The fun is hitting a city/Castle and finding the trick of it. We were successful for every place but one.... Chaos your city SUCKS!
Did I miss something? NA done fighting or what? The boredom is setting in please help
Yep, it's weird... I got 2x 1600 Occitan army stationned at my castle for nearly 2 days now... no sign of aggression to speak off. :o
Even tried to kick them out of the castle for a possible reaction... didn't work... :(
Yep, it's weird... I got 2x 1600 Occitan army stationned at my castle for nearly 2 days now... no sign of aggression to speak off. :o
Even tried to kick them out of the castle for a possible reaction... didn't work... :(
Did I miss something? NA done fighting or what? The boredom is setting in please help
Hell even greasy sage agrees with me - check out my new sig :) :twisted:
Though I guess occitan has been spending the last 6 months preparing defenses for when all the many many factions not allied with them goes on the offensive against them. lol 7.5 million gold and 80K troops just in the fiefs with 3K armies marching around everywhere, what a waste.
If you know they are there and you can kick them out- why don't you attack them?
At least it would make this guy happy.
More on the subject tho - If you want them to attack you, why are you stacking 8-11k in each castle?
If you stick with 4500 i'm sure they would attack you since they wont have to throw their troops into the lake.
Answer to both questions... because I only have 3k troops in my castle... :rolleyes: :twisted:
Did I miss something? NA done fighting or what? The boredom is setting in please help
If you're distressed by the lack of XP and strat battle fun-times, you could certainly attack field armies or fiefs. At least de-garrisoning your cities would be nice as well. We've gotten tired of throwing ourselves against castle walls and we do not have an obligation to give you castle defenses. You took all the tickets out of the last 2 villages that you had so you could defend your castles. Ya'll can rot in there if you would like, or you could poke your heads out for a spell.
Lol, no worries, we get it. You suck at sieges compared to us when we attacked castles/cities and need to crutch hard on pikes and heavy cav to do well. Sour grapes mentality - you sucka t soemthing so you tell everyone you are not doing it because of the enemy, and not just because you are that bad. 2 sieges of a castle that has had less than 5K troops the entire time and then give up lol, because its 3K garrison too much.
You have 8-11k in ALL your castles apart from one. Or are you saying you are only willing to let them siege 1 castle at a time? Are you saying you are only willing to give up poor fallen out in ismirala castle? Nice protectors you are leaving them out in the cold like that.
We will happily lower our garrisons down in any fief upon request. If anyone has a fief of ours they wish to attack... contact Kesh or me and we shall see to reducing the garrison to 4500 troops so that a 1500 man army can lay siege and all can enjoy xp.
really can not win in this community... When we were marching and (yes taking castles and cities) we were harassed for being war mongering assholes.. Now that a very large portion of the map is allied we choose defense and get harassed for it as well.
In the tkov/LCO war how many times did LCO come out and fight in the open field? You guys are the aggressors... Try being aggressive! How the hell do you think we have all these castles and cities?
As Matey said if you want to attack somewhere we can arrange to have the troops in it lowered so you can attack with a decent amount of troops. We offer that and then you complain that we are doing that to our benefit! Really? It would be to the benefit of the community since we would force everything into prime time.
Ohay
Exactly, we repeatedly offer these things, hell remnant has been offering open field battle to chaos repeatedly, but somehow we are the devil for not doing exactly what people like sandy, daruvian and aderyn want us to do. We had to do 6-8 sieges to take a lot of these castles and cities, which we later sold or still retain and they were fun and challenging. Weird that anything that isnt incredibly easy like running over medium, armored opponent while riding around in full plate on a heavily armored horse or stabbing from 30 feet away with a pike is too much and you just give up. Its not like most of the cities/castles we attacked havent been brutal and difficult as attackers (hell just talk to remnant and try derchios even once, they also have offered to lower troops).Easiest gear setups? kesh take a break from the game once in awhile cause it's warping your mind to believe whatever you want.
We cant just leave 6K troops ona fief owner indefinitely for 4 months and bleed millions of gold because you might attack that one fief - we already tried that after we lost 50K troops attacking fidlgb and chaos and saw 4-5 months of almost no attacks to the point where now our castles and cities have very slowly built up to 10K troops. Your alliance has 200k+ troops and is bigger than velucan empire ever was, its not like you have to ever worry about running out. hell even VE had twice your balls and attacked defensible fiefs as many as 12-13 times. I guess imaginary e-peen using the easiest gear setups is the only way you can play this game - tactics and strategy dont matter.
