Author Topic: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232  (Read 28930 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hemingway

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 4
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Tumbler
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #75 on: July 12, 2011, 04:18:38 pm »
0
-Upkeep still too high for newer players
+Ammo buff to throwers
+Random chadz text for multi  :D

Offline TucKMuncK

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 80
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: TM
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #76 on: July 12, 2011, 04:19:43 pm »
0
- 2 hand ppl spam me to death while I do double feint with my 1hand/shield combo
+ New bows
In memory of TucKMuncK_Wolper, member of River Pirates, ruler of Amashke

Offline Andropov

  • Peasant
  • *
  • Renown: 5
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #77 on: July 12, 2011, 04:19:58 pm »
0
-Upkeep way too high.

Offline DrTaco

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 179
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player
  • Your eternal reward
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Swashbucklers
  • Game nicks: Magical Toaster
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #78 on: July 12, 2011, 04:24:34 pm »
0
+Strat is here sooner or later
+ Lancers aren't GTX worthy
+ HA aren't as numerous
+ Archers aren't as annoying
- Everyone bitches ingame
- No Strat yet
- I hate upkeep.
- Strength is still the focus of the game, Agility is still the redheaded stepchild.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 05:17:36 pm by DrTaco »
Don't take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

Offline Corrado_Decimo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 109
  • Infamy: 55
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Corrado_the_Grey, Bodyguard_the_Grey, Sniper_IV_the_Grey, Ston3rh, Hopleet
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #79 on: July 12, 2011, 04:30:54 pm »
0
- 2 hand ppl spam me to death while I do double feint with my 1hand/shield combo

i don't think this is patch related.

Offline Paul

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Renown: 1879
  • Infamy: 442
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ball bounce boss
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: Urist
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #80 on: July 12, 2011, 04:39:59 pm »
-1
Projectile speed for archers is at the point of ridiculousness, we need an archer developer asap.

I play 3 archer chars. Shik has at least 1 too. Both of us were behind the recent change.

Offline Remy

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 68
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remy_the_Fox
  • IRC nick: Remy
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #81 on: July 12, 2011, 04:46:19 pm »
0
+- Lancers have a harder time, but perhaps they need a bit larger angle of attack

+- Viable Throwing Weapons, throwing may be slightly too good

+- Archery nerfed(too much?)

- Xbows need to be balanced
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Fox, Horse Archer, Tker of Chagan.

Offline Shpongled

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 34
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player
  • Totally shpongled, mate...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Merc_Shpongled, Merc_Shpongebob_Tightpantsh, Merc_Shpongtastic
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #82 on: July 12, 2011, 04:59:30 pm »
0
- 40 degrees. Some nerf may have been justified, but the angle is excessively tight.
- projectile speed. Overnerfed.
- upkeep
+/- THROWING IS BACK YAAAAY / no loom respec (i changed away from throwing when it got killed)
+ STF

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

"I gotta turn down my merc application as i was in a pub and would be of no use to you. Maybe it's good for you in the end, although i was motivated to see the first merc's defeat ever in strategus."
 --- Beauchamp

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #83 on: July 12, 2011, 05:17:56 pm »
+1
  • + DTV is fun again
  • + Duplicate Item Names removed and Unique Item Names added.
  • + Throwers being viable.
  • + Sexy new Admin setup for Game Admins.
  • + Superior security for Game Admins (now linked to CD keys).
  • + Better communication with NA side (Like chadz communicating to Ecko about new widgets).
  • + New Items.
  • + Sunlight! (Refering to the permanent darkness of when the last major patch hit)
  • + Extremely quick hotfixes
  • - Website not clearly defined which shields are 2 slots (players figure it out 8 weight and up).
  • - Archery speed reduced too much (did need a small reduction though).
  • - Upkeep forcing increase of "Fake Peasants."
  • - "New Faces" no longer an option. Should have "added" old faces not replaced with.
  • - Overly complicated Arrow Upkeep of them breaking more often instead of simply increasing Base Price (And thus base upkeep).
  • - Paul not following the rules and discussing things in this thread "
    I play 3 archer chars. Shik has at least 1 too. Both of us were behind the recent change.
    "
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 05:24:47 pm by Tears_of_Destiny »
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Farrok

