we had 2 battles today totalling 3500 enemy troops and gear for 2,000 enemy troops, and the coalition didn't even do rosters for either battles
I don't mean to be impolite or anything, but was this a simple oversight, or has the coalition given up on strategus?
if they've given up, i don't want to sound presumptuous, but could we start a new strategus soon? it seems to me that UIF has basicallyalmost won this round of strategussat around did nothing in castles and cities until everyone on other side got bored enough to quit to play other games and then attacked all the afks (if coalition is giving up), and i'm sure many people are wanting to start a new round, with some improvements hopefully! :) (economy rebalancing, implementation of butan's fief inventory scripts, reassessment of 1/3 troops rule)
- apostates look pretty screwed in the north
- templars are taking hard losses in the south
thanks, Corsair
Fixed
- apostates look pretty screwed in the north
Thats a mild way of putting it since they dont even exist up there :mrgreen:
But ok, if they have indeed given up, which I doubt, this strat would be over if not all clans still on the map suddenly forgot all their differences and came together in a big hug of love singing "Kumbaya my lord" and then suddenly turned as one man to the west and insulted Hetmans mother with one voice.
Invade the NA!
Invade the NA!
Arrowaine said you were all punk bitches who would stand no chance in NA - just letting you know.
Arrowaine said you were all punk bitches who would stand no chance in NA - just letting you know.
Invade the NA!
Maybe Coalition and co should have attacked UIF more when it was massively inactive and stuggling to fill rosters for every battle instead of being pussies stocking troops in castles against a vastly outnumbered enemy. It's good to see that the UIF aren't the same and will attack when they have the advantage.
First time I agree with Mercs :) Dear Coalition, if you really give up, let's sign peace and help us catch Kesh and kick her fat ass :mrgreen:
kesh said russian are retard, grey order are carebear, coalition are just bad and siting in their fief, crusader alliance inactive and merc just to good for everyone. invade na if you guys want i will be happy to merc for you.
aro willing to whore himself instead of fighting like a man.. nothing new.
your cowardly turtle tactics of stockpiling troops in the most defensible castles/cities
invade na if you guys want i will be happy to merc for you.
Shamefur dispray. If EU invades NA then it falls to all NA to group up and give them all a good thrashing! for the xp! they got over 1mil tickets in fiefs to NAs 500k... no need for NA players to sell each other out when we could have some fun working together for once.
sorry i have a outside life you know something eles then strategus :) cheer enjoy figthing yourself
Even your insults are not manly and make little sense to me.
If Eu attacks NA you plan on dropping to your knees, sticking your ass in the air and taking it deep by mercing for the attackers? Pathetic. You do not even care who would be attacking. HAHAHA
How is this for a novel thought.. IF EU attacks they land first in LCO territory.. want to know what FCC would be doing? Marching to help defend you, now grow a pair and tell them if they attack you will stomp a mud hole in the first asshat that crosses over the border.
Plus with the huge NA ping advantage they should be able to do ok for a while with their Str crutch builds despite the lack of skill?
If anti UIF wont play simply the other clans allied with UIF currently would band together against them.
If it came to it and factions were limited you could see a grey/drz war.
Its just a bit of fun - an ally can become an enemy for the sake of a game.
Well, I believe Tomas would be happy if Greys started war against DRZ after they finish coalition. But he played in strat 3 and remember what UIF did after wiping all their enemies.
On other hand now we have plenty of new factions who play for fun, so I believe there will be some nice wars anyway. Not grey/drz war though.
- templars are taking hard losses in the southThere are no Templars anymore :(
There are no Templars anymore :(you can't wipe Templars
Last fief: http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5341
Soon we will finish clearing the desert & invadeNACoalition 8-)
So thank you all for providing such nice war fun :)
sieges are meh :'|
Will i learn how to properly attack a castle? Only time will tell... that i won't.
lol we would bang NA so hard even with your advantage with ping
lol we would bang NA so hard even with your advantage with ping
lol we would bang NA so hard even with your advantage with ping
From what I have seen playing in NA-servers I would say Waradin is right, I really mean it. I am mediocre at best when playing in EU-servers with ping of 40. Playing in NA I often have better score with a ping of 150-170 - lagging. Also from the few stratbattles I have been into in NA the overall performance of the players there are way below EU-standard. This could ofc be just luck for me, or it could be that I have only been fighting bad players out of pure chance.
Im sure that there are great players in NA - no doubt about it, but the overall player has, from what I have seen, lower skills than the average EU-player. This is true especially to blockingskills and ranged I think - generally speaking ofc.
Stop bullshitting and attack already then, fucknugget EU nerd!
I'm giving you an invitation. Bitch chat around it or come get me on the internet you yuropoor pussy.
By the way Disneyland is in NA you silly fucking pillock.
Ich liebe deine Mutter.
Queerboy European.
By the way Disneyland is in NA you silly fucking pillock.
Ich liebe deine Mutter.
Queerboy European.
