treats everyone well and with common courtesy and respect? 

Right, you joined a group that basically lives to metaphorically shit on everyone else on the planet and is famous for trying to do exactly that.  Sorry, nothing about your defense makes any logical sense.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK on July 15, 2011, 10:02:21 am
  Goddammit, I want to join a hate group that sets fires to peoples property and otherwise harrasses and terrorizes the public at random so badly that I'm going to pay for the priviledge!  But hey, don't hate me guys!  I'm different!  I'm a nice guy!"   :rolleyes:  *

hahah because playing video games is like destroying pepole's property. you're good man.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Duster on July 15, 2011, 10:11:34 am
this thread is dildos
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Slantedfloors on July 15, 2011, 10:13:47 am
There's thousands of gaming clans out there.  So very many of them are multi-game clans as well.  Yet you specifically joined the Goons for what reason exactly?  So you could be part of a clan that upholds high moral standards and sportsmanship?  A group that treats everyone well and with common courtesy and respect? 

Right, you joined a group that basically lives to metaphorically shit on everyone else on the planet and is famous for trying to do exactly that.  Sorry, nothing about your defense makes any logical sense.
Well for one, I didn't join SA to be in a gaming clan. I doubt any LLJK did. Doing so is frowned upon, and outright bannable in a lot of cases. SA isn't a "gaming clan", that's just one of the many many subcultures it's developed over the years.

I joined SA because I wanted to be part of community that consistently created some of the funniest material on the internet. I wanted to join a group that donated body armour to dozens of under-equipped US troops stationed in Iraq, and raised so much money for Hurricane Katrina victims that it was flagged by PayPal as a possible front for money-laundering. And I especially wanted to participate in an internet forum that was heavily moderated and had rules against "LOL FIRST POST BUMPIN' DIS THREAD HAMSTER PANCAKE HAT LOL".

All I've been trying to do in this thread is be reasonable and allay some of the fears people had. You guys can keep posting about how we're KKK bundle of sticks chocolate chip cookies who want to burn down the Lincoln Memorial or whatever, but I'm done trying to talk to brick walls.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK on July 15, 2011, 10:16:31 am
butttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttts
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gorath on July 15, 2011, 10:17:22 am
hahah because playing video games is like destroying pepole's property. you're good man.

Actually it is.

Property is a product of peoples:
time
money
effort

Or some combination thereof.  A person's progress in these video games that you destroy is the product of said person's:
time
money (sometimes continuously if there's monthly fees)
effort

So in the end, when you get down to it, the principle of the matter is the same.

I spend 100's of hours of my TIME working (EFFORT), 1000's of dollars of my MONEY to buy a car and then you vandalize it.
I spend 100's of hours of my TIME grinding/practicing (EFFORT), on a game I purchased to play a mod on a server I donated to (MONEY) and then you ruin it (griefing, trolling, exploiting, cheating, deleting characters, harrassing, etc).

In the end the moral principle behind both are exactly the same.  Your argument is the same as saying that stealing candy from children is ok because it's not stealing money from a bank.  Stealing is stealing is stealing.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK on July 15, 2011, 10:30:34 am
haha man i love you
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gildiss on July 15, 2011, 10:35:21 am

I spend 100's of hours of my TIME working (EFFORT), 1000's of dollars of my MONEY to buy a car and then you vandalize it.
I spend 100's of hours of my TIME grinding/practicing (EFFORT), on a game I purchased to play a mod on a server I donated to (MONEY) and then you ruin it (griefing, trolling, exploiting, cheating, deleting characters, harrassing, etc).

I didn't think we could pull it off but you did it, another car analogy.
Blast fax kudos all around.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gorath on July 15, 2011, 10:47:37 am
I joined SA because I wanted to be part of community that consistently created some of the funniest material on the internet.
You mean /4chan, SASS and those other gems?  Yep... comedy gold.  Oh, you mean all the insulting of everyone going on?  Yeah, that's funny shit too.  owait.  Have you read the SA forums?

