cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Ricky77 on November 15, 2011, 04:13:04 am

Title: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Ricky77 on November 15, 2011, 04:13:04 am
I love mount and blade cRPG, but guys common, its getting boaring, wee need u guys to all come back
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 15, 2011, 04:14:03 am
Sorry too busy playing Skyrim with friends and making screenshots. See you later in a few weeks.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Rumblood on November 15, 2011, 04:23:12 am
People who are new to the internet and gaming are so cute  :lol:

really they arent
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Warcat on November 15, 2011, 04:48:56 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Noooooo! Everyone is leaving and they'll never come back! cRPG is doooooooomed!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 15, 2011, 05:40:56 am
Sorry too busy playing Skyrim with friends and making screenshots. See you later in a few weeks.

^
This.  Skyrim > c-RPG > WB

Also too many asshats in the community.  Single player game is a nice change of pace.  See you in a few weeks (maybe)
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: agile on November 15, 2011, 05:44:17 am
When Skyrim gets old people will come back.... hopefuly
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Dach on November 15, 2011, 06:34:44 am
What if... it doesn't?

(click to show/hide)


Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: POOPHAMMER on November 15, 2011, 06:41:24 am
boaring
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Cepeshi on November 15, 2011, 08:02:22 am
I love mount and blade cRPG, but guys common, its getting boaring, wee need u guys to all come back

come to eu we have 80people during primetimes!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 15, 2011, 08:26:18 am
skyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrimskyrim
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: PieParadox on November 15, 2011, 08:40:34 am
Not only are new games out but for the first time in a while, I've been playing on the official servers.

For me, Gnjus says it best:

Yes it was me for the last few days, "testing" the new patch, WSE, etc, after endless begging from my men & some random people who's names i won't mention here and (regretfully) i must agree with that Slovenian shepherd Mtemko: nothing has really changed in the last 2-3 months: even more ranged people camping the roofs and making these "battles" look nothing like proper battles should. Few evenings ago we had a situation of 10-15 ranged left against 5-6 of us and there was nothing we could do, they just shot us to pieces. Last night i connected to spectators only to see 23 people left in the battle. I asked the lads on TS to help me do the counting: 20 out of 23 people left alive were rangers, bowmen & crossbowmen. I truly respect chadz & his team (contrary to the popular beliefs & forum trolling crap) and I've never commented too much about their work but its sad how they don't care about this "situation", solutions are so easy and they have been suggested many times. That said: I'll never forget chadz' quote (i tried to dig it out but i failed) where he said something like: "We make the game to OUR liking, if you don't like it - don't play it". In the end he was right with that, i always have that line in my mind and when i stopped playing it wasn't a GTX or anything like that, it was just following that simple line without making any fuss about it. These days i succumbed to pressure from all these people and tried to enjoy it again somehow but constantly getting shot to pieces by dozen of rangers is not really fun. "Grab a shield !", they say. So i did. x3 Huscarl & x2 Fat Plate but nothing changed - no where to hide from shooting squads. The only difference is: now even teamwork doesn't help anymore. We're on TS same as before but (unless Panos is here with his trash-talking) we're not really enjoying our time to be honest. Role-playing practicing targets is not much fun.  :)


Also, the amount of long spears is ridic, people with loomed armour (guess I can't blame em with the range) dominating melee... Don't forget crappy maps... Battle doesn't seem as fun as it used to  :cry:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gomer on November 15, 2011, 08:42:39 am
I got a massive boner when I opened Skyrims 3d map OMG BEAUTIFUL Skrim ROCKS SORY
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gomer on November 15, 2011, 08:43:48 am
Not only are new games out but for the first time in a while, I've been playing on the official servers.

For me, Gnjus says it best:

Also, the amount of long spears is ridic, people with loomed armour (guess I can't blame em with the range) dominating melee... Don't forget crappy maps... Battle doesn't seem as fun as it used to  :cry:

We need the map rotation to be updated. PLEASE Down voting seems to do nothing.....
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Erathsmus on November 15, 2011, 08:54:11 am
Seriously, Skyrim is so good when I turn off the computer life depresses me.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: theero on November 15, 2011, 09:43:36 am
Seriously, Skyrim is so good when I turn off the computer life depresses me.

I can do better: I've been depressed for about two weeks now since my new computer is still waiting for the final part to get shipped into the shop where i ordered it. Placed the order at 4.11.11, computer still not left the shop and my old laptop can't handle Skyrim at all. I'm going to die soon just out of depression and lack of dragons  :( .
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Arcona on November 15, 2011, 10:45:34 am
I guess everyone is being Sarcastic right?

I mean you can make a turd shiny, you can polish it, put some cologne on it...

But in the end its STILL A FRIGGIN TURD!

And yes, I'm talking about Skyrim!

What is it about the Computer RPG industry that makes them spend 50% of their budget on advertising a crappy product, 40% on graphics of said crappy product, 4% on the story, 4% on gameplay design and 2% on creative ideas?

How many times and in how many different "skins" do I have to play the delivery boy? How many times do I have to go around slaying rats of someones cellar?

"HEY YOU! YOU ARE THE HERO! THE PROPHECY SPEAKS OF YOU! YOU SHALL SAVE US ALL! NOW TAKE THIS RAKE AND GO BRING ME 3 loaves of bread...."

FFS!

Skyrim is a dumbed down (for dumb 15 year olds) version of a once good series.
Skyrim is an affront to PC users since they decided not to even BOTHER and make a proper keyboard/mouse port and the whole game feels as if the fact that you dont have a gamepad means you should be shot!

And before someones says "but the graphics are awesome!" well... 2 things... friend

a) Big whoopty doo! Good graphics? Is that even something we care about any more or hold as a standard? Its like say "yea okay the movie sucked but the 3d Graphics on this high profile Hollywood movie were soooo cool". How about some story for Gods Shake? How about some originality? Some immersion! How about some real, immersive PLOT that doesnt have to be 110% linear! And no choice is NOT about joining 1 of 3 sides to see the different cinematic finales

b) I am a firm believer that TOO good graphics and TOO realistic ones are a detriment. Much like when you read a book and love it and then the movie comes out and its CRAP. Its because in reality your imagination is usually (unless you are a turnip) much better than anything they can put on screen. Similarly... graphics that are too realistic in a game... somehow make it worse... it seems to real to be real... hence... fake.

So yea, play your polished, sugar coated turd for now...

I will turn to good old M&B that is not pretentious and does what it says in the box!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Spawny on November 15, 2011, 10:54:13 am
I guess everyone is being Sarcastic right?

I mean you can make a turd shiny, you can polish it, put some cologne on it...

But in the end its STILL A FRIGGIN TURD!

And yes, I'm talking about Skyrim!

What is it about the Computer RPG industry that makes them spend 50% of their budget on advertising a crappy product, 40% on graphics of said crappy product, 4% on the story, 4% on gameplay design and 2% on creative ideas?

How many times and in how many different "skins" do I have to play the delivery boy? How many times do I have to go around slaying rats of someones cellar?

"HEY YOU! YOU ARE THE HERO! THE PROPHECY SPEAKS OF YOU! YOU SHALL SAVE US ALL! NOW TAKE THIS RAKE AND GO BRING ME 3 loaves of bread...."

FFS!

Skyrim is a dumbed down (for dumb 15 year olds) version of a once good series.
Skyrim is an affront to PC users since they decided not to even BOTHER and make a proper keyboard/mouse port and the whole game feels as if the fact that you dont have a gamepad means you should be shot!

And before someones says "but the graphics are awesome!" well... 2 things... friend

a) Big whoopty doo! Good graphics? Is that even something we care about any more or hold as a standard? Its like say "yea okay the movie sucked but the 3d Graphics on this high profile Hollywood movie were soooo cool". How about some story for Gods Shake? How about some originality? Some immersion! How about some real, immersive PLOT that doesnt have to be 110% linear! And no choice is NOT about joining 1 of 3 sides to see the different cinematic finales

b) I am a firm believer that TOO good graphics and TOO realistic ones are a detriment. Much like when you read a book and love it and then the movie comes out and its CRAP. Its because in reality your imagination is usually (unless you are a turnip) much better than anything they can put on screen. Similarly... graphics that are too realistic in a game... somehow make it worse... it seems to real to be real... hence... fake.

So yea, play your polished, sugar coated turd for now...

I will turn to good old M&B that is not pretentious and does what it says in the box!

Agreed.

Played it a bit, first sword I found seemed to be a largely oversized fantasy sword. Hurrah...
Then I get to play the errand boy. Walk there, take quest, walk somewhere else, finish. Walk back. Walk walk walk... Boring as hell.
To me it felt like a polished version of WoW. Even has the dungeons and now the dragons too.

I'm not playing it, I like M&B better.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tennenoth on November 15, 2011, 11:23:48 am
People will come back in time, as much as the replay value of a singleplayer game can be (such as Skyrim) it's fairly low compared to the ever changing online communities albiet that everyone has a tendency to troll at least once an hour.

Even with Battlefield 3 with it's online-ness, it's not the same as here, you don't know most of the people you play with and the people you do play with will more than likely include someone from cRPG!  :rolleyes:

There will be more and more people who will trickle back over time, I wouldn't worry about cRPG failing, sure there will be a few people who won't come back but the regulars who have been playing for a long time, will come back eventually otherwise they wouldn't have been playing for so long. Even if it feels like a commitment, (so much time and effort to get to where you were, don't want to let it go to waste) people will come back.

Just give it time, there was always going to be a drop around the time large titles are released, and two at once (three if you're a console... can't class you as a gamer... errr... console user) then you're going to have a drop off at some stage.

Strategus will keep a lot of the clans around, although I have noticed most of my clan members disappearing from teamspeak, each time there is an important strategus battle at a reasonable time, they're there, waiting and willing to play.
People love the mod, maybe I am being a little bit of a fanboy, maybe I am being over optimistic, but it won't die any time soon. The death will come with the release of a similar game, probably mount and blade 2 where they will more than likely have some form of progressive character online, in which case the commitment for players will severly drop.

I don't think you can expect a massive online game with a progressive system such as Battlefield 3 to hook people for as long as something like cRPG has. I mean, the community isn't quite as close nit, you'll hardly ever see the same players twice unless you're on their friends list, things like that, you're not going to have quite as good a response and therefore time that people will spend playing.

Trust me, people will come back, even if you didn't read this, I sort of lost what I was saying half way through to be honest with you, don't worry, stop fretting, people'll get bored of the other games and will come back, not all of them of course, but the majority will. Mount and Blade 2, if it has a progressive character system, will be the death of cRPG, if I had to bet on it of course!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 15, 2011, 11:28:00 am
People will come back in time, as much as the replay value of a singleplayer game can be (such as Skyrim) it's fairly low compared to the ever changing online communities albiet that everyone has a tendency to troll at least once an hour.

Even with Battlefield 3 with it's online-ness, it's not the same as here, you don't know most of the people you play with and the people you do play with will more than likely include someone from cRPG!  :rolleyes:

There will be more and more people who will trickle back over time, I wouldn't worry about cRPG failing, sure there will be a few people who won't come back but the regulars who have been playing for a long time, will come back eventually otherwise they wouldn't have been playing for so long. Even if it feels like a commitment, (so much time and effort to get to where you were, don't want to let it go to waste) people will come back.

Just give it time, there was always going to be a drop around the time large titles are released, and two at once (three if you're a console... can't class you as a gamer... errr... console user) then you're going to have a drop off at some stage.

Strategus will keep a lot of the clans around, although I have noticed most of my clan members disappearing from teamspeak, each time there is an important strategus battle at a reasonable time, they're there, waiting and willing to play.
People love the mod, maybe I am being a little bit of a fanboy, maybe I am being over optimistic, but it won't die any time soon. The death will come with the release of a similar game, probably mount and blade 2 where they will more than likely have some form of progressive character online, in which case the commitment for players will severly drop.

