Poll

If you had to choose one, which would it be?

Iron Flesh
Weapon Mastery

Author Topic: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?  (Read 4114 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« on: April 26, 2013, 07:41:31 pm »
0
As the Title suggests-- Iron Flesh versus Weapon Mastery.
Which do you choose?


Also, this is in regards to if you are a dedicated class, not a hybrid. Obviously if you're a hybrid, the answer would be Weapon Mastery. But I want to know from a Dedicated Class standpoint, which do you prefer? IF or WM? GET YOUR VOTES IN!
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2013, 07:42:05 pm »
+6
is this even a question

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2013, 07:42:34 pm »
+1
Yes Vibe, it is, and I feel that the answer is going to vary between US and EU somewhat--so that's why I asked.
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tydeus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1422
  • Infamy: 351
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Item re-unbalance guy
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Tydeus
  • IRC nick: Tydeus
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2013, 07:43:19 pm »
0
chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character

Offline Necrorave

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 609
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Who the fuck is this guy?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul
  • Game nicks: Necrorave and or Cheesus Crust
  • IRC nick: Necrorave
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2013, 07:44:07 pm »
0
Always been a fan of Weapon master.  Speed has always been first to me.  The best part is, I don't even spam

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2013, 07:46:21 pm »
0
I kind of want to know the formula for Ironflesh and Weapon Mastery. I think I've always undervalued WM a little bit, primarily because I just do one weapon proficiency, is it worth it to raise it from 110 to 130ish? and if so, why?
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2013, 07:46:49 pm »
+4
I'm hybrid, but if I was pure melee I'd still take WM over IF.  I prefer offensive skills versus defensive.

Pretty sure I'm in the minority though, I think most NA pure melee prefer IF over WM (and I think EU may lean more towards WM than IF, but still thinking the majority would take IF over WM, just not as much consensus)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2013, 07:47:34 pm »
+8
I prefer to have 5-6 WM as a dedicated melee player. Fuck ironflesh gayness.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Necrorave

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 609
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Who the fuck is this guy?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul
  • Game nicks: Necrorave and or Cheesus Crust
  • IRC nick: Necrorave
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2013, 07:49:00 pm »
0
I'm hybrid, but if I was pure melee I'd still take WM over IF.  I prefer offensive skills versus defensive.

I always considered myself a defensive person.  I figured that my defensive playstyle makes up for the lack of ironflesh so I put some into offense in case I need to be aggressive.  (Which I usually fail at)

Offline Chris_the_Animal

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 663
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Chris
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #9 on: April 26, 2013, 07:50:40 pm »
0
Almost on every build im finishing WM to its biggest...I want to make faster stabs with my lawlpike or aim better with my xbow. IF is better for people with unloomed stuff maybe...

Fuck ironflesh gayness.
Fuck your +3 Underwear!  :mrgreen:
Bros never die!

Offline Arjay

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: RJ
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #10 on: April 26, 2013, 07:52:18 pm »
0
I always choose WM over IF, it just feels like it was meant to be.

Offline Rainbow

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 167
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #11 on: April 26, 2013, 07:53:26 pm »
+3
I don't even know why this is a question.

Max out your IF in relation to your str and max out your WM in relation to your AGI.  They are both very important.

Power Strike has become an after thought. 

If you suck at blocking get more IF.  If you are a great blocker I would probably still have higher IF then WM but not by much.  I found the best build to be a 21/18 build w/ 7 PS IF and 6 WM ATHLETICS.

High damage is derived greatly from wep speed and footwork. 

I really dont even know why this is a question to be honest...  I would understand more IF VS PS or WM VS ATHLETICS
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tanken

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1463
  • Infamy: 395
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
  • Game nicks: Tanken
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #12 on: April 26, 2013, 07:56:14 pm »
0
I don't even know why this is a question.

Max out your IF in relation to your str and max out your WM in relation to your AGI.  They are both very important.

Power Strike has become an after thought. 

If you suck at blocking get more IF.  If you are a great blocker I would probably still have higher IF then WM but not by much.  I found the best build to be a 21/18 build w/ 7 PS IF and 6 WM ATHLETICS.

High damage is derived greatly from wep speed and footwork. 

I really dont even know why this is a question to be honest...  I would understand more IF VS PS or WM VS ATHLETICS

The reason it is a question is for new players and players who aren't sure. Also, in case you didn't read--The poll asks "If you had to choose one" meaning if you were min/maxing a build, say 21/21, which would you strive for first? IF or WM? It's a valid question, and I think we need to look beyond our personal bias of the question and realize that solid answers can help direct new players in to better understanding the choices of the skill leveling.
Below is a Collection of Finalists in my Design my Avatar contest -- They all did Awesome!
Thanks to all of those who contributed.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Rainbow

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 167
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #13 on: April 26, 2013, 07:57:54 pm »
+1
IF would probably be 1 higher then WM in the end build if thats the case.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline MrShine

  • Ragdoll Basher
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1156
  • Infamy: 193
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Fear the stache
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: MrShine
Re: A Great Debate: IF vs. WM -- What's your pick?
« Reply #14 on: April 26, 2013, 07:58:05 pm »
+7
Wow, I'm actually surprised there are so many fans of WM.  Leveling a shielder with 21 strength no ironflesh (56 hp) I get 2 hit pretty much all the time.  30 armor, 40 armor, 50 armor it doesn't really matter.

Meanwhile with my 70 hp 52 body armor main 2 hits are very rare, usually it's 3 or 4.

I'm all about the ironflesh, and I don't see that changing unless the base wpp you get changes.
Holy crap I have a youtube gaming channel! https://www.youtube.com/user/MrShine12345