Poll

I prefer

Battle
113 (48.9%)
Siege
118 (51.1%)

Total Members Voted: 230

Author Topic: Battle vs Siege  (Read 6210 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Elindor

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1178
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Caelitus mihi vires
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Order of the Holy Guard
  • Game nicks: Elindor
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #30 on: November 27, 2013, 05:01:03 pm »
+1
I actually play a lot of both and like them both for different reasons.

Here's what I would say though if I had to pick one.


If there could be something that limits how long archers or HA/HX could just run around and hide and dick off after 90% of each team is dead and just spectating or watching midget porn...

...Then I might pick battle.  Otherwise, my pick would be siege.


I, like Penitent, work and have a lot of other things going on.  I don't get on to "oh when you die just dick off and browse the internet", I don't really have that kind of time luxury to waste and thats what it feels like - a waste.

While battle with one life can be intense, it can also be infuriating especially since most of the time one team is just getting curbstomped because of the balancer.  Believe it or not, I actually get into more good, 1v1(ish) duel type situations in siege.
Elindor, Archon of the Holy Guard
Holy Guard Thread :HERE
Banner Shop : HERE // Map Thread : HERE

Offline Gravoth_iii

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1454
  • Infamy: 341
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • \ [†] / ☼
    • View Profile
  • Faction: ▬▬ι═══════ﺤ
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_Gravoth, Prince_of_the_Land_of_Stench, Gravy, Igor_Boltsack
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #31 on: November 27, 2013, 05:02:55 pm »
+2
I prefer battle. When i go to siege expecting more action i actually dont notice that much of a difference, as attacker you have to constantly suicide push ladders, mindlessly attack gates or afk in siege towers for the first minutes or so. Then when you get in to the castle there are some fights finally but if you die you will have to run a long way to get there again. As defender you just sit in the castle for a long time waiting for people either to break the gate or if you get a good ladder position you can overhead spam some. You get some action, but boring shit.
While in battle sometimes i can die early and get a lengthy spawn, but then i can just tab down anyways. If i dont then there is action almost all the time and its on fair ground mostly. I die then i wait maybe 1 or 2 minutes, and then get right back in to the action.

tl;dr i feel the waiting times in battle are the same as in siege, but the action is more fun in battle.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2013, 05:05:59 pm by Gravoth_iii »
Paprika: ...the Internet and dreams are similar. They're areas where the repressed conscious mind escapes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXQSs1Qfcc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LW6y-kgKtA
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1364
  • Infamy: 1695
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #32 on: November 27, 2013, 05:04:10 pm »
+11
Siege. HRE/Grey rivalry is more interesting than Mercs/Byz clash.

Offline NuberT

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 436
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: NuberT_HRE
  • IRC nick: NuberT_HRE
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #33 on: November 27, 2013, 05:18:27 pm »
+1
Rage-quit factor on battle is too high for me, happens a lot that I rage-quit before I have spawned the first time, just watching that last HA or some other retardation :rolleyes:.

I also think my impact on winning or losing is a lot bigger in siege and I can actually make the difference there.

Offline bagge

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1056
  • Infamy: 275
  • cRPG Player
  • Duke of Poland
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: bagge
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #34 on: November 27, 2013, 05:20:17 pm »
+2
Battle is the best. Why? Cause I've been stuck attacking castles/towns since Strat 2. :cry:
I hope you guys get some sort of sticky balls deseases and smell like my armpits, sorry excusese for nolife fucking cunts you are.

Offline HUtH

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 94
  • Infamy: 28
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #35 on: November 27, 2013, 05:31:50 pm »
0
I like battle much more, no respawn makes it just better, also there are more classes to fight with, which is also better.
But I play siege too, few minutes before going to battle, because it's just pure mayhem, good for 'warm-up' or some half hour mindless fun, but longer play makes me tired.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Sorry
for
my
terrible
English

Offline Umbra

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems, Freak Army of Gnjus
  • Game nicks: Umbra
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #36 on: November 27, 2013, 05:39:59 pm »
0
Hardly, I would surly not waste my time downvoting all your pots, it would take me days to do that.
You are just pathetic for posting this lie and downvoting my aka totally normal post just cuse you have some hate apon me.

