cRPG

Strategus => Diplomacy => Topic started by: Segd on November 25, 2013, 06:31:37 pm

Title: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 25, 2013, 06:31:37 pm
Since Strat is boring & old & EU has 1,115,846 troops, we decided to bring new for C-rpg game mode - Team Deathmatch  :twisted:
We will try to do battles regularly to satisfy the thirst of XP for EU part of the map.

Additional rules for this type of battles:
1)Do not attack until both teams had build their bases
2)Do not destroy\use\go near enemy siege equipment(spawn points, racks, ladders, towers)
3)Do not spawnrape or take enemy flags.
4)Try to fight between 2 bases. Don't do some around map flanking
5)No tactics, shieldwalls etc. This is a deathmatch, so just kill 'em all
6)No catapults
7)skyladders are allowed

Breaking the rules will be punished by banning of your ass from both sides forever.

Battles:
1) http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5914
2) http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5931
3) http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5937
4) http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5959
5) http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5977

-And remember: nobody tries to kill anybody till I say: "Lets get it on!"
-Lets get it on!
(c) Celebrity Deathmatch
http://youtu.be/yKs8ft0dBss?t=1m
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rogue on November 25, 2013, 06:38:19 pm
330k+ tickets to grind!

This will hpefully run smoothly once established, for the first battle make sure to keep your headphones ON before the battle, for final instructions. Anyone who decides to be a hater or messes this up will potentially lose out on tens of millions of XP! We will automatically accept all Druzhina and Coalition players, if demand for slots is high we'll additionally try to rotate players. So if you did not make it into one or two of those, put that into your application for the next one. You can sign up for one or both sides.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on November 25, 2013, 06:57:20 pm
^ renown whores! commend me  instead of these two!  :twisted:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Canuck on November 25, 2013, 07:00:02 pm
This is what strat should be anyway. If you think you could spare them, maybe you could donate a few thousand troops to the NA xp battles too!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 25, 2013, 07:00:27 pm
So if you did not make it into one or two of those, put that into your application for the next one. You can sign up for one or both sides.
The good thing is that since it is not about whiningwinning, then low leveled players will have a good chance to be accepted.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Switchtense on November 25, 2013, 07:07:31 pm
maybe you should make people apply for both sides, and then just mix the teams up a lot, so its not like drz/go vs coa

organise the teams so people play with who they usually dont fight with :)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Latvian on November 25, 2013, 07:10:43 pm
make it like that, 1 UIF go to uif side 2nd uif go to coallition side etc etc, cuz i am tired to fight same people all the time. It has been a good while since i have been teamkilled by kapikulu  :?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Conquisitore on November 25, 2013, 07:25:36 pm
you make me smile, thanks to DRZ and COA
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Suchechka on November 25, 2013, 10:10:27 pm
Great! Will participate, if there will be a spot for me. Also, familiar very well to events like that - was at all NA that kind.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Bohannon on November 25, 2013, 11:00:03 pm
NBA mode on.


It has been a good while since i have been teamkilled by kapikulu  :?

I'll stick up with you bro, no worries.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 26, 2013, 05:03:12 pm
First winner:
In_your_phase(it was probably phase) banned  from all our future battles on all Strats :)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on November 26, 2013, 05:04:04 pm
good admin banned admin!  :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 26, 2013, 07:54:22 pm
1.3kk for our team I think. It was nice to do some brainless killings  :twisted: There would be 2 more battles in few days. I'll try to bring more good weapons, especially 0 slot 1h swords for our ranged :)

(click to show/hide)
:rolleyes:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Varadin on November 26, 2013, 08:04:23 pm
One of the best battles i played . thanks
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on November 26, 2013, 08:04:27 pm
cool to see you guys doing this, congrats on the glorious XP and fun to be had.  Down with devs, up with players!

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 27, 2013, 06:35:07 pm
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5931
Another one :)

Also:
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5927
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on November 27, 2013, 07:10:13 pm
First winner:
In_your_phase(it was probably phase) banned  from all our future battles on all Strats :)

I loled hard when I learned that one of the HRE admins banned Segd for 3 days one hour before gentleman battle, which he organized  :P
Phase unbanned from our xp battles ^^ sry for dat  :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Butan on November 27, 2013, 08:20:14 pm
Good news for XP.

Bad news for Strat.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Jarlek on November 27, 2013, 10:54:09 pm
Can I come too? :D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on November 28, 2013, 10:46:48 am
Now I can fights side by side with vovka while beating the crap out of fips!

awww yeaaah
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Godwin on November 28, 2013, 11:27:20 am
I want in please!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 28, 2013, 04:33:14 pm
btw, there is a battle in 30mins. we need 102 mercs, so everybody welcomed.
Loots of xp.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 28, 2013, 05:49:16 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Soulreaver on November 28, 2013, 07:54:25 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
:lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on November 30, 2013, 09:17:35 pm
#4 http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5959
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 03, 2013, 06:45:03 pm
#5 http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5977
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Lennu on December 03, 2013, 09:29:33 pm
How long will these battles keep coming? I wanna change my hero back into my polearmer for these battles :D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 04, 2013, 08:11:19 am
can we ban siege towers? it just gives archers and crossbows invincibility
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Wiltzu on December 04, 2013, 10:19:57 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
:lol:

I'm famous! Though I'm not completely sure who I wanted to get banned that time..
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 05, 2013, 11:57:14 am
DRZ XP battle today:
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=5993

We won't do rollcalls, so even low lvls who have 15str & a brain to read the rules will have a very good chance to be accepted.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 05, 2013, 06:35:39 pm
will have a very good chance to be accepted
Well, everybody who had brains & 15str(level 9+) was accepted & we still had about 20 free slots.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 05, 2013, 08:07:25 pm
Well, everybody who had brains & 15str(level 9+) was accepted & we still had about 20 free slots.
very nice battle, it might help if people knew in advance that they would get a password on ts. It was not very clear at the start :)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 05, 2013, 08:52:41 pm
It was in the description :)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 06, 2013, 09:41:34 am
oops didn't see that :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Soulreaver on December 06, 2013, 02:07:37 pm
the beginning was bad and boring cause of leechers, but later it became like a bloodbath
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 11, 2013, 06:17:20 pm
http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=6048
DRZ XP battle, we need to fill 102 slots, so everyone will have 100% chance to be accepted if they have 15str & a brain.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 13, 2013, 10:30:54 am
WTF? And what kurwa now? XP battles? Pfffu  :rolleyes:

(click to show/hide)

Jebać Drużynę?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on December 13, 2013, 11:37:00 am
WTF? And what kurwa now? XP battles? Pfffu  :rolleyes:

(click to show/hide)

Jebać Drużynę?
why u ban all russkies from TS? (((
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 13, 2013, 11:42:38 am
Dog will sit ... eee... ofc... god wills it  :twisted:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Kalp on December 13, 2013, 11:42:59 am
WTF? And what kurwa now? XP battles? Pfffu  :rolleyes:

(click to show/hide)

heh, exactly  :mrgreen:

(click to show/hide)

why u ban all russkies from TS? (((
I just start my day, will check what happened with TS.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 11:52:17 am
Friday 13th  :D :D :D

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 13, 2013, 11:56:09 am
Friday 13th  :D :D :D

that explains a lot  :cry: :cry: :cry:

EDIT:

HRE - you stinking cowards :!:

(click to show/hide)

+

(click to show/hide)

Thank you DRZ!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Wiltzu on December 13, 2013, 12:40:50 pm
Why do I get weird feeling that Harpag is drunk  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 13, 2013, 12:43:25 pm
Why do I get weird feeling that Harpag is drunk  :mrgreen:

Look at map  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Wiltzu on December 13, 2013, 01:27:09 pm
Look at map  :rolleyes:

I assume you're referring to the strategus map. I can't find a reason from there why DRZ and The Coalition shouldn't have xp deathmatch battles nor why you would not be drunk.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 13, 2013, 02:30:27 pm
I assume you're referring to the strategus map. I can't find a reason from there why DRZ and The Coalition shouldn't have xp deathmatch battles nor why you would not be drunk.

Why? Cuz no Coalition  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 02:37:19 pm
And I was counting on the next siege of Narra  :cry: I was on the first one, second I missed and third is gonna be kinda lame...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 13, 2013, 02:40:25 pm
Hronology:
1)yesterday's morning: I chat with Rogue about upcomming xp battles(We should've attack Asugan & Tulga yesterday). He tells me that COA wants to wipe all troops after Narra battle. He offers us troops in Tulga & Asugan. Since I'm a greedy bastard, I ask for all COA resources to drawn EU in XP battles. He accepts my offer, & I begin to search DRZ players to take ownership, but not telling them the reason. Just: "go to Narra & wait for the end of the battle".
2)yesterday's evening before the battle: almost all DRZ guys are on their positions. I apply for COA defence of Narra(since technically they are not our enemies anymore, & victory or defeat of Grey's army will only determine which UIF faction will have Narra & 30k troops. Also defending is more fun ;) ) First DRZ butthurt wave beggins. I start getting insults from uif guys.
3)yesterday's evening after the battle: Druzhina guy is the new lord of Narra. Same for Tulbuk(10k troops), Tulga(42k) & Ichamur(13k). Second DRZ butthurt wave beggins. Some players want to quit to not play with such scums like me. Transfer of Velua(30k) & Jameyyed(10k) fails.
4)Now: everybody in DRZ hight ranks(exept Vovka, praise the Lord his dota soul) thinks that: I'm a traitor, that COA left because of our XP battles(my fault), that I betrayed Hetman, Harpag & other UIF guys, I made the quit of COA look good & now UIF cannot claim proper victory.

So, in conclusion: I was doing all this stuff on my own(& I thought it would be in the best interest of everybody to save 200k troops from disappearance & to use it for funxp battles). I will ask everybody who got their Lordship to give this fiefs back(so COA will be able to destroy their troops, equip & gold). All my fiefs should be seized by members of Druzhina without resistance on my side. I will resign from DRZ(both faction & clan) & will join Mercs  :lol:
GL, HF! btw, Volvo created new game mod for Dota

Almost forgot the most important part:
Rest in Peace, Lord Druzhina_Segd, best Strat crossbowman, the greatest hero of EU(most renown), Owner of Ahmerrad, Bariyye, Nelag Castle, Tulbuk Castle, Sharwa Castle, Samarra Castle, Dugan, Dirigh Aban, Bulugur, Tulbuk, Tamnuh, Habba, Fishara, Iqbayl, Mijayet, Tazjunat and Aab  8-)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 13, 2013, 02:47:43 pm
Ahaha

Omg, i signed up for 2 xp battles, but couldn't make it, pl0x to be more omg
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 02:48:38 pm
Hey, Segd, no hard feelings on our side really, its just pity that Coalition decided to withdraw... Better to end this this way, than another.

I personally think its far more entertaining to have battles against someone that one has chosen as enemy rather than battles "for fun". On the other hand strat become more boring recently indeed, so maybe it was the time to end this shit...

Shame on you HRE and Fallen  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: BASNAK on December 13, 2013, 02:57:48 pm
Hronology:
1)yesterday's morning: I chat with Rogue about upcomming xp battles(We should've attack Asugan & Tulga yesterday). He tells me that COA wants to wipe all troops after Narra battle. He offers us troops in Tulga & Asugan. Since I'm a greedy bastard, I ask for all COA resources to drawn EU in XP battles. He accepts my offer, & I begin to search DRZ players to take ownership, but not telling them the reason. Just: "go to Narra & wait for the end of the battle".
2)yesterday's evening before the battle: almost all DRZ guys are on their positions. I apply for COA defence of Narra(since technically they are not our enemies anymore, & victory or defeat of Grey's army will only determine which UIF faction will have Narra & 30k troops. Also defending is more fun ;) ) First DRZ butthurt wave beggins. I start getting insults from uif guys.
3)yesterday's evening after the battle: Druzhina guy is the new lord of Narra. Same for Tulbuk(10k troops), Tulga(42k) & Ichamur(13k). Second DRZ butthurt wave beggins. Some players want to quit to not play with such scums like me. Transfer of Velua(30k) & Jameyyed(10k) fails.
4)Now: everybody in DRZ hight ranks(exept Vovka, praise the Lord his dota soul) thinks that: I'm a traitor, that COA left because of our XP battles(my fault), that I betrayed Hetman, Harpag & other UIF guys, I made the quit of COA look good & now UIF cannot claim proper victory.

So, in conclusion: I was doing all this stuff on my own(& I thought it would be in the best interest of everybody to save 200k troops from disappearance & to use it for funxp battles). I will ask everybody who got their Lordship to give this fiefs back(so COA will be able to destroy their troops, equip & gold). All my fiefs should be seized by members of Druzhina without resistance on my side. I will resign from DRZ(both faction & clan) & will join Mercs  :lol:
GL, HF! btw, Volvo created new game mod for Dota

I thought russians always had good control over their subjects. Don't you have some secret Druzhina KGB-equivalent to deal with these people.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

You make fuck to my S&D I make fuck to your face -Vovka, Leader of Druzhina
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rogue on December 13, 2013, 02:59:29 pm
It is mind boggling that anyone would consider Segd a "traitor" or blame him for us leaving. The XP battles were not a cause but a symptom, for ages we have been nothing more than a faint shadow of our former selves, only looking strong on paper due to the large amount of resources. Unable to do anything on the map, with very few actually active strat players left and tired and burned out from over one year of Strat, with the same few guys doing the majority of the work. Virtually no one had the energy nor the desire to continue "playing" this. Fun ceased to be a reason to work on strat long ago. The only driving factor was to not letting all we worked so long and hard for go to waste. That is why we resisted as best as we could when we got attacked, instead of turning into gift boxes, roll over and die a spawn cap like Mercs & Templars. XP battles seemed a good and easy to do alternative to our originally planned exit: burn it all and call it quits.