From what I have seen playing in NA-servers I would say Waradin is right, I really mean it. I am mediocre at best when playing in EU-servers with ping of 40. Playing in NA I often have better score with a ping of 150-170 - lagging. Also from the few stratbattles I have been into in NA the overall performance of the players there are way below EU-standard. This could ofc be just luck for me, or it could be that I have only been fighting bad players out of pure chance.
Im sure that there are great players in NA - no doubt about it, but the overall player has, from what I have seen, lower skills than the average EU-player. This is true especially to blockingskills and ranged I think - generally speaking ofc.
I'm giving you an invitation. Bitch chat around it or come get me on the internet you yuropoor pussy.Ooh what's this? http://us.disneylandparis.com/index.xhtml
By the way Disneyland is in NA you silly fucking pillock.
I do not fight in EU very often but in the two fight I bothered you guys do not impress as much as you seem to think.
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=4468
in this one 6 guys in the top 11 are NA... I was lvl 23 during this fight and had a 1:1 till the flag cap happened. On the attackers 4 of the top 12
the other
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=5057
Firebus came in second and I was 1:1 which is not to shabby when fighting across the server pond.
Sure it is a small sample size but at least to me even when I have bad ping and fighting where "your skills much greater" I have still done well enough to get hired.
So come visit for a few fights. See how it works out. I would love to see the various NA clans top people merc together
At least GOBBLING KING made this thread interesting :D
i can garanatee that we would rape you in strat
3. I sincerely doubt all NA would unite, even in the face of EU invasion. The early rosters of NA defenders would have both EU and their NA enemies apply against them, with the best and highest level making up the roster. The factions in the east may hope their enemies on the other side of the map and EU will simply wear each other down, and wait for an opportunity.
This thread needs to be renamed to "EU players agreeing with and up-voting each other about their internet egos".
But as i said, seeing is believing, maybe you're right, and after besieging Tulga's 30k garrison we'll all find Nova Tulga's 2.8k garrison absolutely terrifying xD
Did u get muted Gobbo?
Funny thing is that if GO or DRZ actually attack NA, most EU`s will merc for the NA side :lol:
I know I will
Waiting for EU baddies to try and take a 200 pop village, and loose.
Funny thing is that if GO or DRZ actually attack NA, most EU`s will merc for the NA side :lol:We will unite with Coalition into 1 faction called
EU:
Garrison: 1,017,490
Silver: 84,369,644
NA:
Garrison: 482,179
Silver: 27,312,480
Only Coalition has same amount of silvers as all NA
EU:
Garrison: 1,017,490
Silver: 84,369,644
NA:
Garrison: 482,179
Silver: 27,312,480
Damn it would be fucking awesome if Eu would unite vs NA and if there were no lag advanatages/disadvantagesTypical Euro mindset "It'd be so awesome if the huge group I'm a part of unite with a ton of other huge groups to fight a group less than half as big as our deathbloc"... we'll still kick your Euro asses, but still, that there is why EU strat sucks.
it would fucking roooooock !!! :mrgreen:
god im gonna fap now of too much imaginations :D
I think NA deserve 180 fiefs even more than EU does. Even though one could argue that the scarcity of fiefs is an incentive for more battles.
oh yes you can count on kapikulu to do something :D good luck seeing them actualy doing anything.
Say again?wooow 1st time in strat 4 history they actualy did something, took them only like year (that little action where they fought coallition a little doent count)
wooow 1st time in strat 4 history they actualy did something, took them only like year (that little action where they fought coallition a little doent count)
Ok, now tell me what Apostates achieved. Did you conquer anything at all this strat? Grunwalder Castle doesn't count since Occitan gave it to you.
NA took Fisdar... Pretty much sure that is 100% of what we wanted from EU. Thus ends the debate. NA has won strat, grats peasants!
Firstly this games about fun and I think an EU invasion of the NA map would be fun.
EU has more troops/gold/players which is why it should be EU invading, the ping will add balance.
Logistically its a bit silly but I think just before strat is to be reset a 2 week invasion of NA would be a laugh. Seeing every active EU player heading East with 3000 shiny troops would be awesome. People will immediately say cant be done but only really needs Rogue and Hetman to say ok and it would be possible.
Plus I'd like to be on the same side as merc/coalition cav for once.
Firstly this games about fun and I think an EU invasion of the NA map would be fun.
EU has more troops/gold/players which is why it should be EU invading, the ping will add balance.
Logistically its a bit silly but I think just before strat is to be reset a 2 week invasion of NA would be a laugh. Seeing every active EU player heading East with 3000 shiny troops would be awesome. People will immediately say cant be done but only really needs Rogue and Hetman to say ok and it would be possible.
Plus I'd like to be on the same side as merc/coalition cav for once.
be careful what u are asking for. A war against NA in strat is also a war against the FCC forum warriors and they alone have toppled nations..
It is even said that Kesh's downvoting of posts, blots out the sun.
Still think our sieges against Coalition are just us wiping the afkers?
I wont let the Wolves be remembered that way Thomas
Firstly this games about fun and I think an EU invasion of the NA map would be fun.
