There is little chance of victory and good fights with mass cav and byz + mercs stacking 10 plus players each :-D fighting against a byz mob stacked with long spears brings joy to no one, siege has fewcav and you actually get to fight 1 vs 2, 1 vs 1, 2 vs 3 etc rather than 2 vs 10 :-P. Even eu4 had more than eu1 last night
Nah siege has clan stack :-D im not saying your doing wrong just reasons why eu2 is more full, alsoa big strat battle kills eu1 for a few hours :-Dthere is no battle for 2 hours but still same
So you are saying we should go to siege, bully everyone out of their mp there and save eu1 at the cost of eu2? :mrgreen:Trying to be something special instead of massive random recruit would be something... old Mercs were special... nowadays... oh well...
Adrenaline shot now!Too late, it's dead already! Requiescat in pace Eu1!
Charge to 1000 volt, release!
There is little chance of victory and good fights with mass cav and byz + mercs stacking 10 plus players each :-D fighting against a byz mob stacked with long spears brings joy to no one, siege has fewcav and you actually get to fight 1 vs 2, 1 vs 1, 2 vs 3 etc rather than 2 vs 10 :-P. Even eu4 had more than eu1 last night
"well maybe devs should give more exp (like eu5) on battle servers "well maybe devs should give more exp (like eu5) on battle servers > or change the fighting.systems and mechanic like that to motivate more people ...
There is little chance of victory and good fights with mass cav and byz + mercs stacking 10 plus players each :-D fighting against a byz mob stacked with long spears brings joy to no one, siege has fewcav and you actually get to fight 1 vs 2, 1 vs 1, 2 vs 3 etc rather than 2 vs 10 :-P. Even eu4 had more than eu1 last night
There is not much players these days. Lots of new games are out ...
I cant remember when eu2 was 80/80 (need to wait to enter) or eu1 over 100/200.
Right now (Saturday Evening):
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Ok. not very crowded, but you can still play.
I hope the developers come out with something new that will attract more players.
There is little chance of victory and good fights with mass cav and byz + mercs stacking 10 plus players each :-D fighting against a byz mob stacked with long spears brings joy to no one, siege has fewcav and you actually get to fight 1 vs 2, 1 vs 1, 2 vs 3 etc rather than 2 vs 10 :-P. Even eu4 had more than eu1 last nightwhat if i told you that i am byz and i have moust of the time x1?
Lol at Mlekce.
Anyway, i really miss good old days when we spammed join button to get in to fully crowded eu1 server.
You also wanted to have 2h buff,cav nerf and archery buff,well you got it,now mod is duying i hope you are all happy.It seems after last patch Eu1 got hit pretty badly and lost most of the players. Nerfing cav and archers was supposed to be solution of problems and instead of that became deadly blow for Eu1. Not sure whom I should blame, but well done, well done :rolleyes:
sooooooooooooooo nerf cav
It seems after last patch Eu1 got hit pretty badly and lost most of the players. Nerfing cav and archers was supposed to be solution of problems and instead of that became deadly blow for Eu1. Not sure whom I should blame, but well done, well done :rolleyes:
just again double xp on eu 1 and we all have fun :D
funnily enough most players on eu1 are cav/archers/xbows :mrgreen:Well, last time I was in battle when last patch was released. Since that date everytime I join cRPG Eu1 has less than 60 players and I don't like small battles, because
crowded server = fun = getting more crowded = more funand "emptier" server = less fun. Before patch battle, archers&cav were ok in my opinion. Dunno why did they nerf them.
when i told some 1h swords should be buffed i got -7 votes instantly so i hope you are all happy because i don't want to play mod where if you play as 2h you get everything. Enjoy ur 101 speed and 41 cut katana,enjoy because mod will die soon and you will play alone with ur shitty OP swords.Buff, nerf, buff, nerf... what a shit. What's funny no-one asked for buff for 2h swords and even 2hrs agree that buffing most of the swords weren't necessary. Longsword, HBS, axes, miaodao and the rest of 2h were perfectly fine, so I have no idea why did they buff them, they could have nerf danish and leave the rest in peace :rolleyes: Original nerf for archers also was amazing :rolleyes:
the devs listening to them,Heh, but when almost everyone says turn nerf was shit they don't listen. Noone asked for buffing 2h, but they did... :rolleyes:
it's just that almost everyone including me plays this game like a fucking pussy. Backpedaling, running away, dirty tricks everywhere.Ye, that's why I stopped playing my agi 2her and made 1h alt, didn't want to be a pussy any longer :wink:
We need new animations, new tricks,Keep dreaming....
