All good observations. Disagree with you on the shielder part. I could get plenty of kills when I was shielder not so long ago. Fighting 2handers with a 1h weapon is not so perilous as it seems. It just takes a little bit of patience and good timing.I could give Phyrex very good duels with my 1h weapon and if not match him toe to toe, give him a decent fight with plenty of strikes on him.(Bloody lordly armour ) 3 two hander hits to 1 of your hits is untrue. Your own fault imo.
This may well be a problem with my build, or indeed a problem with being too used to Native combat mechanics, however against most two-handers who use either of those twenty-foot long light-sabers, they are able to spam me with most hits, not due to my being stunned, or indeed due to a lack of good timing on my part, or any other of the plethora of explanations offered to players new to the game.
<constructivecriticism>
Thanks.
Welcome back!Although i fail to see why ud make ur main a STF char.Also ur opinions on 1 handed seem to be off to say the least, a good 1 hander can beat the same skill 2 hander eg. Kinngrimm.
Mainly because I don't particularly like grinding, and want to have an okay character for Strategus. The thing is, I don't think it's an to do with the shield, more to do with the one-handers themselves. Once my shield has been broken, and I'm fighting a two-hander, I still need to block at least three times in order to get anywhere near them, and my hits still consistently bounce against their armour. Any kind of feinting on my side is pointless, as they'll just spam through it; holds are useful to a point, for buying time; chambers are utterly pointless since they'll always be able to dodge them.
Anywho, Alex C. Mind if I use parts of this and/or link it to my guide? This was particularly well written.
Not at all, and thanks.
Who are you sorry?
Eh, I could ask the same of you to be honest. Don't recall ever playing with you.
I mean, underpowered? heck no. 2 of those damned lolskarl turtles facehug you and it's over.
Err... two competent members of most classes against you and you're probably dead as well.
Also, they have protection from ranged, don't have to manual block, get fast, and hard hitting, let alone derp weapons like the scimitar and the picks, etc.
Protection from ranged is a biggy, fair enough. Not having to manual block isn't, it's not like manual blocking's hard. I've seen far fewer silly one-handers than I have silly two-handers. =p
And yeah, go to hell with the "omg 1h is short" crap. With a shield like Huscarl, the hell cares about length? They facehug 24/7 anyway.
So this "omg short range q_q" is even an advantage, because 1h has the tendency to headhit from all sides the most, from what I've experienced.
I already said that the problem with one-handers lies not in their being underpowered, but in two-handers being over-powered.
But honestly, +1 to this thread. Best stealth 1h+shield lobby I've ever seen.
TBH shielders are powerful in 1v1, they aren't underpowered. If I didn't enjoy manual blocking so much, I'd play my shielders more since I influence victory more with them.
Not really stealth, anything I've tried to point out is written quite clearly there. I see one-handers as being relatively under-powered in most circumstances, thus I wrote that.