Author Topic: Next strategus  (Read 12226 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1373
  • Infamy: 2389
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #30 on: July 14, 2012, 02:24:56 pm »
-2
Once a cheater, always a cheater. And thanks to okiN, Nordmen are friends of cheaters.


Offline BlueKnight

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 983
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • If you run, you will only die tired...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #31 on: July 14, 2012, 02:26:42 pm »
+4
Once a cheater, always a cheater. And thanks to okiN, Nordmen are friends of cheaters.
I regret I started discussing with you but once again tell me who and when cheats. Who are our cheating friends? Proves and names please.

GIVE AT LEAST 1 NAME.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Skyrim UI

Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #32 on: July 14, 2012, 02:28:13 pm »
0
lol just stop, ALL OF YOU
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline BlueKnight

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 983
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • If you run, you will only die tired...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2012, 02:29:41 pm »
0
Wait Rebel, I want to hear who is cheating.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Skyrim UI

Offline Joker86

  • Mad & Bad
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1226
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player
  • Why so serious?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Companions
  • Game nicks: Joker86_TP
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2012, 02:43:11 pm »
+2
  • Saracens/Arab armour suggestion: not a single word of anyone responsible we have no one responsible for that. it's something that has been planned for a long time, but was never put into practice. just like many other things, our resources are limited
  • Latest Strategus drama: not a single word to the accusations and the plans on handling them both cmp and me stated that we look into it before we can do any proper response. in what way is that "not a single word"?
  • Banner purge: people get there slot deleted w/o really knowing why: not every player is just too stupid to read, maybe there is something not optimal in the way those warnings are displayed it's a new system and we still need time to figure out how to deal with it. it's a beta, after all

in my opinion, all of your points are invalid.

In mine they are not.

1.: You already implemented suggested stuff before. Who finally implemented it? Who decided those items are acceptable? And even if this person doesn't want to/can't do that again, there is still the possibility of a developer saying that there is a topic in the developer forum or something like that about the suggestion, and that it's being discussed. Someone made the effort to make a topic, other people made the effort to post on this, some people really put their hopes into it, so I think it's the least to honour this with an answer... by any developer.

2.: You did not state it. cmp just said that Panos had a valid point but ruined it (which rather sounds like "your point became invalid"), and you stated that "it's a difficult matter" and you are thinking about a system to prevent it in future. Which could also be understood like "I don't want to judge this time". Then cmp wrote that ironic post in italics, where he only says "because we didn't say anything people assume we are not going to do anything about it", which a) still doesn't really tell people that you will punish the particular players, and b) the people are totally right to assume this! What should they assume else? Believe that everything will be right... probably, eventually... ?

3.: If you don't have a system yet, it's perhaps recommendable to be a little bit more lenient to the people. Deleting a banner and telling them afterwards that it didn't meet the requirements is not a nice style, I would say. And perhaps not all people who lost their slots deserved it.


What happened to this idea? What is with Leiknir?

You seriously need some kind of community manager (I suggest ToD  :lol: ) whose task is to check the forum for interesting, valid threads, ask the proper developers for a quick answer, and post it in the proper thread, so that people don't feel ignored by the developers 99% of the time.

And you need a new system for the suggestion area. Perhaps I will post an idea for this. But not in the suggestion area.  :lol:
Joker makes a very good point.
î saved for eternety (without context  :mrgreen:)

Offline Corwin

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 499
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Corwin_the_Lazy
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #35 on: July 14, 2012, 02:47:31 pm »
-3
Btw, if anyone cares, there are already several Greys accepted by AI to defend Derchios from their allies. Namely:  Kalp_the_Godfather,  Enning_sokol_The_Grey, Rantrex, Nogu_The_Grey.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

« Last Edit: July 14, 2012, 02:59:24 pm by Corwin »
I mean, what have you got to lose? You know, you come from nothing, you're going back to nothing, what have you lost? Nothing!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Dalhi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 415
  • Infamy: 39
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Dalhi
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2012, 02:57:54 pm »
+1
Btw, if anyone cares, there are already several Greys accepted by AI to defend Derchios from their allies. Namely:  Enning_sokol_The_Grey,  Enning_sokol_The_Grey, Rantrex, Nogu_The_Grey.

