cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 05:34:17 am

Title: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 05:34:17 am
So whats up with the new iron fist of NA Admins being butthurt kids over things typed from a keyboard and abusing there powers left and right. Constant Pinktext constant banning. Party Girl of bird especially needs to go.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Dexxtaa on March 27, 2013, 05:35:46 am
My favorite time was when they started talking without context and then the mudslide naked people came in.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Canuck on March 27, 2013, 05:51:25 am
I tend to agree with the rules to a certain extent. Of course the admins shouldn't go around banning people constantly for a little bit of shit-mouth, but the servers really could do with a little less ignorant shit talking. The mutes seem to be working, and keep in mind this is the first attempt at a new approach for the admins against a community that has been free to say pretty much whatever they want for a long time. I completely understand the desire for freedom, but is it really necessary to be incessantly spewing hate speech all the time? This is the internet, and people should definitely grow a thick skin if they want to enjoy it, but it does kind of get out of control.

Keep working on firm enforcement of the anti-hate speech rules, but adjust them so the admins don't have to be banning/kicking/muting people every time they say bundle of sticks. You can usually tell the difference.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 06:35:45 am
This is the internet, and people should definitely grow a thick skin if they want to enjoy it,
Thank you, as for the rest of your post i disagree.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Canuck on March 27, 2013, 06:38:25 am
Thank you, as for the rest of your post i disagree.
Thankfully this is the internet! :P
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: kasMVC on March 27, 2013, 06:43:37 am
The only people I call bundle of stickss are admins because they are
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 06:48:29 am
Context is all-important. I can call my homie a bundle of sticks and he won't mind a bit. We'll get enjoyment out of it. If anyone finds it upsetting, they can mute me themselves.

If I call someone a bundle of sticks because they just lost the round for our team, I can see why action would need to be taken against them.

Simple words should not be the cause of offense; context and intended meaning should be. A dichotomy of "good words" and "bad words" is an over-simplification that is only appropriate for a child.

When you find yourself offended because of the use of a word, you are making a conscious decision to interpret that word as offensive. The burden should be on the listener to take action to protect him or herself from speech they find offensive rather than censor everyone.

Obviously, very few people share my viewpoint, so the rules will not change to fit it. That's fine. I'd just like to voice my opinion that more focus should be on the hostility or malicious intent of the speaker, rather than the words that he or she spoke.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 07:01:31 am
Think of all the things in the past that were acceptable at the time and are abhorrent now and consider it is because society decided collectively it was no longer acceptable to treat each other that way.  Get on the right side of history.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Pentecost on March 27, 2013, 07:15:49 am
Go back to /b/, imbecile.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Arathian on March 27, 2013, 07:45:12 am
Go back to /b/, imbecile.

Sometimes not wanting a heavy handed admin approach is not just because you are from /b/ or whatever.
I don't know what the OP is talking about however.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 07:47:36 am
Sometimes not wanting a heavy handed admin approach is not just because you are from /b/ or whatever/
I don't know what the OP is talking about however.

You should uh.

Look at his name.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Arathian on March 27, 2013, 07:54:27 am
You should uh.

Look at his name.

ohhhhhhhhhhhhh

rity

No further comments from me.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Ganner on March 27, 2013, 10:04:11 am
My favorite time was when they started talking without context and then the mudslide naked people came in.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Dexx, all of your replies must now contain a patrick GIF.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Armpit_Sweat on March 27, 2013, 11:14:56 am
Go back to /b/, imbecile.

/b/ <-- bestest internet has to offer for your eyes, mind and genitalia.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Vibe on March 27, 2013, 11:17:50 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2013, 11:47:27 am
I do not have to support your use of the word f@ggot but I will troll to the death for your right to say it, you racist frenchman.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Equal on March 27, 2013, 02:17:28 pm
Soo people are getting muted for typing naughty words now? I remember Ganner muted me because I said nigga pls once, but I didn't really think it was tyrannical just strict.

Does this mean saying I'm gay in chat means I'll get banned now?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 02:24:37 pm
Basically this is tears of destiny 2.0 people. Absolutely disgusting that the Mods can abuse their powers in the name of MUH FEELINGS
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: [ptx] on March 27, 2013, 02:26:05 pm
As a sign of solidarity with my oppressed NA brethren, may i suggest
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

as the FREE CHAT 2013 sig?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 02:29:42 pm
As a sign of solidarity with my oppressed NA brethren, may i suggest
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

as the FREE CHAT 2013 sig?
Thank you ptx a lot of people in this game are bundle of stickss just now all of a sudden butthurt bundle of sticksry is a good excuse to punish people and use walls of pink text because everyone is a special snowflake.

Soo people are getting muted for typing naughty words now? I remember Ganner muted me because I said nigga pls once, but I didn't really think it was tyrannical just strict.

Does this mean saying I'm gay in chat means I'll get banned now?

Ganner suffers from white guilt.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Turboflex on March 27, 2013, 02:42:06 pm
self loathing white people are history's greatest monsters
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 03:32:46 pm
At least it's a move in the direction of the game being a product of a real company and not just a Stormfront chat program with a knights minigame in the background.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: MrShine on March 27, 2013, 03:49:00 pm
Here are the facts of the matter for anyone who wasn't on last night.

- NA Admins were asked to more strictly enforce chat rules against casual discriminatory chat.  Please note that these rules have always been there, we've just been lenient on enforcing them.
- There was confusion surrounding the new enforcement policy, as not all admins were aware of the change and players were not made aware of the new enforcement policy.
- There was confusion surrounding Partyboy as a newly added admin who was enforcing newly added policies.

I understand why people are upset: the way this was rolled out was confusing, and the specifics regarding how those rules were to be enforced are still being decided on.  A lot of people raised a lot of good questions when I was online about what this means/what can and can't be said, and I'm sorry that I don't have answers for you yet.

But

The goal of the changes are to reduce the level of casual bigotry found on the servers, and I believe that goal to have merit.  Regardless of how exactly this rule evolves, the fact of the matter is bigotry and casual discriminatory chat has become the norm - that is probably the reason many of you are so upset, because the word's inherent meaning has become mixed. 

And trust me - I get it - we all recognize that calling your friend a 'my old friend' is different from angrily calling someone a 'fucking f@ggot', just like saying 'my nigga' to a pal is different from slurring a black person as a 'friend'.  The intent behind the words in all these scenarios is different, but the point of the new enforcement policies is to make people more aware of what they are actually literally saying

The common sense TLDR version is just be more mindful of what you're saying.  The rules will probably continue to adjust & evolve, but I think it's a good idea to get used to the idea that less casual discriminatory chat will be acceptable in the near future. 

Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 27, 2013, 03:57:10 pm
If you can't play the game without having to use discriminatory slurs, you don't deserve to play at all.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kafein on March 27, 2013, 04:01:17 pm
If you can't play the game without having to use discriminatory slurs, you don't deserve to play at all.

Is "my old friendcher" discriminatory ?


If yes, what group is supposed to be offended ?

Btw except very few people that use their mouths like trashcans, the swearing is pretty light on EU servers.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 04:09:50 pm
Is "my old friendcher" discriminatory ?


If yes, what group is supposed to be offended ?

You know, you could always go and learn for yourself what is discriminatory and what is not.  There is no shortage of first hand accounts of the effects of bigotry.  Although, I will warn you, realizing you've been in the wrong all your life is an uncomfortable feeling and it's a lot easier to just go on doing it than admit it.

Education should be sought out and not forced upon, but here we are anyways.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 27, 2013, 04:23:01 pm
Is "my old friendcher" discriminatory ?


If yes, what group is supposed to be offended ?

Btw except very few people that use their mouths like trashcans, the swearing is pretty light on EU servers.

Yeah it is pretty offensive to have a derogative term for a group of people claimed as a general term for anything bad or annoying. How is it any different than calling someone a "nigcher" or some such? It's not and if you don't find that offensive either then you don't deserve the right to talk about this stuff.

And if anything, it's worse on EU since you guys all think you're so further ahead than americans when in reality you're just as bad.

"wolves_skono_the_my old friend" and other wonderful things.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 04:34:46 pm

And trust me - I get it - we all recognize that calling your friend a 'my old friend' is different from angrily calling someone a 'fucking f@ggot', just like saying 'my nigga' to a pal is different from slurring a black person as a 'friend'.  The intent behind the words in all these scenarios is different, but the point of the new enforcement policies is to make people more aware of what they are actually literally saying


How about instead of trying to censor what words people can and cannot say, people just accept that it's not an inflammatory remark anymore and start being offended by something important.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 04:36:12 pm
How about instead of trying to censor what words people can and cannot say, people just accept that it's not an inflammatory remark anymore and start being offended by something important.

Try yelling slurs in a restaurant and see how long it takes before you're asked to leave or ejected.  This isn't the government telling you what you can and can't say, this is a privately owned server.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 04:37:27 pm
Try yelling slurs in a restaurant and see how long it takes before you're asked to leave or ejected.  This isn't the government telling you what you can and can't say, this is a privately owned server.

Congratulations on missing the point of what I said. Feel free to read it a few more times and try again.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Nehvar on March 27, 2013, 04:38:06 pm
/b/ <-- bestest internet has to offer for your eyes, mind and genitalia.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


If that's not a case for justifiable homicide I don't know what is.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Turboflex on March 27, 2013, 04:49:08 pm
If you admins want to improve the game how about doing something about all the high level leechers who spawn with cloth and peasant weapons for hours or days on end? Much worse for quality of gameplay than the usual internet white noise of mild obscenity.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 04:49:35 pm
Congratulations on missing the point of what I said. Feel free to read it a few more times and try again.

Sorry, I've heard so many straight white male* excuses that they start to blur together.

*not saying everyone here is a SWM, but it's almost always two out of the three.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 27, 2013, 05:11:32 pm
How about instead of trying to censor what words people can and cannot say, people just accept that it's not an inflammatory remark anymore and start being offended by something important.

who are you to say it's not inflammatory?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lord_Bernie_of_Voodoo on March 27, 2013, 05:12:22 pm
self loathing white people are history's greatest monsters

+1
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 05:18:01 pm
who are you to say it's not inflammatory?

It's inflammatory to people who allow it to be so, but let's face it, a large majority of the time it's used (at least around me) it's not meant in an offensive manner. The only reason people get all up in arms anymore is because they've been told to. Unless you're gay, who are you to decide bundle of sticks is offensive?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Miley on March 27, 2013, 05:19:34 pm
So whats up with the new iron fist of NA Admins being butthurt kids over things typed from a keyboard and abusing THEIR powers left and right. Constant Pinktext constant banning. Party Girl of bird especially needs to go.

I AGREE TO SOME DEGREE.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 05:20:44 pm
Sorry, I've heard so many straight white male* excuses that they start to blur together.

*not saying everyone here is a SWM, but it's almost always two out of the three.

For some reason I'm not surprised to see the "CIS Scum" card played.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 05:23:19 pm
Has anyone ever wondered why you can count the number of openly female or gay players on NA with both hands and still have enough fingers left over to plug your ears and say, "na na na na"?  Because suggesting someone is homosexual is considered to be the most insulting thing you can say to someone on here and if you're a woman then you deal with being called a whore and worse, specifically because you're a woman, when you kill someone just because you outplay them.  Either that or you're a fake gamer girl who can't play games.  And that's from the general population and not the individuals that constantly creep on and cyber stalk you.

