Poll

I prefer

Battle
113 (48.9%)
Siege
118 (51.1%)

Total Members Voted: 230

Author Topic: Battle vs Siege  (Read 6199 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline polkafranzi

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 814
  • Infamy: 276
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • pronouns: Nick/her
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fun clan - Burg Krems, join with main or alt!
  • Game nicks: Adelheid, Wulfing, Hildebrand, Vulferam, Sepp, Pippa (r.i.p), Minjy
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2013, 03:23:52 pm »
+3
rageball
visitors can't see pics , please register or login



2024: selling my thirty odd +3 items for rl money, don't think i need them anymore tbh. pm me

Offline Zox_Fury

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 142
  • Infamy: 11
  • cRPG Player
  • La illaha il'Allah
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Zox_Fury
  • IRC nick: Zox_Fury
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2013, 03:25:57 pm »
0
I play battle 2% of my Crpg time .

I'm definitely too bad to enjoy battle time extension of respawn. The siege is lot of fun and delirious actions sometimes.Strategus is really cool too whatever siege or battle especially with Hetman as chief
Subhan'LLAH wa bihamdih

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2013, 03:26:15 pm »
+2
I prefer battle for many reasons, you typically are not limiting what classes and play styles are viable.  The main reason I prefer it, is that it's round based and you only have one life per round.  Everyone is on equal footing, and is just as important as the next guy.  You have one life to help your team the best you can. 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline musketer

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 213
  • Infamy: 120
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2013, 03:29:34 pm »
+5
(click to show/hide)

Offline Pinche

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 58
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2013, 03:31:43 pm »
0
The battle maps are retarded.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Bulzur

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 465
  • Infamy: 102
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild.
  • Game nicks: Guard_Bulzur
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #20 on: November 27, 2013, 03:52:13 pm »
+2
I prefer battle.

It usually allows me to read in between rounds, may it be the chat, or online reading.
No time wasted even while dead.
[14:36] <@chadz> when you login there is a message "your life as horse archer was too depressing for you. you decided to commit suicide. please create a new char"
[19:32] <@chadz> if(dave_ukr_is_in_server) then rain_chance = 98%;

Offline Umbra

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems, Freak Army of Gnjus
  • Game nicks: Umbra
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #21 on: November 27, 2013, 04:00:52 pm »
+3
Umad waradin?

Ahahahah this guy actualy went to my post history and took the time to downvote all my posts after i downvoted him here.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login







visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Molly

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1860
  • Infamy: 693
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • For the glorious Khorin...
  • Game nicks: Molly
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #22 on: November 27, 2013, 04:05:55 pm »
+2
I play mostly battle cuz you got one life and treasure it more...

...except there are those HA assholes rolling the server - then I play siege  :twisted:
When west germany annexed east germany, nobody moved a finger too.

Offline SirCymro_Crusader

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1095
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #23 on: November 27, 2013, 04:11:21 pm »
+1
I prefer battle because the maps are better but Teeth is slowly killing the maps leading us to no longer being able to defend the stairs :(

Offline korppis

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 404
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ninja
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #24 on: November 27, 2013, 04:28:40 pm »
+4
I used to play only battle, back when there were ladders and less ranged. It was fun when you still could go flanking around and try different routes (or make them!).

Now there's so much ranged that the only option to stay alive is to stay in one group, run serpentine from start to end to avoid getting shot.. and flanking is impossible unless you have 10 ath and shield. Battle lost all the creative stuff it used to have and what made it fun... so my vote goes for siege which I've been playing last year now.

Offline Penitent

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1389
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Penitent_Turtler
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #25 on: November 27, 2013, 04:49:21 pm »
+3
I prefer siege by a landslide, for many reasons.

I don't get as much time to play as I would like -- so when it's game time, IT'S GAME TIME. 
No playing for 2 mins, dying, and waiting 4 more minutes to play.  Fuck that, I want to play murder death kill fight and bite fight and bite!

I dont' have time to browse the forums or dick around on the internet when it's time to kill.  I do enough of that shit at work.

Other than that, I really like having an objective to focus on.  It's forces the team to work together.  Rambo-hero-rangers need not apply.  Get to the flag, fools! 

Offline Daniisme

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 66
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #26 on: November 27, 2013, 04:52:12 pm »
0
I preffered Battle sometime ago but EU4 got removed so I mainly play Siege.

The reason for that is simple, eu1 is not what it used to be, most of the rounds people runing around doing nothing till someone decides to start a fight/ getting shot/ slashed/stabbed by cav.

Offline karasu

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1751
  • Infamy: 316
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • D̶͎̳͒́͗͋ẹ͕̲̠̳̄̃͂ͤ͑ͮṃ̮͎̗̦̏̿͊ͤi̥̪̼͕ͦ̀̊̐ȗ̘rͩ͋̅̊gͭ̿̋
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #27 on: November 27, 2013, 04:52:22 pm »
+8
Siege.

I actually like to play and have fun, not hiding in fear of dieing or having to wait several minutes to have a chance again. A game mode that promotes camping isn't that fun.

Offline Oberyn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1578
  • Infamy: 538
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Lone Frog
  • Game nicks: Oberyn
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #28 on: November 27, 2013, 04:55:23 pm »
+6
I used to play only battle, back when there were ladders and less ranged. It was fun when you still could go flanking around and try different routes (or make them!).

Now there's so much ranged that the only option to stay alive is to stay in one group, run serpentine from start to end to avoid getting shot.. and flanking is impossible unless you have 10 ath and shield. Battle lost all the creative stuff it used to have and what made it fun... so my vote goes for siege which I've been playing last year now.

Never happened. Ladders coincided with the largest amount of ranged ever present in the game. No melee wasted time carrying ladders in case some xbow or archer happened to be camping 3 mins into the round. The only people that got a use out of them were ranged, camping otherwise unreachable spots. Suggesting that they were some kind of tactical buff for melee vs ranged is nonsensical.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Varadin

  • fite me irl
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 577
  • Infamy: 353
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Serbian
    • View Profile
    • http://steamcommunity.com/id/19930206800039/
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Varadin
  • IRC nick: Varadin
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #29 on: November 27, 2013, 04:59:51 pm »
+1
Umad waradin?

Ahahahah this guy actualy went to my post history and took the time to downvote all my posts after i downvoted him here.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Hardly, I would surly not waste my time downvoting all your pots, it would take me days to do that.
You are just pathetic for posting this lie and downvoting my aka totally normal post just cuse you have some hate apon me.

Don't like me ? just pass by bro ..
visitors can't see pics , please register or login