Author Topic: Operation: Durquba Freedom  (Read 12279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Inglorious

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 497
  • Infamy: 39
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • Courage is our shield
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Banana Republic / Chevaliers
  • Game nicks: IngloriouslyBad / Affordable Cavalry
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #75 on: November 15, 2012, 12:03:53 pm »
+4
I am wondering why Hospitallers would agree to this. Aren't they allied to Chevaliers, or are they currently just friendly with no official bonds? I've said plenty of bad things about Hospitallers, but I've always respected them for sticking to their contractual word. This round of Strategus has strained that respect. If there is an official alliance, how can they sign another deal stating they will not help their ally?

We are not allied is that reason. Always will have respect for Hospitaller though for jumpstarting us into strategus, without all the trolling the other clans give when asking questions about strategus (Though every faction has it's its gracious members & its trolly polly's)


I'm glad all the bickering stopped in this thread though. (sorry to ruin the fun, but the drama does indeed get old [welcome to strategus right?  :mrgreen: ]) We'll honor the attempts of making all fights prime time so everyone can join in the fun, and put up the most valiant defense effort the world has seen. One for the Guinness books. You dig?

Offline Gristle

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 560
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BRD
  • Game nicks: Gristle_BRD
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #76 on: November 15, 2012, 01:11:08 pm »
0
I see. Thank you for clarifying.

Offline Spanish

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 386
  • Infamy: 106
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 2h Cav Star of the year award winner.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The official Drama Llama of Knights_Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: Hospitaller_Spaniard, BowPersona, Span
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #77 on: November 15, 2012, 05:05:39 pm »
0
Still waiting for FCC to get all crazy on VE for attacking such a small clan after all the shit we got for fighting with hero party. Well anyways good luck to both sides, look foward to fun brattles!




My horse is named pebbles and we like to try.

Offline Hobb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 96
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #78 on: November 15, 2012, 06:14:07 pm »
0
Hmm maybe you should make peace with them so they can?
« Last Edit: November 15, 2012, 08:21:38 pm by Hobb »

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #79 on: November 15, 2012, 08:44:25 pm »
+2
Pretty sure a portion of fcc does not care for the odds in this war between such different sized nations. I among them. I am also pretty sure VE does not care nor should they
Leader of BS

Offline raccoonlord

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • HoC_Raccoon
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HoC
  • Game nicks: HoC_Funesti_Equites, HoC_HeavyHitter_Monty, AND MANY MORE!!!
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #80 on: November 15, 2012, 10:53:49 pm »
+1
In my opinion if a faction, "Faction A", consistently fights against another faction, "Faction B", in strategus battle, then why should "Faction B" not consider "Faction A" an enemy? A lot of factions have people signed up for both sides, which makes it okay. But then again some factions constantly sign up against certain other factions. This once again is just my opinion and I do not speak on behalf of anyone else.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline ildist

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 414
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
  • hehexd
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS, THE MATES
  • Game nicks: Ildist_of_Chaos
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #81 on: November 15, 2012, 11:08:34 pm »
+1
REST IN PEACE CHEVALIERS
Malaclypse: now every time I eat them I think about her that girl's snatch
Malaclypse: it tortures me
That Guy: wat

Offline Hobb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 96
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #82 on: November 15, 2012, 11:09:36 pm »
+5
Yeah its one of those things that you think is a problem until you see the negative side effects of it.

Ex. Chaos taking their fiefs in S3, some of them had 2 or less defense because of this "mercs mean hostility" way of thinking. Something I know tkov leadership has went over many times this strat is to ignore this because it is proven to kill the game.

I would say this strat has been a lot better but I still feel way to many people think that mercing against you is a serious thing.

Fallen is the only clan that ever comes to try to get mercs from our ts, we usually have a good number of players ob daily

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #83 on: November 15, 2012, 11:16:41 pm »
+5
fcc way.. Merc for whoever you want. If one side or the other gets mad about. it Tough shit. Only time we require members to merc on one side is for our fights. otherwise they can do whatever they want.

I will say tho if we fight 10 fights and 100% of the people on the other team are the same factions each time we might get a little salty.
Leader of BS

Offline Boss_Awesome

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 338
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
  • I am the Kwisatz Haderach
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Fallen Brigade (Not the Coalition)
  • Game nicks: Boss_Awesome
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #84 on: November 15, 2012, 11:27:46 pm »
+2
Yeah its one of those things that you think is a problem until you see the negative side effects of it.

Ex. Chaos taking their fiefs in S3, some of them had 2 or less defense because of this "mercs mean hostility" way of thinking. Something I know tkov leadership has went over many times this strat is to ignore this because it is proven to kill the game.

I would say this strat has been a lot better but I still feel way to many people think that mercing against you is a serious thing.

Fallen is the only clan that ever comes to try to get mercs from our ts, we usually have a good number of players ob daily

I couldn't agree more.  There is nothing more disheartening than losing a fight that otherwise could have been won simply because of lack of mercs.  Strategus battles are a lot of fun, and the big ones are basically community events kind of like going to cRPG Prom.  Getting a full roster in the big battles hasn't been a problem, though, even for an apparently unpopular clan.  I think this is a good sign that a lot of folks are coming around and not looking at mercing too seriously.  Just think of mercing as getting a chance to take part in a battle in the role of a soldier for the faction that you applied for.  That is how strat is meant to function. 

Offline Weewum

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 159
  • Infamy: 124
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #85 on: November 15, 2012, 11:39:47 pm »
0
REST IN PEACE CHEVALIERS
Chevaliers will survive this, Inglorious knows what he's doing, and they have KUTT, Hospergler and Astralis as mercs.

Offline oprah_winfrey

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 808
  • Infamy: 196
  • cRPG Player
  • Now look under your seat...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: JABONRA
  • Game nicks: Egan
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #86 on: November 15, 2012, 11:54:39 pm »
0
I liked hoplite better anyway.

Offline Kirbyy

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 286
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player
  • Hi guys
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Malta 4 lyfe.
  • Game nicks: Kirby, ynyng
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #87 on: November 16, 2012, 01:24:31 am »
0
I expect some fun battles in the future!  Premium time too! 


*sorry for the off topic* love how I get all my posts -1'd from Arcuyus, (Illdst) because I -1'd one post.


Edit: Hahahah apparently my infamy disappears on command!
« Last Edit: November 16, 2012, 03:58:57 am by LookItsMountNBladeMan »

Offline ildist

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 414
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
  • hehexd
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS, THE MATES
  • Game nicks: Ildist_of_Chaos
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #88 on: November 16, 2012, 03:33:19 am »
+2
So untrue, i -1'd one of your posts because techno is filthy

Edit: you guys are both blue, the same shades of blue i can't tell which one is which
« Last Edit: November 16, 2012, 03:46:17 am by Arcuyus »
Malaclypse: now every time I eat them I think about her that girl's snatch
Malaclypse: it tortures me
That Guy: wat

Offline Syls

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 168
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Kingdom of Veluca
  • Game nicks: Syls
Re: Operation: Durquba Freedom
« Reply #89 on: November 16, 2012, 04:31:19 am »
+2
Edit: you guys are both blue, the same shades of blue i can't tell which one is which

Damn, you've just found the real reason why we're attacking them  :mrgreen:. There's only one clan that can be blue on this map!