Nobody questins UIFs victory anyway, ours was a lost cause for almost half a year now. Even if we had active strat players to actually do anything with all the stuff we still have, we would not stand a chance with virtually the entire map against us, except for the Bros (honorable mention).

If you serouisly feel cheated out of an already achieved victory, I am truly sorry, maybe you should have tried harder to actually capture one of our fiefs.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Buschtrommel on December 13, 2013, 03:02:30 pm
Hey, Segd, no hard feelings on our side really, its just pity that Coalition decided to withdraw... Better to end this this way, than another.

I personally think its far more entertaining to have battles against someone that one has chosen as enemy rather than battles "for fun". On the other hand strat become more boring recently indeed, so maybe it was the time to end this shit...

Shame on you HRE and Fallen  :rolleyes:

Why shame on HRE and Fallens ????? I can remember that you said after the big banwave, Grey order left strategus, and no one of us have bad words about that to you and now after all members of HRE Fallen going afk ( the game is dead) you say shame on us .... hmm i have bad feelings about this word rly :D
 
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 03:20:30 pm
Well, we at least were dedicated enough to defend the fiefs to the end...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Farooq on December 13, 2013, 03:23:03 pm
everyone should respect Coalition's decision.

it's really sad to see you guys leaving now and i can understand it, that you are giving all your fiefs to segd but wouldn't it be much better to give the fiefs to random small clans? you would bring some colour and action to this strat and make some small factions happy (for example fenris...this guys are so poor :D )
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rogue on December 13, 2013, 03:24:17 pm
I see no reason why we should feel ashamed because we decided to leave strat. Quite the contrary, we played a good round, had loads of fights and it was even fun for a while. Enjoy our fiefs and your victory.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Farooq on December 13, 2013, 03:24:40 pm
everyone should respect Coalition's decision.

it's really sad to see you guys leaving now and i can understand it, that you are giving all your fiefs to segd but wouldn't it be much better to give the fiefs to random small clans? you would bring some colour and action to this strat and make some small factions happy (for example fenris...this guys are so poor :D )

btw....dont missunderstand me! i love it to be a bandit....dont want any fiefs  8-)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Hetman_The_Grey on December 13, 2013, 03:26:18 pm
ha ha ha ..... ahahhahahahaha .... hehehehehehhe ..wuahahahahhahahha .ahhahahahahahah hehehehehehhe wuahahahahhahaahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Farooq on December 13, 2013, 03:27:39 pm
Well, we at least were dedicated enough to defend the fiefs to the end...


it's just a freaking game erasmas -.-
they are quitting = RP is over

now you have got to find a new enemy! if you want, i could make a suggestion: KAPIKULULULU  :twisted:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Conquisitore on December 13, 2013, 03:30:31 pm
See you in M:BG or Bannerlord
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 13, 2013, 03:31:56 pm
everyone should respect Coalition's decision.

it's really sad to see you guys leaving now and i can understand it, that you are giving all your fiefs to segd but wouldn't it be much better to give the fiefs to random small clans? you would bring some colour and action to this strat and make some small factions happy (for example fenris...this guys are so poor :D )
Some fiefs already cleansed from any life. So go get 'em!  :wink:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 03:41:25 pm
it's just a freaking game erasmas -.-

Nah, it was a game, truly strategic one, cause people put some effort into achieving effect by ... ehm... various means. And this forum has always been a part of it :D

Now its mostly a playground, or at least it's turning into it. That is why I'm sorry.

EDIT:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Farooq on December 13, 2013, 03:43:02 pm
Some fiefs already cleansed from any life. So go get 'em!  :wink:

as i said....i'm a bandit...and not interested in any fiefs. you could be a hero and give some of this fiefs to small clans (FIEF+TROOPS+EQUIPMENT)
c'mon segd be a hero!!!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Larvae on December 13, 2013, 03:56:47 pm
Well,kinda sad,u were always there...  :(
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 13, 2013, 04:29:03 pm
wait, coalition leaves strat forever or only for this round?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 13, 2013, 04:34:54 pm
It is mind boggling that anyone would consider Segd a "traitor" or blame him for us leaving. The XP battles were not a cause but a symptom, for ages we have been nothing more than a faint shadow of our former selves, only looking strong on paper due to the large amount of resources. Unable to do anything on the map, with very few actually active strat players left and tired and burned out from over one year of Strat, with the same few guys doing the majority of the work. Virtually no one had the energy nor the desire to continue "playing" this. Fun ceased to be a reason to work on strat long ago. The only driving factor was to not letting all we worked so long and hard for go to waste. That is why we resisted as best as we could when we got attacked, instead of turning into gift boxes, roll over and die a spawn cap like Mercs & Templars. XP battles seemed a good and easy to do alternative to our originally planned exit: burn it all and call it quits.

Nobody questins UIFs victory anyway, ours was a lost cause for almost half a year now. Even if we had active strat players to actually do anything with all the stuff we still have, we would not stand a chance with virtually the entire map against us, except for the Bros (honorable mention).

If you serouisly feel cheated out of an already achieved victory, I am truly sorry, maybe you should have tried harder to actually capture one of our fiefs.  :mrgreen:



PS:
@Olwen/kinngrimm/Panos/ no_rules and other interested - this is your 5 minutes - do not waste your chance and do something funny at the end of round!

EDIT:

http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/nerobefehl/

NEROBEFEHL - miraculously avoided by conscious intervention of Segd. Tkank you Segd. Fu Rogue. I always felt that you are a step away from that barbarity.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Ego_HRE on December 13, 2013, 05:50:25 pm
ha ha ha ..... ahahhahahahaha .... hehehehehehhe ..wuahahahahhahahha .ahhahahahahahah hehehehehehhe wuahahahahhahaahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.


Was that you?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 13, 2013, 06:19:51 pm
@no_rules - this is your 5 minutes - do not waste your chance and do something funny at the end of round!

wut? since when do I participate in strat? :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 07:24:16 pm
So I see some castles and cities returned to HRE. Now these are being emptied - all cash and troops are gone.

Did you guys return to the original plan of burning this stuff? I understand that you want to quit, but do you really want to ruin game for whoever is left? If so - THAT IS EVEN MORE LAME. Its like - I am bored so noone else will play again too.

Don't do it. Better give this shit to some small faction, if you don't want Druzhina to take over stuff.

Unless you want to reorganize, but I don't know how leaving cities emptied may help in it...

Very disappointing.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 13, 2013, 08:20:08 pm
I guess we are putting all their troops and gold together with drz to make xp battles?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tactical_One on December 13, 2013, 09:01:19 pm
What happened on coalition on strat ?

I dislike idea of exp battles, war on strategus are very nice. Tactic strategy, treachery and all that stuff. Last siege at Narra was pure fun.

Normal battles/sieges we got on EU1 and EU2
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Franke on December 13, 2013, 10:16:31 pm
There is nothing to add to what has been written before.

Strat was no fun for us anymore; what we invested (time, energy,...) exceeded by far what we gained from this game (fun).

I've been sitting in Narra for like 9 or 10 months now because no one else wanted to do it, pushing tickets and equipment around, literally dying of boredom.

The forum part of Strategus was no fun either. The "precious Roleplay" that some claim to have enjoyed here in my opinion mostly consisted of flaming, whining and insulting others.

I feel sorry (I really do) for GO that they feel cheated out of victory now, you guys surely have invested as much time and energy into this as we did. You still can regard yourself as victors, and I'd like to congratulate you for obviously being able to find more reliable allies (and more of them) as we did. I know this doesn't make up for the feeling of satisfaction after storming the enemy capital, but insted of calling us "losers" on the forum, you can flame us as cowards now (it would actually confirm my view on this forum as a platform for roleplay).


I'd like to point out that I really feel sorry for Szegd, who obviously got into a hell of problems for pulling this of with us, I actually had expected these xp battles to be the better alternative to wiping everything.

And last, but not least

wait, coalition leaves strat forever or only for this round?

We, the HRE part of the Coalition leadership (Rogue, Fips, Niko and me) had a short talk about any possible future Strat rounds and it seems that no one of us is willing to do this to this extend anymore.
But this was on the summit of our Strat burnout, so nothing is sure.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 13, 2013, 10:28:53 pm
Guys, whatever you do, JUST DON'T BURN THE FIEFS. Don't respec them. It will make them utterly useless, and beyond repair in this phase of this round. And someone may still want to have some fun. Don't leave Strat with the sticker "dickheads" on your back.

More on strat will follow. I am preparing wall of text :)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 13, 2013, 11:06:51 pm
Erasmas, Rogue tried to give his fiefs to Segd to make xp battles out of it so the community got something of the coalition stuff. But Segd got called an traitor for the will to bring xp to crpg.

They tried to make use of their stuff over Segds work, because they themself cannot give xp battles, coz they lack the time in real life to do it.


we would not stand a chance with virtually the entire map against us, except for the Bros (honorable mention).
Yruma Castle will be open for every HRE, Fallen or Great Khan who wants to participate in Strat furthermore. We are quite inactive and we wont become active unless you wait 2 years for me finishing school^^
Just know we are there and we got open doors to all our Friends.
Thanks.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 13, 2013, 11:47:27 pm
Okay okay.  If you give me all the stuff, I will do proper EXP battles.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Franke on December 13, 2013, 11:51:11 pm
Coalition will survive, leaders may not want to keep going the same as ever (i can understand that), but i can't imagine every member will quit.

It's kind of you to say this but I think you do not know how few active guys we actually have/had left.

If some of our guiys should want to continue, they are of course free to do so.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: MURDERTRON on December 13, 2013, 11:52:34 pm
Do them at better times then. I havent been able to do any recently cos they're at stupid-o'clock.

The times are only stupid because you're a stupid European.

 :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

It's kind of you to say this but I think you do not know how few active guys we actually have/had left.

If some of our guiys should want to continue, they are of course free to do so.

Most NA factions only operate on a few active Strat players.  Of course, that statement doesn't count troop farmers.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 14, 2013, 01:04:18 am
Veluca
(click to show/hide)

Jameyyed Castle
(click to show/hide)

Narra
(click to show/hide)

Malayurg Castle
(click to show/hide)

Tulbuk Castle
(click to show/hide)

Sungetche Castle
(click to show/hide)

Ichamur
(click to show/hide)

Distar Castle
(click to show/hide)

Question: where are these tickets? We are talking about at least 120k , and most likely much more . If these tickets are burned , this is just sad. Much better export all that shit even to NA or whatever, than mindlessly waste . Troop cap at 1 and hey - fu all. I hope that's only my paranoia.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 01:12:15 am
Free castles and cities! Run, guys, run!!! Full respec takes only 7 days!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Osiris on December 14, 2013, 01:13:11 am
The east sucks. The real fun is in the north west :D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on December 14, 2013, 01:32:29 am
that explains a lot  :cry: :cry: :cry:

EDIT:

HRE - you stinking cowards :!:

(click to show/hide)

+

(click to show/hide)

Thank you DRZ!


Segd 1 hour later  :P
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=pQFGmTiNq9U#t=2483 from 41:23  :P :P :P :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Keshian on December 14, 2013, 05:00:53 am
Sad to see you guys go, but I completely understand and hope you have more fun in games where developers give a shit.  - idiot fucking developers should have reset strategus 5 months ago with how broken the economy was, how many bugs have given unlimited gold to various clans, etc.

Maybe for once in 4 years the eastern europeans might actually fight each other instead of every single one being butt buddy with each other and killing the eu side of strategus.

Lastly, kind of hoped you might have sent some of those troops our way - I can promise we'd have made use of them.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Butan on December 14, 2013, 05:24:50 am
Lastly, kind of hoped you might have sent some of those troops our way - I can promise we'd have made use of them.


Nah... With all respect to NA, I think that in the end you're like us EU: if you had more troops, you would turtle more, and give up wars. Just like EU did  :lol:

I'm glad to see burned tickets, if we want more fun we need lowered overall troops/silver/S&D => a come back of the first months of strategus. We cant reach that far in the past but sending 120k troops to hell is a good beginning. Burn the rest in battles guys, we still have a fucking million troops to go, 3 big battles a day and we would need months to kill them all.

Less tickets/less players/less troop farmers; for the same number of fiefs = less grind to get fiefs, more wars. If each castles/cities hadnt at least 5 defense waves worth of garrison, the boredom would vanish. Fun in strat = seeing fiefs change hands + some open field battles for the lolz...

Conclusion: really glad for what Coa did, even though it was just to say "fuck you" to those who didnt like what they wanted to do in the first place. In the end it doesnt matter though, us players still doing things on the strategus map have new fiefs to conquer, with less troops to bother  :wink:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 14, 2013, 09:35:53 am
Question: where are these tickets? We are talking about at least 120k , and most likely much more . If these tickets are burned , this is just sad. Much better export all that shit even to NA or whatever, than mindlessly waste . Troop cap at 1 and hey - fu all. I hope that's only my paranoia.

DRZ?

Guys, whatever you do, JUST DON'T BURN THE FIEFS. Don't respec them. It will make them utterly useless, and beyond repair in this phase of this round. And someone may still want to have some fun. Don't leave Strat with the sticker "dickheads" on your back.
I understand your concern, but I would like you to consider the following as somebody who was not active in strat himself:
wouldn't respeccing the fiefs be better for the greys and DRZ? You see, at this moment you are stinking rich and there will probably never come a time you guys run out of gold. You can just take the castles and stay rich, while if other factions tried it they would run out of money. TLDR: respeccing fiefs would keep all poor factions away from them, allowing you to take them and dominate the map.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Buschtrommel on December 14, 2013, 10:16:54 am
First:  HRE is not only a c-rpg clan, thats why the clan will never die!!!!

