cRPG

cRPG => Game Admin Feedback => Topic started by: Sparvico on April 06, 2016, 08:33:53 am

Title: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 06, 2016, 08:33:53 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: mcdeath on April 06, 2016, 08:34:17 am
Fuck you
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 06, 2016, 08:36:41 am
You're sexy but I don't fuck Bostonians.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Rando on April 06, 2016, 10:29:54 am
I had no idea you were an admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Richyy on April 07, 2016, 10:12:29 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Nightingale on April 07, 2016, 11:07:48 pm
I'm sorry to see you go, it was nice playing with you occasionally.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on April 07, 2016, 11:25:46 pm
Bad admin, worse player. How a jabroni of this level ever got admin will never cease to shock me. This kiddo doesnt even realize its right click to block 90% of the time and cant fite without a shield. Get gud, wear plate, and GTFO my server. You are done kid.






(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 08, 2016, 01:03:12 am
Bad admin, worse player. How a jabroni of this level ever got admin will never cease to shock me. This kiddo doesnt even realize its right click to block 90% of the time and cant fite without a shield. Get gud, wear plate, and GTFO my server. You are done kid.






(click to show/hide)

You say it's a meme, but all of that is true.  :?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: kasMVC on April 08, 2016, 04:27:06 am
I don't trust this guy at all but he is a huge bundle of sticks so he is that going for him
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvauthority
Post by: Westwood on April 08, 2016, 04:46:22 pm
Growing Mossback admin monopoly confirmed. Bad poll = bad admin more poll options please.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Richyy on April 08, 2016, 07:16:22 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Saxton on April 14, 2016, 07:12:06 am
Seriously, how is this kid an admin?

He care's about me so much, that mid-conversation, he will change his steam name, and pretend to not be himself.

#SAXTON4ADMIN

#WALL

#MAKEcRPG GREAT
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: mcdeath on April 14, 2016, 08:16:44 am
Saxton 4 mute
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 14, 2016, 03:32:16 pm
Seriously, how is this kid an admin?

He care's about me so much, that mid-conversation, he will change his steam name, and pretend to not be himself.

#SAXTON4ADMIN

#WALL

#MAKEcRPG GREAT

Man personally I thought that was hilarious.

Also we were discussing strategus business, which is not under the purview of my admin-ship unless it is in regards to actions taken by individuals in an actual battle. Not you asking me to gift you a fief.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: njames89 on April 14, 2016, 03:41:16 pm
Guys he just really really wants to sell any fiefs he is given immediately for looms reform chaos...
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on April 15, 2016, 02:18:43 am
literally the best adman
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: HappyPhantom on April 17, 2016, 01:48:58 am
literally the best adman

Fuck you, oh wait..
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on April 17, 2016, 04:05:35 am
literally the best adman

i have ads disabled tho

will he be invis?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 17, 2016, 04:50:27 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on April 17, 2016, 01:23:12 pm
Fuck you, oh wait..

aboose

will he be invis?

yea I guess he will be, we will never see him again

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Butan on April 17, 2016, 02:44:31 pm
(click to show/hide)


I know these threads are not used a lot for anything other than complaints or small talk, but I'm interested to ask you a serious admin question because you seem like a fine gentleman and is new enough to not be fossilized about how to deal with the community.

(click to show/hide)

I put on bold the significant parts.
Dont you think there should be a ban cap per severity of offense, like in real life? My biggest issue with how bans are handled cRPG-wide is often because of the silliness of the ban times some "known individuals" get without taking into account anything else than ban history.
Of course we arent police, we dont do detective work on why does people did this or that, so ban history is a useful tool, but my opinion is that except permaban worthy stuff, all or at least some ban durations should be capped so that even when a dude got 15 bans already, if he makes one wrong move he doesnt get off for months at a time at the silliest thing.

Simply because when a ban looks retarded it sometimes is, and some "known individuals" are still beneficial to the community in terms of activity. There is also the odd case of people actually changing their ways, but since their history doesnt let up, as soon as they slip they get a huge one, and thats shit for karma.


