Your poll is missing the " I don't give a fuck" option.
edit: much better now. :D
Someone causing a reaction like that can't be bad:Was about to post about this. It doesn't even make me mad any more. I just shake my head, laugh about this kind of people and toast to Mother Russia. What a joke...
Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin wrote on Twitter that the Eurovision result “showed supporters of European integration their European future: a bearded girl.”
“There’s no limit to our outrage. It’s the end of Europe. It has turned wild. They don’t have men and women any more. They have ‘it’,” nationalist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky told Rossiya-1 state television.
“Fifty years ago the Soviet army occupied Austria. We made a mistake in freeing Austria. We should have stayed,” added the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party
Someone causing a reaction like that can't be bad:
Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin wrote on Twitter that the Eurovision result “showed supporters of European integration their European future: a bearded girl.”
“There’s no limit to our outrage. It’s the end of Europe. It has turned wild. They don’t have men and women any more. They have ‘it’,” nationalist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky told Rossiya-1 state television.
“Fifty years ago the Soviet army occupied Austria. We made a mistake in freeing Austria. We should have stayed,” added the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party
Do I like this man, you ask me? No.
Eurovision is a freakshow so next time we will send Zhirinovsky.
I am totally cool with everyone's sexual choices. But certainly not with that.
Whatever that guy is doing (in this case still keeping the beard ffs), it is solely for the purpose of attentionwhoring. Nobody can convince me that this is just the way he wants to be. And in my book of principles, irl attentionwhoring is one of the lowliest sins one can commit.
Does attentionwhoring hurt you ? Does it inflict any kind of damage to you ?
Annoys me. But does the fact that attentionwhoring annoys me hurt you? Doest it inflict any kind of damage to you. That is the question Kafein.
Looks like nobody is getting what I'm trying to say here. I started originally by saying "I am cool with everyone's sexual choices". And that is the truth. I didn't write that just for the sake of softening my tone. I can even be cool with the beard, if I knew it was genuinely the way that guy wanted to be. Or, in other words, if it wasn't solely intended for attentionwhoring. There is annoying stuff for everyone. And I am truly annoyed by attentionwhoring that is it. I don't for the life of me believe that there is any reason other than seeking attention to the beard. And he hit the bullseye at that. Just as Prpavi wrote, he is all over the internet, the next big discussion right now.
Once again (I don't believe I have to repeat this so many times, but guess I have no choice) just note that I have nothing against any gender orientation. What I am against here is simply a matter of personality.
Well, he isn't any different to me than any other attentionwhoring artist or celebrity. I dislike any other all the same. If you want an example, this guy belongs to the same league as Lady Gaga, who can go atrocious enough to wear a meat dress to get that much desired attention.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
This is not about the beard. Females can have beards, I see it every day on older women :lol:
Also, most female bodybuilders who went overboard on testosterone grow beards just like men do.
Not to mention that I find beard and any kind of facial hair disgusting, both on males and females and can't stand it on my face longer for a day.
My personal opinion: Female aesthetics is fine and desirable (shemales and such). This is not. If he or she wants to be pretty, she should shave that beard.
Are you kidding me? The one and only thing about women I never liked was their shameful lack of good old bushy beard.
As i said on IRC:I still believe every country should sing in their very own language. Everyone going the English pop routine is kinda lame.
16:29:31 <[ptx]> the problem is, the sort of music that was represented in eurovision, when it was good
16:29:42 <[ptx]> it went out of style
16:29:58 <[ptx]> but eurovision didnt change
16:30:12 <[ptx]> they shouldve changed their style, gone with the times
16:30:37 <[ptx]> but now its just an embarassing relic
visitors can't see pics , please register or loginHm, I think if Putin will go to eurovision with this make up and just stand on the scene for 3 minutes. Next eurovision will be in Russia :P
honestly i got nothing against him her it, he she it can
I wrote a big-ass serious post about what people on the west consider as freedom and why people on the east consider it differently, then I re-read my epic post and deleted everything.God knows, I wasn't going to...
I think it's really cool that you can be whatever you want, even "bearded woman", and most of ppl in the western world won't give a flying fuck about it. It's great to have such a freedom even if most of us don't appreciate it.But you got me here! Now I can't help but write about it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or logintried hard fap fap on this picture, did not work, GODS what's wrong with me!? :(
sounds frightening. Nobody would give a fuck.
It's our tradition to care about what happens around, to care in a way that almost entitles us to judge other people despite their freedom of choice.
A funny example - on the west a smoking woman is treated just as any other woman (I guess), in Russia most men will probably disrespect such a woman.
could you please stop quoting that picture? kills every boner i might have in the next 2 days everytime i see it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
could you please stop quoting that picture? kills every boner i might have in the next 2 days everytime i see it.