Second: All will be burned and it feels very very good :D

Thrid: 
No one cares about this shitty buggy strat anymore :D, feel free to play another games or spend some time in RL( when you have one :D )

So far Niko

Ps.: To all whining guys: Keep it up its funny :D 
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 14, 2013, 10:39:47 am
I don't care who gets the troops, just as long as they aren't deleted... Cos that'd be a pretty big waste.
Deleting the troops would be dickish to their own members, I mean fuck, they could sell them for quite a few looms.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 10:43:46 am
Nikodin, I do not know it is only you who is a selfish, egocentric idiot, or if it the entire clan full of morons. We used to have a lot of respect for you guys.

Fuck you, fuck off, and burn in hell.

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Buschtrommel on December 14, 2013, 10:48:57 am
Nikodin, I do not know it is only you who is a selfish, egocentric idiot, or if it the entire clan full of morons. We used to have a lot of respect for you guys.

Fuck you, fuck off, and burn in hell.

how i said its funny :D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: ARN_ on December 14, 2013, 10:50:50 am
Nikodin, I do not know it is only you who is a selfish, egocentric idiot, or if it the entire clan full of morons. We used to have a lot of respect for you guys.

Fuck you, fuck off, and burn in hell.
Man don't be that rude...

Edit
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Spurdospera on December 14, 2013, 10:50:59 am
Deleting the troops would be dickish to their own members, I mean fuck, they could sell them for quite a few looms.
How much do you offer for troops,gear and silver? :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 14, 2013, 10:52:11 am
Nikodin, I do not know it is only you who is a selfish, egocentric idiot, or if it the entire clan full of morons. We used to have a lot of respect for you guys.

Fuck you, fuck off, and burn in hell.

Dude. They tried to make up a good solution with giving everything they had to segd and the druzhina clan. But instead of saying thanks for alot of xp battles you can do with Coa gear, many grey order and drz members called Segd an traitor and asshole. Rogue and his crew is not willed to hold all the fiefs, because they want to give away all the responsibilities that sticks together with this. They tried to give away and you resisted. It is your own fault, that all those troops are burned...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: ARN_ on December 14, 2013, 11:06:40 am
Dude. They tried to make up a good solution with giving everything they had to segd and the druzhina clan. But instead of saying thanks for alot of xp battles you can do with Coa gear, many grey order and drz members called Segd an traitor and asshole. Rogue and his crew is not willed to hold all the fiefs, because they want to give away all the responsibilities that sticks together with this. They tried to give away and you resisted. It is your own fault, that all those troops are burned...
What I don't understand is why they would want to give the fifes/gear/troops to the already biggest strat faction and not small clans/factions. With more small factions who are active and fight each other it would make strat a lot more interesting instead of just giving it to the big guys. Okay they can make exp battles, but let's be fair those aren't even fun. That's at least what I think
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 14, 2013, 11:10:34 am
I have been thinking about this since I first heard about it, to me its really strange. A whole year of strat or so sort of lead up to this moment - the final fight. And what happens? One side just gives in - bored? Afraid to fail? Noone in the clan wants to continue? Not even in small gruops? Small bands of people making a small faction taking one or two fiefs? No?Nothing? Zip nada? Did they get the question from their bored superiors?? Why were there noone interessted? No insight into clan matters? No chance to decide anything in the clan?

IF a new strat comes, and if the Coalition will be in it - please please please let some other guys rule the clan in strat. Guys that arent tired, old in strat, set in their ways, has no prestige to loose and have everything to win. Guys that might actually do something other than defending. No old grudges from past strats, and only eager and willingness to fight and crush their enemies. Hope that goes for a lot of clans out there - let the new guys take some of the action - let a new generation of people lead your clans. Oldies its time you step down from your thrones and let some new and fresh energy into your clans so that the next strat can be more flexible.

I ofc doesnt know exactly what has happened in coalition - I might be totally wrong - then I apologize. But I dont say this only to the coalition - stratveterans in general should let the new generation have a try. And to all you "newcomers" - take part and act on your gut - strat isnt exactly rocketscience - its a strategygame - start playing the game instead of sitting around doing. Find a couple of mates and try your luck - at best it will work out - at worst you would have had some fun together.

Fiefs are abundant and so is silver, there is no better chance than now - take your shot and leave your old heavy, boring stratclans.

Wessex is a fine example - Osiris left the mercs in strat - got a one man faction, managed to get a poorly defended fief and I guess Osiris hasnt had this much fun in strat in a long time.

 
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 14, 2013, 11:40:58 am
How much do you offer for troops,gear and silver? :P
Nothing myself, I do however know plenty of people who pay like 1lp per 1k-2k troops.
(offering 100k gold for 100k strat troops fully geared)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 14, 2013, 12:43:08 pm
1. Noone from Greys called Segd traitor or collaborateur.
2. We are grateful for trying to save resources.
3. For all this shit I blame only one person. Rogue - you stinking coward and murder!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: tizzango on December 14, 2013, 12:55:07 pm
Guys that arent tired, old in strat, set in their ways, has no prestige to loose and have everything to win. Guys that might actually do something other than defending. No old grudges from past strats, and only eager and willingness to fight and crush their enemies.

+1

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Perverz on December 14, 2013, 12:55:51 pm
  Rogue - you stinking coward !

hey moron what part you didnt understand? they are inactive!!!!!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 14, 2013, 01:13:11 pm
Wow harpag and erasmas, I thought you guys were allright, but being this butthurt and offensive because somebody decides to stop wasting his time on a online game and put it in things that matter like family and friends...
I get that you guys are disappointed, but don't  you maybe think that what you are writing here just goes a liiiittle bit over the top?

It's a game and I suggest you sleep some nights over this before making an even bigger dick out of yourself. Insulting Rogue won't bring him back or make him change his mind, sadly because he was great at what he did.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 14, 2013, 01:15:13 pm
hey moron what part you didnt understand? they are inactive!!!!!

Provocation succeed :mrgreen:   Prepare your anus  :twisted:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Franke on December 14, 2013, 01:21:10 pm
Nikodin, I do not know it is only you who is a selfish, egocentric idiot, or if it the entire clan full of morons. We used to have a lot of respect for you guys.

Fuck you, fuck off, and burn in hell.

1. Noone from Greys called Segd traitor or collaborateur.
2. We are grateful for trying to save resources.
3. For all this shit I blame only one person. Rogue - you stinking coward and murder!

Keep it coming guys, that's exactly what I expected.

One thing to add to what Niko wrote: It has never been in discussion that "HRE dies" or dissolves or whatever. There just won't be any organised Strat play from the Coalition. Those of us who have een playing Crpg will still do so.

And for Grandmom:
We did not ask our members before we took this step, actually I learned about this plan roughly one hour before the last attack on Narra myself, it was all planned by Rogue and Segd. You may call this undemocratic (which I can understand) but you do not know how few people there were/are in HRE who still give a fuck about Strat. I was Lord of Narra. I had like 20 Coalition members sitting in there who were more or less inactive, the most they could be arsed to do was transferring troops all 2 or 3 days in the best case. Finding someone to carry stuff from there to another destination was already hard enough before UIF came arouond and took our villages. After the loss of our villages it was even harder because the guy had to be on and check the map more often instead of just giving a movement order and then not caring for another day or two.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 14, 2013, 01:23:43 pm
Wow harpag and erasmas, I thought you guys were allright, but being this butthurt and offensive because somebody decides to stop wasting his time on a online game and put it in things that matter like family and friends...
I get that you guys are disappointed, but don't  you maybe think that what you are writing here just goes a liiiittle bit over the top?

It's a game and I suggest you sleep some nights over this before making an even bigger dick out of yourself. Insulting Rogue won't bring him back or make him change his mind, sadly because he was great at what he did.

And now quite seriously. Zero RP or drama. It's not about being inactive, it's about manner of leave that round. Don't be mad.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 01:35:24 pm
Exactly. Noone will stop you if you want to quit strat. It is sad, but we all wave you goodbye.  The problem is that you want to burn everything behind you. Wasting tickets - well, its a waste, but these are your tickets to do whatever you want.

Respec of fiefs is different story though. You will gain nothing, but noone will be able to take over and use them in decent manner for a looong time. The disproportion between burned fief and a good one is enormous. That is selfish and shows that is is not about quitting - it is about ruining game for others.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 14, 2013, 01:35:40 pm

And for Grandmom:
(click to show/hide)

I know the feeling, and the mood within a clan that has 95% of the members not caring. Why? Cant you remember the feeling of strategus in the beginning when you started to understand things - the fun, the excitement of your first battle, your first war - the first time in a strategus battle. The first time you commanded a battle, first rollcall. The cheer in the ts when your clan won its first flagcap or took its first castle. This is what drives the people in a clan, this is what gives them energy and willingness. The perfect way to kill that energy is to just not make the guys active parts of the clan or grow to the clan to big and just hand out orders like its a single player game.

When the situation is like u describe it, its way past time to change leadership to someone with more energy that can boost the clan - to create a common goal that the team will fight for.

And yes, the decision to do what your clan did was not very democratic, but thats not my business in which way Coa rules its "bots".

If any scandivian people would like to continue participating in a clan with energy, where the members matter and where they are not only allowed to but will in some way be forced to act by voting on different things that is important to the clan - feel free to contact us.

And if you are not scandinavian - feel free to join us anyway

Btw - did I tell you we are going to war today? 16000 men marching as we speak  8-)

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Osiris on December 14, 2013, 01:39:25 pm
I know the feeling, and the mood within a clan that has 95% of the members not caring. Why? Cant you remember the feeling of strategus in the beginning when you started to understand things - the fun, the excitement of your first battle, your first war - the first time in a strategus battle. The first time you commanded a battle, first rollcall. The cheer in the ts when your clan won its first flagcap or took its first castle. This is what drives the people in a clan, this is what gives them energy and willingness. The perfect way to kill that energy is to just not make the guys active parts of the clan or grow to the clan to big and just hand out orders like its a single player game.

When the situation is like u describe it, its way past time to change leadership to someone with more energy that can boost the clan - to create a common goal that the team will fight for.

And yes, the decision to do what your clan did was not very democratic, but thats not my business in which way Coa rules its "bots".

If any scandivian people would like to continue participating in a clan with energy, where the members matter and where they are not only allowed to but will in some way be forced to act by voting on different things that is important to the clan - feel free to contact us.

And if you are not scandinavian - feel free to join us anyway

Btw - did I tell you we are going to war today? 16000 men marching as we speak  8-)

First battle etc for wessex was fun :D cant say the rollcalls ever got me excited :P
Coalition has sat in the east for a long time doing nothing and that kind of activity kills clans, but you cant really blame just them. XP battles was a nice idea but without an actual goal its just high exp TDM which i find tedious.

Any stragglers are welcome in the volitile north west where all the action seems to be. come as independents or join a faction its all good. Now just dont send 16000 kalmars at me ive got enough scandis :D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Franke on December 14, 2013, 02:01:54 pm
Supporting a smaller clan/ several small clans was an option that had been discussed on another occasion before but we all expected such a clan being stomped over by the UIF or threatened into joining their block (or voluntarily joining them) like some of the clans that had been allied to us actually did during this round.

We are now hostile to the UIF for three Strat rounds or so (correct me if I'm wrong) and the only way to counter the UIF threat (as we regarded it) was in our eyes to join the carebearing by creating our own large block - this is how the idea of "The Coalition" has been born.
Having several smaller factions would have been a charming idea but we expected nothing less than to be swalloed/wiped one after another. Creating one big faction seemed to be safer and easier (in terms of coordination) but, as Grandmom correctly stated, it killed individualism. At some point of the current round I really envied Grey Order as they never seemed to run out of minions to do trade runs, lead armies or run fiefs because they attracted so many people due to the benefits of playing under their banner on EU2.

Grandmom: I think our only active Scandinavian is Tindel, we tried our best to "germanize" him, but he remains a Swede. Maybe you are more succesful with all those Finnish Fallen members.

I will not completely abandon Strat, I was just tired of sitting in a town for months doing nothing than making lists of items and poking people to move around and buy stuff. I was able to get a destrier and fill my saddle bags with some gold. Maybe I will ride west. I heard tales of several small kingdoms there. Maybe they can offer hospitality to an exiled HRE nobleman?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 14, 2013, 02:15:03 pm
Just transfered last fief back to COA. DRZ now officially don't have any COA property.
Question: where are these tickets? We are talking about at least 120k , and most likely much more .
200k+  :rolleyes:
Noone from Greys called Segd traitor or collaborateur.
Yep. You could blame me or Rogue, or everybody else for burning tickets, but I will blame this ppl with whom I played for 3 years in one clan & because of whom I'm leaving Druzhina: Druzhina_Archer_KMC, Druzhina_RXN, Druzhina_Noobsaibot. Let their ping be always high.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 14, 2013, 02:21:25 pm
Maybe they can offer hospitality to an exiled HRE nobleman?

Make your way to Reindi castle m8 - join our teamspeak - it will be full tonight I assure you - BUT leave your grudges and old strats behind - bring nothing but the the will to have an adventure and some fun......and make no mistake - we are more organised than germans :wink:

And never try to germanize a swede - he will just look at you and laugh and mark you with a diagnosis of some sort  :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Varadin on December 14, 2013, 02:25:46 pm
Support to the HRE and mighty Rogue and Franke  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 14, 2013, 02:43:48 pm
1. cant say the rollcalls ever got me excited :P
2. Coalition has sat in the east for a long time doing nothing and that kind of activity kills clans, but you cant really blame just them.
3. Now just dont send 16000 kalmars at me ive got enough scandis :D

1. The first time you got accepted into a BIG battle you were chewing on your own pants - admit it  :mrgreen:
2. Yes I can - who else should I blame?
3. We hear the women in Saren are particulary nice looking and also quite willing (not that it matters) so we thought our guys should get a fair share of some of that Saren-booty. Nah, wouldnt need 16k for raping your hairy ladies in Saren Osiris - we will try and make some fun battles for us and the community (and hope to gain something out of it aswell)

Hell, even the priests from Scandinavia has joined in n this holy march
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Lt_Anders on December 14, 2013, 02:52:07 pm
So, in the end, the big eastern blocks can't play strat anymore. Actually, this was probably the best way to screw over GO/DRZ ever. No battle, no fiefs, just a giant FUCK YOU, BYE!