Easiest gear setups? kesh take a break from the game once in awhile cause it's warping your mind to believe whatever you want.
lol you posted that as i was still finishing what i wrote. Didnt include you guys.The last battle I fought against FCC you guys put siege towers on your spawn flags.
I really hate you people.
Exactly, we repeatedly offer these things, hell remnant has been offering open field battle to chaos repeatedly, but somehow we are the devil for not doing exactly what people like sandy, daruvian and aderyn want us to do. We had to do 6-8 sieges to take a lot of these castles and cities, which we later sold or still retain and they were fun and challenging. Weird that anything that isnt incredibly easy like running over medium, armored opponent while riding around in full plate on a heavily armored horse or stabbing from 30 feet away with a pike is too much and you just give up. Its not like most of the cities/castles we attacked havent been brutal and difficult as attackers (hell just talk to remnant and try derchios even once, they also have offered to lower troops).
We cant just leave 6K troops ona fief owner indefinitely for 4 months and bleed millions of gold because you might attack that one fief - we already tried that after we lost 50K troops attacking fidlgb and chaos and saw 4-5 months of almost no attacks to the point where now our castles and cities have very slowly built up to 10K troops. Your alliance has 200k+ troops and is bigger than velucan empire ever was, its not like you have to ever worry about running out. hell even VE had twice your balls and attacked defensible fiefs as many as 12-13 times. I guess imaginary e-peen using the easiest gear setups is the only way you can play this game - tactics and strategy dont matter.
P.S. i don't actually include hospitallers in that estimation - they put in the effort and deservedly should have won eventually except their bigger ally didn't even do one attack the entire month they were attacking - thus freeing us to easily reinforce the city with 7-8 more armies. And i dont buy the inactive thing lancer - your S&D is used up daily for all your desert fiefs (we were considering grabbing some), never more than a few hundred, which says the fief owners are very very active when it comes to trading simulator, it takes far less effort to initiate one attack than to have 15-16 guys checking strategus daily to buy/sell their S&D. Its one of the reasons ve (and i agreed with their viewpoint) never wanted occitan to come back to na - they buy fiefs and turtle and never do anything, very similar to what their vassal lords did for multiple strategi - more focused on carebearing with most of the map than actually playing a war simulator and then patting each other on the back over beating up someone they outnumber 10:1. I miss people that actually play war games for challenges like tactics and strategy.
The last battle I fought against FCC you guys put siege towers on your spawn flags.
Every FCC city inventory I have seen recently is all plate + great mauls. Who the hell wants to fight that?lol oh yeah forgot about that. Well rather have just got use to them just using plate, mauls, and pikes.
Edit: but really Keshian do you expect me to come home after 12 hours out of my house, get a bite to eat, sit down at my PC and give a single fuck about some presumably greasy nerd hundreds of miles away talking about how his group of nerds is more brave at internet video games? Answer me that question before you go writing three more paragraphs. Protip: people don't give a fuck, and they're even less inclined to give a fuck when it's your empathy-less nerd ass repeatedly shitposting in their direction.
^Is either forgetting or never fought over Rindyar Castle...that's one castle I wouldn't waste my time with.
He did say City... not Castle :D I would also like to mention we launched a lot of attacks on Dhirim before we gave up. I agree that attacking over and over can get stale (been there done that) but just as daru gives no shits about how we want him to attack us... we also give no shits about him wanting us to fight him "fairly in the open field". If you guys want to be on the defensive then why did you launch a campaign against our lands? Plus.. why would we give a shit about our old villages? didn't you guys just reset the PP in all of them anyways? sounds like useless land to me.
In ayyike I didn't reset anything, I only loomed flamberges with the existing points.
He did say City... not Castle :D I would also like to mention we launched a lot of attacks on Dhirim before we gave up. I agree that attacking over and over can get stale (been there done that) but just as daru gives no shits about how we want him to attack us... we also give no shits about him wanting us to fight him "fairly in the open field". If you guys want to be on the defensive then why did you launch a campaign against our lands? Plus.. why would we give a shit about our old villages? didn't you guys just reset the PP in all of them anyways? sounds like useless land to me.
^Is either forgetting or never fought over Rindyar Castle...that's one castle I wouldn't waste my time with.
