cRPG

Strategus => Diplomacy => Topic started by: Elindor on November 21, 2012, 07:37:08 pm

Title: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 21, 2012, 07:37:08 pm

TAMDA has been revised into a new vision:
The Free Lands of the Tundra (http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/free-lands-of-the-tundra/)



visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login




- TEXT VERSION -
(click to show/hide)

*NOTE:  Agreement applies to any area controlled by member factions -AND- tiled with snow on the map (tundra) *

---

Additionally, FCC has stated that they will provide assistance to any small clan in the tundra area (within the TAMDA or not) that finds itself being invaded by a hostile large clan, but they will not get involved in tundra wars between small clans.


:!: If you would like to sign your faction to this agreement, please notify ELINDOR  :!:


Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 21, 2012, 07:57:19 pm
The Beautiful winter area will become a peaceful place.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on November 21, 2012, 07:59:31 pm
The Beautiful winter area will become a peaceful place.

In a war game?  Good luck with that.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on November 21, 2012, 08:21:03 pm
Most of our holdings are outside the tundra.  However, the Free Companies of Calradia agrees to defend and support the other tundra clans (whether they are in this agreement or not) against any incursion by a LARGE clan (25+ members).  We do this in the spirit of fair play.  If a 5 man faction attempts to take a fief from one of the smaller tundra clans, we would support these minor wars between small clans and feel it would be unjust for us as a 40+ member faction to get involved.

Any large/medium clan (25+ members), we would act to support the tundra clans against what has been happening in the desert (e.g. Hospitaller v Hero Party, VE v. Chevalieres).

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 21, 2012, 08:23:44 pm
Most of our holdings are outside the tundra.  However, the Free Companies of Calradia agrees to defend and support the other tundra clans against any incursion by a LARGE clan (25+ members).  We do this in the spirit of fair play.  If a 5 man faction attempts to take a fief from one of the smaller tundra clans, we would support these minor wars between small clans and feel it would be unjust for us as a 40+ member faction to get involved.

Any large/medium clan (25+ members), we would act to support the tundra clans against what has been happening in the desert (e.g. Hospitaller v Hero Party, VE v. Chevalieres).

(click to show/hide)

We appreciate your support Kesh, and are glad to continue the relations between us and FCC.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on November 21, 2012, 08:26:39 pm
We appreciate your support Kesh, and are glad to continue the relations between us and FCC.
(click to show/hide)

Feel free to, just keep in mind our restrictions on small clan wars (addendum maybe)- we will do nothing if a small clan acts aggressively in the tundra, we think this will be a good thing to prevent it getting stale up here and also that we will act even if a non-member tundra clan is facing incursion by a 25+ member faction.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Spanish on November 21, 2012, 08:38:51 pm
Can we all hold hands now? Cuz I'm feeling left out :/ Besides the tundra is lame without a fisdnar

Oh yeah and congrats on making friends in the snow Elindor! :D
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 21, 2012, 08:42:37 pm
Can we all hold hands now? Cuz I'm feeling left out :/ Besides the tundra is lame without a fisdnar


Wow writing a comment with this colour is so ill for real
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 21, 2012, 08:58:11 pm
Added to first post:

Additionally, FCC has stated that they will provide assistance to any small clan in the tundra area (within the TAMDA or not) that finds itself being invaded by a hostile large clan, but they will not get involved in tundra wars between small clans.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Mae. on November 21, 2012, 09:03:56 pm
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on November 21, 2012, 09:07:06 pm
the tundra is lame without a fisdnar

Words so true they bring tears to these old wizard's eyes.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 21, 2012, 09:10:04 pm
Words so true they bring tears to these old wizard's eyes.

Alas, this is true...but the Free Peasants are welcome to apply to TAMDA anyhow.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: arowaine on November 21, 2012, 09:41:21 pm
look like interesting.... look forward to see what will happen over there.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Malaclypse on November 21, 2012, 10:04:20 pm
Looks like the small faction of SWF has been attacked by another small faction, TFF, in Ismirala.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on November 21, 2012, 10:06:49 pm
Looks like the small faction of SWF has been attacked by another small faction, TFF, in Ismirala.

yeah we are not going to do anything about it except maybe apply for both sides.  Should be fun fight. :)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 21, 2012, 10:59:53 pm
Looks like the small faction of SWF has been attacked by another small faction, TFF, in Ismirala.

Yes, since neither is in TAMDA and both are small clans, this event is not something for us to get involved in.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Hobb on November 21, 2012, 11:30:33 pm
More like the: Tundra Area Mutual Pact Of Nations

Amirite guys???
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 21, 2012, 11:56:19 pm
More like the: Tundra Area Mutual Pact Of Nations

Amirite guys???

Tampon lol hobb
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 22, 2012, 12:02:55 am
I REFUSE TO SIGN THIS!

Simply because it looks like a way to gain more allies against us if we decide to come back and poke at those fiefs  :twisted:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Calford on November 22, 2012, 02:39:55 am
I REFUSE TO SIGN THIS!

Simply because it looks like a way to gain more allies against us if we decide to come back and poke at those fiefs  :twisted:

Ill be completely honest here. I have no love for this place, no love for the Cold, no love for the Tundra, Not even love for Karindi. however there is a family of snowmen outside of Karindi that I have very much fallen in love with. So I'll be blunt here, You can take back all of the Tundra for all i care, but if the Jones family is in any way harm, I will hunt you... and I will kill you.  :evil:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on November 22, 2012, 02:41:02 am
Tampon lol hobb
It is supposed to help stop the flow of blood.
Alas, this is true...but the Free Peasants are welcome to apply to TAMDA anyhow.

Good to hear that the north supports free men.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: MURDERTRON on November 22, 2012, 02:49:21 am
So is this the beginning of an Empire in the North?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on November 22, 2012, 02:54:28 am
Whatever bloodbath you gentlemen wish to start, please leave us out of it as we have no intentions for violence (and our borders are open to all traders).

Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 22, 2012, 04:27:40 am
So is this the beginning of an Empire in the North?

No.

Whatever bloodbath you gentlemen wish to start, please leave us out of it as we have no intentions for violence (and our borders are open to all traders).

Artyem, as it states in the document, this is a DEFENSIVE agreement.

de·fen·sive /diˈfensiv/
Adjective:   
1. Used or intended to defend or protect: "troops in defensive positions".
2. (in sports) Relating to or intended as defense.

Antonyms:   attacking, harmful, hurtful, injurious, threatening
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sauce on November 22, 2012, 06:09:15 am
Not the Northern Empire the Tundra needs, but the Northern Empire the Tundra deserves.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Smoothrich on November 22, 2012, 06:26:24 am
Most of our holdings are outside the tundra.  However, the Free Companies of Calradia agrees to defend and support the other tundra clans (whether they are in this agreement or not) against any incursion by a LARGE clan (25+ members).  We do this in the spirit of fair play.  If a 5 man faction attempts to take a fief from one of the smaller tundra clans, we would support these minor wars between small clans and feel it would be unjust for us as a 40+ member faction to get involved.


lol, FCC = Hypocrisy personified. 

Death to the NA UIF.  Long live the real UIF.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on November 22, 2012, 06:27:30 am
Artyem, as it states in the document, this is a DEFENSIVE agreement.

de·fen·sive /diˈfensiv/
Adjective:   
1. Used or intended to defend or protect: "troops in defensive positions".
2. (in sports) Relating to or intended as defense.

Antonyms:   attacking, harmful, hurtful, injurious, threatening

No, really?  You don't say?  Usually a defense needs an attack, and neither myself or my clan wants any part of whatever bloodbath you get involved in.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BaleOhay on November 22, 2012, 06:39:29 am
that is to bad arty. Would have liked you to be a part of that. IT is basically the north fighting it out and banding together in times of need against outside threats of large clans trying to push their way in and take over.

the old I fight my brother. My brother and I fight my cousins, my family and I fight everyone else type of mentality. Worked for Scotland! It could work for you.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 22, 2012, 06:52:24 am
Usually a defense needs an attack, and neither myself or my clan wants any part of whatever bloodbath you get involved in.

That's fine, no one's trying to make you.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on November 22, 2012, 07:44:04 am
lol, FCC = Hypocrisy personified. 

Death to the NA UIF.  Long live the real UIF.

Just as long as you don't tell everyone about our oil money financing coming from the piping in the arctic snow.  :wink:

Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on November 22, 2012, 07:50:49 am
That sounds great and all, but this could have been proposed to all of the northern factions by separate invitation rather than just having two clans hop in and expect the rest to follow.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 22, 2012, 07:54:47 am
That sounds great and all, but this could have been proposed to all of the northern factions by separate invitation rather than just having two clans hop in and expect the rest to follow.

This idea was brought up by Wesley who approached Sauce and I and we discussed and put this out, with the intention that other small clans in the area would see it and ask to join the agreement (such as Dracul).  I apologize if it seems we were leaving people out, that was not the intention.

Dracul is welcome to join the agreement.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Shik on November 22, 2012, 08:12:39 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on November 22, 2012, 08:31:10 am
This idea was brought up by Wesley who approached Sauce and I and we discussed and put this out, with the intention that other small clans in the area would see it and ask to join the agreement (such as Dracul).  I apologize if it seems we were leaving people out, that was not the intention.

Dracul is welcome to join the agreement.

With some reconsideration, I'll hold a vote and see what my clan wants.

EDIT:

That vote went by quickly, the consensus is yes, I need to add one of you on steam for quick negotiation I guess.



Also, I apologize if I came off as a bit abrasive, I just get defensive and a bit overly cautious when my neighbors start jumping into agreements.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on November 22, 2012, 10:45:23 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


I'm guessing that the Free Peasants are the guy with the hood, or we have been unjustly left out of this image.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 22, 2012, 12:57:06 pm
Are you crazy I'm "Sith emperor" Darth vador wouldve been legit though I.E in game name Darth_WesleyVador.

And my steam name is Grimes123 you can add me if you want to discuss joining The Northern EmpireTAMDA  :wink:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on November 22, 2012, 03:53:36 pm
(click to show/hide)

i don't think KUTT is joining (purple guy) or Hospitallers (guy with cross).  Nice picture though.  Big difference from before is that Northern Empire ws made up of all the largest NA clans talking about how brave they are whiel not fighting anyone whereas both HG and Teutons fought KUTT to get their lands, also this is many of the smallest NA clans - subtle, I know but 1/10 the size of the old one and just to be on even footing with the other large factions.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Chestaclese on November 22, 2012, 05:26:58 pm
Northern Empire Ready Defense Signers. Bunch of fucking nerds.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Calford on November 22, 2012, 09:40:31 pm
This idea was brought up by Wesley who approached Sauce and I and we discussed and put this out, with the intention that other small clans in the area would see it and ask to join the agreement (such as Dracul).  I apologize if it seems we were leaving people out, that was not the intention.

Dracul is welcome to join the agreement.

There is room enough for hand holding for everyone, though be careful around Tom Cruise he likes to touch buts.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 22, 2012, 10:31:01 pm
Butts* Get it right dummy  :D
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: kinngrimm on November 23, 2012, 12:43:31 am
CFA members welcomes all TAMDA members. Peace & trade for the North!

Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on November 23, 2012, 01:27:13 am
Wesley has approached me with an invitation for the Frisian Freedom to join TAMDA; however, we have declined at this time. Good luck to all members.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sir_Mahtin on November 23, 2012, 05:42:32 am
Legit.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 23, 2012, 08:42:48 am
With some reconsideration, I'll hold a vote and see what my clan wants.

EDIT:

That vote went by quickly, the consensus is yes, I need to add one of you on steam for quick negotiation I guess.



Also, I apologize if I came off as a bit abrasive, I just get defensive and a bit overly cautious when my neighbors start jumping into agreements.