I wanted to join a group that donated body armour to dozens of under-equipped US troops stationed in Iraq
USO, Soldier's Angels, Operation Gratitude, Operation Helmet, Vest for Life, etc and so on.
and raised so much money for Hurricane Katrina victims that it was flagged by PayPal as a possible front for money-laundering.
Hurricane Katrina Relief, Red Cross, Network for Good, etc etc etc
And I especially wanted to participate in an internet forum that was heavily moderated and had rules against "LOL FIRST POST BUMPIN' DIS THREAD HAMSTER PANCAKE HAT LOL".
You're joking right?  SA forums are a cesspool of rampant insults and attacks on anyone and everyone that has ever been noticed in any way (gaming, forums, news).  In fact the only people that ever show any sense of morality, resposibility or even just the slightest sense of "Hey, maybe we shouldn't be COMPLETE fuckwads to everyone all the time." get attacked and rage-hate-spewed on until they either leave or give up.  Case in point that YLCA guy you guys all jumped on and harrangued for posting "Perhaps we shouldn't compete for biggest asshole on the internet ALL the time and we wouldn't be hated so much?"

NO!  RABBLE RABBLE, VILE, VOMIT, RAGE, FOAM, SPEW, ATTTTTAAAAACK!

It's sad.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: chadz on July 15, 2011, 12:04:58 pm
I guess this will be locked soon. It really surves no other purpose than flaming between two clans, which, ironically enough, is the reason for this thread in the first place.

Stop the flaming.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Varric on July 15, 2011, 12:10:38 pm
Way to prove a point gais.

Everything that could have or needed to be said were already done on the first page, these extra 23 pages are just reposts and spam.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: rustyspoon on July 15, 2011, 12:33:11 pm
Just wanted to throw in before this gets locked...

I don't really have a problem with LLJK. Generally when they are being retarded, they are just doing it to each other on their own server. Most of the guys don't do anything wrong. I play on the LLJK server a lot and have never had a problem with anyone there.

Do I trust Zealot? No, because of what he did in the past. However, I think he deserves a chance anyway. Growing the community in any way is a good thing and I think having official servers would help with that. Also, Zealot would have to be a special kind of retard to pull anything at this point and I don't think he's that stupid. So hey, maybe he has seen the error of his ways and he's trying to do something good for a group he REALLY pissed off. Give him a chance.

You guys also need to stop raging at Ecko. He does what he does because he truly cares about the community. It's not because he wants to be supreme overlord of anything. He just wants to see the community grow. If he sees something that he thinks will hurt the community, he says something. And believe you me, even though we're in the same clan, we get a lot of shit from Ecko if we do something stupid. He's a good guy, so lay off.

No matter what anyone thinks though, this plan is moving forward. So how about we all relax and just see what happens?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Alex_C on July 15, 2011, 12:34:09 pm
Last I heard, NA players weren't going to be allowed to participate in Strategus at all.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: hotcobbler on July 15, 2011, 02:34:42 pm
I disagree that nothing of value has been said; rather, it has been glossed over, dismissed, and generally ignored in the 20+ pages of back and forth bickering and spin.

I've said it twice before in this thread, and only one other person has acknowledged it, so I feel the need to post it again (quoting myself):

Quote
The simplest way to end the controversy would be what I suggested earlier: Have a paypal account that goes to chadz, and HE pays for the server directly. Why limit financial input to one person, regardless of who they are? I would put up cash to help fund the new server if given a chance, and I'm sure others would too.

Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 02:39:20 pm
I disagree that nothing of value has been said; rather, it has been glossed over, dismissed, and generally ignored in the 20+ pages of back and forth bickering and spin.

I've said it twice before in this thread, and only one other person has acknowledged it, so I feel the need to post it again (quoting myself):

<Zealot__> I'm not donating money as it is, I'm donating a server. I'm on billing to handle bandwidth overtures, freak payments, and any other bills that come to me and are responsible to me.

The reason why this thread is trash, is because it's turned into two clans flaming each other and bickering, sometimes not even arguing about the merits of me giving my money to a server provider. Whatever logical point you tried to convey, the thread turned into a flame war between ATS and co. and LLJK.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 15, 2011, 02:45:22 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Why do I feel like she wants to put that finger in my butt
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 02:47:10 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 04:52:22 pm
I guess this will be locked soon. It really surves no other purpose than flaming between two clans, which, ironically enough, is the reason for this thread in the first place.