Also I wonder how would you deal with individuals getting, for example, only "major infractions" (in your book), amouting to say 30 days ban and double for the next one; if that person does a minor infraction next, its accounted separately to all the major infractions he made?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Porthos on April 17, 2016, 03:00:59 pm
Butan, lets go play minecraft, buddy. Just let it die.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 18, 2016, 08:38:31 am
(click to show/hide)


I know these threads are not used a lot for anything other than complaints or small talk, but I'm interested to ask you a serious admin question because you seem like a fine gentleman and is new enough to not be fossilized about how to deal with the community.


I put on bold the significant parts.
Dont you think there should be a ban cap per severity of offense, like in real life? My biggest issue with how bans are handled cRPG-wide is often because of the silliness of the ban times some "known individuals" get without taking into account anything else than ban history.
Of course we arent police, we dont do detective work on why does people did this or that, so ban history is a useful tool, but my opinion is that except permaban worthy stuff, all or at least some ban durations should be capped so that even when a dude got 15 bans already, if he makes one wrong move he doesnt get off for months at a time at the silliest thing.

Simply because when a ban looks retarded it sometimes is, and some "known individuals" are still beneficial to the community in terms of activity. There is also the odd case of people actually changing their ways, but since their history doesnt let up, as soon as they slip they get a huge one, and thats shit for karma.


Also I wonder how would you deal with individuals getting, for example, only "major infractions" (in your book), amouting to say 30 days ban and double for the next one; if that person does a minor infraction next, its accounted separately to all the major infractions he made?

Sorry meant to reply to this sooner but got busy working this weekend.

There are a couple of stipulations that are not listed there for various reasons. The biggest one is that infractions that occurred over one calendar year ago have no bearing on the offense number a person would be on. Additionally repeated offenses only increase the severity of the ban time if the specific infraction is in fact the same as the previous one. i.e. a warning for the minor infraction of leeching becomes a 24 hour ban for the second infraction of leeching, but not if the second infraction is delaying. This of course has a limit, once 4 infractions within a category are reached the ban time doubles based on the longest ban time for an infraction in whatever category is relevant.

Even so if we do the math we see that for minor infractions we get
1st: warning
2nd: 1 day
3rd: 2 days
4th: 4 days
5th: 8 days
6th: 16 days
7th: 32 days
Which mean only extreme cases of repeated offenses would get more than a week ban time.

For major infractions it is slightly less lenient, as major infractions are the kind that directly prevent someone else from playing the game in the normal fashion. Such that: 
1st: 1 day
2nd: 2 days
3rd: 4 days
4th: 8 days
5th: 16 days
6th: 32 days
That essentially means that a person has to commit 4 of the exact same offense before even a week of ban time is handed down.

In addition to this there is the fact that, unless there is significant harm being done to the team as a whole, we generally only ban people when someone makes a specific complaint to us in a situation.


ALSO: Chat abuse, in my opinion, is when one player verbally (textually) abuses another individual in the server. In order for it to be abuse it has to be targeted and malicious. Even then there are many options with which one can avoid seeing such stuff, and so the bans for that would probably be even less severe than what is listed in the OP. That said I will be muting anyone that types the big no-no slurs in the server, and if the mute is evaded and the slurs continue a ban will be handed down. However I've honestly never seen it be an issue so long as the situation is handled properly.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on April 19, 2016, 12:00:56 pm
let's face it sparvi u woulnd't ban me no matter how many times i called u a cheese burger eating school shooting yank ur just another shitmin get REKT
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Butan on April 19, 2016, 12:54:32 pm
Thx for your answer, another precision:

The biggest one is that infractions that occurred over one calendar year ago have no bearing on the offense number a person would be on.