I accepted you on Steam, we can discuss whenever you're on.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 23, 2012, 06:54:49 pm
I mean no offense when I write this,


But honestly, I see this as you guys are somehow scared of us coming back and taking back all those fiefs that were awarded to you. I have had Wesley ask me at least 4 times where we stand with Teutonics, and I haven't given him an answer. Remnants and I have made peace, but I hold HG separately from them and seeing as HG seems to be the only ones still in the Tundra (and not Remnants from what I can see) it just seems that this Defense Agreement is specifically targeted to protect all of you from big ole bad KUTT  :lol:



If I sign this treaty, does that mean I get to rape your S&D in every fief and if you attack me, everyone in the agreement has to stand on my side of the war? Cuz if so, I might be in just for shits & giggles!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 23, 2012, 08:57:36 pm
You know Tanken writing something like this is pretty silly. If you joined the alliance its not a given to grant S&D to everyone in the pact. We ask each other first. You can do as you wish in strat. Giving you 30k in strat to help you out(Was going to give you another 30k) but I'm not sure if I want to. I really don't care about you joining. If you want me to attack you I'll be happy to. As far as I'm concerned you could say we are "Neutral".
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 23, 2012, 10:02:06 pm
Im just saying its silly to have this agreement when both Teutonics and Remnant could easily hold themselves and defend themselves and have the allies and support to do so--why need each other and beckon others to join if you're not afraid of someone coming back and fighting you for it?


I have said we are neutral, and we will most likely remain that way, I just find this pact silly and it really stands no means other than to defend yourselves against us.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Gristle on November 23, 2012, 10:18:43 pm
It's kind of funny. If KUTT had remained neutral to all parties when you controlled the tundra, this thread probably wouldn't even exist.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 23, 2012, 10:29:33 pm
Im just saying its silly to have this agreement when both Teutonics and Remnant could easily hold themselves and defend themselves and have the allies and support to do so--why need each other and beckon others to join if you're not afraid of someone coming back and fighting you for it?


I have said we are neutral, and we will most likely remain that way, I just find this pact silly and it really stands no means other than to defend yourselves against us.

Actually we don't force people to join TAMDA; its an offer that is pretty good to be apart of. We aren't doing this to defend from KUTT. We are doing this for the future.  Me and Elindor like to think long term. Plain and simple just for you  :P
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on November 23, 2012, 10:40:38 pm
It's kind of funny. If KUTT had remained neutral to all parties when you controlled the tundra, this thread probably wouldn't even exist.

Strategus, the be neutral and make alliances simulator~
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 23, 2012, 11:27:56 pm
It's kind of funny. If KUTT had remained neutral to all parties when you controlled the tundra, this thread probably wouldn't even exist.

KUTT for the most part did remain Neutral. We didn't send support to Hospitallers and they didn't send any either. Our Alliance was more or less for mercenary agreements all along--the trade part and reinforcing one another never came to fruition due to wars.


I just don't want to see the Tundra turn into a big Carebear place--and that's what this Agreement is for. To have the entire Snow region be nothing but everyone holding hands and kissy-kissy is frankly stupid. In my opinion, if you have to make agreements like this, then you are weak and not self-sufficient. This is Calradia, where we war for little reason and piss upon the weak. It's not some hippy gathering where we sit in our fiefs and send love letters to one another.



Added: Due to our NAP with Remnants--IF we were to get into conflict with Teutonics, wouldn't that mean that HG and Remnant couldn't support Teutonics nor attack us due to the NAP (which was in effect before this Defense Agreement). Trying to piece together the Remnant Faction's role, or is HG going to branch off and become its own Strat Faction?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: kinngrimm on November 24, 2012, 01:10:19 am
...
Added: Due to our NAP with Remnants--IF we were to get into conflict with Teutonics, wouldn't that mean that HG and Remnant couldn't support Teutonics nor attack us due to the NAP (which was in effect before this Defense Agreement). Trying to piece together the Remnant Faction's role, or is HG going to branch off and become its own Strat Faction?
pure logic i would say yes, but in terms of diplomacy in this game, often logic is not the thing which is acted on, i would suggest both parties Remnants and Kutt should sit down together and either confirm or renegotiate the NAP.

If a NAP hasn't a ending rule, time or other condition, then normally it is called an unlimited NAP, whoever would break it would be seen as less trustworthy. Renegotiation an once given word may increase hostilities between factions, if the terms would be changed greatly.

This is just my take on it and can play out here complettly different.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Smoothrich on November 24, 2012, 01:55:09 am
death 2 alliances, betray your TAMDA brother clan today as they are planning on doing the same tomorrow

liberate the tunda from FCC tyranny
liberate the desert from FCC tyranny

the UIF isn't going to invade NA, it was here all along, and this thread is just more proof of them ruining Strategus with a horrific carebear mentality that will bore the community to death and ensure there will never be a strat 5

just say NO to TAMDA.  just say NO to FCC. 

no gods no masters no peace
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 24, 2012, 01:58:56 am
Kinngrimm I'll pm you tomorrow. And smooth; oh boy you smoothhhh
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BaleOhay on November 24, 2012, 02:21:45 am
no smoothrich? that would be better
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 02:34:49 am
@Tanken

TAMDA is a defense alliance set up to rebuild the Tundra area and thwart against invasion from unknown enemies - could be anyone.  KUTT was not specified in any of the conversations.

Im sorry if you find it carebear.  We like hot chocolate and cuddling up here.  Wesley has a beautiful singing voice.

Anyhow, there are many things afoot in Calradia, and some moves are made for reasons unseen.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Matey on November 24, 2012, 02:59:58 am
why you so full of hate smoothy? we was best buds since strat 2, we came to your aid here in 4, now you being all mean and accusatory because we are helping PartyBoy defend himself? you of all people should have known we would help him out... back in the day you woulda been right there beside us in supporting the GodKing of Partying. But now, here you are, trying to slander your ol buddies while trying to stop the parties. I suggest you and Shik leave Hero Party (cause it has PARTY in the name) and make a new factions called The Crusader Lords Against Partying, or The CLAP for short.

either that or stop being such a poopyhead.  :cry: You hurt my feelings Smooth, you hurt em bad.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on November 24, 2012, 03:02:10 am
Dracul has donned their snuggies and made their hot cocoa for further carebearing.  As the Voivode of the Dragoni of Valahia, I officially dip my pen in TAMDA's company ink.

This decision was made by a vote held between the highest level leadership at Dracul (also known as the few people who were in TS last night).
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Gristle on November 24, 2012, 03:12:29 am
horrific carebear mentality

Let's be clear here: You are saying FCC are carebears? Please elaborate (in a new thread if you would be so kind, since none of this has anything to do with the TAMDA).
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 03:41:42 am
As the Voivode of the Dragoni of Valahia, I officially dip my pen in TAMDA's company ink.

Glad to have you guys.  I will add you to the original post, but adding you to the graphic will have to wait till monday....
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Adoptagoat on November 24, 2012, 03:47:24 am
VE is happy to come in and requisition any fiefs belonging to members who refuse to join the TAMPON.  Please contact me at your convenience.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Lordark on November 24, 2012, 03:57:04 am
there is no care-baring only winners and loosers.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Weewum on November 24, 2012, 04:34:31 am
there is no care-baring only whiners and loosers.
fix'd
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 24, 2012, 04:38:20 am
there is no care-bearing only whiners and losers.

Triple Fixed.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Calford on November 24, 2012, 08:12:24 am


Care Bears TAMDA Countdown lyrics

Care Bear TAMDA Countdown, 4, 3, 2, 1
Who's that comin' from somewhere up in the sky?
Moving fast and bright as a firefly
Just when you think the trouble's gonna pounce
Who's gonna be there when it really counts?
Do the Care Bear TAMDA Countdown
And send a wish out through the air
Just do the Care Bear TAMDA Countdown
When you need them they'll be there
Don't be afraid when trouble's brewin' in your heart
If you can dream just send a wish out in the dark
And do the Care Bear's TAMDA Countdown
5, 4, 3, 2, 1


C:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 08:19:48 am
Pure gold Calford...pure gold.

Anyhow...

If I sign this treaty, does that mean I get to rape your S&D in every fief and if you attack me, everyone in the agreement has to stand on my side of the war? Cuz if so, I might be in just for shits & giggles!

 :arrow: Well, first off its not a trade agreement.

 :arrow: Second, if we're both in the agreement, and I attack you, then im OUT of the agreement since TAMDA specifically states that it acts as a non aggression pact between member factions....so yes then the remaining member factions would defend you.

 :arrow: Third - no one asked you to join - no offense meant, just fact since we didn't specifically ask ANYONE to join.  Those that see the value in it and who don't pose a problem to TAMDA are welcome.


Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Gristle on November 24, 2012, 08:30:14 am
Wouldn't stealing S&D be considered an act of aggression?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 24, 2012, 04:08:11 pm
But Elindor, you haven't answered my main question:

If I were to be apart of TAMDA, and attack someone other than Remnant Faction in the Tundra--you wouldn't be able to defend them or support them due to our NAP, am I right? Refer to Kinngrimm's post as well.


Just trying to run through the possibilities and see how you handle them and if you stick to the NAP.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Calford on November 24, 2012, 06:37:14 pm
 party A,  B and C are in the Tamda act.
 
If A attacked C, B would come to the aid of C.
Also A would be removed from the act for breaking the agreement by attacking C
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 24, 2012, 06:44:33 pm
Yet our NAP would be in agreement before the TAMDA and Remnants would be expected to honor it.


Nonetheless, I will be joining the TAMDA, though I request a different font that makes my signature look like chicken scratch!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on November 24, 2012, 07:44:20 pm
Yet our NAP would be in agreement before the TAMDA and Remnants would be expected to honor it.


Nonetheless, I will be joining the TAMDA, though I request a different font that makes my signature look like chicken scratch!

Yeah member factions ha not yet been updated it looks like.  Dracul and KUTT.  What are Ildist and Mates and Free Peasants of Fisdnar doing??
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 07:48:40 pm
Yet our NAP would be in agreement before the TAMDA and Remnants would be expected to honor it.


Nonetheless, I will be joining the TAMDA, though I request a different font that makes my signature look like chicken scratch!

Im not going to get into the nitty gritty of if-then's :)
If you wanna attack someone, do it, and we'll see what Sauce and Keshian decide to do....hows that? :twisted:

As for your application, as stated in the document, the existing member factions will have to discuss first.  Glad to hear you guys are on board though.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Weewum on November 24, 2012, 07:52:39 pm
Quote
Additionally, FCC has stated that they will provide assistance to any small clan in the tundra area (within the TAMDA or not) that finds itself being invaded by a hostile large clan, but they will not get involved in tundra wars between small clans.

Well, guess what? (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesupcoming#!?page=battledetail&id=1577)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 07:54:09 pm
Yeah member factions ha not yet been updated it looks like.  Dracul and KUTT.  What are Ildist and Mates and Free Peasants of Fisdnar doing??

At this moment Dracul is in and I have added that in the OP, but not to the image yet (that will happen Monday).

KUTT has mentioned they are interested but TAMDA member factions discuss before bringing in anyone so thats waiting approval.

Ildist and Mates is under discussion - they are not "technically" in the tundra. 

FPF we have extended an invitation to since they are peaceful and sexy laborers, but we have not heard an official application.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 07:55:00 pm
Well, guess what? (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesupcoming#!?page=battledetail&id=1577)

Two small clans.  FCC will not get involved, as stated.

One is in TAMDA one is not, unfortunately, cause I like Sandersson...

Wesley has approached me with an invitation for the Frisian Freedom to join TAMDA; however, we have declined at this time. Good luck to all members.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Weewum on November 24, 2012, 07:56:10 pm
I personally considered Teutonics a medium-sized clan, the Frisians are relatively new, and are already going to get massacred.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on November 24, 2012, 08:00:43 pm
Don't count us out just yet. We'll fight tooth and nail to keep what we have. However, we'll see what kind of assistance we get from anyone. It'd be nice to get some, but I won't be terribly upset if we get nothing.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 08:05:34 pm
I personally considered Teutonics a medium-sized clan, the Frisians are relatively new, and are already going to get massacred.