Stop the flaming.

Or we could leave it open and just rename the thread "Mosh Pit." I like this thread because I am no longer seeing any of the He-said She-said stuff spill over into other threads like it has been this last month or two, as it looks like they are focusing all of their efforts into just dirtying this one thread (for the most part). Kinda leaves the rest of the forums nice and shiny.

Locking this thread will just make them go back to the rest of the forums and start leaving dirt everywhere and creating new threads as usual. :/

Though then again, maybe this is a job for the Intercontinental Moderator Team!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Blondin on July 15, 2011, 04:53:44 pm
This thread give a crapy pattern of NA community.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Delro on July 15, 2011, 05:02:07 pm
Or we could leave it open and just rename the thread "Mosh Pit." I like this thread because I am no longer seeing any of the He-said She-said stuff spill over into other threads like it has been this last month or two, as it looks like they are focusing all of their efforts into just dirtying this one thread (for the most part). Kinda leaves the rest of the forums nice and shiny.

Locking this thread will just make them go back to the rest of the forums and start leaving dirt everywhere and creating new threads as usual. :/

Though then again, maybe this is a job for the Intercontinental Moderator Team!

Agreed- this thread is kind of like Hamsterdam, from Season 3 of The Wire
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Earthdforce on July 15, 2011, 05:08:08 pm
Wow, I'm sort of late to this thread (I haven't read it all, so sorry if I repeat someone else) ...but yeah, I'm guessing Ecko would know the NA community better than Shik, right? I mean, I've seen Ecko wayyy more than I've seen Shik, unless he's been hiding under other names, and as he said, he has been running the main servers for North America. I'm sure it's been suggested, but what if Ecko owned the servers with chadz still having all the power? I'm sure people will help fund this server regardless of who owns it (I know I will), but it's sort of like giving Ecko the middle finger if someone we admins have had problems with is the one donating the server.

Or..how about we make the current NA servers (Ecko's) official, and we get an entirely new box for the Strategus server (I don't believe the owner of just the strat server is as important of the official servers)? Hell, you can even repick the admins if you feel it's necessary chadz. Wouldn't everyone win that way?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on July 15, 2011, 05:39:08 pm
I know a great name for this thread...

NA strategus I wanna make a huge flame war.
Also cars!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: KaMiKaZe_JoE on July 15, 2011, 05:48:18 pm
Nothing to see here, keep moving folks...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 15, 2011, 06:24:18 pm
Its disappointing this turned into an ATS vs LLJK fight....i singled out Zealot, not all of LLJK. But i should have guessed that rather then look at the facts, things gotta get blurred with everything else.


chadz if you can guarantee he'll have 0 control over the server, and 0 access. Hell i'll support it. I think its dumb if you don't.


Still, just because he doesn't have access to ftp or files, or anything else, doesn't mean he can't hit the power switch. What i'm concerned about, is when he gets bored he's gonna leave in the trollish way possible.

Even my servers don't have one money provider. We get a lot from the NA community, and some private spenders.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 06:26:36 pm
I have infinite money.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IUSZyjiYuY)
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Toffi on July 15, 2011, 06:33:50 pm
This thread give a crapy pattern of NA community.

Now I got a good impression of the NA community. 25 pages...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lordark on July 15, 2011, 08:10:16 pm
Its chadz game. We are but at his mercy. Forgive us chadz the L.ordly L.egit J.ust K.ing!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gheritarish le Loki on July 15, 2011, 08:32:15 pm
Ats and others are pathetics trying to defend their interest....

How will you win a strat battle now if you can´t ban from server your enemy...? Lol

You are pathecics you come with argument against lljk but lljk is not the problem, you are the problem and you made to much biased bs.

This is only justice for na community.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 08:33:16 pm
I think we should ban all of NA from strat.

Less potential bias right there.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 09:05:51 pm
Its disappointing this turned into an ATS vs LLJK fight....i singled out Zealot, not all of LLJK. But i should have guessed that rather then look at the facts, things gotta get blurred with everything else.