And they are same guys that I've seen playing for AI in last few battles against Bashi/DRZ/Union/GO, so either they are morons or just probably like Rantrex (who doesn't use a tag for quite some time) are not active in strategus/TS, also knowing Hetman and Harpag does makes me think that even if whose guys left GO they were to lazy to remove them from faction. Back when I was in GO we had about 30-40% memebers that were complitly inactive for weeks but still noone even thought about removing them from roster as like it happened many times they might come back to playing one day. Get some other hobby instead of organising witch hunting  :rolleyes:

Offline LordBerenger

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1492
  • Infamy: 859
  • cRPG Player
  • Jesus is the savior of Earth
    • View Profile
    • .........
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #37 on: July 14, 2012, 03:00:57 pm »
-2
In strat 2.0, LLJK owned whatever gimmick clan most of the devs were in pretty bad and led to their coalition of the LLJK hating to fall apart around them, leaving Okin and friends stranded to wither away at LLJK's endless manpower assaults, effectively wiping them out of the game and leaving them to recruit in fallen lands for nearly 4 months of abject inactivity until that strat ended.

Of course, while LLJK was fighting for our existence against at least 5 EU clans that attacked us without provocation (including the devs), our accounts were constantly being hijacked, our armies being deposited into AI castles by people accessing our leadership's accounts, our rosters before most important battles were being completely deleted of most players minutes before they would start depriving 50+ people of a fun match we spent hours preparing for every time.. it was almost as if someone with dev or strat admin level access to the game were going out of their way to cause LLJK (and ONLY us, no one else had these problems) to lose a war..

RIP BEST CLAN EVER!

Also,   OKIN AND HARPAG SITTING IN A TREE, K.I.S.S.I.N.G!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Corwin

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 499
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Corwin_the_Lazy
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #38 on: July 14, 2012, 03:01:52 pm »
-2
But wouldn't you agree that it would be better if this sort of things wouldn't happen, at least in order to avoid accusations about cheating?
I mean, what have you got to lose? You know, you come from nothing, you're going back to nothing, what have you lost? Nothing!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #39 on: July 14, 2012, 03:02:18 pm »
+1
Btw, if anyone cares, there are already several Greys accepted by AI to defend Derchios from their allies. Namely:  Kalp_the_Godfather,  Enning_sokol_The_Grey, Rantrex, Nogu_The_Grey.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

EU_cRPG_3   Siege   12/07/2012 14:46   Druzhinaa:650no survivors   Derchios Castlea:780s:181k:599   10:2

Problem ?

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline Nessaj

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1399
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ▃ ▅ ▅ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇
    • View Profile
    • Vanguard
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Vanguard_Cooties
  • IRC nick: Nessaj
Leave Okin Alone
« Reply #40 on: July 14, 2012, 03:07:19 pm »
0
LEAVE OKIN ALONE!!! LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Things don't exist simply because you believe in them, thus sayeth the almighty creature in the sky!

Offline Dalhi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 415
  • Infamy: 39
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Dalhi
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2012, 03:09:01 pm »
+3
But wouldn't you agree that it would be better if this sort of things wouldn't happen, at least in order to avoid accusations about cheating?

As long as they are doing nothing wrong noone should care on wich side they play, it's quite epic experience gain from whose sieges so if they do not have a chance to get in roster for attackers they probably sign up for defenders or for both just in case. I also know that Harpag and other GO leaders always repeat to not to sign up against their allied factions, there even channel with descrpition on TS just for that matter. There are some conditions to get accepted for old UIF factions battles like presence in TS some time before battle, not everyone can make it, and most probably yours accustation is last thing they care about.

Offline Gnjus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1831
  • Infamy: 397
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Siktir git, pislik okçu.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Turklings
Re: Leave Okin Alone
« Reply #42 on: July 14, 2012, 03:11:41 pm »
+1
LEAVE OKIN ALONE!!! LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


I'm not worried about okin at all because I imagine that he's somewhere up there in the frozen wastes of Finland all bundled up in his cabin smiling at us, something like this:
(click to show/hide)
Do you honestly think you have any sort of moral authority, Reyiz? Go genocide some more armenians and deny it ever happened, please, and stay in the middle east.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline okiN

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 924
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #43 on: July 14, 2012, 03:15:06 pm »
0
It's an apartment building in sunny downtown Helsinki, but yeah, pretty much.
Don't.

Offline Lansamur

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 232
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Lansamur, The_Prisoner,Beer_Storage, Carebear_Ravenei
  • IRC nick: Lansamur
Re: Next strategus
« Reply #44 on: July 14, 2012, 03:17:51 pm »
+3
Welcome to cRPG, where malenerds with female avatars start rumormills bigger than those in Sex and the City, Proof isn't necessary for any decision as long as you got favors to call in and of course the whole devcrew is corrupt and cheating to further their clan's goals.

Leshma, pls delete your account and leave us alone. You'd do us all a great service. Shitthread is shit and beer will always remain banned at some point, cause that's how cRPG works. Can't have a MP-game without a scapegoat after all.
[22:17] <@chadz> congratz cmpxchg8b, you managed to put 995 errors into the item sheet!
[22:17] <@cmpxchg8b> epic winning
[22:17] <@cmpxchg8b> beat that Fasader