Author Topic: NA Siege rule discussion  (Read 5516 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Muki

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 455
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • 偽善正義
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Exile
  • Game nicks: Muki
  • IRC nick: Muki, Muki39
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2012, 02:37:50 am »
+2
Abusing the pike by attacking through a solid door.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)


something like this attacking through doors?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

As a volunteer admin I clearly have no life and live only to eradicate all fun and enjoyment from the game. Your tears of rage are all the payment I need.
Yes I drew most of my avatars

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2012, 02:41:01 am »
0
I think he means through the OTHER doors. The ones with the holes in them that people poke and shoot through.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Meow

  • Awesome Consulting Detective
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 150
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2012, 02:42:52 am »
0
And on a side note no wonder why the siege server is dying and less and less peoples are playing on it. With admin like her, enforcing stuff that everyone been doing for years just to get some attention. Unless this become an official and clear rule on the list, my team wont stop from doing it.

You realize this mainly sounds like you are butthurt and want that admin to be removed, right?

It's cool if your team keeps doing it as long as they can live with being banned for it without making posts like this.
Starting to wonder who wants to get some attention here.

Offline Vieuxcrotter

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 47
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2012, 02:52:19 am »
-3
Both of them solid and the gate with holes actually.

So meow now you acknowledge that admin just use their power as they see fit. Or maybe we should all join KUTT clan im sure Para would protect us well.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2012, 02:55:42 am »
0
the gate door with holes: Legit for all reasons.

The solid doors, though grey area, it shouldn't be abused. It's just not right to be done. It's just like loads of other glitches that have been seen on the servers. Abusing them is not wrong, but it makes everyone look at you wrong and no one supports you if it is done.

Just stick to attacking through the Gate with holes since they are MADE for that.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Meow

  • Awesome Consulting Detective
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1071
  • Infamy: 150
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #20 on: November 17, 2012, 03:03:39 am »
0
Both of them solid and the gate with holes actually.

So meow now you acknowledge that admin just use their power as they see fit. Or maybe we should all join KUTT clan im sure Para would protect us well.

What do you mean now?
Told you I won't get into NA admin stuff on irc.
Also told you it's a grey area but technically it's exploiting.
I rather find it problematic that other admins think it's cool to do it.
Needs to be fixed to improve gameplay.

Offline Nightingale

  • Balancer
  • *
  • Renown: 925
  • Infamy: 205
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Elderly Woman
  • IRC nick: Nightingale
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2012, 06:03:54 am »
+6
I want official answer from legitimate admins about this new rule enforced on siege that you cannot attack thru door/gates, this include spears,throwing weapons,arrows,crossbow and all kind of weaponry.

Even clan KUTT was exclusively using this strategy including admins to defend castle at all cost.


I said solid doors when I warned DrDemento the first time, I even said It was just a warning and politely asked you guys to stop.

They generally are piking through doors with grids in them, However I'll keep a look out on them and everyone else poking/slashing/punching through "Solid" doors.

Both of them solid and the gate with holes actually.

So meow now you acknowledge that admin just use their power as they see fit. Or maybe we should all join KUTT clan im sure Para would protect us well.

No just Solid doors, Doors with a grids are fine.

Join any clan you want, Regardless of admins being in the clan. The rules stay the same.

something like this attacking through doors?

Yes.

Ok then , scilla can come here and say she made a mistake by banning me and Drdemento.

Yes, I am truly sorry you refused to cooperate with my simple request and was forced to ban you for 12 hours after you blatantly disregarded everything I said and didn't heed any of my multiple warnings.

I am obviously after attention because I posted in the general discussion forum about a 12 hour ban.

Peoples use it all the time, even clan that have admins have used this strategy intensively. But my greater concern is the fact that ITS NOT an official rule. Cause admin scilla started spewing her own ruling yesterday night on siege and throwing bans left and right to enforce something that is not stated as an official rule.

Not everything is on that list, spewing my own ruling? This thread seems like you are just fabricating complaints and stretching the truth.

Okay well i would love admin scilla to come here and give her version of all that shit now.

And yes i know scilla i went off on you and was impolite toward you, i am not here to discuss my ban i received.

And i would also love to hear from Para Kutt that perfectly know his clan are intensively exploiting this mechanic.