I dont give a crap how wolves are remembered by one eyed retards like tomas. His opinion is utterly irrelevant.
Yet I doubt there will be any sieges against the coalition, strat is currently in stalemate and until someone makes a move it could be like this for quite a while.
The problem with strat is that there are 3 'superpowers' the Grey's, Coaltion and DRZ and unfortunately no-one wants to declare war on any except the coalition it seems. Yet I doubt there will be any sieges against the coalition, strat is currently in stalemate and until someone makes a move it could be like this for quite a while.This:
Seems some people are incapable of posting rational thoughts or even stringing together a coherent sentence.:rolleyes:
Seems some people are incapable of posting rational thoughts or even stringing together a coherent sentence.
The problem with strat is that there are 3 'superpowers' theGrey'sGobblins,CoaltionFCC andDRZwe are the rest of NA and will fuck everybody up and unfortunately no-one wants to declare war on any except the coalition it seems. Yet I doubt there will be any sieges against thecoalitionNA RAPE TRAIN, strat is currently in stalemate and until someone makes a move it could be like this for quite a while.
This: :rolleyes:and lvl 35 is not unreachable dream anymore :P
We(uif) attack Coalition fiefs every day. Too bad that having 200k+ troops, 30kk silver & probably the support of already destroyed clans they don't want to fight back :?
Could you tell your buttbuddies to stop itembombing our castles...please?its humanitarian aid, warm socks, canned food, lubricant :P
Someone who has given up on strat surely doesn't need to be itembombed, right?
Could you tell your buttbuddies to stop itembombing our castles...please?You could always send some armies to stop the siege & sell the shit. :rolleyes: As far as I know Hetman wait for about 5min between attacks. Vovka don't use dirty tactics too.
Someone who has given up on strat surely doesn't need to be itembombed, right?
and lvl 35 is not unreachable dream anymore :PYep
its humanitarian aid, warm socks, canned food, lubricant :Poh comon vovka you should agree, that move is pure bulshit
Itembombing? I always thought it is called "loot"...It would be "loot" if it would´ve been gained from victorious battle. Instead some Crapikulu decided to drop about 130 different shit items in castle before attacking it.
For example Panos' ladders that float above forward spawns so he can drop on them, it's an exploit
Wouldn't it be nice if neither side abused shitty game mechanics that chadz never specifically said 'do this and you'll be banned'?
For example Panos' ladders that float above forward spawns so he can drop on them, it's an exploit, the ladder floats, but cos one end is touching the edge of the castle it technically isn't a sky ladder. And as your life-long ally says 'it isn't against the rules so i'm going to keep doing it'. I wonder how that makes the attackers feel when they're next confronted with the moral dilemma of abusing obviously shitty game mechanics but ones they won't get banned for?
Or the number of times a ladder is placed that deliberately or accidentally stops a siege tower, or bugs out all ladders being placed by attackers below it. Although they're nearly always broken eventually by kind defenders, you always get the few individuals shouting 'We're using it so NO!' when asked to break it. And although it's broken nearly every time in the end, it takes around 10 mins of debate the whole time that runs down the clock and only suits defenders.
Item bombing is shitty, i wouldn't do it, but everyone takes advantage of shitty exploits in this game, so unless both sides agree on certain exploits that should never be used, or the admins agree on actually making some things against the rules that are fair to both sides, i guess it'll keep happening. The argument for item bombing would be that inactive defenders deserve some kind of handicap compared to active ones. But i still think it's cheap.
Also, after Knitler the little dip$#/T itembombed us just recently,
Basic empathy, one man's 'comon sens' is another man's exploit that ruins the fun. How to make it clearer... When you're team uses a clever little trick and laughs at how the enemy can no longer attack, you're ruining it for them. And when they do the same to you they are having the exact same reaction to when you do it, 'hehe, aren't we clever'.like item bomb is on that red line
I know and like people on both sides of the blocks, when you're in that situation you get to see that it isn't all one-sided good guys/bad guys, and frankly there are twats on both sides. You clearly don't enjoy thinking about it that way, but it's not so simple as 'the enemy' are just evil and love ruining fun, and 'the good guys' use these fun and clever tricks to baffle 'the enemy'. Or maybe it is, maybe it's just 'comon sens' when you do it, but a cheating exploit when they do? CRPG community best community lol.
For example Panos' ladders that float above forward spawns so he can drop on them, it's an exploit, the ladder floats, but cos one end is touching the edge of the castle it technically isn't a sky ladder.
Damn, the hate towards a man who's carried Anti-UiF roster for so long is quite extreme! :lol:
Yes, let's attack an army outside of the castle (And thus loosing much more tickets than actually defending the castle) so the attackers cannot use the failed mechanics (also called exploiting/griefing) to fuck us up in the first minutes of the next battle.When you/mercs were on the offensive that so called item bombing and griefing and abuse of failed mechanics was fair game, totally acceptable, and real cool.
Don't exploit, simple as that. Also, after Knitler the little dip$#/T itembombed us just recently, this time someone was smart enough to capture the whole thing. Expect some punishment for your kapikulubuddies.
