Apart from the obvious fallacies in your post
Oh yeah, I forgot to address your little conspiracy theory:
Really, man? :lol:
(click to show/hide)
Bjord is really coming off as a fascist, and I don't like it. There is a thin line between having a supporting community and having a community that must be nice to each other all the fucking time. I don't want any part of the latter.
The question is - will you be missed?
asks ppl not to judgeWHAT?
judges ppl
a+b=/c
it equals
F, which is what your transcript will read
If you would like to continue playing, you must complete an unban essay consisting of "500 words that aren't offensive." We're not convinced you can do that without being sarcastic or accusatory.
I don't think I ever saw so many advocates of the devil in one thread before.
It's fucking simple, old player calling new players "bundle of sticks", "retard" and "sperg" will most likely lead to him not coming back. I can't blame them either, who wants to be in a community with self-obsessed megalomaniacs?
Such people need to be removed, just like you remove the cancerous part before it spreads to the rest of the body. Bad atmosphere is what kills games and communities, not shitty patches.
Furthermore, is there anyone who wants to go to a place they've never been to before and without warning be greeted by a barrage of insults, offensive language and complete disrespect?
As a full-blooded and extremely proud American, with relatives and ancestors who died spilling blood and having their blood spilled during wartime to protect the freedom and sovereignty of this country, I can tell you the most important thing American citizens have is our freedom of speech. It’s arguably the biggest reason we’re easily the greatest country on the planet. However, over the years I’ve seen a new beast rear its ugly head operating under the guise of social justice and threatening the fabric of this most precious right. The beast itself is called political correctness. Based off a noble principle, it serves as an indirect and invisible blanket of intimidation meant to stifle and suppress any though that is not aligned within what is deemed socially acceptable by mainstream society. It’s the most insidious form of widespread censorship and social engineering in post-modern society, and its impact is sadly felt on a daily basis.
Do you shout profanities at people in real life because you're frustrated with them as well? Does that get you any where in life, in general? I seriously doubt it does. An online gaming community is no different.
he is playing on a private server with a specific code of conduct he is violating
You broke this rule, there is no arguing that. Your only logical options are to argue the validity of the rule (seems like a good rule to me that exists in basically every game out there) or to realize you made a mistake and apologize.
old player calling new players "bundle of sticks", "retard" and "sperg" will most likely lead to him not coming back.
"Please" works fine for me when I lead the pubbies.Likewise.
As a full-blooded and extremely proud American, with relatives and ancestors who died spilling blood and having their blood spilled during wartime to protect the freedom and sovereignty of this country, I can tell you the most important thing American citizens have is our freedom of speech.
Lemmywinks, I think you glazed over the validity of this rule rather quickly. Again a major point here is that this rule is entirely subjective. Is everyone who uses "racism, insulting, griefing" banned? Of course not. How is this decided? Well it seems to be decided however the admins feel like deciding it. This sort of broad ability to ban anyone who talks any sort of trash in game is really scary and a bad power to give the authority. Either specify which language is appropriate or stop childishly banning for language that displeases you.
The fact that Canary gave you essentially one guideline to follow for your essay and you couldn't even follow that shows a lot about your character.
Its up to the admins to decide, and this is what they have decided, so that's the way it is.
I don't think I've ever seen the crpg admin community more succinctly and accurately described. This is depressing.
An idiot.
To answer a question with a question, do you remember that thread where he staged his own death in a pathetic attempt to seek attention?Actually Allers made that thread, spook just played along.
Its up to the admins to decide, and this is what they have decided, so that's the way it is.
"Please" works fine for me when I lead the pubbies.
One more post and then I'm out of this thread. Folks are going nuts over this shit. It's obvious that he isn't getting unbanned. Not one admin is in his defense...and I'd be willing to bet not more than two of them are even neutral. When it's that much of a majority, the case is closed. No hung juries here.
Anyway, just want to back Dexxtaa up. This guy is one of the only folks to try and call out commands to the team. They are always intelligent, and Dexx is a fantastic person and always cordial+polite. And sometimes, people even listen to him. Only other people that I see regularly attempt to lead teams are Robert Namo (who I think is playing GW2 or something, so he barely counts) and myself (who also barely counts, because in comparison to many players and indeed many people in this thread, I'm not only new but also quite bad at the game).
