Author Topic: Wolves point of view  (Read 14739 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rogue

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 332
  • Infamy: 31
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Margrave of Brandenburg
    • View Profile
    • HRE Forum
  • Faction: Holy Roman Empire
  • Game nicks: Rogue_HRE Harald_HRE Lodwig_HRE Egidius_HRE
  • IRC nick: Rogue_HRE
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #120 on: August 06, 2013, 04:07:51 pm »
+4
I still see that Mercs has still a lot of problem with the truth , so they still make up their own.
I'll tell you when all of this started.
It started (strategus 3) when mercs who were enemy came up with plan were Kinngrinn was supposed to betray us (Pecores , Camel and Templar), and Kinngrimm prentended to, but stood loyal to us.
Mercs hated Kinngrimm because he choosed to betray the betrayers and plotters , and to stand by his first a real alliance with us.
I''m glad to say i've played two strategus with the Wolf Clan , and they never tried to betray us nor scam us. Never seen such a loyal clan in the whole strategus thing...

PS: If you don't want people to attack you , you should avoid to shout "Shut the fuck up" to diplomat comming to your teamspeak. Your desastrous behavior is the reason you deserve all this.

That is not even close to what happened.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Sacrum Romanum Imperium

Offline Heibai

  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 438
  • Infamy: 33
  • cRPG Player
  • Traps aren't gay
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems I guess
  • Game nicks: Heibai
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #121 on: August 06, 2013, 08:59:12 pm »
+1
Maybe it's the influence of the Mercs side, but for some reason, I see the Wolves and especially the GO always as the "evil" one in Strategus. :s
Some of the people seems also unfriendly and meany, at least to me  :|

Are you?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


I hope you die IRL. What kind of fucking build is that?!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline vipere

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 793
  • Infamy: 73
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Byzantium
  • Game nicks: Lunasa
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #122 on: August 06, 2013, 09:09:03 pm »
+3
Maybe it's the influence of the Mercs Greys/Wolves side, but for some reason, I see the Wolves Apostates and especially the Go Mercs always as the "evil" one in Strategus. :s

Some of the people seems also unfriendly and meany, at least to me  :|

Quote
Are you?

Change few words and you have my point of view  :D

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Heibai

  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 438
  • Infamy: 33
  • cRPG Player
  • Traps aren't gay
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Krems I guess
  • Game nicks: Heibai
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #123 on: August 06, 2013, 09:10:41 pm »
+1
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
I hope you die IRL. What kind of fucking build is that?!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tuetensuppe

  • Event Manager
  • *
  • Renown: 1057
  • Infamy: 88
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tuetensuppe Tojtensoup_throwing_spoons Merc_cry_me_a_soup
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #124 on: August 07, 2013, 04:29:26 pm »
-1
I still see that Mercs has still a lot of problem with the truth , so they still make up their own.
I'll tell you when all of this started.
It started (strategus 3) when mercs who were enemy came up with plan were Kinngrinn was supposed to betray us (Pecores , Camel and Templar), and Kinngrimm prentended to, but stood loyal to us.
Mercs hated Kinngrimm because he choosed to betray the betrayers and plotters , and to stand by his first a real alliance with us.
I''m glad to say i've played two strategus with the Wolf Clan , and they never tried to betray us nor scam us. Never seen such a loyal clan in the whole strategus thing...

PS: If you don't want people to attack you , you should avoid to shout "Shut the fuck up" to diplomat comming to your teamspeak. Your desastrous behavior is the reason you deserve all this.

as a former elder of the wolves i have to say that you got a nice fable there or as roque said it

That is not even close to what happened.

and for grandmom:
(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: August 07, 2013, 04:36:46 pm by Tuetensuppe »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Gnjus
yes thats the problem, no more nice clans, everyone acts like theyre the real thing but all are just greedy backstabbing arrogant sons of bitches

Offline KingBread

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 445
  • Infamy: 42
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen
  • Game nicks: KingBread
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #125 on: August 07, 2013, 05:17:41 pm »
0
nice essay 6/10 would unban but pls be nice in future.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #126 on: August 07, 2013, 08:41:17 pm »
0
That is not even close to what happened.
I like that version more^^
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline Cosmos_Shielder