Sure, the devs managed to get a bunch of cash out of you to bankroll their new game.  But it's hard to expand their audience when their current userbase is alienating, not just minority groups, but normal, decent people.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Miley on March 27, 2013, 05:26:26 pm
Has anyone ever wondered why you can count the number of openly female or gay players on NA with both hands and still have enough fingers left over to plug your ears and say, "na na na na"?  Because suggesting someone is homosexual is considered to be the most insulting thing you can say to someone on here and if you're a woman then you deal with being called a whore and worse, specifically because you're a woman, when you kill someone just because you outplay them.  Either that or you're a fake gamer girl who can't play games.  And that's from the general population and not the individuals that constantly creep on and cyber stalk you.

Sure, the devs managed to get a bunch of cash out of you to bankroll their new game.  But it's hard to expand their audience when their current userbase is alienating, not just minority groups, but normal, decent people.

CAN I GIVE YOU MORE +1s?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 05:31:47 pm
Has anyone ever wondered why you can count the number of openly female or gay players on NA with both hands and still have enough fingers left over to plug your ears and say, "na na na na"?  Because suggesting someone is homosexual is considered to be the most insulting thing you can say to someone on here and if you're a woman then you deal with being called a whore and worse, specifically because you're a woman, when you kill someone just because you outplay them.  Either that or you're a fake gamer girl who can't play games.  And that's from the general population and not the individuals that constantly creep on and cyber stalk you.

Sure, the devs managed to get a bunch of cash out of you to bankroll their new game.  But it's hard to expand their audience when their current userbase is alienating, not just minority groups, but normal, decent people.

It's also worth considering that these groups are minorities everywhere on the internet. I promise you, being supremely strict on "offensive" language will not bring diversity to cRPG. The only thing it will do is drive existing players away. Sure, you consider that a good thing since those players are obvious "bigots" since they choose to use language interpreted by some as a slur.

The only girl I've ever heard directly insulted was Winterly, which was very sad yeah. She was all like "here!" during rollcall for a battle and people were like "LOL IS THAT A 12 YEAR OLD BOY?"

Yeah, that's fucked up. Winterly was really nice to everyone, a good player, and I enjoyed her company. Really good battle-buddy to have. I've been playing for a good amount of time, and being a gigantic nerd, I play a LOT. EVERYONE is called "whore, slut, etc". If those insults were reserved for women, that'd be one thing. They're simply general insults to the vast population.

You've got to understand that the reality is not that women, homosexuals, transexuals, or whatever alienated minority group are not driven away because certain words are used in-game. I wish that were the case, because then you'd be rightfully crusading. I love playing with all sorts. It's interesting to hear different viewpoints on all kinds of shit that I wouldn't normally hear. However, member of those minority groups simply NEVER SET FOOT IN THIS GAME.

The fact is, those minority groups simply do not play online video games in the numbers that white male nerds do. There's very little that we can do about it. They're simply uninterested.

Furthermore; if anyone plays with me you damn well know that I don't say shit that I think would make people feel bad. One of my main goals in life is to make other people happier as best I can. I love everyone! Truly, I do! However, I still hold the firm belief that the burden should lie on the listener to take proactive measures to safeguard his or her feelings; it should not lie on administration to safeguard others.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 05:32:46 pm
Has anyone ever wondered why you can count the number of openly female or gay players on NA with both hands and still have enough fingers left over to plug your ears and say, "na na na na"?  Because suggesting someone is homosexual is considered to be the most insulting thing you can say to someone on here and if you're a woman then you deal with being called a whore and worse, specifically because you're a woman, when you kill someone just because you outplay them.  Either that or you're a fake gamer girl who can't play games.  And that's from the general population and not the individuals that constantly creep on and cyber stalk you.

Sure, the devs managed to get a bunch of cash out of you to bankroll their new game.  But it's hard to expand their audience when their current userbase is alienating, not just minority groups, but normal, decent people.

Unfortunately this argument doesn't hold water because, first, nobody cares if you're gay or female. Pointing something like that out about yourself is frowned upon because it's unnecessary to know to play a video game. (ie. it's considered looking for attention.)

Second, welcome to every game community in the history of online multiplayer. If you honestly think using such 'offensive' words is keeping players away, then you must not play many other games.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Knute on March 27, 2013, 05:39:16 pm
Hmm, I've got mixed feelings about this because cRPG has always been a safe place for these people to be themselves.

Every day they walk around in public keeping their true selves private from friends, family, coworkers and even girlfriends in a few cases because they know society generally looks down on homophobic/racist speech.  So many times during the day they probably want to casually use the n-word or call someone a "bundle of sticks" but can't without risking losing their job or being ostracized by their classmates.  Then they get home at night, pour a glass of chard and transport themselves to a fabulous medieval world where they can "come out of the closet" so to speak and chat with guys who are just like them.

It's too bad Gorath doesn't play cRPG anymore because it'd be interesting to hear his opinion on this subject.  He was an outspoken advocate of gay chat rights in medieval combat simulators and was frequently muted by the powers that be because of this.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 05:40:22 pm
Unfortunately this argument doesn't hold water because, first, nobody cares if you're gay or female. Pointing something like that out about yourself is frowned upon because it's unnecessary to know to play a video game. (ie. it's considered looking for attention.)

Second, welcome to every game community in the history of online multiplayer. If you honestly think using such 'offensive' words is keeping players away, then you must not play many other games.

You seriously don't understand the difference between "I don't mean it when I say it" and a person who could have been bullied their entire life for it and may have had one or several traumatic experiences because of it.  If only there was a word for that (it's "privilege)".  And I'm not just talking about homophobia.  Look at sexual assault/rape stats.  Reported and estimated.  Ask a woman in your life how many times she is accosted on the streets or feels threatened and then told it's her fault.  It's not just a word in a vacuum, it's a constant assault and you're part of it.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: [ptx] on March 27, 2013, 05:43:13 pm
What does any of that got to do with the chat of a freaking game, where you play as some anonymous medieval cannonfodder?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 05:43:46 pm
It's also worth considering that these groups are minorities everywhere on the internet. I promise you, being supremely strict on "offensive" language will not bring diversity to cRPG. The only thing it will do is drive existing players away. Sure, you consider that a good thing since those players are obvious "bigots" since they choose to use language interpreted by some as a slur.

The only girl I've ever heard directly insulted was Winterly, which was very sad yeah. She was all like "here!" during rollcall for a battle and people were like "LOL IS THAT A 12 YEAR OLD BOY?"

Yeah, that's fucked up. Winterly was really nice to everyone, a good player, and I enjoyed her company. Really good battle-buddy to have. I've been playing for a good amount of time, and being a gigantic nerd, I play a LOT. EVERYONE is called "whore, slut, etc". If those insults were reserved for women, that'd be one thing. They're simply general insults to the vast population.

You've got to understand that the reality is not that women, homosexuals, transexuals, or whatever alienated minority group are not driven away because certain words are used in-game. I wish that were the case, because then you'd be rightfully crusading. I love playing with all sorts. It's interesting to hear different viewpoints on all kinds of shit that I wouldn't normally hear. However, member of those minority groups simply NEVER SET FOOT IN THIS GAME.

The fact is, those minority groups simply do not play online video games in the numbers that white male nerds do. There's very little that we can do about it. They're simply uninterested.

You don't think maybe more people would've stuck around if they didn't find it to be a hostile or distasteful environment?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 05:45:02 pm
You don't think maybe more people would've stuck around if they didn't find it to be a hostile or distasteful environment?

Welcome to the internet. If anything its worse in other games.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 05:46:03 pm
You don't think maybe more people would've stuck around if they didn't find it to be a hostile or distasteful environment?

We were running 3k unique CD keys back under Ecko's running of servers. So I would disagree with that. People leave because they don't find the game fun because there's 10k other games released to play, or it's to hard. Dealing with people in game is probably the lowest reason to quit.

This isn't IRL, that's a reason for quitting in real life jobs not often for ones in games.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 27, 2013, 05:48:57 pm
Hmm, I've got mixed feelings about this because cRPG has always been a safe place for these people to be themselves.

Every day they walk around in public keeping their true selves private from friends, family, coworkers and even girlfriends in a few cases because they know society generally looks down on homophobic/racist speech.  So many times during the day they probably want to casually use the n-word or call someone a "bundle of sticks" but can't without risking losing their job or being ostracized by their classmates.  Then they get home at night, pour a glass of chard and transport themselves to a fabulous medieval world where they can "come out of the closet" so to speak and chat with guys who are just like them.

It's too bad Gorath doesn't play cRPG anymore because it'd be interesting to hear his opinion on this subject.  He was an outspoken advocate of gay chat rights in medieval combat simulators and was frequently muted by the powers that be because of this.

Those poor racists and homophobes, how they have to keep in the closet because of "society"!

Won't someone think of them?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 05:51:17 pm
You seriously don't understand the difference between "I don't mean it when I say it" and a person who could have been bullied their entire life for it and may have had one or several traumatic experiences because of it.  If only there was a word for that (it's "privilege)".  And I'm not just talking about homophobia.  Look at sexual assault/rape stats.  Reported and estimated.  Ask a woman in your life how many times she is accosted on the streets or feels threatened and then told it's her fault.  It's not just a word in a vacuum, it's a constant assault and you're part of it.

I was considering writing a made-up story about this, but I decided it was too sinister.

Say I was called a nerd all throughout my public schooling. Say kids larger and more numerous than I pushed my head into the toilet while chanting NERD NERD NERD. Say I was bullied my ENTIRE public school career because I was a nerd. Shall we then punish people that say the word "nerd" because it brings up horrific memories and traumatises me?

Any noun or adjective can be used as an insult with proper context. Should we then censor all chat that could harm someone's feelings?
Shall we ban people that say "wow you're bad" because videogames are very important to someone and being called bad makes them feel like doo-doo?

Shall we ban people that use curse words because someone was raised in a very strict environment and experiences anxiety and negative emotion upon seeing certain four-letter words?

It's entirely unfair to take administrative action against someone for saying something that could be construed as offensive to a group of people, and refuse to take action for saying something that could be interpreted as offensive to a different group of people.

(click to show/hide)


You don't think maybe more people would've stuck around if they didn't find it to be a hostile or distasteful environment?

And no, I do not think that. This is NOT a hostile or distasteful environment. The only people I've ever seen claim offense to things that are said are

a) people complaining falsely in order to see some blood and get someone banned
b) people complaining about cute puppies and (oddly enough) Negga's name

I have never had access to "i" chat, so I don't know if people have been making complaints in private, but I cannot bring myself to think that there are people that are frightened to speak out over the internet, and I'm a pseudo-science (read; psychology) major. I know a thing or two about anxiety n' shit.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 27, 2013, 05:54:45 pm
I think most people have tough skin on the internet, what other people say has less meaning because you don't know them, and aren't face to face.   My daddy always taught me that you need to "consider the source".  If someone you don't know, or don't respect is talking shit to you, "consider the source".  Words have no power over you unless you let them. 

That being said, I do think when people are going out of their way to be belligerent or going on ad nauseum to try and piss someone off, it looks bad on the game to someone who's just started playing within the last day or two, and things like that can certainly turn people off to a new MP game.

I think it's enough to warn people, mute them, and give 24 hour bans if they can't play nice.  I think this pretty much falls under common sense of what should or should not be allowed, I don't think a strict "word list" is the way to go, just some human interpretation is good enough.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 05:55:23 pm
The only girl I've ever heard directly insulted was Winterly, which was very sad yeah. She was all like "here!" during rollcall for a battle and people were like "LOL IS THAT A 12 YEAR OLD BOY?"