COA wins strat, end of story.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Perverz on December 14, 2013, 03:07:43 pm
Provocation succeed :mrgreen:   Prepare your anus  :twisted:

done! i just come from toalet, wash your tongue :*
btw find me on eu1 since lots of us dont care about strat and im not even in clan on strat since its anoying to check page every hour ;)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: _RXN_ on December 14, 2013, 03:27:32 pm
What a drama! *popcorn*
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: okiN on December 14, 2013, 03:38:02 pm
wat
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Fips on December 14, 2013, 04:22:49 pm
I'm completely behind the decisions made by Rogue and Segd in this matter. The fact that people COMPLAINED about us making fun battles for experience for all the players boggles my mind.

First you complain for over half a year that COA isn't active enough, then when we finally decide to do something about our tickets just sitting in our fiefs in a way that favours not only DRZ and COA but everyone who wanted to join in, you still COMPLAIN. There are many reasons why we would quit strategus, but apparently this bullshit you pulled now was the final straw to break the camel's back.
The idea to quit strategus isn't exactly a new idea to coalition. The fact that you get roflstomped by huge alliances for almost 3 years, getting backstabbed by your own, isn't something that makes you want to keep playing this game. It's true, this time we did a lot better, but in the end the numbers are still in favour of our enemies for the same damn reasons they were in the last strat rounds. The idea of taking all our tickets and gold to NA to stir some shit up over there would probably have been the best solution, because no matter what COA does on EU, it's all bullshit EVEN IF YOU GET FREE XP. At least NA has better drama than EU.

You gotta blame this on yourself, GO. Couldn't just be happy with us making xp-battles. Poor suckers =P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rogue on December 14, 2013, 04:35:30 pm
Wow you sure have a very efficient way to convince other people of your viewpoint Harpag & Erasmas, with your random flaming and insulting.

We contemplated leaving Strat for a long time now. Ever since the onset of the "Great Inactivity" during the summer month we have been in steady decline. All the resources in the world won't do you much good if you have no one left to move armies or do any other kind of work in Strat. Covering our fiefs with at least semi-inactive, partially reachable guys was a challenge. In the end the sole soul still moving on the map and doing stuff was Nikdoin. Some fresh blood tried to rise, were tutored and groomed and inevitably burned out, some really fast. The main burden of work, for over a year, was carried by the same few guys, whose main motivation was to keep on going since so much work has already been invested.

With that background an exit plan was devised. The options we had were rather simple: roll over and go inactive and let our enemies take all our stuff for free, like Mercs and Templars did. We wanted to avoid that, until we decide to go we wanted to resist as best as we can, which we did quite well. Give all our stuff away to friends, there was basically no one left. We considered moving it to NA and giving it to FCC, but with so few guys, so much stuff and later so many enemies walking around this was not really feasible. In the end we decided on erasing everything we have and just disappear. This plan was to set in motion once even the most hardcore guys finally had enough.

After around one month of brutal fighting our foes ceased to attack, we can't blame them for that. Attacking the same fucking place 10+ times in a row with still flowing reinforcements and a basically unlimited enemy stockpile, it gets boring and frustrating. We call that the Uxkhal syndrome. It is more a flaw in the game than a lack of resolve in the factions.
About a month after even our most eager foes ceased to attack us the idea was born to turn at least some of our resources into XP, converting everything would probably too long. We offered this option to DRZ, GO and Shu Han. GO wanted to kill us in the classic way and even told us what they wanted to try next, dance with our cities. I can respect that, although we are not here to provide the antagonist for what they consider the most fun for them. Shu Han thought we are afraid, but they are rather silly anyway. DRZ eagerly accepted our proposal and after initial fights plans were hatched to enlarge and speed up the process, enhanced by plans to just fight ourselves for XP. Lack of our most valuable resource, active strat players, and pressing needs poor Nikodin had to attend delayed all this.

Then came the expected GO assault on our cities and what we expected to be an almost untakeable fortress turned out to be a craphole with really bad flag distribution. The prospect of fighting a 2-3 hour battle at least a week or more, where the primary strategy consists of a dance around the respawn timer was the final nail in the coffin. The remaining active Strat leaders, Nikodin, Dark and me decided it is time to quit. Instead of going with the origjnal old plan we offered some our stuff to DRZ to turn into XP. They have proven to be our most relaxed adversaries, with Segd and Vovka being cool guys and their proven utter trustworthiness (we let them spawncap one of our castles to save their tickets), this was logical choice. Segd suggested to go way beyond what we had in mind and to give them basically all we had. We agreed.

Unfortunately not being a die-hard hatemonger and taking stuff from an opponent who wishes to leave anyway is treason for some people. At first I thought Segd was making a joke when he told me about it the next day. I still can't wrap my head around why someone could think like this. Cold war much?

It is a testament to Segds integrity that he even handed all the stuff back, which we immediately submitted to the old exit plan. The fires burned hot. Respeccing was not even part of that plan, until you whined so eloquently about it, not that it matters anyway. All fiefs will be taken over until the seven days are up. This was a mute point to begin with, but hey at least you get worked up about it enough to spew more nonsense and random insults.

Another point worth adressing: giving everything to smaller factions. We could have tried that true. But first of all we would not just hand our resources over to anyone, first choice would have been friends like FCC & Bros. Logistical problems ruled out NA and Bros didn't even want Tulga with everything inside. Individually handing it out to smaller guys is way too much of a hassle and would take too long to be feasible. Once it became obvious what we were up to it was likely we would get attacked to claim a piece of the cake. Fighting more battles was something we wanted to avoid. It's not like anyone is entitled to our stuff anyway and we already tried leaving it all behind to be turned into XP.

All the guessing about the inner workings of our faction is silly. Fancy theories but nothing more and it is easy to parade the flag of activity for people who barely played a third of the round in a position of responsibility. This strat round is just way too long with next to no support for bugs, imbalances and glitches. It should have ended 5-6 month ago with the onset of the great inactivity.

And for everyone hating on us and because I love quoting myself:

Quote
[...]in the end we don't really give a fuck about what anyone of you writes or thinks anyway. 





Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: ARN_ on December 14, 2013, 04:39:47 pm
I'm completely behind the decisions made by Rogue and Segd in this matter. The fact that people COMPLAINED about us making fun battles for experience for all the players boggles my mind.

First you complain for over half a year that COA isn't active enough, then when we finally decide to do something about our tickets just sitting in our fiefs in a way that favours not only DRZ and COA but everyone who wanted to join in, you still COMPLAIN. There are many reasons why we would quit strategus, but apparently this bullshit you pulled now was the final straw to break the camel's back.
The idea to quit strategus isn't exactly a new idea to coalition. The fact that you get roflstomped by huge alliances for almost 3 years, getting backstabbed by your own, isn't something that makes you want to keep playing this game. It's true, this time we did a lot better, but in the end the numbers are still in favour of our enemies for the same damn reasons they were in the last strat rounds. The idea of taking all our tickets and gold to NA to stir some shit up over there would probably have been the best solution, because no matter what COA does on EU, it's all bullshit EVEN IF YOU GET FREE XP. At least NA has better drama than EU.

You gotta blame this on yourself, GO. Couldn't just be happy with us making xp-battles. Poor suckers =P
Maybe the people don't just want free exp, maybe they want war, drama and epic battles, not just running around in plate and random spam a flamberge. That's at least what I play strat for
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 14, 2013, 04:42:39 pm
Things like this should actually motivate the DEVS to release a new patch with some major changes to both c-rpg and strat.

Come on dudes, the mod is really dying this time and you simply don`t give a fuck.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: ARN_ on December 14, 2013, 04:47:48 pm
Things like this should actually motivate the DEVS to release a new patch with some major changes to both c-rpg and strat.

Come on dudes, the mod is really dying this time and you simply don`t give a fuck.
If they don't do anything very soon I vote for Panos to become the new crpg master dev, he atleast care about the mod
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 14, 2013, 04:57:31 pm

All the guessing about the inner workings of our faction is silly. Fancy theories but nothing more and it is easy to parade the flag of activity for people who barely played a third of the round in a position of responsibility.

And for everyone hating on us and because I love quoting myself:


Guess thats me, not sure though since you arent clear but it fits kinda the things I wrote - ur right I dont know what its like to have a position of responsability for a longer period (in strat) - and I never will - I will let go long before I get burned out, loose interesst or energy to lead. Easy to say, perhaps harder to do - but I know when to call it quits.

Its a game, you made ur choice and Im fine with it - lets move on.....WAR ANYONE??  8-)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 05:04:37 pm
...

Rogue (and dear HRE in general), I totally understand your point of view. It is a good explanation, and I buy it. I respect you want to quit - do it if that is your choice.

My personal opinion is that this whole story with Segd did not turn out well, and should end differently. As far as I do not like the idea of XP battles (for reasons I will explain later), it aimed in civilized resolution of your exit. Fine by me. 

I only appeal to your decency. Do not burn the fiefs. Do not respec them . You wish to exit, fine. But someone may want to take over the abandoned locations. If you burn them they will be unusable for a long time. And contrary to what some of you may think (hello, no_rules), we want someone to take them over in good shape - to grow there, become strong and powerful, so that we can have another war. Real war, not phony themed battle.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 14, 2013, 05:49:38 pm
... to grow there, become strong and powerful, so that we can have another war. Real war, not phony themed battle.
That would only make sense when you guys too, would burn your shit and start over. Otherwise you will stay in the Overlord thrown.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rogue on December 14, 2013, 05:51:11 pm
As I already said, even those few fiefs which are in the process of respeccing won't last the required seven days. This is completely mute point.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 06:22:14 pm
Maybe they will, maybe not. I hope they will. Just don't do it in the first place - its is really useless for you, and ruins game for others (not only GO). It so petty, you know...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 14, 2013, 06:24:35 pm
As I already said, even those few fiefs which are in the process of respeccing won't last the required seven days. This is completely mute point.
While true, i am not sure we all shouldnt do that freely anyways .. *sigh* i know i dont have a fief ^^ rigth now, still, take me out of the equation and if you still want to have a reset, the closest to it aslong not done by devs, would need to come from us.

EDIT:
Maybe they will, maybe not. I hope they will. Just don't do it in the first place - its is really useless for you, and ruins game for others (not only GO). It so petty, you know...
a) you may not want HRE to do it, still you have no ground to ask for it, their choice
b) anyone who would take that stuff, surly would have less ressources to use, and also likely not that accustomed to Strategus, how much time would you give them to build up? a week a month , 3 months? Before you decide lets rape em. Those who come afterwards there, wont meassure with Coa , not in member count, in experience ... so they wont be worthy opponents in comparison to the old well suited GO or is it only to stroke the epen ...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 06:48:42 pm
a) you may not want HRE to do it, still you have no ground to ask for it, their choice
b) anyone who would take that stuff, surly would have less ressources to use, and also likely not that accustomed to Strategus, how much time would you give them to build up? a week a month , 3 months? Before you decide lets rape em. Those who come afterwards there, wont measure with Coa , not in member count, in experience ... so they wont be worthy opponents in comparison to the old well suited GO or is it only to stroke the epen ...

Kinn, I am NOT talking about troops or EQ - it is a waste, but that's Coalition's stuff. If they want chop that and eat for dinner - that is their choice. I am talking about respec of fiefs. It will ruin these fiefs forever. They will never again reach the level of non-respecced ones.  Whoever takes them over will have a fucked up start.

As to the second point - maybe you are right, maybe not. Things do not last not forever. The only way to check it is to give it a try. And I am only asking for a decent fresh start for a newcomers. Don't you think we all do have a right to ask Coalition for that?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: jtobiasm on December 14, 2013, 07:10:31 pm
It's either join grey order side and or get wiped, this is probably why people can't be arsed.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 14, 2013, 07:35:56 pm
It is not. But - thank you  :oops:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rebelyell on December 14, 2013, 07:56:00 pm
it is truly time to reset strat
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Fips on December 14, 2013, 08:07:09 pm
it is truly time to reset strat

It still gonna be the same thing all over again. I have been member in HRE for 3 strategus rounds now and as long as UIF consists of DRZ and GO there will never be a change in the outcome of the game. Because sooner or later smaller clans will always join in on the big UIF to rape everyone else on the map. This time around with the initial Anti-UIF we could have even had a fair chance to wipe out UIF, but we all know how that turned out, don't we my dear (ex-)wolves?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Flans on December 14, 2013, 08:13:42 pm
Yeah we do you let us to fight for ourselfs with no roster help, Greys helped with that and now we help them in war vs coa which sadly ended fast.  And you can again cry how kinn back stabbed you all and how he is the big bad wolf    and all that but the wolves were not under him for that war and still no help.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 14, 2013, 08:20:00 pm
It still gonna be the same thing all over again. I have been member in HRE for 3 strategus rounds now and as long as UIF consists of DRZ and GO there will never be a change in the outcome of the game. Because sooner or later smaller clans will always join in on the big UIF to rape everyone else on the map. This time around with the initial Anti-UIF we could have even had a fair chance to wipe out UIF, but we all know how that turned out, don't we my dear (ex-)wolves?
You can't possibly blame anyone for wanting to wipe you and mercs out, maybe if you weren't huge jerkoffs people wouldn't support UIF in that, even funnier is you blaming Wolves, mercs struck first, and besides that, merc leadership personally told me that you and them were planning on wiping out wolves first thing if you managed to defeat UIF. Literally every small clan leader I know sided against you not because they wanted to join the winning team, heck you guys were winning for a period, they joined against you because they either hated Kapikulu, Mercs, or HRE/Fallen, OR because you guys were "bullying" them on strat. Nordmen joined the UIF side because mercs were jerkoffs, Shu Han joined the UIF side seriously because you didn't let them fight a private war with Crusaders when UIF was inactive, Wolves were planning on attacking mercs because you were gonna wipe them after UIF, but mercs struck first and then they actively supported UIF, half of the smaller clans that sided with UIF did so because you guys are dicks, not because they wanted to join the big UIF to rape everyone else on the map.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 14, 2013, 08:27:02 pm
Yeah we do you let us to fight for ourselfs with no roster help