Banning everyone who is a clan member? :D
Buff, nerf, buff, nerf... what a shit. What's funny no-one asked for buff for 2h swords and even 2hrs agree that buffing most of the swords weren't necessary. Longsword, HBS, axes, miaodao and the rest of 2h were perfectly fine, so I have no idea why did they buff them, they could have nerf danish and leave the rest in peace :rolleyes: Original nerf for archers also was amazing :rolleyes:
And you Mlekce, asking for buff for weapon which you use, are just another whining bitch. You deserved every single - which you got. 1h are fine, don't touch them.
Just because you use some of bundle of sticks 1h weapons and have build 32lvl + it doesn't mean everything is fine.Actually my 1h alt just reached lvl 29 (I made respec a few times in the meantime) and I have used military pick, warhammer, nordic champ sword, grosse messere, military cleaver - according to you all of them are "bundle of sticks weapons"? :rolleyes:
don't fucking tell me it is fine.It is fine.
it is not that hard to play and have dicent scoreIf it is not hard to play why do you think 1h needs buff? It doesn't make sense. And if your swings glance with nordic your doing it wrong. As I'm mediocre player I blame myself for my poor performance, not others. Maybe you should try to do the same.
i am playing 1h for 6 gens and have mw weapons,shield and shit don't fucking tell me it is fine.
Yeah it is not that hard to play and have dicent score,but you should not be spammed by katana,longsword,danish gs user every time without possibility to attack once.
not to mention stab bounces and mw nordic champion sword swing glances on heavy armor.
i am playing 1h for 6 gens and have mw weapons,shield and shit don't fucking tell me it is fine.
Yeah it is not that hard to play and have dicent score,but you should not be spammed by katana,longsword,danish gs user every time without possibility to attack once.
not to mention stab bounces and mw nordic champion sword swing glances on heavy armor.
Actually my 1h alt just reached lvl 29 (I made respec a few times in the meantime) and I have used military pick, warhammer, nordic champ sword, grosse messere, military cleaver - according to you all of them are "bundle of sticks weapons"? :rolleyes:
Make 18/21 2h/polearm build and dominate vs every class out there.
(click to show/hide)
Ppl make one char play for one gen and make 21/15 build and then they think 1h are awsome because they live longer then when they were other class.and what that even change??
But when you start your 2nd or 3rd gen you see how 1h is actually hard and sometimes shit.
shielder vs 2-3 archers = dead,shielder vs polearmer with axe = dead, shielder vs 27 agi katana user = moust of the time dead unless katana guy is noob,shielder vs great axe insta dead (that axe hit before you see it),shielder vs danish gs in plate = spammed...
Only good thing about shield is to support you teammates and steal their kills while being able to block multiple attacks and ranged projectiles.
if you make 21/15 build 18/21 shielder will kill you,if you make 18/21 you are too weak to kill tincan. Every build you take is shit and doesn't guarantee you victory vs other classes. Make 18/21 2h/polearm build and dominate vs every class out there.
shielder is eassymodeQuotenah I am just trolling youQuoteor may be not?Quoteshielder is easymode like all other classes when you are good at that
if you make 21/15 build 18/21 shielder will kill you,if you make 18/21 you are too weak to kill tincan. Every build you take is shit and doesn't guarantee you victory vs other classes. Make 18/21 2h/polearm build and dominate vs every class out there.
There is a big Autumn steam sale right now and people have gone try new games, which is normal.Eu1 was in this state for the last 2 maybe 3 months?
Just fix the fucking disconection problem that kill eu1, and mod is rolling againYou sir are damn right :!:
well maybe devs should give more exp (like eu5) on battle servers > or change the fighting.systems and mechanic like that to motivate more people ...
. People will use and abuse the shit out of games and mechanics if you let them. And this mod sure is making it possible.
I have played crpg for 1.5 year now. I have spent 99% of that time on EU2.Well, people like you don't like battle, that is ok. But how the fuck you come to think that everybody is like you? Believe me, there are enough people that like battle exactly because there is no respawn and no forced goal like some flags or what.
Why?
Well i dont care much for waiting several minutes to respawn.
I dont like being oneshot by lance cav, or bumpslashed by cav, or kited and shot to pieces by HA, HX.
I dont like being shot to shit by big groups of ranged and no cover to speak of that i can hide behind.
I dont enjoy the kind of cowardly gameplay that battle encourage, stay alive long enough and your team wins HURRAY.
Siege offers fast and constant action, action with a purpose (take flag, defend flag, open doors, close doors)
If i get shot or couched or ganked by a group of players i can respawn and either try to backstab them in turn, or i can do something else.
If battle had some sort of purpose other than camping "better" than the other team it might catch my interest a bit more. Master of the field flags spawning or something.
But i would have to play with a shield and a spear just to survive against all the fucking cav and ranged.
I want 4 attack directions. I want manual blocking. Anything else is just lackluster
So in short, fuck battle, its always been the shittiest gamemode. Finally people are beginning to realize that. Grats,
People said that numbers where low and blamed it on archers. Archers got nerfed again, so now what?
still archers :D
while(popTooLow())
{
nerfArchers();
}
too much ranged and cav. imo thats why its dying...
**hides under the table before his head comes off**
What am I to make of that? You've always supported that code, and it clearly doesn't work.
Remove looms and level, just keep the character skill modifier then maybe new people will come to this mod.
Solutions? Get more new players into the game, and have them stick around long enough to learn the basics by not putting them in impossible situations for the first few hours. Make the first character from a new account level 20 or so, then start the retirement at lvl 1. Give new players free untradable looms (or nerf looms in general). Give new players an idea of what to do with skill points/stats rather than just plopping them into the game with no clue. Force them to make a character on the website before even logging into the game, with ideas for builds on the site (start char templates, that start the guy at lvl 20 or something in a chosen class). I think at this point its about getting new players, since the old school will leave anyway, and people can only get sick of aspects of at a game so much before moving on
......
But also Blanket ban of those Eastern Europeans (Deserved in my eyes), but still cuts the community down by a significant margin.
.......
Americas army had great system. Does any1 remember it?
Based on your score last map, you chose your position in team. so, if youre first on scoreboard, next map you choose first and you can apply for comander of team and etc..
I'm sure that some will know to explain it much better.
Tl;dr: Old McDonald had a farm.
Remove looms and level, just keep the character skill modifier then maybe new people will come to this mod.and you will have 3 players on eu 1 in prime time
16 years old kids cant lead armys ;-)
being top doesn't make you a good commander :P
We are patching cRPG... please stand bywho what what where?????
you can join the chat meanwhile: #mount&blade-crpg @ quakenet.org
Forum is up, if your login fails, wait for the crpg site to be back up.
Forum
gay
We are patching cRPG... please stand bychangelog from irc
<chadz> archers nerfed
<chadz> cav nerfed
<chadz> 2h buffed
<chadz> perma death
<chadz> looms reset
<chadz> more details coming soon
Well, people like you don't like battle, that is ok. But how the fuck you come to think that everybody is like you? Believe me, there are enough people that like battle exactly because there is no respawn and no forced goal like some flags or what.
For me siege is 10 times more boring, and I only play it here and there for some diversion and the lack of a TDM server (which would then be the variety from battle). If you're interested, I can tell you more detailed why I personally like battle and dislike siege, but I won't force my opinion on others and pretend it was the one truth in the world.
and btw., at all the other guys transferring their usual whining about this or that class onto this discussion: It's pathetic.
Well look at the date on the screen shot. Im sure the Euros where just celebrating thanksgiving and didnt have time to play CRPG.
Well look at the date on the screen shot. Im sure the Euros where just celebrating thanksgiving and didnt have time to play CRPG.
I stopped playing and EU1 died? Coincidence? :mrgreen:Yes! :P
Yes! :P
I stopped playing and EU1 died? Coincidence? :mrgreen:
Yes! :P
I feel important now \o/ \o/ \o/:shock:
I feel important now \o/ \o/ \o/
Perhaps it has been said on this thread, but 33 % of EU battle players are on EU4. Why create a second battle server ?