I don't think you can expect a massive online game with a progressive system such as Battlefield 3 to hook people for as long as something like cRPG has. I mean, the community isn't quite as close nit, you'll hardly ever see the same players twice unless you're on their friends list, things like that, you're not going to have quite as good a response and therefore time that people will spend playing.

Trust me, people will come back, even if you didn't read this, I sort of lost what I was saying half way through to be honest with you, don't worry, stop fretting, people'll get bored of the other games and will come back, not all of them of course, but the majority will. Mount and Blade 2, if it has a progressive character system, will be the death of cRPG, if I had to bet on it of course!

On MW3 you do lol. It's rather sad though, Console versions got like 5x the amount of players than the PC version lol. I've seen the same people several times in different matches the last week.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Leesin on November 15, 2011, 11:42:17 am
I guess everyone is being Sarcastic right?

I mean you can make a turd shiny, you can polish it, put some cologne on it...

But in the end its STILL A FRIGGIN TURD!

And yes, I'm talking about Skyrim!

What is it about the Computer RPG industry that makes them spend 50% of their budget on advertising a crappy product, 40% on graphics of said crappy product, 4% on the story, 4% on gameplay design and 2% on creative ideas?

How many times and in how many different "skins" do I have to play the delivery boy? How many times do I have to go around slaying rats of someones cellar?

"HEY YOU! YOU ARE THE HERO! THE PROPHECY SPEAKS OF YOU! YOU SHALL SAVE US ALL! NOW TAKE THIS RAKE AND GO BRING ME 3 loaves of bread...."

FFS!

Skyrim is a dumbed down (for dumb 15 year olds) version of a once good series.
Skyrim is an affront to PC users since they decided not to even BOTHER and make a proper keyboard/mouse port and the whole game feels as if the fact that you dont have a gamepad means you should be shot!

And before someones says "but the graphics are awesome!" well... 2 things... friend

a) Big whoopty doo! Good graphics? Is that even something we care about any more or hold as a standard? Its like say "yea okay the movie sucked but the 3d Graphics on this high profile Hollywood movie were soooo cool". How about some story for Gods Shake? How about some originality? Some immersion! How about some real, immersive PLOT that doesnt have to be 110% linear! And no choice is NOT about joining 1 of 3 sides to see the different cinematic finales

b) I am a firm believer that TOO good graphics and TOO realistic ones are a detriment. Much like when you read a book and love it and then the movie comes out and its CRAP. Its because in reality your imagination is usually (unless you are a turnip) much better than anything they can put on screen. Similarly... graphics that are too realistic in a game... somehow make it worse... it seems to real to be real... hence... fake.

So yea, play your polished, sugar coated turd for now...

I will turn to good old M&B that is not pretentious and does what it says in the box!

tl;dr because I have to get back to my life which is Skyrim when I am not working.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tennenoth on November 15, 2011, 11:43:40 am
On MW3 you do lol. It's rather sad though, Console versions got like 5x the amount of players than the PC version lol. I've seen the same people several times in different matches the last week.

However this is console, as I said "three if you're a console... can't class you as a gamer... errr... console user". ;)

You're going to have more chance of seeing the same people again because they're the people you're going to have a better connection to in your area. With dedicated servers for things like battlefield, cRPG etc etc, they're much more capable of having lots of connections (they're called dedicated for a reason) while consoles will just run off the users home network.

They have 5 times the number of players but the actual number that you will see is much much less due to a crappy way of connecting those people. Why do you think that instead of a ping they have bars..? If I remember correctly Modern Warfare 2 had 4 ping bars that represented 100ms between them, 4 bars meant that you had less than 100ms worth of ping, 3, 100-200, etc etc.

On the pc you could attack the files/console and either replace it with a real ping, but you'd probably cry at what you saw or change the number of bars and the interval at which they ran at (I used 10 bars with 20ms between, I was constantly on either a 0 connection (as host) or 80-140) Running from someones home computer in this day and age, unless you're running off a very good connection with high upload, you'll likely have a higher ping to someone down your road than for example, a server that was in London while you're in Scotland.

This is why I don't use console games in my arguments although it was fun on MW2 where people would hack, you accuse them, they laugh and say "you can't get rid of me, you leave and the game will choose a new host" and you go "lol, IP block!" and off they would disappear scratching their heads.

Also, try playing M&B on a console with a controller, i'd say that would be harder to block and there would be a significant drop in skill (although I do know there are a few people here that use a controller to play)

Anyways, people WILL come back, no doubt about it :P

TL;DR

General knowledge about consoles and their connection methods.
My dislike for their connection methods.
Biased views on Dedicated servers.
Laughing at people on MW2 who hack when you're server host, and then IP blocking them.
Try playing M&B with a controller, must be harder to block.
PEOPLE WILL COME BACK, GIVE IT TIME!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 15, 2011, 11:47:30 am
However this is console, as I said "three if you're a console... can't class you as a gamer... errr... console user". ;)

You're going to have more chance of seeing the same people again because they're the people you're going to have a better connection to in your area. With dedicated servers for things like battlefield, cRPG etc etc, they're much more capable of having lots of connections (they're called dedicated for a reason) while consoles will just run off the users home network.

They have 5 times the number of players but the actual number that you will see is much much less due to a crappy way of connecting those people. Why do you think that instead of a ping they have bars..? If I remember correctly Modern Warfare 2 had 4 ping bars that represented 100ms between them, 4 bars meant that you had less than 100ms worth of ping, 3, 100-200, etc etc.

On the pc you could attack the files/console and either replace it with a real ping, but you'd probably cry at what you saw or change the number of bars and the interval at which they ran at (I used 10 bars with 20ms between, I was constantly on either a 0 connection (as host) or 80-140) Running from someones home computer in this day and age, unless you're running off a very good connection with high upload, you'll likely have a higher ping to someone down your road than for example, a server that was in London while you're in Scotland.

This is why I don't use console games in my arguments although it was fun on MW2 where people would hack, you accuse them, they laugh and say "you can't get rid of me, you leave and the game will choose a new host" and you go "lol, IP block!" and off they would disappear scratching their heads.

Also, try playing M&B on a console with a controller, i'd say that would be harder to block and there would be a significant drop in skill (although I do know there are a few people here that use a controller to play)

Anyways, people WILL come back, no doubt about it :P

TL;DR

General knowledge about consoles and their connection methods.
My dislike for their connection methods.
Biased views on Dedicated servers.
Laughing at people on MW2 who hack when you're server host, and then IP blocking them.
Try playing M&B with a controller, must be harder to block.
PEOPLE WILL COME BACK, GIVE IT TIME!

No i'm playing on PC =( And yes there's dedicated servers in PC version. All though 18 player limit and unranked -_-

Also CRPG is not fun! It's addiction! Leave it!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: t1337Dude on November 15, 2011, 11:48:48 am
People should be getting bored of Skyrim soon enough - the game really isn't that great.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Slamz on November 15, 2011, 12:17:09 pm
FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD AND NICE, PUT SOMEONE IN CHARGE OF THE SIEGE MAP ROTATION WHO ACTUALLY CARES.

I nominate Digglez.  No, seriously.  Don't give him admin powers because he is a terrible man and you'll run out of players before he is done enforcing the rules, but someone needs to work on siege map rotation and he has volunteered to do that.

I used to love siege.  I enjoyed the Community Siege server well enough but they stopped updating it, it died, etc.

Now there's the official siege server but there's still some terrible siege maps going on there.  I mean really, Siege in general could just use some work (FIRST ROUND DOOR HIT POINTS OMG WTF FIX ALREADY BBQ) but someone minding the map selection would be a big improvement.


I still theoretically like siege sometimes just for the sake of variety but the problems with it are killing me.  I dunno if I can just do Battle forever.  Also, wtf is up with this B.S.?
(click to show/hide)

(Disregard team names, it's just that bug after playing Strategus matches).  That was official siege one recent night.  What.  The.  Fraggle?  I can't play like this!  I don't know if that was people intentionally breaking the balance system somehow or if that's just what the balance system did for us but it was not a lot of fun.



In summary,
What is happening to mount and blade is that one of the best game modes has been allowed to crap the bed and nobody has bothered to clean it up.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tennenoth on November 15, 2011, 12:17:24 pm
No i'm playing on PC =( And yes there's dedicated servers in PC version. All though 18 player limit and unranked -_-

Also CRPG is not fun! It's addiction! Leave it!

I never understood their reasoning behind having the main ranked game on the easier to hack version..? That doesn't make any sense to me... I'm convinced that Activision are run by a guy with multi personality disorder, one side bent on destroying PC gaming and the other trying to put on a smile to take our money.

I've seen so many people hacking already and I don't even own the game, granted this is youtube but the first one I saw was by Yogscast(..?) and they were on the front page of youtube under the featured list, some phenominal advertsing they did there for Activision, whole round recording of two hackers on his first ranked game.
You don't even have a riot shield anymore to hide behind, causing the aimbotter to get locked into firing at you because you hadn't died, allowing your mates to charge with their riot shields and batter the bastard to death. (At least I don't think you have riot shields anymore)

Silly silly game designers, don't know what common sense is?
I'm getting more and more synical, opinionated and negative about the Call of Duty series, it went down hill after MW although WaW was still very good although the maps were crap.

Ah well, that'll be the first one to go down, then following will be BF3, Skyrim will drop once people either complete it or have their minds boggled by the sheer number of things to do. cRPG is a constant for now.

To the guy above, I just got confused because I realised I was in NA and wasn't killed. Berenger even gave me a decent conversation! xD
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Cepeshi on November 15, 2011, 12:26:55 pm
No idea how this turned to PC vs Console, but hey, i got it all  :mrgreen:

I mean, i play crpg on my desktop, and when bored i just load up guitar hero (funnily enuff made by Activision  :P) and relax or just watch some porn/simpsons or whatnot.

Anyways, i like this, i was able to sit on x5 for quite a long time on this mid populated server, as on smaller scale battles your influence is bigger  :mrgreen: So enjoy the rides on multis with the few active friends you have untill the hordes come back.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tennenoth on November 15, 2011, 12:31:35 pm
No idea how this turned to PC vs Console, but hey, i got it all  :mrgreen:

I mean, i play crpg on my desktop, and when bored i just load up guitar hero (funnily enuff made by Activision  :P) and relax or just watch some porn/simpsons or whatnot.

Anyways, i like this, i was able to sit on x5 for quite a long time on this mid populated server, as on smaller scale battles your influence is bigger  :mrgreen: So enjoy the rides on multis with the few active friends you have untill the hordes come back.

Always seen consoles as casual games, never the more hardcore ones if I am honest, this wasn't really a PC vs Console conversation more just a light discussion between the communities surrounding the games and the way they actually work.

But yes, enjoy that x5 for a little longer, get a large gap between the Skryim & BF3 fanatics and you'll be laughing when they come back all rusty! ;)
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: bagge on November 15, 2011, 12:34:33 pm
Winston_Churchill's signature is win lul
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 15, 2011, 12:38:22 pm
No idea how this turned to PC vs Console, but hey, i got it all  :mrgreen:

I mean, i play crpg on my desktop, and when bored i just load up guitar hero (funnily enuff made by Activision  :P) and relax or just watch some porn/simpsons or whatnot.

How the hell did you manage to put in Porn and simpsons right next to eachother lol.


I never understood their reasoning behind having the main ranked game on the easier to hack version..? That doesn't make any sense to me... I'm convinced that Activision are run by a guy with multi personality disorder, one side bent on destroying PC gaming and the other trying to put on a smile to take our money.

