Author Topic: 0.3.2.1  (Read 24435 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline justme

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 188
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bandits
  • Game nicks: Bandit_Elsupreme
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2014, 03:44:40 am »
0
was about time to balance thrust.. now i must play piker again :)

Offline Damsel

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 85
  • Infamy: 31
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: GoW
  • Game nicks: GoW_FarmerAvion
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #16 on: January 13, 2014, 05:06:06 am »
+1
this new patch right here.
If you are not strong willed, then allow me to change your ways.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #17 on: January 13, 2014, 06:02:21 am »
-9
It's to all thrusts, actually.

There was nothing wrong with them previously.

Offline Akynos

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 369
  • Infamy: 157
  • cRPG Player
  • Is now an agiwhore :*(
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Skono, Rollmops
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #18 on: January 13, 2014, 10:21:49 am »
0
It's to all thrusts, actually.

Can you give explain what/why you have changed?

PS: Can you also explain the shield buff?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Kudos to Kulin_Ban for the video

Offline Latvian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1494
  • Infamy: 379
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • с̴͎͖͈͟͠ͅу̷̸̻̣͇͚̫͎͇̩̟̖̪͇̯к̀́͠͞҉͎͚͎а̰̤͕̱͔̬͖̟̺͍͎́͞ ̸͝
    • View Profile
  • Faction: one and only DESERTERS
  • Game nicks: u know its me when you see me
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #19 on: January 13, 2014, 11:17:29 am »
-3
Can you give explain what/why you have changed?

PS: Can you also explain the shield buff?
i can explain shield buff, you see someone thought that it would be funny to make flags appear after 1 team has less tha 6 players that way forcing them to go to flag and just camp it with shields that way making it unplayable for such class es as HA or Hx ( yes i am mad and i recently respeced to HA ) something should be changed about this because it is impossible to win for team that is outnumbered now.Lets say situation is 4 vs 10 players left, 10 just go camp at flag and 4 people charging those 10 is certain death, befor this flag system those 4 could at least chose place where to fight best and where they have at least some chances to kill remaining 10. Now its impossible.
people are like potatoes, they come in different shapes and sizes and they all are beautifull
masturbating while looking in a mirror isnt wrong unless its the rear view mirror and you are driving a school buss.

it doesnt matter if you are happiest person or an unfortunate weeper, a powerfull beast or a terrifying creature. we are all equal, in the eyes of the reaper.

Offline Renegade

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 7
  • Infamy: 1
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Listen to the monk or feel his Iron Staff ;)
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Imperial Prelates
  • Game nicks: IP_Renegade
  • IRC nick: Renegade334
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2014, 11:24:19 am »
+1
If your team lost so many without killing a good number of enemies they deserve to lose :)
Freedom of opinion doesn't mean that I have to listen to any crap you say. If anyone wants to criticize me or my posts: Outdoors is a wall that would be glad to listen to you.

Offline Strudog

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 922
  • Infamy: 361
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • A Dog
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Britfag
  • Game nicks: Strudog
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #21 on: January 13, 2014, 11:49:22 am »
+6
 
i can explain shield buff, you see someone thought that it would be funny to make flags appear after 1 team has less tha 6 players that way forcing them to go to flag and just camp it with shields that way making it unplayable for such class es as HA or Hx ( yes i am mad and i recently respeced to HA ) something should be changed about this because it is impossible to win for team that is outnumbered now.Lets say situation is 4 vs 10 players left, 10 just go camp at flag and 4 people charging those 10 is certain death, befor this flag system those 4 could at least chose place where to fight best and where they have at least some chances to kill remaining 10. Now its impossible.

if it was melee 4 vs melee 10, the 4 still has the chance to win, it takes 30 seconds for the flags to appear when the player count in one team reaches 6, so this directly nerfs HA's, HX's and ranged in general, which in fact a great thing, becausebefore you had to wait 4 minutes if there were 4 HA's running around before you could take flags, now the flags pop up 30 seconds later and the HA's and HX's have to fight directly to have a chance of winning.

I will take last night as an example, there must of been about 15-20 HA's on last night, Fallen, Eques and the shit HA clan with Prpavi and all that were all HA's, all pretty much on the same team. What happened? flags spawned when all their infantry died, becaus ethey didn tprotect them, found they were last ones alive every round and lost because as HA it is impossible to take the flags, all in all i say it has become a great addition, HA's can no longer delay at the end of rounds and that a lot of them will mean that your team will lose.
This is the internet.
Men are men
Women are men
Little girls are FBI agents.
Those are the rules no?

Offline Tovi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 387
  • Infamy: 251
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: OdE
  • Game nicks: KrisTovi
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #22 on: January 13, 2014, 12:02:41 pm »
+1
What about new items ? I can see some heraldic stuffs and some new helmets and gloves.

PS : colored pelt hoods are cool for clans !

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
« Last Edit: January 13, 2014, 12:22:31 pm by Tovi »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #23 on: January 13, 2014, 12:04:33 pm »
+6
More is coming in next patch. Remember, we have a voting process that can take up to two weeks.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?

Offline Tindel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 333
  • Infamy: 238
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tindel
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #24 on: January 13, 2014, 01:04:41 pm »
0
The thrust change feels targeted to dagger/really fast 1h spam and in general back2back thrusts.

I dont think that  little slight delay in the ready animation will change much for me, since i generally use holds when i thrust anyway. And my weapon is one of the longer slower swords.

I think it will be a bit easier to block other peoples thrust since you have a tiny bit more warning.
Not having played much its to early to say.

Offline Tovi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 387
  • Infamy: 251
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: OdE
  • Game nicks: KrisTovi
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #25 on: January 13, 2014, 01:06:32 pm »
0
I've experienced some freeze/crash bug.I don't know if it's related to the patch.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline rustyspoon

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 794
  • Infamy: 164
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rustyspoon, Sir_Rusty_Of_Spoon, Rusty_the_Spoonarian
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #26 on: January 13, 2014, 01:07:04 pm »
+3
PS: Can you also explain the shield buff?

One thing you have to understand also is that the weight reduction of shields makes it easier to shield stun AND easier to crush through on shielders. My MW Long Maul is very, very happy.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #27 on: January 13, 2014, 01:11:00 pm »
0
Isn't that countered by the increased resistance of the shields?

Offline rustyspoon

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 794
  • Infamy: 164
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rustyspoon, Sir_Rusty_Of_Spoon, Rusty_the_Spoonarian
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #28 on: January 13, 2014, 01:29:22 pm »
+2
Isn't that countered by the increased resistance of the shields?

In my experience, no.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: 0.3.2.1
« Reply #29 on: January 13, 2014, 01:40:01 pm »
+3
Isn't that countered by the increased resistance of the shields?
not related to each other, so no.

Weight decrease on shields gets you faster of one spot, but doesn't increase max movement speed. I guess it would have a slight WPF/dmg influence but 1 kilo on the overall is nearly not noticable(at least not for me sofar). In comparison 1/5 of my shield weight gone has quite an influence onto chrushtrough, which compares the weight of the attacking weapon and the blocking shield|weapon and the str values of attacker and defender. I don't know the formula to calculate the chrushthrough, but that it is incooperated was my last information.

so yes same conclusion as rustyspoon, happy times for crushthrough weapons.

btw ... why do we still get hit when maul/mallet hits 3 feet away on the ground not visibly touching the target .. at all? Decrease hitboxes?
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future