When you/mercs were on the offensive that so called item bombing and griefing and abuse of failed mechanics was fair game, totally acceptable, and real cool.(click to show/hide)
I'm really curious what interesting can you tell about blocking siege ramp with ladders
Yes, let's attack an army outside of the castle (And thus loosing much more tickets than actually defending the castle) so the attackers cannot use the failed mechanics (also called exploiting/griefing) to fuck us up in the first minutes of the next battle.
Don't exploit, simple as that. Also, after Knitler the little dip$#/T itembombed us just recently, this time someone was smart enough to capture the whole thing. Expect some punishment for your kapikulubuddies.
Damn, the hate towards a man who's carried Anti-UiF roster for so long is quite extreme! :lol:
Yes maybe it was wrong from Varadin to leave for XP (Which i didnt, cause you boys know i dont really need XP anymore)
Come on you two fips and knitler , you were once epic friends , chill down its just a game, i love you both , and i love greys and hre and all others.
Are you gonna hate each other when bannerlord or melee bg coems out and form new clans , are you gonna hate urself there as well ? please just forget this and enjoy playing :rolleyes:
You don't need xp, but still play on eu1 with byzantium banner and on eu2 with GO banner :rolleyes: Banner whoring at its best :P
Which banner are you whoring these days Cirilla ? :DWhich is funny because Cirilla is level 35 and using his own banner and not caring about exp anymore.
Heard you left Barabes because of lack of XP.(click to show/hide)
Which banner are you whoring these days Cirilla ? :D
Heard you left Barabes because of lack of XP.
Pff, tell me you wouldn't like to carry my banner and I'll call you bad names :P
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
I would never regret my leave, cause how you guys just keep and kept flaming on me like Erzengel (which i supported with some stuff), Netzwerg, Lange, Nikodin
cause you boys know i dont really need XP anymore
You don't need xp, but still play on eu1 with byzantium banner and on eu2 with GO banner :rolleyes: Banner whoring at its best :Pvisitors can't see pics , please register or login
1. he left cuz of me
Heard you left Barabes because of lack of XP.
Pff, tell me you wouldn't like to carry my banner and I'll call you bad names :P
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Actually they kicked me for lack of balls, but hows that my fault is beyond me :P
Actually they kicked me for lack of balls, but hows that my fault is beyond me :P
Long story short, you're all retards.
Me too?
You saying 'i will do it any time i can in the future battles' is exactly the attitude that tempts your enemies to abuse game mechanics too. I know your whole roster won't agree with you, in fact i've already seen Coalition people post in favour of reprimanding people for using these tactics.
[...]
Got to say. Ladder-blocking of the siege-ladder is not against rule, nor should be. It was me who did it, and I will do it anytime that I can, in the future battles. Not because I am a dickwide, retard or a asshat. It is simply a tactic. Closing that ramp to the siege tower gives a good advantage to the troops inside that siege tower. By using the ladders and blocking the ramp to be opened, the attackers HAD TO BACK OFF, OPEN THE RAMP, AND NEVER CLOSE IT AGAIN.
Yup. I know some asshole or two will call on this but: in my opinion what I did was using my brains, rather than my muscles. If you can't deal with it, I am sorry.
Then again you are a retard, so no suprises there.
Right. No matter. We really wanted civilize this war, but you only pretend good intentions. Kiss my ass.
BTW: Who is Bittersteel?
Good, we still hate you, though. This post should have been posted when you left us and things would be a lot different now. But you decided to post some lame-ass thread there instead of being all open about your reasons. I hope you're not ignorant enough to see why we are flaming on you like that now.
Not going into detail to all of your reasons, although nice to know finally, imo you've lost the right to have a detailed discussion about this.
Also, i'm not thinking you would be getting those looms back, because the chance of those trades to be revertable now is almost non-existent.
Come on you two fips and knitler , you were once epic friends , chill down its just a game, i love you both , and i love greys and hre and all others.
Are you gonna hate each other when bannerlord or melee bg coems out and form new clans , are you gonna hate urself there as well ? please just forget this and enjoy playing :rolleyes:
You don't need xp, but still play on eu1 with byzantium banner and on eu2 with GO banner :rolleyes: Banner whoring at its best :P
Oh knitler you are such a poor guy. I was always there for you when you had pipi in you eyes because of someone who said something bad about you.
I cant remember that i said a single word to you after you left, and now you writing such bullshit. just poor knitler just poor.
So knitters admitted ti itembombing and got away with it :o you sly dog you ;)
Right. No matter. We really wanted civilize this war, but you only pretend good intentions. Kiss my ass.lol If you really want to make some agreements speak to Rouge on ts,
BTW: Who is Bittersteel?
I admit to itembombed it, but it was no big deal. It was sorted out fairly fast.
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5316 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5316) <- Thats the battle they got "itembombed" after my earlier attack. I dont see much difference of losses to the other fights....
BTW: Who is Bittersteel?
Wait what ?