So if someone within a year does 100 minor infractions of the same category (for the sake of argument), it will keep doubling with no possible maximum?  :P  You stop at 32 days in both minor/major examples, maybe it could be that maximum duration.
Whatever is your opinion, your system seems solid, good luck in your endeavour  :mrgreen:

Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Tagora on April 19, 2016, 07:36:14 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on April 19, 2016, 07:46:01 pm
let's face it sparvi u woulnd't ban me no matter how many times i called u a cheese burger eating school shooting yank ur just another shitmin get REKT
admins are only allowed to ban kadeth if they can beat him in a ft7
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jambi on April 19, 2016, 08:33:15 pm

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on April 19, 2016, 08:36:56 pm
(click to show/hide)

pro click zone
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 19, 2016, 08:46:13 pm

(click to show/hide)

I need to get this for my churches nursery. Gatdayum.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jambi on April 19, 2016, 08:51:12 pm
That said I will be muting anyone that types the big no-no slurs in the server, and if the mute is evaded and the slurs continue a ban will be handed down. However I've honestly never seen it be an issue so long as the situation is handled properly.

And thats exactly how i see the admin role.
Take and be in control when players break rules, and enforce the rules with the tools and maturity you should have.

A ban is not the way to solve things, a ban is realy the admins panic button, when an admin feels he lost control and tried everything else.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: xxkaliboyx on April 20, 2016, 01:20:04 am
And thats exactly how i see the admin role.
Take and be in control when players break rules, and enforce the rules with the tools and maturity you should have.

A ban is not the way to solve things, a ban is realy the admins panic button, when an admin feels he lost control and tried everything else.

I guess you miss the racial temper tantrum this guy displayed when something didn't go his way. Instead of showing the maturity to holding his composure.

This guy isn't fit to admin, but at the very least keep this guy contained to this community and don't let him spread like a virus.

Prepare incoming memes!
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 20, 2016, 01:39:06 am
I guess you miss the racial temper tantrum this guy displayed when something didn't go his way. Instead of showing the maturity to holding his composure.

This guy isn't fit to admin, but at the very least keep this guy contained to this community and don't let him spread like a virus.

Prepare incoming memes!

Your penchant for the melodramatic least funny memes never ceases to amaze me.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jambi on April 20, 2016, 03:08:44 am
Your penchant for the melodramatic least funny memes never ceases to amaze me.

Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Butan on April 20, 2016, 03:20:28 pm
I guess you miss the racial temper tantrum this guy displayed when something didn't go his way. Instead of showing the maturity to holding his composure.

This guy isn't fit to admin, but at the very least keep this guy contained to this community and don't let him spread like a virus.

Prepare incoming memes!


If he had "held his composure" in the situation you describe, it would mean that he would not have done anything about what you criticize too: the handling of the n-word affair.
The irony!
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Saxton on April 20, 2016, 07:28:03 pm
Honestly who gave this kid more powers than a knob-polisher?

He bans me for being "a 12 year old"

HE KNOWS WELL AND GOOD IM ONLY 9 AND A HALF
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 22, 2016, 01:41:30 am
Honestly who gave this kid more powers than a knob-polisher?

He bans me for being "a 12 year old"

HE KNOWS WELL AND GOOD IM ONLY 9 AND A HALF

Honestly who gave this kid more powers than a knob-polisher?

knob-polisher

knob-polisher

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on May 04, 2016, 06:38:25 am
Banned Tanzo for a day for showing up to a strat battle because other people in the battle cheated. He didn't put up any polls and unless you can prove he 1'd them then there is literally no reason for him to be banned.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Dynamics_BRD on May 04, 2016, 06:47:43 am
Badmin locking threads so players can't respond. He's trying to play the role of admin but is clearly faking it.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on May 04, 2016, 06:57:01 am
Every ban I had evidence for was handled according to my stated system, additionally it is customary to lock a thread after admin action has been taken. As in 4 years of precedence customary. Other admins can still post in the threads saying whatever they like, and the admin feedback section on the forums is for feedback after the admin action has been taken.

Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Malaclypse on May 04, 2016, 07:02:38 am
Yeah I've never (or, well, rarely) known a ban/unban thread to remain open after the issue was resolved, the person/people punished, warned, unbanned or kept banned. Seems like a silly complaint to levy.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Tagora on May 04, 2016, 11:14:17 am
only real na admonk around tbh fam
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Butan on May 04, 2016, 02:40:58 pm
Sparvico trial by fire begins... NOW!  :P



Banned Tanzo for a day for showing up to a strat battle because other people in the battle cheated. He didn't put up any polls and unless you can prove he 1'd them then there is literally no reason for him to be banned.

Identifying people in strat battles is not easy bru. Pseudonyms, lack of total access to logs etc... Being under pressure from offended to quickly identify offenders is no easy job! Believe in the man that he will fix things he done wrong at the second he is able to, if he really did. Admins need players to properly execute sentence so keep the feedback coming.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Switchtense on May 04, 2016, 04:52:19 pm
Having a system to strictly follow in order to hand out punishments is not a good idea really.

As Dynamics said, he (or anyone involved really) put days, or weeks, maybe even months (if he is slow) into gearing up armies and stuff.
Then some moronic people decide it would be funny to have the entire enemy team banned, thus making all those previous efforts null and void.

Now I do not consider this a major offense, but those people involved probably had a good chuckle and had a wank for the rest of the night, just to hop back on cRPG the day after.

While at the same time, those people losing their army are incredibly frustrated and demotivated to even continue. Because why does anyone need to work in order to get an army, if they can just attack with 100 unarmed people and then get the enemy team banned, for a mere 24 hour ban?

For such a case your system needs a "Adjust punishment accordingly to severity of offense"-clause.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Butan on May 04, 2016, 06:58:56 pm
The system he has is for cRPG.

For the reasons you stated there should be a different set of rules for Strategus (being banned from the strategus servers solely (EU_3 and NA_3), frozen or even wiped on the strategus map, transfer stolen assets, delete duped assets, etc), but as long as there is none you cannot have a fair system if you ban someone from playing battle/siege for days just because he did something that has consequence on a totally different game, think about it.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Keshian on May 04, 2016, 07:06:28 pm
The system he has is for cRPG.

For the reasons you stated there should be a different set of rules for Strategus (being banned from the strategus servers solely (EU_3 and NA_3), frozen or even wiped on the strategus map, transfer stolen assets, delete duped assets, etc), but as long as there is none you cannot have a fair system if you ban someone from playing battle/siege for days just because he did something that has consequence on a totally different game, think about it.

They actually do.  Pollbanning on NA3 to win a fight has always carried longer sentence of banning because it is much harder to correct what has been done to the people harmed.  Sparvico is friends with these guys and is basically treating them like they had some shits and giggles on NA1 for fun pollbanning and not a concerted effort to pollban off an enemy strategus team in order not to lose a strat fight like the baddies they are even after doing a ninja roster to begin with (and they say they don't care about strat or cprg, lol top kecks)

Situation like that should have left it to someone who might be a bit more impartial.  Sparvico and Artyem(why does he even still have admin) friends with them and they both were active on those ban threads.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Dupre on May 04, 2016, 07:18:41 pm
They actually do.  Pollbanning on NA3 to win a fight has always carried longer sentence of banning because it is much harder to correct what has been done to the people harmed.  Sparvico is friends with these guys and is basically treating them like they had some shits and giggles on NA1 for fun pollbanning and not a concerted effort to pollban off an enemy strategus team in order not to lose a strat fight like the baddies they are even after doing a ninja roster to begin with (and they say they don't care about strat or cprg, lol top kecks)

Situation like that should have left it to someone who might be a bit more impartial.  Sparvico and Artyem(why does he even still have admin) friends with them and they both were active on those ban threads.

I took care of some of the turds already. I'll find out who the other ones were.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on May 04, 2016, 10:16:46 pm
Having a system to strictly follow in order to hand out punishments is not a good idea
Wow your hypocrisy is astounding.

