Poll

Should Crushthrough be completely removed?

Yes
38 (20.2%)
No
150 (79.8%)

Total Members Voted: 187

Author Topic: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough  (Read 4448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ironfox

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 50
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
  • Best in VA
    • View Profile
  • Faction: SoW,MB,Scarebears,PxC
  • Game nicks: Ironfox, ChinatownSuzy,Shiba
  • IRC nick: You Can't Box The Fox
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #45 on: January 19, 2012, 08:35:59 pm »
+2
You a dang fool.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #46 on: January 19, 2012, 08:53:51 pm »
0
Crush through weapons are really only useful with a teammate (preferably someone with a long stick or a sword/board).  If they are all alone they are easy targets.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Soldier_of_God

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 159
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Sir_Tristan, Archerfaggotry, Sir_Edward
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #47 on: January 20, 2012, 05:03:11 am »
0
I'm truly surprised that there are so many crush-through sympathizers. well, thats democracy for ya ;P

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #48 on: January 20, 2012, 05:27:00 am »
0
Honestly man, how many people have you seen pulling off a nice kick, constantly? Kicking is completely different story. When you speak of weapon countering than kicking and chambering are completely different story. The basics of kicking and chambering depends on every classes performance, they have no place in the current discussion....... :rolleyes:

No, it's not. Fact of the matter is that 1h gets affected most by kicks. Even without kicks, you'll be able to hit a shielder twice for every one of their hit quite often.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Nagasoup

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 42
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Sir_Donkey
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #49 on: January 20, 2012, 05:52:53 am »
-2
Lol at people saying shielders have an advantage over 2h  :lol:

Only noob 2h who can't block have trouble with shielders, but when fighting any skilled players the shield becomes a liability.

I voted yes because getting killed by crushthrough is the most rage-inducing thing that can happen in c-rpg. They're not OP, but I just really really REALLY hate them.

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #50 on: January 20, 2012, 05:56:08 am »
0
I voted yes because getting killed by crushthrough is the most rage-inducing thing that can happen in c-rpg. They're not OP, but I just really really REALLY hate them.

And this, folks, is a perfect example of why the Masses are often ignored.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Vexus

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 198
  • Infamy: 41
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Deus_Mortis
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #51 on: January 20, 2012, 10:34:11 am »
0
Well the poll speaks for itself.

Offline Mala

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 412
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #52 on: January 20, 2012, 09:55:13 pm »
+1
Well the poll speaks for itself.

Yepp, it shows a surpressed minority, so it should taken out of the game.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #53 on: February 07, 2012, 02:17:03 pm »
0
As much as non-crushthrough users hate the mechanic, it has a place in Warband, and cRPG. I wouldn't count on it going away, even if the poll results were the opposite. Protip: if you can't get out of range and you have no choice but to attempt to block an overhead from a Maul, jump up. Catching it earlier in the arc can reduce either the chance it'll break through or the damage if it does.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline The_Bloody_Nine

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 946
  • Infamy: 108
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • "I am still alive"
    • View Profile
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #54 on: February 07, 2012, 11:48:07 pm »
0
P.S

Are you a crushthrough sympathiser? read below

(click to show/hide)
haha :D

Offline FRANK_THE_TANK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1312
  • Infamy: 339
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • FluckCucker
    • View Profile
  • Faction: A Free and proud Peasant of Fisdnar!!!
  • Game nicks: FRANK_THE_TANK
  • IRC nick: Sippy sip
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2012, 03:38:47 am »
0
Chamber you useless gimp.
Fammi un pompino!

I think I have ball cancer in my right nut :(
Good news everybody! It's not nut cancer :)
Bad news everybody, I got dumped :(

Offline isatis

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 624
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • ink+water showing their true potential!
    • View Profile
    • le Clan des Cochons!
  • Faction: Le clan des Cochons!!
  • Game nicks: Cochon_Furtif_Isatis
  • IRC nick: Isatis
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #56 on: February 08, 2012, 04:04:45 am »
0
add that boulder on stick so we can see REAL crushthrought wep in action.
So the new response to ranged ragers is not "get a shield", it is "learn to chamber ranged nub!"
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Aleta

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 32
  • Infamy: 9
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Rhodok
  • Game nicks: Aleta, Diavolo
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #57 on: February 18, 2012, 02:06:41 am »
0
I say remove crushthrough weapons' ability to block and buff their stats a bit. (especially speed)

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 933
  • Infamy: 811
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #58 on: February 18, 2012, 02:19:57 am »
0
At least remove knockdown tag from crushtrough weapons. Having both is a bit OP.

Edit: Sorry, my bad. I forgoto that when you get hit by CT weapon and you survive you get knocked down. Pretty retarded game mechanics, if you ask me. They should just allow free hit trough block, not disable the dude for few seconds.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2012, 02:24:58 am by Leshma »

Offline karasu

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1751
  • Infamy: 316
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • D̶͎̳͒́͗͋ẹ͕̲̠̳̄̃͂ͤ͑ͮṃ̮͎̗̦̏̿͊ͤi̥̪̼͕ͦ̀̊̐ȗ̘rͩ͋̅̊gͭ̿̋
    • View Profile
Re: Vote No on Crushthrough (petition to remove crushthrough
« Reply #59 on: February 18, 2012, 02:25:48 am »
0
My signature never fails on these cases.