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 137
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player
  • French Connection Leader
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Pecores
  • Game nicks: Roland De Gilead
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #127 on: August 08, 2013, 12:23:14 am »
0
well maybe you have not seen everything tuetensuppe. Because merc never planned to have us (pecores ) in the desert . It was supposed to be kappikulu Nord , and HRE north in kedelke and Zagush. :D .... I still remember their claim map. From my point of view Kinngrimm sticked to what he promised us , and never betrayed us. and weren't you a Cotgs at this time?
remember this http://i.cubeupload.com/7Jfz9u.png  ?
when everyone arranged with the other to get their claim unclaimed , and when we templar , wolves and pecores weren't invited to it?
When we kicked kapikulu , hre , and all the unwanted from that area?
« Last Edit: August 08, 2013, 12:32:16 am by Cosmos_Shielder »

Offline Tyr_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 445
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player
  • Suum cuique
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Tyr; Merc_Nemo; Caesar_Salad
  • IRC nick: Tyr_
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #128 on: August 08, 2013, 12:41:33 am »
0
Em, what you dont seem to know is that the map which you just posted got created before the next strat round started and it just shows the territorys that clans claimed for themselves in their diplomacy thread before strat?
Also this is not even the finished maps, union claims are missing, the territories we claime overlapped. Also 22nd claims arent in. There wasnt much arranging with other clan at this time.
I can only repeat myself, you seem to have not the slightest idea of what was going on^^.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #129 on: August 08, 2013, 12:52:46 am »
+3
To deny that some factions (mercs included) conspired to turn Kinngrimm against those he had an agreement with is false. However its ridiculous for people to call upon events that occurred over a year ago to justify petty squabbles now.

The simple truth is that both sides are rather petty and unable to take responsibility for their own mistakes.
Turtles

Offline GRANDMOM

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 920
  • Infamy: 140
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: GRANDMOM
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #130 on: August 08, 2013, 07:38:39 am »
+1
Not that it matters to me that much, but its interessting to see the different view of this. And also, since this seem to be one of many reasons for the current situation in strat its fun to hear about.

And Teuten, I can say that Kinny has confirmed this, invited to a plot against his alliance (templar and so on) he went along with it and then betrayed the plotters but stayed true to his alliance with templars. Some will say he is lying, however, I believe him.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


We're working on something cooler than a blog.

Offline Cosmos_Shielder

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 137
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player
  • French Connection Leader
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Pecores
  • Game nicks: Roland De Gilead
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #131 on: August 08, 2013, 12:25:11 pm »
0
Em, what you dont seem to know is that the map which you just posted got created before the next strat round started and it just shows the territorys that clans claimed for themselves in their diplomacy thread before strat?
Also this is not even the finished maps, union claims are missing, the territories we claime overlapped. Also 22nd claims arent in. There wasnt much arranging with other clan at this time.
I can only repeat myself, you seem to have not the slightest idea of what was going on^^.
there wasn't much arranging really? That's why every other claim didn't get contester excepted ours ? :D
What a real candide guy you are :D
You think i don't know what happened , because you only know what you've seen on the forum. I was leader of pecores and i had to do diplomacy at least one hour a day , and sometimes i could stay 4 hours talking with kinngrimm. I even had access to some confidential google docs were mercs and hre and their plann with kinngrimm . But if you still want to believe to the forum version , it's up to you :)
You hate kinngrimm because when you wanted  to plot to turn him against his real alliance , he decided to spy on you , because he refused to plot with his enemy :D .

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #132 on: August 08, 2013, 01:45:48 pm »
0
well maybe you have not seen everything tuetensuppe. Because merc never planned to have us (pecores ) in the desert . It was supposed to be kappikulu Nord , and HRE north in kedelke and Zagush. :D .... I still remember their claim map. From my point of view Kinngrimm sticked to what he promised us , and never betrayed us. and weren't you a Cotgs at this time?
remember this http://i.cubeupload.com/7Jfz9u.png  ?
when everyone arranged with the other to get their claim unclaimed , and when we templar , wolves and pecores weren't invited to it?
When we kicked kapikulu , hre , and all the unwanted from that area?

That map is my map, it was just a map of rumors & what people claimed said in the thread from last strategus. (Or was it one before that?)

Nords, Kapikulu, Pecores, Templars never claimed theirs however during that time, this was just rumors iirc.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2013, 02:01:41 pm by Thovex »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Cosmos_Shielder

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 137
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player
  • French Connection Leader
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Pecores
  • Game nicks: Roland De Gilead
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #133 on: August 08, 2013, 02:49:22 pm »
0
how could it be that templars and pecores didn't claim but wolves did? We were an alliance , the desert alliance,  our claim were the same

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: Wolves point of view
« Reply #134 on: August 08, 2013, 03:02:09 pm »
0
I don't give a shit about what happened, I doubt Wolves claimed their shit either back then but it's old so I don't remember and I don't care.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login