This is very Ironic. All that this thread has become is because of the way it started, with you posting a poll you knew was factually incorrect and misrepresented the truth. It might have dried up and life continued, had you not used your server admin powers to spread out and stir the flames by asking people to come here and defend you and vote for you. You even put up a message on your website to "VOTE OR DIE". You say it is disappointing how this thread turned out? What did you expect. You shouldn't have started this thread in the first place.

I'm not angry that your thread has turned into a large excuse to attack me and my clan-mates, despite how we actually are in game. I am angry because you started this thread with the intention of trying to deny the whole community the benefits of a cost free and impartial, Offical server, that would run amazingly and have a good central location for NA. Just because you wanted to run the show instead of chadz. You're only using Zealot as leverage to get people riled up and angry. In reality, Zealot is just being generous, and this is really a fight between you and chadz.

I suggest that you take the "fight" where it belongs, out of these forums, if it really even belongs anywhere, instead of stirring up and infecting the community like this.

Edit: lock this thread, it should have been locked a long time ago.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 09:06:34 pm
When is this going to get locked?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Topsnus on July 15, 2011, 09:38:55 pm
Honestly, with every post Ecko makes he looks more and more like a power hungry, whiny, asshole. And i lose respect for him with every one of those posts. Currently he's around -50 or so.

Also, chances are that Ecko doesn't want these servers from chadz because it would mean his bans mean alot less. In the past he has used server bans to be an asshole, either because it was someone he didn't like, or they posted something on the forums. Because he owns nearly all the populated NA servers, his bans could end an NA players ability to play the mod. Quite a few of his bans had nothing to do with in game behavior, therefore such people would not be banned on official servers.

He could also be angry because he realizes that as soon as there are servers in NA with impartial and fair admins, nobody will go to ATS servers anymore.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: EyeBeat on July 15, 2011, 09:39:26 pm
When is this going to get locked?

Ecko will probably lock it himself after he realizes he is making himself look more and more like a jackass.  At least that is what he does on his other threads.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


In the past he has used server bans to be an asshole, either because it was someone he didn't like, or they posted something on the forums. Because he owns nearly all the populated NA servers, his bans could end an NA players ability to play the mod. Quite a few of his bans had nothing to do with in game behavior, therefore such people would not be banned on official servers.

He could also be angry because he realizes that as soon as there are servers in NA with impartial and fair admins, nobody will go to ATS servers anymore.

This is what it really comes down too.  You hit the head of the nail.  Apparently I was told by some of my fellow clanmates that Ecko came on our TS server to yell at me and ask me if I wanted to be banned for replying to his "Feel sorry for me poll" here http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,5391.msg94290.html#msg94290 

This was after I supported him and I said I didn't want him to close the servers just fix your admin problems and everything will be alright. 

Constructive criticism just gets ignored by Ecko because he just rages instead of listening to what you might have to say.  He does not acknowledge problems or apologizes for mistakes.  He just acts like they never happened and gets upset they they get brought up again.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Heroin on July 15, 2011, 10:32:51 pm
Ok, after reading 20 pages of this, I need to chime in. People on one side of the fence are not fully explaining their argument, and the people on the other side are assuming the best. Let me lay out for you the worst case scenario:

Zealot isn't really paying for a server, but rather has a job in which he can basically run a server with little to no additional cost to himself. He hosts the server box in his house somewhere. This "server", for anyone not familiar with modern technology, is simply a computer in his house that he will keep solely dedicated to hosting cRPG.

What this means, is that he will have physical access to the machine that not only hosts our game, but also has all of our CD key and personal IP information on it. Even if he does not have "admin" on the server, he has direct access to the files. This means that he doesn't NEED admin to screw with the server, steal CD keys, or generally cause chaos.

He will also have direct access to be able to shut down the server to influence strat battles. And NO, I don't necessarily think chadz will do anything about it, because if Zealot DID do such things to influence outcomes, he'd no doubt claim that there was a power outage or some other reasonable excuse for what happened.

