Yay, I'm done being muted.
Is this really news to you? Glitching and treachery is fine and funny until it happens to them. Though even Saxton's treachery wasn't near this level, I can't help but feel like this was inevitable with someone like smooth and badplayer (surprised they weren't banned permanently for the first incident) in your faction.
I have to say that I respect this boldness and fully expect it to happen to other clans who are only concerned with amassing as many people as they can, regardless of trust issues. It's all about standards, and when you're FCC and have none, then this kind of issue is bound to happen. May this serve as a lesson to all of us.
It is the same level, stop being an anti-fcc nerd when it comes to rules.
__________________________
Right, but you guys don't have a claim to the castle. You accepted a known griefer to your faction, who later gets permabanned, and then say they broke the treaty.
You are literally not looking at this like an actual person.
I'll admit this was a shitty thing to happen to you, and I'd be pissed it it happened to my faction, but,
I'd like to see more things like this happen more often in this game of strategus. More drama & intrigue.
LL didn't hand over the fief, gear, and troops so why should the FCC? Doesn't this create more drama and intrigue, or do you only mean when the FCC is the victim?
________________________
Next week strat could end and it would be like none of this stuff existed. It is a web-browser game that has been restarted three times in two years. It is not based on skill at all, it is about farming better gear, more troops, and being strength builds. There is very little strategy in battle and almost no organized squads or formations. It is just blobs attacking other blobs while people throw ladders on top of things so ranged can shoot into the blobs, every once in a while you'll get morningbumpstar'd by a heavy cav.