How is itembombing not a big deal if it's clearly intentional ?
Next thing we're going to see from Greys is skyladdering, and the usual :
*that's the battle where we skyladdered. Look, i don't see much difference of losses to the other fights*
That's one fucked up argument right there...
First of all, i "kinda" itembombed, yes. But thats no big deal and wasnt even heavily damaging you, it also was an accident, i just dumped my shit i had into the castle cause i thought you´ll sort it out anyway, it was like some seconds too late. I actually wanted to sell them, but it didnt worked, so i put the stuff in, NOT KNOWING why selling wasnt working, till Rogue came on TS and "kindly" told me how it worked. If you dont want to belive me go on.
Right. No matter. We really wanted civilize this war, but you only pretend good intentions. Kiss my ass.
BTW: Who is Bittersteel?
Let me answer that with another quote before i go to sleep again ;)
Sorry for not knowing, i never had a fief ...
Haha, oh my. Get off that high horse dude.
Some kid from the Kalmar Union, called sir kurwa or fifi or something.
NA took Fisdar... Pretty much sure that is 100% of what we wanted from EU. Thus ends the debate. NA has won strat, grats peasants!The fact that they attacked a clan that had given up on strat and only had half a roster. Also the roster was around 95% EU members since they tried using there own members but failed every time so they decided not to use its own members and let the greys take it for them 8-).
Item bombing = ban.
Item bombing is nothing compared to this:I'd say ban for stealing that wall, what next, will they try to sneak out with the keep or the gatehouse in their bags at night?(click to show/hide)
Item bombing is nothing compared to this:(click to show/hide)
Just to avoid any problems, and knowing Kapıkulu would never stick with their word, we only put around 30 or so items back, where an another 50 remained on me, which was originally planned to be placed back.
Actually you are very wrong. At the beginning of the battle Ozan explained you struck the deal and asked us all to hold on with the attack to let you sort out the eq. Quite on contrary I was VERY surprised that you didn't stick to the deal cause I actually expected Coallition - of all factions - to follow to the word given...
Sad.
Just to avoid any problems, and knowing Kapıkulu would never stick with their word
I don't think I quite follow you here, in what way did we not honor the agreement? Our part of that deal was to get rid of the excess gear from the item bomb, which we, too our great relief, managed to do quite fast. The enemies part was to give us time to do that. If Ozan said something like to this effect, all glory to him, but what we saw was quite different. We were besieged the moment the battle started. Building cats and all the other assorted stuff is not exactly "giving time", because as the defender it is of course in our interest to deny the attacker doing this as best as we can. Which the item bomb denied us from doing from the get go. And yes, we did not have much faith in a word given by Kapilulu, which is hardly surprising.
I don't think I quite follow you here, in what way did we not honor the agreement? Our part of that deal was to get rid of the excess gear from the item bomb, which we, too our great relief, managed to do quite fast. The enemies part was to give us time to do that.
What great evil did we commit Harpag? Did the floating wall scare you? This was some kind of glitch caused by attacker catapults hitting something, the backwall of the castle to be precise. We had nothing to do with this, blame the bad aim of attackers engineers and the almighty strat bugs for this.
What really is this coalition?
Yes. We actually discussed using a part of our wall to block Catapults. It is a grey-area, you know? And about the ladders used from the castles / cities. I have no idea why everyone is so butt-hurt about them. It is unrealistic? Forward-spawns are unrealistic. Equipment chests that you can spawn hundreds of ladders, siege shields, stakes and different equipment types are unrealistic. Using ladders to protect forward-spawns and key locations are unrealistic, as it is not the main purpose of the ladder itself. Claiming someone accidentally item-bombed a fief, who plays the game for some time is unrealistic. Item bombing the same Castle twice, in a row, and not stopping until someone goes and confronts them is unrealistic. A ladder was bugging the attacker ladders, at Uhhun Castle. When attackers asked, Coalition people destroyed that ladder, where it was used for archers. Knowing that and bitching about Coalition, not wanting a fair game is unrealistic.
Then again you are a retard, so no suprises there.
Use of siege equipment:
1) Ladders
1.1) Floating ladders. You are not allowed to stay on floating ladders. If for some reason your ladder becomes floating, you are to get off it, even if it means suicide.
1.2) Ladderplacement. For now there are no rules on unrealistic ladders, so they are allowed. (as long as you keep the other rules in mind)
1.3) Siege-equipment on ladders is not allowed. This includes using siege shields, other ladders and everything you can make with a construction-site.
1.4) Ladders in open battles (anti cav) are allowed as long as the ladder is legit according to rule 1.2.
1.5) Cavalry is allowed to use ladders.
Are you for real? Oh wait,
Says someone who uses wooden stakes to make their Siege Ladder unmoveable, but bitches when ladders are used to block the ramp. lol.
Siege Ladder is unmovable? No shit :wink:
I`ll keep doing it, because god damn it feels good everytime I land on your Forward Spawn seeing you wankers panicking while I destroy it like a motherfucking boss.