It was pretty bad. So far uphill that catapult shots are hard to make, only like 3 places that siege ladders will reach. You're welcome Sandy.
Edit: but really Keshian do you expect me to come home after 12 hours out of my house, get a bite to eat, sit down at my PC and give a single fuck about some presumably greasy nerd hundreds of miles away talking about how his group of nerds is more brave at internet video games? Answer me that question before you go writing three more paragraphs. Protip: people don't give a fuck, and they're even less inclined to give a fuck when it's your empathy-less nerd ass repeatedly shitposting in their direction.
Let it be noted that the only people who really fought over Rindyar were Occitan... And they did one attack and quit.
Too bad villages are apparently useless and are not worth the effort of recapture.
So much for the mod.
Pretty sure he is 100% serious. Ban horses.
Also still not sure if Aldo was being serious or not (probably semi-serious at least) with your quote. Since he's always been my favorite couching target, I'll assume he loves me as well and was only jesting.
well.. villages get 1PP a day, so it takes awhile to get them decent. if you respec the PP you lose 50% of total pp but can reallocate the remaining 50%. If you run around capping enemy villages and respeccing them you can easily turn them into completely useless fiefs. Also, since castles and towns get way more PP per day you can just build those up to be amazing in terms of gear production and trade value. Since this strat has been going on for so damn long... we can easily thrive with only our castles and towns. According to the Market Size pie graph.. we are apparently the biggest market even without any villages... though I don't know how it measures market size. http://c-rpg.net/?page=strategusfieflist
In the tkov/LCO war how many times did LCO come out and fight in the open field?
Literally the whole war, they re-took villages over and over again, and they actually defended their villages when they had the resources to.
I never hated Kesh or FCC...there were legitimately two people in Hospi who "hated" FCC and/or Kesh, that wanted to hold a grudge from the previous strat iterations there is presently only one (who is pretty inactive). There were some people who felt it would be hard to trust FCC after past relations, but I refuse to believe that there are many people out there who hate people over a video game.
I even tried working with Kesh at the beginning to fuck over KUTT since they were trying to be badasses with us and not agree to good terms on transferring of a castle.
I honestly think it's less people "hating" one side or the other, and more about self preservation (or holding grudges against past enemies). I think huge alliances (or at least favoritism) is inevitable...no clue how you avoid that.
Maybe devs can just "make" a couple strat battles every night so we can still get our fix (I really don't care about who owns what pixel crack...I just want to fight in large organized battles).
To: FIDLGB, Astralis, FPF, Golden Apple Corps, Dracul, Ascalon clan, and of course BIRD CLAN. You guys are doing it right, stay independent and free.
*Anders was left off this list for being utterly boring in strat while perpetuating the KDR whore mentality with the NA losses thread for his own profit.
To: FIDLGB, Astralis, FPF, Golden Apple Corps, Dracul, Ascalon clan, and of course BIRD CLAN. You guys are doing it right, stay independent and free.
*Anders was left off this list for being utterly boring in strat while perpetuating the KDR whore mentality with the NA losses thread for his own profit.
Wait, what? I'm more interesting than Astralis. They like fought 3 battles and then curb stomped some chinese?
Also, on that list, only Ascalon, FPF, could be counted as true neutral.
(Am unsure over Dracul as they did just have their Acre War)
Also, cause of this, I'm going Pirate. Screw Ninja's.(click to show/hide)
10% of what forces? Who's even attacking right now (in general)?
Please yolo @ Rindyar Castle, pretty please...I want to be on the defending side of a hard as fuck castle, been in too many terrible assaults lately. This will also give FCC the chance to prove how superior of a faction they are.
Yeah we don't make siege towers over spawns points which fcc did my last strat battle with fcc. Add that to the list of exploits fcc lives to use to win. Doubt any na strat has used half as many exploits as fcc has.
Yeah, those siege towers or whatever really prevented the flag cap that was never going to happen.why put them on top of your spawn flags?
Our record speaks for itself at this point. Name a faction on either side who can say they have taken as many fortified places as us?
Nova Reyvadin
Nova Curaw
New Derchios Castle
New Senuzgda Castle
New Kelredan Castle
New Sungetche Castle.. least i think we took this one by force. Can not remember
New Ichamur
New Ahmerrad ** would have been ours but not going into that again
I am probably forgetting some. I do not think we have anything left to prove on the siege front. Your entire alliance could not produce a list like that.
