Author Topic: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich  (Read 5471 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Smoothrich

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1558
  • Infamy: 986
  • cRPG Player
  • #manup @bigplays
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #45 on: February 23, 2013, 11:27:37 pm »
This is true, Smoothrich thought it was going to be a fief transfer.. so right there is Smooth breaking the rules, allowing a fief transfer to happen like this.

No, he said he was making a new faction, and would try to get people to join him because of the looming threat from FCC, those were the terms he plainly laid out.  The "transfer" was always to a new faction with new leadership that I wasn't very interested in, but didn't feel like fighting an unfun battle against out of esoteric strat rules obligations that I need to hire 60 people to spawn with no gear and waste thousands of troops and equipment for no reason.  I said "good luck man" and he went on to do his own thing.

Anyways I'm done defending myself.  I surrendered the city to a dude who was friendly but wanted to start his own faction and had an army around to attack, and referred to it as "transfer" because I wasn't interested in defending it because of the bugged gear and wanting to step down from Strat leadership bullshit in the first place.  The third party's plan sizzled out due to threats from both sides of a war and lack of support from inside his old faction.

If that's against the rules then Globally Ban me, whatever, I don't really care what happens to my Strat stuff since I was using it as an excuse to stop playing (as a faction leader) in the first place.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2013, 11:33:55 pm by Smoothrich »
My posting is like a katana folded 1000 times to perfection.. and the community is what keeps the edge sharp.. and bloody.  -  Me.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Sandersson Jankins

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1450
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CSA Apologists
  • Game nicks: fnord
  • IRC nick: "There's always a bigger nerd"- Qui-Gong Jim, Star Trek IV: Electric Boogalo
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #46 on: February 23, 2013, 11:34:10 pm »
Whatever, I am done. Smoothrich and zilla don't have the balls to admit what they did and nothing I say will ever change that. Time to sit back and hope the devs will take a look.

lol

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

the administrator of this forum is the Internet Keyboard man? Can only play "authority" in the virtual world?Can you tell me why?

Offline ROHYPNOL

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 361
  • Infamy: 127
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Poor Washing Machine
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #47 on: February 23, 2013, 11:54:56 pm »
This whole topic is totally bogus. I created SEMENstorm faction in strat to try and get rid of some of the random players we had in the faction, and so I could get more people in SEMENstorm to join the strat faction that was actually in the clan also. Blackzilla was trying to do his own thing, which was explained to be wrong what he was doing considering we gave him a lot of stuff he had. He wanted peace with everyone, which is fine, but he did not like the whole Hero Party faction because of what happened to it from the start. I explained to him it won't be the same, so he joined me. I made the SEMENstorm faction and invited him to join, it has nothing to do with all this nonsense. Thanks
Quote from: Jeade
you're rough around the edges.
This is the reason people don't like you if anyone ever did.

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #48 on: February 24, 2013, 12:45:17 am »
They should be banned for using dev chat logs to win strat. :lol:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #49 on: February 24, 2013, 01:38:45 am »
I used to think my cat was cool, then it died :/
cats suck dogs are better.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline Notoriety

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 1
  • Infamy: 3
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #50 on: February 24, 2013, 01:42:54 am »
Sure seems like a bunch of he said she said but in the end the fief was transferred illegally. why they won't admit it is beyond this thread, hope some justice is found. Both need perma bans from strat.

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #51 on: February 24, 2013, 01:56:01 am »
Sure seems like a bunch of he said she said but in the end the fief was transferred illegally. why they won't admit it is beyond this thread, hope some justice is found. Both need perma bans from strat.

