DedSec @lAccessDeniedINope, you can't jump on a button press. Seems like the decided to use the AC-system... :?
@colinj_graham <\[Is there a jump button? Or will it be like AC?]>\ [Messege sent]
colin graham @colinj_graham
Folgen
@lAccessDeniedI it's contextual, no need to press a jump button
12:38 AM - 7 Apr 2014
The cars have a cockpit view \o/
...makes me happy :)
First off, it's optional. Secondly, they argued that a cockpit view was asked for by the "community" and that it fits well with the flow of the game.
Makes me a happy Panda cuz cockpit view is always superior when driving.
Finally I'll have something to play on this goddamn PS4 that's just been gathering dust.
Will pirate it when it comes out :mrgreen:
May purchase later if not shit
Looks interesting, gonna pirate it, will buy if I find it gud enoughYou're getting old? Dementia? Alzheimer? What is it? 8-)
Why I never ever buy consoles upon release. I only recently got a PS3 like 6 months ago.
It's true that out of 90% of the computers that are embedded systems, almost none have strong security measures. Another example : some insulin pumps can be hacked remotely, which means you can kill a diabetic person that way.Pacemakers can also be remotely hacked...
I think ive dived like 10 hours or so into this sofar.
It does start feeling slightly repetitive, but nothing too bad. Good game, but definately nothing groundbreaking or revolutionary here. The weaponselection is significantly lamer than i expected tbh. All the guns are extremely basic. And there are only 2 supressed guns in the game. One being completely useless and the other being a pistol, that does a moderate job I suppose. Also the skilltree is a big downer. I think i was barely even half way into the game when I got the ones i considered important. Most of the skills are quite lame. Like the "switch your weapons faster" skill or the "drive better on dirt" skill, which is pointless cause 90% of the time u are on the city streets. But other then those, the game is quite solid.
NO NO NO NO Why Ubisoft? WHY?I am at Uni atm, so I haven't had the chance to check it out myself but I found this:
Aim assist that you can't turn off? Mouse acceleration that you can't turn off? What the fuck are you thinking?
Case and point: I am aiming where I know an enemies head will appear, sure enough, he pops his little head up and the aim assist goes "OH, you want to aim at this guy, here, let me aim at his crotch for you!" and moves my aim. Now instead of shooting the guy in the head, I'm aiming at his well protected crotch that's behind a wall. Bloody hell, I'm aiming where I want to bloody aim.
I've checked the settings for aim assist - It's got "Minimal - Default - Strong". NO! I don't want it, it's a fucking load of wank! I have less control with it on! Let me turn it off. And there are literally no settings for mouse acceleration that I've found.
I really want to give this game a chance but having played an hour and I am getting shot to shit because I can't take enemies down thanks to aim "assist". Even on consoles, while I'm using a controller I want the damned rubbish off!
Ack. Had to rant. I'm sorry.
Its kinda of an average generic revengestory. Dont take it the wrong way. Its okay, but again nothing new. The wierd part is that im actually really into it and i dont understand why. Its nothing new, but for some strange reason I am really hyped to see what happens next. I do really like the characters thou. I suppose thats the reason. The story may be predictable, but the interesting characters keep popping up the more u move forward. Kinda like in FC3 where u keep working for or with different nutjubs that were just so darn memorable.
Bleh so far.. this game is incredibly underwhelming and the whole drama aspect of the story feels too try hard like the writers are taking themselves too seriously.
Uhh so is it me or are cops fucking IMPOSSIBLE to lose? I have the jam coms app or whatever but I can't figure out how to use it.. it's supposed to be an app on the phone but it's not there...?
Loosing cops is pretty difficult which I like. Hacking the streetlights gives you a good amount of distance most of the times to turn into some side street and hide in the car.
Underwhelming is the performance on my pc. That's a way bigger issue. It's not running smoothly for me :(
Wut card and what settings are u using?ATI unfortunately. Even on the lowest it's not running smooth :(
ATI unfortunately. Even on the lowest it's not running smooth :(
I'll wait for patches.
Yup. I'm running a modest i7 3770, Radeon 6870, 16GB 1600 MHz RAM, 2x7200 RPM WD Blue in RAID 0 @ 1440x900 and I have to put pretty much everything on low for the game to run relatively smoothly.I have the same gfx card :|
So... is GTAV coming to the P.C. or what?
I guess Rockstar doesn't need my money.
Ubi announced a PC patch which is supposed to "improve the PC experience".
We'll see...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Only thing he's right with is how the gaming industry in recent times have a fetish for anti-heroes as main characters and there's few if even any Superman-esque heroes nowadays who fights for pure good etc..
