Author Topic: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)  (Read 3447 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Knitler

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 456
  • Infamy: 91
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Worlds Cutest Dictator
    • View Profile
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #45 on: September 13, 2013, 07:51:34 pm »
+1
Instructions weren't clear enough, i got my dick caught in the ceiling fan

Is it dead now :/?
(click to show/hide)

Offline Flans

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 143
  • Infamy: 147
  • cRPG Player
  • I come to eat you at night
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmar
  • Game nicks: Kalmarunion_Odysseus
  • IRC nick: Flans
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #46 on: September 13, 2013, 10:48:18 pm »
+1


We're just gonna end up talking about how we did this and that back then :\ what we should be doing is making fun matches now with whats left of the Apostates tickets, theyre gonna be wiped anyways, so might as well go out banging.
they've repeatedly said they don't care about strat all over the place now, so lower em and let us get to the main attraction inside those mountains :)
I wanted an avatar as cool as the Nords ones, but I have no skill with Photoshop, or Illustrator or anything like that >:(

Offline Bittersteel

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 919
  • Infamy: 199
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Burg Créme
  • Game nicks: Tybalt_von_Krems, Lennart_Bladh
  • IRC nick: Bittersteel
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #47 on: September 13, 2013, 11:20:41 pm »
+2
Is it dead now :/?


Yes. I'll have someone over tomorrow to fix the fan.

Offline Knitler

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 456
  • Infamy: 91
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Worlds Cutest Dictator
    • View Profile
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #48 on: September 14, 2013, 09:57:51 am »
0

We're just gonna end up talking about how we did this and that back then :\ what we should be doing is making fun matches now with whats left of the Apostates tickets, theyre gonna be wiped anyways, so might as well go out banging.
they've repeatedly said they don't care about strat all over the place now, so lower em and let us get to the main attraction inside those mountains :)

Thats not the "War on Apostates" Thread, its the "Decrasing fief´s army for attacks" Thread ....
(click to show/hide)

Offline Jack1

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 231
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jack1_, Abbud_Amari, The_Doc, Gottlob_Kohlman
  • IRC nick: Risen_Jack
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #49 on: September 14, 2013, 12:18:15 pm »
0
i got my dick caught in the ceiling fan

How does one manage...
We're all nerds here, so it doesn't really matter.

Offline Butan

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1713
  • Infamy: 214
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Best tincan EU
    • View Profile
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #50 on: September 28, 2013, 04:04:55 pm »
+1
I wanted to say GG;


In one month the garrisonning almost stagnated, so numerous were the battles and loss on every side.



25 August :
(click to show/hide)


28 September :
(click to show/hide)


Some agreed to planned sieges to not force the others to waste troops but; there also was a lot of pretty audacious attacks, completely ignoring the "wasted" troops over 2k-2k5 waves. It was even quite beneficial to those who took the risk since most of those audacious attacks ended before the siege was completely depleted of troops (captured troops!).


Those 2 images are also interesting to compare who got completely wiped out and who conquered a lot, in terms of fiefs and regarrisoning of newly conquered fiefs.



If not only the greys and druzhina (and some others, like wolves) were out on the field completely going balls to the wall, we could even see a DECREASE IN OVERALL WORLDWIDE TROOPS  :o   shocking news!
« Last Edit: September 28, 2013, 08:49:22 pm by Butan »

Offline Erasmas

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The crows had come
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Erasmas_the_Grey
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #51 on: September 28, 2013, 07:28:10 pm »
0
Some agreed to planned sieges to not force the others to waste troops but; there also was a lot of pretty audacious attacks, completely ignoring the "wasted" troops over 2k-2k5 waves.

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5276

3rd siege. Have fun guys  :D
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #52 on: September 28, 2013, 08:36:37 pm »
0
I've never...6k troops!?
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5277

That's way more than what i'd waste. Shit, I'd just let you stack that much. We could have 3 nice battles with that 6k troops, rather than 1 battle.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Vermilion

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 208
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Vermilion
  • IRC nick: Vermilion
Re: Decreasing fief's army for attacks - the Battles Conclave (OPEN)
« Reply #53 on: September 28, 2013, 10:44:52 pm »
0
I've never...6k troops!?
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=5277

That's way more than what i'd waste. Shit, I'd just let you stack that much. We could have 3 nice battles with that 6k troops, rather than 1 battle.

Big risk = Big reward

Gaining 12000 troops and a castle!




I wanted to say GG;

In one month the garrisonning almost stagnated, so numerous were the battles and loss on every side.

(click to show/hide)

There has been lots of troop usage which is always good!!
Still amazing that the troop number has still managed to rise though... A lot of people still generating troops, and lots of them.

-----

Also good to see Coalition are being fair with their "stacking" Rindyar Castle has been consistently returned to 6k army, would have been very easy for them to have just put a few 1000's of troops in.  :)