Seems like you don't understand, turning doesnt increase damage, it DECREASE it. But also it gives SPEED.
-it's not obvious that shield allow better blocking. From some perspective, yes, from other, it's awful.
-like 2h, 2h have more chances actually.
-like 2h who is not in combat and use shield
-not really faster, on par, counting stun. on the other hand lack damage and reach so sucks and is plain inferior.
Wtf does any of that even mean? Writing paragraphs in point form = fail.
'-it's not obvious that shield allow better blocking. From some perspective, yes, from other, it's awful.'
What the hell is that supposed to mean? How the hell can a shield allow better blocking from some perspectives but not from others? Maybe if the person with the shield has a broken second mouse button...? How is it awful in anyway? Shield is the easiest and most useful form of blocking in c-RPG. To argue against that is just ludicrous, bro.
'2h have more chances'
How? Anyone who uses a 2h wep as their main but carries a shield has obviously sacrificed WPF and skill points to wield the shield so in fact they have a disadvantage against someone who's pure sword/board. It's much harder then you'd imagine avoiding damage without carrying a shield. You need great footwork and it helps having a decent pc/ping.
I can't understand your terrible argument bro... are you trying to say you think 1h speed needs a buff? That's what I'm thinkin you're saying and I can't help but lmao hard. Rerry hard.
So which 2h's are you saying are faaaar superior to 1h speed/dmg? You're failing to grasp the concept that when you're wielding a shield AND a weapon, you have penalties.
If you have footwork problems, I feel bad for ya son but, I got 99 problems and getting a hit aint one.
Play more, bitch less?