What's really frightening is the alternative. When ppl care too much about other ppl choices shit like this happens:I guess I used the wrong word there, instead of "care" people "give a fuck" in both good and bad meanings.
Yeah, these guys care, I can see it.
I hope you see it's retarded. 100+ years ago women couldn't wear trousers (and still can't in some parts of the world). With exception of George Sand :PI'm sorry I don't. It would be retarded if it was prohibited by law, but it's not. Personally, I disrespect a smoking man just as much as a smoking woman, so I'm all for equality! :)
Next year, russia sends in "Kelly Family" to eurovision with a song about family virtues and praises for natural man on woman action. Tru story.No, we will send this.
I guess I used the wrong word there, instead of "care" people "give a fuck" in both good and bad meanings.
I see your point, but this video is bullshit. Please don't use is as an agrument. :)
I'm sorry I don't. It would be retarded if it was prohibited by law, but it's not. Personally, I disrespect a smoking man just as much as a smoking woman, so I'm all for equality! :)
There's a difference between something as meaningless as wearing trousers and a bad habbit as smoking. And to many people in Russia, a smoking woman is a bad mother.
... body and reproductive organs ...
The point is that traditionally, smoking (and drinking) men are more accepted socially than women who do the same things. Which is unfair. Arguing that women should not smoke or drink because they can give birth is reducing them to their reproductive role and is even worse.
This doesn't change the fact that if a pregnant woman drinks and smokes etc. it compromises the health of the baby, of course. But that's an entirely different thing, because not all women are pregnant. And even for pregnant women, all these matters are in the personal space. Their body and reproductive organs are not a property of society.
What's really frightening is the alternative. When ppl care too much about other ppl choices shit like this happens:No tolerance to people who came to fuck a child.
Yeah, these guys care, I can see it.
I hope you see it's retarded. 100+ years ago women couldn't wear trousers (and still can't in some parts of the world). With exception of George Sand :P
Fuck this shit.Seems he got this numbers from his mind, mmm... 2 points to Hungary, mmm... no let's give it to Poland, no to Hungary, 3 to Poland. OMG my mind will blow.
Lets go retro:
No tolerance to people who came to fuck a child.
No I think the point being made was that the people being beat up were paedophiles, although there is some debate over whether the people being targeted by vigilante groups are actually paedophiles, or gay, or a mixture of the two. Regardless, vigilantism isn't the right thing imo.
No surprise that Leshma likes her/him/it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Lol, in UK and Ireland the public vote when to those slutty Polish girls, but the 'professional' panel gave them 0 :'( they should have won.
Mother has no right to kill her own baby
(click to show/hide)
I spoke about video.
So wearing a dress is equal to rape? Russian logic :rolleyes:
cought in the act or just gay=pedophile?They are paedophiles who came to young boys. If you watch the full episode you will see everything from first facebook (vk.com) message. It's not a gayhunting.
As long as baby sits in her belly she can kill it with no repercussion. At least according to most (all?) of european legislaltions.
Most countries in the European Union allow abortion on demand during the first trimester. After the first trimester, abortion is allowed only under certain circumstances, such as risk to woman's life or health, fetal defects or other specific situations that may be related to the circumstances of the conception or the woman's age.
With the exception of Poland, Europe's formerly Communist countries have liberal abortion laws. Poland is a country with a strict abortion law, and where it is also difficult to have a legal abortion on request.
Also you come from a country which:
The good old staircase accident style of abortion always works anyway.
She might not end up in prison, but hardly will avoid being in mental care institution for some time. Just like people who choose to harm themselves without valid reason. We're not free to kill ourselves, without anyone raising a question why. Nor we should be. Society has a purpose.
Death will occur in more cases than not. I wouldn't call it a "style" because only dumb (or desperate) will risk their life like that. If can be proven that woman did that intentionally, most likely will be treated as attempted suicide first, then murder of a baby.
Tbh I think it's better for a child not to be born at all than live in a family where parents don't want it.
That's cruel. Life can be miserable, but it is always better than being dead. Whole "I wanna kill myself, can't live like this" thing is just a phase, it's not something permanent. Death, on the other hand, is permanent. You can rewire your brain to accept tremendous pain, if you try hard enough. But you can't revive dead brain.
I don't understand LGBTs... you are born either a man or a woman, XY or XX, and that's it.You are wrong!
I3. "we must show tolerance, ho!"
gays are not fighting for freedom and tolerance, they are fighting for their own thing. aren't the most famous gay designers known of criticism of another huge group of people, fat people? obviously, being fat isn't a valid choice and those people should be exterminated and turned into"normal" individuals. so much hypocrisy and double standards, it's not even funny.Being fat is, except in a few very rare cases, a choice - and unhealthy one at that. Does not compare with sexuality at all.