Everything would be fine if the disconnections would be fixed. Just last week there was around 80-90 playing and after one dc, only 20-30 came back to EU1.Ye, it's really annoying, on siege everyone have lost connection two times in last half hour. After first crash instead of 70 there was 45 players, after second I've quited.
.Anyway, i really miss good old days when we spammed join button to get in to fully crowded eu1 server.
14 people online on what use to be prime time. Dont think its ever gotten this bad before even with big releases like skyrim gw2 etc
Some radical ideas:
Introduce Hardcore mode. If you finish a map with negative K - D, your char dies permanently. Or some other criteria, but I think the chance of permadeath could be pretty interesting. True heroes would emerge. Imagine the stories how a peasant stabbed the community's favourite high level hero with a pitchfork.
Or maybe take Diablo 2 ladder mode as example and introduce separated cRPG society that is regularly wiped (all 3-6 months?), but has no upkeep and has exclusive access to some items.
I returned to Warband and brought two more friends.I have returned more than year ago and afer that haven't quitted, spent 2k+ hours in cRPG including no more than 10 hours as cav or archer. Ye, I think I did my part as well :wink:
I think I did my part 8-) :mrgreen:
(click to show/hide)
I still lobby for the frigging Deathmatch or Team-Deathmatch mode like in native.mh, I want TDM as well, but not exactly for the same reasons.
Much "faster" gameplay than battle due to instarespawn. This would keep me from getting distracted and ultimately quitting because I don't want to wait 3 Minutes until I can play again and visit websites in the meantime... It could fill the gap when you do not have the frustration-tolerance/concentration to proper play in battle-mode. Its not by chance that these modes are the most popular in Multiplayer-Gaming-history.
But I advocate this for a long time now with never even proper feedback from devs. I know I am not the only one with that wish though. The mighty chadzigkeit seems to have something against this mode... :/
mh, I want TDM as well, but not exactly for the same reasons.
In case you haven't noticed, wpf overhaul is 4 months late. Suggestions mean very little at this stage.True, I am still waiting for WPF increase.
Every year around this time, the mod dies... Every year.
It's like new games are coming out or old ones are on sale or something :rolleyes:
Continue on silly people, continue on.
I guess people are fed with devs of this mod being ignorant
Great chadz, make me Admin again and everything will be fine. I'd ban everyone, who is stupid, acts stupid or does stupid stuff and change the map everytime I die.
That's pretty much the only change the game needs!
Uhtred for President!
visitors can't see pics , please register or loginAnd now barely reaches 150:
EU_cRPG_1_New 46
EU_cRPG_2 58
EU_cRPG_3 4
EU_cRPG_4 21
EU_cRPG_5 8
EU_cRPG_6 6
EU_cRPG_7 16
I have the feeling many just want to see the mod dead. If only to proof they are right.
Great news! Big change for next patch. Rageball has air friction(FD~v^2) for the ball now. Mod saved.
Ignorant?
Would you please elaborate, because I think you're full of shit.
Ignorant?
Would you please elaborate, because I think you're full of shit.
Bad server, shit balance, nothing but ranged and cavalry. I think that about sums it up...
Am I playing a different game? Nothing but ranged and cavalry? YOU people are what 's killing the game.
Ok, so let's see what are u, a ranged class or a Horseman... :P
It feels glitchy for me, like attack registering at strange locations (nowhere near my attack). Player collision feels off too, like passing through enemies or enemies attacks going through blocks because they passed into your model
Am I playing a different game? Nothing but ranged and cavalry? YOU people are what 's killing the game.
as i can tell there are almost always still close to 100 on eu 1 in the evening and max on eu 2 plus around 50 or something on other servers thats over 220 online i dont feel the mod is dying at all im from eu so im not counting the na servers here, there might be around 20-30 less than before the multi account ban but hey we are better off without the cheaters right? so whats the problem really? i for sure can see it
Still wondering why in all of my time in c-RPG the crossbow spam has never been addressed...
Don't forget that there are pretty big differences to EU and NA when it comes to class/weapon/armor balance on servers.