Yeah, that's fucked up. Winterly was really nice to everyone, a good player, and I enjoyed her company. Really good battle-buddy to have. I've been playing for a good amount of time, and being a gigantic nerd, I play a LOT. EVERYONE is called "whore, slut, etc". If those insults were reserved for women, that'd be one thing. They're simply general insults to the vast population.


I also just want to say it's easy to miss something that has been normalized that doesn't directly affect you, and I think you weren't here for the time nude pictures of a player were leaked.   The reaction of everyone was absolutely disgusting.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 05:56:54 pm
I think most people have tough skin on the internet, what other people say has less meaning because you don't know them, and aren't face to face.   My daddy always taught me that you need to "consider the source".  If someone you don't know, or don't respect is talking shit to you, "consider the source".  Words have no power over you unless you let them. 

That being said, I do think when people are going out of their way to be belligerent or going on ad nauseum to try and piss someone off, it looks bad on the game to someone who's just started playing within the last day or two, and things like that can certainly turn people off to a new MP game.

Huseby does make some good posts every now and again.

I do not defend people that use language considered offensive with the intent to evoke negative emotions in others. I also do not defend people that simply curse or use offensive language ad nauseum, seemingly to prove that they are able to.

I do defend people that use that language in order to evoke positive emotions in others, namely their friends.

It's not difficult to tell the two apart.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Knute on March 27, 2013, 05:57:49 pm
We were running 3k unique CD keys back under Ecko's running of servers. So I would disagree with that. People leave because they don't find the game fun because there's 10k other games released to play, or it's to hard. Dealing with people in game is probably the lowest reason to quit.

This isn't IRL, that's a reason for quitting in real life jobs not often for ones in games.

I don't know, there were probably quite a few people who initially tried crpg but were turned off by the unregulated chat going on.  Back in the fall 2010, weeknights on the NA community servers were pretty bad.

Edit: I remember shutting down the game a few times then taking a long break just because it was the same thing every night, so I can imagine others were doing the same.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 05:58:34 pm
Say I was called a nerd all throughout my public schooling. Say kids larger and more numerous than I pushed my head into the toilet while chanting NERD NERD NERD. Say I was bullied my ENTIRE public school career because I was a nerd. Shall we then punish people that say the word "nerd" because it brings up horrific memories and traumatises me?

No, because only white males (cis scum) are called nerds, and they're a majority and have all the privilege so it's okay. Your analogy is a great example of the hypocrisy that is spawned whenever arguments like these arise.

Where is the line drawn? You can't pick and choose in situations like this without it becoming hypocritical.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 05:59:16 pm
I also just want to say it's easy to miss something that has been normalized that doesn't directly affect you, and I think you weren't here for the time nude pictures of a player were leaked.   The reaction of everyone was absolutely disgusting.

You talking about that classical/smooth blow up?

Never heard about that, but I have heard of some rather shitty "THIS IS YOU IRL" shit.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 06:01:35 pm
You talking about that classical/smooth blow up?

Never heard about that, but I have heard of some rather shitty "THIS IS YOU IRL" shit.

No. He is talking about the Coy/Alkonai blow up.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Shik on March 27, 2013, 06:04:58 pm
No, because only white males (cis scum) are called nerds
This statement and analogy is so fucking stupid I don't even know where to start.

Privilege: the thread
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:05:08 pm
No. He is talking about the Coy/Alkonai blow up.

Oh. Never heard of that and I guess I'm lucky.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 06:08:50 pm
This statement and analogy is so fucking stupid I don't even know where to start.

Privilege: the thread

In other words, you're so enraged at how correct it is that you can't come up with a logical response. That's fine. Nobody ever can.

Let's all just take a moment to remember "you're an idiot" isn't an argument.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 06:10:16 pm
You talking about that classical/smooth blow up?

Never heard about that, but I have heard of some rather shitty "THIS IS YOU IRL" shit.

No. He is talking about the Coy/Alkonai blow up.

I'm not going to name names, but the fact there's a few to choose from says a lot.  I'm talking about a nude image of a female player, where we had everything from people going around to different teamspeaks and spamming the link in chat, to bartering over forum PMs offering ingame items for it.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:11:18 pm
I don't know, there were probably quite a few people who initially tried crpg but were turned off by the unregulated chat going on.  Back in the fall 2010, weeknights on the NA community servers were pretty bad.

I think we had more people leave from Donkleaps's Heavy chat regulation than from chat crazyness/sexisim/etc etc....

I'm not going to name names, but the fact there's a few to choose from says a lot.  I'm talking about a nude image of a female player, where we had everything from people going around to different teamspeaks and spamming the link in chat, to bartering over forum PMs offering ingame items for it.

That's forum related and TS related, not IN GAME related.
It's also a very shitty thing to do but...that's not this discussion.

Now if you could do something like spam pictures over chat....my god, I'd be banning people non stop!
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 06:13:33 pm
This statement and analogy is so fucking stupid I don't even know where to start.

Privilege: the thread

Believe it or not, I will actually admit that I have "white privilege"

I'm a white kid. Someone isn't going to look at me and assume "damn I bet that guy's gonna break into my car while I'm not looking" because I'm black.

They're not going to look at me and assume "damn I bet he works landscaping for under-the-table pay and has 6 kids" because I'm hispanic. (fun fact, I have worked landscaping for under-the-table pay for a while)

I admit and understand this. As much as I am loathe to admit it, white/straight privilege is a real thing; albeit not as all-encompassing and dire as many claim.

I'm gonna tell you guys a story. I've been a nerd on the internet since I was about 10 years old. I played a game called Day of Defeat:Source and was a real turbonerd there, much like here. I played with the same folks for 3 or so years, and the summer I graduated high-school, I drove up to Ohio and hung out with a lot of them. Little did I know, someone who drove from Kansas to hang out as well informed all of them that me and my buddy I drove up with were a gay couple. I didn't figure this out until afterwards, and only then because he directly told me.

Guess what?

I couldn't tell when I was there because nobody treated us any differently. They didn't give a single fuck. These were mostly straight, white males and females.

There isn't some nerd conspiracy in which folks wish to push out those different than them.

Nerd edit: It's really fucking silly to dick-wave over who has more privilege. We're all members of the first-world and thusly ooze privilege from every pore of our body. Arguing over who is privileged or not is like saying "I'm worth more as a human being because I didn't have the fortune to be born as X or Y"

Unless you were born in Sarejevo during intense conflict, grew up in the Sudan in the middle of warlords dick-slapping one another, Eastern Europe while thugs raided your neighbors apartments for anything of value, or some other unfortunate shit-hole, you've got no right to speak of privilege, imo.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 06:14:03 pm
TL;DR:

"But you see, I don't even mean 'homosexual' when I say it, so it's not a bad thing.  No, I'm not going to just say what I actually mean, my right to be intellectually lazy comes before someone else's desire to feel safe in their environment."
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 06:15:05 pm
I think we had more people leave from Donkleaps's Heavy chat regulation than from chat crazyness/sexisim/etc etc....

That's forum related and TS related, not IN GAME related.
It's also a very shitty thing to do but...that's not this discussion.

Now if you could do something like spam pictures over chat....my god, I'd be banning people non stop!

As I am not currently an admin I have never been discussing ingame rules, just my opinions regarding gamer privilege and this community specifically.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Shik on March 27, 2013, 06:15:43 pm
What I was saying that being a "nerd" is somehow exclusive to white people and thus equivalent to racism is the most bold-faced lie I've ever seen.
@aiyasha - fyi, there is an entire race of people that is discriminated against as "bookish" and guess what - its not white people
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:18:56 pm
TL;DR:

"But you see, I don't even mean 'homosexual' when I say it, so it's not a bad thing.  No, I'm not going to just say what I actually mean, my right to be intellectually lazy comes before someone else's desire to feel safe in their environment."

Safe is relative. In all honesty, your are not safe where you live, right now. Or where you work, etc etc. We as humans, assume a false sense of security from the laws and institutions we have put into place. While they might provide general safety, deterrence and other factors, it doesn't guarantee individual safety, but we as humans believe that the cost of the deterrence outweighs the cost to commit an injustice.

It's pretty intersting if you look it up. Security from government(which is what we, as humans, create) isn't true security, but a feeling of security.

IN no way does this have to do with this discussion, but that statement brought it to my head.

As I am not currently an admin I have never been discussing ingame rules, just my opinions regarding gamer privilege and this community specifically.

But that's what this thread is about. IN GAME. As much as we could argue about shit like that here, the vast majority of players only go to the website for gear and character and only play the game. Few come onto forums and get pulled into this shitstorm that's the forums.

What I was saying that being a "nerd" is somehow exclusive to white people and thus equivalent to racism is the most bold-faced lie I've ever seen.
@aiyasha - fyi, there is an entire race of people that is discriminated against as "bookish" and guess what - its not white people

You can say that about any race. I asume you don't live in the sourthern US shik. Come down here sometime, you'll love it for the amount of Derogatory terms you can find for all races.
(and for the record, stereotypes are derogatory which is what you're meaning.)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 06:23:51 pm
What I was saying that being a "nerd" is somehow exclusive to white people and thus equivalent to racism is the most bold-faced lie I've ever seen.

This was never the argument. Partyboy claimed that the words we're discussing were problems because there were people that were traumatized by them as children. Sandersson posted an analogy of someone who was traumatized as a child by being called a nerd (and I don't know how old you are, but I assume old enough to remember when 'nerd' was a bad thing) and yet nobody is getting banned for using a word like that, and the only explanation I can come up with is because it's not used to describe a minority race or an oppressed sexuality.

If somebody would like to throw out an explanation why some words are more fine than others, I'm all ears.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 06:25:08 pm
What I was saying that being a "nerd" is somehow exclusive to white people and thus equivalent to racism is the most bold-faced lie I've ever seen.
@aiyasha - fyi, there is an entire race of people that is discriminated against as "bookish" and guess what - its not white people

I think aiyasha's point is that different words effect people differently. Calling someone a bundle of sticks, nerd, chink, slut, etc. can all have the same effect on different people. If you are going to ban someone for saying one (some) of these things, you should be banning them for all of them.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 06:28:20 pm
Something that would solve the issue with the least headache (although I think it'd be the lamest thing there could be) is either

a) Instead of the "no offensive shit" rule, which is entirely subjective, make a list of banned words. The rules can then be applied evenly between all admins. It's really stupid that I can say "dayum nigga" when certain admins are on, but not others.
b) Make a chat filter, and ban people for evading the chat filter.

Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 27, 2013, 06:28:41 pm
This was never the argument. Partyboy claimed that the words we're discussing were problems because there were people that were traumatized by them as children. Sandersson posted an analogy of someone who was traumatized as a child by being called a nerd (and I don't know how old you are, but I assume old enough to remember when 'nerd' was a bad thing) and yet nobody is getting banned for using a word like that, and the only explanation I can come up with is because it's not used to describe a minority race or an oppressed sexuality.

If somebody would like to throw out an explanation why some words are more fine than others, I'm all ears.

Because  "friend" and "chink" are both racial slurs, created by white people, in order to oppress minority's. The context is important. Why do you even want to use those words anyways, those words have very different meanings and cultural connotations to the Asian/Black community. There is no way that a white person could say those words and not be racist.

And it's the same with "bundle of sticks" and homophobia too.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 06:29:16 pm
This was never the argument. Partyboy claimed that the words we're discussing were problems because there were people that were traumatized by them as children. Sandersson posted an analogy of someone who was traumatized as a child by being called a nerd (and I don't know how old you are, but I assume old enough to remember when 'nerd' was a bad thing) and yet nobody is getting banned for using a word like that, and the only explanation I can come up with is because it's not used to describe a minority race or an oppressed sexuality.