You are better than us at taking fortified locations. You've got great organization and your mercenary roster is very conducive to winning sieges set upon a fortified location. We performed very well in field and village battles because of our mercenary roster. We've got a ton of both agi and str polearms and plain-jane shielders with a few very skilled cavalry players mixed in. You've got a good deal of ranged players and two-handed users. We were extremely victorious in the village/field attacks we did, capping flags more than once in a glorious fashion and burning the tickets out when we did not. We blow cocks at attacking fortified locations in comparison.
I am not claiming that either force is superior outside of the situation in which it performs best. Forgive us if we need a bit of time to recuperate our desire to be mauled and arbalested to hell and back. We'll get back to attacking you, but like I said, if you are dying of thirst for blood, attack an LCO-occupied village or even one of our empty ones. If you can survive a week or two we'll get right back to charging your stone walls.
Any further posts I make in this thread can be written-off as a vaguely autistic need to reply to statements which I interpret as "COME AT US OMG PUSSIES WE DID THIS LIKE 6 TIMES WHY CANT YOU?"
I will agree with most of that honestly. Fighting you guys in the open field I do not really mind.. it is the tons of cav that come with it I can do without. Fcc used to be more well rounded but the cav portion of our group faded away when huey left and have not really been the same since. We can still field a few decent guys but not nearly the amount needed in a pitched open field fight.
To: FIDLGB, Astralis, FPF, Golden Apple Corps, Dracul, Ascalon clan, and of course BIRD CLAN. You guys are doing it right, stay independent and free.
*Anders was left off this list for being utterly boring in strat while perpetuating the KDR whore mentality with the NA losses thread for his own profit.
To me it seems like you guys have more cavalry than us, but we have a few great cavalry players (huseby coming to mind first, I never see that dude get a bad bump in) that don't fuck our team over while you have more cavalry that tends to teambump much more. I find it surprising the amount of times I have been too brave and find myself engaging 3v1 and enemy cavalry bumps 2 of them and gets me a safe retreat or even 3 kills. Much more important than that though is our devastating amount of long polearms, mostly pikes. You have a significant amount of cavalry over us, but it will only detriment you when our wall of poke-sticks is impenetrable.
Odd I never feel like we have a lot of cav... but yes I will also agree ours tend to care more about getting kills instead of who they knock over to get them. I also feel that the reason we have less cav is due to the walls of pikes.
oh geeee
Acting all big and tough about past victories in castles taken when it's been a small clan against the grand alliance of FCC (several clans) AND other clans such as tkov, raven etc. Must be really difficult kicking someone when they are on the ground surrounded by your other friends who have already restrained them and kicked them for half an hour. douchebag
Forgot us, Ravens!
Whoa.. We are allied to Ravens and TKoV? I'll be... Ravens... what the fuck were you doing attacking us when you were allied to us? and TKoV how come you keep doing your own thing instead of attacking our enemies? You guys are terrible allies.
What has tkov done for is this strat exactly that helped us take any of those? if your logic holds true and it was simple numbers and more allies that won us those places, what the hell is your excuse for not taking jack shit in this current war?
To: FIDLGB, Astralis, FPF, Golden Apple Corps, Dracul and their vassals Raven I mean allies, Ascalon clan, and of course BIRD CLAN. You guys are doing it right, stay independent and free.
I will agree with most of that honestly. Fighting you guys in the open field I do not really mind.. it is the tons of cav that come with it I can do without. Fcc used to be more well rounded but the cav portion of our group faded away when huey left and have not really been the same since. We can still field a few decent guys but not nearly the amount needed in a pitched open field fight.
what the fuck Gmno
really can not win in this community... When we were marching and (yes taking castles and cities) we were harassed for being war mongering assholes.. Now that a very large portion of the map is allied we choose defense and get harassed for it as well.
In the tkov/LCO war how many times did LCO come out and fight in the open field? You guys are the aggressors... Try being aggressive! How the hell do you think we have all these castles and cities?
As Matey said if you want to attack somewhere we can arrange to have the troops in it lowered so you can attack with a decent amount of troops. We offer that and then you complain that we are doing that to our benefit! Really? It would be to the benefit of the community since we would force everything into prime time.
