Author Topic: NA Siege rule discussion  (Read 5514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #60 on: November 19, 2012, 10:48:46 pm »
0
With as many members as we have and with PEOPLE LIKE TANKEN in the clan, I'd bet money that it HAS happened a few times

Haha, it was most probably Tanken; that was what I wanted to say initially but wasn't sure enough to do so. I was told that it was "fine". The gate had been open moments before and the team was en-route to open it again, so I was standing there in wait. Anyways, I'm not making a big fuss about it- I would've posted a ban request way back then if I really cared- just mentioning it because it was a situation that I remembered feeling salty about and it's moderately relevant to the conversation (that being, is it okay to stab through otherwise solid doors with long weapons which are basically exploits coded into the mod in the first place?)
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Elindor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1178
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Caelitus mihi vires
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Order of the Holy Guard
  • Game nicks: Elindor
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #61 on: November 19, 2012, 10:51:56 pm »
0
... long weapons which are basically exploits coded into the mod in the first place...

Source of this problem (and many others)

 :twisted:
Elindor, Archon of the Holy Guard
Holy Guard Thread :HERE
Banner Shop : HERE // Map Thread : HERE

Offline dreadnok

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 838
  • Infamy: 562
  • cRPG Player
  • fuck these jerkoff kids
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KBW<MB<SoW
  • Game nicks: Gorp_The_Gorger
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #62 on: November 19, 2012, 11:00:47 pm »
+2
Seriously, who gives a fuck. Just kill people
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Elindor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1178
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Caelitus mihi vires
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Order of the Holy Guard
  • Game nicks: Elindor
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #63 on: November 19, 2012, 11:23:38 pm »
+1
Seriously, who gives a fuck. Just kill people

A wise man once said...
Elindor, Archon of the Holy Guard
Holy Guard Thread :HERE
Banner Shop : HERE // Map Thread : HERE

Offline Xeen

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 84
  • Infamy: 9
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #64 on: November 19, 2012, 11:37:43 pm »
0
Haha, it was most probably Tanken; that was what I wanted to say initially but wasn't sure enough to do so. I was told that it was "fine". The gate had been open moments before and the team was en-route to open it again, so I was standing there in wait. Anyways, I'm not making a big fuss about it- I would've posted a ban request way back then if I really cared- just mentioning it because it was a situation that I remembered feeling salty about and it's moderately relevant to the conversation (that being, is it okay to stab through otherwise solid doors with long weapons which are basically exploits coded into the mod in the first place?)

I hear you man.  It just sucks that you bringing up that incredibly isolated incident is going to reinforce completely these other people's belief that this is not only a common occurrence, but also a conspiracy amongst the admins.

Offline Vieuxcrotter

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 47
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #65 on: November 19, 2012, 11:46:21 pm »
0
Seriously, who gives a fuck. Just kill people

I agree, should be able to kill peoples in any possible way. Its a video game not real life.

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #66 on: November 20, 2012, 12:58:01 am »
+1
Seriously, who gives a fuck. Just kill people

Sig'd.

Offline dreadnok

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 838
  • Infamy: 562
  • cRPG Player
  • fuck these jerkoff kids
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KBW<MB<SoW
  • Game nicks: Gorp_The_Gorger
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #67 on: November 20, 2012, 03:33:50 am »
0
Haha tommy. Sigh i miss game and the NA community
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #68 on: November 20, 2012, 04:06:18 am »
0
It's actually a WARBAND problem. You guys don't remember the door slashing do you? You used to be able to hit people by slashing them when breaking door. They...kinda fixed it, not really.

You can't fix the source engine, so it's a sad. It's also a rather unenforceable rule to try and police. Only if it's seen can it really be seen.

Also, everyone's done the damn door bullshit at some point in time so that's a non sequitor.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #69 on: November 20, 2012, 03:30:28 pm »
+2
5 pages of this?  It's being enforced as a rule, although maybe not easily enforced, it is.  It's not a ban the first time they see you do it, they were warning people to stop.  The OP got all uppity and thought his civil rights were being violated by a video game admin, and decided to show her who was boss.  He ended up being banned for a light period (24 hours is my guess) and hopefully learned his lesson to listen to authority figures or face the consequences. 

Lock this god awful thread already...and move it to the right forum (spam)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Aderyn

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 365
  • Infamy: 243
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Kalmar Union
  • Game nicks: Aderyn
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #70 on: November 20, 2012, 04:30:57 pm »
+1
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Can't spell manslaughter without laughter.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vieuxcrotter

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 47
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #71 on: November 20, 2012, 11:26:28 pm »
-2
5 pages of this?  It's being enforced as a rule, although maybe not easily enforced, it is.  It's not a ban the first time they see you do it, they were warning people to stop.  The OP got all uppity and thought his civil rights were being violated by a video game admin, and decided to show her who was boss.  He ended up being banned for a light period (24 hours is my guess) and hopefully learned his lesson to listen to authority figures or face the consequences. 

Lock this god awful thread already...and move it to the right forum (spam)

You sound mad. And you make quite nice story in your own mind.

Offline dreadnok

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 838
  • Infamy: 562
  • cRPG Player
  • fuck these jerkoff kids
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KBW<MB<SoW
  • Game nicks: Gorp_The_Gorger
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #72 on: November 21, 2012, 07:08:44 pm »
0
If you stand back enough with a long wep you cant get hit right? That pike wiggling shit over my head irks me more
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #73 on: November 21, 2012, 07:44:15 pm »
+2
You sound mad. And you make quite nice story in your own mind.

Haha right buddy, I'm the one who comes across as mad  :lol:  I literally am never emotional on a website forum page discussing video games.  Nice try though, maybe come back with an actual rebuttal of what I said, otherwise I'll assume what I've stated is correct.

From the description in this thread, it sounds like you were the angry one, and instead of just listening to the admin's decision, decided to bitch and complain about it for 30 minutes.  When you were punished for ignoring the admins rules, you decided to cry more on the forums, and people pointed and laughed at you.  But I'm the mad one  :lol:

Have a nice day, I sure as hell will.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Vieuxcrotter

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 47
  • Infamy: 118
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: NA Siege rule discussion
« Reply #74 on: November 22, 2012, 01:56:59 am »
-2
I came here on the forum to make sure there is clarification to the rules since even the admins on irc told me there was a grey spot so i decided to make the thread so at least everyone know what going on. Because honestly everyone used to do that shit including admins not so long ago, so hopefully the rules get updated to make it clear.

So yeah you can write your own story and act like i got my civil right violated by an internet admin i really dont give a fuck, if i cared so much about not being banned i would not have argued with the admin and i would have stopped from hitting peoples thru the door.