That choice is up to FCC.  TAMDA would not get involved because Teutonic is taking an offensive action, where TAMDA only serves as a defensive agreement against invasion for member factions.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on November 24, 2012, 08:18:08 pm
That choice is up to FCC.  TAMDA would not get involved because Teutonic is taking an offensive action, where TAMDA only serves as a defensive agreement against invasion for member factions.


Teutonic's roster lists a total of 41 members. Ours lists 10; not even all of those 10 are on Strategus. I would consider 40+ a medium-sized clan and 10 a small clan.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Matey on November 24, 2012, 08:33:03 pm

Teutonic's roster lists a total of 41 members. Ours lists 10; not even all of those 10 are on Strategus. I would consider 40+ a medium-sized clan and 10 a small clan.

where are you getting these numbers?

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfofaction&id=195

that says 13 members.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on November 24, 2012, 08:34:26 pm
Faction hall thread; could list alternates but I'm not familiar enough with them to know.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Arathian on November 24, 2012, 08:34:59 pm
where are you getting these numbers?

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfofaction&id=195

that says 13 members.

Less than half of whom are actually active, I am afraid.

Frisian guys, don't get too mad about this. I won't even kick you out if I take the fief. I just want the village really, you can move on from there.

It is just bussiness :3
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Arathian on November 24, 2012, 08:35:22 pm
Faction hall thread; could list alternates but I'm not familiar enough with them to know.

Doesn't matter one bit. People who play strat are 13 and less, not 40 something.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on November 24, 2012, 08:43:01 pm
Less than half of whom are actually active, I am afraid.

Frisian guys, don't get too mad about this. I won't even kick you out if I take the fief. I just want the village really, you can move on from there.

It is just bussiness :3

Just business, huh? Well, we'll give you the absolute shittiest time for taking our home. All your unarmed or lightly armed caravans that I've seen like jack1s? We'll attack that shit. We'll throw 200 people at the fief over and over until we take it back. We aren't looking to cut our losses and leave. We'll look for allies and we will fight you with all that we've got, admittedly a modest sum.

BRING IT YO

Edit: On a serious note, I have a question. Say Teutonic wrestles this fief from us. That's fine. Say we attack it back, will TAMDA be all over our asses, then? It is simple self-defense in my eyes. If TAMDA would attack under those circumstances, it is nothing more than a license to bully organizations or factions smaller than it. Something like TAMDA only works as advertised if the member factions are completely peaceful.

tldr; fuck the police.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Arathian on November 24, 2012, 09:53:45 pm
Just business, huh? Well, we'll give you the absolute shittiest time for taking our home. All your unarmed or lightly armed caravans that I've seen like jack1s? We'll attack that shit. We'll throw 200 people at the fief over and over until we take it back. We aren't looking to cut our losses and leave. We'll look for allies and we will fight you with all that we've got, admittedly a modest sum.

BRING IT YO

Edit: On a serious note, I have a question. Say Teutonic wrestles this fief from us. That's fine. Say we attack it back, will TAMDA be all over our asses, then? It is simple self-defense in my eyes. If TAMDA would attack under those circumstances, it is nothing more than a license to bully organizations or factions smaller than it. Something like TAMDA only works as advertised if the member factions are completely peaceful.

tldr; fuck the police.

Eh, in theory TAMDA should intervene if you attacked us.

However, in practice, TAMDA will probably only intervene if you "find allies and attack all the small caravans"

So yeah, if you lose the siege, my suggestion would be pack up and leave peacefully. I am still willing to provide you with the opportunity to do so.

edit: without taking S&D, if you do that, prepare for a vacation to the EU :3
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 24, 2012, 10:02:47 pm
Heh, I had actually sent multiple PM's to Arathian to call off the attack, but he obvs wasn't online. Sorry about this mistake... somethings don't happen nicely in Strategus.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 24, 2012, 10:04:26 pm
Sandersson, out of principle, since Tuetonic was the aggressors, I would impose that TAMDA not be involved if you retaliated.  But as was said, if you got some huge powerhouse to come with you, we might have to reconsider for sake of protecting the whole area.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on November 24, 2012, 10:15:47 pm
An interesting development. If the attack is indeed called off, we will have no need for hostilities with you. If the attack is not called off; all members of your faction are fair game for our modest warbands.

The choices are as follows: The attack will be called off and peace will exist, or the attack will not be called off and a state of war will exist. I recognize that we are not powerful enough to win a slobber-knocker fight; but we will not go quietly nor easily. We ain't nobodies bitches.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on November 24, 2012, 11:21:06 pm
The six Elder Free Peasants are still deliberating on the subject of TAMDA. Most of us have been out of town or not on very much recently, so communication has been rather slow. We will have a decision in a few days I presume.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: kinngrimm on November 24, 2012, 11:29:59 pm
Just business, huh? Well, we'll give you the absolute shittiest time for taking our home. All your unarmed or lightly armed caravans that I've seen like jack1s? We'll attack that shit. We'll throw 200 people at the fief over and over until we take it back. We aren't looking to cut our losses and leave. We'll look for allies and we will fight you with all that we've got, admittedly a modest sum.

BRING IT YO

Edit: On a serious note, I have a question. Say Teutonic wrestles this fief from us. That's fine. Say we attack it back, will TAMDA be all over our asses, then? It is simple self-defense in my eyes. If TAMDA would attack under those circumstances, it is nothing more than a license to bully organizations or factions smaller than it. Something like TAMDA only works as advertised if the member factions are completely peaceful.

tldr; fuck the police.
not sure when you took Ismiralla, but if the fief went to you befor TAMDA was created, TAMDA shouldn't be triggered. Atleast again that is what logic what logic would tell me.
On the other hand if you both can find a peacefull solution, doesn't need to be in a TAMDA agreement for not threatening others, if the parties could agree on Neutrality and stay out of each others way, then that would be a first step to friendship.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 25, 2012, 12:41:51 am
Resolved the problem with Sandersson. Although we will still fight tomorrow.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 25, 2012, 09:05:30 pm
KUTT has been admitted into the TAMDA by the three existing member factions.

---

A reminder to all factions within TAMDA (not meant for just KUTT but rather as a reminder for everyone and future applicants)....
If a member faction is deemed to be troublesome/a liability by the other member factions, that faction can be removed from the agreement.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: MURDERTRON on November 26, 2012, 02:30:03 am
Two small clans.  FCC will not get involved, as stated.

One is in TAMDA one is not, unfortunately, cause I like Sandersson...

Since its a defensive pact, the other clans should have no obligation to join in.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 26, 2012, 02:40:21 am
Since its a defensive pact, the other clans should have no obligation to join in.

I don't follow you .... only the clans that are in the defensive pact have agreed to assist each other if one of them gets attacked in this area unprovoked.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on November 26, 2012, 04:52:50 am
The Free Peasants of Fisdnar hereby accept the offer of joining the Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 26, 2012, 07:51:02 am
Glad to have you merry folk.   :wink:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 26, 2012, 03:03:51 pm
To all TAMDA members; we should set up a meeting in ts once a week to make sure everyone is organized, up to date, and keep track of our trade runs.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Ethgar on November 26, 2012, 03:35:53 pm
Good luck with the Agreement everyone.   Wish you the best
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 26, 2012, 04:11:04 pm
To all TAMDA members; we should set up a meeting in ts once a week to make sure everyone is organized, up to date, and keep track of our trade runs.

For now lets just have each main contact get each other's STEAM. 

I need your steam Arys, I have all the others.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on November 26, 2012, 05:02:19 pm
** Original Post (and Agreement image) Updated **
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on November 26, 2012, 05:45:53 pm
I'll make a steam group tonight. And btw nice logos and signatures.  8-)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on November 26, 2012, 05:55:50 pm
Close enough. :]
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Hobb on November 26, 2012, 06:01:59 pm
Kesh ANNNNNDDD Smoothrich are muted, now we have to rely on these swingin' dicks to provide us our drama :(
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on December 04, 2012, 10:29:52 pm
Sorry to revive this thread from the 2nd Page, but I want to specify.

Even though KUTT is no longer a formal faction--we are still united in strategus and those still within our Faction and under our leadership will continue to support TAMDA and assist with any decisions made. This is said to clarify any misconceptions people may have as to where we stand. We are still standing by our word, though we no longer wear the banner of KUTT.


Thank you.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Miley on December 05, 2012, 04:39:24 am
Looks like Elindor is the John Hancock of this bunch.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on December 05, 2012, 07:23:06 am
Sorry to revive this thread from the 2nd Page, but I want to specify.

Even though KUTT is no longer a formal faction--we are still united in strategus and those still within our Faction and under our leadership will continue to support TAMDA and assist with any decisions made. This is said to clarify any misconceptions people may have as to where we stand. We are still standing by our word, though we no longer wear the banner of KUTT.


Thank you.

Let me know what you change to so I can put that in there instead.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 19, 2013, 07:35:40 pm
Attention Hospitaller and TKoV (since it is known you have many troops in the area now)...

In regards to this : http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesupcoming#!?page=battledetail&id=2032

The TAMDA is watching your actions in the SW corner of the Tundra...and the MEMBER FACTIONS of TAMDA will not sit idly by if it is seen that you are moving aggressively against any member or holding of the Tundra area.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 19, 2013, 07:46:27 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login



But aside from the good Meet the Fockers reference, can we get a screenshot of where the Attack is taking place so others can pass judgement based on if it was in Tundra or Not. Not wanting to defend either side's stance atm, but you guys -are- still apart of Remnant Faction (afaik) and TKoV and Hosps are working to push them out of their territory.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Aztek on January 19, 2013, 07:46:50 pm
^^^^

You do realize that was our our castle right? That is why Hospitaller are near by, And you have been helping Remnant which Tkov was attacking, so are you really surprised?

You cant be aggressive towards another and then play victim when they fight back.


lol @ Tank.. Loved that movie.... And please for gods sake KILL THAT AVATAR! It makes my eyes bleed!!!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on January 19, 2013, 08:06:35 pm
TAMDA is FCC as far as hero_party is considered anyway. Good fights to all~
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 19, 2013, 08:08:40 pm
TAMDA is FCC as far as hero_party is considered anyway.

Well it is. Teutonics = FCC buddies after they turned on KUTT to get some easy fiefs. HG = Remnant vassals and Remnant = FCC Vassals.

Free Peasants = Wild Card but guessing they're pro-FCC.

And Frisia = Pro-FCC/Vassals as well. Oh and Dracul Pro-FCC as well/vassals.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on January 19, 2013, 08:12:25 pm
Well it is. Teutonics = FCC buddies after they turned on KUTT to get some easy fiefs. HG = Remnant vassals and Remnant = FCC Vassals.

Free Peasants = Wild Card but guessing they're pro-FCC.

And Frisia = Pro-FCC/Vassals as well. Oh and Dracul Pro-FCC as well/vassals.

Wow - you guys are clueless. lulz.

By that same logic - Hero_party are vssals of Occitan and Hospitallers. Hospitallers attacked them and they bitched out and became vassals because too scared to stand alone.  Then they got the villages in the Eastern desert for their other liege lord Occitan, who attacked the main city themselves - not trusting hero party to be capable of doing it.  And of course since occitan is still technically part of the UIF you are all really vassals of DRZ.


Lets get some more twisted idiotic logic in this thread, because the previous 2 posts almost dont have enough.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: kinngrimm on January 19, 2013, 08:20:20 pm
I would suggest to get confirmation if the Defense pact actually triggers if a TAMDA member goes into war and then gets counterattacked or if it always counts at the time a TAMDA fief or party within Tundra gets attacked.

The war between those parties is going on for a while now, so claiming now that the Defense Pact is being triggered without a fief getting attacked which was in the claims of those TAMDA members at the time the treaty was made is a bit thin.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 19, 2013, 08:41:17 pm
I would suggest to get confirmation if the Defense pact actually triggers if a TAMDA member goes into war and then gets counterattacked or if it always counts at the time a TAMDA fief or party within Tundra gets attacked.