How do you feel about Desire's "system to strictly follow in order to hand out punishments" ? Any thoughts? Pretty sure you've praised him for doing exactly that.

Sparvico is a class act despite his alcoholism. The finest admin cRPG has known throughout its days (and he was only an admin for the last couple lmao).
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Keshian on May 04, 2016, 10:56:55 pm
Wow your hypocrisy is astounding.

How do you feel about Desire's "system to strictly follow in order to hand out punishments" ? Any thoughts? Pretty sure you've praised him for doing exactly that.

Sparvico is a class act despite his alcoholism. The finest admin cRPG has known throughout its days (and he was only an admin for the last couple lmao).

God damn son, you are unbelievably dumb.

First, Switchtense wasn't supporting desire's actions.

Second, the whole point of what Desire did was adapting to the circumstances with an entire half the server behaving like mindless lemmings and acting obnoxious using the N-word.  It wasn't a hard and fast rule of everyone gets a mute (getting way too far out of hand too quickly for that to even work especially with an admin supporting the misbehavior)  - making up a quote for desire doesn't make it true.  She adapted to the circumstances, just like any good admin, instead of using set standards for NA1 to be used to favor friends on na3, while ignoring the circumstances and ramifications.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on May 04, 2016, 11:00:22 pm
They actually do.  Pollbanning on NA3 to win a fight has always carried longer sentence of banning because it is much harder to correct what has been done to the people harmed.  Sparvico is friends with these guys and is basically treating them like they had some shits and giggles on NA1 for fun pollbanning and not a concerted effort to pollban off an enemy strategus team in order not to lose a strat fight like the baddies they are even after doing a ninja roster to begin with (and they say they don't care about strat or cprg, lol top kecks)

Situation like that should have left it to someone who might be a bit more impartial.  Sparvico and Artyem(why does he even still have admin) friends with them and they both were active on those ban threads.

There is nothing more impartial than adhering to a pre-determined system. Which is exactly what I did.  If any sort of lenience exists it's because my system is designed so that only repeat offenders receive harsh punishment. Well that and the fact I still can't see the logs or look up player names so the ones I couldn't immediately ban had to be picked up by dupre.

God damn son, you are unbelievably dumb.

First, Switchtense wasn't supporting desire's actions.

Second, the whole point of what Desire did was adapting to the circumstances with an entire half the server behaving like mindless lemmings and acting obnoxious using the N-word.  It wasn't a hard and fast rule of everyone gets a mute (getting way too far out of hand too quickly for that to even work especially with an admin supporting the misbehavior)  - making up a quote for desire doesn't make it true.  She adapted to the circumstances, just like any good admin, instead of using set standards for NA1 to be used to favor friends on na3, while ignoring the circumstances and ramifications.

Keshian here in america we use statutory criminal codes and fair retributive justice systems for a reason. Fly by your pants adaptation to circumstances only works if you really know what you're doing, and since I doubt any of us are sitting judges I'mma say we're not expert enough to make it work in extreme situations (or as extreme as you can get on the fucking internet),  like what happened with desire.

When you get in over your head as an admin you should fall back on precedence and a systematic approach, not start making up punishments on the fly.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on May 04, 2016, 11:31:23 pm
God damn son, you are unbelievably dumb.

First, Switchtense wasn't supporting desire's actions.

Second, the whole point of what Desire did was adapting to the circumstances with an entire half the server behaving like mindless lemmings and acting obnoxious using the N-word.  It wasn't a hard and fast rule of everyone gets a mute (getting way too far out of hand too quickly for that to even work especially with an admin supporting the misbehavior)  - making up a quote for desire doesn't make it true.  She adapted to the circumstances, just like any good admin, instead of using set standards for NA1 to be used to favor friends on na3, while ignoring the circumstances and ramifications.

Here are some direct quotes for you, to spell it out plainly.

(click to show/hide)

I have no idea how you can dispute that Switchtense was one of many competing with you to see how far down their throat they could get Desire's admin record.

