Author Topic: Archers buffed too much  (Read 26543 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Havoco

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 538
  • Infamy: 102
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Hospookfans
  • Game nicks: Hospitaller_Havoc
  • IRC nick: Havoco
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #285 on: January 16, 2011, 04:59:01 am »
+1
True, however I think it would be pretty boring without ranged weapons. Ranged adds a whole new dynamic to the game. In fact what I liked most about the game when it came out was horse archery. I was so surprised when I found that out I had to try it. Then I found out I sucked at it and went foot archer. :)
In fact I love going to the middle in between the lines and watch all the ranged shit fly by. It looks epic. You can't really get that in most fps unless you play In slow motion.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 05:00:06 am by Havoco »
Pock gobblers

Offline SalmonGod

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 1
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #286 on: January 16, 2011, 06:06:58 am »
+1
I definitely don't want ranged combat removed from the game.  The chaotic environment it creates is indeed epic.

Offline StanleyPain

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 9
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: (>'.'<)(*)(*)(¯`·._) LLJK (¯`·._) (*)(*) (>'.'<)
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #287 on: January 16, 2011, 06:35:30 am »
+1

As Bruce said, if you want to play shooter, there are plenty of good games around, no need to turn this game in a ranged mod.


This is one of the more retarded comments I've seen in a while.


If you want to ride a pony, play my little pony online, you want to swing a sword, play rune, you want to do xxx play yyy....

Offline Ashrik

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LOTS AND LOTS OF JOLLY KNIGHTS LOTS AND LOTS OF JO
  • Game nicks: LLJK_Ashraa
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #288 on: January 16, 2011, 07:32:15 am »
+1
Based on that logic, there are other games you can play if you've imagined that Mount & Blade cRPG isn't the the melee paradise that you've invented it to be, based on your entirely make believe bullcrap.

e: This thread was better before this stupid "I like swords, so M&B is a sword game, plus swords are implied in the title, and thusly you should use swords too" idiocy came in.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 07:36:55 am by Ashrik »
I am Uhtred_III_of_Bebbanbawler.

I answer to no man.

Offline ShinySpoons

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 143
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: RS
  • Game nicks: AltOfSpoons
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #289 on: January 16, 2011, 08:04:11 am »
+1
Based on that logic, there are other games you can play if you've imagined that Mount & Blade cRPG isn't the the melee paradise that you've invented it to be, based on your entirely make believe bullcrap.


Except there isn't. Like...none.

Offline Ashrik

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LOTS AND LOTS OF JOLLY KNIGHTS LOTS AND LOTS OF JO
  • Game nicks: LLJK_Ashraa
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #290 on: January 16, 2011, 08:23:43 am »
+1
Except there isn't. Like...none.
Since the point is: "what you've said makes no sense since it is based on something you've dreamed up", the amount of games that fit his wet dream of M&B doesn't really matter.

I feel embarrassed for you for having to explain it :(
I am Uhtred_III_of_Bebbanbawler.

I answer to no man.

Offline 3ABP

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 34
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #291 on: January 16, 2011, 01:08:47 pm »
0
Strangely and funnily what some peoples (looking so) doesn't understand what if wipe out (totally) all ranged classes (like archers, crossbowmans, throwers (I hate you - throwers ^) ))...
then - yes. It will be PURE "Mount and blade", but no one will play this game. It will be not interesting (only few days and end).
              [STR] Strangers Faction
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Deathwind

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anarcho-syndicalism
  • Game nicks: Deathwind, Morsventus, Zelos
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #292 on: January 16, 2011, 01:11:09 pm »
+1
If you take out all the ranged classes, then who will kill the horsies?!

Offline Babelfish

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 62
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #293 on: January 16, 2011, 01:20:07 pm »
+1
If you take out all the ranged classes, then who will kill the horsies?!

Pikes?

Offline Kifli

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 10
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #294 on: January 16, 2011, 01:24:28 pm »
+1
Alright, first whine thread ever from me, but I think with the arrow damage input archers are too powerful. 8 damage with bodkin arrows, wtf? I think this is how it should be IMO:

(click to show/hide)

I want to take what you've taken your order to reach that conclusion

Offline Deathwind

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Anarcho-syndicalism
  • Game nicks: Deathwind, Morsventus, Zelos
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #295 on: January 16, 2011, 02:01:15 pm »
+1
I'd like to state that arrows only modify bow damage.

Offline Elmetiacos

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 175
  • Infamy: 45
  • cRPG Player
  • You've probably teamkilled me
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Hot_Chick_with_a_Sword, Dark_Rose_Knight
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #296 on: January 16, 2011, 02:02:34 pm »
+1
And by slightly too much. Only slightly. Archers probably were too weak before, but the proverbial pendulum has swung a bit too far back now.
The word is "anyway" not "anyways". You are not Gabby Hayes.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #297 on: January 16, 2011, 07:52:42 pm »
+1
Strangely and funnily what some peoples (looking so) doesn't understand what if wipe out (totally) all ranged classes (like archers, crossbowmans, throwers (I hate you - throwers ^) ))...
then - yes. It will be PURE "Mount and blade", but no one will play this game. It will be not interesting (only few days and end).

Lol... archers will hopefully adapt or quit. But melee fighters... I let you guess. Ask melee players around if they would like a "melee only" server to open.

Offline Rumblood

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1199
  • Infamy: 420
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GrannPappy
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #298 on: January 16, 2011, 09:00:58 pm »
0
Buff iron flesh to tone it down
"I don't think much of a man who is not wiser today than he was yesterday" – Abraham Lincoln

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Radix

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
  • I blind my enemies with pure awesomenes
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Radox_II
Re: Archers buffed too much
« Reply #299 on: January 16, 2011, 09:20:32 pm »
+1
I have played on server where there are or were the no ranged mondays, and it was boring + 2h spamzor in a huge clash of bodies.

 Actualy as a dedicated xbower I feel quite hurted, when I wear my plate and get a bolt and then an arrow, both take about the same dmg from me, so around 1/3 hp, the weaker bowmans take about 1/4 of my hp, but still they can send 3-4 arrows when I can send 1 bolt. And then throwers come, which fight in the first line and are very succesfull at stoping xbowers from reload. Anyways, I think bow dmg went a bit to high and xbows a bit to low, but its not like I cant play, still even when xbows are the worst ranged I can sometimes get to the first 3 so it is not that bad I gues.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 09:21:49 pm by Radix »