Poll

If you had to choose one, which would it be?

Iron Flesh
Weapon Mastery

Author Topic: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?  (Read 4387 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Royans

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 77
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #45 on: April 27, 2013, 10:17:28 pm »
+1
Does this thread even mean something?

Offline Prpavi

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1525
  • Infamy: 402
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 私 わ 変態 です
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Prpavi, Prpafeee
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #46 on: April 27, 2013, 10:21:38 pm »
0
always max out WM
And now he can't play because of "common sense" and he doesn't understand how this common sense works
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kaelaen

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 163
  • Infamy: 11
  • cRPG Player
  • Peasant
    • View Profile
    • H2O Kaelaen's Youtube Videos
  • Faction: Blandiloquent Rampallion Deutereagonists (BRD)
  • Game nicks: Kaelaen_BRD
  • IRC nick: Kaelaen
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #47 on: April 27, 2013, 11:50:18 pm »
0
I used to go weapon master first, but these days if I do a standard 18/21 build I'll max out iron flesh over weapon master.  This is because I remember when FCC was a bit more active about a year or so ago and Cyranule hadn't respecced to archery yet.  He had 130 proficiency in two-hander (to have proficiency in polearms), used the slow as fuck sword of war, and people screamed at him for being a spammer despite using a build and equipment with terrible stats for spamming.  This was because he had good footwork, timing, and understanding of weapon ranges, things I feel are all very important skills to master and if anything maximizing weapon proficiency feels just as much a crutch as maximizing iron flesh to me.

Both are maxxed out on my main but whenever I make skip the funs I always have low wpf because I like being able to live despite the presence of ranged players and teammates.  Fuck teammate, including myself.

-idlewind
-idlewind

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #48 on: April 27, 2013, 11:52:40 pm »
0
I prefer IF for the simple fact that there are so many ranged it makes me RQ with no or very little IF :P


that said i never go under 3 wm and usually have 5 :D

21-15 shielder 7IF 5 wm 18-18 6IF 5 wm so pretty close. only time i have 3 is for cav
« Last Edit: April 27, 2013, 11:56:30 pm by Osiris »
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline Torp

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 66
  • Infamy: 12
  • cRPG Player
  • Do evil to others before they do evil to you
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Kenkyaku
  • IRC nick: Torp
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #49 on: April 28, 2013, 12:30:34 am »
0
I always max wm - and then i fill in if when i'm done, usually 1-3 points depending on my build, more if i go for high lvl (33-ish) builds.
I know the actual damage and speed increase is very small, but i like the feel of being faster, it improves my feinting, it lets me get those quick stabs in etc. - for me its a question of surviving another hit from the enemy or getting in another hit or two yourself due to the superior speed.... and in that case, i prefer being more 'aggressive'

Offline Rhaelys

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 509
  • Infamy: 47
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: Rhaelys_BlockLeft_of_Chaos
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #50 on: April 28, 2013, 01:04:41 am »
+7
It's better to think about what people complain about more: Strength crutchers or Agility crutchers.

Oh wait, nobody EVER complains about Agility crutchers.

Why is that? Because Strength has access to Power Strike and Ironflesh, which directly improve the damage you deal and the damage you can take before dying. Agility has access to increased movement speed and marginally faster swings and slightly more damage, but still less compared to Power Strike.

Just remember folks, you can't swing your weapon faster if you're dead. Ironflesh directly increases your survivability, and thus allows you to swing your weapon at all.

For single prof melee only builds, Ironflesh first then Weapon Master. Also, no more than 8 skill points to attribute points conversions as Tydeus said.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Uumdi
sweet of you guys to celebrate my birthday
wait you're talking about that devils lettuce arent you, god damnit
Quote from: Kreczor
yo you want to burn some sweet romaine tonight?
Quote from: Uumdi
yeah i smoke that dirty green shit fuck iceberg

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #51 on: April 28, 2013, 01:16:47 am »
+1
The very best players of the agility "school" are very tough to kill because they block everything, which can be damn annoying at times. You just don't see many of them because a decent player with a STR build will do just as good during your typical round. Also good skills is closer to a consequence of high agi than a cause. Agility has many advantages but they only become useful with a lot of game practice.

Offline MrChubbikins

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 12
  • Infamy: 12
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Neku
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #52 on: April 28, 2013, 02:12:08 am »
0
Does WM make that much of a difference? With 24 strength, 8 PS, and 111 WPF, you do 45 average dmg with a 30 cut 1-hand. Now with 154 WPF you do a whole 3 more dmg.

I don't see why anyone other than archers would use WM.

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #53 on: April 28, 2013, 07:24:31 am »
0
The voting has done a 180, WM now surpasses IF. So, I suppose this thread does mean something.