Zealot showed that he is willing to be a terrorist to the NA crpg community by illegitimately obtaining a password from someone, then using it to harm other people's enjoyment of the game. Is this the person you want in charge of even a power cord that he can plug in or unplug at his pleasure? Of course not.

And as far as LLJK in general is concerned, they have started to take things too far lately. They have recently started doing personal searches on the people behind the characters, looking for criminal records or any other dirt they could use to directly attack people's lives. I promise you, you do not want ANY of your personal information in their hands.

Most people who are supporting Zealot are vocally doing so with the understanding that he will NOT have the control or access outlined above, which is to say, "Have the server be physically accessible to him". If this is truly not the case, and there is a guarantee that he will not have physical access to the server, and therefore no access to information, why don't you, chadz, make that statement. You DO owe it to the community to let them know, not because of anything to do with the game, but because you are endorsing someone from a group KNOWN to attack people's personal lives, with personal information, and suggesting that we possibly give them a way to OBTAIN such information.

I am fairly sure I know why chadz has not said that yet. He hasn't said it because it is not the case, and he recognizes the possibility that Zealot CAN potentially do harm in the situation he'd be in.

I support an official NA server. I support an NA server run by the dev team. I even support Zealot paying for it. But I DO NOT support him paying for it directly, or hosting it in his home. If Zealot is going to do this, let him do it by giving the money to chadz, and letting chadz put the server in his name.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I am not interested in LLJK having access to my personal information/CD keys/etc.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Gheritarish le Loki on July 15, 2011, 10:39:41 pm
are you dumb?
Its not run by lljk its run by shik which is in official dev team...
As i said false argument on lljk but the problem is stupid mind ats.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: ManOfWar on July 15, 2011, 10:40:32 pm
Where did you learn this?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 10:40:53 pm
are you dumb?
Its not run by lljk its run by shik which is in official dev team...
As i said false argument on lljk but the problem is stupid mind ats.

I would suggest remedial reading comprehension classes for you.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Heroin on July 15, 2011, 10:51:38 pm
Where did you learn this?

Are you talking to me? And if so, what, specifically, are you asking about?

If you're referring to my mention of the possibility of him hosting it in his home, my answer is simple. I haven't. No one has said WHERE the server will be hosted, and that's my point. With him providing the server, we have no idea where it will be. But if the server is in his name, regardless of whether or not it's in his home, he will be able to get physical access to it. That is simply the way it works when you pay for a server in your name.

are you dumb?
Its not run by lljk its run by shik which is in official dev team...
As i said false argument on lljk but the problem is stupid mind ats.

If the server is going to be in Shik or chadz name, and Zealot will not have his name on anything, nor physical access to the server, then GREAT! Let them come out and say that. They haven't as of yet, and I suspect that they have not diffused that fear because that fear is the reality that we are currently living in.

I'm starting to feel like a broken record, because I feel like I've already said this just one post ago. Please learn to read.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rikthor on July 15, 2011, 11:01:19 pm
words

What this means, is that he will have physical access to the machine that not only hosts our game, but also has all of our CD key and personal IP information on it. Even if he does not have "admin" on the server, he has direct access to the files. This means that he doesn't NEED admin to screw with the server, steal CD keys, or generally cause chaos.

words

You absolutely can not be this dumb? I mean, just damn. With a clan that has Native_ATS and use to have Gorath, this is the stupidest thing I have seen in this thread. That says a lot.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 11:02:52 pm
you don't think someone could put a data sniffer on a server hardware or could access files if they could access the physical copy of their hard drive? Because if so, please mail me your hard drive  :lol:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Rikthor on July 15, 2011, 11:04:12 pm
you don't think someone could put a data sniffer on a server hardware or could access files if they could access the physical copy of their hard drive? Because if so, please mail me your hard drive  :lol:

More like Heroin_ATS, the omnipotent, thinks the server will be in Zealot's house. You know, next to his cat, and his anime collection.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 11:06:43 pm
Regardless if the server is in Zealot's house or not (which to my knowledge, it would not be) he would have access to the server itself. Even if he does not have admin on the c-rpg server files, there is significant room for abuse because he has ownership and administrative rights of the physical server hardware.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: EyeBeat on July 15, 2011, 11:13:07 pm
Regardless if the server is in Zealot's house or not (which to my knowledge, it would not be) he would have access to the server itself. Even if he does not have admin on the c-rpg server files, there is significant room for abuse because he has ownership and administrative rights of the physical server hardware.