I've seen so many people hacking already and I don't even own the game, granted this is youtube but the first one I saw was by Yogscast(..?) and they were on the front page of youtube under the featured list, some phenominal advertsing they did there for Activision, whole round recording of two hackers on his first ranked game.
You don't even have a riot shield anymore to hide behind, causing the aimbotter to get locked into firing at you because you hadn't died, allowing your mates to charge with their riot shields and batter the bastard to death. (At least I don't think you have riot shields anymore)

Silly silly game designers, don't know what common sense is?
I'm getting more and more synical, opinionated and negative about the Call of Duty series, it went down hill after MW although WaW was still very good although the maps were crap.

Ah well, that'll be the first one to go down, then following will be BF3, Skyrim will drop once people either complete it or have their minds boggled by the sheer number of things to do. cRPG is a constant for now.

To the guy above, I just got confused because I realised I was in NA and wasn't killed. Berenger even gave me a decent conversation! xD

Well from my point of view i can understand not making dedicated servers giving off XP. Like in COD 4 people would mod it and make gaining XP so damn easy and ''legitimate''.

And as for modding tools, i believe they didn't put it in because (which i also share) that it would separate the PC MW3 community as well big mods being made which IW didn't have anything to do with.

Plus the fact that you cannot make money off of it lol.

Also, actually there's Riot Shields available. Plus there's 2 prof's for them too. Melee or Speed which either increase your melee speed or the speed itself while running with the shield.

So yeah works wonders versus Aimbotters. And ''noobtubes'' are nerfed so much that you can even survive direct impact from secondary ''Noobtube''.

All in all it's a good game and doesn't deserve as much hate as it have gotten from the PC community mostly.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Cepeshi on November 15, 2011, 12:38:44 pm
Always seen consoles as casual games, never the more hardcore ones if I am honest, this wasn't really a PC vs Console conversation more just a light discussion between the communities surrounding the games and the way they actually work.

But yes, enjoy that x5 for a little longer, get a large gap between the Skryim & BF3 fanatics and you'll be laughing when they come back all rusty! ;)

indeed, i have seen rarely any GK or Byzantium online, luckily for me  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Christo on November 15, 2011, 12:54:55 pm
I'm still waiting for an update, many, many great suggestions were written, to solve the problems described by.. almost anyone with a brain?

Just look at Gnjus' quoted post in the topic. Couldn't agree more.


Imo what needs to get a fix/implementation:

-Loomed armors

-''Banner'' Balance (The method, so randoms cannot hijack banners to milk x5/mess up the game, and a special way to indentify clans)

-Regular Balance (So that we actually have a CHANCE to win, not the ridiculous battles that made me play like 1 hour in two weeks.)

-Battle Ladder/Roofcamping issue. Enough said, I don't care about ranged lobbyists saying it's 'Tactical'. My ass is tactical, not hiding up there 24/7. Cowards.

-Gamemodes that actually REWARD teamplay? Capture the flag, or something like TF2's Control point mode. Let it be anything, just don't mess it up like DTV, and make it playing worthwile. And fun.

-Also other stuff like those annoying teamhits, bounces, and hit registration problems. I've seen them too.

The biggest problem is that our main mode, 'Battle', is getting dusty. It doesn't even represent a medieval battle at all.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: The_Angle on November 15, 2011, 12:56:47 pm
I was in the Byzantium teamspeak at one stage - everyone was playing Skyrim, swear down.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Cepeshi on November 15, 2011, 12:59:29 pm
How the hell did you manage to put in Porn and simpsons right next to eachother lol.


Up until quite recent time these were the only things i used to watch  :mrgreen: I actually do even while i play, dual monitors ftw.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tennenoth on November 15, 2011, 12:59:51 pm
Well from my point of view i can understand not making dedicated servers giving off XP. Like in COD 4 people would mod it and make gaining XP so damn easy and ''legitimate''.

And as for modding tools, i believe they didn't put it in because (which i also share) that it would separate the PC MW3 community as well big mods being made which IW didn't have anything to do with.

Plus the fact that you cannot make money off of it lol.

Also, actually there's Riot Shields available. Plus there's 2 prof's for them too. Melee or Speed which either increase your melee speed or the speed itself while running with the shield.

So yeah works wonders versus Aimbotters. And ''noobtubes'' are nerfed so much that you can even survive direct impact from secondary ''Noobtube''.

All in all it's a good game and doesn't deserve as much hate as it have gotten from the PC community mostly.

Ah well, then the riot shields are a big help ^^

Good to see noobtubes are nerfed as well.

CoD will always have hate from me, they ruined my favourite game with console ideals, I play on the PC because I don't want to use a console, don't start giving me console stuff on a PC!  :shock:

Modding tools, of course, I can completely understand why you'd say that, but it's still do-able, if you look at MW2, people were still modding the servers in order to give you instant max level and all unlocks, having dedicated servers or having individual servers makes no difference, it's still do-able just with dedi's, modding and no thought about how to stop it it's more wide-spread.
They'll have learnt how to stop most of it but of course there will always be people who by-pass it, hence why we have hackers in any game we play, there are ways to exploit a system which will be countered by the developers and then countered by hackers, so on and so forth.

I enjoyed CoD2 since my clan back then had a programmer who modded in a "medic system" and "cookable grenades", we had a massive player base since people enjoyed the changes, now they're basically widespread haha.
Without modding in these games we'd have so much less, stopping people from doing it has never been the best thing in my view but it'll decrease the life span of a game for many people. I wouldn't still be playing M&B if it wasn't for cRPG.

I wish I had this conversation a couple of weeks back, part of my coursework was to do a presentation on "Software Engineering and the modding community", cRPG was one of my examples of how mods can increase the life span of a game, how mods can collect communities, stay in a permenant beta phase etc etc etc blah blah blah no one cares.

I can see why though, restricting modding makes it more difficult and gives them more time to stamp on people who crack it before it gets too widespread.

Although on top of that it would be bloody easy given the fact that most CoD games use something similar to "steam cloud" and therefore it could have a basic system that says "wait a minute, there is no way he went from level 23 to 45 in four and a half minutes, back to level 23 you cheating scum!" Wouldn't be hard with some basic maths! ;) Not fullproof but it would again make it harder and allow the developers to learn! :P
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 15, 2011, 01:18:21 pm
Ah well, then the riot shields are a big help ^^

Good to see noobtubes are nerfed as well.

CoD will always have hate from me, they ruined my favourite game with console ideals, I play on the PC because I don't want to use a console, don't start giving me console stuff on a PC!  :shock:

Modding tools, of course, I can completely understand why you'd say that, but it's still do-able, if you look at MW2, people were still modding the servers in order to give you instant max level and all unlocks, having dedicated servers or having individual servers makes no difference, it's still do-able just with dedi's, modding and no thought about how to stop it it's more wide-spread.
They'll have learnt how to stop most of it but of course there will always be people who by-pass it, hence why we have hackers in any game we play, there are ways to exploit a system which will be countered by the developers and then countered by hackers, so on and so forth.

I enjoyed CoD2 since my clan back then had a programmer who modded in a "medic system" and "cookable grenades", we had a massive player base since people enjoyed the changes, now they're basically widespread haha.
Without modding in these games we'd have so much less, stopping people from doing it has never been the best thing in my view but it'll decrease the life span of a game for many people. I wouldn't still be playing M&B if it wasn't for cRPG.

I wish I had this conversation a couple of weeks back, part of my coursework was to do a presentation on "Software Engineering and the modding community", cRPG was one of my examples of how mods can increase the life span of a game, how mods can collect communities, stay in a permenant beta phase etc etc etc blah blah blah no one cares.

I can see why though, restricting modding makes it more difficult and gives them more time to stamp on people who crack it before it gets too widespread.

Although on top of that it would be bloody easy given the fact that most CoD games use something similar to "steam cloud" and therefore it could have a basic system that says "wait a minute, there is no way he went from level 23 to 45 in four and a half minutes, back to level 23 you cheating scum!" Wouldn't be hard with some basic maths! ;) Not fullproof but it would again make it harder and allow the developers to learn! :P

Yeah, well it's obviously because Casual Gamers and adults usually rather get a console and just plug it in their TV and just go from there on. Much easier to make money out of consoles. More accessible and socially acceptable to play on Consoles nowadays  :P

And yeah the hacking bit sucks. Well atleast you can exit the matches to avoid it.


And the community for MW3 is fun for trolling purposes and such. But i remember when COD 4 came out. Was so great then. No people with tons of Xxxxx's and Zzzz's in their names nor people complaining about your playstyles and Quickscoping lovers. Hate OpTic and Faze for it lol.

Ruined the community a bit with it. Many people see COD now as a ''Game that you rush with snipers and try to make your kills look as stylish as spin as much as possible lol.

Atleast BF3 is the opposite.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Christo on November 15, 2011, 01:34:51 pm
Bloody Nine, care to explain your ignorant -1ing?

I have nothing against people with a different opinion.

So, state yours.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tennenoth on November 15, 2011, 02:24:37 pm
Yeah, well it's obviously because Casual Gamers and adults usually rather get a console and just plug it in their TV and just go from there on. Much easier to make money out of consoles. More accessible and socially acceptable to play on Consoles nowadays  :P

And yeah the hacking bit sucks. Well atleast you can exit the matches to avoid it.


And the community for MW3 is fun for trolling purposes and such. But i remember when COD 4 came out. Was so great then. No people with tons of Xxxxx's and Zzzz's in their names nor people complaining about your playstyles and Quickscoping lovers. Hate OpTic and Faze for it lol.

Ruined the community a bit with it. Many people see COD now as a ''Game that you rush with snipers and try to make your kills look as stylish as spin as much as possible lol.

Atleast BF3 is the opposite.

Lol this is true although as I mentioned before with my "ninja'ing of air vehicles"  you still try and do things that are a little bit unrealistic and that can be seen as stylish.
CoD2 was pretty much the same thing, I enjoyed running around with an unscoped rifle was fun always fun, but it's sadly not possible in BF3 due to the 2 shot body kills with rifles. :(

But yes, consoles are a hell of a lot more accessible to everyone because of their plug-in-and-play nature but you're really missing out if you don't play PC games since you're missing a lot of the communities like this one, despite their bad aspects they have some goods ones.

Ah well, if you can flick between the two with ease and not whining about the auto-aim a lot of these games have, then you're a better man than I am!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tovi on November 15, 2011, 03:06:10 pm
Dragons, magic, fire balls, dungeons... muarf, just some good shit for kids.
I'm 37, I need realism, team work, personal skill etc.
Kids are gone ? Let them play "super hero" alone.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 15, 2011, 03:29:23 pm
Dragons, magic, fire balls, dungeons... muarf, just some good shit for kids.
I'm 37, I need realism, team work, personal skill etc.
Kids are gone ? Let them play "super hero" alone.

I'm 31.  If I want to play with kids I'll keep playing c-RPG because that's what 90% of the community is.  Flaming fuckwad goon kids.  At least on NA, maybe your EU is better.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Cepeshi on November 15, 2011, 03:31:34 pm
i am a youngster compared to the two of you :D
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 15, 2011, 03:40:33 pm
i am a youngster compared to the two of you :D

Templar OldKnight beat all of you in terms of age!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Christo on November 15, 2011, 03:41:13 pm
lol.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tovi on November 15, 2011, 03:56:46 pm
But have you ever played this ? visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Nothing really new with Skyrim.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Xant on November 15, 2011, 04:20:21 pm
Plenty of new with Skyrim.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Angantyr on November 15, 2011, 05:24:02 pm
The End (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoBFhdeR9PE)
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 15, 2011, 05:47:04 pm
The End (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoBFhdeR9PE)

Let's go to Nam and kill dem Viet Cong. And then you can go crazy and kill me and lead some savage villagers as a God.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tovi on November 15, 2011, 07:51:13 pm
Plenty of new with Skyrim.

Yep, new PC : 800 €  :twisted:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: HuskerRall on November 15, 2011, 09:42:50 pm
yeah..bla bla bla skyrim, bla crpg is dead bla

I don't know how to make this any clear

Why God? oh Why? game developers don't like making money!???

Todd Howard (TES & FALLOUT series) and Mikail Yazbeck (MB:WB) should join forces and make a title with:

1. state-of-the-art graphics
2. open world
3. NO MAGIC
4. Warband melee combat, mounted combat mechanics
5. NO MAGIC
6. use the creation engine or unreal engine 3.x
7. NO MAGIC
8. Pletora of Items
9. NO WEEABOO
10. David Jones's APB Reloaded Character customization
11. Bioware's storywriting and companion characterization
12. ?????
13. Profit

Imagine the posibilities
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: POOPHAMMER on November 15, 2011, 11:38:03 pm
yeah..bla bla bla skyrim, bla crpg is dead bla

I don't know how to make this any clear

Why God? oh Why? game developers don't like making money!???

Todd Howard (TES & FALLOUT series) and Mikail Yazbeck (MB:WB) should join forces and make a title with:

1. state-of-the-art graphics
2. open world
3. NO MAGIC
4. Warband melee combat, mounted combat mechanics
5. NO MAGIC
6. use the creation engine or unreal engine 3.x
7. NO MAGIC
8. Pletora of Items
9. NO WEEABOO
10. David Jones's APB Reloaded Character customization
11. Bioware's storywriting and companion characterization
12. ?????
13. Profit

Imagine the posibilities

w0w dis game sux there r no acheevvments n no killstreaks lol loser u wont find me playin dis on xbox live
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the
Post by: robert_namo on November 15, 2011, 11:43:30 pm
I once got a difficulty shot of 14 in single player and unlocked 2 achievments! I play single player more often now, oh and I don't play skyrim...
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gomer on November 16, 2011, 01:39:53 am
Winston_Churchill's signature is win lul

AMERRRRICA
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 16, 2011, 02:53:14 am
Let's go to Nam and kill dem Viet Cong. And then you can go crazy and kill me and lead some savage villagers as a God.

and call it apocalypse now!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: dreadnok on November 16, 2011, 03:14:24 am
I guess everyone is being Sarcastic right?

I mean you can make a turd shiny, you can polish it, put some cologne on it...

But in the end its STILL A FRIGGIN TURD!

And yes, I'm talking about Skyrim!

What is it about the Computer RPG industry that makes them spend 50% of their budget on advertising a crappy product, 40% on graphics of said crappy product, 4% on the story, 4% on gameplay design and 2% on creative ideas?

How many times and in how many different "skins" do I have to play the delivery boy? How many times do I have to go around slaying rats of someones cellar?

"HEY YOU! YOU ARE THE HERO! THE PROPHECY SPEAKS OF YOU! YOU SHALL SAVE US ALL! NOW TAKE THIS RAKE AND GO BRING ME 3 loaves of bread...."

FFS!

Skyrim is a dumbed down (for dumb 15 year olds) version of a once good series.
Skyrim is an affront to PC users since they decided not to even BOTHER and make a proper keyboard/mouse port and the whole game feels as if the fact that you dont have a gamepad means you should be shot!

And before someones says "but the graphics are awesome!" well... 2 things... friend

a) Big whoopty doo! Good graphics? Is that even something we care about any more or hold as a standard? Its like say "yea okay the movie sucked but the 3d Graphics on this high profile Hollywood movie were soooo cool". How about some story for Gods Shake? How about some originality? Some immersion! How about some real, immersive PLOT that doesnt have to be 110% linear! And no choice is NOT about joining 1 of 3 sides to see the different cinematic finales

b) I am a firm believer that TOO good graphics and TOO realistic ones are a detriment. Much like when you read a book and love it and then the movie comes out and its CRAP. Its because in reality your imagination is usually (unless you are a turnip) much better than anything they can put on screen. Similarly... graphics that are too realistic in a game... somehow make it worse... it seems to real to be real... hence... fake.

So yea, play your polished, sugar coated turd for now...

I will turn to good old M&B that is not pretentious and does what it says in the box!


 i would have to totally disagree i dont play any types of skyrim type games and this one is amazing. shut the fuck and stop being to cool for the room
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Huey Newton on November 16, 2011, 04:18:41 am
Appreciate the low pop. while you can. Cause when the holiday season rolls around in december NA-1 will be full 24/7. Thats not an exaggeration, it happened last year too, and we have an even larger community now with less NA servers.
My laptop is gonna explode
FML
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Christo on November 16, 2011, 04:21:11 am
Last year was special because of the steam sales on warband.

Many people bought it, played for a few days, then quit.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Miley on November 16, 2011, 06:31:47 am
Simple answer--Skyrim
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: SixThumbs on November 16, 2011, 06:48:26 am
Skyrim sucks, there's no thaumaturgy.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 16, 2011, 08:27:13 am

9. NO WEEABOO


another racist raises his fist in defiance.   :rolleyes:
lol
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gomer on November 16, 2011, 08:58:20 am
I think the population in chadz-Rpg had dropped because many people are accepting Christ as their Savior and can't play Sundays and therefor must do two days of faping Saturday and there for download so much porn on Saturday there computers all explode..... And due to such a high demand of new computer orders Microsoft is in a slum so the community will be down for awhile.....


Or Skyrim
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Erathsmus on November 16, 2011, 09:19:10 am
I guess everyone is being Sarcastic right?

I mean you can make a turd shiny, you can polish it, put some cologne on it...

But in the end its STILL A FRIGGIN TURD!

And yes, I'm talking about Skyrim!

What is it about the Computer RPG industry that makes them spend 50% of their budget on advertising a crappy product, 40% on graphics of said crappy product, 4% on the story, 4% on gameplay design and 2% on creative ideas?

How many times and in how many different "skins" do I have to play the delivery boy? How many times do I have to go around slaying rats of someones cellar?

"HEY YOU! YOU ARE THE HERO! THE PROPHECY SPEAKS OF YOU! YOU SHALL SAVE US ALL! NOW TAKE THIS RAKE AND GO BRING ME 3 loaves of bread...."

FFS!

Skyrim is a dumbed down (for dumb 15 year olds) version of a once good series.
Skyrim is an affront to PC users since they decided not to even BOTHER and make a proper keyboard/mouse port and the whole game feels as if the fact that you dont have a gamepad means you should be shot!

And before someones says "but the graphics are awesome!" well... 2 things... friend

a) Big whoopty doo! Good graphics? Is that even something we care about any more or hold as a standard? Its like say "yea okay the movie sucked but the 3d Graphics on this high profile Hollywood movie were soooo cool". How about some story for Gods Shake? How about some originality? Some immersion! How about some real, immersive PLOT that doesnt have to be 110% linear! And no choice is NOT about joining 1 of 3 sides to see the different cinematic finales

b) I am a firm believer that TOO good graphics and TOO realistic ones are a detriment. Much like when you read a book and love it and then the movie comes out and its CRAP. Its because in reality your imagination is usually (unless you are a turnip) much better than anything they can put on screen. Similarly... graphics that are too realistic in a game... somehow make it worse... it seems to real to be real... hence... fake.

So yea, play your polished, sugar coated turd for now...

I will turn to good old M&B that is not pretentious and does what it says in the box!

What? This game and its entire series have been one of the greatest things that ever happened to the gaming market.

They stand by the fact that they don't have to have multiplayer to make a game fun, they also spend copiuos amounts of time coming up with lore, creating randomization generators, making it playable for whatever class you would like. This game is a beacon to all of the RPGs on the market, in that it promotes attention to detail, and innovation above all else. Not only that, but they implement what their crowd wants into the game...Most of the new content is stuff that people really wanted to see, and ended up modding into Oblivion.

Yes, it has better graphics than its predecesors...Why shouldn't it? It only immerses players deeper into the experience.

If you hate doing quests like fetching bread, I would like you to look at RPGs in general. Take a look at mount and blade single player, how many times have you been asked to go herd some stupid cattle? If you are fetching bread the entire time in Skryim, I suggest you stop what you are doing, and immediately kill the baker...because its a game that promotes choice, and you can do that sort of thing.

Bashing Skyrim seems like a pathetic attempt at being a hipster.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Arcona on November 16, 2011, 01:13:10 pm
@Erathsmus

I have done the horrible quests in single player Warband a total of : 0 times.

Because I was roleplaying a squire and considered myself above collecting cattle, training some loser lords men and being a messenger boy.

I did do quests about starting wars or ruining one nobles honor to favor another or hunting bandits. That fit with my view of the open world.

They call Skyrim "Sandbox". It isnt. M&B IS Sandbox.

And no, I dont consider Skyrim (or Oblivion for that matter) a decent RPG that changed the game market. Morrorwind? That one YES! That one yes a million times... but sorry Oblivion and Skyrim just no. Its not a hipster thing, its a loving computer games thing.

So until you start mentioning names like PLANESCAPE: Torment, BGII and Fallout 1 & 2 I dont plan on bowing down to games that really changed the industry.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 16, 2011, 01:25:19 pm
Ofcourse Skyrim didn't bring anything revolutionary to gaming world, nor is it a real sandbox.

It's still great and worth it all the way though :D
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tovi on November 16, 2011, 01:58:47 pm
RPG means to play a role with a band of friends. Not to grab some item on the ground, alone, until being half-god.
You can call Skyrim something like "adventure quest" but not RPG.
MMORPG are closer to real RPGs.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Xant on November 16, 2011, 02:20:59 pm
RPG means to play a role with a band of friends. Not to grab some item on the ground, alone, until being half-god.
You can call Skyrim something like "adventure quest" but not RPG.
MMORPG are closer to real RPGs.

Nope.

A role-playing game (RPG) is a game in which players assume the roles of characters in a fictional setting.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 16, 2011, 02:30:51 pm
RPG means to play a role with a band of friends. Not to grab some item on the ground, alone, until being half-god.
You can call Skyrim something like "adventure quest" but not RPG.
MMORPG are closer to real RPGs.

Lmfao, this is wrong on so many levels.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Razzen on November 16, 2011, 03:13:41 pm
Whats cRPG?
All i know is Skyrim and Saints row the third.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 16, 2011, 03:27:35 pm
RPG means to play a role with a band of friends. Not to grab some item on the ground, alone, until being half-god.
You can call Skyrim something like "adventure quest" but not RPG.
MMORPG are closer to real RPGs.

Utter Fail.
Perhaps you should look up the words actual definition and spare us your percieved definition of what an RPG is.
 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Dexxtaa on November 16, 2011, 03:28:06 pm
Derailed.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 16, 2011, 03:29:04 pm
Whats cRPG?
All i know is Skyrim and Saints row the third.

Holy shit finally someone else who got/getting Saints Row 3!!!

Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Torben on November 16, 2011, 04:18:16 pm
well,  i usually dont play any computer games.  than god knows how c-rpg appeared on my brothers pc,  and BAM!  hooked.  would never touch anything else,  but this c-rpg thing.  its special.
i am sure the servers will be packed again sooner or later.
although i wont be back to see it happen,
i know c-rpg will prevail.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Razzen on November 16, 2011, 04:41:06 pm
well,  i usually dont play any computer games.  than god knows how c-rpg appeared on my brothers pc,  and BAM!  hooked.  would never touch anything else,  but this c-rpg thing.  its special.
i am sure the servers will be packed again sooner or later.
although i wont be back to see it happen,
i know c-rpg will prevail.
You funny man!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: IG_Saint on November 16, 2011, 05:56:16 pm
Nope.

A role-playing game (RPG) is a game in which players assume the roles of characters in a fictional setting.