If somebody would like to throw out an explanation why some words are more fine than others, I'm all ears.

While being traumatized as a child is part of it, I was more trying to conjure up an image of a lifetime of assault on one's identity that you could understand.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 06:30:49 pm
Something that would solve the issue with the least headache (although I think it'd be the lamest thing there could be) is either

a) Instead of the "no offensive shit" rule, which is entirely subjective, make a list of banned words. The rules can then be applied evenly between all admins. It's really stupid that I can say "dayum nigga" when certain admins are on, but not others.
b) Make a chat filter, and ban people for evading the chat filter.

Perhaps a general rule of treating others with respect, whether directly or indirectly.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 06:31:47 pm
Because  "friend" and "chink" are both racial slurs, created by white people, in order to oppress minority's. The context is important. Why do you even want to use those words anyways, those words have very different meanings and cultural connotations to the Asian/Black community. There is no way that a white person could say those words and not be racist.

And it's the same with "bundle of sticks" and homophobia too.

friend and chink were not words that were created to be offensive, they were words that took on an offensive connotation over time, and now people have decided that instead of helping society to come to terms with these words actual definitions, we've banned them and thus created resentment.

Unless you're really under the impression that Huckleberry Finn was white propaganda.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Soldier_of_God on March 27, 2013, 06:31:55 pm
if ya'll dont want to be trolled on the internet, go watch cailou or something. i mean, do you really think people read the shit they see in game and their mascara starts running? racism, yeah, should'nt be there.

The word my old friend is an ambiguous term. calling someone a my old friend really is an expression of feeling cheated by someone, and therefore calling them a cheat, specifically that they cheated you with less than applaudable behavior. same as saying something is gay. I sincerely believe that 99% of the time, this word or related words are not used to denounce someones sexual orientation, and if it were, im sure 99% of the time it would be reported to an admin, and 99% of the time those 1% would be muted or banned and punished accordingly.

for instance, in battle, Hospitaller_Jeff_of_Canada called someone a my old friend, not to long before this post.  insta-muted for a 2 word sentence. no warning, no trial, just Judge, Jury and Executioner guillotines falling down on a otherwise normal person.

case in point: an admins job is to promote order, rule following, and insure everyone enjoys the game, not to filter language. if that language offends, it is then the admin's job to stop the "offensive" behavior. language is only offensive if it is seen as such.

to play devil's advocate, i could say "well, n-word isnt bad, because people use it all the time in jest, or greeting." tell me, how often does anyone call someone a n word as a term of affection, other than someone who is black? never.

how often is my old friend used by someone who isnt gay as a term of... well as a jocular term? all the time. people say things are gay all the time.

so if you're appalled at my lack of respect for the lgbt community, its time to go watch some fucking cailou you my old friend.
*note: no homophobic reference intended.

p.s. my aunt was a lesbian. she used/uses the term all the time in a non-discriminatory manner



Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 06:33:34 pm
Perhaps a general rule of treating others with respect, whether directly or indirectly.
no, No, NO.

The intent of that statement was to provide a concrete, objective rule to follow.

There is no way to correctly tell every time whether someone is respecting another.

There is a way to tell whether someone said a banned word or not.

See, I don't give that many fucks about the actual ability to say shit or not. The only thing that upsets me is I can't say "dayum nigga" or "sup nigga" or whatever. Doesn't upset me that much.

What upsets me is the fact that the rules are subjective and each admin can apply them differently. If you're attempting to create an atmosphere in which nobody's feelings can be hurt, you must make a concrete, unchangeable list of things you can and cannot do.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:36:03 pm
Some Racist terms for "whites"
(click to show/hide)

Theres probably a few others out there but you get the point. There's no such thing as a "Clean" race. Every race has a term for every other race.

There should be a public list(like mine) on words that are not allowed regardless of context. So that we can then argue not about the intent to ban but about what should and should not be on that list.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 27, 2013, 06:38:39 pm

The word "my old friend" is a derogatory term to LGBT people and it has been expanded to be a general insult, do you not see how that is extremely disrespectful and offensive?

You don't go call people "friend" instead of "asshole" and then say it's ambiguous and you didn't mean offense to black people do you? Although I wouldn't altogether surprised if you or other people in this thread did considering your opinions.
My last post in this awful straight white male privilege thread, but please try educating yourselves on these issues before posting about how things aren't offensive. They only aren't offensive to you because you don't have to deal with these things.


anders: you don't get discriminated against in the same way for being a "yankee" it's not the same at all, but a list of the real offensive words would probably sit better than a "respect people" rule, given this community doesn't understand that.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 06:40:07 pm
I think aiyasha's point is that different words effect people differently. Calling someone a bundle of sticks, nerd, chink, slut, etc. can all have the same effect on different people. If you are going to ban someone for saying one (some) of these things, you should be banning them for all of them.

Thank you, exactly. Hence my earlier question of "where do we draw the line, and why is it okay to draw the line there?"
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 06:42:17 pm
My last post in this awful straight white male privilege thread, but please try educating yourselves on these issues before posting about how things aren't offensive. They only aren't offensive to you because you don't have to deal with these things.

Basing your argument off assumptions won't win you any points, especially if you're going to pull the 'white straight male' card. It's not an argument, it's a cop-out for why it's okay to speak derogatory terms towards white people but it's wrong to do it to anyone else.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:45:23 pm
anders: you don't get discriminated against in the same way for being a "yankee" it's not the same at all, but a list of the real offensive words would probably sit better than a "respect people" rule, given this community doesn't not understand that.

Yes, And some americans take being a "Yankee" with pride.
I mean, in just the southern US you got:
Redneck, hick, and trailer trash(This can be more, but is refrenced to whites), as derogatory terms.

So, it would be best to have a list over an ambigous respect rule, at least for NA servers. We all, for the most part, read, write and speak English, unlike the EU servers, and we thus understand each other more. So A list of offensive words would probably be better and easier to maintain and enforce over a more ambiguous rule. That rule should stay for EU as they are Multi-lingual, but for NA, we should.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Canuck on March 27, 2013, 06:47:48 pm
Sandersson's selectable chat filter would be the best bet here in my opinion. Make a big list of all the words the devs and admin team don't want being said, and make it an option for people to have them filtered out in game. It isn't a perfect solution, but at the least it is fair and consistent.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:49:39 pm
Sandersson's selectable chat filter would be the best bet here in my opinion. Make a big list of all the words the devs and admin team don't want being said, and make it an option to have them filtered out in game. It isn't a perfect solution, but at the least it is fair and consistent.

Ever since I saw that Suggestion, I've actually been in agreement over it. I mean, we got words that we can all pick and easily add to the list. As Time goes on, we can also add more to list(like words that bypass filters such as F@gg0t or fgg0t, etc)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 06:53:06 pm
Sandersson's selectable chat filter would be the best bet here in my opinion. Make a big list of all the words the devs and admin team don't want being said, and make it an option for people to have them filtered out in game. It isn't a perfect solution, but at the least it is fair and consistent.

This guy took me mediocre suggestion and made it a lot better.

I respect people's desire to play the game without fear of becoming upset at what they consider to be offensive; but I do not appreciate people's ability to have fun with their friends to suffer because of it.

Many multiplayer games have a chat filter that is optional. Put that shit in, yo. Hell, put in a feature that automatically LOCALLY mutes players that say forbidden words. I'm sure folks that would enable the feature wouldn't want to hear anything from someone they consider to be a bigot anyway.

No more posts from me, I'm actually feeling a lot of nerd-shame at posting so gat-dang much in this thread.

The most important thing that should be gathered from this thread is this:

OP, you're an absolute disgrace for having the name that you do. Downright shameful.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 06:54:32 pm
Some Racist terms for "whites"

I'm really surprised this didn't happen earlier in the discussion.  I'm out for now, only so much I can handle.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 06:57:45 pm
I'm really surprised this didn't happen earlier in the discussion.  I'm out for now, only so much I can handle.

?

Are you saying that there's no racist terms for whites? The Point I'm making is(in that post), that there's no clean race, and you should make a list of words(like that) to be blocked or muted or banned or w/e for the game. No more of this Pussyfooting around and it's not offensive to me, context is important BS.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Knute on March 27, 2013, 06:58:57 pm
I think we had more people leave from Donkleaps's Heavy chat regulation than from chat crazyness/sexisim/etc etc....


I can't remember when he took over but I think that was closer to when NA finally got an official server. 

With multiplayer games, especially free ones, first impressions are really important because you generally see the largest populations at first and then they generally drop off over time because there's so many games out there.  My first impression with this one was a fun medieval combat game unlike anything else out there....but you had to sit through the racist/homophobic chat to play it.

This is a free mod so it's up to the developers to do whatever they want but if there was a situation where money was on the line it'd be best to create an in-game environment that's not going to turn away potential long-term subscribers.  If a game is really good I can't imagine anyone saying, "Aw, fuck this golly, I can't call muh buddies bundles of sticks?  Der taking away muh rights, I'm not playing this!".

Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Ganner on March 27, 2013, 07:04:30 pm
wait wait, lets get back on topic...

NA ADMINS BADMIN GRRRRR RAWR /GNASH TEETH
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Lt_Anders on March 27, 2013, 07:05:00 pm
Yea, but Donkle went heavy handed on more than just hitting words like friend. He went towards plain old curse words to, such as fuck and shit as well as names of people.(and some not even offensive names!)

But that's a different story.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 07:08:36 pm
Yea, but Donkle went heavy handed on more than just hitting words like friend. He went towards plain old curse words to, such as fuck and shit as well as names of people.(and some not even offensive names!)

But that's a different story.

Yes, he tried to make it a christian server. Even banned a guy for having the name "pike bastard". Despite there being weapons in the game such as the bastard sword and heavy bastard sword.

But yes, it was right around the time that the official server had popped up. However, donkleaps rules pushed a lot of players to the other server.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 07:11:11 pm
wait wait, lets get back on topic...

NA ADMINS BADMIN GRRRRR RAWR /GNASH TEETH

And here I thought you guys would be happy that the discussion had turned away from "admins power caboose" and towards "is this new stricter rule enforcement justified?"
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 27, 2013, 07:12:45 pm
wait wait, lets get back on topic...

NA ADMINS BADMIN GRRRRR RAWR /GNASH TEETH

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


To your lips, and beyond!
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: MrShine on March 27, 2013, 07:25:05 pm
Here instead of focusing on what we can't say, let's focus on what we can say to replace the void that is apparently left in everyone's vocabulary.