The war between those parties is going on for a while now, so claiming now that the Defense Pact is being triggered without a fief getting attacked which was in the claims of those TAMDA members at the time the treaty was made is a bit thin.

I see where you're coming from, and I believe I asked a similar question before joining TAMDA. The way I understand it is that if war should enter the Tundra, the factions would sanction together to keep it from spreading and attempt to contain it, if not all together extinguish it. Given the circumstances that HG is apart of Remnant Faction, they somewhat inherit their Father's war, and given that Remnant has made it clear they aren't apart of TAMDA, yet HG is, it leaves me scratching my head as well.

It would be easier for HG if they separated from Remnant Faction and created their own, they're big enough to do so now, and hopefully active enough. But I think that's what's happening here, inherently getting attacked based on Faction association, not so much the clan itself. And thus, if that's the case, does TAMDA in fact cover it since it's not so much an attack directed to HG, as it is directed at Remnant?


Food for thought.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 19, 2013, 08:59:02 pm
LET ME EXPLAIN BETTER : THIS attack against Hindel is not in the TAMDA area and we know Sungetche itself belonged to Hosp originally...so TAMDA does not come into play here.

 :arrow: HOWEVER _ the point is, TAMDA is watching, and aggressive movement INTO the tundra against TAMDA Members or holdings will not be taken lightly.


Make more sense now?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 19, 2013, 09:09:46 pm
LET ME EXPLAIN BETTER : THIS attack against Hindel is not in the TAMDA area and we know Sungetche itself belonged to Hosp originally...so TAMDA does not come into play here.

 :arrow: HOWEVER _ the point is, TAMDA is watching, and aggressive movement INTO the tundra against TAMDA Members or holdings will not be taken lightly.


Make more sense now?

I'm not sure i still understand. Explain some more please.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 19, 2013, 09:10:59 pm
I'm not sure i still understand. Explain some more please.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: partyboy on January 19, 2013, 09:30:48 pm
Why would anyone want to own a tundra?  Nothing but snow.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 19, 2013, 09:36:28 pm
Why would anyone want to own a tundra?  Nothing but snow.

Therein lies your answer...


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Rikthor on January 19, 2013, 10:40:24 pm
As history has shown us, there are certain things you should consider when deciding to settle in the north

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on January 19, 2013, 11:25:12 pm
Well it is. Teutonics = FCC buddies after they turned on KUTT to get some easy fiefs. HG = Remnant vassals and Remnant = FCC Vassals.

Free Peasants = Wild Card but guessing they're drunk and masturbating.

And Frisia = Pro-FCC/Vassals as well. Oh and Dracul Pro-FCC as well/vassals.

Fixed that for you.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BaleOhay on January 20, 2013, 01:24:28 am
FCC has no vassals. All those clans named are sovereign unto themselves
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on January 20, 2013, 01:39:47 am
Well it is. Teutonics = FCC buddies after they turned on KUTT to get some easy fiefs. HG = Remnant vassals and Remnant = FCC Vassals.

Free Peasants = Wild Card but guessing they're pro-FCC.

And Frisia = Pro-FCC/Vassals as well. Oh and Dracul Pro-FCC as well/vassals.

Hero Party forgot one important detail; Frisia has nothing to do with the TAMDA. We are a neutral faction. We give just as many benefits to Hospitaller as we do FCC when it comes to our actions on Strategus (mercenary work aside). Even then we only help FCC mercenary-wise because they have given us more reason to. We don't inherently like either faction more and we certainly are far from a vassal of any faction. I'm not going to list those actions for either faction because I believe each faction wishes them to remain secret. We're just looking out for own best interest while warring factions go at each other.

The only faction we had any form of non-neutral status towards was JABONRA because they attacked our trader and never issued an apology or tried to make amends. At this point though we're cool with the JABONRA guys simply because we like them in cRPG. We never disliked them in the first place but just saw it as an opportunity to treat Strategus as something other then "STRATEGUS: BEST VIDEO GAME WAITING SIMULATOR: 2013" since they gave us a reason for fighting.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on January 20, 2013, 01:46:55 am
Oh and Dracul Pro-FCC as well/vassals.

We're involved with TAMDA, and we're good friends with BIRD CLAN, but we have no real affiliation with FCC other than a standard trade agreement.  We merc for them because they helped us get a home (twice now), and we've just always been generally friendly.  Everything we've ever done though this strat (and in the past strats) has been done independently and as a sovereign faction.

But I mean, HP must be vassals of Hospitaller because they merc for them at every battle and support them on the forums.  Same thing with Occitan, right?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 20, 2013, 02:01:19 am
We're involved with TAMDA, and we're good friends with BIRD CLAN, but we have no real affiliation with FCC other than a standard trade agreement.  We merc for them because they helped us get a home (twice now), and we've just always been generally friendly.  Everything we've ever done though this strat (and in the past strats) has been done independently and as a sovereign faction.

But I mean, HP must be vassals of Hospitaller because they merc for them at every battle and support them on the forums.  Same thing with Occitan, right?

There's a difference between being vassals and alliances/pacts whatevers. Most ones i mentioned are small/pretty small clans who'd get wiped in less than 2 day. Possible FCC vassals. In any case it doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 20, 2013, 02:03:09 am
Hero Party forgot one important detail; Frisia has nothing to do with the TAMDA. We are a neutral faction. We give just as many benefits to Hospitaller as we do FCC when it comes to our actions on Strategus (mercenary work aside). Even then we only help FCC mercenary-wise because they have given us more reason to. We don't inherently like either faction more and we certainly are far from a vassal of any faction. I'm not going to list those actions for either faction because I believe each faction wishes them to remain secret. We're just looking out for own best interest while warring factions go at each other.

The only faction we had any form of non-neutral status towards was JABONRA because they attacked our trader and never issued an apology or tried to make amends. At this point though we're cool with the JABONRA guys simply because we like them in cRPG. We never disliked them in the first place but just saw it as an opportunity to treat Strategus as something other then "STRATEGUS: BEST VIDEO GAME WAITING SIMULATOR: 2013" since they gave us a reason for fighting.

As head nerd of Frisia, Daruvian pretty much nailed it here.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: arowaine on January 20, 2013, 02:46:21 am

But I mean, HP must be vassals of Hospitaller because they merc for them at every battle and support them on the forums.  Same thing with Occitan, right?

correction for you hospitaller fougth hero party at the begining of strat before everyone decide to gang bang them. A while after, when fcc decide to roll and get all cocky on hospitaller, they had to get some kind of deal with remnant cause they were not able to take them out by themself. Hero party decide to help hospitaller super simple....still they havent give anything except merc :)

As occitan well the choice is just simple.1 side being nice to us, sold us 1 castle and 1 village when we got back on Na and well the other side... one person keep being a asshole to us on the forum, saying shit about us calling us the worst clan of crpg etc etc...why should we be good to someone like that tell me pls ?

pw: we arent occitan anymore we are les chevaliers occitan sir thanks you
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tom Cruise on January 20, 2013, 02:53:59 am
FCC made no deal with us to attack Hospitaller...
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 20, 2013, 03:07:19 am
Well I don't like you hero_party guys either.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Rhalzo on January 20, 2013, 03:11:57 am
Well I don't like you hero_party guys either.

(click to show/hide)

This is by far the best post that I've seen in this thread so far. Completely straight forward and on topic throughout. I commend you sir.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on January 20, 2013, 03:40:37 am
correction for you hospitaller fougth hero party at the begining of strat before everyone decide to gang bang them. A while after, when fcc decide to roll and get all cocky on hospitaller, they had to get some kind of deal with remnant cause they were not able to take them out by themself. Hero party decide to help hospitaller super simple....still they havent give anything except merc :)

Indeed, but the enemy of my enemy is my friend, they do seem to be cooperating and Smoothrich even said so himself.

pw: we arent occitan anymore we are les chevaliers occitan sir thanks you

And for that, I apologize, I know I hate it when people give my clan name an improper use.

I was using your clan as an example, according to Berenger's logic (troll logic), because a few clans are friendly with FCC, they are vassals of FCC.  Then the same rule applies to Occitan, you guys are friendly with Hospitaller so you must be vassals of them, right?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Smoothrich on January 20, 2013, 05:36:00 pm
The difference is Kesh draws up the plans and orders you people around directly, much as he did with BIRD clan, as our BIRD traitors who joined Hero Party would confirm repeatedly and with much annoyance.

We see TAMDA has nothing but a gimmick to guard FCC's western flank so they can carry out aggressive attacks wherever they please on the rest of the map.

Ironically FCC said they would make sure any large clan would not be able to get involved and support a side in any medium-small factions fighting wars in the north, to make the game fair.

Then when a war of that nature breaks out in the south, FCC immediately sents 6 thousand shiny troops within a day to attack Hero Party and anyone remotely allied, threatening to wipe out any clans who took BIRD clan fiefs.  Even though it was just a war between two goon clans that he had no part of.

TAMDA is hypocricy at its finest, and a complete sham.  FCC probably are full of contigency plans to wipe out and replace any small clans in the area who begin to falter and replace them with bigger ones, so they always have a buffer on their west flank.  Much how H1tler would treat Poland.  Once they lost usefulness, the Fuhrer will take what he pleases, while ordering everyone around like an overbearing, micromanaging madman who will ultimately get his side wiped out of the game.

As the wars turn less into easy stomps and alliances form to stop the out of control madman, its no surprise that, much like the SS began going into full blown genocide with the Holocaust, FCC have turned into multi-accounting on an unprecedented scale to continue having a massive economic advantage.  Its uncivilized and rather disturbing.

When will these FCC war crimes end?  When we've all had enough of Emperor Kesh the Spergful IV, when the chorus of "-1 this racist post" deafen our ears, when the awful shitposting binds shut our eyes, and when we open our minds to a new tomorrow, a new FCC, a new Strategus.. a new day.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BaleOhay on January 20, 2013, 05:43:57 pm
Smooth the number of things untrue in your post is legion.

I am not going to bother listing them because Hero party does not care about posting anything truthful so it would be a complete waste of time.

At this point we just want the battles that these childish rants suggest are going to happen.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 20, 2013, 05:57:51 pm
When we've all had enough of Emperor Kesh the Spergful IV, when the chorus of "-1 this racist post" deafen our ears, when the awful shitposting binds shut our eyes, and when we open our minds to a new tomorrow, a new FCC, a new Strategus.. a new day.

Oh my god. You're telling me there have been more than 1? Ugh
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: MURDERTRON on January 20, 2013, 06:11:03 pm
The difference is Kesh draws up the plans and orders you people around directly, much as he did with BIRD clan, as our BIRD traitors who joined Hero Party would confirm repeatedly and with much annoyance.

We see TAMDA has nothing but a gimmick to guard FCC's western flank so they can carry out aggressive attacks wherever they please on the rest of the map.

Ironically FCC said they would make sure any large clan would not be able to get involved and support a side in any medium-small factions fighting wars in the north, to make the game fair.

Then when a war of that nature breaks out in the south, FCC immediately sents 6 thousand shiny troops within a day to attack Hero Party and anyone remotely allied, threatening to wipe out any clans who took BIRD clan fiefs.  Even though it was just a war between two goon clans that he had no part of.

TAMDA is hypocricy at its finest, and a complete sham.  FCC probably are full of contigency plans to wipe out and replace any small clans in the area who begin to falter and replace them with bigger ones, so they always have a buffer on their west flank.  Much how H1tler would treat Poland.  Once they lost usefulness, the Fuhrer will take what he pleases, while ordering everyone around like an overbearing, micromanaging madman who will ultimately get his side wiped out of the game.

As the wars turn less into easy stomps and alliances form to stop the out of control madman, its no surprise that, much like the SS began going into full blown genocide with the Holocaust, FCC have turned into multi-accounting on an unprecedented scale to continue having a massive economic advantage.  Its uncivilized and rather disturbing.