Would retard be a better slur for you?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Switchtense on May 05, 2016, 02:19:21 am
Guys, this is Sparvico's feedback thread, my feedback was solely referring to that ban polling incident on NA3.

Westwood, whether I am being a hypocrite or not, your comment adds absolutely nothing productive.

Just to make you feel less butthurt, I did tell Desire that the length of the bans she handed out was not appropriate. The action taken was absolutely appropriate.
Edit: The fact that a vast amount of people started shitting on her, while it was their own fault (As Heskey said, 'Someone got banned for saying friend? I will say it! Oh wow, I got banned?! Desire Badmin!'), that behavior is what I criticise.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on May 05, 2016, 02:46:34 am
Guys, this is Sparvico's feedback thread, my feedback was solely referring to that ban polling incident on NA3.

Westwood, whether I am being a hypocrite or not, your comment adds absolutely nothing productive.
I'm giving feedback on Sparvico too.

If a hypocrite, a jackass, and a small child are going to talk smack at him for doing his job and helping them, when he really didn't have to, I will defend him. We're golf partners irl.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on May 05, 2016, 03:43:03 am
Never talk to me or my wife's son again.

Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Keshian on May 05, 2016, 03:47:55 am
Never talk to me or my wife's son again.

Huh? I really don't think anyone was talking about your family Sparvico.  Most of us are mature and respectful enough of others that we don't do personal attacks on other people's families.  Certainly an admin would never do such a thing if he was competent and unbiased.  Switchtense and I have never attacked anyone's family on this forum, that is the mark of a real child - so I wouldn't put it past westwood - maybe that is who you are referring to.


Though to be fair all that is left in this community are trolls of the worst sort who cry and quit for getting punished when they broke the rules, but still loiter around to troll because they literally have nothing better to do, even if they don't play the game.  i really lump you in with them Sparvico, your rampant championing of getting rid of Desire like some little bitch hall monitor kind of made you out to be a less than fair admin who really just supports his friends over following the rules.  Also, a little bitch.  :wink:
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on May 05, 2016, 04:54:43 am
Huh? I really don't think anyone was talking about your family Sparvico.
lmao

Damn those kids and their memes

(click to show/hide)

Sparvico hmu when you want to go golfing again.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Keshian on May 05, 2016, 05:23:17 am
lmao

Damn those kids and their memes

(click to show/hide)

Sparvico hmu when you want to go golfing again.

Wow if you think insulting the military in general is insulting your family directly - your really are another brainwashed "freedom fry" retard.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on May 05, 2016, 05:37:06 am
retard.
Nice use of slurs PINKO BITCH
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Molly on May 05, 2016, 08:51:32 am
My aunt's uncle has a cousin who has a nephew working at McDonald's. Don't you dare say anything bad about their burgers cuz that would insult my family!

This shit is forum gold :lol:
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on January 09, 2017, 06:11:28 am
Updated the ban times to reflect the dying game.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: N1PS on January 13, 2017, 11:52:19 pm
Ban buddy love
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on February 27, 2017, 05:20:47 am
sparvico
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on March 01, 2017, 09:28:31 am
Kadeth
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Gurgumul on March 01, 2017, 06:14:51 pm
Wrex.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on March 02, 2017, 04:55:01 am
Westwood
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on March 02, 2017, 10:37:42 am


DONKEY!
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on March 02, 2017, 11:46:34 pm
Westwood

westwood?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on March 03, 2017, 06:22:02 am
westwood?
Dad?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Schoi on June 22, 2017, 08:25:54 am
.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: banned123 on June 22, 2017, 09:05:40 am
I think all my previous interactions with Sparvico were him insulting me about Strategus, despite this I think he is a good admin.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Thryn on June 22, 2017, 06:22:24 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on June 22, 2017, 07:25:50 pm
But why Friedman?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Thryn on June 23, 2017, 12:02:48 am
But why Friedman?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on June 23, 2017, 02:21:35 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on June 23, 2017, 09:39:41 am
But why Friedman?
I was going to say probably because Sparvico is a commie cuck but if a man can whip out a picture of based Dick Spady on the fly he's O.K.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on June 26, 2017, 12:45:39 am
banned
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Artyem on July 19, 2017, 01:10:11 am
10/10 making this pinko bastard an admin was the best thing I did before the great purge
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on December 24, 2017, 02:17:46 am
10/10 making this pinko bastard an admin was the best thing I did before the great purge