Closing statement. I urge, plead, kindly beg all of you to refuse to take a stance of "it is the admins decision, they are there for a reason, their word is law, etc" That's a fucking dangerous thing to say. That last sentence was dramatization and hyperbole, sure. But people, have your OWN opinions on things. State those opinions in a lucid, well thought-out manner. Do not be rude to others for their opinions. I have much more respect for those that stated something like "Spook is a fucking douche, he broke a bunch of rules, he scares away new players, he needs to stay banned" than those who stated "the admins make the calls, deal w/ it" Even if I strongly disagree with people stating that spook needs to stay banned and the community has no place for people that are rude, I commend them for coming out and saying it.
Oh, and by the way, if I had my way, there would be absolutely no disciplinary action taken for anything other than griefing, teamkilling, and cheating. This game has one of the most simple and intuitive mute functions I have ever seen. If this was Red Orchestra 2 or something, it would be different. People should be pro-active and take measures to protect their sentiments and feelings; not be protected by someone else.
Thank you for your time; you're all beautiful.
Anywho, I'm mainly just posting here to say "Keep Spook banned" and to farm very easy +/- points since there are a few dedicated -1ers here who are more then happy to oblige me.
Ciao Spook, see ya never(unless you buy a new key).and see that key get banned most likely.
Ciao Spook, see ya never(unless you buy a new key).
I read it all, had some laughs and really hope for OP's mortal soul that he is just trolling. One point of those essays is for us to see if the subject understood why he was banned. With that we can permaban without remorse at the next similar offense because then we are sure he knew what he was doing.
Writing a "I knew what I was doing and I will do it again" essay saves us that trouble though, thanks. Gut your fish elsewhere.
Your post positively shot off on a tangent. Are you planning to bring it to a head, or leave us hanging with bated breath.
significant megalomania, lack of empathy, ad hominems, victim blaming, deriding a "progressive movement" in america to stop people saying friend and bundle of sticks as ignorant, proudly talking about freedom of speech and business master's yet not realizing he is playing on a private server with a specific code of conduct he is violating, making the argument that going to a burger king and yelling MAKE A DELICIOUS MOTHERFUCKING WHOPPER YOU LAZY friend bundle of sticks to get better than expected lunch would be patriotic, undertones of legitimate misogyny, homophobia, and racism in every sentence
a+ would unban for entertaining essay, but as a mission statement on the life and times of spookisland and a personal philosophy it is hilariously awful
No abuse of in-game chat (racism, insulting, griefing...)
I believe this is the rule you've been accused of breaking.
Like it or not there are people who are genuinely full of hate who play this game. I'm not one of them.
Are you seriously unable to draw a connection from what I originally posted in this topic and the events that unfolded yesterday?
Or are you just playing dumb?
Also, I've never seen you lead a pub game in my entire time playing this game in 2.5 years and 35 generations so don't try saying "please works just fine for me."
By my own personal experience, I think you're completely and utterly full of shit saying that.
If I had actually seen you lead at least once, I'd probably feel differently. However, that is not the case.
First time visiting this post since making it, not really surprised by how many trolls showed up to try to keep me banned. Bjord is a perfect example. The kid literally was the first person in here with multiple posts trying to undermine the truth of what I said.
Like I said, I eat trolls for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Bjord was just another nameless troll who got spanked in game then went crying to the forum to try and save some shred of the dignity he lost.
Literally no idea who he even is. Don't worry, I get that a lot. People I don't even recognize trying to start garbage with me because they are carrying some grudge. I'm nothing more than a target of their anger that stems from conflict in their own personal lives.
Like it or not there are people who are genuinely full of hate who play this game. I'm not one of them. Do you see me taking my harassment to the forum? No.
Look at the same example I gave you, Bjord, and it's a totally different story.
Like it or not, I don't hate anybody in this game or community. I like plenty of people who play here and a lot of people like me. Maybe that eats some of you up. That doesn't really concern me.