You are from United Kingdom, yet you fail to write proper English.

hahaha what an illeterature punk
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: jtobiasm on December 14, 2013, 08:29:51 pm
You are from United Kingdom, yet you fail to write proper English.

hahaha what an illeterature punk

he talks like a div anorl
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 14, 2013, 08:31:06 pm
...This time around with the initial Anti-UIF we could have even had a fair chance to wipe out UIF, but we all know how that turned out, don't we my dear (ex-)wolves?
1) Mercs tricking me into attacking Ottomans, while staying out of that and gaining fiefs for free
2) ShuHan attacking Templars, myself not possible to reinforce because bound in Ottoamn area, Mercs not helping because afk, not much different with Coa, therefor Templars getting wiped in Yalen Area + fucked up Yalen town battle ^*sigh*
3) after several other things where Mercs broke word, me getting all railed up and shitposting in forum, Mercs using that as excuse to attack together with Steel Axis whihc had been a member of CFA and also joining the bandwagon BlackFist and later on Coa
All failing badly in taking down CFA or getting a diplomacy going, that partly as i was told because it was torpedod by Kapikulu or lets say grudges which led to that, i always told my guys dont insult the lads, but when i see still nowadays people writing "krapikulu" and similar insults, i know why that diplomacy efforts went sideways.
=> eastern block fail
=> GO advancing, DRZ advancing

@Zlisch
not planning nor doing or actually attacking, but beeing prepared for anything, that also by asking who would be on board. Not actually going through with an attack nore having a start date with a plan at hand to attack mercs, but again prepared for the worst case scenario .... getting attacked by them. Well as it turned out Mercs had been a paper tiger, lots of talking ... lots of really good single players .. but not really interested into the common goal back then of the Eastern block, otherwise they would have seen that Wolves till i got my anger attack,

did everything what was expected from them and me and more, so Fips fuck off with your implications.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 14, 2013, 08:34:15 pm
he talks like a div anorl

more like a ret ard  :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: witchhunter on December 14, 2013, 08:56:58 pm
You ...

how nice of you to clear out everything considering you have been there all the time, know all secrets/facts and have been mediating all the talks that occured.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Rogue on December 14, 2013, 08:59:41 pm
Ah I see this topic managed to return to the core of all diplomacy forum posts: "NO U!"  :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Darkoveride on December 14, 2013, 09:27:30 pm
None of this would of happened if you would of left bubastan alone. :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: BlindGuy on December 14, 2013, 09:46:04 pm
And this ladies and gentlemen is what happens when children are given keyboards.


This thread is about one thing: DRZ/Coalition anouncing they gonna give everyone loads of free xp. Everything else is so uninportant and trivial, honestly guys: WE WERE ALL PLAYING A GAME, just take a deep breath, relax, let it go.

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 14, 2013, 10:10:11 pm
Wow you sure have a very efficient way to convince other people of your viewpoint Harpag & Erasmas, with your random flaming and insulting.

We contemplated leaving Strat for a long time now. Ever since the onset of the "Great Inactivity" during the summer month we have been in steady decline. All the resources in the world won't do you much good if you have no one left to move armies or do any other kind of work in Strat. Covering our fiefs with at least semi-inactive, partially reachable guys was a challenge. In the end the sole soul still moving on the map and doing stuff was Nikdoin. Some fresh blood tried to rise, were tutored and groomed and inevitably burned out, some really fast. The main burden of work, for over a year, was carried by the same few guys, whose main motivation was to keep on going since so much work has already been invested.

With that background an exit plan was devised. The options we had were rather simple: roll over and go inactive and let our enemies take all our stuff for free, like Mercs and Templars did. We wanted to avoid that, until we decide to go we wanted to resist as best as we can, which we did quite well. Give all our stuff away to friends, there was basically no one left. We considered moving it to NA and giving it to FCC, but with so few guys, so much stuff and later so many enemies walking around this was not really feasible. In the end we decided on erasing everything we have and just disappear. This plan was to set in motion once even the most hardcore guys finally had enough.

After around one month of brutal fighting our foes ceased to attack, we can't blame them for that. Attacking the same fucking place 10+ times in a row with still flowing reinforcements and a basically unlimited enemy stockpile, it gets boring and frustrating. We call that the Uxkhal syndrome. It is more a flaw in the game than a lack of resolve in the factions.
About a month after even our most eager foes ceased to attack us the idea was born to turn at least some of our resources into XP, converting everything would probably too long. We offered this option to DRZ, GO and Shu Han. GO wanted to kill us in the classic way and even told us what they wanted to try next, dance with our cities. I can respect that, although we are not here to provide the antagonist for what they consider the most fun for them. Shu Han thought we are afraid, but they are rather silly anyway. DRZ eagerly accepted our proposal and after initial fights plans were hatched to enlarge and speed up the process, enhanced by plans to just fight ourselves for XP. Lack of our most valuable resource, active strat players, and pressing needs poor Nikodin had to attend delayed all this.

Then came the expected GO assault on our cities and what we expected to be an almost untakeable fortress turned out to be a craphole with really bad flag distribution. The prospect of fighting a 2-3 hour battle at least a week or more, where the primary strategy consists of a dance around the respawn timer was the final nail in the coffin. The remaining active Strat leaders, Nikodin, Dark and me decided it is time to quit. Instead of going with the origjnal old plan we offered some our stuff to DRZ to turn into XP. They have proven to be our most relaxed adversaries, with Segd and Vovka being cool guys and their proven utter trustworthiness (we let them spawncap one of our castles to save their tickets), this was logical choice. Segd suggested to go way beyond what we had in mind and to give them basically all we had. We agreed.

Unfortunately not being a die-hard hatemonger and taking stuff from an opponent who wishes to leave anyway is treason for some people. At first I thought Segd was making a joke when he told me about it the next day. I still can't wrap my head around why someone could think like this. Cold war much?

It is a testament to Segds integrity that he even handed all the stuff back, which we immediately submitted to the old exit plan. The fires burned hot. Respeccing was not even part of that plan, until you whined so eloquently about it, not that it matters anyway. All fiefs will be taken over until the seven days are up. This was a mute point to begin with, but hey at least you get worked up about it enough to spew more nonsense and random insults.

Another point worth adressing: giving everything to smaller factions. We could have tried that true. But first of all we would not just hand our resources over to anyone, first choice would have been friends like FCC & Bros. Logistical problems ruled out NA and Bros didn't even want Tulga with everything inside. Individually handing it out to smaller guys is way too much of a hassle and would take too long to be feasible. Once it became obvious what we were up to it was likely we would get attacked to claim a piece of the cake. Fighting more battles was something we wanted to avoid. It's not like anyone is entitled to our stuff anyway and we already tried leaving it all behind to be turned into XP.

All the guessing about the inner workings of our faction is silly. Fancy theories but nothing more and it is easy to parade the flag of activity for people who barely played a third of the round in a position of responsibility. This strat round is just way too long with next to no support for bugs, imbalances and glitches. It should have ended 5-6 month ago with the onset of the great inactivity.

And for everyone hating on us and because I love quoting myself:

blah blah blah - Rogue - you can say whatever you wish, you can even write a book about it, but don't try complicate simple things. When a single person decides to stop playing, doing topic on forum, gives to friends or strangers looms and gold, and then deletes character. Strategus is completely different caliber - it's collective work of many people, but you decide cancel this "multicharacter" without donate looms and gold. I'm sorry, but I see it this way. I certainly understand logistical difficulties (also play this game and it's not easy ), but if someone has devoted so much time and work, could make one last effort and get out of game like a man...

...I'm disappointed because I thought that you, as most reliable from our opponents, you could predict fact that you can't invest your own time in forever and you need start "training staff " and delegate responsibilities.

Long ago I found my successor, which is much better than me, and he preparing their own successors. For over a year I'm for my faction completely useless, but I come because I like it. This is necessary, because otherwise we are just tired and frustrated as in your case...

...and don't be surprised by this "ha gaayyy for 10 hours" ( lol ) you pissed me off and in my opinion you deserve it - and don't be hysterical with these alleged insults. We know everyone here like bald horses and despite hard language we're all dudes.

What can I say at the end? Fu & take care? Fucking sad story...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: BlindGuy on December 14, 2013, 10:14:13 pm
blah blah blah

Honestly tell me: Are you actually upset because strat is the greatest achievement in your life?

Im not trying to offend you, Im actually curious.

If it is not, then WHY are you so upset?

Did you forget the part where we were playing a game?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: witchhunter on December 14, 2013, 11:41:09 pm
blah blah blah - Rogue - you can say whatever you wish, you can even write a book about it, but don't try complicate simple things. When a single person decides to stop playing, doing topic on forum, gives to friends or strangers looms and gold, and then deletes character. Strategus is completely different caliber - it's collective work of many people, but you decide cancel this "multicharacter" without donate looms and gold. I'm sorry, but I see it this way. I certainly understand logistical difficulties (also play this game and it's not easy ), but if someone has devoted so much time and work, could make one last effort and get out of game like a man...

...I'm disappointed because I thought that you, as most reliable from our opponents, you could predict fact that you can't invest your own time in forever and you need start "training staff " and delegate responsibilities.

Long ago I found my successor, which is much better than me, and he preparing their own successors. For over a year I'm for my faction completely useless, but I come because I like it. This is necessary, because otherwise we are just tired and frustrated as in your case...

...and don't be surprised by this "ha gaayyy for 10 hours" ( lol ) you pissed me off and in my opinion you deserve it - and don't be hysterical with these alleged insults. We know everyone here like bald horses and despite hard language we're all dudes.

What can I say at the end? Fu & take care? Fucking sad story...

nice you bring it back to the important point:

we were willing to do xp battles. we were willing to give our stuff to DRZ.
it was declined.

if you would actually read our posts, you would also see that it was not just rogues decision to burn it all.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Olwen on December 15, 2013, 12:06:12 am
If a fief sold popcorn in calradia, its owner would be the richest man in calradia, even richer than segd
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 15, 2013, 12:16:15 am
nice you bring it back to the important point:

we were willing to do xp battles. we were willing to give our stuff to DRZ.
it was declined.

if you would actually read our posts, you would also see that it was not just rogues decision to burn it all.

Bullshit, when DRZ declined, you could give it to just anyone, but you burned it because you wanted it. Rocketscience :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 15, 2013, 12:42:52 am
Bullshit, when DRZ declined, you could give it to just anyone, but you burned it because you wanted it. Rocketscience :rolleyes:
They would all have gone to the biggest clans anyway.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 15, 2013, 09:33:17 am
This drama is even for the kings of drama to much already...

Where is latvians TL;DR gif?

Rogue trying to make the best out of Coa leaving --> Gets called bad names (aswell as Segd, the man who wanted to have xp) ---> doesnt care

I spent some time to learn to know the UIF ts. I played with some Grey members on siege and also with some druzhina guys like bars some weeks ago. Kapikulu i know from earlier times and there are still some of them i would call friendly.
Also i am pretty known on the TS Servers of most other Clans and i have to conclude that every Clan has nice members and really really badass members.
I tried to work against this old struggle between the 2 biggest clans of strat (Coa and GO) and wanted to get some friendship between, so that we can stop doing this 2 side war and create some more diversion.

Didnt work, because both sides blocked me. *Le sad Chris*
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 15, 2013, 11:05:16 am
They would all have gone to the biggest clans anyway.

If these resources were designed for small clans, why do you wanted give it for DRZ? Do they look like small clan?  :rolleyes:

So what is going on now exactly?

Coalition giving all fiefs away without a fight to "random" other factions?

Me needs xp ...  :( :(

No one knows exactly, time will tell, but most probably strat is pretty dead...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 15, 2013, 12:09:43 pm
Noooooooo but I still need 30 million xp to get lvl 34 again  :|
501 million to 37  :shock:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Torben on December 15, 2013, 12:16:15 pm
If these resources were designed for small clans, why do you wanted give it for DRZ? Do they look like small clan?  :rolleyes:

No one knows exactly, time will tell, but most probably strat is pretty dead...


strat lives and dies with Wessex...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Butan on December 15, 2013, 02:26:22 pm

strat lives and dies with Wessex...

(click to show/hide)


You never die on strat, you only lose hope.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Torben on December 15, 2013, 02:33:53 pm

You never die on strat, you only lose hope.

let me get emo too  :mrgreen:

btw recognize that song? ^^
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 15, 2013, 02:50:18 pm
If these resources were designed for small clans, why do you wanted give it for DRZ? Do they look like small clan?  :rolleyes:
Rogue likes segd, and I guess he wanted to give it to him to keep it away from others?
He could choose between leaving them and waiting for the greys to cap the undefended castles (smaller clans would lose them instantly), give them to segd for shits ang giggles (and xp) or burn them to the ground and leave the strat map unchanged, all factions still as big as they were before, just with a 'dead zone' in between them.

I think this actually might have saved strategus if you look at it.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 15, 2013, 03:10:01 pm
Idiot. The difference between GO / DRZ and the rest of clans is now greater than ever. Am considering distribution or burning own tickets to redress the balance.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Butan on December 15, 2013, 03:12:19 pm
let me get emo too  :mrgreen:

btw recognize that song? ^^

How can I forget the shedding of manly tears listening to Fin songs  :cry:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tomas on December 15, 2013, 03:29:21 pm
Apologies for coming late to the party but figured I'd just confirm the official stance from Fallen (warning - includes some hard truths and opinions, but I'm inactive so i don't care anymore :D)

Early Strat 4 was actually quite fun.  We had an alliance similar is size to the UIF and actually looked like we would be able to fight back although we always knew and accepted that full conquest was always unlikely.  Then the fail started.

