Just to note on this, idk how one could have any harm done to them by a taser, i have been trained with it, shot people with it, and have myself been shot with it. There is no harm that can be caused by it, anything you hear about it is little more then civilian propaganda for its removal since it seems nearly unethical in use. The taser causes no harm to a persons heart or brain whatsoever. The only harm that could be caused is done by you falling the hell over, which happens id say 9/10 times.
And yes quikclot is great, though expensive at nearly $50 a packet law enforcement and emergency services around the country use quikclot and other products that are similar on the public which most people do not know.
On another note,
im glad we could deepen the void between EU and NA, this was a great discussion.
I honestly do support the use and ownership of the taser, as long as it is for removing a physical danger. It is effective, efficient and not costly. However, it may cause cardiac dysrhythmia. It is not common and most of the cases, those who had such heart attacks had heart conditions, known or unknown to the person who got shot at. However, I would rather see criminals get shot at with a taser pin or a stun-gun, then a 9mm Hollow Point bullet. I will redirect you to the Wiki Page, which has citations for you to double-check, if you wish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser_safety_issuesIt can still kill you. But most of the times, it won't. And that is good enough, until they find something better.
And yes. QuikClot. Most of the times, GSWs cause internal bleeding. Bleeding that you have no way to stop. You can bandage lacerations. You can bandage blunt traumas that causes bleeding. But GSWs. No way. Not traditionally. But by pushing the damn QuikClot Gauze inside the wound; bam, the bleeding stops instantly. Applying it may be gross for many, as you need to push it inside an open wound, but man, if it saves him...
I stand my grounds. Yes, military / war industry creates so much that, what we use now directly or indirectly connected to its military use. However, if the Governments were sane (and not dependent on corporations) enough, we could also achieve the same thing, by investing R&Ds that are not related to arms manufacturing.