Ok, so let's see what are u, a ranged class or a Horseman... :P
What I see is that boring scenario where 2 infantry masses fight each other until one side wins.
you see a very different view to me adamar. eu1 isn't melee focused at all its usually two blobs of melee hiding while being shot at by hoards of archers and cav :P
except last night for some reason ^^
I've played the mod for a long time, and I've never been annoyed by xbows. Maybe a damage reduction with wpf increasing damage or something to make sidearms less viable, but I don't think they're in any way broken...I've never had a problem with arbalests killing me in 2 bolts since archers kills me with 2 arrows.
1. dump strat. no offense , just honest opinion
4. more tournaments and scrims
Only archers with MW Longbow and MW Bodkins are able to kill in two arrows.Wrong.
Only archers with MW Longbow and MW Bodkins are able to kill in two arrows. Good thing there aren't many of them around, at least on EU side.
Wrong.
He's right, and he's actually played the class.I know I'm right and I know I've played the class.
imo :
1. dump strat. no offense , just honest opinion
2. invent a new mode for battle, there was a good idea posted in the suggestions forum
3. more good maps
4. more tournaments and scrims
5. more items and item balancing
6. new minor and major features like banner carriers , shield bash etc (mainly some cool coding and animation stuff)
7. profit
I don't think the mod is dying, it just so happens that a lot of new good games are coming out , especially planetside 2. It's always like this, just remember what was going on when Skyrim came out. Eventually people always come back to cRPG. Of course some encouragement for them to come back faster is always welcome .
Actually, I think I saw you on NA1 the other day with a Long Spear when EU1 was down. What was your impression of it, and did you notice any big differences from EU battle?There is a huge difference in average armor, NA does not armorcrutch like EU does. Ofcourse there is a few people that heavy armor, but the majority wear body armors that are around 40 base armor and I see very little heavy gloves. In EU the average body armor is 45 atleast with mostly heavy gloves. I think it might be as much as a 10 body armor difference on average, which quite changes the perception of damage of weapons and changes the cut/pierce balance around.
I play for three years,and for three years I have heard that the mod is dying,I do not think that will do for now;surely such titles as war of the roses and chivalry are direct competitors but are worse then wb CRPG and tired quickly. But remember with nostalgia the old xp system that made battagle more frantic and fun...cRPG only exists for two years and 4 months. Besides, dwindling player numbers are a cold hard fact. I think it is time to concentrate the community by removing some servers.
imo :
1. dump strat. no offense , just honest opinion
2. invent a new mode for battle, there was a good idea posted in the suggestions forum
3. more good maps
4. more tournaments and scrims
5. more items and item balancing
6. new minor and major features like banner carriers , shield bash etc (mainly some cool coding and animation stuff)
7. profit
I don't think the mod is dying, it just so happens that a lot of new good games are coming out , especially planetside 2. It's always like this, just remember what was going on when Skyrim came out. Eventually people always come back to cRPG. Of course some encouragement for them to come back faster is always welcome .
I remember that Fallen organised lots of tournaments in pass. Now theres Strat and no more tournament why? I think a big rageball tournament can bring some action/fun :P No-clan based everyone can create his own team/roster etc etc... Maybe a reward for the winner.
cRPG only exists for two years and 4 months. Besides, dwindling player numbers are a cold hard fact. I think it is time to concentrate the community by removing some servers.
Rhaegar, how about you come online to see for yourself what state cRPG is in currently?
I've been away from this game for 4 months and during those four months not a single bug has been fixed. EU4 is still night time all the time and that's only playable battle server atm.
Only worse thing than this is database reset along with servers being reseted. That would bring us back to early stages of cRPG development once again...
For last 2 days, my ping increased very much. I usually play with 80-90 ping on EU servers but for 2 days i always have 110-130. I don't have any ping problem in other games, just cRPG. And EU1 and EU2 not shown on the server list anymore. What's happening to cRPG ?
Is cRPG coming to end with world ?
21.12.2012 getting closer...............
I just want The Great August Patch. In my opinion the main problem is the slow levelsystem and the frustrating multipler.
There should also be more ways to play your character (overhead attacks for hoplites or a buff for halfswording).
so genius,practically only play on two servers in europe e1 e2, two different ways siege battle, we want to remove one of them?Nope, there are 6 servers for EU only, I would like to see EU_4 removed for starters.