First we had Kinngrimm pulling every small clan that ever existed into his alliance thereby unofficially making them part of the Anti-UIF.  They were never part of it in our eyes and we wouldn't have lifted a finger to help them, but other small clans couldn't know this for certain and so they themselves felt the need to join the stupid block war.  It would have been nice if all these other clans had fought amongst themselves.  There was certainly enough room for it with the current Strat mechanics but unfortunately the usual paranoia kicked in.

Then we had the Templol greed in taking over Yalen.  We took and held Veluca to hinder UIF trade.  Templols took an isolated corner of the map that was completely cut off from their other fiefs for nothing other than e-peen and it cost us.

Meanwhile we had the utter lack of Merc organisation.  Haboe at least tried but I guess with it being Mercs it was always a no-win situation.  In the end the only Merc armies that made it into the Uxkhal war were the ones that Coalition members picked up and led ourselves.  When the Mercs finally did get organised they started a war with our own side instead pushing yet more clans and resources towards the UIF. 

This was quickly followed up by the utter incompetence of gifting over half the resources of the Anti-UIF to the UIF through capped fiefs.  Suddenly we went from an even footing with the UIF to being completely out-resourced.  Naturally these extra UIF resources came straight at us and we had the month of hell where it wasn't just 1 battle a night, every night like at Uxkhal, it was 2 and sometimes 3 or even 4.

Put simply - people burned out.  Moving crap around the strat map has never been fun but the XP and the battles used to make up for it.  This was no longer the case though and activity plummeted.  We tried to find new people willing to take on responsibility but they either weren't up to the task or didn't have the time for it.  This is still the case in Fallen.  We haven't had a real Leader for months now and it shows on the cRPG servers.

This is why we are burning our resources - if we try to fight on all we will be doing is feeding yet more resources to the UIF who will use them to stomp other small clans.  Giving resources to small clans would have been a nice option but quite frankly it would have been a death sentence to the clans.  The UIF would have just gone for them next and I doubt there's a small clan out there capable of actually holding onto the resources long enough to do anything with them. 


At least with Segd we were fairly certain that he would honour his agreement to use the resources on XP battles which we could join in on.  We hoped that this was a sign the the UIF was getting bored itself and starting to break up.  Maybe not to the point where they would actually attack each other, but at least to a point where they don't have to hold each others hands when taking a piss.  Clearly we were wrong.  Thanks for trying though Segd :).
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Buschtrommel on December 15, 2013, 04:17:14 pm
If these resources were designed for small clans, why do you wanted give it for DRZ? Do they look like small clan?  :rolleyes:

No one knows exactly, time will tell, but most probably strat is pretty dead...
enjoy it UIF :D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 15, 2013, 08:09:24 pm
enjoy it UIF :D
Just everyday drama

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIkPeZKP-d4

Dutch version is better though
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tactical_One on December 15, 2013, 10:52:18 pm
I was suprised because Coalition got good chance to defend themselves, loads of troops/silver /EQ , good commanding (although only one effective commander was problem i think, none can be online on every battle). I hoped there will be a lot of sieges since 1/3 role is gone. Sieges over Narra was great. I was inspired to participate as merc in such nice war efforts.
 
Fiefs will be very fast taken by different strategus forces. And there are new players on conquered teritory , and GO as promised did't took it for themselves.

KalmarUnion grow powerful and they got great active war attitude, aslike Ode (they would be great if not fact they make fief attack at morning :( knowing that deffenders dont have enough clan members to fill roster, very low style). Nordmens returned, and want to retake north. Wolves become big too, even though they did't reunite with they former leader. Fenrises don't have land but got very good players.

GO/DRZ propably lacking in purpose at moment, since only Coalition could get enough very good merc to give counterbattles. Don't think someone would be ever able to get enought resources to fight them (mayby make new free trade zone  ? :))

 
I hope that will be fight at Dhrim, and enought mercenaries will show up to defend.  Its not victory if defenders won't show up. Pls make last merc stand with good style :D

Overall strategus is intresting all the time, strat battles are pure fun (better even from exp they give), and eu1 or 2 can;t compare to organized battles.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 15, 2013, 11:13:37 pm
I love you Tactical! Optimism and hope, that is what we need in Strat now!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Casimir on December 15, 2013, 11:55:19 pm
I like turtles.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 16, 2013, 12:04:19 am
I like turtles.

We know :twisted:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: BlindGuy on December 16, 2013, 12:24:25 am
Idiot. The difference between GO / DRZ and the rest of clans is now greater than ever. Am considering distribution or burning own tickets to redress the balance.

If you really cared about having good strategus fights and not just braggin rights, you'd fight DRZ.

Remember, its a game.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 16, 2013, 02:34:53 am
If you really cared about having good strategus fights and not just braggin rights, you'd fight DRZ.

Remember, its a game.

I'll try to explain:

This war game is built on relationships and teamwork, and additionally requires motivation. You need to have an opponent and beat him on the battlefield. When you really like this guy its a bit harder treat him properly  :mrgreen:  Example from sport: boxing: before fight - severe faces with heavy look in the spotlight, then weigh, match, and finally 2 guys with broken noses hug like gays on the eyes of whole public  :lol:

I have serious concerns that our war with guys from DRZ immediately becomes a  XP war, which is dull and unattractive. Do not get me wrong, but we're friends with them for years, and will be hard to find in a "fighting spirit"  and XP itself is not enough. Call me a hater, but I think that an excess of love does not help the game, and after so many years of knowledge, it is not easy, because most of us like almost everyone. Tragedy  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Lt_Anders on December 16, 2013, 02:36:59 am
I'll try to explain:

This war game is built on relationships and teamwork, and additionally requires motivation. You need to have an opponent and beat him on the battlefield. When you really like this guy its a bit harder treat him properly  :mrgreen:  Example from sport: boxing: before fight - severe faces with heavy look in the spotlight, then weigh, match, and finally 2 guys with broken noses hug like gays on the eyes of whole public  :lol:

I have serious concerns that our war with guys from DRZ immediately becomes a  XP war, which is dull and unattractive. Do not get me wrong, but we're friends with them for years, and will be hard to find in a "fighting spirit"  and XP itself is not enough. Call me a hater, but I think that an excess of love does not help the game, and after so many years of knowledge, it is not easy, because most of us like almost everyone. Tragedy  :mrgreen:

And that, there, is the problem, sadly.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tindel on December 16, 2013, 11:01:23 am
This is great news, finally the huge vampire draining the blood of our members has been slain.
I fucking hate strategus because of the negative impact is has on our community.

Too many of our members burn out because of strat, and then they quit crpg, or they keep joining those damned strat fights and depopulating the normal servers.
 When i fire up crpg in the evening to play and EU1 has 30players EU2 has 30players and EU3 has 100players, then you know its going to be a shit evening.

This is me hoping that i will see my friends come chill on TS and play just for fun, its been so long since we had more than 5-6 HRE online together.

And from my point of view, its really fun to see you UIF's raging about this, dont you fucking understand you brought this onto yourselves?
I know its a common tactic to bring friends to win a fight with superior numbers, but that shit doesnt work so well in a computer game, cause the underdog side will be tired of unfair situations and do something else.

Too many banners on a server just causes to opposition to find other things to do with their time, we all know this. But its different with crpg because there isnt any time investment, strat is a huge timesucking vampire bitch.

So come come to EU2, we havent had 100players there for sooooooo looooong.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 16, 2013, 12:59:42 pm
Hey Tindel - I like sincerity in your post - without any nonsense and scamming. That is your opinion and there is nothing to talk about. I respect that. It is a pity that in contrast to you, your leaders do not know how to speak with a human voice.

We hope to see many of  "yellow bastards" on EU2. Without you, this game is not the same.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 16, 2013, 03:41:19 pm
This is great news, finally the huge vampire draining the blood of our members has been slain.
I fucking hate strategus because of the negative impact is has on our community.

Too many of our members burn out because of strat, and then they quit crpg, or they keep joining those damned strat fights and depopulating the normal servers.
 When i fire up crpg in the evening to play and EU1 has 30players EU2 has 30players and EU3 has 100players, then you know its going to be a shit evening.

This is me hoping that i will see my friends come chill on TS and play just for fun, its been so long since we had more than 5-6 HRE online together.

And from my point of view, its really fun to see you UIF's raging about this, dont you fucking understand you brought this onto yourselves?
I know its a common tactic to bring friends to win a fight with superior numbers, but that shit doesnt work so well in a computer game, cause the underdog side will be tired of unfair situations and do something else.

Too many banners on a server just causes to opposition to find other things to do with their time, we all know this. But its different with crpg because there isnt any time investment, strat is a huge timesucking vampire bitch.

So come come to EU2, we havent had 100players there for sooooooo looooong.
One of the least shitty posts in strat diplomacy history.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 16, 2013, 05:41:07 pm
Hey Tindel - I like sincerity in your post - without any nonsense and scamming.
That is how i also percieve rogue, rough on the edges but a straight shooter, i think you both have more incommen then you comfortably would like to admit  :wink: then again, i wasnt there in strategus 1 and dont really know how the feude between UIF and Fallen(HRE/GK) started. Anyone care to give a history lesson on that? Anything sinister in that tale? come on give me jucy story  :lol:

That is your opinion and there is nothing to talk about. I respect that. It is a pity that in contrast to you, your leaders do not know how to speak with a human voice.
a bit harsh, only because they are not all continously flaming rage goblins  :mrgreen: doenst exclude their empathy or ability to understand your point of view, though i guess they still have a different one.

We hope to see many of  "yellow bastards" on EU2. Without you, this game is not the same.
That notion i fullheartedly support

...
I fucking hate strategus because of the negative impact is has on our community.
+1, i may but clarify with "our" i imply all of the cRPG community, as there are many game mechanics which lead to missunderstandings or can be used to fuck people over(late night attacks, item bombing, huge factions controlling mostly everything, bug aboozing, multiaccounting, account sharing, ... )

Too many of our members burn out because of strat, and then they quit crpg, or they keep joining those damned strat fights and depopulating the normal servers.
When i fire up crpg in the evening to play and EU1 has 30 players EU2 has 30players and EU3 has 100players, then you know its going to be a shit evening.

This is me hoping that i will see my friends come chill on TS and play just for fun, its been so long since we had more than 5-6 HRE online together.
We have a Sunday implemented for regular casual eu1/eu2 server play, yesterday i and other Fenris took part in a Strategus fight, but several were not taken into it. Therefor they again went somewhere alone. From now on, i intend that Fenris wont participate to merc within strat battles on Sundays, erm well ... aslong we are not getting attacked ^^ ourselves. Point is, you can try and make your own rules and stick with them to protect your own community.


...

Too many banners on a server just causes to opposition to find other things to do with their time, we all know this.
...
imagine how the small clans with 5 to 30 members must feel, seeing factions or single clans with member counts like those of GO/DRZ/Coa. From my first time i joined Strategus in 2.0, all i approached wanted allies or corporation partners formost, not friends. Friendships may develop, but it starts with the need to unify against others. I was in 2.0 insulted by Risen, treated like an insect by Byzantium, arrogance and an effort to control from Fallen and in the end i partnered up like in a buisness arrangement with mercs. All those had been there in Strategus 1.0, all of them acted already like they are the gods and i need to kiss the floor on which they are walking. Then again, i was new to strategus and didnt know half of what i know now, but atmospere often was always supesious/paranoid touch and partly even hostile towards a clan who just was joining Strategus teh very first time.
Small clans which were working with me in 4.0, i told, sure you can try to get bigger and bigger, been there done that, but over that you will loose something too.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 16, 2013, 06:23:54 pm
That is how i also percieve rogue, rough on the edges but a straight shooter, i think you both have more incommen then you comfortably would like to admit  :wink:

Oh, does it mean Rouge is an animal disguised in human skin as well?  :D :D :D :D

then again, i wasnt there in strategus 1 and dont really know how the feude between UIF and Fallen(HRE/GK) started. Anyone care to give a history lesson on that? Anything sinister in that tale? come on give me jucy story

Fallen is an old story, dating strat I or II,  can't recall. HRE/GK is a bit fresher.  Nothing sinister or juicy, really. Maybe except them being stack of douchebags  :D :D :D Read Harpag's post carefully - he got the point I guess...

I'll try to explain:

This war game is built on relationships and teamwork, and additionally requires motivation. You need to have an opponent and beat him on the battlefield. When you really like this guy its a bit harder treat him properly  :mrgreen:  Example from sport: boxing: before fight - severe faces with heavy look in the spotlight, then weigh, match, and finally 2 guys with broken noses hug like gays on the eyes of whole public  :lol:

I have serious concerns that our war with guys from DRZ immediately becomes a  XP war, which is dull and unattractive. Do not get me wrong, but we're friends with them for years, and will be hard to find in a "fighting spirit"  and XP itself is not enough. Call me a hater, but I think that an excess of love does not help the game, and after so many years of knowledge, it is not easy, because most of us like almost everyone. Tragedy  :mrgreen:

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Farooq on December 16, 2013, 08:30:35 pm
stop writing so long textes  :mad:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 16, 2013, 08:32:06 pm
Concentration deficiency problem?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 16, 2013, 09:29:03 pm
Concentration deficiency problem?

Nope just tldr cause i got other things to do then complaining about things that already happened and wont be returned or made undone.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tindel on December 16, 2013, 09:32:47 pm
This same situation nearly happened a couple of months ago, the whole leadership was sick to death of everything and totally overworked/burned out.
A call to arms came out and everyone was asked to step up and help lead, a couple guys volunteered and the fight kept going.

But those guys fell as well, and in the end it was just the hard core left.
Its not like they havent tried and tried again, but when not enough people arent willing to help its just a matter of time.

