NA or EU? Who's better?

[Gnjus]

I do think though that the NA servers win the award for "Highest number of egotistical players," they do have more of those then EU, certainly.

Not sure about who does all these "hall of fame", "who is better", "who is best archer/xbower/etc" threads most, americans or europeans ? Probably EU, right ? 

[Rhade]

Not trying to be mean, man.  Just being honest, I really havent noticed you guys on the servers.  You are welcome to do clan battles with equal number of fighters, its been done before, quite fun, usually first team to 3 wins.  Not a bad way to get your name out there and get some recognition.  I was kind of curious about your page length write-up on goretooth, seems like you haven't been playing very long and already have massive critiques of administrators from your limited experience and are being cocky about your clan's skills, might want to show some humility, goes a long way to getting respect as a confident, competent fighter, maybe take a cue from some great but humble fighters like oberyn, manofwar and cyranule.

I know Goretooth just fine, and took everything I needed to know from the fact at hand. Opinions aren't important when there are facts aplenty to be had. I am humble, but I'm also honest, and when you've never in your clan's long history lost a single scrim or match and you win 99% of the duel tournaments you enter, I think that it's safe to give your honest opinion that your clan is pretty good.

I'm really not looking to make this into a BkS thread, but you saying "hey man they aren't that good" just because you haven't seen us much doesn't say a lot when a lot of people have. I don't see why you jump on someone for giving their opinion.

[Cyclopsided]

BkS are pretty decent players, I just don't think you are as special as you think here in Crpg. In native you certainly do your NA Native stuff well.
You guys are certainly skilled in duels. I haven't seen any teamwork though. You fit perfectly in with everyone else in NA .

[Rhade]

BkS are pretty decent players, I just don't think you are as special as you think here in Crpg. In native you certainly do your NA Native stuff well.
You guys are certainly skilled in duels. I haven't seen any teamwork though. You fit perfectly in with everyone else in NA .

We don't do RP shieldwalls or shit like that, but we get shit done just fine together, actually.

"Teamwork" isn't just getting in vent and saying "CAVALRY FLANK LEFT, FORM A SHIELD WALL." etc etc. We play very well together and our cohesion is extremely efficient.

Don't you play on EU servers, anyway?

[Cyclopsided]

We don't do RP shieldwalls or shit like that, but we get shit done just fine together, actually.

"Teamwork" isn't just getting in vent and saying "CAVALRY FLANK LEFT, FORM A SHIELD WALL." etc etc. We play very well together and our cohesion is extremely efficient.

I said nothing about forming shield walls and such. They are good in certain scenarios though. I'd actually like to play with you guys some time.

[Rhade]

tbh, I like EU's admin system 100% better.

Our servers feel like the Third Reich, and there's not a damn thing we can do about it besides watch the admins abuse their power. Even if it's blatantly obvious and we post about it, nothing happens whatsoever.

[Goretooth]

15v15 sounds good to me.

[gazda]

i've played on na only twice (and thats before patch 0.2) so i cant really judge

[Leiknir]

I don't know why, but the NA community feels "younger", leading to more stupid discussions on the server and more general asshattery leading to even angrier admins. Maybe it's because even though eu guys are the same age, most eu-kiddies can't speak english yet and keep silent.

[[ptx]]

Haha, that sure helps

But on-topic, EU > NA. By far.

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Spawny]

NA is better. On EU we have the Turks (Kapikulu). Some players have some skill, but I'm not going near any of them in battles or sieges. I always get teamhit/killed when I do.

[Paul]

Aussie is best.

[Hirlok]

Oh and if some rich person like that exists, just put the money to hosting quality less leggy servers . I can't play NA servers past 60-70 players since they get so laggy, both in server lag and the ping rising tons.

Not going into the general flaming of this thread at all, but technically the EU servers indeed SEEM to be better.
I have terrible ping on both, since I live in Paraguay (220-280 on NA siege, about 50-80 MORE on EU Siege servers), but usually experience less lag on EU servers despite of my higher ping there.

So it would be cool, if someone could analyze what the issues are, post detailed and clear specs (technically and financially) of what we would need to improve the situation, and then take action. I am not rich, but would happily donate a few bucks per month to get a faster server.

[Beauchamp]

the only difference i spotted is people raging about archers (especialy those that play it smart) way more on NA than on EU (and when i say raging, i mean really RAGING - votekick polls, constant bitching in chat, teamwounding...).

[Blondin]

And one more who got the biggest e-peen thread...