Baby come back, you can blame it all on me.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Thryn on December 31, 2017, 11:33:25 pm
klaus if u read this my post was a direct quote from this

http://forum.melee.org/unban-essays/the-greatest-unban-essay-ever-written-(expression-freedom-maturity-honesty)/msg602406/#msg602406

thank u for responding 2 shitposts, it enhances my day
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: bensai on January 01, 2018, 11:57:16 pm
klaus if u read this my post was a direct quote from this

http://forum.melee.org/unban-essays/the-greatest-unban-essay-ever-written-(expression-freedom-maturity-honesty)/msg602406/#msg602406

thank u for responding 2 shitposts, it enhances my day

thats not a shitpost you dont know how to shitpost because ur not funny just like when u tried to meme during our 1h buff debate and no1 laughed not even tammo because ur sofucking not funny it makes my testicles ache and move up into my pelvis
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Thryn on January 02, 2018, 12:39:51 am
dang
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: bensai on January 02, 2018, 03:25:38 am
dang

thats probably why you ban threaded me little man probably because u got fucking ROASTD and couldnt handle coming in teamspeak again to face me like a man. how would u feel if u doublespawned ( and dont say "reee i dont double spawn ive seen u do it (and dont quote me and say "reee i dont double spawn ive seen u do it" either ) ) and tammo ban threaded you in a serious manner and didnt talk to you in VOIP or even send u a steam message about it huh?? ur a little rat did u hate me all along huh???? did u just try to get in my good graces so u could stab me in the back???? was i not kind and giving??? give me ur address in texas little snitchy snake and ill be down there in 6 hours with a dozen cars full of lubricant and some basic argument and exposition textbooks so u can actually become a logical person and maybe ull have a chance of being a decent item balancer instead of slapping ur approval stamp on some long mangler with broken animations coupled with ridiculous speed and length or just keep playing two hand because its easy and u cant even carry a positive k/d when u swashbuckle or xbow or cav
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Thryn on January 02, 2018, 03:40:23 am
dang x2
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: bensai on January 02, 2018, 05:52:47 am
u gonna answer the question why you betrayed the trust of ur friend
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Thryn on January 02, 2018, 06:44:14 am
ree i dont double spawn ive seen u do it
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on January 02, 2018, 06:56:07 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Drunken_sailor on January 02, 2018, 07:13:22 am
I selected 4 options in the polls and it denied me my vote, this is bad, the worst kind of bad, the baddest bad that ever badded
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on January 02, 2018, 07:20:24 am
I selected 4 options in the polls and it denied me my vote, this is bad, the worst kind of bad, the baddest bad that ever badded

Very sorry, updated the poll to resolve that terrible issue.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on January 02, 2018, 04:57:17 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Press F to pay respects to the former official whiskey of Mossback

Press S to spit on LVMH Moët Hennessy
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jambi on January 08, 2018, 02:54:58 pm
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on January 26, 2018, 05:33:45 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: njames89 on January 26, 2018, 05:51:24 am
It was good to have you on the team while we did Sparvico. Enjoy your freedom.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jona on January 26, 2018, 05:52:44 am
Welcome back
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Bronto on January 26, 2018, 01:20:44 pm
Holy shit! I had no idea you were leaving admin. I'll miss you but good luck and enjoy your new found freedom.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: traxits on February 02, 2018, 02:26:00 pm
well thank god that nightmare is over
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on February 10, 2018, 06:55:46 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