Everyone understands the frustration and dissapointment from UIF, deprived of your enemy. And i think you are entitled to have those feelings, after all you put in all that work too.
Where your alliance grew stronger everyday, and got new blood and new members, ours just dwindled and dried up.


Harpag, you are probably too focused on the coalition leadership as your enemies and that is why you get the wrong ideas.
Take a deep breath and read what they have written. Its all there, it is not bullshit.
I know these guys, they call it as they see it.

Im not the first to say, but alliances will be the death of strategus.
Your best course of action is to destroy UIF and declare war on your biggest rival.

After all, there can be only one.






Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Casimir on December 16, 2013, 09:53:15 pm
If all the uif cared about was fighting battles for fun they would have gone to war with one another long ago.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 16, 2013, 11:08:52 pm
Problem with reading with comprehension, huh?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Butan on December 16, 2013, 11:28:56 pm
The boxer analogy was pretty good.


But you should use this analogy this way : friend boxer or enemy boxer, there is no difference, they both fight and enjoy the fight. Because the fight itself need no hate or love, it just need fighting spirit (like you said). The fighting spirit come more from the fight itself than the relationship the 2 boxers have. You dont need to hate each other to fight each other, find a gameplay reason for war, not a real life relationship reason  :wink:


Then, if there is no gameplay reason not to fight each other, I would understand but from where I stand, and seeing strategus history, its more complicated than that yes?

Even after months of strategus stalking, I still dont understand Hetman-Vovka (and other lieutenants) relationship   :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: NuberT on December 16, 2013, 11:32:59 pm
This same situation nearly happened a couple of months ago, the whole leadership was sick to death of everything and totally overworked/burned out.
A call to arms came out and everyone was asked to step up and help lead, a couple guys volunteered and the fight kept going.

But those guys fell as well, and in the end it was just the hard core left.
Its not like they havent tried and tried again, but when not enough people arent willing to help its just a matter of time.

Everyone understands the frustration and dissapointment from UIF, deprived of your enemy. And i think you are entitled to have those feelings, after all you put in all that work too.
Where your alliance grew stronger everyday, and got new blood and new members, ours just dwindled and dried up.


Harpag, you are probably too focused on the coalition leadership as your enemies and that is why you get the wrong ideas.
Take a deep breath and read what they have written. Its all there, it is not bullshit.
I know these guys, they call it as they see it.

Im not the first to say, but alliances will be the death of strategus.
Your best course of action is to destroy UIF and declare war on your biggest rival.

After all, there can be only one.








ye take me for example, once the Kaisers right hand^^ I became so bored of strat and the UIF (particularly after the mulitaccount banwave and the we quit QQ from the UIF), I played WTF 1 battle in 2013 for HRE.. :oops:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


EDIT: I played 46 battles in 2012 btw..
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Olwen on December 16, 2013, 11:46:47 pm
imo half of the grey order should join hre and the other half should join drz

like in ww2  :lol:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 17, 2013, 03:11:25 am
@HRE guys - I'm able understand many things, but not burning all stuff - still  :mad:
@Kinn - it was something between me and Beauchamp, believe me don't remember what it exactly was, but for sure bullshitt - just pretext
@Olwen - I have for you friendly advice - learn a few words in Turkish, eat some tasty kebabs, join Kapikulu, and then in a sneaky way become Sultan_Olwen_Lamhban_le_Faydit lord of of Reyvadin, and then give them all rank 0 + save. Then you'll be a hero again  :mrgreen:
@Erasmas - You're on thin ice - I can kill you IRL  :P
@Kesh - thanks for "-"  :rolleyes:

BTW - rondel patch  :shock:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Lt_Anders on December 17, 2013, 03:27:53 am
@HRE guys - I'm able understand many things, but not burning all stuff - still  :mad:
@Kinn - it was something between me and Beauchamp, believe me don't remember what it exactly was, but for sure bullshitt - just pretext
@Olwen - I have for you friendly advice - learn a few words in Turkish, eat some tasty kebabs, join Kapikulu, and then in a sneaky way become Sultan_Olwen_Lamhban_le_Faydit lord of of Reyvadin, and then give them all rank 0 + save. Then you'll be a hero again  :mrgreen:
@Erasmas - You're on thin ice - I can kill you IRL  :P
@Kesh - thanks for "-"  :rolleyes:

BTW - rondel patch  :shock:

Even Better. Good job whoring troops and not giving XP to anyone.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: tizzango on December 17, 2013, 04:49:15 am
I would love to give Strategus a go as simply the 'Fallen' faction. But as someone who has never sat down to learn the mechanics and devices of the Strategus map, it would be useless to even attempt to go up against DRZ/GO.

Fallen are really inactive, both in Strat and cRPG, contrary to popular belief. And even if I did give it a shot and helped in Fallen Strat leadership, and we had maybe 5 or 6 active Fallen members to play, there would be a few considerations on my mind;

- Who would we fight? We could fight anyone, without holding any previous grudges and start new wars (maybe even attack the HRShits :D), but for how long until we get curb stomped by the DRZ/GO consolidated wave.

- GO/DRZ would still consider us lead by Tomas and Rogue so we would be their first target, and again, we would get fucked almost instantly.

- I would be using this round to learn the game and fighting a huge alliance, who know exactly what they are doing, would be futile. Even if we had guidance from the likes of Nikodin, Tomas, Rogue (and whoever else called the shots for the COA), the advice and feedback would be delayed and we would already be at a huge disadvantage.

- Quite simply it would be; Noobs vs Veterans. We would get fucked so hard in weeks/days.

- I really wouldn't want two carebear block alliances fighting again, because that is just deja-vu and not fun. It would be more of "If we can avoid being a carebear alliance, so can the UIF" statement.

Regardless of all that, I would still like to give this Strat a shot but I just don't see the point if we're going to be facing UIF, again.

This is just my perspective on the matter, I haven't actually spoken to any of the Fallens about this (although I will).
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Torben on December 17, 2013, 09:41:51 am
I would love to give Strategus a go as simply the 'Fallen' faction. But as someone who has never sat down to learn the mechanics and devices of the Strategus map, it would be useless to even attempt to go up against DRZ/GO.

Fallen are really inactive, both in Strat and cRPG, contrary to popular belief. And even if I did give it a shot and helped in Fallen Strat leadership, and we had maybe 5 or 6 active Fallen members to play, there would be a few considerations on my mind;

- Who would we fight? We could fight anyone, without holding any previous grudges and start new wars (maybe even attack the HRShits :D), but for how long until we get curb stomped by the DRZ/GO consolidated wave.

- GO/DRZ would still consider us lead by Tomas and Rogue so we would be their first target, and again, we would get fucked almost instantly.

- I would be using this round to learn the game and fighting a huge alliance, who know exactly what they are doing, would be futile. Even if we had guidance from the likes of Nikodin, Tomas, Rogue (and whoever else called the shots for the COA), the advice and feedback would be delayed and we would already be at a huge disadvantage.

- Quite simply it would be; Noobs vs Veterans. We would get fucked so hard in weeks/days.

- I really wouldn't want two carebear block alliances fighting again, because that is just deja-vu and not fun. It would be more of "If we can avoid being a carebear alliance, so can the UIF" statement.

Regardless of all that, I would still like to give this Strat a shot but I just don't see the point if we're going to be facing UIF, again.

This is just my perspective on the matter, I haven't actually spoken to any of the Fallens about this (although I will).

Our great founder Beauchamp thought the Fallen as a pack of outcasts,  deserters and thugs,  roaming the steppes and plundering for a living,  not bound to domiciliary endeavors tying them down .  maybe this is the way the fallen should finally go...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 17, 2013, 10:22:21 am
(click to show/hide)

1 End of war between GO and Fallens / HRE 
2 I can join your faction for a moment and show you what's going on
3 Next time burn moar stuff morons
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Fips on December 17, 2013, 10:59:42 am
What EU strat needs is a complete diplomacy reset. No more UIF, no more coalition, no Northern Alliance and whatnot.

But we all know this is not going to happen, eh?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Kalp on December 17, 2013, 11:01:49 am
... DRZ/GO.

... DRZ/GO ...

... GO/DRZ ...

... UIF ...

... UIF ...
Export Druzhina to NA, problem solved  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: bavvoz on December 17, 2013, 11:09:45 am
A change in diplomacy can happen if ppl are willing to let go of the past. Who gives a shit about what happened years ago?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 17, 2013, 11:15:08 am
... Who gives a shit about what happened years ago?

Me. I don't give a shit what happened 3 years ago  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Olwen on December 17, 2013, 11:37:13 am
russians and turks are asians anyway, ban them from EU, freakin invaders



Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 17, 2013, 11:46:52 am

- GO/DRZ would still consider us lead by Tomas and Rogue so we would be their first target, and again, we would get fucked almost instantly.



I think Mercs would be the first target
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on December 17, 2013, 11:50:06 am
A change in diplomacy can happen if ppl are willing to let go of the past. Who gives a shit about what happened years ago?
it's not about "past" it's more who people are.  :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: bavvoz on December 17, 2013, 12:04:09 pm
it's not about "past" it's more who people are.  :P

Id say yes and no. Many ppl hold grudges over stuff that happened long ago which dosnt matter anymore. And ofc some ppl just dislike each other aswell.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 17, 2013, 12:24:35 pm
Bavvo - for sure you're fake Merc - you're too nice to be true Merc - don't try fool me  :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 17, 2013, 12:46:04 pm
Bavvo - for sure you're fake Merc - you're too nice to be true Merc - don't try fool me  :lol:

He is really a kalmarunion guy - also some guys in your clan Harpag have sworn loyalty to the Queen Margerete of Denmark, among them Hetman  :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 17, 2013, 12:51:58 pm
He is really a kalmarunion guy - also some guys in your clan Harpag have sworn loyalty to the Queen Margerete of Denmark, among them Hetman  :lol:

Do not touch our Scandinavians, or I'll cut your fingers  :mad:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 17, 2013, 12:56:35 pm
all this talk about touching each other  :oops:  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 17, 2013, 01:04:41 pm
(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Scandinavians are coming from all clans Harpag - brothers bound to each other - all will come and in the end all will join and pay loyalty to her majesty the Queen

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: bavvoz on December 17, 2013, 01:08:43 pm
Going waaaasy off topic here lol almost hmm how do u say it, swallowed the coffee wrong giving me a cough attack!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Zomg on December 17, 2013, 01:12:48 pm
I like how people are sucking one others cock, which shows that populated clans of this rounds Strat, will remain allies and friends for the next one. However that is understandable, as many stated, including those who I alleged sucking others cocks, it is more bound to previous relationships and shit, and I in no way despise that.

However you also need to understand Strat has a Roleplay core; where you are not who you are, but a persona you assume through the game. Which means, for the sake of entertainment and roleplay, one should be able to destroy his friend, and his friend should enjoy that for the very sake of entertainment and roleplay itself.

Though this is not a Roleplaying game, it should have one of its core values too. It is not about winning, but making sure all parties involved having as much fun as they can get. That wasn't the case for Coalition, and the Coalition just called that "we are done".  And unless people get mature enough to understand that concept, Strategus will keep being boring. Yes, the game is broken, but the players are broken as well.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 17, 2013, 01:42:13 pm
Ah i forgot something...

It seems like the Bros are the last Men standing against the UIF...everyone else started bowing infront of hetman. Weird...
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 17, 2013, 01:54:18 pm
Ah i forgot something...

It seems like the Bros are the last Men standing against the UIF...everyone else started bowing infront of hetman. Weird...

Has the UIF ever attacked u? Correct me if I am wrong, but arent you just grounded in your castle the last 6 months? Dont padd yourself on the back - u failed miserably Chris  :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 17, 2013, 02:20:27 pm
oh god...

bros are completely inactive.
Only one playing these days are xdead, heibai and sometimes austri. Nogo and me are playing other games or studying/working like austri.
I wouldnt say we failed...we just didnt do that much, but what we did was quite good. KD ratios of almost 2:1 in all wars we fought...
Also i know that hetman doesnt care about one castle on the map, but its still that the bros are the only ones that own a fief, that never made any deal with him or other UIF members.
And thats why I say, Bros are the last faction on the map that are standing against UIF & Co.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: GRANDMOM on December 17, 2013, 02:28:02 pm
oh god...

bros are completely inactive.
Only one playing these days are xdead, heibai and sometimes austri. Nogo and me are playing other games or studying/working like austri.
I wouldnt say we failed...we just didnt do that much, but what we did was quite good. KD ratios of almost 2:1 in all wars we fought...
Also i know that hetman doesnt care about one castle on the map, but its still that the bros are the only ones that own a fief, that never made any deal with him or other UIF members.
And thats why I say, Bros are the last faction on the map that are standing against UIF & Co.

NI_knights?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 17, 2013, 02:38:47 pm
Anyways, congratz Coallition, I can now safely say you killed Strat:

http://forum.melee.org/announcements/strategus-doublexp/ (http://forum.melee.org/announcements/strategus-doublexp/)

 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 17, 2013, 02:55:03 pm
Anyways, congratz Coallition, I can now safely say you killed Strat:

http://forum.melee.org/announcements/strategus-doublexp/ (http://forum.melee.org/announcements/strategus-doublexp/)

 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

This is exactly what they wanted :D

NI_knights?

NI is neutral to everyone ;D
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: tizzango on December 17, 2013, 04:26:14 pm
Our great founder Beauchamp thought the Fallen as a pack of outcasts,  deserters and thugs,  roaming the steppes and plundering for a living,  not bound to domiciliary endeavors tying them down .  maybe this is the way the fallen should finally go...

I joined Fallen because of this theme.

I had this idea of Fallen being wayward mercenaries, being paid to intercept trade runs or army movements. That would be pretty cool for roleplay for the Fallens.

