Author Topic: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive  (Read 64913 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Golem

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 466
  • Infamy: 206
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: rektlessHEMPrincess
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #735 on: December 22, 2015, 08:16:11 pm »
0
I just wish someone made a competitive FPS other than CS, but everyone's too busy implementing p2w microstransactions and retarded gimmicks into their FPS games.
Try Squad or maybe that's not considered competitive.
This is about being straight out retarded. Children see in slow motion like owls.

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #736 on: December 22, 2015, 08:53:17 pm »
0
Try Squad or maybe that's not considered competitive.
Squad is pretty much the opposite of a competitive FPS. There's no shortage of "realistic" FPS games. And not saying they can't be good, but it's a very different style of game from competitive FPS.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline SixThumbs

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 60
  • cRPG Player
  • Consumer Whore
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #737 on: December 23, 2015, 01:42:19 pm »
0
Realistic is taking a shot (one shot) to your kevlar (if you're lucky to be square to the enemy and they're aiming for center mass) and falling down in extreme agony because you just took a tremendous amount of force to small point and your body armor cracked and broke a few ribs.
And how!

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #738 on: December 23, 2015, 01:44:03 pm »
0
Realistic is taking a shot (one shot) to your kevlar (if you're lucky to be square to the enemy and they're aiming for center mass) and falling down in extreme agony because you just took a tremendous amount of force to small point and your body armor cracked and broke a few ribs.
Nope.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline SixThumbs

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 60
  • cRPG Player
  • Consumer Whore
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #739 on: December 23, 2015, 01:49:20 pm »
0
You're right, realistic is cowering in a corner, frozen with fear as you question why you put yourself in this situation in the first place and all you want to do is go home.
And how!

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #740 on: December 24, 2015, 10:54:29 am »
0
You're right, realistic is cowering in a corner, frozen with fear as you question why you put yourself in this situation in the first place and all you want to do is go home.
If they make a SixThumbs edition, sure, but you can already roleplay that in any FPS game if you really want to.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #741 on: December 24, 2015, 11:09:09 am »
0
What they should do is make first shot accuracy 100%, lower recoil cooldown when firing in taps/short bursts and balance it by making a damage drop off over longer ranges, so that AK doesn't become the prefered weapon over AWP or something for the longest ranges (such as Dust 2 pit to A).

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #742 on: December 24, 2015, 12:31:42 pm »
0
It wouldn't. I know that's the argument everyone uses for it being inaccurate, but it's a retarded reason. AWP is 1 hit kill, with AK you'd have to hit one pixel headshots. And if someone CAN hit those... why shouldn't they be rewarded? Worse, why should they be rewarded with a headshot if their aim was OFF? The zoom and 1 hit kill from everything but legs already gives AWP a massive advantage over long range, making the AK actually hit where you aim wouldn't unbalance things.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #743 on: December 24, 2015, 01:10:36 pm »
0
The worst part is imo that M4A4/M4A1S doesn't one tap shit compared to AK47 :<
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline jtobiasm

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 567
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Tobi
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #744 on: December 24, 2015, 03:26:28 pm »
+1
The worst part is imo that M4A4/M4A1S doesn't one tap shit compared to AK47 :<
Thats because most maps are already CT sided.

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #745 on: December 25, 2015, 12:17:25 am »
0
It wouldn't. I know that's the argument everyone uses for it being inaccurate, but it's a retarded reason. AWP is 1 hit kill, with AK you'd have to hit one pixel headshots. And if someone CAN hit those... why shouldn't they be rewarded? Worse, why should they be rewarded with a headshot if their aim was OFF? The zoom and 1 hit kill from everything but legs already gives AWP a massive advantage over long range, making the AK actually hit where you aim wouldn't unbalance things.

I guess you're right. I actually dislike AWP a lot, 1 hit kill on pretty much the entire hitbox but the legs is bullshit. Honestly think the game would be better without AWP.

Offline Algarn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1230
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Algarn, Jorick
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #746 on: December 25, 2015, 01:25:39 am »
0
I guess you're right. I actually dislike AWP a lot, 1 hit kill on pretty much the entire hitbox but the legs is bullshit. Honestly think the game would be better without AWP.

The best part is when people ask for AWP nerfs on steam forums, and fanboys come there and say literally almost everytime something among these :

- git gud brah
- AWP is harder than AK/M4 playstyles, no matter what
- you're fucked when enemies pick up the AWP from somebody's corpse, therefore its strength makes its weakness.
- AWP is a top-tier gun that is breddy expensive, no need to nerf
- it's been like that for more than 10 years, so it musn't be changed.
- l2p m8 

Fanboys... fanboys never change.

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #747 on: December 25, 2015, 02:11:00 am »
0
Awp is good as it is, and i'm shit with it (more tha usal); it adds more tactics to the game.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Algarn

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1230
  • Infamy: 268
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Algarn, Jorick
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #748 on: December 25, 2015, 02:32:20 am »
0
Awp is good as it is, and i'm shit with it (more tha usal); it adds more tactics to the game.

I'm also bad (not only at AWPing, but whatever), but the AWP has a potential when used right, that anyone trying to peak an awp without flashing is going to get destroyed if the guy knows what he's doing.

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
« Reply #749 on: December 25, 2015, 11:00:50 am »
0
That's why the game is not about 5 people pushing hardly one spot, but people cooperating and using tactics to plant the bomb (allegedly). Using the awp is a risk, at proper levels missing a shot is a death sentence, plus it costs a lot and from closer range is ofc shit. Also it's not possible to use for quickscopes, there's a brief window where it's not 100 % accurate. Dunno after the nerf awp to me is pretty much balanced, but i might be wrong
visitors can't see pics , please register or login