(to clarify since you're so stubborn, 3 years is a way of saying the mod has had many ups and downs over time)Afaik, 3 years is a way of saying 3 years. As far as player numbers go, this is not a simple 'down', this is a steadily lowering amount of players. The total amount of EU has been significantly lower than the 250 there used to be during primetime. Which I don't mind, I like a small community, as long as it is not spread out over 6 servers.
Nope, there are 6 servers for EU only, I would like to see EU_4 removed for starters.
Afaik, 3 years is a way of saying 3 years. As far as player numbers go, this is not a simple 'down', this is a steadily lowering amount of players. The total amount of EU has been significantly lower than the 250 there used to be during primetime. Which I don't mind, I like a small community, as long as it is not spread out over 6 servers.
Pej got it right, a dev team that plays is a dev team that knows their mod. I would argue that there are a lot of people who know more about crpg than its creators, which isnt too good.
Fix server crashes, fix the map rotation and maybe find new candidates for the balance team. Think of it asStalin'sMuffin's 5 year plan... :)
Fixing those smaller things make a bigger impact than BIG NEW HARDCORE CHANGES that some people are asking for, because Ive played this mod since the very start. I got 1500 hours playtime and Im still not bored, and considering I never played a game for more than 10 hours before, that aint half bad.
Think about it devs.
Nope, there are 6 servers for EU only, I would like to see EU_4 removed for starters.Any reason for this besides you being sadistic and wanting more people to endure the horrid clanstacked 10+GK/Byz/SomethingElse teams?
I've been away from this game for 4 months and during those four months not a single bug has been fixed. EU4 is still night time all the time and that's only playable battle server atm.
edit 2: MAKE EVENTS A TOP LEVEL FORUM i made an interest check thread for a 2v2 tourney that got ~40 posts of interested people in 2-3 days and then when i posted an events thread, 12 posts in almost a monthThis is a very important point, the events section is obscure as fuck while events are the best thing in online gaming.
re: balance, i've been saying forever that the balance team needs to have people who actually play this game on it, the turnspeed nerf still being in game is a total validation of thatThat is somewhat of a poor example seeing as there are people (me included) who like the turnspeed nerf (it could use a few adjustments so it affects 100 or less length weapons slightly less, but besides that the nerf is fine), and odds are that before I got banned I played more than you.
before I got bannedAre you perma banned? :rolleyes:
Are you perma banned? :rolleyes:Nope.
Nope, there are 6 servers for EU only, I would like to see EU_4 removed for starters.
Afaik, 3 years is a way of saying 3 years. As far as player numbers go, this is not a simple 'down', this is a steadily lowering amount of players. The total amount of EU has been significantly lower than the 250 there used to be during primetime. Which I don't mind, I like a small community, as long as it is not spread out over 6 servers.
ahhh was awesome now 50+ ppl 2 in the morinign and then random disconnets... nooooooooooo
teeth what you seem to fail to grasp is that the people who usually play on eu4 DONT WANT TO BE ON EU1.EU_1 and EU_4 are exactly the same type of servers, how does it make sense to split a community with max 100 battle players over 2 servers? How is that better than having one, concentrated community? EU_4 is not a better server, it's just a certain type of players that plays there. As far as I know it mostly consists of lone wolves who can't deal with teamplay, and instead of having to learn to play, they can join the noob server and be lone wolves together there.
Not everyone wants to fight against mobs of infantry with pikes and lots of cav and archers. Eu4 is a nice server despite the dark because you see the same crowd online and you can have some nice relaxing fights.
You cant just say hmm not enough people play where i want to so force them!
lone wolves who can't deal with teamplay, and instead of having to learn to play, they can join the noob server and be lone wolves together there.Have to learn to play? Are u fucking kidding me? Since when cRPG is only for pro epeen whoring cocksuckers?
EU_1 and EU_4 are exactly the same type of servers, how does it make sense to split a community with max 100 battle players over 2 servers? How is that better than having one, concentrated community? EU_4 is not a better server, it's just a certain type of players that plays there. As far as I know it mostly consists of lone wolves who can't deal with teamplay, and instead of having to learn to play, they can join the noob server and be lone wolves together there.teeth, you are really onto some odd argumentation there. Having to learn to play? Are you serious?
teeth, you are really onto some odd argumentation there. Having to learn to play? Are you serious?When I say that they are the same type of servers I mean exactly that the servers are the same, not the players. The servers are different because EU_4 has different set of players indeed.