The problem with that definition is that it fits just about every game out there. My personal definition of a rpg is freedom. Freedom to play a role that you want, to do what you want and to create a character that fits the role that you want.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Razzen on November 16, 2011, 06:45:43 pm
Holy shit finally someone else who got/getting Saints Row 3!!!
We should get a drink of saints flow sometime xD
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Malaclypse on November 16, 2011, 09:32:19 pm
WTB good roguelike game.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Teeth on November 16, 2011, 11:29:39 pm
Nope.

A role-playing game (RPG) is a game in which players assume the roles of characters in a fictional setting.
This is why the term roleplaying game is so weird. When I think of playing a role I think of you being someone in an unchangeable story. Like I dont know, Max Payne for instance. You play the role of Max Payne in his story. In what we actually call rpg's you create your own role and can make your story whatever the hell you want, well some more than others. You don't assume any roles. I find what we call rpg's least deserving of the term rpg as far as singleplayer games go.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 18, 2011, 01:23:50 pm
ok guys you all hyped me enuff.

installing that... skyram.. skydream.. skycream.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Christo on November 18, 2011, 02:05:27 pm
WTB good roguelike game.

Thief I-III
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Magikarp on November 18, 2011, 02:10:40 pm
C-rpg needs to seriously start making progression again to make this game fun. It's been a while since I was excited about a new patch.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Warcat on November 18, 2011, 02:18:53 pm
I'd like to see the CTF game mode brought back was quite fun when we had it.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Ganner on November 18, 2011, 02:21:14 pm
I'd like to see the CTF game mode brought back was quite fun when we had it.

It is signed.

I can only approve.

PS: Also come up with a way to make death match or TDM a viable option for a server.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 18, 2011, 03:01:23 pm
PS: Also come up with a way to make death match or TDM a viable option for a server.

This > CTF
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 18, 2011, 03:20:17 pm
ahh deathmatch and TDM... my morningstar approve!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Draggon on November 18, 2011, 03:30:44 pm
"Variety is the spice of life"...

Getting tired of Battle being the only option every damn time I log in anymore. =/

CTF, DM, TDM, Stronghold - need moar stuff!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Elmokki on November 18, 2011, 03:32:02 pm
I've normally been talking about how archers can be fairly deadly, and they should be fairly deadly in terms of damage output, but seriously, this running away thing.

Movement for archers should be about getting to good positions and not letting the enemy close to you by being intelligent about how you position yourself, and even more so coordinating with your own infantry/cav to slow down the enemies and/or turn their backs to you if they have shields. What movement for archers is is standing still and shooting (unless you have to dodge enemy archers) and then running like fuck without most footmen being able to catch you.

Archers sure as hell should annihilate a person without a shield running towards them. Two archers with good positioning sure as hell should annihilate almost any single person if they have range. Hell, currently if you surprise a couple of archers the chances are you get one killed at most and then the other two run away or at worst, coordinate the running directions and shoot you from two sides whilst running away making your only option to try to get out of the situation.

It's sad, but archers are the king of classes right now due to their ability to kite so well. Especially on a suitable map (open enough and/or roofs to camp) there's no class I'd rather have on my team than an archer. With a coordinated team of shield users you can at least make archers fairly useless, but the only effective counter is cavalry, since it's almost the only thing able to catch archers. Dunno, some archers I can catch if I change my gear to cloth from the medium armor I normally wear, but not most.

Simply put: if you get to melee range or close to melee range of an archer, they should be forced to melee. Inb4 rage.

But yeah, I doubt the mod is dying or anything really. As long as they keep changing things the playerbase should be pretty ok until a game that is actually "crpg but better" coms out.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: beniliusbob on November 18, 2011, 04:16:48 pm
I just started playing cRPG two weeks ago and I'm hooked. Actually, I started playing M&B like two years ago or whenever it came out, and I'm astonished that no other company is making something like this. Part of the reason I don't understand people who play archers - the economics of their kill-power aside - is that I like this game because it's like an FPS but way more visceral. I love the clusterfuck melees, poke-sticks and enormous axes and shit flying everywhere. Why would I want to dick around in Call of Duty, Battlefield, or whathaveyou when I can pretend to be a fucking KNIGHT? Playing an archer just seems like a cop-out: I may as well go play Counter Strike.

So if this game dies, when it is quite literally unique (unless I'm missing something big, here; if there's something like M&B out there, other than Die By the Sword, do tell), I will blame it on the lameness of everyone that is not me and this community.

Also: the idea of computer-based RPGs is dumb. Go play D&D like a real man.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 18, 2011, 05:12:26 pm
I just started playing cRPG two weeks ago and Playing an archer just seems like a cop-out: I may as well go play Counter Strike.
Yup.  Yet archer homos will defend it forever and say that you're lame for thinking as such.

Also: the idea of computer-based RPGs is dumb. Go play D&D like a real man.

Every other weekend.  PC RPG's are for the times in between.
My warforged runepriest just hit level 20 in this campaign.  Rawr.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Old_Sir_Agor on November 18, 2011, 05:30:17 pm
And i want to see some new maps on battle server, and more variotions for low tier armor, with weight 6 and 7-armor bonus when +3 heirloomed, we have only 1 shity looked light strange armor. :( :mad:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Anal Bleeding on November 18, 2011, 05:33:17 pm
Strategus battles are basically team deathmatch.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Draggon on November 18, 2011, 06:44:07 pm
Strategus battles are basically team deathmatch.

Accept that you have to farm wolf pelts for 2 months straight before you can afford to have a TDM with light armor & shit weps.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Warcat on November 18, 2011, 10:11:25 pm
Who makes wolf pelts? Cool people breed kittens for money
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Templar_Ratigan on November 18, 2011, 10:20:53 pm
ok guys you all hyped me enuff.

installing that... skyram.. skydream.. skycream.

I wouldnt buy or play something JUST because others hype it.

I usually try to get an idea of  the game first and if I will like it before hand. Afterall I got Skyrim for something to just...play, just for fun and to mess around and be creative in.

It's not often I get to enjoy a game like that these days. Although there is always Spore.....penis monsters or not.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 19, 2011, 02:33:52 am
I wouldnt buy or play something JUST because others hype it.

I usually try to get an idea of  the game first and if I will like it before hand. Afterall I got Skyrim for something to just...play, just for fun and to mess around and be creative in.

It's not often I get to enjoy a game like that these days. Although there is always Spore.....penis monsters or not.

you're right but i'm still playing arma2 and most of all 7.62 high calibre / bluesun mod. So Skyrim is just a toy compared to these 2 and therefore i'll maybe play it later.

anyway looks like developers keep doing console ports... no more PC games. but even as a native pc game like oblivion, once you see mount&blade fighting system, well... oblivion and skyrim are no match.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gravoth_iii on November 19, 2011, 02:39:53 am
cRPG is still superior to all games, people will be back, dont worry. And if a patch is released soon i will definitely start playing alot more.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Patricia on November 19, 2011, 06:25:17 am
I just started playing cRPG two weeks ago and I'm hooked. Actually, I started playing M&B like two years ago or whenever it came out, and I'm astonished that no other company is making something like this. Part of the reason I don't understand people who play archers - the economics of their kill-power aside - is that I like this game because it's like an FPS but way more visceral. I love the clusterfuck melees, poke-sticks and enormous axes and shit flying everywhere. Why would I want to dick around in Call of Duty, Battlefield, or whathaveyou when I can pretend to be a fucking KNIGHT? Playing an archer just seems like a cop-out: I may as well go play Counter Strike.

So if this game dies, when it is quite literally unique (unless I'm missing something big, here; if there's something like M&B out there, other than Die By the Sword, do tell), I will blame it on the lameness of everyone that is not me and this community.

Also: the idea of computer-based RPGs is dumb. Go play D&D like a real man.

Ahhh, the glorious innocence of a new player.

Boy do I miss the time when I saw melee as fun and didn't know about broken game mechanics, rather than everyone abusing everything that's bad about melee such as hiltslash spamming or the laggier than fuck servers with all the long pokey sticks that stabs you through walls or bodies of flesh you're fighting.

Good old days.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Earthdforce on November 19, 2011, 07:54:18 am
Ahhh, the glorious innocence of a new player.

Boy do I miss the time when I saw melee as fun and didn't know about broken game mechanics, rather than everyone abusing everything that's bad about melee such as hiltslash spamming or the laggier than fuck servers with all the long pokey sticks that stabs you through walls or bodies of flesh you're fighting.

Good old days.
Well you just ruined it for the poor boy. How do you feel?!?!?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: BlackMilk on November 19, 2011, 08:03:58 am
Its probably because battle - due to the amount of ranged - sucks.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 19, 2011, 10:20:17 am
Its probably because battle - due to the amount of ranged - sucks.

that's why i just have EU_3, EU_2, EU_5 on my fav list  :lol:

Ahhh, the glorious innocence of a new player.

Boy do I miss the time when I saw melee as fun and didn't know about broken game mechanics, rather than everyone abusing everything that's bad about melee such as hiltslash spamming or the laggier than fuck servers with all the long pokey sticks that stabs you through walls or bodies of flesh you're fighting.

Good old days.

why call them "broken game mechanics"... i call em "fighting techniques". oblique overheads at the edge of the block hitting then feet or ankles... overhead block stun, "instant swing" unbalanced animation bug, longspear facehug succesful thrusts...
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 19, 2011, 10:24:55 am
cRPG is still superior to all games, people will be back, dont worry. And if a patch is released soon i will definitely start playing alot more.


Lol u high?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 19, 2011, 04:38:58 pm


Lol u high?

big mouths strikes again?

EDIT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5CltsEN8DQ
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Leshma on November 19, 2011, 05:01:54 pm
you're right but i'm still playing arma2 and most of all 7.62 high calibre / bluesun mod. So Skyrim is just a toy compared to these 2 and therefore i'll maybe play it later.

anyway looks like developers keep doing console ports... no more PC games. but even as a native pc game like oblivion, once you see mount&blade fighting system, well... oblivion and skyrim are no match.

Dude, Oblivion isn't native PC game. Morrowind was and it was ported to original Xbox, but Oblivion is multiplatform game.

Quote
Ahhh, the glorious innocence of a new player.

Boy do I miss the time when I saw melee as fun and didn't know about broken game mechanics, rather than everyone abusing everything that's bad about melee such as hiltslash spamming or the laggier than fuck servers with all the long pokey sticks that stabs you through walls or bodies of flesh you're fighting.

Good old days.

You're right but... there are still moments like these where you take 3 or 4 of those "pro" players just because they are dumb as bricks (and therefore need to learn those "techniques" to be able to compete).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfXvs2jf2DU
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Razzen on November 19, 2011, 05:22:16 pm
Yes, this is the end.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Osiris on November 19, 2011, 05:28:23 pm
killing people with hiltslash is never fun anyway :P kill them like a man!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 19, 2011, 05:39:24 pm
Yes, this is the end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGXeXm0uMDo
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 19, 2011, 05:42:28 pm
Dude, Oblivion isn't native PC game. Morrowind was and it was ported to original Xbox, but Oblivion is multiplatform game.

by native i mean programmed for a core platform. if gets ported to zillion toy consoles, don't mean it is not done mainly for the PC.

but that's not the point. the point is that oblivion/skyrim have the second best fighting gameplay while M&B fighting system is imo the milestone to consider.
the other classic click RPGs can't even fit in cos is just a dice roll. the only RPG i liked for the combat system (way before M&B 1.0) was dark age of camelot. still a roll dice but there was hit chains, riposte attacks, on evade, on block, on parry, positional moves (flanks, front, rear) and stealth moves (front, rear).
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: godhanger on November 19, 2011, 07:07:55 pm
C-rpg is our little Valhalla, where we do battle with the same beloved ruffians every day.
People on hiatus will end up back here in due time.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Candiru on November 19, 2011, 07:38:54 pm
the hell with crpg
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Templar_Ratigan on November 19, 2011, 08:09:13 pm
Ahhh, the glorious innocence of a new player.