My version, I simply asked you to stop slashing with your claymore or any other weapon through solid doors, No one was even in any sort of trouble. You refused and argued about how I was corrupt for 30 mins, being as polite as I could to you people after multiple warnings and then you blatantly stand in front of me and continue to do the very thing I asked you nicely not to do...

As for the rules here is a link that meow already gave you http://forum.meleegaming.com/announcements/official-server-rules/

 
  • No exploiting of any kind
  • "first rule of em all: common sense" ~ chadz
  • Glitching is allowed, being an asshat isn't
- Hitting through solid doors is an "asshat" move.

« Last Edit: November 17, 2012, 06:32:25 am by Scilla »

Offline Vieuxcrotter

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 47
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #22 on: November 17, 2012, 07:21:57 am »
-4
Ok then how come Para Kutt and other admins been promoting that kind moves? And never any other admins in the game even warned anyone and even did that strategy themself?

Offline Para

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 170
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Para_KUTT, Slut_KUTT, Upper_KUTT, Ballmeat_KUTT, Ballmeat_Sandwich
  • IRC nick: Para_
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #23 on: November 17, 2012, 07:49:56 am »
+5
Ok then how come Para Kutt and other admins been promoting that kind moves? And never any other admins in the game even warned anyone and even did that strategy themself?
\

I ALWAYS warn people that they will be dealt with if they attack through solid doors, I'm sure other people can attest to that. I've never once "promoted" or advocated such a thing. Grated doors on the other hand, are fair game to stab through with a pike.
Woozle wuzzle?

Offline Vieuxcrotter

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 47
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #24 on: November 17, 2012, 08:21:48 am »
-3
Really Para ? You were on the server when Drdemento was slashing peoples thru doors you didnt say one single word. That kind of hypocrite, all the time i saw you admining you saw tons of peoples doing it and never you warned anyone and this include peoples from your own clan.

So i guess now this sudden change of reaction is to cover everyone ass?

Offline bilwit

  • Agent provocateur
  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 275
  • Infamy: 181
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The toast is anarchy!
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Billy_Whitmore, Andre_Whitmore, Gideon_Stargrave
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2012, 08:25:59 am »
+2
Clearly the solution to all of siege's problems is to free spook. #hediedforus
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Most of us are currently living off relatives, friends, parttime-jobs or savings, to be able to work as much and cheaply as possible.

Offline Froto_the_Loc

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 252
  • Infamy: 94
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • CRaPGame
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Locia
  • Game nicks: Froto_the_loc
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #26 on: November 17, 2012, 09:24:55 am »
0
How long has Desire been and admin?!

But, yeah, poking through a solid door is just douchey.
I remember when them crafty Craftys would poke straight through walls.
Hooray for customization and hybridization!
Down with monotonous pure classes!

Offline Muki

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 455
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • 偽善正義
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Exile
  • Game nicks: Muki
  • IRC nick: Muki, Muki39
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #27 on: November 17, 2012, 09:27:04 am »
+2
How long has Desire been and admin?!

But, yeah, poking through a solid door is just douchey.
I remember when them crafty Craftys would poke straight through walls.


mmm lets see since Nov 8?
(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

As a volunteer admin I clearly have no life and live only to eradicate all fun and enjoyment from the game. Your tears of rage are all the payment I need.
Yes I drew most of my avatars

Offline Smoothrich

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1558
  • Infamy: 986
  • cRPG Player
  • #manup @bigplays
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #28 on: November 17, 2012, 01:35:40 pm »
+3
Piking through solid walls is basically exploiting as far as I can tell.  Maybe you should've listened to the admin warning you instead of shit talking them, persisting to do it, then crying like a child when you inevitably got banned for disrupting the server with your shenanigans. 
My posting is like a katana folded 1000 times to perfection.. and the community is what keeps the edge sharp.. and bloody.  -  Me.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Digglez

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 573
  • Infamy: 596
  • cRPG Player
  • YOU INCOMPETENT TOH'PAH!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Northmen
  • Game nicks: GotLander, Hamarr, Digglesan, Black_D34th
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #29 on: November 17, 2012, 09:07:17 pm »
-2
http://forum.meleegaming.com/announcements/official-server-rules/

doesnt say anything about hitting thru doors in there.  hitting thru doors is a limitation/bug with the engine, just like hitslashing, gunna ban people for that too?

With changes to weapon collision most of the hitting thru solid doors went away, but people like Spook & RoberNamo used to milk it all the time, admins pretty much agreed it was fine and so prevalent it was unenforceable.