I do not care if Zealot can physically put his dick inside of the servers power supply.  The shit you and heroin are spewing isn't going to change chadz's decision.  Live with it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damug on July 15, 2011, 11:23:00 pm
Regardless if the server is in Zealot's house or not (which to my knowledge, it would not be) he would have access to the server itself. Even if he does not have admin on the c-rpg server files, there is significant room for abuse because he has ownership and administrative rights of the physical server hardware.
If we're going down this road what's to stop chadz, or ecko or anyone else from taking your ip address calling your isp, finding your home address and sending you anthrax in the mail.  Just because it's something that could in some bizarro world happen, doesn't mean it's necessarily within the realm of possibility.

In short, I respectfully disagree.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 11:29:49 pm
If we're going down this road what's to stop chadz, or ecko or anyone else from taking your ip address calling your isp, finding your home address and sending you anthrax in the mail.  Just because it's something that could in some bizarro world happen, doesn't mean it's necessarily within the realm of possibility.

In short, I respectfully disagree.

Ecko has a long history of hosting a stable running server and has been more than fair to everyone who played by the rules. Zealot just a few weeks ago hijacked a server to ban and troll everyone online. That lies the difference.

Besides, ISPs don't release your home address unless a court warrant is involved  :wink:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 11:35:39 pm
Zealot just a few weeks ago hijacked a server to ban and troll everyone online.

My fiancee did it.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 15, 2011, 11:38:43 pm
My god, the crap people are spewing in this thread. Some of you must be wearing tin foil hats right now. ZEALOT WILL HAVE ALL OUR DENTAL RECORDS IF WE DO THIS! OH GOD!

Why isn't this thread locked yet? It was a stupid thread created to stir people up and spread missinformation and it's continued existance is pointless. chadz made an official decison, and Ecko being butthurt that chadz is in control and not him wont change anything.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damug on July 15, 2011, 11:42:00 pm
Ecko has a long history of hosting a stable running server and has been more than fair to everyone who played by the rules.
If by stable you mean bogged down with ridiculous lag, and fair to everyone you mean everyone who is a sycophant to him then I agree wholeheartedly.
Quote
Zealot just a few weeks ago hijacked a server to ban and troll everyone online. That lies the difference.
Hijacked? All he did was a prank that took less than 5 minutes to reverse because ecko had an incompetent administration team that leaked the admin password.
Quote
Besides, ISPs don't release your home address unless a court warrant is involved  :wink:
I thought we were throwing out crazy instances that would never happen.  ISPs aren't going to release your password, but there is no legal obligation for them not to.  Maybe someone at the ISP makes a mistake and releases it to them.  Either way, it's neither here nor there because none of the situations anyone is concerned about are going to happen.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Haru_Takeda on July 15, 2011, 11:43:48 pm
I have a suggestion, why not Ecko set the server up and chadz/Dev team have full control over it.
Because if you cannot agree to that, this is purely a power struggle.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 11:47:25 pm
If by stable you mean bogged down with ridiculous lag, and fair to everyone you mean everyone who is a sycophant to him then I agree wholeheartedly.Hijacked? All he did was a prank that took less than 5 minutes to reverse because ecko had an incompetent administration team that leaked the admin password.I thought we were throwing out crazy instances that would never happen.  ISPs aren't going to release your password, but there is no legal obligation for them not to.  Maybe someone at the ISP makes a mistake and releases it to them.  Either way, it's neither here nor there because none of the situations anyone is concerned about are going to happen.

A) Not bogged down with lag
B) Yes hijacked. Many people were unable to play for hours because of what he did. It was not a very good show of character, and it does show malicious intent
C) They actually are liable. Invasion of privacy, potential risk, etc. etc. Many legal rules and confidentiality laws which would be violated, but hey thats off topic.


