I want the option, as a commander of one of my own battles, to choose between more than one character of the guy applying for my battle. I would like to see this when I look at the applicants:
Grandmom shielder lvl 34
Grandmom HA lvl 28
Grandmom Pole lvl 18
I can choose anyone I want for my roster. The applicant can choose what kind of characters he wants me too choose from, but at least 3 I think at the most 6. The applicant can also choose not to level up any other character except the one he wants to play, I would then see this:
Grandmom shielder lvl 34
Grandmom HS lvl 1
Grandmom Pole lvl 1
I would then ofc choose the shielder, but this could also limit the chances for the applicant to get accepted for the battle.
What would this change do with the game?
1. More diversity in armygear - you could make an all cav army for instance, just make sure ypu have the gear for it
2. Give the commander the choice to make an army that suits the target he is attacking
3. Give the commander the ability to surprise the enemy he is attacking:
- enemy has a all cav army and you know it - make acounter army of poles and archers only.
- enemy has choosen to have almost only archer gear in a castle, well fuck him I have 1500 shields in my 1500 man army.
4. More gear would be loomed in strat
5. Different typesof armies would roam the lands
6. More fun for people in battles, since different tactics would need to be used
7. More open field battles
8. Possibility to win battles due to what gear and what mercs you choose and prechosen tactics when building the army
9. Not one type of openfield battles but more difference
10. Harder to defend settlements since you never know what kind of army will attack, and that attacking army could be built just to counter whatever you have in terms of gear inside.
11. Intel of enemy armies would be more useful, "know your enemy" and adapt
Sorry if I said several things twice - writing from asmartphone and cant really scroll and see what I have written
Poll