When will these FCC war crimes end?  When we've all had enough of Emperor Kesh the Spergful IV, when the chorus of "-1 this racist post" deafen our ears, when the awful shitposting binds shut our eyes, and when we open our minds to a new tomorrow, a new FCC, a new Strategus.. a new day.

Please remove all references of FCC.  That clan is dead.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Smoothrich on January 20, 2013, 06:14:59 pm
Please remove all references of FCC.  That clan is dead.

I didn't notice FCC members are impersonating ATS by using their tag and changing colors.  If any ATS complain, I'll have to start handing out bans until this is rectified.  This will be the only warning.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on January 20, 2013, 06:19:40 pm
I didn't notice FCC members are impersonating ATS by using their tag and changing colors.  If any ATS complain, I'll have to start handing out bans until this is rectified.  This will be the only warning.

I don't think you understand, they're reforming the great clan of ATS to rebuild the great NORTHERN EMPIRE.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Smoothrich on January 20, 2013, 06:45:17 pm
I don't think you understand, they're reforming the great clan of ATS to rebuild the great NORTHERN EMPIRE.

That's dishonest, unfunny trolling, and impersonating other factions and their members is simply not allowed. 

ATS is still around and I play with several of their members on a regular basis.  I will see if they feel any further action is required here.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tom Cruise on January 20, 2013, 06:46:31 pm
(click to show/hide)

This is honestly getting ridiculous of how you are trying to attack Kesh is this. TAMDA is to protect everyone in the tundra, not just FCC. FCC barely even has a presence in the tundra. Us and Teutonic own most of the fiefs there. The reason this was created is to protect the smaller clans in the tundra. Remnant is nearly nothing it used to be. We are down to about 5-8 active Remnant + the HG guys which only number about the same. Teutonic I'm sure is not much bigger then us either if not smaller. Dracul only owns one fief and has like what 5 active members? (not sure on the count, sorry Artyem :P). And the Free Peasant are off getting drunk some where and Arys if off fucking his horse Betsy.

So how can we compare to all of these big alliances? We dont. We are nothing compared to alliances such as the VE, or Hosp and HP. We dont own nearly as much land or have nearly members and resources. TAMDA is a defensive pact only. For example. Remnant attacking Hosp does not activate the TAMDA because we we're the aggressors. This goes for anyone else in TAMDA who starts a war with someone.

FCC is not the "supreme overlord" of anyone or anything. FCC is doing there own thing attacking Hosp. We are in no way aiding them in the war besides merc. We have given them no troops, gold, or gear at any point. This is in no way being used to safe guard FCC at all. It is strategically beneficial to all of the smaller clans in the tundra. Simple as that. No stupid little conspiracy with FCC to make it easy for them and to take over everything. The government did not plan 9/11. Aliens did not build the pyramids.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on January 20, 2013, 07:13:39 pm
It can be easily summed up.  hero party doesn't have the balls to attack us, so theya re pretending all these other tiny clans are somehow vassals of FCC so they can pretend they are beating us by attacking clans 1/10 their size, just like they did with BIRD clan.  Them and Occitan and Hospitallers know they couldn't take Tilbaut castle (the closest fief to them) if their lives depended on it so they instead are bullying on clans that have nothing to do with our faction other than occasionally mercing for us mostly because I ask them and the other side doesn't.

Considering how much hate they have been spewing against FCC, its kind of sad that its been a month and they still haven't attacked us and now it sounds like they are going after other clans.  Pretty cowardly.  but what do you expect from a clan led by Smoothrich, badplayer, blackzilla and shik.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tom Cruise on January 20, 2013, 07:22:33 pm
No kesh. Everyone stop trolling this thread. Trolling on both sides from FCC and HP. Its pathetic. Everyone stop flexing your internet muscles at every chance you guys get. All I am trying to do is clear up the TAMDA. Thats all this thread should be for.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Smoothrich on January 20, 2013, 07:37:10 pm
No kesh. Everyone stop trolling this thread. Trolling on both sides from FCC and HP. Its pathetic. Everyone stop flexing your internet muscles at every chance you guys get. All I am trying to do is clear up the TAMDA. Thats all this thread should be for.

I already clarified it for people who weren't sure, I don't think much else is necessary.  Its merely an FCC mandated buffer state that replaced KUTT with clans who were anti Hospitallers, so they could safely fight smaller clans across the map without any risk.  Nothing else.  All actions by clans within are pre-approved by Kesh, or created by him, due to his meticulous need for dominating clans and microing them.  This behavior made half of BIRD clan stop playing, I imagine much the same is happening for Remnants and other clans pulled into the web.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tom Cruise on January 20, 2013, 07:48:56 pm
I already clarified it for people who weren't sure, I don't think much else is necessary.  Its merely an FCC mandated buffer state that replaced KUTT with clans who were anti Hospitallers, so they could safely fight smaller clans across the map without any risk.  Nothing else.  All actions by clans within are pre-approved by Kesh, or created by him, due to his meticulous need for dominating clans and microing them.  This behavior made half of BIRD clan stop playing, I imagine much the same is happening for Remnants and other clans pulled into the web.

Notice how the thread was started by Elindor? Leader of the HG? Kesh had nothing to do with the forming of the contract except his agreement parts. Kesh is not the architect of it in anyway. The idea of the TAMDA was created by Sauce and was relayed to everyone else throuhg us. And I don't think you should talk about making other quit playing when you have done your fair share in it.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on January 20, 2013, 07:49:54 pm
Kesh commands every battle he's in for "TAMDA" factions, much to the displeasure of some people in those factions I hear.
Quote
Soldiers! Don't give yourselves to Kesh!, a man who despises you and enslaves you; who regiments your lives, tells you what to do, what to think and what to feel! Who drills you, diets you, treats you like cattle, uses you as cannon fodder!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Equal on January 20, 2013, 07:53:42 pm
Kesh commands every battle he's in for "TAMDA" factions, much to the displeasure of some people in those factions I hear.
That's weird because I hear that I've never heard that ever, I hear.
Title: Axis of Evil
Post by: LordBerenger on January 20, 2013, 08:09:49 pm
Before i left BIRD Clan (ex-LLJK) i saw that poor poor Partyboy who was once a happy and cheerful guy had been chained with shackles by evil FCC and, as time went by FCC got more and more influence over BIRD Clan.

They were using BIRD Clan as proxy soldiers to weaken down Hero Party so that they could eventually proceed with their invasion of the desert which they labeled as ''Operation: Birdtaster''.

As time went by even more they started to be in full control of BIRD Clan, (ex-LLJK) who once fought off countless factions who had conspired against them alone but now were finally under the oppression of 'Grand Wizard Kesh''.

Racism were spreading whilst FCC was in control of BIRD Clan and talking about anti-racism got them to be mad at you.

The only thing that was encouraged was support for homosexuality which they all preached but nothing against anti-racism.

I forgot who it was but one FCC member said ''Anti-Racism is a Code Word for Anti-White''.

Eventually i left because i couldn't take it anymore and what once was a independent faction were selling off fiefs and constantly shrinking whilst being guided/run by the inferior and not so tactical mind of Kesh.

Kesh is very manipulative and there's only a matter of time before Teutonics, Dracul, Frisian and any other small clans who just wants to play strat and have some fun gets incorporated into the bigger evil racist FCC empire.


I URGE YOU ALL TO STAND UP AGAINST YOUR ''MASTERS'' AND FIGHT! STAND UP AND FIGHT AGAINST THEM FOR NOW IS THE TIME FOR A REVOLUTION!


VIVA LA RÉSISTANCE!

Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on January 20, 2013, 08:21:54 pm
Lol wow, i don't even need to say anything, the last post was so full of stupidity it proves its opposite without any help from me.  Bravo, Bravo.


P.S. yeah sorry guys for posting this in your thread, TAMDA has nothing to do with FCC other than us helping out if a large clan tries to beat up smaller clans in the area like Hero party did to bird clan in the desert.  I shouldn't even respond to their stupidity, i mean does anyone take hero party seriously anymore after Smoothrich took over from Tydeus and dominates and tells everyone what to do like a dictator with his cronies shik and badplayer and berenger as he rages against FCC while trying to only fight small faction and running away in terror from the actual FCC.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 20, 2013, 08:48:18 pm
I already clarified it for people who weren't sure, I don't think much else is necessary.  Its merely an FCC mandated buffer state that replaced KUTT with clans who were anti Hospitallers, so they could safely fight smaller clans across the map without any risk.  Nothing else.  All actions by clans within are pre-approved by Kesh, or created by him, due to his meticulous need for dominating clans and microing them.  This behavior made half of BIRD clan stop playing, I imagine much the same is happening for Remnants and other clans pulled into the web.

This is odd to hear, for I don't even think Kesh and I have ever spoken to each other. The closest i've gotten to the fellow was through the +/-. The Free Peasants control TAMDA, good sir, your facts are wrong. We all gather in the slum of Uslum and have a merry gang bang of any war goat, sumpter horse, half-bear-men, sheep, or whench you can grab, then whilst in the process of fornication we discuss the future of the tundra. Or maybe that dark figure on the throne overlooking Uslum was Kesh all along.......
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Mae. on January 20, 2013, 08:55:44 pm
Kesh is great at leading battles in my opinion. 1600 vs 200 with his help was well played. Thanks again buddy :3
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Chestaclese on January 20, 2013, 09:20:49 pm
Lets all just agree that Kutt got their asses handed to them. Their fall from the game was spectacular.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on January 20, 2013, 09:43:22 pm
Lets all just agree that Kutt got their asses handed to them. Their fall from the game was spectacular.
How the hell did I miss it...
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: SHinOCk on January 20, 2013, 10:14:17 pm
In the end, were all vassals of the UIF
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 20, 2013, 10:26:16 pm
Lets all just agree that Kutt got their asses handed to them. Their fall from the game was spectacular.

Agreed, I was in the siege for Reyvadin that Tanken thought was going to be quite close to Stalingrad when it ended up being more like Belgium. Hell, I thought we'd have a better time of it too, but the attackers really chose their mercs well. After Reyvadin fell, KUTT really just fell apart. Head taken off the snake, so to speak. It's worth noting that they hard FAR fewer active members than suspected and implied by the attackers. I know this; I merc'd for KUTT heavily during this period. That's right, I actually fought against my FCC overlords, though I shudder to remember such dark and chaotic times.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 21, 2013, 04:13:28 am
What happened here?   :shock:  :rolleyes:

:arrow:  TAMDA is a defensive pact of small clans in the Tundra which was inspired by Sauce and carried out by myself, Remnant, and Teutonic (with others following afterwards).  As Tom said, the TAMDA does not protect aggressors - in the case of Sungetche, since Remnant TOOK it from Hospitaller, the TAMDA is not pledged to get involved as Hosp tries to regain it.  If Hosp continued into TAMDA lands and went offensive past regaining Sungetche, then TAMDA would get involved - which was my latest reminder.

:arrow:  Kesh, upon learning of the agreement, pledged his support of the agreement without signing his faction into it as a member faction.  This was not solicited but I dont know of anyone who isnt in favor of it.

Good day kind sirs, please find elsewhere to traffic your dribble.  8-)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 21, 2013, 04:38:43 am
Lets all just agree that Kutt got their asses handed to them. Their fall from the game was spectacular.

Much the same way Remnant is getting manhandled at the moment, wouldn't you say?
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Chestaclese on January 21, 2013, 04:56:25 am
Much the same way Remnant is getting manhandled at the moment, wouldn't you say?
(click to show/hide)

I wouldn't.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 21, 2013, 07:06:34 am
Much the same way Remnant is getting manhandled at the moment, wouldn't you say?
(click to show/hide)

Don't mind Chesty - he's off his meds  :o
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: kinngrimm on January 21, 2013, 07:14:45 am
....  If Hosp continued into TAMDA lands and went offensive past regaining Sungetche, then TAMDA would get involved - ...

