Has the coalition given up?

[Aderyn]

Plus with the huge NA ping advantage they should be able to do ok for a while with their Str crutch builds despite the lack of skill?

Hell yeah, invade the NA!

[woody]

If anti UIF wont play simply the other clans allied with UIF currently would band together against them.

If it came to it and factions were limited you could see a grey/drz war.

Its just a bit of fun - an ally can become an enemy for the sake of a game.

[Tomas]

If anti UIF wont play simply the other clans allied with UIF currently would band together against them.

If it came to it and factions were limited you could see a grey/drz war.

Its just a bit of fun - an ally can become an enemy for the sake of a game.

Possibly the most deluded post I've seen in a long time

[woody]

Oh dear, yet another who doesnt realise its just a game. Being deluded is thinking alliances etc in a game like this actually mean anything, in fact thinking this game means anything at all is a serious delusion, its just a bit of fun, if no enemies in game you find/create one.

[serr]

Well, I believe Tomas would be happy if Greys started war against DRZ after they finish coalition. But he played in strat 3 and remember what UIF did after wiping all their enemies.
On other hand now we have plenty of new factions who play for fun, so I believe there will be some nice wars anyway. Not grey/drz war though.

[bagge]

Well, I believe Tomas would be happy if Greys started war against DRZ after they finish coalition. But he played in strat 3 and remember what UIF did after wiping all their enemies.
On other hand now we have plenty of new factions who play for fun, so I believe there will be some nice wars anyway. Not grey/drz war though.

When UIF won strat 3, they had lots of battles 1,5k v 1,5k open field maps. Which was for everyone. Good times.

[serr]

True, but that happened later - when devs announced strat 4. UIF won strat 3 several months before that.

[Segd]

- templars are taking hard losses in the south

There are no Templars anymore 
Last fief: http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5341

Soon we will finish clearing the desert & invade NA Coalition 

[Rebelyell]

There are no Templars anymore 
Last fief: http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5341

Soon we will finish clearing the desert & invade NA Coalition 

you can't wipe Templars
Templars wipe themself(me including)

Anyway thx DRZ for being good  enemy that you can never thrust ^^.
Strat with whole drama abuze and broke shiet is still really intresting experience.

[Tactical_One]

Don't know what happen to crusaders, i thought they are strong aliance. Desert war was quicker than i thought. Now Coalition is powerful, and remants from difrent clans are comming to their ranks. Defintely they don't have roster problems. There are insane numbers of disciplined coalition players on each battle, so they can pick rest of squad from best merc that aplied. So i belive they can produce very much troops. If they gathered enought silver it should be very long and nice war.

Combined forces of drz, GO, Kapi, Shu han donno mayby wolves and baldes have chance to win it. Especially that they seems to be very good strategicaly. Definetly they won't run of silver, since they can actally make long range trades within own borders.

So thank you all for providing such nice war fun

[Latvian]

oh yes you can count on kapikulu to do something   good luck seeing them actualy doing anything.

[Torben]

So thank you all for providing such nice war fun

I'd love to see the territorial aspect of strat be downsized a bit in favor of coming out of the castles and doing some field battles,  which seem less bugged and more fun in general.  That,  ofc,  would go in hand with loosing a higher amount of troops and jeopardizing the safety of fiefs,  which I would prefer  just for the sake of fun.

sieges are meh :'|

[Butan]

sieges are meh :'|

Especially fiefs without an openable gate to sail forth from (cavs are useful in this case).


Plea for proper gatehouses on each maps:

(click to show/hide)

Maps with gates are far more interesting to play in since its an opportunity for both attackers and defenders:

- attackers often try to get control of those "chokepoints" where they can further infiltrate the fiefs fortifications
- defenders can destroy siege equipment / delay the incoming waves by sending men outside the fortifications



I dont approve people who complains about villages/castles/cities being difficult to take or difficult to defend (depending on the PoV); and that they want mappers to modify them so that they are easier to defend (when defending) or attack (when attacking).

But I would love to see all maps having destroyable walls (this seems to have been fixed) and openable gates.

The maps already have kind of "weak points" (that siege commanders need to properly protect or exploit) and its very fun to see how a siege can completely get overwhelmed by attackers or defenders annihilating all hopes of winning, with the same 51 vs 51 players and on the same map, on all map. With openable gates on all maps it would be even funnier.

[Bittersteel]

Will i learn how to properly attack a castle? Only time will tell... that i won't.

[Butan]

Will i learn how to properly attack a castle? Only time will tell... that i won't.

I think half the strategus sphere knows not to give you more than a hundred unarmed troops.