You are more than welcome Panos, jugding by your stats in most of battles you do more harm than good to the defenders....
Forward point acrobat is a risky bizness.
10 lives to destroy 1 FB, in the end it was
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
so each FB cost 1cs and 35 materials
on each siege drz take 60 cs and 1800 materials
question: how many panoses def needed for waste it all? if each one from panoses need 10 lives to destroy 1 FB :P
so each FB cost 1cs and 35 materials
on each siege drz take 60 cs and 1800 materials
question: how many panoses def needed for waste it all? if each one from panoses need 10 lives to destroy 1 FB :P
From what I know now, I seriously think the Kapikulus respected their words, and the Coalition wasnt polite in not "displaying" that they were ready to engage the fight, but it was more a lack of micro-management than a deliberate attempt to fuck you up.
Rogue wouldnt have wasted 5 minutes telling us to waste our lives to waste items if he knew we would have almost 0 item-bombing problems.
Big respect for Kapi if you really managed to hold your men at the beginning of the siege, sorry you didnt receive any warnings on our battle-ready, but the spirit was there.
Would probably need more than one panos, and god knows one panos is already too much :mrgreen:
Can we PLEASE get back on topic? How EU wouldn't stand a chance invading NA?
Can we PLEASE get back on topic? How EU wouldn't stand a chance invading NA?U not deserve to be invaded!
Yeah, let's talk about how unhonourable Coalition is by not following a deal after being itembombed for the second time in a very short period of time. If you itembomb someone (And thus doing it with the intention to do so, you do not itembomb someone by accident) you have no right to complain about some stupid deal not being hold on to. Plus, from what i've heard there was some guy on your TS beforehand and not getting accepted, thus coming over to COA TS and telling the guys that Kapis decided not to stick to any deal. Whether that's true or not, the fact remains that the most unhonourable thing here is theFtfyitembomb itselfstacking of over 10k troops to abuse the 1/3 rule. Hypocrisy at it's best.
You should roster for the Greys in an open field battle some time when they're attackers xD really funny stuff, people who usually do will know what i'm talking about ;P 'oh no, our construction site! We needed that! And all we got was all this green...'
30mins later of rinse and repeat, flags are capped. Epic lolz.
Honestly, sometimes they're small siege towers or healing tents xD but they always bring in the green as defenders push. And all attackers need is green.
Plus, from what i've heard there was some guy on your TS beforehand and not getting accepted, thus coming over to COA TS and telling the guys that Kapis decided not to stick to any deal. Whether that's true or not, the fact remains that the most unhonourable thing here is the itembomb itself. Hypocrisy at it's best.
I think you should name and shame (tell us who told you someone did this and then work out who the person was that switched TS's)
Ozan made it very clear that we would give you time to sort your equipment out. (he repeated it 2 or 3 times to make sure everyone heard and understood)
Also, no one is denying that item-bombing is unhonourable (or more/less than anything else). That's why Ozan agreed to give you time to sort it, why Knitter has apologised etc.
Yeah, let's talk about how unhonourable Coalition is by not following a deal after being itembombed for the second time in a very short period of time. If you itembomb someone (And thus doing it with the intention to do so, you do not itembomb someone by accident) you have no right to complain about some stupid deal not being hold on to. Plus, from what i've heard there was some guy on your TS beforehand and not getting accepted, thus coming over to COA TS and telling the guys that Kapis decided not to stick to any deal. Whether that's true or not, the fact remains that the most unhonourable thing here is the itembomb itself. Hypocrisy at it's best.
Cookies anyone??
As an attacker, I was not told why we where going to give you time to sort your equipment (didn't know it was knitter, thought it was just equip from previous fight) and seeing the lack of honor in strat I thought it was the wrong move to make by Ozan.
Item bombing is nothing compared to this:(click to show/hide)
Also if one wanted to be 100% strict, ignoring the item-bombing does not protect from being punished for item-bombing.
Knitler, what really "didnt work" when you tried to sell the items that you had to manually transfer all your shit in a castle, selecting "Uhhun Castle" in a list of possibly more than one guy you could have transfered your items to? I guess you're not the only grey inside the besieged castle.
And a veteran like you never heard of item-bombing ? Never been in ONE STRAT FIGHT, where you saw yourself the effect of item-bombing and been explained how it happened ?
Knitler only put a few items into a different castle, not even close to what Kapis did twice at Sungetche (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaHU86Ym2B4&feature=youtu.be), that happened already like a week ago and was quickly solved with a quick talk on TS. Although what he posted here differs from what he said on TS (you do not transfer to a castle by accident!), but whatever.
Can we PLEASE get back on topic? How EU wouldn't stand a chance invading NA?
Mon Dieu !
This is entertaining.
Can i have a warning ? here a picture of a mexican :(click to show/hide)
Thanks.
That bug is back again or wut oo?
But harpag, seriously. Its cause of the catas. There are some battles some time ago;
As you can see you could have walked up the wall even it was vertical normal.
Was Jamiche Castle i guess.