How many insults do you think occur in your average game of CRPG?
How many people do you see getting reprimanded or banned everyday for insulting?
Do you really expect people to respect a rule that only gets enforced when the admins simply feel like it? Even when such admins themselves have knowingly broken such rules?
Honestly, I really want to know.
But try applying that same mentality to real-life and ask yourself if you'd feel the same if people committing fraud, theft, etc.. were only punished at all whenever Judges felt like it.
Something tells me a free society wouldn't last very long with stipulations such as that.
... Frankly, I'm not entirely sure why I should be forced to apologize for talking trash while other players are allowed to get away with it even though they may be conducting it on a more minor scale.
... Am I supposed to be held to some higher standard than every other player; despite not being an administrator or holding any formal title other than player? Honestly.
Frankly, I'm not entirely sure why I should be forced to apologize for talking trash while other players are allowed to get away with it even though they may be conducting it on a more minor scale.You let your dog take a crap in public on a business property, you get your wrist slapped and possibly a fine or a warning.
I read it all, had some laughs and really hope for OP's mortal soul that he is just trolling. One point of those essays is for us to see if the subject understood why he was banned. With that we can permaban without remorse at the next similar offense because then we are sure he knew what he was doing.
Writing a "I knew what I was doing and I will do it again" essay saves us that trouble though, thanks. Gut your fish elsewhere.
1. I'm essentially forced to issue an apology to the community; even though nobody from the community (that I know of) put forward a ban request on me with evidence to back it up. This was purely a homework project by the admins themselves digging up log information in their spare time.
2. After my apology, I have a big target on my back for every player with a petty grudge to try and start shit with me attempting to goad me into asserting my dominance toward them. They break the subjective guidelines in an attempt to get me to do the same. Then they report me, get away with it, and I'm punished severely because the Admins hold my record above my head despite not starting the confrontation.
If the admins make trash talking and insult hurling 100% illegal, I'll be happy to follow those rules. I can adapt to that easily. Right now, that is not the case. There's a huge grey area purposefully built into the rules as they stand.
So why should I be held accountable and unprivileged to such behavior while others are allowed to continue doing the same thing at their leisure with no repercussion?
That's what I don't understand.
Considering that nobody came forward anytime recently with ban requests bolstering such claims with strictly shown evidence, I do not believe anyone is genuinely hurt by anything I've said.
If I had intended to hurt you with anything I've said, and you were genuinely damaged by it emotionally, I would feel differently. I'm not a monster or a strict sociopath.
...
If someone can convince me otherwise and that I was genuinely destroying the community or whatever, I'm all ears.
You've done it to the point where it isn't just trashtalking, it's a willful attempt to alienate entire servers of people. The rules have gray areas because we're still discovering and establishing the boundaries for them, it is an ongoing process. You, actually, are helping.
Canary even said that Spook is helping!
Free Spook! Praise him!(click to show/hide)
Which is how I have come to lead a successful clan by my criteria.
That not being the point, I have led teams. The difference being that you tended to be screaming over me, so I left you to your own devices with your freaking out at your/my team. I only took the time to address you directly when people began complaining of your frequent and abusive conduct.
I lead the team in conjunction with my clan. Unlike you, I do not scream profanities at my team in a vain effort to control their battlefield movements. You seem to link abuse and leadership together, which I can assure you is not the case, under any circumstances.
I can tell you that I make it a point not to lead a battle when you are on my team because it is frankly tiring to have to bash heads with you.
Your personal experience with me is extremely limited simply because I have chosen not to consort with you. I do not believe that you are the "leader" that you make yourself out to be simply because people do not listen to you. Perhaps you get a better response on the siege server.
Also if you want to reference people being "full of shit," make sure you read page 1, post #1.
It really boils down to this question.
You have a tumor inside your brain that is going to kill you.
The surgery itself is extremely dangerous.
Do you pick the nice guy brain surgeon who isn't very good at his job?
Or do you pick the asshole, who is the best at what he does, and is going to get the job done even if he has to fray some nerves?