Boy do I miss the time when I saw melee as fun and didn't know about broken game mechanics, rather than everyone abusing everything that's bad about melee such as hiltslash spamming or the laggier than fuck servers with all the long pokey sticks that stabs you through walls or bodies of flesh you're fighting.

Good old days.

No dont disillusion him, M&B clearly has GREAT combat mechanics.  :rolleyes:

Actually to be fair, id be happy if the larger servers weren't so horribly skippy at times, there is nothing like blocking hits that havn't even visually swung yet and killing people half a second before you actually perform the animations for it.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tzar on November 19, 2011, 08:09:29 pm
Bodkin arrows ftw great idea dev´s clearly a brilliant way to prolong the life of the only unique melee game out there...........................................................
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: bagge on November 19, 2011, 09:58:16 pm
Bodkin arrows ftw great idea dev´s clearly a brilliant way to prolong the life of the only unique melee game out there...........................................................


:cry:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Imapanda on November 20, 2011, 04:11:18 am
Needs more updates and map/weapon balancing. Seriously.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Classical on November 20, 2011, 04:17:07 pm
All I read was the topic, because I don't feel like reading eight pages of shallow horse manure that usually pours from the mouth of this community, but..

Strategus is the worst it's ever been, so faction decline is inevitable. Plus it's the Holiday rush for gaming, this happens every fucking year, how is anyone surprised by this?

 
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Christo on November 20, 2011, 06:03:20 pm
Yeah but, November-December 2010 was quite the opposite.

I know it wasn't as good as 11' in games, still, cRPG reached awesome levels of players/etc in dec 2010. Thanks to the steam sale, mostly.

At fifteen, I had the will to  learn ; at thirty, I could stand ; at forty, I had no  doubts ; at fifty, I understood the heavenly Bidding ;  at sixty, my ears were opened ; at seventy, I could  do as my heart lusted without trespassing from the  square./dying. Needs some fresh blood.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: a_bear_irl on November 20, 2011, 06:04:44 pm
Bodkin arrows ftw great idea dev´s clearly a brilliant way to prolong the life of the only unique melee game out there...........................................................

yeah i have to question the mindset, the game is almost entirely based around melee combat but melee is the weakest "archetype" there is, now.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Kalanie on November 22, 2011, 02:56:36 pm
I think the biggest problem is with the massive amount of archers roaming around. EU1 = 20 archers hiding behind 3 rocks/roof/hill 5 minutes a row - No light cavalry can survive long enough to counter mass archers, or its just not possible due ladders or terrain to harass them. Id say only way to distract the archers long enough is to have heavy cav trample around if the map is flat enough for them to be useful, even that is getting difficult due bodkin change and rarely favorable terrain.

Another thing i dislike a lot with current map rotation are maps where archers can control half of the map from one location. I do not have problems with buildings, or hills, or ladders as much as i have with few archers being able to cover too much ground. There should be good spots to shoot but you shouldn't be able to control half of the map from one location that is unreachable, or the archer numbers are so high you simply cannot show your face without 8 PD bodkin spammers eating you alive in matter of seconds.  All infantry maps have turned into archers maps, which makes playing cav ever more annoying.

Im not too worried about balance. Im not too worried about getting killed by archers, that's part of the game. Its just the current situation is killing the fun. Terrain, ladders, start with those if you want to make people play more or hack skyrim. :)

-Kalanie

Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Kalanie on November 22, 2011, 02:58:40 pm
I think the biggest problem is with the massive amount of archers roaming around. EU1 = 20 archers hiding behind 3 rocks/roof/hill 5 minutes a row - No light cavalry can survive long enough to counter mass archers, or its just not possible due ladders or terrain to harass them. Id say only way to distract the archers long enough is to have heavy cav trample around if the map is flat enough for them to be useful, even that is getting difficult due bodkin change and rarely favorable terrain.

Another thing i dislike a lot with current map rotation are maps where archers can control half of the map from one location. I do not have problems with buildings, or hills, or ladders as much as i have with few archers being able to cover too much ground. There should be good spots to shoot but you shouldn't be able to control half of the map from one location that is unreachable, or the archer numbers are so high you simply cannot show your face without 8 PD bodkin spammers eating you alive in matter of seconds.  All infantry maps have turned into archery maps, which makes playing cav ever more annoying.

Im not too worried about balance. Im not too worried about getting killed by archers, that's part of the game. Its just the current situation is killing the fun. Terrain, ladders, start with those if you want to make people play more or hack skyrim. :)

-Kalanie

woot double post :)
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Blackpoint on November 22, 2011, 03:10:56 pm
They will just play Skyrim or mw3 for a month,  then they will all come back!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Templar_Ratigan on November 22, 2011, 03:49:06 pm
Yeah but, November-December 2010 was quite the opposite.

I know it wasn't as good as 11' in games, still, cRPG reached awesome levels of players/etc in dec 2010. Thanks to the steam sale, mostly.

At fifteen, I had the will to  learn ; at thirty, I could stand ; at forty, I had no  doubts ; at fifty, I understood the heavenly Bidding ;  at sixty, my ears were opened ; at seventy, I could  do as my heart lusted without trespassing from the  square./dying. Needs some fresh blood.

I agree, problem is that we have a community full of people who just want everything nerfed or buffed for them, with occasional coincidental agreement.

It's why the game is the way it is at the moment and why so many are unhappy, ironically because of an environment that many of them brought upon themselves.
Still I think I can be just enough of an arsehole to be happy that many didnt notice until the earth started pouring on their heads, from the hole that they had dug for themselves.

Ive repeated this countless times, but im going to again: the game just needs to go back to it's entertaining routes, with all the silly crossdressing and mad weapons as well as a few bug fixes here and there.

Let's dial down the elitist "who be da bestest" mentality and bring out the "party streamers and pointed hat" mentality instead, trust me you will learn to love it.

Crpg was always a mod about freedom of choice, dont take that away.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Kafein on November 22, 2011, 04:54:22 pm
In Skyrim, there aren't 20 archers on an unreachable roof shooting at me all the time. Strangely enough, I like Skyrim.

Ive repeated this countless times, but im going to again: the game just needs to go back to it's entertaining routes, with all the silly crossdressing and mad weapons as well as a few bug fixes here and there.

Let's dial down the elitist "who be da bestest" mentality and bring out the "party streamers and pointed hat" mentality instead, trust me you will learn to love it.

I did a few tl;dr posts about that. But this time it will be the short version : nerf the incentives for winning. Joyful playing > 1337ragegeek fapping. Strategus should be the home of competitive-level gameplay, not cRPG.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 22, 2011, 06:09:58 pm
In Skyrim, there aren't 20 archers on an unreachable roof shooting at me all the time. Strangely enough, I like Skyrim.

I did a few tl;dr posts about that. But this time it will be the short version : nerf the incentives for winning. Joyful playing > 1337ragegeek fapping. Strategus should be the home of competitive-level gameplay, not cRPG.

yup. the whole multi stuff just make you rage when you lose your so hardly deserved x5... all about upkeep and gold. i barely play on siege, and most of the times i enjoy the EU3 (unless gets crowded with the strat players.. EU3 spikes enough even without  50 people dueling.)

let's just remove looms, gold, let's just have STF like chars with level set to 35.

then we balance heavier armors to be used when there is the need and not like a crutch. (example heavier weight)

all this by a gen16 2h with enough loomed stuff to speak against himself.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Phazey on November 22, 2011, 06:38:04 pm
No need to panic.  :rolleyes:

I'll be back after i finish Skyrim. Already getting a bit bored with BF3...  :wink:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 23, 2011, 05:40:12 am
yup. the whole multi stuff just make you rage when you lose your so hardly deserved x5... all about upkeep and gold. i barely play on siege, and most of the times i enjoy the EU3 (unless gets crowded with the strat players.. EU3 spikes enough even without  50 people dueling.)

let's just remove looms, gold, let's just have STF like chars with level set to 35.

then we balance heavier armors to be used when there is the need and not like a crutch. (example heavier weight)

all this by a gen16 2h with enough loomed stuff to speak against himself.

I agree with you so so so so so so so s os sossoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 23, 2011, 07:36:25 am
In Skyrim, there aren't 20 archers on an unreachable roof shooting at me all the time. Strangely enough, I like Skyrim.

Skyrim has other qualities, other than just killing archers or getting killed by them :)
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Kafein on November 23, 2011, 09:39:27 am
yup. the whole multi stuff just make you rage when you lose your so hardly deserved x5... all about upkeep and gold. i barely play on siege, and most of the times i enjoy the EU3 (unless gets crowded with the strat players.. EU3 spikes enough even without  50 people dueling.)

let's just remove looms, gold, let's just have STF like chars with level set to 35.

then we balance heavier armors to be used when there is the need and not like a crutch. (example heavier weight)

all this by a gen16 2h with enough loomed stuff to speak against himself.

Then we disagree.

Joyful playing is not a 100% arcade game. I have and like arcade games from time to time, but Warband offers the possibility to do something greater. The MMO-like pre-january cRPG had flaws, but the level cap, retirement nerf, upkeep etc. removed the magic. I don't want to play the same thing all the time. I enjoy watching numbers grow on a spreadsheet, when those number mean achievements. Patience and overcoming difficulties is also part of happiness. If I wanted what you described, I wouldn't have stopped playing Native MP, because it is Native MP.

Skyrim has other qualities, other than just killing archers or getting killed by them :)

Yeah I can craft armor and shoot shiny things on people ! And oneshot dumb blind deaf bandits whose primary activity is telling their lives ! Ha ! Playing with giants ballistic Dovahkiin launchers !


And sword people !!! Too bad they don't want to be sworded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e55P2XF38O0)  :(
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 23, 2011, 11:19:12 am
Then we disagree.
If I wanted what you described, I wouldn't have stopped playing Native MP, because it is Native MP.

no it's not. because character customization is still there, more items than native, there is a dev team balancing and improving, there are other game modes, 100 slots servers, strategus, BUT the grind part gets removed.

now only because i play since 2010, i have a full set of +3 armor, several +3 weapons. that's a bit too much advantage versus a fresh level 30 newcomer.

but i bet a good amount of cRPG players will leave after a wipe. even by getting rid of "magical" (improved, boosted, giving advantages) stuff.

now most people play to get x5. we keep playing even when we have to do somethingelse but "damn i have the x5... can't leave now..." kind of stuff.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gheritarish le Loki on November 23, 2011, 11:57:14 am
now most people play to get x5. we keep playing even when we have to do somethingelse but "damn i have the x5... can't leave now..." kind of stuff.

That's what is sad, ppl lose their fun for a x5.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 23, 2011, 04:56:58 pm
That's what is sad, ppl lose their fun for a x5.

Game was taken from a grinder with fun elements and turned into a pure grindathon with most all of the fun bits removed.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Teeth on November 23, 2011, 05:52:22 pm
What Corrado said. Native MP, with character customization and more items. Apart from that a hardcore skill based game.

Leveling is a gay arse principle, I strongly dislike it. Don't tell me to go play Skyrim, cause dungeons are a gay arse principle too and ruin the what could've been a fantastic game.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Lichen on November 23, 2011, 06:59:59 pm
yup. the whole multi stuff just make you rage when you lose your so hardly deserved x5... all about upkeep and gold.
The team multi system is the thing that ruins the fun for me. Teamwork is nice but it is not possible to FORCE it on people who don't WANT to play that way. You can 'force' the reward/punish system of teamwork but you can't force the actual teamwork. Serious business win at all cost mentality is the antithesis of fun. When I play I can't even have FUN because all I'm thinking about is multi multi MULTI because without it you go broke and the xp rate is pathetic. That is not a recipe for 'fun' at all. Add on that teamates bitching at other teamates for not magically all WANTING to play with perfect teamwork and what's left is basically just to grind my ass off to get xp, and looms so someday maybe I'll have something(s) to make actually playing the game somewhat rewarding. The whole 'reward' system is insufficient and dependent on OTHER players and not YOU.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Kafein on November 23, 2011, 07:38:10 pm
no it's not. because character customization is still there, more items than native, there is a dev team balancing and improving, there are other game modes, 100 slots servers, strategus, BUT the grind part gets removed.