Ohay
oh geeee
Acting all big and tough about past victories in castles taken when it's been a small clan against the grand alliance of FCC (several clans) AND other clans such as tkov, raven ...
... Raven never helped FCC take anything over except villages that had to be retaken... we then went to war with FCC shortly after. I think your mixing something up here.
Edit: If you for some odd reason do not believe me, then talk to Frisia and they can confirm everything Raven did at that time period.
Actually they came to the rescue when hosp attacked your lands and together you pushed hosp back wich later led to ichamur being taken. Would not have happened if FCC was alone in all of this, nor Raven.
The point i was making is that whenever they take a castle and feel so cool about how they can take a castle it's about 5-9 clans vs 1-2. They don't fight unless they have other clans with them even tho they are a massive alliance of clans. It's the way it's always been.
Actually they came to the rescue when hosp attacked your lands and together you pushed hosp back wich later led to ichamur being taken. Would not have happened if FCC was alone in all of this, nor Raven.
The point i was making is that whenever they take a castle and feel so cool about how they can take a castle it's about 5-9 clans vs 1-2. They don't fight unless they have other clans with them even tho they are a massive alliance of clans. It's the way it's always been.
As a sidenote, you do know i don't represent hosp on strat anymore right?
Actually they came to the rescue when hosp attacked your lands and together you pushed hosp back wich later led to ichamur being taken. Would not have happened if FCC was alone in all of this, nor Raven.
The point i was making is that whenever they take a castle and feel so cool about how they can take a castle it's about 5-9 clans vs 1-2. They don't fight unless they have other clans with them even tho they are a massive alliance of clans. It's the way it's always been.
wat
Ravens were not alone when they pushed back Hosp, they had Frisia and Dracul as well. FCC actually didn't do much in the field and after taking back the Fimbulvetr fiefs with us they basically diverted all of their resources to Ichamur. Meanwhile, Fimbulvetr was consistently taking your fiefs and sending your guys to EU.
Like I said above, we didn't do much at all to help them besides attacking villages and field armies.
Who do you hate more, Kesh or Arowaine? That is what I believe Strat 4.0 has been reduced too and the majority of active strat clans are on whatever side of the two mega-alliance war.
If you want strat to be good again both sides need to end the war, break up with their strat allies, bury the internet grudges, and let people go their separate ways. Troop stacking will go down and the number of battles per-day will rise. I guarantee it will fix the dilemma we have now. It is probably just easier to reset it though. (Kesh, if you +1 this then you actually better commit to doing it.)
To: FIDLGB, Astralis, FPF, Golden Apple Corps, Dracul and their vassals Raven I mean allies, Ascalon clan, and of course BIRD CLAN. You guys are doing it right, stay independent and free.
*Anders was left off this list for being utterly boring in strat while perpetuating the KDR whore mentality with the NA losses thread for his own profit.
in fact occitan is only ally with mb/fupa(this is a fact) atm as far as i know and have good relation with severtal faction cause we do have comun ennemy and well fcc is so fucking big 200 player + so people just fear them and cant do any move cause they all know fcc is opportunist (nothing bad there ) but this is the way they play.
its like saying fcc is ally with raven/tkov you know
ps: as our stand rigth now we do not have the time to prepare army/manage equipement make strategic move and lead battle!
P.s. Aderyn... Who did we gang up with when we fought CHAOS and took three castles and even came close on dhirim before Frisia and Mates poured reinforcements into it.
Can't remember if RoR and those other people was with you at the time or if that was after you gave it to them, but it's still grand alliance FCC vs small clans of 10 or less people :P. It might be one of the few castles derchio and senesomething that is that you took without another clan doing alot of work for you. That said it's still ~10clans vs 1-2 because of how many that is inside FCC but would still be exempt from my original point ofcourse if RoR and the others wasn't with you at the time.
I request that we insult one another's personal lives instead of making the circular argument of
"you have more players"
"no you have more players!"
Very few people in any clan have the desire to play on the strategus map anymore; most only want XP. Both sides probably have more than half of their raw numbers partially or completely inactive. Just be satisfied in your personal knowledge that the other block has more active players than your own. After all, truth is subjective and nothing is going to convince you that your truth is incorrect.
I think I just got cut on those edges there. Did you switch your degree from psychology to philosophy?
The only person whose words hold meaning regarding the FCC is Kamikaze Joe.
Fcc used to be more well rounded but the cav portion of our group faded away when huey left and have not really been the same since.
