[NA] Sparvico

[Jambi]

That said I will be muting anyone that types the big no-no slurs in the server, and if the mute is evaded and the slurs continue a ban will be handed down. However I've honestly never seen it be an issue so long as the situation is handled properly.

And thats exactly how i see the admin role.
Take and be in control when players break rules, and enforce the rules with the tools and maturity you should have.

A ban is not the way to solve things, a ban is realy the admins panic button, when an admin feels he lost control and tried everything else.

[xxkaliboyx]

And thats exactly how i see the admin role.
Take and be in control when players break rules, and enforce the rules with the tools and maturity you should have.

A ban is not the way to solve things, a ban is realy the admins panic button, when an admin feels he lost control and tried everything else.

I guess you miss the racial temper tantrum this guy displayed when something didn't go his way. Instead of showing the maturity to holding his composure.

This guy isn't fit to admin, but at the very least keep this guy contained to this community and don't let him spread like a virus.

Prepare incoming memes!

[Sparvico]

I guess you miss the racial temper tantrum this guy displayed when something didn't go his way. Instead of showing the maturity to holding his composure.

This guy isn't fit to admin, but at the very least keep this guy contained to this community and don't let him spread like a virus.

Prepare incoming memes!

Your penchant for the melodramatic least funny memes never ceases to amaze me.

[Jambi]

Your penchant for the melodramatic least funny memes never ceases to amaze me.

[Butan]

I guess you miss the racial temper tantrum this guy displayed when something didn't go his way. Instead of showing the maturity to holding his composure.

This guy isn't fit to admin, but at the very least keep this guy contained to this community and don't let him spread like a virus.

Prepare incoming memes!

If he had "held his composure" in the situation you describe, it would mean that he would not have done anything about what you criticize too: the handling of the n-word affair.
The irony!

[Saxton]

Honestly who gave this kid more powers than a knob-polisher?

He bans me for being "a 12 year old"

HE KNOWS WELL AND GOOD IM ONLY 9 AND A HALF

[Sparvico]

Honestly who gave this kid more powers than a knob-polisher?

He bans me for being "a 12 year old"

HE KNOWS WELL AND GOOD IM ONLY 9 AND A HALF

Honestly who gave this kid more powers than a knob-polisher?

knob-polisher

knob-polisher

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Tristan_of_Erzoth]

Banned Tanzo for a day for showing up to a strat battle because other people in the battle cheated. He didn't put up any polls and unless you can prove he 1'd them then there is literally no reason for him to be banned.

[Dynamics_BRD]

Badmin locking threads so players can't respond. He's trying to play the role of admin but is clearly faking it.

[Sparvico]

Every ban I had evidence for was handled according to my stated system, additionally it is customary to lock a thread after admin action has been taken. As in 4 years of precedence customary. Other admins can still post in the threads saying whatever they like, and the admin feedback section on the forums is for feedback after the admin action has been taken.

[Malaclypse]

Yeah I've never (or, well, rarely) known a ban/unban thread to remain open after the issue was resolved, the person/people punished, warned, unbanned or kept banned. Seems like a silly complaint to levy.

[Tagora]

only real na admonk around tbh fam

[Butan]

Sparvico trial by fire begins... NOW! 

Banned Tanzo for a day for showing up to a strat battle because other people in the battle cheated. He didn't put up any polls and unless you can prove he 1'd them then there is literally no reason for him to be banned.

Identifying people in strat battles is not easy bru. Pseudonyms, lack of total access to logs etc... Being under pressure from offended to quickly identify offenders is no easy job! Believe in the man that he will fix things he done wrong at the second he is able to, if he really did. Admins need players to properly execute sentence so keep the feedback coming.

[Switchtense]

Having a system to strictly follow in order to hand out punishments is not a good idea really.

As Dynamics said, he (or anyone involved really) put days, or weeks, maybe even months (if he is slow) into gearing up armies and stuff.
Then some moronic people decide it would be funny to have the entire enemy team banned, thus making all those previous efforts null and void.

Now I do not consider this a major offense, but those people involved probably had a good chuckle and had a wank for the rest of the night, just to hop back on cRPG the day after.

While at the same time, those people losing their army are incredibly frustrated and demotivated to even continue. Because why does anyone need to work in order to get an army, if they can just attack with 100 unarmed people and then get the enemy team banned, for a mere 24 hour ban?

For such a case your system needs a "Adjust punishment accordingly to severity of offense"-clause.

[Butan]

The system he has is for cRPG.

For the reasons you stated there should be a different set of rules for Strategus (being banned from the strategus servers solely (EU_3 and NA_3), frozen or even wiped on the strategus map, transfer stolen assets, delete duped assets, etc), but as long as there is none you cannot have a fair system if you ban someone from playing battle/siege for days just because he did something that has consequence on a totally different game, think about it.