Don't like me ? just pass by bro ..

I downvoted your post because it didnt make any sense. Waiting for the round to finish implies dieing, how else would you wait for a round to end?
This is the first time i recall downvoting your post btw, so the notion of hating you for some reason is absurd.

(click to show/hide)

On topic: I rarely play on siege, i just got the impression that most of the time there is a clan steamrolling a pub. It could be that i just had bad luck or something but most of the time i lost. Tried to do objective/guard gates but most seem to care only about frags, the clans being the exceptions of course, hence why they win. It just lost its luster for me.

In battle i feel like i can make more of a difference, and you only get one shot at a round so imo the combat is more intense.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2013, 05:47:44 pm by Umbra »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Gravoth_iii

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1454
  • Infamy: 341
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • \ [†] / ☼
    • View Profile
  • Faction: ▬▬ι═══════ﺤ
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_Gravoth, Prince_of_the_Land_of_Stench, Gravy, Igor_Boltsack
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #37 on: November 27, 2013, 05:45:47 pm »
+3
(click to show/hide)

Lolwat, people actually get this upset by downvotes?
Paprika: ...the Internet and dreams are similar. They're areas where the repressed conscious mind escapes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXQSs1Qfcc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LW6y-kgKtA
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Berserkadin

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 592
  • Infamy: 145
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: -
  • Game nicks: Krewl_The_Urist_Fox
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #38 on: November 27, 2013, 05:59:14 pm »
+2
Siege, because I have fun there.

Also no rage from dying.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #39 on: November 27, 2013, 06:41:25 pm »
+1
The very goal of Battle mode is utterly stupid, therefore the only eligible candidate is siege.

Although when there are very few players left battle is probably better.

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #40 on: November 27, 2013, 06:49:26 pm »
0
The very goal of Battle mode is utterly stupid, therefore the only eligible candidate is siege.

Although when there are very few players left battle is probably better.


Fight for your bare life against bloodrhirsty foes is stupid? I beg to differ Sir :curls moustache:
And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #41 on: November 27, 2013, 06:50:37 pm »
0
After my vote, the poll was exactly at 60 votes vs 60. :)

Considering that both EU1 and EU2 are somewhat evenly populated most of the time, i think we can conclude that this discussion is meaningless as there can be no agreement on which is more important.

Offline Grumbs

  • طالبان
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1170
  • Infamy: 617
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #42 on: November 27, 2013, 06:52:40 pm »
0
I only really like battle, and anything I post on the forum about balance is geared towards that game mode

I like that dying matter so you have to be very careful with what you do, each decision can be important. Dying acts as kind of a punishment for screwing up for yourself and you feel bad for letting your team down. Also really like to have some time between rounds if I die just to take a break for a moment

I find siege is a bit too repetitive for me, I don't really care about the objective and feel the players around me just want to have some quick fights and then respawn and go back for more random fights. I lose interest fast in siege. If the respawning was slower or I felt people were really working together to win I could get into it more. There is just not enough punishment for dying
If you have ranged troubles use this:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Offline Spurdospera

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 315
  • Infamy: 20
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Spurdo...
  • IRC nick: Spurdo
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #43 on: November 27, 2013, 06:53:32 pm »
0
I like battle gamemode more because I feel that there is always potential for great tactics in field. Unlike in siege which I feel is just TDM where people just rush ahead to die and don´t give shit about any tactics.

Also in battle there´s much more variety of viable classes, in siege horsemen and pikers are pretty much useless when compared to str builds and 2h spammers.

Also Byz teamtactics <3
Quote from: Mortemer
spurdo is as useless as my hat.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Battle vs Siege
« Reply #44 on: November 27, 2013, 06:56:28 pm »
+1

Fight for your bare life against bloodrhirsty foes is stupid? I beg to differ Sir :curls moustache:

The goal of battle is not your own survival, it is to kill the last survivor of the enemy team before your team loses its own last survivor.