And to the best of my knowledge no regimes have ever tried to systematically exterminate fat people, or formally declare them 2nd class citizens.The UK might have. There have been tons of reports here about how worried MPs are about the fat kids in the UK. Kinda makes you 2nd class... well, maybe not by rights but socially?
The UK might have. There have been tons of reports here about how worried MPs are about the fat kids in the UK. Kinda makes you 2nd class... well, maybe not by rights but socially?
Dont turn this forum to tumblr :?
Well, a really fat and ugly woman would have trouble reporting rape as well, no ?A really fat and ugly woman would have trouble getting raped in the first place. :)
I'm so done with meleegaming100% done.
I wasn't trying to equalize the UK to Russia.
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/russian-scientists-discover-cure-to-homosexuality/
I'm no biologist, but they may have a point about estrogen mimickers having some effect.
Being fat is, except in a few very rare cases, a choice - and unhealthy one at that. Does not compare with sexuality at all.
Implying that sexual preference has something to do with biology...
Surely that was a bandwagon everyone has been on for centuries until the 60s onwards?
His suicide was in the 50s.
You're implying that the amount of homosexuality is increasing as a %, that would be impossible to prove.
this of course doesnt completely work either, as you (the east/russia, whatever) have just as many free thinkers as any other country.
(click to show/hide)
What unnatural bullshit? What do you define as natural and by what standards?every healthy human same as any other animal born to make a new generation and leave the world for life of this(and next) genration(s).
pile of crap you decided to dump on us in your posthow come that if you dont like it - its a bullshit? i dont like to see things this way too but its doesnt matter what we like or we dont, things are still going in their way. you dont give a fuck? mmm, okay. but if you dont give a fuck - why do you have something in your mind about it?
Conchita is an over-the-top reaction against people who demand control on the way people should look and act.freedom from what are you getting when you are wearing what you want?when you looks like you want? at the important things you will still act as government requires from you. even at your mind you are able and actually should do that what government wants from you. what does this freedom worth?
1.the trouble is in sexual difference. every healthy human same as any other animal born to make a new generation and leave the world for life of this(and next) genration(s).
why is it standart? because reproduction is one of the main functions of the living organism... or in Gayropean schools teachers are not telling it?
2.how come that if you dont like it - its a bullshit? i dont like to see things this way too but its doesnt matter what we like or we dont, things are still going in their way. you dont give a fuck? mmm, okay. but if you dont give a fuck - why do you have something in your mind about it?
I'm not fussed with 'freedom' so much as intolerance, i know we all exist within accepted social norms to the point where right now you're being a generic stereotypical eastern european response and i'm being a generic western european stereotype.stereotypes are not really informative because i belive most of people who i know dont give a fuck about it or maybe just disgusting. actually the most disgusting thing for me is how popular it became in the "high world". some homos are being posted as famous and respected persons even if there not a single reason to respect them. and pop-culture says that its not just normal to be gay, you should also proud of it o_O thats what i dislike. if you prefer men and you found a guy that you love - let it be... but do not show it for all the world ffs.
'Freedom' is a relative term, intolerance is less so
Ahahaha, if you guys think that homosexuality is dangerous for our future (because of lack of reproduction) then go ahead, you are free to think it. :Dit does. its interfering in my mind and at this way it chaging my life and thats it! i dont want some information spam to change my life! but who is asking me? nobody. its because even when we are free - we are still dependent of each other. so what a point in trying to be free?
(It's not like we need more humans in Earth right?)
And have a look at the past. (before the monotheistic religions)
In the old world (Europe/Asia).Sexuality was free and unchained, and Mankind never missed men & women to have a decent/very important reproduction ratio.
Everybody should be free to do what he wants if its not interfering/causing problems with your own life.
It does. its interfering in my mind[...]In your mind....
i dont want some information spam to change my life!Information spam?
but who is asking me? nobody.Who is asking you what ? :shock: :?
its because even when we are free - we are still dependent of each other. so what a point in trying to be free?Yes, we call this the society. Indeed we are all depending on each others.
Human society inter-dependency will activate when there is a dire need of reproduction, atm the earth is over-populated so there is more incentive for exploration of sexual preferences.This needs more than a +1 :)
The possibility to reproduce without natural intercourse, thanks to our technology, adds to the fact there is less natural necessity for natural mating.
If a comet hit earth or a pandemic wipe out most of the human race and all its infrastructure, homosexuals will start mating with the other sex like there is no tomorrow, else there will really be no tomorrow and we are really fucked (in the bad sense).
I dont see it happening, except if sterile intercourse becomes the ultimate norm and we culturally/psychologically/biologically forget how to have sex. We are very far from this point.
There is lots of scenario where our race is extinguished and I dont think rampant homosexuality is the most plausible one.
A lot of things disgust me, but then I just dont do it. As long as noone is forcing me to mate with something I dont want to, or forcing me to watch them do it, I dont mind.