You're mistaken, Blackzilla did admit it earlier in this thread.
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Segd

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 845
  • Infamy: 88
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #52 on: February 24, 2013, 02:07:27 am »
I found the rule for you, guys:
http://forum.meleegaming.com/strategus-issues/what-happened-in-tosdhar/msg647236/#msg647236
Quote from: cmp
It would be better if all transfers were done with the transfer fief function, regardless of whether the fief is gonna be attacked or not.
In this case, however, that wasn't possible (since the fief owner is banned), so reclaiming the village by attacking it is perfectly legitimate. Furthermore, there was no enemy army nearby and "it was coming" (when?) is not a valid excuse.

So basically, if this is true:
I don't recall saying that, but I do recall saying that Smooth and I will honor duel, why does it matter. The only player you had left to attack the fief within a 24 hour time limit wouldve been vick. Who was banned, so I didnt delay shit. Are you afraid now that if you do attack ahmerrad, youll have to fight a fair battle?

then all you disputes about cheating, rebellion, SS, threats from Occitain & other shit that I didn't even want to read don't worth a penny.

If there was enemy army ready for attack, then its delaying(but I didn't see any FCC attacks on Ahmerrad after transfer). If not than it was 100% legit.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2013, 02:12:24 am by Segd »

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #53 on: February 24, 2013, 02:16:09 am »
We had plenty of people within 24 hours.

Murder was near with 1200 troops
Blondkhan was in the fief
TuTu was hidden close ready to attack if needed
Akira was also in the city (She was banned... without proof and found innocent)
Vick with 2200 troops (banned without proof and found innocent and unbanned)



Leader of BS

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #54 on: February 24, 2013, 02:24:43 am »
I found the rule for you, guys:
http://forum.meleegaming.com/strategus-issues/what-happened-in-tosdhar/msg647236/#msg647236
So basically, if this is true:
then all you disputes about cheating, rebellion, SS, threats from Occitain & other shit that I didn't even want to read don't worth a penny.

If there was enemy army ready for attack, then its delaying(but I didn't see any FCC attacks on Ahmerrad after transfer). If not than it was 100% legit.

Although I don't like to give out our strategus info, the information is now a few days old and will not cause much damage.  I was also within the fief in the next 24 hour having just cross back over from the EU border.  Not only that but Blondekhan had his battle to teleport Smoothrich yet again and returned to the city just a few hours after your attack.  Blackzilla, you can't see our entire faction, obviously and you couldn't even see the inhabitants of Ahmerrad either, or you would have known that Holith was there and ready as well.
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #55 on: February 24, 2013, 02:31:43 am »
Kesh's explanation for why didn't attack it after the fief transfer: Kesh: "its like poker, we just had the pot emptied out into the oppsing player's pocket after the turn by cheating, ruining the pot odds in going all in, so we are waiting to see if the dealer will do anything about the cheater as the other players who folded the hand are favoring the cheater simply becasue they like him better"

Offline Snickers

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 95
  • Infamy: 31
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #56 on: February 24, 2013, 04:37:59 am »
http://forum.meleegaming.com/strategus-issues/what-happened-in-tosdhar/msg647236/#msg647236

"Since the fief owner is banned"

Was he banned? No. He just left his castle. He was on the map somewhere. Just because he decided he wanted to leave his castle, it does not mean you can do a illegal transfer. He has to travel back to the castle if he wanted to do anything with it. That is the rule.

« Last Edit: February 24, 2013, 05:50:56 am by Snickers »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Arathian

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 650
  • Infamy: 175
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Pick it up you white ass cracka
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Frisians
  • Game nicks: Arathian, schizophrenic_axe_murderer
Re: request Ban for Blackzilla and Smoothrich
« Reply #57 on: February 24, 2013, 05:17:21 am »
"Since the fief owner is banned"

Was he banned? No. He just left his castle. He was on the map somewhere. Just because he decided he wanted to leave his castle, it does not mean you can do a illegal transfer. He has to travel back to the castle if he wanted to do anything with it. That is the rule.

Man i hate these threads. All these post filled with blatant bullshit by arrogant bigots.

This is just in, Smoothrich is like einstein, literally.

Literally.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login