Personally, as far as I could follow the incidents from 2008-now, I think Obama had very very good rudiments.
For me it looks like he couldnt do a shit bcause he is somehow, does not really matter in which way, tributary to some ppl "above" him.
It really feels like he does some decisicions because ppl around him push him to it, I actually dont have enough proof for this.
What I want to say: For me, both are/would be very good presidents overall, just the presence (first black president/woman) makes the world a bit better somehow, even though they cant really change much, sadly.
I agree, she made some weird statements so far, but I think the world needs a world #1 woman, again, after Kleopatra.
that nose.....that nose m8....
1/ Cleo wasn't especially good looking, but since she was a sociopathic ruler noone argued when she said she was good looking. Anyway, thats besides the point.
You wrote 'ppl "above" him' and I like that you have seen that, so hard to explain to people that democracy as they think it exists cannot ever exist. Lets make an analogy:
You need a surgery, on your heart, so your life can continue, do you:
1/ Get someone who has trained for years for this, has lots of successful experience in heart surgery and is payed simply to save peoples lives... OR
2/ you hold auditions and select someone to operate on your heart based on the fact that they have been a janitor or a nurse for years and really really wants to try their ideas about heart surgery on a live patient? They will then operate on you for a few minutes, then you are gonna hold another audition for hospital personnel who want to be surgeons, and let
You pick 1, right? Get a proffesional who works at it fulltime, has been trained to do and has a lot of experience.
Same with running a country. If you want it to WORK you have professionals run it all the time.
The idea that voting, or who gets elected, will make any difference to who runs it and how your country is run is farcical at best, downright lunacy at worst.