The problem is, how does this process of nomination + vote differentiate between:
1) Players who resent admins exercising authority over them (justified or not)
2) Players who want to see if the process will work, out of curiosity (cats)
3) Players who have no personal experience of bad-adminship, but want to side with their friends (tribalism)
4) Players who vote based on personal feelings toward an admin, not on the quality of their admin decisions
6) Players who are affected by rhetoric or persuasive posts from people with a vested interest in the results (political campaigning)
7) Players who don't have any experience of the admin's decisions and actions, but will vote in a poll if one is put up
8) Players who have actual experience of poor decisions made by an admin, and believe for good reasons that those decisions were not a momentary error, but will continue due to the nature of the particular admin.
I have a feeling that groups 1-7 are quite large, but group 8 is very small. Maybe I'm wrong