Author Topic: From the original barmace crusher  (Read 6824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #45 on: February 14, 2011, 11:25:55 pm »
0
That was the crappiest tie-in to a topic I've ever seen, Siiem. Cmpxmy old friend already said that Barmace will have crushthrough removed, /thread.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Siiem

  • Heretic
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 611
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #46 on: February 14, 2011, 11:27:29 pm »
0
That was the crappiest tie-in to a topic I've ever seen, Siiem. Cmpxmy old friend already said that Barmace will have crushthrough removed, /thread.

So you and Mok do have an affair... WELL WE ARE DONE. OVER.

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #47 on: February 14, 2011, 11:30:36 pm »
0
Stop spamming, man.

Barmace will still be a cool weapon that dosent afraid of anything when it only has knockdown.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline IG_Saint

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 196
  • Infamy: 20
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: IG
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #48 on: February 14, 2011, 11:33:10 pm »
0
Stop spamming, man.

Barmace will still be a cool weapon that dosent afraid of anything when it only has knockdown.

I'd go practice some more before those tests if I were you.

Offline SquishMitten

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 132
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Waylander
  • Game nicks: Mew, Kitty + many more
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #49 on: February 14, 2011, 11:35:26 pm »
0
I'd go practice some more before those tests if I were you.

Troll points! Troll points for everyone!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

In memory of Merciless_Mew, member of Merciless, ruler of Istiniar

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #50 on: February 14, 2011, 11:36:02 pm »
0
I'd go practice some more before those tests if I were you.
Indeed, so would i.

Well, actually i wouldn't, but you definitely should!

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #51 on: February 14, 2011, 11:46:10 pm »
0
Indeed, so would i.

Well, actually i wouldn't, but you definitely should!

Stop spamming, dude.

And I wouldn't talk mr. pTx "gramur" lastnamehere.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Banok

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 521
  • Infamy: 215
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #52 on: February 15, 2011, 12:58:20 am »
0
well for a start without crush through bar mace is vastly in-superior to the long iron mace (no stab), so that at very least needs looking in to since before the lack of stab didn't matter.

other mauls are only really effective vs shielders who are noob or occupied fighting other enemies. and it sucks having to carry a 9 weight weapon as a secondary.

bonus vs shield weaps are the only way to go now I guess even tho its not a counter to 180 degree INVINCIBILITY it simply means they get less time in that mode.

I suggest "bonus vs shield" added to barmace like with morning star. even tho it will be in-superior to the poleaxe which has more range, a horse owning stab and is "balanced".

@lisa and co, how could I play crusher? because I got sick of losing to turtles even though I manual block 10+ of their attacks and all they do is hold RMB and win. I play everything even turtles (turtle prolly most boring class). I dont understand personally how anyone could play the same char all the time, even a ninja gets boring.

PS: I give crushers a bad name atm because I seem to have forgotten how to play.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2011, 01:00:52 am by Banok »

Offline Babelfish

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 62
  • Infamy: 27
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #53 on: February 15, 2011, 01:06:25 am »
0
@lisa and co, how could I play crusher? because I got sick of losing to turtles even though I manual block 10+ of their attacks and all they do is hold RMB and win. I play everything even turtles (turtle prolly most boring class). I dont understand personally how anyone could play the same char all the time, even a ninja gets boring.

PS: I give crushers a bad name atm because I seem to have forgotten how to play.

Sorry, i was raging at some turk crush-through guy when i wrote the post, did not mean to be that harsh. But i do find the weapon and the crush-t very lame from my duelists point of view.

Got alts and native when i get bored of my ninja character, been some time since ive played crush-through tho. Atm i have my ninja, archer and turtle:p

Offline Ghazan

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 2
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Ghazan_of_Karakorum
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #54 on: February 15, 2011, 02:18:34 am »
0
Meh, its only really powerful in siege mode anyways and who takes siege mode seriously? 

Oh, I know.  The people who spent all their heirloom points on the barmace and wear full plate so they can stand at the top of the stairs and crush through on peasants   :lol:

Offline EponiCo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 92
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Aine
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #55 on: February 15, 2011, 03:08:02 am »
0
Heirloomed Barmace. 5 PS, 180 WPF. 92 speed. 24 agility. Not more to say really.

Offline Gorath

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 226
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
  • Why the hell did I do anything other than ranged?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: The threat of physical violence should be present in all things
  • IRC nick: Otherwise we get a swarm of faggot children like the majority of the cRPG/Internet population
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #56 on: February 15, 2011, 04:14:03 am »
0
well for a start without crush through bar mace is vastly in-superior to the long iron mace (no stab), so that at very least needs looking in to since before the lack of stab didn't matter.

other mauls are only really effective vs shielders who are noob or occupied fighting other enemies. and it sucks having to carry a 9 weight weapon as a secondary.

bonus vs shield weaps are the only way to go now I guess even tho its not a counter to 180 degree INVINCIBILITY it simply means they get less time in that mode.

I suggest "bonus vs shield" added to barmace like with morning star. even tho it will be in-superior to the poleaxe which has more range, a horse owning stab and is "balanced".

@lisa and co, how could I play crusher? because I got sick of losing to turtles even though I manual block 10+ of their attacks and all they do is hold RMB and win. I play everything even turtles (turtle prolly most boring class). I dont understand personally how anyone could play the same char all the time, even a ninja gets boring.

PS: I give crushers a bad name atm because I seem to have forgotten how to play.

I love how everyone just hates that shields actually shield people.  It's such a travesty that shields shield shielders.
And I should be nice or polite to anyone.... why exactly?

Offline MountedRhader

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 222
  • Infamy: 89
  • cRPG Player
  • Farewell, I am free
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #57 on: February 15, 2011, 04:19:13 am »
0
I usually whine more often then not, but shields do just what they're supposed to. Perfectly balanced I'd say.
Throwers however are the most op things I have ever seen on cRPG :c (above statement)
« Last Edit: February 15, 2011, 04:23:43 am by TheDashingRogue »

Offline NoSBoH

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 7
  • Infamy: 19
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: From the original barmace crusher
« Reply #58 on: February 16, 2011, 06:49:04 pm »
0
Sorry but using 2h blunt requires you to be good overhead strikers that's it!  Sooooo cheap, don't be proud of using this style.  Gimp it!