MrShine's List of Approved c-RPG Insults

So next time a slur is at your fingertips, why not replace it with one of MrShine's List of Approved c-RPG Insults?  Your worries of being muted or banned will simply melt away!
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Turboflex on March 27, 2013, 07:28:57 pm
Shakespeare Insult Kit

To create a Shakespearean insult...
  Combine one word from each of the three columns below,
  prefaced with "Thou":
Code: [Select]
        Column 1            Column 2                Column 3

        artless             base-court              apple-john
        bawdy               bat-fowling             baggage
        beslubbering        beef-witted             barnacle
        bootless            beetle-headed           bladder
        churlish            boil-brained            boar-pig
        cockered            clapper-clawed          bugbear
        clouted             clay-brained            bum-bailey
        craven              common-kissing          canker-blossom
        currish             crook-pated             clack-dish
        dankish             dismal-dreaming         clotpole
        dissembling         dizzy-eyed              coxcomb
        droning             doghearted              codpiece
        errant              dread-bolted            death-token
        fawning             earth-vexing            dewberry
        fobbing             elf-skinned             flap-dragon
        froward             fat-kidneyed            flax-wench
        frothy              fen-sucked              flirt-gill
        gleeking            flap-mouthed            foot-licker
        goatish             fly-bitten              fustilarian
        gorbellied          folly-fallen            giglet
        impertinent         fool-born               gudgeon
        infectious          full-gorged             haggard
        jarring             guts-griping            harpy
        loggerheaded        half-faced              hedge-pig
        lumpish             hasty-witted            horn-beast
        mammering           hedge-born              hugger-mugger
        mangled             hell-hated              joithead
        mewling             idle-headed             lewdster
        paunchy             ill-breeding            lout
        pribbling           ill-nurtured            maggot-pie
        puking              knotty-pated            malt-worm
        puny                milk-livered            mammet
        qualling            motley-minded           measle
        rank                onion-eyed              minnow
        reeky               plume-plucked           miscreant
        roguish             pottle-deep             moldwarp
        ruttish             pox-marked              mumble-news
        saucy               reeling-ripe            nut-hook
        spleeny             rough-hewn              pigeon-egg
        spongy              rude-growing            pignut
        surly               rump-fed                puttock
        tottering           shard-borne             pumpion
        unmuzzled           sheep-biting            ratsbane
        vain                spur-galled             scut
        venomed             swag-bellied            skainsmate
        villainous          tardy-gaited            strumpet
        warped              tickle-brained          varlot
        wayward             toad-spotted            vassal
        weedy               unchin-snouted          whey-face
        yeasty              weather-bitten          wagtail
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 07:30:38 pm
Here instead of focusing on what we can't say, let's focus on what we can say to replace the void that is apparently left in everyone's vocabulary.

I think peoples problems, is that something that may not be offensive to some are to others. So you don't know what you can and can't say. For example, as I mentioned earlier, Donkleaps was banning people for having the word bastard in their names. Which is on your list of acceptable insults.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Hobb on March 27, 2013, 07:34:39 pm
Has anyone ever wondered why you can count the number of openly female or gay players on NA with both hands and still have enough fingers left over to plug your ears and say, "na na na na"?  Because suggesting someone is homosexual is considered to be the most insulting thing you can say to someone on here and if you're a woman then you deal with being called a whore and worse, specifically because you're a woman, when you kill someone just because you outplay them.  Either that or you're a fake gamer girl who can't play games.  And that's from the general population and not the individuals that constantly creep on and

As a proud clan leader of the OP, flamboyant gays, wannabe pedaphiles, certified Bronies, dirty french canadians, too-many-asians, and so-chill black guys, we have, and never will enforce TeamSpeak censorship and everything works just fine.

Another master troll thread from Yoloswaggins_of_TKoV
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 27, 2013, 07:34:42 pm
Thou unmuzzled motley-minded louts can get out
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Berserkadin on March 27, 2013, 07:39:42 pm
Or you just stop searching for possibilites to get insulted by random people on the internet and just ignore it. Focus on the positive stuff in your life instead and just let it pass by as the wind. Aslong as it doesnt escalate into a hurricane.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Tydeus on March 27, 2013, 07:47:00 pm
Yes, let's create an arbitrary list of words that are a no-no because we're incapable of inferring context(using common sense). This entire thread is absurd. Here's the fucking bottom line: Your derogatory insults have more weight than what you think, whether they're racial slurs or simple insults that target a specific attribute of fellow human beings.

It's rarely ever going to be the case that you can find an insult that someone, somewhere, hasn't been ridiculed with throughout their life, and are thus more sensitive to the term. Race, creed, gender, etc, doesn't matter. If we're going to enter into this discussion and actually try to fix the problem, then we need to actually fix the problem. That is, we as a community do the intellectually honest thing, and we deem all derogatory, hateful statements, as being 'wrong'.

Alas, I don't think this community is up for the task. Few communities on earth would be able to, as a whole, practice complete understanding and respect for one another. But any alternative to this, will either be hypocritical or intellectually dishonest in its implementation.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 07:49:09 pm
Yes, let's create an arbitrary list of words that are a no-no because we're incapable of inferring context(using common sense). This entire thread is absurd. Here's the fucking bottom line: Your derogatory insults have more weight than what you think, whether they're racial slurs or simple insults that target a specific attribute of fellow human beings.

It's rarely ever going to be the case that you can find an insult that someone, somewhere, hasn't been ridiculed with throughout their life, and are thus more sensitive to the term. Race, creed, gender, etc, doesn't matter. If we're going to enter into this discussion and actually try to fix the problem, then we need to actually fix the problem. That is, we as a community do the intellectually honest thing, and we deem all derogatory, hateful statements, as being 'wrong'.

Alas, I don't think this community is up for the task. Few communities on earth would be able to, as a whole, practice complete understanding and respect for one another. But any alternative to this, will either be hypocritical or intellectually dishonest in its implementation.
I'm going to have to disagree here. It's the internet. Grow a pair.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: dynamike on March 27, 2013, 07:53:02 pm
Simple solution:

Unban Farmer Nate and SpookIsland and use them to set the bar in terms of insults. Anyone that manages to be more offensive than them gets the ban-hammer.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Tydeus on March 27, 2013, 07:55:26 pm
I'm going to have to disagree here. It's the internet. Grow a pair.
Good argument, refuted my everything. I am fail and bow to your reason and logic. You are the superior human being that clearly has a better idea of how best to promote human well-being.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 07:56:44 pm
Excuse me sir your sig is offensive. It makes me feel unconformable is my phallic area. Can you please remove it. "chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character" 
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Tydeus on March 27, 2013, 08:12:18 pm
Excuse me sir your sig is offensive. It makes me feel unconformable is my phallic area. Can you please remove it. "chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character"
You missed my point entirely. Congrats.

I simply stated what the mature and honest approach would be. I specifically stated that it probably shouldn't even be attempted with crpg. It's a completely idealistic and unreasonable concept, nevertheless, it is the best possible course of action. I'm saying we either do the mature, intellectually honest thing, or we continue with business as usual, maybe being a bit more proactive in our approach to negative terms. But anything in between is simply hypocritical and dishonest.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 08:13:33 pm
Well apparently I did. yea maintain the course
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 08:17:27 pm
It would be nice if people would think about what they just typed before they hit the enter key. Crpg is a pretty tight knit community, so you would think that people would be more considerate the others feelings. But hey, it is the internet, so that may be asking too much.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 08:19:48 pm
Simple solution:

Unban Farmer Nate and SpookIsland and use them to set the bar in terms of insults. Anyone that manages to be more offensive than them gets the ban-hammer.

As one of the leaders of Groovy Ghoulies, I agree.

FREE SPOOK!
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 27, 2013, 08:26:13 pm
It would be nice if people would think about what they just typed before they hit the enter key. Crpg is a pretty tight knit community, so you would think that people would be more considerate the others feelings. But hey, it is the internet, so that may be asking too much.

Well I've had people tell me they think I'm a dick from what I type in the cRPG battle server, and I literally never say anything "mean", if something comes across as me being a dick, it's usually sarcasm not translating to text
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kafein on March 27, 2013, 08:27:33 pm
You know, you could always go and learn for yourself what is discriminatory and what is not.  There is no shortage of first hand accounts of the effects of bigotry.  Although, I will warn you, realizing you've been in the wrong all your life is an uncomfortable feeling and it's a lot easier to just go on doing it than admit it.

Education should be sought out and not forced upon, but here we are anyways.

Your subtlety detector is broken. Just forget the second line.

Yeah it is pretty offensive to have a derogative term for a group of people claimed as a general term for anything bad or annoying. How is it any different than calling someone a "nigcher" or some such? It's not and if you don't find that offensive either then you don't deserve the right to talk about this stuff.

And if anything, it's worse on EU since you guys all think you're so further ahead than americans when in reality you're just as bad.

"wolves_skono_the_my old friend" and other wonderful things.

"I find boys bands offensive", to steal the work of someone. It is in fact very easy to make the difference between hate speech and liberal use of words, even over the internet. Also, I talk about this stuff if I want to.


Example : Skono is not homophobic because he said "my old friend".
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: dynamike on March 27, 2013, 08:48:52 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


visitors can't see pics , please register or login



(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: WeeBo on March 27, 2013, 08:49:56 pm
Jesus Mike get a hold of yourself!  :shock:
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kafein on March 27, 2013, 09:03:07 pm
Yes, let's create an arbitrary list of words that are a no-no because we're incapable of inferring context(using common sense). This entire thread is absurd. Here's the fucking bottom line: Your derogatory insults have more weight than what you think, whether they're racial slurs or simple insults that target a specific attribute of fellow human beings.

It's rarely ever going to be the case that you can find an insult that someone, somewhere, hasn't been ridiculed with throughout their life, and are thus more sensitive to the term. Race, creed, gender, etc, doesn't matter. If we're going to enter into this discussion and actually try to fix the problem, then we need to actually fix the problem. That is, we as a community do the intellectually honest thing, and we deem all derogatory, hateful statements, as being 'wrong'.

Alas, I don't think this community is up for the task. Few communities on earth would be able to, as a whole, practice complete understanding and respect for one another. But any alternative to this, will either be hypocritical or intellectually dishonest in its implementation.

Great reasoning, then you somehow end up with a conclusion which resemble the opposite of what would be deduced by your premisses. It is precisely because drawing a clear line is impossible that no such thing as banning "all" curse words is possible.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Turboflex on March 27, 2013, 09:06:05 pm
Not enough rainbows, Dynamike!!!
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 27, 2013, 09:10:06 pm
They have signs in a lot of the establishments in NOLA such as:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


I thought it was pretty cool
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 27, 2013, 09:31:15 pm
They have signs in a lot of the establishments in NOLA such as:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


I thought it was pretty cool

Funny, here in new york all the signs say shut the fuck up cunt.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Penitent on March 27, 2013, 09:46:14 pm
FREE SPOOK
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 09:58:40 pm
You guys are safe from the tyranny, you know.  The devs will never allow this to be enforced.  Which is weird, I can't imagine why none of them would be concerned with the interests of people of colour, women, or the LGBTQ community.  No idea at all.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kaoklai on March 27, 2013, 10:31:27 pm
I don't care about this issue either way; I just think it's hilarious that some people in this thread seem to actually think that banning or muting people for saying words like "fàggot" or "nìgger" is nerd oppression or something. 
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 27, 2013, 10:36:58 pm
You guys are safe from the tyranny, you know.  The devs will never allow this to be enforced.  Which is weird, I can't imagine why none of them would be concerned with the interests of people of colour, women, or the LGBTQ community.  No idea at all.

WHITE PRIVILEGE CIS SCUM
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 27, 2013, 10:37:10 pm
Here is a rambling, most likely incoherent rant. It'll probably come off as an attack, but I don't mean it that way.

You guys aren't some freedom fighting revolutionaries making the world a better place for minorities, you're a group of nerds who don't want people to be called names on the internet by strangers. Toughen up. There isn't some big epidemic of people being completely awful to eachother on this mod, and if someone wants to vent their frustrations by calling someone else a bundle of sticks, its not a slur against homosexuals, its questioning the sexuality of another to verbalize their frustrations with said person.

I don't feel offended at all when someone calls me a bundle of sticks on this game. I got a lot worse shit in high school, where my best friend was a homosexual. The new wave of political correctness is paving the way for a very very dull, close minded world. Perhaps in a few years, we could just keep our kids inside and home school them, protect them from the big bad world and anyone who might disagree with their world view.

