As said earlier, the admins have free operation process, and that just creates polemics.
There should be a patern on how to punish a misacting cRPG'er.
Example:
-You tk or intentionally TK at the end of the round or whatever? You get warned.
-Second time, might it not be the same day, who cares, you get a kick, if you complain, you just get plain muted.
-3rd time, ban.
This might even seem a little to soft, maybe skip the first step. Cuz "just a warning" won't make the poor dead TKed guy feel like he's been avenged. If you have straight rules on how to act with troublemakers, then admin decisions should technically never be questionned.
Maybe we should try to elect admins ourself, at least it would be democratic. If we had the chance to vote on the admins, maybe these 2 guys wouldn't have been elected, who knows? There are plenty of active players on cRPG that definitely deserve to become admin. I personally think the shogunates -except George probably- would make good admins, they are always very fair and noble, although I'm not playin 24/7 so maybe I'm wrong?
PS: About Balton, why do you guys even bother reading his posts? Leave the guy, and he'll vanish by himself. Whenever I see he posted, I just ignore it and switch to the one right under. I only hope he won't post something interesting one day that I might miss, but I doubt about it... Oh, and also stop giving him -Awesomepoints, he's probably proud of them.