Is this the part where I point out that at least in America, doctors can be fired for the same behavior you exhibit? I should also point out that the rigorous trainings and standards, reviews and such means there are no practicing "brain surgeons" or any surgeon operating in America who is "not very good at his job."
I would be forced to choose the doctor who still has his license.
It boils down to you exhibiting behavior not condoned in a private establishment, and said private establishment throwing you out. What Canary said about the "Freedom of Speech and Disturbing the peace" still applies here. Society has never been very tolerant of anti-social behavior.
And you would die because you put your pride over reason and basic rationale. That pretty much tells me and everybody else all they need to know.
There's plenty of people who display anti-social behavior. Some are even admins.
You can't make a black and white argument with a grey area rulebook.
You can't make a black and white argument with a grey area rulebook.Agreed, so stop making black and white comparisons.
No, I would possibly die because I'm forced by Federal law to choose the "nice guy" who is still allowed in the hospital over the "asshole" who is without an operating table. Though in real life, I would actually bother doing research and choose someone who is competent at their job AND has their job still due to not being fired (Because again, in real life a doctor WILL be fired in America if said doctor speaks to patients as you do to your team. period).
Your comparisons to real life are terrible.
For someone who prides himself at critical thinking your RL comparisons are completely unrealistic and borderline tangent.
Again, "freedom of speech" does not allow oneself to be a public disturbance as that is "disturbing the peace" or "being a public nuisance."
Agreed, so stop making black and white comparisons.
Oh, and by the way, I'm not sure if you're an admin or whatever, but I do know somebody with a formal title higher than that of a regular player probably shouldn't be representing themselves that way.What in the world are you referencing here about "formal title?" :| :? :?:
What in the world are you referencing here about "formal title?" :| :? :?:
He probably means your King title, melord.
- A majority of replies in this thread have been negative towards you, as opposed to a handful of those in favor of you, most of whom seem to be doing it out of trolly principle.I don't think this is true. I, personally, just think spook is funny and cool to play with. I also think his ban is based on rather weak grounds. I'd say the majority of supporters believe one or both of these things.
- Every post you make about freedom and 'eating trolls' and insane babble only digs yourself deeperThis is unfortunately true - spook you made some good points in your op which focused on the nature of your ban and whether one is responsible for those they offend with in-game chat, but with every post you're seeming to move away from this reasonable ground into less feasible (although hilarious) arguments.
maybe if they can make it so spook is muted by default, and then if you actually want to hear his shit you would have to unmute him, and a warning would pop up saying "are you SURE you want to be called a bundle of sticks repeatedly?" and then if you are sure you hit yes and then you can enjoy having spook call you a bundle of sticks. maybe have it auto mute him again after every map and so every map you have to decide if you want to subject yourself to his bullshit.
GG spoopfans
I don't think this is true. I, personally, just think spook is funny and cool to play with. I also think his ban is based on rather weak grounds. I'd say the majority of supporters believe one or both of these things.
23/31 vote where thumbs down, 8/31 where thumbs up. Fractions. Spooks fans are just a loud vocal minority as 5/8 of you at least have commented in this thread while relatively few of the ones who thumbs downed him have. This aside from him probably having been vote kicked more than anyone in crpg history, i don't thin most players like him or his behavior, and the votes suggest his ban is justified in the eyes of the community.
Is this a reason to exile them from the game? I don't think so.
And spook getting kicked all the time is just what I'm talking about - It's hilarious. Can you honestly say that you didn't have at least a little enjoyment out of the process where spook joins, does some trolly shit, and the community lolkicks him? Spook's great for laughs - its just his own kind of laughs.
Hey if you don't ban him at least allow us to kick him when ever he's being a dick. Then he can still play and we the community can decide when enough is enough.
Vote mute. Vote kick and vote ban just gets abused to hell and back because of immature players. See replies in this thread. Essentially Spook was trying to have a good time and got carried away. It's easy to do in such a hostile environment really. Especially one where everyone thinks they're somehow better than you.
If someone does something once, yes, vote mute seems appropriate.