I really hate to advocate hate speech, but I'd really hate for it to disappear.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 10:45:50 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cdd78-IF9A&feature=player_detailpage#t=33s
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Joker86 on March 27, 2013, 10:48:06 pm
Why do black people cry during sex?
(click to show/hide)

A girl is flirting at a bar and says "Tell me it's true what they say about black guys"
(click to show/hide)

What is long and hard on a black man?
(click to show/hide)

What do you call five black guys on a stage?
(click to show/hide)

whats the most confusing day in harlem?
(click to show/hide)

Whats the difference between blacks and snow tires?
(click to show/hide)

What's the difference between a naked white woman and a naked black woman?
(click to show/hide)

The other day, I was walking downtown and I saw a friend walk past with a giant TV. And I thought, "funny, that one looks just like mine..."
So I called the wife and thankfully...
(click to show/hide)

How does a black girl know she's pregnant?
(click to show/hide)

Why can't Stevie Wonder read?
(click to show/hide)

Whats a word the begins with N, ends in R and you never want to a call a black person?
(click to show/hide)


What do blacks and bicycles have in common?
(click to show/hide)

A white boy, jimmy, and a black boy, jamal, are in the same kindergarten class. One day the teacher asks them to recite the alphabet. Jimmy goes first and gets through it perfectly. Jamal goes next, gets to h, stumbles and can't finish. That night, Jamal asks his mom why jimmy could recite the abc's and he couldn't. His mom responds with "that's because jimmy is white and you are black." The next day, the teacher asks them to count to 10. Jimmy again goes first and gets through it perfectly. Jamal goes second, gets to 4, stumbles and can't finish. That night, Jamal asks his mom why jimmy could count to 10 and he couldn't. His moms response was the same, " because he is white and you are black." The next day, while in the bathroom, Jamal catches a glimpse of Jimmy's penis. That night he asks his mother, "today I was in the bathroom and saw Jimmy's penis and mine was much bigger than his. Is that because I'm black and he's white?" Jamal's mother responds with, "no Jamal, that's because you are 18 and he is 5."
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Penitent on March 27, 2013, 10:50:14 pm
LOL that last one cracked me up.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 27, 2013, 10:53:29 pm
I would defend your right to crusade against and belittle people you find offensive, but I would still think its dumb and close minded.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 11:02:33 pm
I think it's pretty close minded when people can't identify with any feelings other than their own, tbh.  But that's kind of privilege in a nutshell, when the person in question doesn't have to worry about things other people have to.  I mean, either that's the case, or the person just doesn't care.  But that's when it crosses the line to being a sociopath.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 27, 2013, 11:09:09 pm
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say calling someone a bundle of sticks doesn't mean they are legitimate homophobes. It also doesn't mean they lack empathy or caring. It doesn't mean they are a faceless, internet sociopath. Also hate could come from any societal background.You shouldn't make such assumptions about people.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2013, 11:09:44 pm
Honestly who's idea was it to change the admin team to Morality Police and make the c in cRPG stand for Christian Gaming?

Its a shit idea.  If the devs have legitimate concerns about the "accessiblity" of their game then they can make a word filter.  One that would probably have to cover half the turkish, russian, italian, etc languages to actually stop the inter-national trolling that cracks me up.  And hasn't been addressed by anyone in this thread.  Because of a white guilt/homophobia fixation in conversation?  Ignoring all forms of insulting or rage that aren't presented here but appear to be bannable offenses from a videogame, in order to Follow the Narrative here of out of touch american white racists getting it wrong.

Its a competitive game.  Like playing soccer.   You call people bitches, bundle of stickss, stuff like that on actual sports fields all the time because of adrenaline, as a fan or player.  BADPLAYER who sounds like the number one ignorant ideologue here, like 12 year old "amateur sociologist' who read a few reddit posts about Why Racism Exists.  I've seen him go off on people being bundle of stickss or friends in literally every Dota game he's ever played.  Usually while griefing the team and being bad.  WAY worse then any cRPG stuff people do in that game.  Yet somehow Dota/HoN/LoL is still insanely popular, and the worst people are usually punished on a select basis after player reports.

If admins start casually banning players for dropping "bundle of sticks" in a video game chat though, you will literally be losing 50-100 times more players within a month then you'd ever gain.  That is when christian gaming servers pop up when a mod is already super unpopular and small, and either you get a few insane roleplaying spergs left to run and manage the one server with people trying to grin teeth and bear with it, or much more typically the game is uninstalled.

Basically who gives a shit lol etc, but the community is small and the game unpopular because it has no advertising and its not that good, and having admins of Tears of Destiny level involvement in the game absolutely kills a community faster then anything and is just a bad way to run a gaming community.  Bad for players, bad for business, bad for common sense, and its even bad for the Advancement of Social Acceptance of Progressive Values, if that's the argument.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Tydeus on March 27, 2013, 11:18:35 pm
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say calling someone a bundle of sticks doesn't mean they are legitimate homophobes. It also doesn't mean they lack empathy or caring. It doesn't mean they are a faceless, internet sociopath. Also hate could come from any societal background.You shouldn't make such assumptions about people.
Indeed, but it does mean they're being irresponsible with their speech, and inconsiderate of others feelings. Of course you can just say "toughen up", but that doesn't make you any less inconsiderate.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 11:20:06 pm
Honestly who's idea was it to change the admin team to Morality Police and make the c in cRPG stand for Christian Gaming?

Its a shit idea.  If the devs have legitimate concerns about the "accessiblity" of their game then they can make a word filter.  One that would probably have to cover half the turkish, russian, italian, etc languages to actually stop the inter-national trolling that cracks me up.  And hasn't been addressed by anyone in this thread.  Because of a white guilt/homophobia fixation in conversation?  Ignoring all forms of insulting or rage that aren't presented here but appear to be bannable offenses from a videogame, in order to Follow the Narrative here of out of touch american white racists getting it wrong.

Its a competitive game.  Like playing soccer.   You call people bitches, bundle of stickss, stuff like that on actual sports fields all the time because of adrenaline, as a fan or player.  BADPLAYER who sounds like the number one ignorant ideologue here, like 12 year old "amateur sociologist' who read a few reddit posts about Why Racism Exists.  I've seen him go off on people being bundle of stickss or friends in literally every Dota game he's ever played.  Usually while griefing the team and being bad.  WAY worse then any cRPG stuff people do in that game.  Yet somehow Dota/HoN/LoL is still insanely popular, and the worst people are usually punished on a select basis after player reports.

If admins start casually banning players for dropping "bundle of sticks" in a video game chat though, you will literally be losing 50-100 times more players within a month then you'd ever gain.  That is when christian gaming servers pop up when a mod is already super unpopular and small, and either you get a few insane roleplaying spergs left to run and manage the one server with people trying to grin teeth and bear with it, or much more typically the game is uninstalled.

Basically who gives a shit lol etc, but the community is small and the game unpopular because it has no advertising and its not that good, and having admins of Tears of Destiny level involvement in the game absolutely kills a community faster then anything and is just a bad way to run a gaming community.  Bad for players, bad for business, bad for common sense, and its even bad for the Advancement of Social Acceptance of Progressive Values, if that's the argument.
my nigga, QFT
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 27, 2013, 11:24:33 pm
Honestly who's idea was it to change the admin team to Morality Police and make the c in cRPG stand for Christian Gaming?

Its a shit idea.  If the devs have legitimate concerns about the "accessiblity" of their game then they can make a word filter.  One that would probably have to cover half the turkish, russian, italian, etc languages to actually stop the inter-national trolling that cracks me up.  And hasn't been addressed by anyone in this thread.  Because of a white guilt/homophobia fixation in conversation?  Ignoring all forms of insulting or rage that aren't presented here but appear to be bannable offenses from a videogame, in order to Follow the Narrative here of out of touch american white racists getting it wrong.

Its a competitive game.  Like playing soccer.   You call people bitches, bundle of stickss, stuff like that on actual sports fields all the time because of adrenaline, as a fan or player.  BADPLAYER who sounds like the number one ignorant ideologue here, like 12 year old "amateur sociologist' who read a few reddit posts about Why Racism Exists.  I've seen him go off on people being bundle of stickss or friends in literally every Dota game he's ever played.  Usually while griefing the team and being bad.  WAY worse then any cRPG stuff people do in that game.  Yet somehow Dota/HoN/LoL is still insanely popular, and the worst people are usually punished on a select basis after player reports.

If admins start casually banning players for dropping "bundle of sticks" in a video game chat though, you will literally be losing 50-100 times more players within a month then you'd ever gain.  That is when christian gaming servers pop up when a mod is already super unpopular and small, and either you get a few insane roleplaying spergs left to run and manage the one server with people trying to grin teeth and bear with it, or much more typically the game is uninstalled.

Basically who gives a shit lol etc, but the community is small and the game unpopular because it has no advertising and its not that good, and having admins of Tears of Destiny level involvement in the game absolutely kills a community faster then anything and is just a bad way to run a gaming community.  Bad for players, bad for business, bad for common sense, and its even bad for the Advancement of Social Acceptance of Progressive Values, if that's the argument.

I would +1 this if I had the right.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 11:24:56 pm
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say calling someone a bundle of sticks doesn't mean they are legitimate homophobes. It also doesn't mean they lack empathy or caring. It doesn't mean they are a faceless, internet sociopath. Also hate could come from any societal background.You shouldn't make such assumptions about people.

No, I wasn't saying it came from being a sociopath, I was saying it came from ignorance, and that if it wasn't for ignorance it would be from being a sociopath.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 11:26:33 pm
Why bother even banning racial slurs, then?  I say let's let this game be free for all if you're only going to barely part way.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 27, 2013, 11:28:02 pm
Why bother even banning racial slurs, then?  I say let's let this game be free for all if you're only going to barely part way.

Now you're making sense.

Free Spook for fuck sake.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 11:29:07 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 27, 2013, 11:29:41 pm
Why bother even banning racial slurs, then?  I say let's let this game be free for all if you're only going to barely part way.

Finally you have said something that isn't completely retarded and gay.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 11:31:03 pm
I wasn't here when they decided saying the n word was against the rules, but I imagine there were a ton of tears and people swearing the game would lose half it's population and FREE SPEECH
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 11:32:15 pm
I wasn't here when they decided saying the n word was against the rules, but I imagine there were a ton of tears and people swearing the game would lose half it's population and FREE SPEECH
yet it's perfectly ok for black people to call each other niggas but when anyone else does it....O LAWDY LAWD
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: dynamike on March 27, 2013, 11:34:37 pm
Its a competitive game.  Like playing soccer.   You call people bitches, bundle of stickss, stuff like that on actual sports fields all the time because of adrenaline, as a fan or player.


Quote from: http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/socialresponsibility/antiracism/index.html
FIFA against discrimination

FIFA recognises its responsibility to lead the way in abolishing all forms of discrimination in football. Article 3 of the FIFA Statutes states:

“Discrimination of any kind against a country, private person or group of people on account of ethnic origin, gender, language, religion, politics or any other reason is strictly prohibited and punishable by suspension or expulsion.”
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 27, 2013, 11:35:34 pm
Well, I wouldn't call anyone the N word because white guilt. The homosexuals, however, were not enslaved, and we aren't even insulting them. I don't think most people think you are referring to a homosexual when you say "that bundle of sticks"

You yourself are giving all the power to the slur in this case. Do you really think homosexuals are bundle of stickss you bigot?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2013, 11:35:55 pm
Why bother even banning racial slurs, then?  I say let's let this game be free for all if you're only going to barely part way.