I have a suggestion, why not Ecko set the server up and chadz/Dev team have full control over it.
Because if you cannot agree to that, this is purely a power struggle.

Its been suggested many times. chadz/LLJK oppose it vehemently for some reason. The vast majority of people who oppose Zealot owning the server simply want a more reputable character to be the owner of the server.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: nuffen on July 15, 2011, 11:51:46 pm
Its been suggested many times. chadz/LLJK oppose it vehemently for some reason.

Really? chadz/LLJK?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 11:52:12 pm
I'm sorry, I've refrained from posting [seriously] in this thread for neutrality reasons, etc.

But Seawied, you have to be trolling, no one is this fucking stupid, unless you're actually mentally handicapped. No one. Can be. This fucking retarded. Unless you're an actual retard, in which case, sorry buddy, never stop posting. By the way, I'm not being sarcastic in order to provide an insult, I legitimately think you're trolling or handicapped in some mental way.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 15, 2011, 11:55:37 pm
WHO CARES THIS IS ALL OLD NEWS...

The new drama is...

chadz cheated and gave Fallen a village from favoritism!  :mrgreen:

And if that rumor does not take hold then I can start a better one...
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 15, 2011, 11:56:26 pm
I'm in a furious love making affair with damug, this is just a rumor though.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 15, 2011, 11:58:49 pm
Zealot, are you really stupid enough to see how people might not trust you after the shenanigans you pulled? Really?

You're a known troll. Not a "I TROLL YOU/Stupid post" troll, but someone who legitimately went out of their way to try to ruin the game for other people.

SURPRISE! People don't like you, Zealot. Wonder how that happened.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Cheap_Shot on July 16, 2011, 12:00:38 am
Seriously. This thread has gone on long enough. Everyone is ignoring every fact presented and saying the same things over and over for pages and pages, and it's not going to end unless either Ecko accepts that this thread was a bad idea and closes it, or a forums admin or chadz puts a stop to it. No one knows what they are talking about, and it has devolved into paranoid "WHAT IF?" agruments and off topic clan fueding. An official decision has already been made.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 16, 2011, 12:01:38 am
Apparently I've confused you, I'm sorry for that.

Anyway, moving back out of this thread, no idea why it's not locked.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: ManOfWar on July 16, 2011, 12:04:29 am
What The FUCK

Herion not knowing anything says that the server will be in zealots house and can be accessed by him.(by access I mean personal info or whatever shit that can be harmful)

Then some other people say that it will not be in his house and it can still be accessed by him.

Then others are saying its neither in his house nor can it be accessed by him

So who the hell is right, I am utterly confused- Can a Developer clarify this and then lock the god damned thread?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 16, 2011, 12:08:33 am
Really? chadz/LLJK?

Both chadz and LLJK members have vehemently opposed having someone else hos the NA strategus server, regardless of the admining rights on it.


@ManofWar: According to the Devs, Zealot will own the server. This means the system won't be setup in the fashion which myself and many others would favor of Zealot donating to the dev team and having the dev team own the server.

Zealot will not be on the Warband C-RPG in-game admin list

Because he owns the server and has the server billed in his name, Zealot would have the computer's administrative rights, allowing him to install other programs on the server and access to the server files.

The in-game Warband C-RPG admin list will be comprised of Shik and some of the dev's choice.



Does that clarify things?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Secret Agent Cow on July 16, 2011, 12:08:42 am
Zealot lives in Canada. The server is in Texas*.

*Nevermind, from reading zealot's post it is under consideration at this point.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Topsnus on July 16, 2011, 12:10:14 am
It won't be accessed by him. Nearly every person who says that "everyone doesn't like this idea" is in ATS. The fact is that ALOT of people like this idea because ALOT of people are sick and tired of Ecko and his incompetence. Please just make the new servers.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 16, 2011, 12:13:59 am
It won't be accessed by him. Nearly every person who says that "everyone doesn't like this idea" is in ATS. The fact is that ALOT of people like this idea because ALOT of people are sick and tired of Ecko and his incompetence. Please just make the new servers.

nearly 200 people have voted against Zealot owning the server. ATS doesn't have nearly those numbers. Maybe someone doesn't like Ecko for whatever their reasons might be. This isn't about Ecko. This is about having a well known troll own the only NA strategus server. 99% of the people would not mind the change if a dev-picked admin team official NA strategus server was owned by someone other than Zealot.