So if someone out of TAMDA partners goes into war with another faction, and they fail to take them out on their lands, that war does not only backfires onto the original agressor but all TAMDA partners ?

Dudes i would never do such a treaty ^^ if someone wants to play with fire sure, but don't burn down my house.
A Defense Pact is triggered normally by declaration or act of war from the outside onto a Defense Pact Member, i have not yet seen anything in the orignal treaty which would have triggered such a case.

a) there wouldn't be an invasion but a counter attack onto a former invader.
b) The intial war was already there before TAMDA was founded, that the ongoing war would be also be part of this would have needed to be in a separate paragraph
c) As Remantns were contracted through FCC to wage war onto Hospitaller, and gained some of their fiefs because of that i believe, it is very arguable if TAMDA members should in case they help Remnants not also be paid in a similar way as they indirectly would help Remnants with such a contract.( i also read a while back, that that contract is still ongoing is that right?)

I would find such a Pact but quite intriguing and thought about such a thing myself, but i am not sure that people are actually aware of the implications such a treaty brings along, the Defense Pact would switch in case of a certain territorial aspect, into a full alliance treaty, indirectly triggered by anyone who choses to be an agressor!
But it should be made more clear, by naming it in such a way.

On the other hand, if Remnants, after loosing the fiefs which are not part of Tundra or gained through warfare, would decide to make peace with Hospitallers and vice versa, then there would not be a reason for TAMDA to act at all.
After all a Defense Pact is about stability and securing and also in a sense calming folks down.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: MURDERTRON on January 21, 2013, 07:49:00 am
Stuff about purely robotic behavior.

So what you're saying is FCC should invade the Tundra and then be forced to fight themselves, right?  Because I agree.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: kinngrimm on January 21, 2013, 07:59:06 am
So what you're saying is FCC should invade the Tundra and then be forced to fight themselves, right?  Because I agree.
What i was saying i said, what you said i don't quite understand please explain, perhaps then i can answer your question.

If i but should guess ^^
You want to attack Tunrda and then fight yourself, that was what you were suggesting right?
Well if you want to do so it is totally upto you, i have seen worse wars. Could be fun, but was done already, i think LLJK in last strategus has had some upheaval or was it 2.0? I quite liked the fun nature of that back then.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on January 21, 2013, 11:02:56 am
On a side note, Smoothrich is muted again, pro admin skills right there.

So, at this point it's safe to say that he's been muted so many times that if he weren't an admin, he'd have been banned ages ago for the type of bullshit he posts.  Anything Spookisland said was mild compared to some of the shit Smoothrich goes on about.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 21, 2013, 12:50:34 pm
You know, smoothrich really had my personal ire (scary thought, I know, 2edgy4yall) until a couple days ago. He's really earned my respect as a man who simply fails to give more than half a fuck at a time. While badplayer really kinda just trolls in an attempt to get us pissed (which made me chuckle a lot less, but still some! I really do love these forums, they give me some good times), smoothrich is SPECIAL.

Plus, he's a champion of the poor aborted before birth Conquest Mode that would probably fix everything.


On a side note, Smoothrich is muted again, pro admin skills right there.

So, at this point it's safe to say that he's been muted so many times that if he weren't an admin, he'd have been banned ages ago for the type of bullshit he posts.  Anything Spookisland said was mild compared to some of the shit Smoothrich goes on about.

I guess that he shouldn't do that stuff while he's an admin sure, but since it's funny, I figure he gets a free by. Also, are you seriously implying right now that spook shouldn't be immediately unbanned?

(click to show/hide)

Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 21, 2013, 01:01:44 pm
You're just delaying the inevitable. Surrender now and mercy will be shown and you will be spared!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Keshian on January 21, 2013, 01:53:37 pm

c) As Remantns were contracted through FCC to wage war onto Hospitaller, and gained some of their fiefs because of that i believe, it is very arguable if TAMDA members should in case they help Remnants not also be paid in a similar way as they indirectly would help Remnants with such a contract.( i also read a while back, that that contract is still ongoing is that right?)


Mis information.  We found out about Remnant attacking Hospitallers when they were already on their way to attack.  Wasn't a contract of any kind.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on January 21, 2013, 02:39:55 pm
 The idea was brought up by Sauce my ass! If I never went to HG/Sauce, an alliance wouldn't exist. Sure Sauce is a good boss but why does he have to approve before HG can make a move. The chains are tight. As for FCC we are very good allies but no vassel. When FCC members bash Jason, I tell them Teutonic would switch to the french side. TAMDA is only controlled by the people within. The people within TAMDA are small. All this talk about protecting FCC's flank wasnt planned, It so happened to turn out that way. For a pact that has done nothing it sure the hell is popular. I do not know why Teutonic is in this pact. I wanted to form this alliance because we were weak when we set up our fiefs... Most of the time I choose to ignore this thread. Today is the day Teutonic is on their own.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 21, 2013, 04:53:56 pm
The idea was brought up by Sauce my ass! If I never went to HG/Sauce, an alliance wouldn't exist. Sure Sauce is a good boss but why does he have to approve before HG can make a move. The chains are tight. As for FCC we are very good allies but no vassel. When FCC members bash Jason, I tell them Teutonic would switch to the french side. TAMDA is only controlled by the people within. The people within TAMDA are small. All this talk about protecting FCC's flank wasnt planned, It so happened to turn out that way. For a pact that has done nothing it sure the hell is popular. I do not know why Teutonic is in this pact. I wanted to form this alliance because we were weak when we set up our fiefs... Most of the time I choose to ignore this thread. Today is the day Teutonic is on their own.

 :arrow: Are you saying you are out of the TAMDA?

And, maybe I mispoke, you AND Sauce came to me about TAMDA, I didn't know what happened before that, apparently it was your idea.

And as for our ties to Remnant, we operate as a part of Remnant in Strat for a couple reasons, that's why I get their approval before doing major things. 
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sauce on January 21, 2013, 04:58:42 pm
Teutonic keeping at least one contract might be too much to ask. Unfortunately, this is the stuff that gets carried over into other strats.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Aztek on January 21, 2013, 05:21:06 pm
.....
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on January 21, 2013, 05:59:53 pm
You may be disappointed Sauce, but the choice of leaving TAMDA opens doors for Teutonic. I dont want to burst your bubble but I'm not going to get dragged down with Remnant.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 21, 2013, 06:27:01 pm
Updated - removed Teutonic
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 21, 2013, 08:19:36 pm
Teutonics betraying their word because the tables have slightly shifted?

Color me shocked.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Lt_Anders on January 21, 2013, 08:25:51 pm
You may be disappointed Sauce, but the choice of leaving TAMDA opens doors for Teutonic. I dont want to burst your bubble but I'm not going to get dragged down with Remnant.

Lawl keep to tamda while it supports your interests and throw it away the moment you might get beat.

Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on January 21, 2013, 08:35:41 pm
Not betraying my word. Gave a reason to leave. Betraying my word would be us not helping if someone like HG got attacked if we were still in TAMDA. Whats done is done. It's funny how you still like to pick on us. You can and will not get over yourself about KUTT. I do feel sorry for you Sir Tanken. I made our strat color purple in honor of you. Now you and Tugboat use FCC TS and don't even have to balls the say hello. Cowards indeed. I could go on a rant all day but to be honest you're wasting my time. Cheers Tanken.

Oh Anders, the guy who wanted to make his castle a free trade place. Pretty useless. Are you still on the map?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sauce on January 21, 2013, 08:41:22 pm
Remnant, and our ongoing wars with half the map, have nothing to do with the TAMDA. It was intended so that smaller clans such as Dracul could find some sort of defense against larger invaders.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Lt_Anders on January 21, 2013, 08:45:13 pm
Quote
Oh Anders, the guy who wanted to make his castle a free trade place. Pretty useless. Are you still on the map?
Yes actually.

I must say, for a guy who primarily does everything himself, I've done damn good job at it. No betrayals, no alliances, 2 merc contracts and tons of people who just come to sell at my fief because they don't have to jump through hoops to do it. I accomplished everything I've ever wanted, and it was almost entirely done by 1 person, me.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Turboflex on January 21, 2013, 08:52:02 pm
Well you failed one contract.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 21, 2013, 08:55:45 pm
Well I hope you Teutonic guys don't go back to that plan you had for the Free Peasants before we joined TAMDA.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 21, 2013, 08:57:48 pm
I will not pass judgement on Wesley/Teutonic just yet...

We'll see what they do with this new found "freedom" :)  But if they come for any of us in TAMDA, its kinda low, no doubt.

I imagine that may be inevitable, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 21, 2013, 09:02:16 pm
Yes actually.

I must say, for a guy who primarily does everything himself, I've done damn good job at it. No betrayals, no alliances, 2 merc contracts and tons of people who just come to sell at my fief because they don't have to jump through hoops to do it. I accomplished everything I've ever wanted, and it was almost entirely done by 1 person, me.

+1 this guy for supporting my jihad with troops and gear and being pro-guns
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Wesleysnipes on January 21, 2013, 09:03:36 pm
Fuck I should write a cute story of: Teutonic the town bicycle.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Lt_Anders on January 21, 2013, 09:55:58 pm
Well you failed one contract.

Failed?

Well you guys never finished paying me. So in essence I stopped cause you guys refused to pay me.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 21, 2013, 09:58:14 pm
Not betraying my word. Gave a reason to leave. Betraying my word would be us not helping if someone like HG got attacked if we were still in TAMDA. Whats done is done. It's funny how you still like to pick on us. You can and will not get over yourself about KUTT. I do feel sorry for you Sir Tanken. I made our strat color purple in honor of you. Now you and Tugboat use FCC TS and don't even have to balls the say hello. Cowards indeed. I could go on a rant all day but to be honest you're wasting my time. Cheers Tanken.

Oh Anders, the guy who wanted to make his castle a free trade place. Pretty useless. Are you still on the map?

I can't remember last time I went to FCC teamspeak aside from perhaps mercing for a strat battle, and as far as I know, Tugboat no longer plays this game. He gave away all his looms long ago.

And, sure, I may still be bitter about what happened--it's something that's not easily erased, but I gave my word when I said I wouldn't return for war based upon that fact, and I am sticking to it. I'm just noting the trend Wesley, you yourself said your clan has a knack for not sticking to their word--I'm simply pointing out another instance.

It's not an attack on you, it's something you do for yourself that's just worth pointing out to the rest of the community. I'm all for Teutonics leaving the TAMDA, TAMDA itself is nearing its last leg as the need for it is slowly evaporating and the campaign of Strategus for many clans (especially those involved in TAMDA) is growing Stagnant. So, hats off for taking the liberty to leave, as well as others that may follow you, though I do hope that your intentions aren't bent on anyone involved in TAMDA still, as that in itself would be even more of a backstab.


I've said my words, I do not beckon you to reply, nor do I attempt to stir drama between our parties. Like I said, pointing out what has been stated, and in all honesty, looking to be a renown whore for my words with my previous comment. Commence forth with your freedom and let's see what comes of it, Calradia needs more of a stir than just Smoothrich and Kesh bantering on occasion  :lol:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on January 21, 2013, 11:12:02 pm
Hopefully this won't get me kicked out of Hospitallers for posting in diplomacy...gotta put in my 2 cents here.

it's not breaking a contract to join a mutual defense pact, and then decided to leave a month or two later.  Did they say they would stay part of the pact for x numbers of months or days?  Then how are they breaking a pact? 
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 21, 2013, 11:16:46 pm
As I said - I personally hold no grudges for Teutonic leaving...
More just a question of what they do from here like Tanken pointed out.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 21, 2013, 11:31:04 pm
As I said - I personally hold no grudges for Teutonic leaving...
More just a question of what they do from here like Tanken pointed out.

They're going to finish what i started a.ka invade EU = Niemand. Thank you
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BaleOhay on January 22, 2013, 12:03:43 am
did you even set foot on Eu lands?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 22, 2013, 12:05:18 am
did you even set foot on Eu lands?