This is why American Politics never works at all.  The small minority that no one actually elected into office tends to be ideologues hellbent on oppressing the majority with their intolerable, unpopular, and often wrong opinions and beliefs, instead of practical solutions and compromise for a functioning, democratic society and state.  Funny how in America that is the hardcore right wing Republicans, and in this thread/way of thinking it is the hardcore right wing Chat N@zis who often sound a lot more ignorant then the people they argue with. 

Funny is because I am a die-hard liberal activist for equality, but I'd gladly pass a cRPG ammendment to ban Shik, Badplayer, Partyboy, etc from ever posting about racism/intolerance + outlawing any future Obsecenity Laws in chat that will obviously be abused by admins to ban people they don't like on bullshit evidence while sounding legit (Gestapo tactics.)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 11:38:03 pm


FIFA is a bunch of fairies all their games have been rigged for years.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 11:39:21 pm
Funny is because I am a die-hard liberal activist for equality, but I'd gladly pass a cRPG ammendment to ban Shik, Badplayer, Partyboy, etc from ever posting about racism/intolerance + outlawing any future Obsecenity Laws in chat that will obviously be abused by admins to ban people they don't like on bullshit evidence while sounding legit (Gestapo tactics.)

I was only banning for a specific slur, much like the rules against racism are only for one specific slur.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: [ptx] on March 27, 2013, 11:39:43 pm
(click to show/hide)
+1'd so hard, i need a new pair of pants

Even if this PC crap doesn't really reach all the way to my corner of the world yet, it's still worrying and irritating as fuck :/

(click to show/hide)

The day i +1 smoothrich...

What, you had a 180 degree turn in life or something? Where's the "crpg is literally crawling with chocolate chip cookies and homophobes" speech? O_o
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 11:42:28 pm
I was only banning for a specific slur, much like the rules against racism are only for one specific slur.
Didn't you just say all in or none at all?
"Why bother even banning racial slurs, then?  I say let's let this game be free for all if you're only going to barely part way."
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Smoothrich on March 27, 2013, 11:46:46 pm

They day i +1 smoothrich...

What, you had a 180 degree turn in life or something? Where's the "crpg is literally crawling with chocolate chip cookies and homophobes" speech? O_o

Haha.  I always said stuff like this in the private admin forum, whenever the topic would come up.  Veering too far into one direction would turn the small, already unpopular cRPG into a "Christian Gaming Server" and completely kill the community.  I'd also vigorously try to get people banned for "trolling" unbanned.  I think most of that shit is stupid, the players and the admins reactions (unless one of them is funny about it) and I think the majority of players here feel the same way, pretty laid back about stuff, can be funny sometimes just in moderation.

I think plenty of people have bad opinions in this community, but the way to deal with that is engage them in public so they have to defend themselves, to serve up proper ridicule and laughs for everyone, and occassional have real conversations about the issues (while punishing the special cases in fair ways, mutes not bans usually, looking at an in game filter).  Conversations are fine, fun, and nice intellectual exercises.  Running an already half-dead game into the ground with a juvenile LOL LETS STOP HATE mentality is just Bad ADminship.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 27, 2013, 11:52:31 pm
Haha.  I always said stuff like this in the private admin forum, whenever the topic would come up.  Veering too far into one direction would turn the small, already unpopular cRPG into a "Christian Gaming Server" and completely kill the community.  I'd also vigorously try to get people banned for "trolling" unbanned.  I think most of that shit is stupid, the players and the admins reactions (unless one of them is funny about it) and I think the majority of players here feel the same way, pretty laid back about stuff, can be funny sometimes just in moderation.

I think plenty of people have bad opinions in this community, but the way to deal with that is engage them in public so they have to defend themselves, to serve up proper ridicule and laughs for everyone, and occassional have real conversations about the issues (while punishing the special cases in fair ways, mutes not bans usually, looking at an in game filter).  Conversations are fine, fun, and nice intellectual exercises.  Running an already half-dead game into the ground with a juvenile LOL LETS STOP HATE mentality is just Bad ADminship.
I am nominating you for best player_na smooth
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 27, 2013, 11:58:23 pm
Smooth you remind me of the people on SA who post rage filled goodbye threads because they can't make rape jokes in GBS anymore.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kafein on March 27, 2013, 11:59:00 pm
When people use the word "nerd" I feel slightly uneasy. I have an IQ of 148 and have been two years in advance academically for more than ten years now. I have never been able to establish more than a handful of stable friendships until I entered college, jailed by walls made of awkwardness from the outside and fear from the inside. I have been mocked more than I ever could handle at the time and I still sort of fear any interaction with immature people, cause you know they might start hating me for reasons unknown.

So there you go. Please ban "nerd". This word is very offensive. Also ban "genius", that one was often not used in a positive way at all. Also ban all their equivalents in French.

(this is an example but everything is actually true)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 27, 2013, 11:59:32 pm
Everyone who has taken time out of their lives to post a response any more length than this one needs to go get a job and some hobbies.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kafein on March 28, 2013, 12:01:53 am
Everyone who has taken time out of their lives to post a response any more length than this one needs to go get a job and some hobbies.

I have no job, this is very offensive !


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on March 28, 2013, 12:04:26 am
Yeah, I'm done.  Here's my first, and last, word on this.

Think of all the things in the past that were acceptable at the time and are abhorrent now and consider it is because society decided collectively it was no longer acceptable to treat each other that way.  Get on the right side of history.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 28, 2013, 12:07:52 am
Yeah, I'm done.  Here's my first, and last, word on this.
good riddance
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Ganner on March 28, 2013, 12:08:39 am
So far nearly all posts in this thread warrant this response:

Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Muki on March 28, 2013, 12:10:48 am
So far nearly all posts in this thread warrant this response:

Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

mmm where did I hear this quote from
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Smoothrich on March 28, 2013, 12:28:53 am
Everyone who has taken time out of their lives to post a response any more length than this one needs to go get a job and some hobbies.

Writing is my hobby.  My posting on the Evolution of Racial Toleration In Online Gaming Communities is practice in journalism for my up and coming book Spergs:  The 21st Century Holden Caulfield
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Casimir on March 28, 2013, 12:44:23 am
Best seller 2013
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: oprah_winfrey on March 28, 2013, 12:56:41 am
Everyone who has taken time out of their lives to post a response any more length than this one needs to go get a job and some hobbies.

Jokes on you! I posted my responses from work. Noy that they were much lomger then yours anyway.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Canary on March 28, 2013, 01:47:51 am
I'm really surprised this didn't happen earlier in the discussion.  I'm out for now, only so much I can handle.
?
Are you saying that there's no racist terms for whites?

He's trying to imply that certain folks are exempt for qualifying as targets of discrimination based on their demographic's privilege.

Partyboy, stop being racist and entitling your racial and sexual-orientational viewpoints to discriminate against other demographics based on the unquantifiable idea that because certain classes of people are richer/in the majority/entitled to something others don't have they are immune to insults based on characterizations intrinsic to their being.

You can't just pick and choose which races to treat properly, if you want to eliminate racism you stop treating races unequally.

I think it's pretty close minded when people can't identify with any feelings other than their own, tbh.  But that's kind of privilege in a nutshell, when the person in question doesn't have to worry about things other people have to.  I mean, either that's the case, or the person just doesn't care.  But that's when it crosses the line to being a sociopath.

Such as when you dismiss the opinions of someone based on their supposed "privilege".

I wasn't here when they decided saying the n word was against the rules, but I imagine there were a ton of tears and people swearing the game would lose half it's population and FREE SPEECH

Quite. It's in a similar position as particular homophobic slurs, in that it has a specific derogatory meaning that is hurtful and that still really gets to some people when said, but is also on the verge of being co-opted by people for a different, less specifically discriminatory usage. One could say, in fact, that because "fag" is still used in a negative light it's worse than the "N-word" because its meaning is not being changed to a form of mild endearment, or at least a more general expression of subject. For some reason the consensus is more often that the "N-word" is never allowable because its context tends to be less subject to interpretation... possibly because of the more prevalent alternative past meaning of "fag". It's easy to see why context matters more than the word itself, considering the extent of the possible use of language. Unconditional authority to punish people for using specific words goes against all reason, maybe we should be more lenient towards chat abuse?.

I was only banning for a specific slur, much like the rules against racism are only for one specific slur.

And that is one of the reasons why you lost admin already. The rules are not only against "one specific slur", it just happens to be that one slur is agreed off-hand to cause the largest amount of grief, whether that's true or not. Arbitrarily deciding that since one potential playerbase/demographic has been unrepresented by the enforcement of the rules and taking an extreme approach to curb offense against that one group is dismissive of the problems chat abuse actually creates and is probably missing the point of why there are chat abuse rules in the first place. It's also hypocritical and just as unfair.

It's rarely ever going to be the case that you can find an insult that someone, somewhere, hasn't been ridiculed with throughout their life, and are thus more sensitive to the term. Race, creed, gender, etc, doesn't matter. If we're going to enter into this discussion and actually try to fix the problem, then we need to actually fix the problem. That is, we as a community do the intellectually honest thing, and we deem all derogatory, hateful statements, as being 'wrong'.

Alas, I don't think this community is up for the task. Few communities on earth would be able to, as a whole, practice complete understanding and respect for one another. But any alternative to this, will either be hypocritical or intellectually dishonest in its implementation.

Furthermore, being offended and having specific offensive terms that apply to you do not entitle you to anything automatically. A "safe" gaming environment is a myth, you can be offensive and make a person feel horrible through entirely legitimate use of chat pertaining to things that by rights are fair and true to say and that no one would ever deem disallowed in chat. If a person feels discriminated against because of their actions or their personal characteristics, they're not necessarily the victim of a "privileged" conspiracy to keep people in the minority from feeling good about themselves, and they don't necessarily have the right to be exempt from being taunted or made fun of. To pick and choose which classes of people are exempt from being taunted and made fun of based on a limited selection of derogatory terms is exclusionary, arbitrary, and unfair.

Simple solution:

Unban Farmer Nate and SpookIsland and use them to set the bar in terms of insults. Anyone that manages to be more offensive than them gets the ban-hammer.

SpookIsland is the only person I've encountered on cRPG that has been legitimately homophobic through in-game chat. Incidentally, he's permabanned for his abuse of chat.


It's too much to ask to "end casual racism/homophobia/misogyny/discrimination against ___" but does that mean we shouldn't try? If it comes down to enforcing draconian chat rules that restrict a large minority or even a majority of the server from playing the game, then yes, even if only through their own stubbornness. Banning five people in a span of five minutes over in-game chat, even as an example for the server, probably does not make the server a better place. I'd rather we focus on things that are objectively objectionable, such as specific, targeted intentional attempts to alienate players using offensive terminology. It may be that it makes for a more subjective style of administration and punishment, but the result is that people willfully breaking chat abuse rules are dealt with and players who don't mean any harm are not punished solely for their ignorance and inconsideration. If you'd like them to change their ways, be polite and approach them as an equal, not as a rulebreaking scum whose privilege makes them your unequal, warranting immediate admonition and punishment. Don't confuse your cause with the law, be civil and discuss problems and the people causing the problems might just respond positively. Of course, it's just as likely they'll troll you in response by using offensive speech again, but in that case if all they're trying to do is grief using chat they're in a less defensible position, rules-wise.