If gays take over the world and I have no potential sex partner, andsame sexmale people make out in public all the time, and I lose my hands in an accident and dont have enough money to buy prostetic ones, I'm going to be very sad and angry though :(
I'm trully sorry Dark_Blade I forgot you're an utter moron and not worth the time, you don't even the understand half of the words being written to you.
Go back to you "normal" life, I only pray i don't encounter many of your kind in my life... (/ ^____^ )/
What is in your mind do not interferes, with real-life.Please Prpavi, do not try to kill him with your mind :o
(Tell me if one day you are going to be killed because someone thought at it :) )
It's unfortunate that Judeo-Christian morals are so dogmatic on the issue of reproduction.
7 billion people and we still have people whose argument against anything not heterosexual is "BUT NEED MOAR BABBYS D: D: D:"
We do need more babies to populate the universe and that has nothing to do with religion. Also, I'm disgusted by people who support population control. Assholes, each one of them.You talk about China?
We do need more babies to populate the universe and that has nothing to do with religion. Also, I'm disgusted by people who support population control. Assholes, each one of them.
We do need more babies to populate the universe and that has nothing to do with religion. Also, I'm disgusted by people who support population control. Assholes, each one of them.
why is it standart? because reproduction is one of the main functions of the living organism... or in Gayropean schools teachers are not telling it?Genes are selfish and thus bent on reproduction, individual organisms are necessarily not. It's funny you should be making fun of "Gayropean" school teachers when your understanding (and therefore, your education) of the matter is so primitive. A six year old European kid would have the same level of insight on this matter as you. Homosexuality is completely natural. Saying "reproduction is one of the main functions of the living organisms" just underlines how little you really know about organisms, life, and how it came to be and how it continues to be.
Ehhhh.
Don't be so rude with him ! :shock:
Remember that internet is breaking the walls of cultures from the countries.
Every country is at a different degree of development, and has a different way of thinking.
Every country has his own way to manage it.
Step by step a global world-culture is growing up.
But we are still far from it.
The one who has already learnt a lesson should teach to the others and not screaming on them :)
GO SUPPORT the Enlightenment ideas !
The logic and individual liberty of thinking (anathema of religions) must expand.
We do need more babies to populate the universe and that has nothing to do with religion. Also, I'm disgusted by people who support population control. Assholes, each one of them.
By jerking off into the air. It is scientifically proven that sperm can survive vacuum, extreme cold and travel vast distances trough space. Life on Earth started when our alien ancestor sprayed a massive load in the general direction of our planet.
Europe does not have a problem with overpopulation, that's probably why they don't control it...
Europe doesn't currently have a problem with overpopulation. However, accepting the harmless natural developments that will limit population growth is important. Many European countries don't control their population closely. But some still insist on controlling it towards the other direction. Like Spain for instance.If anything, Europe has a problem with under population. Europeans aren't having enough children, which is why immigrants are necessary for most European countries to even maintain their economies.
If anything, Europe has a problem with under population. Europeans aren't having enough children, which is why immigrants are necessary for most European countries to even maintain their economies.
What would those babies accomplish that immigrants don't ?Ideally being raised as part of the countries population, being properly educated, being a support to the society.
how many countries with population control in Europe? europeans just have some other ideals in their mind and its became a bit less popular to have child\-ren NOT because of understaing the situation with population in the world.
control over the population has nothing to do with moral. maybe only changing the ideas inside moral... i'll not say that is good or bad for the world... its just so.(click to show/hide)
By jerking off into the air. It is scientifically proven that sperm can survive vacuum, extreme cold and travel vast distances trough space. Life on Earth started when our alien ancestor sprayed a massive load in the general direction of our planet.
Ideally being raised as part of the countries population, being properly educated, being a support to the society.
Realistically and unfortunately that's not always the case though.
What would those babies accomplish that immigrants don't ?Ùh.... what?
Ùh.... what?
Do you have troubles understanding lexically, syntactically and semantically correct English sentences ?No, but apparently you do.
Ùh.... what?
No, but apparently you do.
What would those babies accomplish that immigrants don't ?
What kind of a question is that? Why are you quoting my post when asking it? It's a complete non sequitur to what I said.
Mmh, yes now that I re-read your sentence I think I deduced a little bit too much from it. I understood your message was that immigrants should not be necessary hence Europe should have more children. Which is not strictly what you had written. Although of course saying that Europe is underpopulated is a little bit silly in my opinion.http://www.pop.org/content/fertility-decline-in-western-europe-1727
Population decline isn't equal to underpopulation.Ants are insects.
A gentle decrease wouldnt be the worst thing in the world,
Maybe not the worst, but it will be pretty bad, in my country with current population growth rate in 25 or so years there'll be more retired ppl than those in productive age which will bring colapse of budget.
You can't just flee forward forever and expect that to work.