TL;DR most people simply want a more reputable person to own the server. Its not an unreasonable request.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Topsnus on July 16, 2011, 12:18:10 am
nearly 200 people have voted against Zealot owning the server. ATS doesn't have nearly those numbers. Maybe someone doesn't like Ecko for whatever their reasons might be. This isn't about Ecko. This is about having a well known troll own the only NA strategus server. 99% of the people would not mind the change if a dev-picked admin team official NA strategus server was owned by someone other than Zealot.

TL;DR most people simply want a more reputable person to own the server. Its not an unreasonable request.
You're kidding right? You are going to use that poll? That poll is completely biased and immature. A perfect example of why Ecko should have absolutely nothing to do with server ownership and management. That poll is not there to get the actual feelings of the community. That poll is there to give the answer that Ecko wants. The fact that you referred back to it is kind of pathetic in itself.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: LLJK on July 16, 2011, 12:18:44 am
pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopppppppppp0

i will own the new server anussmasher for prez
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Classical on July 16, 2011, 12:22:19 am
Zealot lives in Canada. The server is in Texas*.

*Nevermind, from reading zealot's post it is under consideration at this point.

Are you questioning my certified Canadian citizenship? Let me prove it to you: zed.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Seawied on July 16, 2011, 12:22:33 am
TL;DR most people simply want a more reputable person to own the server. Its not an unreasonable request.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Topsnus on July 16, 2011, 12:24:26 am
WHO IS THIS MOST PEOPLE? BECAUSE FROM WHAT I HAVE SEEN EVEN WITH YOUR BIASED POLL AND ENTIRE CLAN VOTING FOR ECKO YOU CAN STILL ONLY MANAGE A 60-40 LEAD!!!
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Bulzur on July 16, 2011, 12:38:52 am
Don't mind the poll, some EU people voted 1 for the drama.  :rolleyes:
Others voted 2 for the drama. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Damug on July 16, 2011, 12:40:54 am
To fuel the fire a bit: there are 150,000 lljk, even less than .1% of them trust him.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Lordark on July 16, 2011, 12:47:12 am
LLJK EYEBEATWOMEN I love your sig with the thrower blowing up a heli.

Where can I get that shit?
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: CtrlAltDe1337 on July 16, 2011, 01:57:31 am
Ats and others are pathetics trying to defend their interest....

How will you win a strat battle now if you can´t ban from server your enemy...? Lol

You are pathecics you come with argument against lljk but lljk is not the problem, you are the problem and you made to much biased bs.

This is only justice for na community.
I hope this is a troll post, otherwise, I'll lol and facepalm.
Title: Re: NA Strategus Server Poll
Post by: Ecko on July 16, 2011, 02:23:28 am
Well the points been made. i didn't really bother reading the 28 pages to respond to everyone, but i'll say it one last time:

I support having an official server not run by me. I do not support giving any sort of control/responsibility (even if it is managed by shik and the dev team) to zealot. Balton would be a better choice. I prefer having multiple people donating so if one person decides to skip town, there's a chance to keep the server up.

If i'm wrong( I hope i am) the community grows. If i'm right, we're back to no server when we'll probably need one.


This wasn't about protecting my interests...if i wanted to ban every single guild who did something bad towards me...half the NA community would be banned. Not only that, but over half the guilds out there have at least one admin on my admin staff or knows someone who can represent them.

At the end of the day, this means less work for me which i can be happy about. What made me unhappy was the way this was handled. chadz you disconnected a perfectly good NA strat sever before you brought up a new one (even if this strat don't count, less fun for us right?). Plus you took a service that many have offered without doing your homework on the person who offered. Instead you recognized a problem, and got half way there to solving it.

Your the creator chadz, and its a free game that lots take for granted (even myself at times); i just don't see these types of actions with EU. Ever.