If someone does something twice, yes, vote mute seems appropriate.
If someone does something three times, yes, vote mute seems appropriate.
If someone does something four times, yes, vote mute seems appropriate.
If someone does something five times, yes, vote mute seems appropriate.
Spook pretty much deserved to be muted ever day he's ever played the game if you wanted to get technical about it. There comes a point where vote mute just doesn't cut it, and IMO that was months ago.
What you're pursuing isn't a solution to a problem. If the mute was sufficient once, it will always be sufficient. You seek to punish the individual causing the problem in hopes that it will not continue to be a problem in the future. That's the difference between our approaches. I think mine is more direct and addresses the concern. Yours requires oversight and tries to change behavior through shame and public humiliation. Besides, how often has punishing an individual really resulted in a significant change in behavior?
Bans and kicks should be reserved for actual disruptions of play. Mutes should address chat concerns since they don't actually hinder play beyond, perhaps, the ability to communicate with your team. I've rarely, if ever, seen instances of people trying to coordinate a team in chat instead of TS and the few times I have, I've never seen chat abuse interfere with that. So really, it's not an issue.
If language is an issue, a word filter ought to be devised. If a wordfilter is technically implausible due to the game design, the mod creators ought to revise their stance on what language is appropriate as the original game developers did not feel it was necessary to include such provisions and the intended audience should be mature enough to deal with it.
So your solution is to continue to do the same thing they have been doing for years that hasn't worked at all? (Amatsuka you should run for president.). If we ban him he will no longer be capable of breaking the rules, because he wont be around. Sounds like problem solved to me. He had the opportunity to change, either you do and you stay, or you don't and your gone, he chose the later.
What you're pursuing isn't a solution to a problem. If the mute was sufficient once, it will always be sufficient. You seek to punish the individual causing the problem in hopes that it will not continue to be a problem in the future. That's the difference between our approaches.Well your approach seems to be contrary to what admins do in general. People that get banned repeatedly for doing the same thing begin to face higher punishments, this is documented in countless ban threads. If someone TKs once and gets caught they might face 24 hours or maybe just a warning. If someone TKs again and again, their ban goes up (as it should).
Where is the poll?This
Where is the poll?
Wait, so I'm the only person who rated a 5?
You must admit, that long post deserve better than a 1.
if i wrote a 10 page essay entirely dedicated to shit talking you, would you give me better than a 1? even if it was just blatantly bad?
I thought Matey and Shine were cool. Turns out they are just a couple of gotten-to crybabies.
As far as unban essays for a shit mod of an indie Turkish game that nobody has ever heard of go, this is actually probably the best one ever written. You might disagree with the content or dislike the author, but the prose here is simply of a higher quality than the vast majority. 5/5
GG spookfans, Kaoklai out
I would say the essay itself is well penned if it wasn't so heavily biased. So I won't.
I thought Matey and Shine were cool. Turns out they are just a couple of gotten-to crybabies.
Are you breaking up with me Kaoklai? I thought we had something :(
Nah Spook's never done anything to me directly, but act or no act I'm not a fan of assholes. He's pushed the line too long and too often and I think the mod will be better without him.
Get ready.
I'm about to rip the lid off this son of a bitch.
Get ready.Don't die in the process.
I'm about to rip the lid off this son of a bitch.
; showering the night air with the sparkling image of an American Bald-Eagle giving the middle finger to Vladimir Putin*I have changed my mind. Unban this patriot!
1-A. I asked you to look at the logs (even gave you a specific time frame on when it happened) in the ban request thread involving a guy who was flagrantly TK'ing me, not to scour nearly a weeks worth of logs, completely unrelated to the actual case, for every shred of evidence you could possibly use against me. You know that. So don't try to act otherwise. I’m not impressed.
1-B. Yet you still chose to do so; through the better part of a week's worth of logs, days apart from the actual incident.
That's not a fluke. That is not a coincidence. Somebody apparently wanted to go through those logs pretty badly. You can't really say you don't want to do something when you do it anyway, in your spare time (as you put it), without any reasonable explanation.
