Due to it being blunt, I thought the point of the warhammer was to kick the crap out of armored targets? If you want to kill lightly armored targets then slashing is much much better. Blunt ignores armor even more then pierce.
imho the warhammer is amazing.
I was using it on my strength 1h character and nobody survived more than 2 hits, except for allers and equivalent 11 IF+ players.
Also if you get knockdown you instantly win the fight. Nobody can survive after being knocked down by it, I don't care who they are. The three hit combo is just too hard hitting.
I thought the same thing at first, but I've been using a Mighty one since the last reset and it lost its luster for me.It is just that there are more strength leaning builds surviving more hits.
It is just that there are more strength leaning builds surviving more hits.
Imagine if you had a wimpy little Italian sword. They'd be taking way more hits.
Just like tears said, you are better off using a slashing weapon against anyone in 50 or less armor. Warhammer is either a tincan killer or support weapon when you have teammates around. I probably get 15-25% knockdown rate when using it, giving me and my teammates LOTS of extra free hits against downed opponents.
How is it a tincan killer now?
Every weapon interrupts, the allure of the Warhammer originally was that it lands a hit every time, and it could knock down an enemy.
Now its just a super short, low (but consistent!) damage weapon that may allow you to get an extra free swing, that is slow as F.
After using it for months I find even unheirloomed weapons are better than the Warhammer, which for sake of realism should hurt quite a bit with or without armour, especially in the face.
Run of the Mill Tincan 24 STR, 8 IF, 75 HP Transitional Plate: 53 armor Plate Mittens: 10 Armor Total Body Armor: 63 | STR: 18 PS: 6 WPF: 125 Warhammer: 31b Avg Dmg: 18 High Dmg: 29 Low: Dmg: 7 Average hits required to kill target: 5 | STR: 18 PS: 6 WPF: 125 Elite Scimitar: 31c Avg Dmg: 10 High Dmg: 21 Low: Dmg: 0 Average hits to kill target: 8 |
Heirloomed Tincan 24 STR, 8 IF, 75 HP Total Body Armor: 63+14= 77 armor | STR: 18 PS: 6 WPF: 125 Warhammer: 31b Avg Dmg: 12 High Dmg: 23 Low: Dmg: 0 Average hits to kill target: 7 | STR: 18 PS: 6 WPF: 125 Elite Scimitar: 31c Avg Dmg: 7 High Dmg: 14 Low: Dmg: 0 Average hits to kill target: 11 |
Run of the Mill Tincan
24 STR, 8 IF, 75 HP
Transitional Plate: 53 armor
Plate Mittens: 10 Armor
Total Body Armor: 63STR: 18
PS: 6
WPF: 125
Warhammer: 31b
Avg Dmg: 18
High Dmg: 29
Low: Dmg: 7
Average hits required to kill target: 5STR: 18
PS: 6
WPF: 125
Elite Scimitar: 31c
Avg Dmg: 10
High Dmg: 21
Low: Dmg: 0
Average hits to kill target: 8Heirloomed Tincan
24 STR, 8 IF, 75 HP
Total Body Armor: 63+14= 77 armorSTR: 18
PS: 6
WPF: 125
Warhammer: 31b
Avg Dmg: 12
High Dmg: 23
Low: Dmg: 0
Average hits to kill target: 7STR: 18
PS: 6
WPF: 125
Elite Scimitar: 31c
Avg Dmg: 7
High Dmg: 14
Low: Dmg: 0
Average hits to kill target: 11
so besides doing close to double the dmg of an equivilent cut weapon, I dont know about you but I dont have all day to try and hit a tincan 8-11 times with a cut weapon to kill them. They will have friends show up before that.
Iberian Mace gets results you stupid chief! I think the Warhammer needs a little love. The mace for the money is a much better propersition.
Did anyone say MACE?!?!?
I fucking love the Winged Mace. Whacking tincans right and left, BOOYAH!
Sorry dude, you are dead wrong. Anyone attacking tincans with a sword is stupid.
The shitslapper fucking owns if you buff it it will become op
Warhammer isnt what it used to be, I now also swap to italian sword it feels far more effective, sure the old tin can takes 2 more hits to take down but at least it feels fast and I can keep some distance.
Warhammer just aint what it used to be...
I think warhammer and mil hammer should both get +1 speed.
You think anyone would notice?