Bah, char customization is nothing. I'm not here to play the sims. More broken/ugly/not my taste items. Dev team balancing, certainly. But you don't kill a fly with a nuclear bomb, and the cRPG dev team doesn't seem to have mastered this art yet. Other game modes that get you 0 xp/gold and are unpopular. Native has 100+ slots servers. And Strat is in pre-alpha stage, not to mention it's totally boring for the average clan member.

Persistent content was what got me into cRPG because it was the first thing that was missing in Native MP.


One year ago, it wasn't a real problem to have other players much stronger than you. The cookie for winning wasn't dominating everything like it does now. The fun and the xp/gold wasn't ruined by a lost round. People with better gear or higher level were a good challenge, but certainly not unkillable. And even if they did kill more than lower level people, nobody cared since losing wasn't a problem. Peaceful gaming, verily.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Skorpien on November 23, 2011, 07:48:16 pm
I think the most new cRPG players leave the mod to fast because they all have no chance vs the clan guys. Most of them are only Native players and native is..... very easy...

They play 2 hours and think: "WTF I ALLWAYS DIE! FUC**** MOD!" I always told them: "Hey mate you have to play longer! You will see its a great mod!" But nobody listen.  :?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: SixThumbs on November 23, 2011, 08:17:15 pm
I must admit this game does get really frustrating if you have a roster of clan members on one team and a bunch of pubbies scrambling around getting chased by the guy with a two-hander and his buddy behind him with a pike or running down an alleyway full of archers at one end. Then you got the mother fucker on your team telling everyone to "go left" and after two rounds everyone finally does it, still getting decimated, and the next round you see him shouting "go right".
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on November 23, 2011, 08:29:29 pm
I must admit this game does get really frustrating if you have a roster of clan members on one team and a bunch of pubbies scrambling around getting chased by the guy with a two-hander and his buddy behind him with a pike or running down an alleyway full of archers at one end. Then you got the mother fucker on your team telling everyone to "go left" and after two rounds everyone finally does it, still getting decimated, and the next round you see him shouting "go right".

c-rpg can't help that there's no in game voice comm (with the ability to easily mute people you personally don't want to hear).

I've been playing Skyrim mainly in my free time as a lot of people have since November 11th.  That being said, I still jump in the NA battle server in the evenings (off and on from 6pm CST to midnight) and still see over 100 people playing at times.  I was on two nights ago and there were over 110 people on the NA battle server.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Warcat on November 23, 2011, 08:48:49 pm
c-rpg can't help that there's no in game voice comm (with the ability to easily mute people you personally don't want to hear).

Would probably end up muting so many people that the only people left to hear would be the ones that I hear on TS anyway.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Slamz on November 23, 2011, 10:13:10 pm
The team multi system is the thing that ruins the fun for me. Teamwork is nice but it is not possible to FORCE it on people who don't WANT to play that way. You can 'force' the reward/punish system of teamwork but you can't force the actual teamwork. Serious business win at all cost mentality is the antithesis of fun. When I play I can't even have FUN because all I'm thinking about is multi multi MULTI

Sounds like you need a deathmatch server, because your idea of "fun" doesn't sound fun for me at all.  Usually when people say they can't have "fun" what they mean is they can't go around teamkilling, kicking friendlies off ladders or otherwise doing really stupid things that annoys everyone.

Fun for me is hacking enemies to death and seeing our team win the round.  It's a happy coincidence that this also tends to result in us getting a multi.

So I think if there's any problem, it's that there are still a number of douchebags who have not gotten it into their head that their idea of "fun" sucks for everyone other than them.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 23, 2011, 10:32:18 pm
Skyrim has other qualities, other than just killing archers or getting killed by them :)

Yup like marrying Aela the Huntress from Companions and then having rough wild Werewolf sex with her on the wedding night in your house in Whiterun.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: BranStark on November 23, 2011, 10:37:36 pm
What Corrado said. Native MP, with character customization and more items. Apart from that a hardcore skill based game.

Leveling is a gay arse principle, I strongly dislike it. Don't tell me to go play Skyrim, cause dungeons are a gay arse principle too and ruin the what could've been a fantastic game.

Uhhhh wait what?

Dungeons are the best part about Skyrim. o_O
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 23, 2011, 10:48:51 pm
Uhhhh wait what?

Dungeons are the best part about Skyrim. o_O

No...the day when Animated Sex/Prostitution mod for Skyrim comes out is the best part of Skyrim.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Lichen on November 23, 2011, 11:43:02 pm
Sounds like you need a deathmatch server, because your idea of "fun" doesn't sound fun for me at all.  Usually when people say they can't have "fun" what they mean is they can't go around teamkilling, kicking friendlies off ladders or otherwise doing really stupid things that annoys everyone.

Fun for me is hacking enemies to death and seeing our team win the round.  It's a happy coincidence that this also tends to result in us getting a multi.
When I say 'fun' I mean joining a server and playing without this thing called the team multi interfering with the gear, tactics and playstyle choices of a player. Having progression of your character linked to whether or not you get lucky and are on the team with better players is incredibly frustrating and not 'fun'.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: hippy_with_a_scimi on November 23, 2011, 11:57:08 pm
When I say 'fun' I mean joining a server and playing without this thing called the team multi interfering with the gear, tactics and playstyle choices of a player. Having progression of your character linked to whether or not you get lucky and are on the team with better players is incredibly frustrating and not 'fun'.

+40000
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Slamz on November 24, 2011, 05:50:56 am
Interfering with gear = people can't wear full plate all the time because they can't afford it?
Intefering with playstyle = people can't stand at the spawn and have a 5 minute slap-fight because they actually have incentive to win?

I don't see the problem.


Incidentally, you don't have to join a clan to get clan balanced.  Find a clan you enjoy playing with and just start using their banner symbol.  Lots of people do this.

If I'm not mistaken, there's a Euro server with clan balance turned off but nobody plays there.  Most people apparently prefer it on.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Xant on November 24, 2011, 06:51:55 am
I've never had a problem with auto-balance. If your team is losing a lot, take it as a challenge. You're not going to die from a few x1 rounds.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 24, 2011, 07:27:05 am
I've never had a problem with auto-balance. If your team is losing a lot, take it as a challenge. You're not going to die from a few x1 rounds.

Well, not DIE, but if you're not rocking I'd say at least a 100k gold buffer, you're definately going to feel the pain.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 24, 2011, 07:29:31 am
Autobalance is fail, I've seen it fill one team with archers, cavalry and infantry and the other with just infantry countless times.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 24, 2011, 08:19:55 am
Autobalance is fail, I've seen it fill one team with archers, cavalry and infantry and the other with just infantry countless times.

Happening currently on NA-1.  Oh, and the ONLY HA is on which team?  Yeah, the one that already has all archers and cav.  GG...
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Cepeshi on November 24, 2011, 08:22:12 am
How can u blame balance for class composition? Afaik there are banner balances mostly, so... just ask the ranged/cav to use your banner  :mrgreen:

but one thing i dont get is, why it always switches one friend of mine after two or three rounds, we play first round randomly placed, then the balance kicks in, we get together for few rounds and then he is usually switched to opposing team :(
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Kafein on November 24, 2011, 08:41:03 am
How can u blame balance for class composition? Afaik there are banner balances mostly, so... just ask the ranged/cav to use your banner  :mrgreen:

but one thing i dont get is, why it always switches one friend of mine after two or three rounds, we play first round randomly placed, then the balance kicks in, we get together for few rounds and then he is usually switched to opposing team :(

Seek friends that aren't good at this game.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: The_Angle on November 24, 2011, 09:13:02 am
Solution: Take a chill pill.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gnjus on November 24, 2011, 09:34:35 am
Seek friends that aren't good at this game.

(click to show/hide)

Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: SchokoSchaf on November 24, 2011, 09:40:31 am
I've never had a problem with auto-balance. If your team is losing a lot, take it as a challenge. You're not going to die from a few x1 rounds.
You will not die, but you might get old.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Njunja on November 24, 2011, 10:14:33 am
I think the most new cRPG players leave the mod to fast because they all have no chance vs the clan guys. Most of them are only Native players and native is..... very easy...

They play 2 hours and think: "WTF I ALLWAYS DIE! FUC**** MOD!" I always told them: "Hey mate you have to play longer! You will see its a great mod!" But nobody listen.  :?

I play Native and cRPG... "only cRPG" players are not Warband players.

Native = easy compared to cRPG... completely untrue. You can come to cRPG from Native and be good/great at it  but you can't do it the other way around.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: theero on November 24, 2011, 10:27:25 am
You can come to cRPG from Native and be good/great at it  but you can't do it the other way around.

Been there, done that;  we fallens played some Native MP a while ago when official servers were down. Result was quite sad, due to the fact that we more or less hacked and slashed surprizingly easily our way in to a castle in a 100-man siege server :P .
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Njunja on November 24, 2011, 10:46:38 am
Been there, done that;  we fallens played some Native MP a while ago when official servers were down. Result was quite sad, due to the fact that we more or less hacked and slashed surprizingly easily our way in to a castle in a 100-man siege server :P .

I can't say that's not true and I can't contradict but I will assume and will probably be right if I say that most of your clanmates are ex Native players.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: theero on November 24, 2011, 10:58:29 am
I can't say that's not true and I can't contradict but I will assume and will probably be right if I say that most of your clanmates are ex Native players.

That I don't know for sure, but me myself DL:d cRPG as soon as Warband was installed and never sat my foot in Native before that :P . Especially novadays when the average skill-level in cRPG is getting higher and higher, I believe the (skill) gap between Native MP and cRPG will grow.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 24, 2011, 10:59:03 am
They aren't ex Native players except for a select few.

Native is just easymode
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Njunja on November 24, 2011, 11:13:26 am
They aren't ex Native players except for a select few.

Native is just easymode

I must dissagree, but there isn't a proper way to determine or prove that Native is "easier" than cRPG and vice versa. I can only say that I find my way on both sides pretty well. And I'm sorry for talking about something completely off topic.

Or maybe... a clan war between cRPG and Native players....  :lol:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 24, 2011, 11:14:58 am
Dunno, but all the Native servers I went to I had a kd of about 10. Wrong servers then?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Lanic0r on November 24, 2011, 11:18:02 am
When will be M&B 2 released?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 24, 2011, 11:22:37 am
December 2010
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on November 24, 2011, 11:29:45 am
December 2010
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Overdriven on November 24, 2011, 12:02:03 pm
I must dissagree, but there isn't a proper way to determine or prove that Native is "easier" than cRPG and vice versa. I can only say that I find my way on both sides pretty well. And I'm sorry for talking about something completely off topic.

