Author Topic: Anti-Druzhina alliance  (Read 19748 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline buba

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 193
  • Infamy: 33
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Buba_theVagabond
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #150 on: May 20, 2014, 08:17:17 pm »
0
" and they totally made us paranoid"

"They didnt crate chaos for anyone out of UIF."

Wait what? :/

Offline Kalitorian

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 164
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: Kalitorian, Lerikalian, Torilerian
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #151 on: May 20, 2014, 08:26:47 pm »
0
Cicero and his clan BashiBazouk were part of the UIF.

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #152 on: May 20, 2014, 09:07:34 pm »
+2
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline GRANDMOM

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 920
  • Infamy: 140
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GRANDMOM
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #153 on: May 20, 2014, 10:12:20 pm »
+4
I'm sure somewhere deep inside you understand why GRANDMOM.

Like someone told me recently (I think it sums it up real nice), strategus never ends, not even between rounds, its only a pause between the same players who will continue what they were doing before.
We have to deal with it and try to "fix" it in our own way, or go with the flow, or do both  :wink:

How come you dont see the current strategus as an opportunity to do just that?

Your crusade was the first big war.
The second big war is coming and you can still do what you wanted to, you dont even have to manage a big ass alliance yourself, its already there and waiting for you.

Yes, I understand why but it was the biggest challenge so I had to try - we failed to unite enough clans, make people forget about past grudges and make them believe and trust in each other - and thats that

Strategus does end, all things end - this game is over, why because the UIF won it. No, they havent completely killed everyone on the map, but they are victors. Right now they are waiting for the opposition to get stronger so there will be some sort of fight, in my book when an adversary does that it means its over. If he can win but choses not to because he wants more out of it before killing his opponent it is over. The cat playing with the mouse before killing it.

There was an oppurtunity, when UIF wasnt as strong as it is now, and the gap between the two blocks was small - I am not in for playing a strategygame where my side of the team settles with just having some "fun" battles, or hoping to finish strat with one or two castles because the opponents cant be arsed to take them - and by holding them claiming some sort of "victory" for their clan.

The second "big" war will be a small war, over in a flash IF the UIF wants it to be, adding a tired Granny to it wont change that

Give me 30-40 guys that actually want to win the round, dedicated and active under the same banner - then we could start talking  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


We're working on something cooler than a blog.

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #154 on: May 20, 2014, 10:48:19 pm »
+1
The second "big" war will be a small war, over in a flash IF the UIF wants it to be.

I take the bets. Start showing the money!

Give me 30-40 guys that actually want to win the round, dedicated and active under the same banner - then we could start talking  :mrgreen:

You know what I think  :mrgreen:


visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Must be funny being in UIF and reading this thread  :P

Offline Cicero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 418
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
  • scourge of god
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: BashiBazouks_Cicero
  • IRC nick: Cicero
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #155 on: May 20, 2014, 10:56:05 pm »
+3
Must be funny being in UIF and reading this thread  :P

I can definitly tell you that they dont have fun in this strategus.

They are playing trade simulator.

Offline Harpag

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 914
  • Infamy: 263
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • jebać merców
    • View Profile
  • Faction: UIF
  • Game nicks: Harpag_the_Grey
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #156 on: May 20, 2014, 11:19:21 pm »
+1
Wataga - biggest pain in the ass ever!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #157 on: May 26, 2014, 01:48:45 pm »
0
I hope they geared the fiefs accordingly though  :)  50% of a victory in strategus is from logistic.

Nevermind.

Offline Kalitorian

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 164
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: Kalitorian, Lerikalian, Torilerian
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #158 on: May 26, 2014, 02:12:11 pm »
0
Nevermind.
Dramug and Radoghir are difficult to defend even if you have good EQ. So we decided to not waste too much EQ on those castles.
We have better EQ in Reyvadin, Curaw, Wercheg and Rindyar.

Offline Cicero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 418
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
  • scourge of god
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: BashiBazouks_Cicero
  • IRC nick: Cicero
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #159 on: May 26, 2014, 02:14:18 pm »
0
Give the amount of the gear , also where u gonna defend most and which side gonna be best for enemy.

Ah i was going to forget can you re take it if they capture ?

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #160 on: May 26, 2014, 03:09:02 pm »
0
I hope so Kalitorian, because I was feeling desesperate from a player point of view yesterday  :(

Are you sure those cities are better defense positions? On average (except for a few like Dhirim) castles are easier to control.
Anyway, lets continue to have as good rosters as we did !

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #161 on: May 26, 2014, 10:05:12 pm »
0
I hope so Kalitorian, because I was feeling desesperate from a player point of view yesterday  :(

Are you sure those cities are better defense positions? On average (except for a few like Dhirim) castles are easier to control.
Anyway, lets continue to have as good rosters as we did !

Tilbaut and Rindyar are the 2 most DEFENSIBLE FIEFS in the damn game. Dhirim is a pretty close contender for those, but Dhirim can be taken easily enough if you gear your army SPECIFICALLY with short weapons with high damage.

The two castles though, are on the other side of the shit to take. Gotta have enough ladders, catapults and seige gear to fund an assault on 3 other easier targets.

In our defenses of Tilbaut, the squids brought over 700 ladders in 4 battles and never really had enough. they went through 2 catapults in 1 siege and 3 in the fourth and were only able to get the wall in 1 siege down to half way. In the fourth siege the catapults didn't get a single shot off.

Rindyar is just as bad and you can put up some ladders blocking access to entire sections of the wall in one stroke. Catapults don't work due to tons of other shit and bad terrain.

Good luck taking Rindyar. it's a 2:1 k/d place easily. If it wasn't for the third siege, we did 2:1 except the third siege that they managed to pummel the wall down somewhat.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #162 on: May 27, 2014, 03:08:09 am »
-1
Dhirim can be taken easily enough if you gear your army SPECIFICALLY with short weapons with high damage.


That only works against AI or a player who sin't smart enough to do the same on defender's side and is usually short on mercs.  If defenders' have short weapons, especially crush-through and equal number of mercs - then its worse than both.  Often can't even use all the tickets because doorway is so slow to pass through.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline woody

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 407
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Woody, Weebo, Wreky
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #163 on: May 27, 2014, 01:33:18 pm »
+5
Too late.

Respect to UIF, they got better at every aspect of this game including battles than everyone else.

Embedded, bitter, personality issues and some people simply not interested in a 2 block war meant this was 1 strat too far.

Alot of the guys not in the UIF never realised that being cunning is often being very stupid.

Offline KaMiKaZe_JoE

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 904
  • Infamy: 117
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Cavalieres
  • Game nicks: KaMiKaZe _______
Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance
« Reply #164 on: May 27, 2014, 05:21:33 pm »
+8
Too late.

Respect to UIF, they got better at every aspect of this game including battles than everyone else.

Embedded, bitter, personality issues and some people simply not interested in a 2 block war meant this was 1 strat too far.

Alot of the guys not in the UIF never realised that being cunning is often being very stupid.

I propose that all of the NA clans unite and invade EU with the intent of crushing the UIF and liberating Strategus. We can be like those guys in Lord of the Rings at the end when they go to the bad place and make the big circle. We can do LoTR, but we can do it gayer.

We can do it gayer.

This will be our battle cry.
"I don't think I'd want to meet anyone from cRPG. Sorry no offense lol" -TG