2H vs Polearm

[Gurnisson]

Polearms - easier. More fun
2h - more fun. Easier

[BlackMilk]

No Gurnisson, just no.

[Vibe]

Well for me, 2h are the most fun, probably because I like doing funky feints. I also enjoyed playing polearm too. Shielder and cav a bit less.

So, sorted by fun factor for me:

2h > pole > shielder > cav > ranged

[Kafein]

Fact :

When I was pole cav (one week ago) with 3 ath, I was actually doing better (on foot) when I could loot some 2h on the battlefield than using my poleaxe (or any other pole side-weapon), even though I got 160 wpf in pole and 0 in 2h.


One weapon is enough to describe the difference between poles and 2h : the mace.

[Vibe]

One weapon is enough to describe the difference between poles and 2h : the mace.

How does that thing describe the difference?

[Thucydides]

heres the difference: 2h glance less, get stuck in random shit less, and can hiltslash better than a regular polearm. Sweetspot is also larger, and the hitbox isn't glitchy like polearms.

[Zisa]

heres the difference: 2h glance less, get stuck in random shit less, and can hiltslash better than a regular polearm. Sweetspot is also larger, and the hitbox isn't glitchy like polearms.

nonsense.

Try a flamberge.

[Thucydides]

nonsense.

Try a flamberge.

uses polearm animation? lul.

anyways, it was a half rage post after playing on eu and getting outspammed by everyone. Apparently lag delays your swing by .1 second.