I guess we could hold a vote on our forums to see how Fallen want to play next strat.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tyr_ on December 17, 2013, 05:33:52 pm
I had this idea of Fallen being wayward mercenaries, being paid to intercept trade runs or army movements.
That seat is already taken!  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Olwen on December 17, 2013, 06:17:15 pm
You lost that sit since a long time Tyr.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 17, 2013, 06:24:00 pm
You lost that sit since a long time Tyr.


Here comes the coward, its really a shame that you went bitching to the devs to remove your custom title, it suited you best.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 17, 2013, 06:27:31 pm

Here comes the coward, its really a shame that you went bitching to the devs to remove your custom title, it suited you best.
Says the guy who challenged someone that hadn't been playing for ages to a very high stakes duel, then pussied out, when the defendant chose weapons and terms, making lame excuses and resorting to name calling. Stay classy. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Tomas on December 17, 2013, 08:06:57 pm
This is exactly what they wanted :D

Actually no.

The last thing we want is a reset as we're in no state to play another round and it will probably be another 3-4 months before anybody has the time and energy to change that.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Jack1 on December 17, 2013, 08:24:19 pm
WAS THE COALITION ABOUT TO INVADE NA OR SOME SHIT?!?!?!!?

http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=6130
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Fips on December 17, 2013, 08:38:58 pm
WAS THE COALITION ABOUT TO INVADE NA OR SOME SHIT?!?!?!!?

http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=6130

Lol.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Mongolista on December 18, 2013, 01:54:52 am
Thanks Chris :D No we never made any pacts with UIF and yes we were always with Coalition, which, to be honest, did not help us that much, but was still standing behind our back, which is pretty much what we needed and we did good job as bordermen. But we have never backed down even when Coalition stopped playing and same as Fallens, we will most likely not play the next strat turn since we have too much stuff to do in real life and not enough energy for another round. We could probably find the time but none of us is really enjoying the game that much to put that effort into it.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Segd on December 18, 2013, 03:57:04 am
No we never made any pacts with UIF and yes we were always with Coalition
NAP with DRZ maybe? Wasn't you curious why nobody attacked you in ages?  :?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Vovka on December 18, 2013, 07:43:40 am
NAP with DRZ maybe? Wasn't you curious why nobody attacked you in ages?  :?
as always Ni's left hand didn't know what Ni's right hand already fap fap today  :P
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 18, 2013, 10:29:29 am
Actually no.

 :lol: :twisted: :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 10:37:18 am
Says the guy who challenged someone that hadn't been playing for ages to a very high stakes duel, then pussied out, when the defendant chose weapons and terms, making lame excuses and resorting to name calling. Stay classy. :rolleyes:


I told him that I didnt want any gold from  his part, I told him that I could use a STF character instead of my level 34 main, I told him that he could pick my melee class , I even told him that I would give him a week to train himself, but instead he chickened out, and he said to duel him in a Couch duel, which is totally based on luck, no skill or brain required just pure luck and timing.

I don`t know why most people  think that Olwen is good, he was always bad, he just had the luck to start from the start of the mod when the average melee skill was bad and crouch huscarl and plate armour.

I can take him anytime, with any conditions, anywhere, as long as our duel is based on true skill, not some random couch crap.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 10:40:51 am
Oh I forgot, I even told him, he could start with 3 wins in a first to 7 duel. Such a pussy he is that he even denied that.


When someone challenges you, you do it, even if you know that you are gonna lose, you just go with it.

In the past I had challenged Cyber, and had my ass kicked, he later challenged me, and even though I knew that I didnt had many chances of winning, I proceeded to duel him and lost 5-3, when someone challenges you, you duel him, you dont pussy out.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 18, 2013, 11:20:38 am
I joined Fallen because of this theme.

I had this idea of Fallen being wayward mercenaries, being paid to intercept trade runs or army movements. That would be pretty cool for roleplay for the Fallens.

I guess we could hold a vote on our forums to see how Fallen want to play next strat.

We already have that role Tizz :D, none of this East V West BS anymore, but feel free to compete with us, would be interesting,maybe a Merc v Fallen war, could be fun
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Olwen on December 18, 2013, 11:43:17 am
As I told you already, why don`t you roll with us??

We are currently 6 members in the Guard, since I dont like doing mass recruiting, but our numbers increase slow but steady

here have a look at our thread, http://forum.melee.org/faction-halls/tagma-tn-varangn/

our TS channel is on mercs TS, we`re there mostly at evenings!

Is it because I refused your several insistent invitations to join your clan that you have to act so much as a moron, mostly in unrelated threads and when nobody cares?  :rolleyes:

Anyway, la bave du crapaud n'atteint pas la blanche colombe.  :|
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 12:04:43 pm
Is it because I refused your several insistent invitations to join your clan that you have to act so much as a moron, mostly in unrelated threads and when nobody cares?  :rolleyes:

Anyway, la bave du crapaud n'atteint pas la blanche colombe.  :|

Yeah I asked you to join us one time, and thats because I though you were good or at least mediocre, later on when me and centurii kept humiliating you on EU3, realised how much you suck, and you cant even kill a naked peasant. But that didnt had anything to do with me challenging you, little white dove  :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 18, 2013, 12:06:50 pm
Yeah I asked you to join us one time, and thats because I though you were good or at least mediocre, later on when me and centurii kept humiliating you on EU3, realised how much you suck, and you cant even kill a naked peasant. But that didnt had anything to do with me challenging you, little white dove  :lol:

A naked peasant who knows how to block can be tough to kill sometimes, im sure i could bring muffin along in peasant gear and he would fuck you up.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 12:10:53 pm
A naked peasant who knows how to block can be tough to kill sometimes, im sure i could bring muffin along in peasant gear and he would fuck you up.

I doubt it.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Harpag on December 18, 2013, 12:20:07 pm
Panos & Olwen - you're both known due to e-peen to the knees lol, you can keep spicy details for yourself  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 02:18:29 pm

I told him that I didnt want any gold from  his part, I told him that I could use a STF character instead of my level 34 main, I told him that he could pick my melee class , I even told him that I would give him a week to train himself, but instead he chickened out, and he said to duel him in a Couch duel, which is totally based on luck, no skill or brain required just pure luck and timing.

I don`t know why most people  think that Olwen is good, he was always bad, he just had the luck to start from the start of the mod when the average melee skill was bad and crouch huscarl and plate armour.

I can take him anytime, with any conditions, anywhere, as long as our duel is based on true skill, not some random couch crap.
Says the guy who challenged someone that hadn't been playing for ages to a very high stakes duel, then pussied out, when the defendant chose weapons and terms, making lame excuses and resorting to name calling. Stay classy. :rolleyes:
Duel rules = defendant chooses weapons and terms.

Also, more than half of those excuses are completely false, the initial challenge had none of that.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 02:23:48 pm
Duel rules = defendant chooses weapons and terms.

Also, more than half of those excuses are completely false, the initial challenge had none of that.


Its cute how you try to defend your girlfriend, but may I suggest educating yourself regarding the rules of dueling please.

Stop making a fool out of yourself.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 02:27:14 pm
I challenge you to a longspear duel for 4 MW items, today, at 18:30 EET on NA3. If you refuse, you are major pussy. Sounds alright? I'm sure it does.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 18, 2013, 02:43:29 pm
I challenge you to a longspear duel for 4 MW items, today, at 18:30 EET on NA3. If you refuse, you are major pussy. Sounds alright? I'm sure it does.
i will do that, but give me 4 years to practice
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 02:46:11 pm
Ah, sorry, according to Panos-logic, that means you back out and thus give me the right to call you a pussy and a coward for all eternity. :lol:
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 03:01:38 pm
I challenge you to a longspear duel for 4 MW items, today, at 18:30 EET on NA3. If you refuse, you are major pussy. Sounds alright? I'm sure it does.

Ok Ill be there.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 18, 2013, 03:08:13 pm
Ah, sorry, according to Panos-logic, that means you back out and thus give me the right to call you a pussy and a coward for all eternity. :lol:

oh noes, im off to kill myself, i cant live with the shame

Ok Ill be there.

But you don't have 4 MW items
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Jacko on December 18, 2013, 03:16:21 pm
This is so silly.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: kinngrimm on December 18, 2013, 03:54:30 pm
This is so silly.
sure, but whoever wins, the whinning afterwards
maybe also because of NA could be priceless  :lol:

a herald is visiting all towns anouncing the
DUEL OF THE GIANTS

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: tizzango on December 18, 2013, 04:06:37 pm
We already have that role Tizz :D, none of this East V West BS anymore, but feel free to compete with us, would be interesting,maybe a Merc v Fallen war, could be fun

'War' would imply that each side are providing a fair contest to one another. What you meant to say was Fallen vs Merc massacre*, because the victors write history; and that's how we'll write it!

HOHOHO MERRY CHRISTMAS, FAIR JOUST TO ONES PERSON :D!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 04:41:55 pm
Ok Ill be there.
H'okay then :lol:

Best of 5.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 04:55:20 pm
H'okay then :lol:

Best of 5.

lol make it later though because Im in a 3 hour strategus xp battle!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 04:56:07 pm
Oh, oh, excuses again!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Strudog on December 18, 2013, 04:56:27 pm
'War' would imply that each side are providing a fair contest to one another. What you meant to say was Fallen vs Merc massacre*, because the victors write history; and that's how we'll write it!

HOHOHO MERRY CHRISTMAS, FAIR JOUST TO ONES PERSON :D!

We will see, Mercs are pro, have you not seen our TS address?
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 05:40:48 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

SO RONERY
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 18, 2013, 06:20:57 pm
lol make it later though because Im in a 3 hour strategus xp battle!
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: [ptx] on December 18, 2013, 06:32:04 pm
Lol, no.

According to your own "logic", you are now a coward. Congrats.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on December 18, 2013, 06:32:37 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

SO RONERY

Panos the cowardly pussy!

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Cyber on December 19, 2013, 08:19:04 am
Oh I forgot, I even told him, he could start with 3 wins in a first to 7 duel. Such a pussy he is that he even denied that.


When someone challenges you, you do it, even if you know that you are gonna lose, you just go with it.

In the past I had challenged Cyber, and had my ass kicked, he later challenged me, and even though I knew that I didnt had many chances of winning, I proceeded to duel him and lost 5-3, when someone challenges you, you duel him, you dont pussy out.

Just to be clear, it was 5-2 and I didn't issue the challenge, you challenged me after promising to humiliate me like some other wannabe hero that you supposedly beaten, you said it should take you a week to be ready to duel me but you got around to it half a year later so don't feel too bad if you have to wait a bit PTX.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Panos_ on December 19, 2013, 08:32:55 am
Just to be clear, it was 5-2 and I didn't issue the challenge, you challenged me after promising to humiliate me like some other wannabe hero that you supposedly beaten, you said it should take you a week to be ready to duel me but you got around to it half a year later so don't feel too bad if you have to wait a bit PTX.


It was 5-3, but whatever I`m not gonna argue with you on that, if you want to count 2 , be my guest its not gonna make a difference on me.

And you had to wait half a year, because I got banned  :lol:, also no need to be such an obnoxious little prick bro, you aint nothing special, relax.


Also, not that it matters anymore because I lost, but since you like bringing in more details ill do you the favour, I duelled you with a level 32 polearmer fully unloomed, while you on the other hand had a level 35 fully loomed 1hander, with maxed out IF and body armour, I needed 5 and in some cases 6 hits with a long bardiche to kill you while you needed 2. As I said, nothing special.


Also don`t forget to mention that you said, that if you were playing with your alt, you`d probably lose.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Cyber on December 19, 2013, 09:01:03 am

It was 5-3, but whatever I`m not gonna argue with you on that, if you want to count 2 , be my guest its not gonna make a difference on me.

And you had to wait half a year, because I got banned  :lol:, also no need to be such an obnoxious little prick bro, you aint nothing special, relax.


Also, not that it matters anymore because I lost, but since you like bringing in more details ill do you the favour, I duelled you with a level 32 polearmer fully unloomed, while you on the other hand had a level 35 fully loomed 1hander, with maxed out IF and body armour, I needed 5 and in some cases 6 hits with a long bardiche to kill you while you needed 2. As I said, nothing special.


Also don`t forget to mention that you said, that if you were playing with your alt, you`d probably lose.

Yay, time for another forum e-peen duel.  :D

I have no idea where the hell did you take that I had a level 35 fully loomed 1hander, I never got above 32 in my life  :lol: I was level 30 at the time, same as now.

Obviously, you saying that you needed 5-6 hits to kill me (5 IF 18/18 build) and me needing 2 is bullshit, if anything it was more towards the opposite but ofc you will find a excuse, first time it was 5-0 and then it was me spamming too much. Also I remember it perfectly being 5-2 but it really doesn't matter, I just find it amusing that you are willing to blatantly lie for one extra duel in a meaningless first to 5. But let's leave it at that, It's I said you said.

I have offered you to duel me in native several times but ofc you refused because you know we would be on even ground and you wouldn't be able to bring up any excuses. (well it could probably be ping or low fps) If you ever want to do it though so I wouldn't have my 2 level disadvantage helping me I'm more then happy to.

Only reason I even brought this up is because of you being a "obnoxious little prick bro" to others, challenging a guy who hasn't played actively for over a year now and being proud of being able to beat him, I duelled Olwen quite a bit back when he was still active and even now your not at the same skill level as he was back then.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: no_rules_just_play on December 19, 2013, 09:12:21 am
how did the Ode vs Greys battle end? My girlfriend came by and I had to quit in the first minutes of the game when they were still refusing to open the fucking gates.

Hetman, that was fucking gay.
please don't do this again, enjoy your last week(s). XP battles won't make you lose your 'precious' fiefs anyway.
Title: Re: Coalition-Druzhina battle agreement aka Gentelmens War
Post by: Erasmas on December 19, 2013, 02:24:45 pm
It was boooooring... There is not enough grinder in me to go to such boring stuff again.