Also you say they are exactly the same type of servers, yet different types of players play there. Isn't that different enough, besides other maps?
By erasing EU_4 you would certainly do more harm than anything. And you want them lone noob wolves who can't deal with teamplay on EU_1? What if they don't learn to your satisfaction? I think you don't mean it in that sense, but still, removing EU_4 to force more players into EU_1 is a terrible idea.
so because they like to play the game in a different style to you that means they now need to be forced to fight your pike and team mates just so you have more people to kill?The game is what the game is. If I would like to play the game in a style that involves a flying carpet and a boomstick, that doesn't mean that it should be possible. Just answer me this, do you really want 2 seperate small communities of like 30 players each, instead of one big one?
The discussion was about EU_4 and EU_1, which are similar as far as server setup goes and why EU_4 should continue to exist if player numbers dwindle. Ofcourse EU_2 is a different matter and I get that there are players that prefer siege over battle.(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or loginLooool look what chadz did here!
well maybe devs should give more exp (like eu5) on battle servers > or change the fighting.systems and mechanic like that to motivate more people ...
You too are bad at teamplay if you're not on TS with bunch of clannies. You can't expect of random folks to show high levels of teamplay.Hah, I am able to pull of excellent teamwork without any communication with other good teamworkers.
Hah, I am able to pull of excellent teamwork without any communication with other good teamworkers.
Still remember being two-shot to the body with 9 ironflesh and 50 body armor by cup1d and his horn bow.
im sorry but that is not even remotely possible anymore if he had mw hornbow with mw bodkin and 8 pd even he wouldnt be able to 2 shot you in the body with 9 if and 50 body armor he would need 3-4 arrows atleast these days.
also with the new speed nerf to archers eg. increased arrow weight they cant miss with even 1 arrow or they are dead against non shielders shielders just kill in 1 on 1 always so i dont see you guys problem with archers anymore, find something else to bitch about as this is getting really really old.
atm eu1 is deadburned
Yes Jens, archers are annoying as fuck. Yes they are a good support class, but something has to be done when over half the server population consist of kiting archers, therefore the nerf adding weight to the arrows was supposed to make them unable to kite infantry for half the round making everyone annoyed by the archer running away, not facing to fight. But then again the devs. should give a better option to archers so they can actually fight, but then again, hybrid archers like Tenne can pull of the role of an archer perfectly fine, except he doesn't kite infantry half the round.Just.Quit.Whining. :rolleyes:
Just.Quit.Whining. :rolleyes:
lol if you actually read my post u would know that im 2 hander now
Didn't you say that you found 2H the best class (and therefore the most op)?
i dont think i ever said that 2 handers are op in fackt i dont think any class in is op atm only that archers are weak atm, and thats not the same as saying evry other class is op
But then again the devs. should give a better option to archers so they can actually fight
EU1 is dead again only 32 players :cry:Students like me are busy with the focken load of material that ye.. have to go back to work...
Students like me are busy with the focken load of material that ye.. have to go back to work...
EU1 probably has less players since it seems to of become the testing ground for WSE2 or at-least new ninja patches, and most of these patches people don't like so they keep away from the testing grounds :3
well EU1 seems to serve as the public testing server.
I enjoy it when there are 50 or less players on battle server. Dont like it when its crowded.
well, since you are one of the 30 ranged out of them 50 players, i believe you might have some fun, but for me more crowded is more fun, not happy with 2/3 of server being ranged when there are 20 vs 20 teams
There were 40 players yesterday morning and I bet there were at least 30 of 40 players, carrying a bow or a crossbow.
Pls gief classbalance ((((((((((((((((((((
What do you expect playing cRPG in the morning on normal week days?
Play on another server then, nobody forces you. If I dont have fun playing the game I stop and do something else. Try EU4, try EU2 or EU3 if you just want to duel. What happened to the melee server? Is it still there? If yes, why is it empty when ranged is so terrible?
we all know what the problem is.
What we need is a new xp and gold system to get the people motivated again .Maybe a mix of the old and the "new" system. So until lvl 30 or so you get xp and gold in the normal way per min.