how does he keep getting away with it?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Rando on February 10, 2018, 12:25:41 pm
Jesus, I never knew allers was such a cunt. it was much better when he just said nothing at all.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Westwood on February 10, 2018, 11:59:21 pm
Jesus, I never knew allers was such a cunt. it was much better when he just said nothing at all.
lmao @ him getting on NA1 on an alt named something like IWontSignForYouAgainIfYouSignAgainstMe yesterday and skimming mercs, shit made my day. Then nigga turns around and gets dunked on. Bless your foppery and whim, Rando.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Rando on February 11, 2018, 12:32:30 am
lmao @ him getting on NA1 on an alt named something like IWontSignForYouAgainIfYouSignAgainstMe yesterday and skimming mercs, shit made my day. Then nigga turns around and gets dunked on. Bless your foppery and whim, Rando.

he got mega owned
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jona on February 12, 2018, 06:11:18 pm
Jesus, I never knew allers was such a cunt. it was much better when he just said nothing at all.

Guess you're just too much of a newfag to know what happened in ye olden times when he used to say plenty, all the time. There's a reason he's on his 15th (or higher?) cd key.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 12, 2018, 07:36:28 pm
you know, sparvico does seem happier now that he isn't an admin, and more well-adjusted

i fear that only gallo/cajun are immune to the necrotic, spergotic effects of Internet Authority

they alone can resist the call of the Internet Keyboard Man
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: StonedSteel on February 12, 2018, 07:49:54 pm
Guess you're just too much of a newfag to know what happened in ye olden times when he used to say plenty, all the time. There's a reason he's on his 15th (or higher?) cd key.

im sure it has nothing to do with whiney passive aggressive super sensitive flip flopity hypocritical cunt admins now does it?

id much rather play with him who actually wants to play a medieval wargame, then most of the rest of you lame mmo homo's.


lol these newmy old friends have no idea the fucking history of this place, 3-4 yrs ago rando and that westwood my old friend would have stood beside allers against chaos

like most of us who now no longer play did.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jona on February 12, 2018, 08:00:26 pm
im sure it has nothing to do with whiney passive aggressive super sensitive flip flopity hypocritical cunt admins now does it?

id much rather play with him who actually wants to play a medieval wargame, then most of the rest of you lame mmo homo's.


lol these newmy old friends have no idea the fucking history of this place, 3-4 yrs ago rando and that westwood my old friend would have stood beside allers against chaos

like most of us who now no longer play did.

True enough, but allers did like to run his lip towards fellow "people who'd rather play an medieval wargame" and not only admins. If he only had it in for admins, then he wouldn't have stood out from the crowd.

Also apparently fag now autocorrects to "my old friend"... this something new, or am I just hella slow?
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on February 14, 2018, 04:46:34 am
I always new my old friend was a fag.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on February 14, 2018, 05:24:46 am
Also apparently fag now autocorrects to "my old friend"... this something new, or am I just hella slow?

http://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/fag/
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Asheram on February 14, 2018, 06:04:06 am
http://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/fag/
http://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/bundleofsticks
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Jona on February 14, 2018, 05:49:32 pm
http://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/fag/

Lol I had no idea what that thread was about at the time... now it all makes sense.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Kadeth on February 25, 2018, 11:38:16 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Yeldur on February 25, 2018, 11:56:16 pm
My blocks are not working. You may interpret that however you wish, but I can hardly be expected to perform at a high level when I'm holding a block in the appropriate direction and yet attacks are penetrating straight through them.
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Rando on March 14, 2018, 11:38:15 am
wait sparvico isnt an admin anymore??
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on March 15, 2018, 06:11:40 pm
wait sparvico isnt an admin anymore??

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Rando on April 07, 2018, 04:46:14 am
Last Active: April 06, 2018, 03:06:08 AM
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Sparvico on April 08, 2018, 01:41:46 am
Last Active: April 06, 2018, 03:06:08 AM
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] Sparvico
Post by: Rando on June 16, 2018, 06:02:11 pm
anime