Thats right, I dont need XP, would be funny if i hit Lvl.36 tho. I play with Byzantiums when they are online, never gonna play with the GO-Banner on EU1. On EU2 i will, i asked if its ok and it is, its not about XP. Its just that i want to play with some ppl, if you see me online somewhere, with any banner, im mostly in there TS and talking too.
According to topic im more worried what is happening to greys. Since some of them i see they fill opposite roster. This nice war we have should't end too fast
According to topic im more worried what is happening to greys. Since some of them i see they fill opposite roster. This nice war we have should't end too fast
I don't agree to that. Those who are fighting with Coalition, are fighting with us because they don't like Kapıkulu. They hate it to some extend. And they have every right to have hatred towards Kapıkulu. But when a Siege occurs between Coalition and GO, they will roster for themselves. Which is okay.I see here another guy with cancer :P But in this case, brain cancer :?
Funny thing it is. Both sides, their allies (not entirely perhaps, but still) and enemies hate Kapıkulu the same. That surely must say something.
I don't agree to that. Those who are fighting with Coalition, are fighting with us because they don't like Kapıkulu. They hate it to some extend. And they have every right to have hatred towards Kapıkulu. But when a Siege occurs between Coalition and GO, they will roster for themselves. Which is okay.
Funny thing it is. Both sides, their allies (not entirely perhaps, but still) and enemies hate Kapıkulu the same. That surely must say something.
I don't agree to that. Those who are fighting with Coalition, are fighting with us because they don't like Kapıkulu. They hate it to some extend. And they have every right to have hatred towards Kapıkulu. But when a Siege occurs between Coalition and GO, they will roster for themselves. Which is okay.Nope, only you hate Kapis. We have Mercs to hate :lol:
Funny thing it is. Both sides, their allies (not entirely perhaps, but still) and enemies hate Kapıkulu the same. That surely must say something.
I see here another guy with cancer :P But in this case, brain cancer :?
Nope, only you hate Kapis. We have Mercs to hate :lol:
No. We had Mercs to hate :cry: :cry: :cry:STAY AWAY FROM OUR MERCS! WAR!
Im still standing so u can hate me all u want :)get away! do not bother us to argue
STAY AWAY FROM OUR MERCS! WAR!(click to show/hide)
Im still standing so u can hate me all u want :)
What? YOUR MERCS? Mercs have always been OUR main enemy, not your! Jebać Drużynę :PThis means WAR! Now you should attack the desert! Attacking only hight populated castles appreciated :twisted: You could start from Samarra.
I personally hate desert. Warm, stinking camels and no water :D
Think u got it wrong Erasmus - DRZ are russians, which not even are closely related to camels
So you still are not decided which part you wanna join in the war called "These were my Mercs", right? :D :D :D :D
Sort of by the way: it came to my mind that we have an excelent source of income here: We will organize trips to Dhirim to make public shows with the old teethlesstigerpussy in the cage, for silver. The demand for this kind of entertainment may not be overwhelming, but still ... :D
Greys were fighting us while we were active, you fought us while we were inactive. I think they are the ones that can say "They are our main enemy"
mercs have been semi active at best since i joined :P the long period where greys etc didn't play really killed activity. im just hoping for a reset soonish to get everyone active :D
mercs have been semi active at best since i joined :P the long period where greys etc didn't play really killed activity. im just hoping for a reset soonish to get everyone active :D
Buuut my big hope for next strat is no more fief voting. and different alliances/wars because I was templar in strat 1 so ive been fighting DRZ/UIF for so damn long i get bored :D i just wanna do something different hence Wessex ^^
yeah, join GO and see how it feels to be a cheater :wink:
yeah, join GO and see how it feels to be a cheater :wink:
yeah, join GO and see how it feels to be a cheater :wink:
You're so cute sometimes Panos.
Well, if you wouldn't be such a troll Banos, I'd invite you too to see for yourself :)
we didn't play cos of heavy fishy banwave
Just for the record- last round more than 100 greys logged in from one IP. Over one hundred warband keys from a single household. Your fucked up sense of fairness is what forces us to take steps like this in the first place. So would you kindly get rid of this attitude?
Calling GO cheaters, is not something I made up, various members of your clan got banned for cheating in the past, so actually my statement is not biased nor made up.
Basically if you think of it, GO has cheated in all of the strategus rounds so far..
You people are a fucking joke :lol:
Which they already payed for. The bans are almost a year old, get over it already!
And as you said, they did it in the past :wink:
i hope we roleplay actual mercs and get to fight for all sides for gold/land but somehow i think mercs current enemies wont allow it :(
Which they already payed for. The bans are almost a year old, get over it already!
And as you said, they did it in the past :wink:
We have a Greek saying "It`s better to lose your eye, than the trust of your name".
i hope we roleplay actual mercs and get to fight for all sides for gold/land but somehow i think mercs current enemies wont allow it :(
I wasnt part of strat one, but of what ive heard this role they had there was great. Prolly the funnest thing to do, but you can only pull it through if you are strong enough to be untouchable i guess.