We also took on KUTT solo rather than fighting against hosp who already had enough enemies.
Wat.Remnants? if that's what your thinking.
Pretty sure KUTT was betrayed by whatstheirname who currently held 1/3 of their total army and joined you guys.
teutonics! Those are the ones.Oh yes teutonics had a thing with KUTT if i remember (AoW now) and some kind of MERC argeement with the rems and KUTT
Oh yes we had a thing with KUTT if i remember (AoW now) some kind of alliance had to do with Rems and KUTT and stuff.
no.http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/nap-or-slap/msg674833/#msg674833
teutonic bailed out on their alliance. remnant was always against kutt, who the hell are you and where did you get these ideas? even anders knows better.
no.
teutonic bailed out on their alliance. remnant was always against kutt, who the hell are you and where did you get these ideas? even anders knows better.
http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/nap-or-slap/msg674833/#msg674833
Just want to post before this escalates into a shit-fest, which was only partially my intention :twisted:, that Sauce clarified with me that Remnant is apparently not apart of TAMDA, as I suppose I misunderstood from Elindor's writings. The NAP, while the merc support for the opposition seems questionable has been written off as nothing more than mercs just wanting xp.
What was hazy was what sides Remnant members could sign up for, because fuck it we want exp too right?moar xp
Rehashing Kutt war?
Fine here: Kutt got invaded(loosely) by 2 factions, ME at Ulburban, and FCC at the snowy side. Following KUTTs rather dismal start, Tuetonics bowed out of KUTT alliance and joined FCC. Thus, KUTT became a 3:1, but I bowed out at Ulburban, and KUTT collapsed because they weren't ready on strat at all.
Thus, technically, it was a 3 on 1 war in favor of FCC.
I think by the end it was FCC, Remnant/HG, Dragoni of Valahia, The Coalition and Teutonic Knights.
These are from the archive on my old abandoned ghost town war alliance (http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/wars-and-alliances-na/) thread on 10/24/12(click to show/hide)
and then 11/10/12 when KUTT was down to their last two fiefs.(click to show/hide)
Rehashing Kutt war?
Fine here: Kutt got invaded(loosely) by 2 factions, ME at Ulburban, and FCC at the snowy side. Following KUTTs rather dismal start, Tuetonics bowed out of KUTT alliance and joined FCC. Thus, KUTT became a 3:1, but I bowed out at Ulburban, and KUTT collapsed because they weren't ready on strat at all.
Thus, technically, it was a 3 on 1 war in favor of FCC.
Anders, I think everyone would be hard pressed to count you as an actual clan. You did use your mercenary army just once for an attack, but you are only one merc. To count a clan as a whole, you also need to consider mercenary roster support.
For example, I don't think Coalition and KUTT actually fought each other.
We started the fight with KUTT by attacking their caravan carrying critical supplies just prior to the full-fledged FCC invasion.
CHAOS, Occitan, and several others (as can be seen in the image) declared war on us, besieging our army in Ismirala Castle and preventing our participation. They couldn't beat us since Ismirala is the hardest castle to take.
Ended up a boring ass stalemate and nobody had fun or XP for weeks.
Sounds kinda of familiar. Not that it's anyone's fault. The game incentivizes inactivity in this regard, which is pretty awful. Something should be done about it.
We started the fight with KUTT by attacking their caravan carrying critical supplies just prior to the full-fledged FCC invasion.
CHAOS, Occitan, and several others (as can be seen in the image) declared war on us, besieging our army in Ismirala Castle and preventing our participation. They couldn't beat us since Ismirala is the hardest castle to take.
Ended up a boring ass stalemate and nobody had fun or XP for weeks.
Sounds kinda of familiar. Not that it's anyone's fault. The game incentivizes inactivity in this regard, which is pretty awful. Something should be done about it.
wasnt it Tilbault castle? Or Rindyar? Hmm
Rindyar is the castle I gave Sandersson for the low low price of one sloppy handjob.
Yeah, those siege towers or whatever really prevented the flag cap that was never going to happen.Why place the siege towers right atop your own spawn flags? Thought that sort of gameplay was against the rules.
Why place the siege towers right atop your own spawn flags? Thought that sort of gameplay was against the rules.
I don't know specifically which battle you're complaining about
Don't worry, he doesn't know either. He's usually just rambling to stir up some shit.http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5042