Saying "we looked through the better part of a week's logs because you asked us to check up on this particular incident doesn't hold up to objective scrutiny. Saying one thing and doing another doesn't exactly give you a whole lot of credibility on this issue.
2. Implying that the community would be allowed to harass me to their hearts content while leaving me unable to respond in kind is a blatant double standard. The kinds of which I have been pointing out in the admins own behavior for a while now.
3. This is a strawman argument. You are directly accusing me of "willfully" and intentionally trying to alienate entire servers. This is entirely false.
Furthermore, the server has gray areas because you haven't boiled things down to the point where they would eliminate behaviors of obvious double-standards. This mod has been around 3+ years. It isn't really an "ongoing process" if no work is actually being done on it. Sadly, it takes a situation like this to make you realize/admit these gray areas lead to nothing but double-standards in rulings and abuse at the discretion of the personal feelings of the moderator staff. That is the nature of corruption at the very core of its concept.
I'm glad you're at least semi-acknowledging this in your post.
We’ve gone from:
http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-%28official%29/unban-spookpalace-38515/msg595222/#msg595222
"The server guidelines for behavior contain several grey areas that require human judgment and common sense. We won't be making them black and white and robo-responses simply because Spook has made a spectacle of himself."
To:
Canary: “The rules have gray areas because we're still discovering and establishing the boundaries for them, it is an ongoing process. You, actually, are helping.”
Not sure if you actually legitimately mean what you’re saying here. Not sure if you're actually going to do anything about it or just leave things as they are to make things more convenient for yourselves. But it is an improvement over what another admin previously said (to give credit where it is possibly due).
However, two months from now, if we see nothing has been done to narrow down the rules despite this whole “spectacle,” we will ABSOLUTELY know if you are flat-out lying to everyone right now or not.
4. Here’s the part of Canary’s post that gets really interesting.
Canary, here, literally uses the arguments of people who have been put up on the ban request forum, by me personally, for intentionally TW/TK’ing me after throwing a tantrum. These same people were guilty of the same infraction of rules (trash talking) that they accused me of and that you’re basing the meat of your argument off of. The difference is that I didn’t throw a tantrum and TK/TW anybody.
Canary, if you’re going to use the excuses (not even actual arguments) of guilty hypocrites, who are about to be hanged in their own ban threads for intentional tk’ing, I’d say your position and argument is in some serious fucking trouble.
Also, it is kind of convenient that you willfully chose not to actually link where the arguments were coming from, like you did initially, so people couldn’t put two and two together.
5. You can believe in expression of freedom and still care about someone’s feeling. Believing in the freedom to express yourself doesn’t mean you are an outright sociopath if that is what you’re attempting to imply.
6. This section is great because it is one fallacy followed by another (the second in the form of another strawman argument). First off, trash talk doesn’t give you the right to TK somebody. Repeated trash talk doesn’t give you the right to TK somebody. Do I ever TK anyone intentionally for trash talking me? No. Do I ever TK anyone intentionally for repeatedly trash talking me? No; hence, the painfully obvious logical fallacy here.
As for the strawman argument?
“You are a negative impact on this community and you've made it clear that you intend to continue to be so.”
I am also a positive impact on this community. However, I’m pretty sure I made it abundantly clear that I want the rules to be reformed to eliminate subjective rulebook abuse by the admins and to keep them from being protected by their obvious mistakes and practices of double standards. I’m pretty sure I’ve mentioned that I would be happy to turn in any trash talkers if you made it completely illegal. I am eager to form a solution. That doesn’t translate to what you’re trying to insinuate. The impression that I’m getting is that you don’t want to tackle this subject. If that is the case, why are you an admin? Do you not want to make the rules fairer for EVERYONE? Do you not want to eliminate possible abuse by your fellow admins and yourself? Do you not want to eliminate the corruption that goes on?
What is really curious in this segment is that you said I “push the limits” and not “break the limits.” That appears to me to be a Freudian slip. Seems to me it runs contrary to everything you’re trying to specifically state and prove; not exactly a great way to build an argument.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/strawman.html
7. This last final list is so laughably desperate I can’t even believe you’re trying it. However, if you want me to specifically address each one of these bullet points, it’s just going to continue to prove how laughably absurd your entire argument has become when actually challenged.