Once a cheater, always a cheater.
In the next update the 1/3 rule will be ignored when you attack with 1.800 or more troops. The maximum battle time depends on the smaller army only: with 1.800 troops you get ~80 minutes, to get the maximum of 3 hours you would need ~9.300 troops with the current formula (http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+x^0.56+-+1.15^%28x%2F2000%29+%2B+15+from+x%3D100+to+9300).
Thats because all their 100 brothers and sisters play now in the same house
Thats the way all mercs have wanted it to go, but we keep being pulled back into the east v west war
:mrgreen:Grey OrderHarpag HQ
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
http://forum.melee.org/closed-requests/ban-18528/
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
From what I have heard in the first round of Strat the rules on logging in on other's cd-key's weren't all that clear, at least at first. I have been told that it was pretty commonly done by a lot of clans including the early Shogunate leadership. Sure the Greys carried it to an extreme level, but I don't think it was as black and white as nowadays whether it was considered cheating.
Doubt the entire early Coalition or Merc leadership has clean hands even in this very regard. Not too consider various other bug exploiting instances. There is no morally superior side in Strat, Strat brings out the worst in everyone.
If that's the case then shouldn't cmp/chadz/whatever have never allowed you to play crpg again? I mean no way people can learn to behave, right?
Once a cheater, always a cheater.
We have a Greek saying "It`s better to lose your eye, than the trust of your name".
If that's the case then shouldn't cmp/chadz/whatever have never allowed you to play crpg again? I mean no way people can learn to behave, right?
Oh, and last I checked DaveUKR sorta admitted to having used another merc members account for strat for something.
If that's the case then shouldn't cmp/chadz/whatever have never allowed you to play crpg again? I mean no way people can learn to behave, right?
Oh, and last I checked DaveUKR sorta admitted to having used another merc members account for strat for something.
The problem is in Strategus itself. They should add some built-in tools for faction leaders so they can control members without logging in. Strategus should be easier and should not contain micromanagement.
but then what would be the incentive for anyone but 1-2 leaders ever logging on or playing?
but then what would be the incentive for anyone but 1-2 leaders ever logging on or playing?more micromanagmet then
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5445
1 6 0 0 0 0 0 xp :shock:
If we at EU were smart we would have wargoals and not always smashing one faction to death leading to boredom at strat after that.you forgot that you still have Rindyar Castle?
Leaders of Coalition and UIF should sit together and make one area of the map to the "battlefield" ;) whoever gets it is winner. After that another area etc.
So we could have battles forever ;) I love the xp but i think it will be over soon.
you forgot that you still have Rindyar Castle?
Its almost untakeable, so it is probably infinity xp for your side
4.25kk xp today from 4 battles
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Offtopic:
Meanwhile in Russia:(click to show/hide)
The problem is in Strategus itself. They should add some built-in tools for faction leaders so they can control members without logging in. Strategus should be easier and should not contain micromanagement.
I wonder how capis chose eq for battles
over 1000 rus bows on last siege looted -_-
once they give us over 1200 +3 h. guantels
some around 20k CM ect, no one counts ladders...
Costy ladders item bombing tactic :P
Actually, it shows that the strategus economy now is too inflated to become an important part of the game. It has removed the incentive to hand-pick your army composition and like many have stated before, the armies are becoming pretty much all the same in terms of armors and weapons choices.
Who cares about a few thousands 5-50 price items too much ?
Looks like they constantly respec captured fiefs.
Don't know why but some clans still use crap equipment on EU. Templars, Guards, Wolves etc. But nowadays you could equip full-plate army with only 1 caravan run. :?
NA is another story. Everybody still are poor there. Looks like they constantly respec captured fiefs. The richest NA fief(New Asugan Castle) located on 11th place by goods production. http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusfieflist&view=default
Don't know why but some clans still use crap equipment on EU. Templars, Guards, Wolves etc. But nowadays you could equip full-plate army with only 1 caravan run. :?
NA is another story. Everybody still are poor there. Looks like they constantly respec captured fiefs. The richest NA fief(New Asugan Castle) located on 11th place by goods production. http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusfieflist&view=default
Don't know why but some clans still use crap equipment on EU. Templars, Guards, Wolves etc. But nowadays you could equip full-plate army with only 1 caravan run. :?
NA is another story. Everybody still are poor there. Looks like they constantly respec captured fiefs. The richest NA fief(New Asugan Castle) located on 11th place by goods production. http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusfieflist&view=default
Also we ended up making whole territories, NA clans end up scattered and spread out, whereas Coalition, Greys, Druz, Templar, Wolves, Mercs and Nords staked out large territories for themselves from the start, some large enough to trade even interiorly for a decent profit. Easier to control more fiefs that way.
no_rules + phil best catapult team:your pic is photoshopped.it's an unfair comparisonbobby catapult:(click to show/hide)krapikulu catapult?(click to show/hide)(click to show/hide)
Coalition won the Strat, party is over!oh look, the greys even left us a gift for their defeat!
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
For that one person it must have been an honor 8-)