Or maybe... a clan war between cRPG and Native players....  :lol:

Native is easier. I popped on native a while ago and if even I can block tons and get near top of the server with melee chars then something is wrong. I could never do that in crpg :P
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 24, 2011, 03:53:34 pm
Native is easier. I popped on native a while ago and if even I can block tons and get near top of the server with melee chars then something is wrong. I could never do that in crpg :P

same thing. 2h/polearms almost non-existants there due to the retarded amount of OP ranged spam... so basically there nobody knows a damn about manual blocking (besides nDitions duel and other duel servers).

well i managed to be among the killers using 2h swords, maul  :mrgreen:, polearms, awlpikes and a backup shield (otherwise is not so easy to survive the hail of sh*t flying there).

oh and i never felt the need to pull off a 1h something + shield. just did something with the vaegir archer's scimitar but besides that, swadia->Greatsword or awlpike, nord->Great long axe in 2h mode, vaegir->GLB.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Oberyn on November 24, 2011, 04:05:22 pm
Nditions and that one battle server, IG I think, are the only places on native that aren't filled to the brim with noobs. At least that was my experience of it a month or so back, last time I played native. Since the combat speed tends to be faster on native, when you find people who are good they are undoubtedly so. If you take it as an average though, the average skill of everyone playing cRPG vs everyone playing native, it's no contest. Still chock full of noobs on most native servers.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: wayyyyyne on November 24, 2011, 04:34:57 pm
Average cRPG player skill > Average Native skill

Average native duelist > average cRPG duelist
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Angantyr on November 24, 2011, 04:55:29 pm
I've played Native almost on a daily basis for over two years ( since early beta ), all game modes, mostly battle, clan matches and duelling, and I've played most of the MP mods coming out for WB from the beginning, including cRPG, but I think a skill comparison is difficult for a number of reasons.

Different players play different game modes across the modules, in Native you will more or less only find a high skill level on Nditions and IG Battlegrounds - ZHG and 22nd Siege and TDM are more or less only visited by nåbs, whereas in cRPG you can actually find a few decent players playing Siege mode ( though battle and duels are still where you find more accomplished players ). All clan people in Native ( EU ) play on IG Battlegrounds these days however and the skill level there is quite high in the evenings. I dare also say that the current Native clan and duel tournaments, at least in the EU where there's competitive leagues like the ENL, is more e-sporty than the otherwise excellent and dynamic Strategus of cRPG. Duels are also very different, taking place without armor, shields and without any kind of build or equipment crutches whatsoever. And yes, the speed is faster in Native, plus there's other 'gimmicks' ( game-breakers to some ) like superfast feinting with 1handers, lolstabbing with 2handers and superduper accurate and speedy throwing and ranged, plus a lot of other things that have been fixed in cRPG.
The amount of players being fair manual blockers on battle servers is of course higher in cRPG ( at least you notice it more ), where not using a shield is more viable than ranged-heavy Native, and cRPG battles can at times feel a bit like a mix of duel and battle mode.

Inexperienced or bad players can do much better in cRPG than in Native, though, as they can hide a lot of their shortcomings behind levels and armaments. These players will usually just go archers or xbow in Native but will only do reasonably well in groups.

I also find that much of the playerbase in Native, if you go the right places, have played the game longer than much of the playerbase in cRPG, which is only natural given that cRPG is a mod that was developed a good deal of time after WB was released, though of course a whole lot of veteran Native players have gone over to cRPG ( but never the other way ) or play both. It is my impression that many new Natives come directly from SP and many new cRPGers come directly from MMOs, *very* roughly speaking. The chat language is very different in cRPG, with lots and lots of cursing and leet speek which you almost never find on Native servers. I guess this is where the Native prejudice that cRPG has a younger community stems from.   :arrow: This is not cRPG bashing btw, I definitely prefer this module over Native.

My impression is based off the EU communities only, I know the NA communities are smaller and less organized ( no offense intended whatsoever if there's any delicate toes out there, WB is just mainly EU including the enormous Russian and Turkish communities ) but I have little first-hand experience with them, except from forum activity, a few clan matches, some random pubbing and the Nations Cup a year back.

All in all the two tribes are much alike, but game mechanics imposes some differences.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gheritarish le Loki on November 24, 2011, 06:25:33 pm
Native?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 24, 2011, 06:59:40 pm
Been there, done that;  we fallens played some Native MP a while ago when official servers were down. Result was quite sad, due to the fact that we more or less hacked and slashed surprizingly easily our way in to a castle in a 100-man siege server :P .

I remember that, it was pathetic... Went archer and mowed down people, then went melee and was even more sad at the opposition.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on November 24, 2011, 07:31:28 pm
Depend on what server you join - the tdm/siege are just pathetic
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Magikarp on November 24, 2011, 08:55:12 pm
Thought I'd go on a native server, on the good old battle mode. I owned complete teams because they couldn't, or barely, block. Just confirms how I perceived the c-rpg community as being much more skilled.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Njunja on November 24, 2011, 09:10:41 pm
Depend on what server you join - the tdm/siege are just pathetic

Of course, I thought that was implied, on Native I play only on IG, Nditions and couple of other servers.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 24, 2011, 09:37:29 pm
I've played Native almost on a daily basis for over two years ( since early beta ), all game modes, mostly battle, clan matches and duelling, and I've played most of the MP mods coming out for WB from the beginning, including cRPG, but I think a skill comparison is difficult for a number of reasons.

Different players play different game modes across the modules, in Native you will more or less only find a high skill level on Nditions and IG Battlegrounds - ZHG and 22nd Siege and TDM are more or less only visited by nåbs, whereas in cRPG you can actually find a few decent players playing Siege mode ( though battle and duels are still where you find more accomplished players ). All clan people in Native ( EU ) play on IG Battlegrounds these days however and the skill level there is quite high in the evenings. I dare also say that the current Native clan and duel tournaments, at least in the EU where there's competitive leagues like the ENL, is more e-sporty than the otherwise excellent and dynamic Strategus of cRPG. Duels are also very different, taking place without armor, shields and without any kind of build or equipment crutches whatsoever. And yes, the speed is faster in Native, plus there's other 'gimmicks' ( game-breakers to some ) like superfast feinting with 1handers, lolstabbing with 2handers and superduper accurate and speedy throwing and ranged, plus a lot of other things that have been fixed in cRPG.
The amount of players being fair manual blockers on battle servers is of course higher in cRPG ( at least you notice it more ), where not using a shield is more viable than ranged-heavy Native, and cRPG battles can at times feel a bit like a mix of duel and battle mode.

Inexperienced or bad players can do much better in cRPG than in Native, though, as they can hide a lot of their shortcomings behind levels and armaments. These players will usually just go archers or xbow in Native but will only do reasonably well in groups.

I also find that much of the playerbase in Native, if you go the right places, have played the game longer than much of the playerbase in cRPG, which is only natural given that cRPG is a mod that was developed a good deal of time after WB was released, though of course a whole lot of veteran Native players have gone over to cRPG ( but never the other way ) or play both. It is my impression that many new Natives come directly from SP and many new cRPGers come directly from MMOs, *very* roughly speaking. The chat language is very different in cRPG, with lots and lots of cursing and leet speek which you almost never find on Native servers. I guess this is where the Native prejudice that cRPG has a younger community stems from.   :arrow: This is not cRPG bashing btw, I definitely prefer this module over Native.

My impression is based off the EU communities only, I know the NA communities are smaller and less organized ( no offense intended whatsoever if there's any delicate toes out there, WB is just mainly EU including the enormous Russian and Turkish communities ) but I have little first-hand experience with them, except from forum activity, a few clan matches, some random pubbing and the Nations Cup a year back.

All in all the two tribes are much alike, but game mechanics imposes some differences.

a balanced, realistic and coherent review of what is native and how is compared to cRPG. +1

also argantyr, i see you really few times on siege but i got really impressed by your smart and efficient gameplay.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: BlackMilk on November 24, 2011, 09:38:57 pm
a balanced, realistic and coherent review of what is native and how is compared to cRPG. +1

also argantyr, i see you really few times on siege but i got really impressed by your smart and efficient gameplay.
Asslicking at its best! :D
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Corrado_Decimo on November 24, 2011, 09:43:58 pm
Asslicking at its best! :D

yeah whatever.. i'm rude with retards and respectful to who earn respect from me. i never been rude with you blackmilk... should i start?  :lol:

anyway, the old shogunate/risen_melee server was something like the nDitions/IG servers for native. where you can see the best EU players showing off some skill.
but yes.. in cRPG you can crutch on level/build/equipment but often to compensate the lack of effort in teamplay.

also about fighting speed, we discussed it a lot. devs said that the game speed got toned down to give better chances to who ping higher. and it's true because for instance, in nDition duel server, where game speed is fast and you dress cloth, to ping more than 70 is just suicidal.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Gorath on November 25, 2011, 01:44:23 am
also about fighting speed, we discussed it a lot. devs said that the game speed got toned down to give better chances to who ping higher. and it's true because for instance, in nDition duel server, where game speed is fast and you dress cloth, to ping more than 70 is just suicidal.

Too true.  And I used to be an avid supporter of fastest speed only, when I was a native player.  Of course where I played I had 50 or less ping.  In cRPG I've been lucky to have 80 ping and if it was on fastest I'd have no chance.  As is, against decently fast 2h builds with their fucking 15 ping I barely see any attacks in time to even attempt to block.  Medium speed is definately better for a wider ping range.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: ParaGnosis on November 25, 2011, 06:08:41 am
Just came back after 10 months or so of not playing. Been playing for a few days and i'm kind of disappointed =/ Mainly with the repair system. The game was a big enough grind to begin with and now i'm grinding just to use gear I grinded forever to buy. I don't know how many of you played pre 'repair' patch but it's not the same. Hoping i'll get used to the new changes but i'm currently disenchanted after only a couple days.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Vibe on November 25, 2011, 07:44:33 am
Well, I have no problems with repairs/upkeep. Sure you can't run around in plate all the time, but that's kind of the point.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: a_bear_irl on November 25, 2011, 08:47:53 am
native is a terrible and the people who play it are worse, but they are pretty easy to troll
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Templar_Ratigan on November 25, 2011, 04:43:00 pm
a balanced, realistic and coherent review of what is native and how is compared to cRPG. +1

also argantyr, i see you really few times on siege but i got really impressed by your smart and efficient gameplay.

I have to agree, he's a nasty beast.  :D
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: BlackMilk on November 25, 2011, 09:34:34 pm
yeah whatever.. i'm rude with retards and respectful to who earn respect from me. i never been rude with you blackmilk... should i start?  :lol:
:lol:
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: LordBerenger on November 25, 2011, 09:36:42 pm
:lol:

Do eet!
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Leshma on November 25, 2011, 10:36:55 pm
On EU1 server, we have plenty of NA refugees. Does it mean final hour of the great country of USA is coming?
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Lichen on November 25, 2011, 11:15:28 pm
Interfering with gear = people can't wear full plate all the time because they can't afford it?
Intefering with playstyle = people can't stand at the spawn and have a 5 minute slap-fight because they actually have incentive to win?

I don't see the problem.


Incidentally, you don't have to join a clan to get clan balanced.  Find a clan you enjoy playing with and just start using their banner symbol.  Lots of people do this.

If I'm not mistaken, there's a Euro server with clan balance turned off but nobody plays there.  Most people apparently prefer it on.
5 minute slap fight? The multi is incentive to win. It's also incentive for teamates to act likes asses and conveniently blame the rest of their team if they lose. I'd take the slap fighters over lord douche supreme. At least the slap fighter would give me a laugh. I'd rather players had fun. But the multi is not something that the individual really have much control over. How many times can you give it your best while your team STILL loses? It really is just which team gets the better players put on it. You can play better than much of your team and still lose or you can play badly or averagely yet if you are on the better team still win. Frustration, yes, fun, no.

And nobody plays on banner balance off servers because clans like to keep their multi as the byproduct of playing together. The problem is the TEAM multi system is not compatible with 'balance' because if teams were truly balanced rounds would go back and forth with neither team winning consecutively enough to get the higher multis.
Title: Re: What is happening to mount and blade. less than 50 people on NA. is this the end
Post by: Miley on November 25, 2011, 11:59:56 pm
YOU ARE DUMB