After that you get something like the old system, only xp & gold for kills and fighting with the team. good thing back in 2010 was, even if you and your mob of angry peasants lost a round, you knew that you got something for your fight.
Nothing is worse to get killed in the first minute while having a nice x5 and then you have to hope your team wins the round. And then if your team looses,you have the main reason for GTXting i think. But when you finally have your sweet x5 you just dont want to quit and feel forced to keep playing because who the hell knows if you ever get your x5 back this day. This was just an example.
It just came to my mind and i was too lazy for a new topic.
The old system rewarded kill stealing and mass mobbing in the middle of the map and the amount of TKs and THs were unreal, everyone will probably be to busy M spamming then fighting the enemy. Plus if you die in the first minute most people alt tab out and just wait, in the old system if you died early you knew you was getting no XP or gold for that round. (even though you hardly got any gold or XP anyway)I forgot that :oops: But still, i dont like that x5 pressure.
What we need is a new xp and gold system to get the people motivated again .Maybe a mix of the old and the "new" system. So until lvl 30 or so you get xp and gold in the normal way per min.And after that grass will be greener and all ranged player will suddenly become enlightened and see truth that their class is gamebreaking and begin to masrespec to hybrid or melee.
After that you get something like the old system, only xp & gold for kills and fighting with the team. good thing back in 2010 was, even if you and your mob of angry peasants lost a round, you knew that you got something for your fight.
Nothing is worse to get killed in the first minute while having a nice x5 and then you have to hope your team wins the round. And then if your team looses,you have the main reason for GTXting i think. But when you finally have your sweet x5 you just dont want to quit and feel forced to keep playing because who the hell knows if you ever get your x5 back this day. This was just an example.
It just came to my mind and i was too lazy for a new topic.
People still complaining archers after so many nerfs?
What about hordes of 1h cav with arabian sword and arabion horse?
What about 3 skill point cav with rouncey, 1wpf in polearms and great lance?
What about so many using xbow with low wpf?
Problem are not classes, problem is BATTLE game mode that has no objectives.
heaven't played for couple of days.
joined now for some fun. instead i had throngs of projectiles of all sorts hurled at me the second i joined, angry russian kids insulting people with their stronk engrish and less than 30 people playing.
decided id rather play I am Alive...
heaven't played for couple of days.
joined now for some fun. instead i had throngs of projectiles of all sorts hurled at me the second i joined, angry russian kids insulting people with their stronk engrish and less than 30 people playing.
decided id rather play I am Alive...
I think it was French, not russian.
Gief looms! :twisted:
Well it doesn't help getting up the population if you leave =D
That's what doesn't help, even if the melee players by some miracle do beat most of the ranged there is always that one ranged player who is the last alive who will just run away. They know they can't win yet they refuse to drop the bow and arrows and get a melee weapon to even try and put up a fight.
When someone does that I think a large majority get pissed off because there's just no need for it, doing that does nothing but piss people off and make everyone wait longer to spawn.
i can tell you guys that even when i was dedicated ranged i didnt play eu 1 much as compared to eu 2 fails on several accounts.
1. no objektive's
2. often bad maps like open cav rape maps or maps with a town that one team starts much closer too.
3. way to much cav thats one of the reasons i think for the increased ammount of ranged players.
4. if you die usaly from cav within the 1 minute you have to wait maybe 5 minutes to play again where on siege you have the max 35 seconds wait time.
thats what i think is the reasons, it is for me anyway
And what about when you get shot from 4 different angles by 6 archers at the start of the round?
if you get shot by 4 different angles by 6 archers at start of round then your incredible fast for a ath 6 player cauz then you must be in their spawn a start of round;P ok serious if you get shot by that many archers then they deserve to kill you 6 vs 1? and you exspekt to surive that huh? also if you cant catch them with ath 6 then you in very heavy armor and then its not your job to catch archers but to melee other heavy armor guys let the lighter armored melee builds like me catch them i have no problem what so ever to catch them and that is with roughly 20 in gear weight so stop bitching about archers they aint the problem for eu 1 is dying.
also no i dont hate cav i find them easy to kill i was just listing the problem that might be the cause because many people still dont know how to defeat cav easy.