Poll

Are you satisfied with how shields in general are now?

No!
35 (23.6%)
Minor balancing needs to be done
46 (31.1%)
Yes, they are fine as is
67 (45.3%)

Total Members Voted: 148

Author Topic: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)  (Read 19041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dexxtaa

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1268
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remnant_Dexxtaa
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #150 on: February 11, 2011, 07:53:58 pm »
0
Wouldn't really change everyone from using the huscarl if shields in general were just heavier.  It'd still be the only decent one in the list.  Though it would help counter the crush through from the bar mace, so maybe not a bad idea.   :D

Extremely heavy shields.

I could do with a bit more indirect speed buff.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline EponiCo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 92
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Aine
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #151 on: February 11, 2011, 07:57:28 pm »
0
Nah, I disagree here.
The other shields aren't useless, I use them myself and am about as effective as with bec or axe.
They are to unforgiving on side hits imo and could get a slight buff in durability, but I had no problem if the best shields were just a little better than the heavy round. And I'm pretty sure there's some rebalancing with 2h weapons and polearms to be done also, that should benefit the nonhuscarls anyway (*cough* barmace *cough*). Of course if throwing is changed this would take away a good reason to take shield also.

Offline DrKronic

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 67
  • Infamy: 39
  • cRPG Player
  • Arch Villain of cRPG
    • View Profile
  • Faction: I do what I want
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #152 on: February 11, 2011, 08:06:56 pm »
0
Heavier shields.

I personally think the high cost bucklers should get a buff same with board shields because 12th to 16th century almost all forces that even used a shield were armed mostly with one or the other

More hp for steel shields bucklers should be fastest rated shields ingame and board shields should be faster than they are any level four and above shields should receive a buff

Its silly on my shielded if I want go fast I should be using quickbreak level three shields

Raise few a little on buckler but right now its expensive to wear one when u really have to direct the buckler block so weapons don't hit around it and of course you don't get the ranged defense that shields are known for

Add in the very high price and no one uses bucklers but in the 12-16 centuries sword and buckler fighting was very wide spread and effective in melee

I am only noting timeframe because devs mention that's the weapon/armor timeframe of cRPG
Greed is for amateurs...Chaos, Disorder, Anarchy now that's fun!

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1451
  • Infamy: 2605
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #153 on: February 11, 2011, 08:12:52 pm »
0
Steel Buckler looks like shit if you ask me.

Offline Elmetiacos

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • You've probably teamkilled me
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hot_Chick_with_a_Sword, Dark_Rose_Knight
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #154 on: February 11, 2011, 08:14:37 pm »
0
Or put your shield away, kill the most likely noob spammer, and move on. Just because you play a sword and boarder doesn't mean you never have to manual block.
So since you're convinced that a weapon's length and damage have little impact on the fight, I take it you always fight with a practice sword?
The word is "anyway" not "anyways". You are not Gabby Hayes.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Dexxtaa

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1268
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remnant_Dexxtaa
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #155 on: February 11, 2011, 08:24:16 pm »
0
My avatar looks like shit if you ask me.

fix'd
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline IG_Saint

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 196
  • Infamy: 20
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: IG
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #156 on: February 11, 2011, 08:29:09 pm »
0
So since you're convinced that a weapon's length and damage have little impact on the fight, I take it you always fight with a practice sword?

I never said that, I simply stated that fighting an axe user with a shield is ludicrous. Nice reading comprehension.

Offline Elmetiacos

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • You've probably teamkilled me
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hot_Chick_with_a_Sword, Dark_Rose_Knight
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #157 on: February 11, 2011, 08:54:52 pm »
0
I see, so you think I'd be better fighting with a one handed weapon and no shield than with the same weapon with a shield? Nurse!
The word is "anyway" not "anyways". You are not Gabby Hayes.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline IG_Saint

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 196
  • Infamy: 20
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: IG
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #158 on: February 11, 2011, 09:10:56 pm »
0
I see, so you think I'd be better fighting with a one handed weapon and no shield than with the same weapon with a shield? Nurse!

Against an axe, yes.

Offline EponiCo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 92
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Aine
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #159 on: February 11, 2011, 09:11:48 pm »
0
No you aren't.
But against an axe (read - weapon that is shorter or slower than a 1h in many cases) you are better served to put your shield away and conserve it for another fight.

Offline IG_Saint

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 196
  • Infamy: 20
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: IG
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #160 on: February 11, 2011, 09:23:43 pm »
0
No you aren't.
But against an axe (read - weapon that is shorter or slower than a 1h in many cases) you are better served to put your shield away and conserve it for another fight.

That's what I meant, yes, why waste your shield against a weapon that's designed to counter shields.

Offline Elmetiacos

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • You've probably teamkilled me
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hot_Chick_with_a_Sword, Dark_Rose_Knight
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #161 on: February 11, 2011, 10:05:13 pm »
0
Long Axe speed 93, length 115; Long War Axe speed 92 length 123; Great Long Axe speed 92, length 125. I'm not seeing the short, clumsy weapons you are.
The word is "anyway" not "anyways". You are not Gabby Hayes.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #162 on: February 11, 2011, 10:09:12 pm »
0
Long Axe speed 93, length 115; Long War Axe speed 92 length 123; Great Long Axe speed 92, length 125. I'm not seeing the short, clumsy weapons you are.

Count the -20-22 length because of the Polearm Grip.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Elmetiacos

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • You've probably teamkilled me
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hot_Chick_with_a_Sword, Dark_Rose_Knight
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #163 on: February 11, 2011, 10:19:01 pm »
0
Count the -20-22 length because of the Polearm Grip.
Allegedly. Also count the massive stun from trying to parry the axe with your Weight 1 sword.
The word is "anyway" not "anyways". You are not Gabby Hayes.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline IG_Saint

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 196
  • Infamy: 20
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: IG
Re: Round Shields...(Nerf thread)
« Reply #164 on: February 11, 2011, 10:28:40 pm »
0
Allegedly. Also count the massive stun from trying to parry the axe with your Weight 1 sword.

You act as if you have no chance on winning without your shield, so I'll refer you to the quote in my signature and bid you good day, sir.

I said good day!