Hell, let’s give an example on the first one just for fun:
- “Fighting or challenging someone to fight in a public place”
The ENTIRE point of CRPG is to fight (either to kill or to claim an objective). Did you honestly even think before putting this list together? Honestly? You are definitely not helping your case with this type of nonsense.
Canary, I’m not intentionally trying to embarrass you here, but if this is the best you’re going to scrape together against me, you really have nobody to blame but yourself.
I can tell your heart isn’t in this argument. Frankly, I think everybody knows I’ve basically wrapped up the win for philosophical debate here (especially if this is the best initial response you can bring against me). It just really depends on if the admins will listen to reason or just abuse their positions of power to get their way and re-secure their own pride. They’d be proving my entire point by doing so.
We all know the unban essay forum is nothing more than a venue to publically humiliate someone.
You’d be perfectly happy eating a lie from me that you know is a lie just so you could feel a little bit bigger about yourselves; various individuals in the community included.
You aren’t dealing with a kid here. I have your job in the real world. I’m highly trained for it. I have years of experience in it. Frankly, I could do your job better than you. Put me to the test if you don’t believe me.
I’m not going to write some bullshit essay degrading myself, my family, where I come from, my values, etc.. like I’ve seen others do just so you can feel a little bit bigger and just so the community can feel like they are getting their satisfaction. If you have a hole in your self esteem, I suggest you go exercise and lift weights. If you have a grudge and want to have it out with me, I suggest you save it for playing against me in the game. Don’t abuse your position. Don’t abuse the system. If you want to solve this issue, I’d be more than happy to work with you, but I’m not going to shit on myself to make you feel better about whom you are.
Respect has to be earned, and you certainly aren’t earning it with anybody who can think for themselves and can see what you mods are doing; which dozens of people here can already.
If you want use the poll method of deciding what essay is good or not, we should use that method for deciding who stays as admin. Only we set the standard a little higher considering that with their power, they should be held to a higher standard. Then we make the poll system completely open to everyone so we can all see who votes. Then we filter the voting system so that no admin can vote for another admin and that no clan member can vote for another clan member or for someone in an allied clan. We remove the penchant for corruption that is already there.
If we played by those rules, how many of you admins would be thrown out on your ass? Definitely a vast number of you.
So if you want to live by the sword of lynchmob polling, you better be prepared and willing to die by it. However, I think that is the last thing the current admins genuinely want. You do not want to be held accountable, but you want to be freely entitled to hold everyone else accountable by subjective criteria you write yourselves. That’s called hypocrisy and corruption. I used to live in Illinois, and we know all about that game.
Finally, the cherry on top of this post.
I present everyone in the community and in this topic with yet another example of the exercise in routine double standards; only this time it was performed even with a clear black and white rule that allowed for no subjectivity.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Some petty, small-minded admin rewarded me last week with a 50% warning because I broke the double-posting rules in my own unban thread.
Notice the cutesy little immature message left to me that embodies the “well… so there!” attitude that runs amok when you let non-trained children enter a position of power usually because their other friends invite them aboard. Now notice that the first two replies in this topic, we’re currently in, broke literally the same rule and has no warning level. There were multiple people in this thread who broke that same black and white rule, yet I was the only one punished by it.
So I just want to thank that particular admin, who probably doesn’t have the balls to step forward and defend himself, for proving me exactly right yet again.
I literally could not have asked for a better example handed to me.
Thank you.
My final question in this reply to admins is this:
If you can’t even avoid blatant double standards and abuse, with clearly-written black and white rules such as brought up above, why should the community allow you vaguer, more subjective rules to employ your abuse with? Why should we give you the leverage and insurance to be as corrupt as you want to be when clearly you haven’t even gotten a handle on the most simplistic of rules that you created?
If there’s a problem with CRPG, it doesn’t lie within the community. I think I just proved that pretty clearly.
“Spook, out.”
Get ready.
I'm about to rip the lid off this son of a bitch.