Was not expecting it to turn around, will be interesting to check in on this periodically the next few days to see how the voting turns out once I'm sure most forum lurkers have seen it and cast their vote.
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline FRANK_THE_TANK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1312
  • Infamy: 339
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • FluckCucker
    • View Profile
  • Faction: A Free and proud Peasant of Fisdnar!!!
  • Game nicks: FRANK_THE_TANK
  • IRC nick: Sippy sip
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #54 on: April 28, 2013, 07:33:15 am »
+2
Bullshit and lies!

I still stand by my statement of clarification. It should say melee/nonhybrid only.
Fammi un pompino!

I think I have ball cancer in my right nut :(
Good news everybody! It's not nut cancer :)
Bad news everybody, I got dumped :(

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #55 on: April 28, 2013, 07:43:42 am »
0
Yes, I thought about that right around the 2nd page's time of arrival Tank. And I believe if I had specified then yes, the voting would probably be slightly different...but I gather from posts here that most players realize it is in reference to Melee. Perhaps just the looky-lous may bump WM's votes because they are ranged
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Rhaelys

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 509
  • Infamy: 47
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: Rhaelys_BlockLeft_of_Chaos
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #56 on: April 28, 2013, 09:09:39 am »
+3
It just amazes me how people can vote for Weapon Master and yet complain about Strength crutchers (more specifically complaining about how people with high Strength have high damage output and high survivability - a direct result of having points in Power Strike and Ironflesh). It could also be that I'm deluded in the belief that Ironflesh is a superior skill, or that I'm simply NA scum.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Uumdi
sweet of you guys to celebrate my birthday
wait you're talking about that devils lettuce arent you, god damnit
Quote from: Kreczor
yo you want to burn some sweet romaine tonight?
Quote from: Uumdi
yeah i smoke that dirty green shit fuck iceberg

Offline WITCHCRAFT

  • Highborn
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2174
  • Infamy: 227
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen
  • get hexed
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: WITCHCRAFT, A_Hot_Elf_Princess, Yurnero_of_the_High_Plains, and secret alts
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #57 on: April 28, 2013, 09:34:02 am »
0
Answer depends on your class. As a pure arbalest xbow (no melee wpf at all, just pure agi/ath/wm) I much prefered 10 WM to some WM and some IF. Run 'n gun someone then find cover to reload that arba as fast as humanly possible.

As a melee build (1h/shield, 2h, pole, pretty much everything) iron flesh is almost NEVER a bad investment. High HP stacks really well with high armor value that most melee prefer anyway. 2H and pole users can do quite well with high WM too. I sometimes like to set my STF character to a high wm and ath and duel with 2d polearms (halberd, english bill, those newer spear-variants). If you can combo quickly enough, two directions is all you need. Also hilarious for instantly guillotining horses and their riders after you rear them.

Of the two skills, I prefer high WM. In general I prefer speed-oriented builds and WM is all about that.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


irl something shorted on the shuttle and laika overheated and died within a few hours of liftoff and for a brief while one could look up to the stars and see a light shooting across the sky that was actually a warm dog corpse slingshoting about the earth at thousands of miles per hour which was arguably humanity's greatest achievement so far

Offline Rhaelys

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 509
  • Infamy: 47
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: Rhaelys_BlockLeft_of_Chaos
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #58 on: April 28, 2013, 09:36:41 am »
0
Answer depends on your class. As a pure arbalest xbow (no melee wpf at all, just pure agi/ath/wm) I much prefered 10 WM to some WM and some IF. Run 'n gun someone then find cover to reload that arba as fast as humanly possible.

As a melee build (1h/shield, 2h, pole, pretty much everything) iron flesh is almost NEVER a bad investment. High HP stacks really well with high armor value that most melee prefer anyway. 2H and pole users can do quite well with high WM too. I sometimes like to set my STF character to a high wm and ath and duel with 2d polearms (halberd, english bill, those newer spear-variants). If you can combo quickly enough, two directions is all you need. Also hilarious for instantly guillotining horses and their riders after you rear them.

Of the two skills, I prefer high WM. In general I prefer speed-oriented builds and WM is all about that.

This topic is about dedicated melee only.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Uumdi
sweet of you guys to celebrate my birthday
wait you're talking about that devils lettuce arent you, god damnit
Quote from: Kreczor
yo you want to burn some sweet romaine tonight?
Quote from: Uumdi
yeah i smoke that dirty green shit fuck iceberg

Offline Haboe

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1090
  • Infamy: 331
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Born with a shield on my back. Difficult birth.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Haboe
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #59 on: April 28, 2013, 10:14:31 am »
0
Yes Vibe, it is, and I feel that the answer is going to vary between US and EU somewhat--so that's why I asked.

And how exactly were you gonna seperate them in the results?  :rolleyes:  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login