Nope. My secondary forces got attacked by KUTT and then i had to throw out some vengeance and besiege that village. Turned into a bloodbath and lost 1.7k troops approximately and counting the secondary forces about 2k in total almost.

And then the 3rd army had to run out with the remaining troops and gear. So yeah. But one day the invasion will happen!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on January 22, 2013, 12:08:23 am
invade EU

The one cardinal truth.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on January 22, 2013, 12:08:46 am
Nope. My secondary forces got attacked by KUTT and then i had to throw out some vengeance and besiege that village. Turned into a bloodbath and lost 1.7k troops approximately and counting the secondary forces about 2k in total almost.

And then the 3rd army had to run out with the remaining troops and gear. So yeah. But one day the invasion will happen!
If it was a slaughter in NA then EU will be a fuck bomb going off in your ass...
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 22, 2013, 12:20:57 am
If it was a slaughter in NA then EU will be a fuck bomb going off in your ass...

No because their chocolate chip muffins propaganda would be their downfall and the turning point for our invasion force.

+ In EU i doubt they had as much tincan armor as KUTT got. Master of Tincan Armor :l
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Jack1 on January 22, 2013, 12:27:13 am
Chic chip muffins are actually good.... So.....
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Jack1 on January 22, 2013, 01:15:16 am
Ignore guy above me, blueberry iz da best
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Blueberry Muffin on January 22, 2013, 11:05:35 am
+ In EU i doubt they had as much tincan armor as KUTT got. Master of Tincan Armor :l

Ahahah. Eu has a very autistic approach when it comes to strat. I can tell you that the gear on NA is nothing compared to Eu. Any decent sized strat faction will be using veerrrrry heavy armour. UIF factions tend to use heraldic transitional and hourglass gauntlets, my faction uses grey corrozina I think.... Mail armour is only good for putting in for the population of villages.  :twisted:

I would say if you weighed up average armour for factions in NA and EU, I would say NA is roughly 50-60 body armour and Eu would be around 70.

Thats why NA battles are infinitely more fun....
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on January 23, 2013, 12:14:10 am
Thats why NA battles are infinitely more fun....

Exactly...
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Mae. on January 23, 2013, 01:03:51 am
i'm a +1 fairy today, tomorrow.. who knows..
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 23, 2013, 01:05:17 am
i'm a +1 fairy today, tomorrow.. who knows..


You're a fairy every day.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 23, 2013, 01:12:20 am

You're a fairy every day.

^ He thinks he's smooth! But it's just the lack of Huey!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on January 23, 2013, 03:27:34 am
^ He thinks he's smooth! But it's just the lack of Huey!

How many days has it been since we lost him?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Mae. on January 23, 2013, 03:31:30 am
How many days has it been since we lost him?

too long, my heart aches.
just kidding i talk to that lovable boy every day, he's well. he has a REAL LIFE, i went to cali and tried to stalk him but it didnt work out
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on January 23, 2013, 05:58:06 am
Berenger told me that it is Mae in his Signature, this true? I hope it's true.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Mae. on January 23, 2013, 06:11:50 am
i was worried for two seconds, but then i remember i've never deep throated a banana on cam, she does have a slight resemblance though i suppose...
oh yeah TAMDA
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 23, 2013, 07:00:33 am
Tits or GTFO of the TAMDA thread. Or your steam name will do  :wink:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 23, 2013, 07:26:52 am
i was worried for two seconds, but then i remember i've never deep throated a banana on cam, she does have a slight resemblance though i suppose...
oh yeah TAMDA

We know its you Mae...
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: LordBerenger on January 23, 2013, 07:43:58 am
too long, my heart aches.
just kidding i talk to that lovable boy every day, he's well. he has a REAL LIFE, i went to cali and tried to stalk him but it didnt work out

Looks like someone got a restraining order.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Canary on January 23, 2013, 08:51:31 am
...

  • Stick to game context, don't post any real life related stuff about other community members.

...

If you see a post breaking these rules, please do not respond to it, use the 'report to moderator' button instead. Don't abuse the button to contact the staff, we have private messages for that.

And furthermore, stop veering off-topic.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 23, 2013, 12:17:55 pm
And furthermore, stop veering off-topic.

It's still snowy up here in the Tundra

Edit: My god, Canary's been upgraded
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Carthage on January 23, 2013, 01:13:29 pm
Well I am never looking at bananas the same way again. And to keep this on topic to support a TAMDA fund I say we sell Mae with her banana skills on the CRPG black market....with Sauce and Toms premission of course
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: partyboy on January 23, 2013, 05:51:41 pm
Berenger is creepy and a cautionary tale of what the internet can do to an impressionable young mind, that's all you need to know.

oh there was another page here.  hey guys look at lemongrab what's that crazy guy up to
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Huey Newton on January 24, 2013, 07:16:32 am
i was worried for two seconds, but then i remember i've never deep throated a banana on cam, she does have a slight resemblance though i suppose...
oh yeah TAMDA
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Arjay on January 24, 2013, 08:34:37 am
Woah what is going here
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: oprah_winfrey on January 24, 2013, 05:50:06 pm
i was worried for two seconds, but then i remember i've never deep throated a banana on cam, she does have a slight resemblance though i suppose...
oh yeah TAMDA


gottem.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 24, 2013, 08:40:29 pm
Only the Tundra can bring such joy to this game.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kirbyy on January 31, 2013, 01:48:44 am
Should probably take Tanken's signature off :/

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Lt_Anders on January 31, 2013, 01:57:02 am
I think Tamda is no more, 1 faction disappeared(replaced in it's place by LL), 1 faction joined another alliance, so only 2 left.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on January 31, 2013, 03:32:42 am
Indeed, it's not much any more; even with ATS still hanging around. RIP Northern Empire.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 31, 2013, 03:47:55 am
It's currently a quiet agreement between HG/Remnant, Free Peasants, and Dracul.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on January 31, 2013, 04:17:13 am
My name shall be the last stricken off our lovely TAMDA!

Edit: Untill we get discounted +3 sumpter horses, which may be a while with 1 pp a day.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on January 31, 2013, 05:58:20 pm
First post updated to just HG, Dracul, and Free Peasants
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 04, 2013, 08:35:29 pm
** UPDATE **

Imperium Romanum has joined TAMDA and is under the protection of its defensive agreement network.
They currently own Ismirala in the Tundra. 
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Rhalzo on February 04, 2013, 09:07:30 pm
** UPDATE **

Imperium Romanum has joined TAMDA and is under the protection of its defensive agreement network.
They currently own Ismirala in the Tundra.

Don't the Frisians own Ismirala again?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Natermotor on February 04, 2013, 09:33:48 pm
Don't the Frisians own Ismirala again?

We're getting it in 1-3 days from the Frisians.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 04, 2013, 10:26:03 pm
Koj attacked it last night.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 04, 2013, 10:38:08 pm
I guess to clear things up, at this very moment we're the proper owners of New Ismirala.

Within the next few days, Roma will be the proper owner of New Ismirala.

That's uh...pretty much it.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on February 04, 2013, 10:56:05 pm
No, one of our guys is just getting rid of his army. I just got back from the Hospital and sent a message to sandy about it.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 04, 2013, 11:10:30 pm
I just got back from the Hospital

 :(  You ok?

Sorry to be off topic in my own thread.

---------------------------------

ISMIRALA is under the protection of TAMDA *NOW* as it has been promised to Imperium and is just awaiting transfer.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on February 05, 2013, 01:02:21 am
:(  You ok?

Sorry to be off topic in my own thread.

---------------------------------

ISMIRALA is under the protection of TAMDA *NOW* as it has been promised to Imperium and is just awaiting transfer.


Was a bad couple of days.  :cry:

Back to topic.



Glad to see Tamda is still alive. It keeps the north from falling into a mega-clans hands. One question I do ask though, since Dracul has joined the alliance of Fimbulvetr, do they still count on the protection of TAMDA? Or do they now bring in the alliance with them to counter any attacks made on TAMDA?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tanken on February 05, 2013, 01:28:21 am
Holy crap, I can post again


Yes, the plan, as Sandy said is to give Roma a fief of their own. We have no real interest in staying near the Tundra (unfortunately) It was all just more a pride thing for us to take Ismirala back. I am glad to see it go to a good up-and-coming clan and glad that TAMDA will protect their claim.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on February 05, 2013, 02:38:11 am

Was a bad couple of days.  :cry:

Back to topic.



Glad to see Tamda is still alive. It keeps the north from falling into a mega-clans hands. One question I do ask though, since Dracul has joined the alliance of Flimbulvetur, do they still count on the protection of TAMDA? Or do they now bring in the alliance with them to counter any attacks made on TAMDA?

If a TAMDA member is attacked, Dracul will assist independently (it's up to Frisia and NH if they want to help as well).  However, if Dracul is attacked, it is an attack on TAMDA and Fimbulvetr.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Havoco on February 05, 2013, 05:25:38 am
What if a TAMDA member is attacked by someone from fimbulvetr :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on February 05, 2013, 05:34:53 am
Well, I'd be in quite the pickle then, but I don't think I have much to worry about there.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on February 05, 2013, 05:39:04 am
What if a TAMDA member is attacked by someone from fimbulvetr :mrgreen:


He claims himself neutral then attacks the apparent loser and say he was on the other guys side the whole time.  :twisted:
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 05, 2013, 07:14:02 am
If Dracul is attacked *IN THE TUNDRA* they will have the aid of TAMDA and most likely their allies.

If they are attacked outside of the Tundra then TAMDA has no requirement to defend them, if that makes sense. 
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on February 05, 2013, 09:04:25 am

He claims himself neutral then attacks the apparent loser and say he was on the other guys side the whole time.  :twisted:

There are so many things I could say about your strat faction, but I'm kind and I'll try my best not to offend your leadership.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on February 05, 2013, 11:21:02 am
It's strange after all this time that Elindor still needs to explain TAMDA. Don't fuck with the Tundra, end of story.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Jack1 on February 05, 2013, 01:05:53 pm
What if it is on the border line of the tundra?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Canary on February 05, 2013, 02:56:22 pm
Don't fuck with the Tundra, end of story.

I seem to have poked a hole in that absolute statement.

Oh hey, we tundra now. When do I get force-issued my membership card?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 05, 2013, 04:11:12 pm
It's strange after all this time that Elindor still needs to explain TAMDA. Don't fuck with the Tundra, end of story.

A more accurate statement from what Arys points out is this:
"If you attack TAMDA members in the Tundra, they will help each other defensively"

I seem to have poked a hole in that absolute statement.

Oh hey, we tundra now. When do I get force-issued my membership card?

TAMDA did not get involved because you attacked someone who was NOT in TAMDA (in fact we welcomed it because Teutonic was a threat in the area)

And you don't get force issued anything...

---

This post Canary........are you trying to be a jerk?  -___-

(*EDITED* for simplification of message)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 05, 2013, 04:24:04 pm
This post Canary........are you trying to be a jerk?  -___-
This is the diplomacy part of Strategus, most of everyone acts in an unusual faction.


Anywho, best of wishes for a bloody good war!
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 05, 2013, 04:28:54 pm
This is the diplomacy part of Strategus, most of everyone acts in an unusual faction.


Anywho, best of wishes for a bloody good war!

Whose at war?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 05, 2013, 04:29:44 pm
Whose at war?
Not enough people, I'm just wishing war upon everyone, sort of like wishing you a wonderful pony, but a bit different.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 05, 2013, 04:32:03 pm
Not enough people, I'm just wishing war upon everyone, sort of like wishing you a wonderful pony, but a bit different.

 :?:  :?  You ok Tears? :)
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: BaleOhay on February 05, 2013, 07:05:25 pm
I like wonderful ponies. who do I need to kill in the tundra to get one?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Kelugarn on February 05, 2013, 07:44:43 pm
Not enough people, I'm just wishing war upon everyone, sort of like wishing you a wonderful pony, but a bit different.