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 20
  • Infamy: 5
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Farrok
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #84 on: July 12, 2011, 05:31:17 pm »
0
+ shield weight slotsystem (though cant use hightier pavese with my xbower for style, but its the same with my longbowman and maul)
+ throwing is back, but maybe to accurate need some time for testing
+ STF for all
+ new DTV
- bow projectile speed to low compare to xbow, following next point...
- imbalance of range classes again, because all is doing nerf archery and forget xbow
- upkeep to high, more fleeing archers because of meleeweapon lack because its cost to much
- cav lance little bit to harsch maybe 45-55?
- semi dead HA class (but a + for the reanimation with quickfix for accuracy)
- imbalance between polearm and twohander didnt get fixed
- with new missile speed melee can better than ever avoid arrows dont want to add realsim but hell this is like matrix!
- all around balancing now in favour of melee spammers again and again and again
- new players will stop playing or atleast have hard times because of upkeep
- crossbows still without requirements, everyone can grab a xbow and shot all other to death and be better than archers(need wpf requirement)
- Warcleaver needs Bonus against shield
-
...
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 05:38:28 pm by Farrok »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Cepeshi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 467
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
  • Relax, it is just a life...
    • View Profile
    • Wanna work with me? Ping for more info!
  • Faction: Deserters
  • Game nicks: Fapulena, Useless
  • IRC nick: Cepeshi
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #85 on: July 12, 2011, 05:36:33 pm »
0
+ throwing in all the possible way, easy to pickup ammo as everyone throws something!
+ lancing: no more dislocated shoulders killing us!
+ STF
+ DTVirgin
+ HA reduction (really no counter as a 2her:S)
- poles are still superior to swords (might be subjective, but...i just feel this way)

Offline Rangerbob

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 40
  • Infamy: 8
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rangerbob
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #86 on: July 12, 2011, 05:42:30 pm »
0
+ performance
+ new items
+ throwing being a little better
- more throwers
--- upkeep like omg...
- polearms are even more broken now that 2handers are nerfed.

Offline Reinhardt

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 274
  • Infamy: 84
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Crusaders of Acre
  • IRC nick: Reinhardt
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #87 on: July 12, 2011, 05:46:12 pm »
0
For cav:
+ Lance speed
- Increase in projectiles (Oh god the horror!)
- being able to only lance unsuspecting people (but I can still get a good score somewhat.)
- REPAIR INCREASE
+/- Archer nerf (longbows are now feared and thinking about it... really they should be.)
- crossbow buff? (wat)
+ old bow models (thank you!)

All i have for now.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 05:47:20 pm by Reinhardt »
"A leader is a dealer in hope."

Offline polkafranzi

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 814
  • Infamy: 276
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • pronouns: Nick/her
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fun clan - Burg Krems, join with main or alt!
  • Game nicks: Adelheid, Wulfing, Hildebrand, Vulferam, Sepp, Pippa (r.i.p), Minjy
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #88 on: July 12, 2011, 05:46:51 pm »
0
- polearms broken need nerf pronto
visitors can't see pics , please register or login



2024: selling my thirty odd +3 items for rl money, don't think i need them anymore tbh. pm me

Offline Ozan

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 84
  • Infamy: 126
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kapikulu
  • Game nicks: Kapikulu_Sultan_Ozan
  • IRC nick: Ozan
Re: [Feedback] What's right/wrong with 0.232
« Reply #89 on: July 12, 2011, 05:48:32 pm »
0
+game performance...  ı have still problems while joining and game throw me away usually
+unkeep.... I didnt used my weapon in a round but ı gave 600 repair..
visitors can't see pics , please register or login