Conclusion: We can do better to stymie the most negative effects that abuses of in-game chat can cause, but "policing" chat and punishing people should not be our priority in dealing with it. If the end result is that we are subjectively dealing with chat abuse on a case by case basis and therefore exclude some underrepresented groups and administrate unfairly, it's a better situation than unfairly determining which groups get represented based on some arbitrary notion of "privilege" and past plight, literally discriminating against other groups in the process.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Bronto on March 28, 2013, 01:50:02 am
Dexx, all of your replies must now contain a patrick GIF.

I'm more surprised the GIF didn't have a corgi in it.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on March 28, 2013, 03:34:59 am
it's a better situation than unfairly determining which groups get represented based on some arbitrary notion of "privilege" and past plight, literally discriminating against other groups in the process.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 28, 2013, 04:27:11 am
I'm gay
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: ShinySpoons on March 28, 2013, 04:35:25 am
What about the Irish and Italian immigrants who were basically enslaved by mining companies?

They banded together to oppress the hispanic immigrants
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Little Lord Lollipop on March 28, 2013, 05:52:59 am
Removing my old friendcher as an acceptable term would discriminate against my old friendchers everywhere. We here at ATTS will violently oppose any such action with our internet weapons. Spergy nerds incoming.

PROUD my old friendCHER-4-LYFE



Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 28, 2013, 05:55:57 am
What about the Irish and Italian immigrants who were basically enslaved by mining companies?

What about Asian and Mexican immigrants who are STILL basically enslaved, paying off their passage to America?  What about the Russian and Eastern European girls who are STILL enslaved in the sex trade, IN THE USA?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Smoothrich on March 28, 2013, 06:06:54 am
Quote from: partyboy on somethingawful forums
I noticed while I was playing I could see admin reports and got confused. When I hit esc I saw administrator panel. No one had said anything to me, so I assumed it was a mistake. What else could I do? I announced in pink text that homophobia and misogyny would now be treated the same as racism. So that started a barrage of homophobic slurs in chat. I warned people, then I kicked a few, then I announced that I would be upgrading them to bans. So the first few started out at 15 minutes, then I had to go to 1 hour for people to get the point. Apparently shik hadn't told anyone else he was making me admin, so Canary banned me for 300 days for exploiting. I was then unbanned and made an admin again because unknown to me shik had also said in the admin forum that they were going to start being tougher on homophobia/racism/misogyny. Then they took shik out of lead dev position and took away my admin again overnight.

One more time: they took away his post because he suggested that people shouldn't be using homophobic slurs, that they should be bannable like the n word. I fucking hate this community so much.

Hahahahah.  More details please.  Shik this is what happens when you presumably follow BADPLAYER's advice on anything.  He is literally a massive griefer and nothing else.

I think BADPLAYER and Shik have been shit talking white people so much lately (despite BADPLAYER being a casually racist chav griefer dirtbag who laughs about 'friend', 'f@g', and earnestly  dislikes asians) that they got the good idea of getting "one of the sane ones" Partyboy as admin to finally make a stand against Internet Curse Words.  Much like when Shik banned some random Remnant player for saying "gooks" in chat once, so Shik, at BADPLAYER's behest, banned him for 7 days then refused to unban him because "white people don't deserve anything better."

Shockingly it seems the devs of the game are not a fan of turning the handful of NA servers they pay out of their pockets for every month into Christian Gaming Servers where the small, dwindling playerbase of the game gets banned for bad language by "liberal activist admins" being handpicked by Radical Reverse Racists (a new KKK).  Hopefully this movement has been stomped into the ground and everyone has learned a valuable lesson.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 28, 2013, 06:26:25 am
lol partyboy is a powertripping my old friendgoat
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: EyeBeat on March 28, 2013, 06:46:53 am
LOL partyboy had admin?

WOW!
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on March 28, 2013, 06:49:08 am
LOL partyboy had admin?

WOW!
yes he did and based off that quote that smooth had he definitely is a powertripper
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Havelle on March 28, 2013, 06:55:09 am
I'm gay and washing my hands of this topic.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Penguin on March 28, 2013, 07:14:22 am
White American men really have it tough! The mainstream media won't cover that though. It's a wonder how even a few white men can be successful under this oppressive cloud of discrimination. There hasn't even been a white president in over 5 years! Where is the representation? Where is the justice?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on March 28, 2013, 07:48:25 am
Before anyone calls me out on nerding for the following let me preface this with the fact that I am currently making $12.50 an hour while writing this. I am without anything to do and am immensely bored waiting to clock out in 40 minutes. If this were not the case I would not be lowering myself to the level of posting in this got-dang awful thread.

Dear Partyboy,

I always think it is the most sickeningly ingratiating way of treating a person to presume that you need to censor the content they see so as to remove the possibility of them being offended by a word. It is insulting, demeaning, overwhelmingly controlling, and implicitly hubristic.

First of all, censorship is not ideal because it implies that the words that are censored have some basis in fact or truth. Their being censored provides them with credence; if they were false or unfounded then they would not need to be censored. There is the possibility that words may be occluded because they were just pointless filler words... but if that were the case, why would someone go to the bother of administrative action just to resolve someone using filler words?

Second, it implies that you have some type of moral or ethical responsibility to determine what is appropriate for others to see. You are denying others the ability to defend themselves from words, implying that the "victims" of insulting words are not capable of protecting themselves. You are asserting yourself as morally/ethically superior in deciding whether someone is offended or not, and controlling their response. That is not your job. That is pure hubris is what that is.

You are not responsible for other people's feelings. You need to understand that censorship is demeaning to the individual. If you remove a person's ability to hear language that they would be offended by then you are removing that person's ability to come to terms with those words. The way that victims truly gain power over words is by coming to terms with what offends them on a personal basis and deciding that these words are either correct and that they as an individual need to change to ameliorate their cognitive dissonance or that these words are incorrect and unfounded and ergo they have no reason to be offended. Not by being told by "superiors" that these words are "bad" and mustn't be said for any reason. That's just disrespectful.

Love,

A Huge Gay Jew my old friend

P.S. Peep my signature image.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Soldier_of_God on March 28, 2013, 07:54:40 am
So, this is still going on... and really off track. if anyone would like to read my previous post, its more humorous and expansive, otherwise, see the more concise statement below so that the heart of the matter can be settled: where should admins draw the line in the sand?

(click to show/hide)

Admins are not baby sitters, and they are not sunday school teachers. ethics should not come into play with their decisions.
there are certain things which intersect with ethical hot zones, like racism, sexism, harassment, and unwanted sexual advances.

the key here is CONTEXT. below are some examples of absolutely inappropriate social context, and ambiguous social interaction.

Racism:
(click to show/hide)

sexist/orientation related
(click to show/hide)

harrasment
(click to show/hide)

and i'll save the sexual advances since that REALLY doesnt happen much...

as you can see, there are right ways and iffy ways to say words. one is absolutely unacceptable social behavior, the other is risky, blunt conversation.
now obviously not everyone will agree what is offensive or not, and someone will be offended occasionally, but generally speaking noone cares, noone is crying in the bathroom after a game of C-rpg.

Specifically, it is the job of admins to maintain a mostly peaceful operative state to the server, and to rectify caustic or inflammatory situations, as well as enforce fair play.

case in point:

i will call all HA's my old friends if they delay the round and lose my multi by their gay behavior,
i will insult level 10 weaboos with board shields and strait swords that get me killed or team hit me.
i will damn the 10 to 1 hero that keeps raping me in battle
i will call people idiots, morons, and jackasses at my discretion for stupid, thoughtless, or asinine behavior
and with people i personally know or people that i have a good relation with, i might make the rare risky joke to their amusement, although i personally would keep in it TS only so noone misconstrued my jest as racist trash talk.

and if any admin here feels that that is crossing the line, i think that it would be wise to evaluate the nature of the internet and of culture.


despite what anyone thinks or feels about it, i personally will continue to express my thoughts and feelings in a manner with discernment, and if i offend anyone i feel it is the right of an admin to tell me to cease and desist the behavior to which i will happily adjust the behavior. i have only been warned a handful of times for risky comments, less than 5 for sure, in my 3 ish years of playing CRPG.

In closing, I think it is offensive for an admin to have the gumption to act as a moral watch dog for everyone on the server because they have a pet peeve and become judge, jury and executioner for behavior that to 99% of the world noone could care less about. i think an admin should only do something if it is reported or becoming inflammatory.

therefore... either act intelligently about it and take words on a case to case basis, or tell people they cant harrass or belittle eachother, make dirty jokes, say expletives of any kind, and absolutely be sure to say nothing more than what needs to be said to communicate.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: racecar on March 28, 2013, 09:18:00 am
This thread is hilarious. Maybe I should check these forums more often.


EDIT: By the way, what do you guys have against Christians?
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: MURDERTRON on March 28, 2013, 09:40:58 am
At least Partyboy was enforcing rules without bias.  Anyone who said my old friend___ got kicked, muted, warned or banned.  Doesn't matter who his friends are, what teamspeak he was in or his strat affiliations.  In my mind, that was a step in the right direction.  He also followed up on everything he said he would do.  He escalated punishments, like he promised to do.  Good admins stick to their guns and don't take exceptions for their friends.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kafein on March 28, 2013, 11:02:01 am
Christians?

Stop being racist !
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Aiyasha on March 28, 2013, 01:41:56 pm
Privilege: the thread

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Probably the best part of this thread for me.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: EyeBeat on March 28, 2013, 01:48:48 pm
Good admins stick to their guns and don't take exceptions for their friends.

Bbbut but but I have no friends  :cry:
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Kaoklai on June 05, 2013, 11:34:35 pm
Whoa, a racecar post.  Do you still play?  I miss you and Saul tagteaming that small battle server.  Those were some of my favorite times in cRPG. 
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Dooz on June 06, 2013, 12:48:44 am
my old friend
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Duster on June 06, 2013, 01:03:36 am
At least Partyboy was enforcing rules without bias.  Anyone who said my old friend___ got kicked, muted, warned or banned.  Doesn't matter who his friends are, what teamspeak he was in or his strat affiliations.  In my mind, that was a step in the right direction.  He also followed up on everything he said he would do.  He escalated punishments, like he promised to do.  Good admins stick to their guns and don't take exceptions for their friends.

Good admins realize when they're wrong and change, bad admins stick to their guns well past wrong.
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on June 10, 2013, 05:54:16 pm
Good admins realize when they're wrong and change, bad admins stick to their guns well past wrong.
<3
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: Torost on June 10, 2013, 08:33:34 pm
NA can be fun occasionally, lots of "flavor".

The spam and retardation that goes on in NAchat does get out of hand fast. (by EU standards :) )

Would be a nightmare to police it properly.

I strongly favor a NKVD-Stalin approach of random swift enforcement of rules.
So that noone ever feels safe. Just state what the rules are upfront.
A very pragmatic solution.
As long as we are talking kicks and short bans.. what is the real problem?
To get less NADrama afterwards, maybe remove name of admin that dealt out the hurt?

Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: betard_lulz on June 11, 2013, 12:59:53 am
(click to show/hide)
Just because you're european doesn't mean you get to introduce bull shit nanny state ideas everywhere you go
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on June 11, 2013, 01:11:26 am
Silly Yuropoors think the only way for people to live is if someone is in control telling them what they can and can't say. I suppose it's their tradition from monarchical society that they must bend over and accept governing D in their anus in order to feel secure and "civilized".
Title: Re: the New tyranny of NA :evil:
Post by: partyboy on June 11, 2013, 02:27:03 am
Happy LGBT pride month, ya'll!  Get out to your local Pride Parade and be fabulous by proxy for a day!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login