Further proof that the 1%-ATS-UIF-Hospitaller-HP-Arrowaine-Kesh-Grey-DRZ love-nonagon is secretly controlling all our lives. Wake up sheeple.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Jack1 on February 05, 2013, 08:21:07 pm
Tears is best NA explainist
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 05, 2013, 10:05:40 pm
It is in the works that Remnant will enter TAMDA with Tismirr.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on February 05, 2013, 10:19:50 pm
Just wondering, if TAMDA members start going on a war of aggression, will that compromise their ability to remain in TAMDA?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on February 05, 2013, 10:34:33 pm
Just wondering, if TAMDA members start going on a war of aggression, will that compromise their ability to remain in TAMDA?

I'm not sure about getting kicked out of TAMDA, but other TAMDA members would not be obligated to help. Let's say the Free Peasants attack Mercs, then the Mercs attack one of our fiefs in TAMDA it wouldn't be protected by TAMDA. It's just a defensive pact for if an outside clan declares war on one of us. We are all friends in TAMDA, so we do have the option to defend each other even without the use of TAMDA.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 05, 2013, 10:49:34 pm
Just wondering, if TAMDA members start going on a war of aggression, will that compromise their ability to remain in TAMDA?

Arys is right...

If a TAMDA clan goes offensive, any retaliatory actions by the clan they attacked will not be something that TAMDA members are required to get involved in.

Also, if a clan is viewed as having a negative impact on TAMDA, the factions can vote to remove that trouble maker faction.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Fringe on February 05, 2013, 11:20:44 pm
There are so many things I could say about your strat faction, but I'm kind a pussy and I'll try my best not to offend your leadership.


Well considering I never got all that serious with my strat faction why in the hell should I be offended? Please go ahead and inform me good sir.

Rather confused on where the insult came at. Maybe you took my post serious. People seem to do that here. Hell, Teutonic just got wiped from a careless post (realize that they probably were going to get it in the ass anyways.) Either way, awaiting your offensive post.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on February 06, 2013, 02:24:16 am

Well considering I never got all that serious with my strat faction why in the hell should I be offended? Please go ahead and inform me good sir.

Rather confused on where the insult came at. Maybe you took my post serious. People seem to do that here. Hell, Teutonic just got wiped from a careless post (realize that they probably were going to get it in the ass anyways.) Either way, awaiting your offensive post.

I just found your post humorous because the Teutonics have a shit reputation with treachery and back stabbery.  No need to get butt hurt over my simple observation, unless you take those kinds of things seriously.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Krosis on February 06, 2013, 02:50:14 am
Arys is right...

If a TAMDA clan goes offensive, any retaliatory actions by the clan they attacked will not be something that TAMDA members are required to get involved in.

Also, if a clan is viewed as having a negative impact on TAMDA, the factions can vote to remove that trouble maker faction.

This is confusing to me, because see when Remnant attacked Hospitaller, you said TAMDA would help you guys out if we made our way past Sungetche.

You guys were the aggressors, and you still wanted the help from TAMDA?

I'm confused.

I believe kinngrimm pointed this out, but everyone ignored him.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Artyem on February 06, 2013, 02:52:28 am
This is confusing to me, because see when Remnant attacked Hospitaller, you said TAMDA would help you guys out if we made our way past Sungetche.

You guys were the aggressors, and you still wanted the help from TAMDA?

I'm confused.

I believe kinngrimm pointed this out, but everyone ignored him.

HG isn't Remnant, if you had attacked HG settlements that would be an attack on a TAMDA member.  HG weren't the aggressors, Remnant was, and I don't think HG helped them out at all.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Krosis on February 06, 2013, 03:04:17 am
HG isn't Remnant, if you had attacked HG settlements that would be an attack on a TAMDA member.  HG weren't the aggressors, Remnant was, and I don't think HG helped them out at all.

HG is part of Remnant on strategus, this has been covered before, they are helping them out right now and I believe we did see some armies go to Sungetche when TKOV was attacking it.


You can't choose when you want to be a part of the faction and when you don't.. IMO.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Relit on February 06, 2013, 03:07:24 am
HG is part of Remnant on strategus, this has been covered before, they are helping them out right now and I believe we did see some armies go to Sungetche when TKOV was attacking it.


You can't choose when you want to be a part of the faction and when you don't.. IMO.

I direct you to this link, good sir:

http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/holy-guard-%28hg%29-change-of-diplomacy/
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tom Cruise on February 06, 2013, 03:15:20 am
Krosis, why are you wondering this now when we are well at peace? We (remnant) were in fact the aggressors, however HG is apart of us on strat. Essentially the same thing as the VE (tkov, mb, hoc) but much smaller. So of course they helped us out, because we are one faction. Nobody else in TAMDA provided any other support other then mercs against you guys, same for the VE war.

Although I have no idea why any of  that is relevant considering that was a very long time ago and everyone is at peace now. Also HG is now a separate faction in strat but Remnant and HG are still apart of TAMDA.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Krosis on February 06, 2013, 03:23:54 am
Quote
I direct you to this link, good sir:

http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/holy-guard-%28hg%29-change-of-diplomacy/

that looks fairly new.




Krosis, why are you wondering this now when we are well at peace? We (remnant) were in fact the aggressors, however HG is apart of us on strat. Essentially the same thing as the VE (tkov, mb, hoc) but much smaller. So of course they helped us out, because we are one faction. Nobody else in TAMDA provided any other support other then mercs against you guys, same for the VE war.

Although I have no idea why any of  that is relevant considering that was a very long time ago and everyone is at peace now. Also HG is now a separate faction in strat but Remnant and HG are still apart of TAMDA.


I'm just pointing out what nobody seemed to notice when Elindor posted what he posted, and how he is contradicting himself now. Not really trying to get an argument out of all of this. I was just wondering what Elindor had to say about it.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Tom Cruise on February 06, 2013, 03:29:25 am
What are you talking about? He said exactly what I said.   


If a TAMDA clan goes offensive, any retaliatory actions by the clan they attacked will not be something that TAMDA members are required to get involved in.

Wasnt trying to have an argument either, just telling you the facts :P
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 06, 2013, 05:48:03 am
Thanks Tom,

Krosis...its simple.

Remnant aggressed and in their advance they took Sungetche.  In return, Hospitaller took Sungetche back....all fair.
TAMDA would not get involved in that.

The warning was that if Hosp CONTINUE further and THEMSELVES became the aggressors, TAMDA would get involved.
Once they got Sungetche back, things were returned to their original situation.

Does that not make sense?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Krosis on February 06, 2013, 06:29:56 am
Thanks Tom,

Krosis...its simple.

Remnant aggressed and in their advance they took Sungetche.  In return, Hospitaller took Sungetche back....all fair.
TAMDA would not get involved in that.

The warning was that if Hosp CONTINUE further and THEMSELVES became the aggressors, TAMDA would get involved.
Once they got Sungetche back, things were returned to their original situation.

Does that not make sense?

So tell me if I'm getting this wrong..


After Remnant attacked us, you think it would have been unfair for Hospitaller to attack back the Remnant FACTION, because then WE would have been the aggressors?
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: KaleLord on February 06, 2013, 06:45:24 am
So tell me if I'm getting this wrong..


After Remnant attacked us, you think it would have been unfair for Hospitaller to attack back the Remnant FACTION, because then WE would have been the aggressors?

This is what's in my mind.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 06, 2013, 08:57:20 am
So tell me if I'm getting this wrong..


After Remnant attacked us, you think it would have been unfair for Hospitaller to attack back the Remnant FACTION, because then WE would have been the aggressors?

YOU OWNED SUNGETCHE
REMNANT TOOK IT
YOU TOOK IT BACK
THIS WAS FINE WITH TAMDA BECAUSE REMNANT TOOK IT FROM YOU FIRST
HAD YOU ATTACKED HOLDINGS IN THE TUNDRA PAST SUNGETCHE THEN TAMDA WOULD HAVE GOTTEN INVOLVED.

Yes, TAMDA would have gotten involved if you launched an assault on holdings in the tundra instead of stopping at taking Sungetche back.

This is a none issue now though HG is not part of Remnant. 
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: ArysOakheart on February 06, 2013, 11:12:02 am
Let it go Elindor. If they really think its that big of a deal then let them deal with it. People have been questioning TAMDA since the start, though it's been plainly clear what it means. So if you want to go to war with TAMDA because of some shit, say so, otherwise quit shitposting about technicalities. The best way to find out about TAMDA would be attacking us.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Aztek on February 06, 2013, 11:34:19 am
For the record Hospitaller has no issue's with the TAMDA or any of its members, along with Remnant.

I'm sure Krosis was just curious about a situation that could have happened while we were fighting Remnant, which is a none issue now so no point going into it.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 06, 2013, 03:58:36 pm
I agree Aztek, thanks for being levelheaded about it.

Its maybe simplest put this way:

Normal alliances ally OFFENSIVELY and DEFENSIVELY
TAMDA allies only DEFENSIVELY (and only within the Tundra).

So if X Clan attacks someone, we dont help them attack.  If X Clan gets attacked in their fief outside the Tundra, we dont help them.
We only help X Clan if THEY attacked INSIDE the tundra.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Turboflex on February 06, 2013, 04:16:03 pm
The issue is outside those basics. He was wondering why Tamda would have interviened against Hospitaller advances past Sengetche despite Remnant/HG being the clear aggressors in launching a war of conquest against Hospitaller. Under the longstanding conventions of warfare, it's usually accepted that the defender of an assault has a right to counter attack into the aggressor's land if the initial assault is defeated in theirs.

In that case it would seem Tamda functions as more than a simple defensive alliance, but includes hard territorial guarantees no matter what the circumstances.

Membership in TAMDA is NOT meant to be a "safeguard" at home while member factions initiate
offensive wars elsewhere.  Member factions that are deemed to be a liability by their own
offensive initiatives will be removed from TAMDA to protect the other member factions.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 06, 2013, 04:20:04 pm
Well, TAMDA is being rewritten as we speak between the member factions and will be reposted soon.

It will be largely the same but rewritten to reflect a shift in mission.


----


So much of this could be a moot point. 

But yes, Turbo, TAMDA from that perspective is an alliance...but as I said, only defensively.  We're not gonna help our members attack out, but we're gonna help them defend in.  To contrast, most alliances do both.

EDIT - and yes that quote still stands.  If someone is always aggressing, TAMDA is gonna vote to boot them.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on February 06, 2013, 04:33:48 pm
Well yeah, that's the difference between a defense pact (what TAMDA is) and an alliance.  Although an alliance would usually require communication between the allies before one goes on an offensive campaign.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 06, 2013, 05:42:13 pm
TAMDA is currently being re-written by the existing members as its mission has shifted since its inception.



To expand, in some ways, the concerns about inconsistencies are true - however TAMDA did state it would remove member factions that "caused trouble for the agreement by being aggressive".  The conflict partially came in how TAMDA was formed and the interests of Teutonic/Remnant/HG at that time.  The connection between Remnant and HG also caused some confusing situations.

The new mission of this group will be one of creating an area in the map where free trade can exist for small factions and individuals without being in the shadow of large clans and conglomerates.  It is currently being rewritten as a collaboration between the member clans and the issues of how to deal with member clans being aggressors elsewhere is something we are addressing currently.

The new mission may be NON EXPANSIONARY completely.  Or, it may BE A DEFENSIVE AGREEMENT as some have stated TAMDA is/was, where we do not aid each other in foreign wars but we do if someone invades into the Tundra regardless of what they have done elsewhere (and if the group deemed a group to be causing too much trouble they could remove them from the agreement).



I will link to its new thread when it is ready.  Locking this for now.
Title: Re: Tundra Area Mutual Defense Agreement (TAMDA) [NA]
Post by: Elindor on February 07, 2013, 10:43:30 pm
Here is the new agreement.
http://forum.meleegaming.com/diplomacy/free-lands-of-the-tundra/msg719244/#msg719244