So those 100 hours playing Ubisoft betatesters are extremely potential hackers and vigilanties? Go figure...(click to show/hide)
there's few if even any Superman-esque heroes nowadays who fights for pure good etc..Because those are boring, childish and one dimensional.
Because those are boring, childish and one dimensional.
Because those are boring, childish and one dimensional.
Pure good/evil?
Are you serious, LordBerenger?
Not very often, because like I said, those are childish. There's a reason why "pure good" superheroes are marketed only to children. Adults generally don't want unrealistic naïve heroes. "Pure good" doesn't exist.
Anti-hero characters have been done to death. How often have you seen a good AAA game where you're a pure good guy in recent times? Even pure evil guy (which is even less and almost non-existant).
Not very often, because like I said, those are childish. There's a reason why "pure good" superheroes are marketed only to children. Adults generally don't want unrealistic naïve heroes. "Pure good" doesn't exist.
Not very often, because like I said, those are childish. There's a reason why "pure good" superheroes are marketed only to children. Adults generally don't want unrealistic naïve heroes. "Pure good" doesn't exist.
Because those are boring, childish and one dimensional.
Only if they're done in a tasteless, crappy and vanilla kind of way.
Anti-hero characters have been done to death. How often have you seen a good AAA game where you're a pure good guy in recent times? Even pure evil guy (which is even less and almost non-existant).
Entertainment doesn't mean it can't be realistic.
I think the Dark Knight was the worst film of the three. Actually liked Batman Begins the most.
Using the Joker and Batman isn't the best choice. There are several "universe" where the characters partly differ in very important ways from each other. Reducing Joker like that is not possible in any of them, tbh.
Ignore the nerd D: Carry on.(click to show/hide)
Take the dark knight for an example. Remove the "hero" aspect of it for a bit inside your head, hell maybe watch it like that. What do you get? A boring action flick that was done a hundred times over.
This. Man of Steel has the same problem. Nolan's movies are largely shite anyway.
This is what I really liked about it though, the backstory part. He's not just some spoiled rich bastard with some problems in his head at this point going Vigilante.
That's the worst part about that movie. Action scenes in it were sweet tho. But story about rich kid who lost his parents, went to shaolin monastery or whatever to become a better person is bollocks. Rich kids are by definition in 100% cases spoiled bastards with no soul who compensate by acting "spiritual". Anyone who tries to sell me a story where rich kid cares about world he's living in and hasn't yet performed suicide is lying son of a bitch.
He nails a lot of things.
like ur mom?huehuehue
I think it's one of his better reviews. He nails a lot of things.
You know you are piece of useless shit when an 80 years old dude with walking cane strangles you to death one handed...Wut?
Wut?
(click to show/hide)
I think it's one of his better reviews. He nails a lot of things.
You mean the old guy drawing a piercing weapon from the top of his crane and then stabbing into the throat of the young guy?
You know you are piece of useless shit when an 80 years old dude with walking cane strangles you to death one handed...
In my opinion Zero Punctuation videos are terrible reviews, if you take them as a review anyway. It's very funny, I enjoyed watching all of them, but not even one was a good review. For starters, a good review would not concentrate on commenting the scenario of a game, as things can hardly get more subjective than that.
You mean the old guy drawing a piercing weapon from the top of his crane and then stabbing into the throat of the young guy?
Seems like someone turned off a bunch of features on the PC version but someone found out and reactivated stuff.
Maybe to make it look not too good on PC to avoid making consoles look bad? Could that really happen?
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=390114 (http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=390114)
The implications for a full industry if those "pay to look worse"-theories are true... :cry:
Ok just finished it, and i'm kinda satisfied by it; the game is fun, graphics are absolutely not next gen, that is true, but it still looks good.
now i don't really get if my standards got extremely lowered, but as i said, i enjoyed the game; even though the story was typical retarded american plot (still catchy if you ask me), and the hacking is uber unrealistic (which doesn't necessarily mean a bad thing), i see this as a game that finally proposes something new and original, and being it new often means it's not perfect; this new way of taking care of chases, the well balanced stealth/action combat, side missions that have potentials, the modern chicago setting: this is a generally good game imo.
honestly if i had to choose which of these three helped the "gaming cause" the most,Dishonored, Bioshock Infinite (both considered good games) and Watch Dogs i'd definitely say the latter. developers said it's going to be turned into a franchise, which again, i believe it should be a good thing; the problem is it's a ubisoft franchise, which usually means a bad thing; just like assassin's creed, this is a game with potential, it is normal it has flaws, a lot, being it something new, but the fundamental idea it's rightly placed imo, it just need to be polished, a lot maybe, but i believe it's on the right rails.
The implications for a full industry if those "pay to look worse"-theories are true... :cry: