Author Topic: Light Armour Heirlooms  (Read 2299 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Armbrust_Schtze

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 72
  • Infamy: 110
  • cRPG Player
  • (being watched)
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Philip :)
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2011, 01:54:54 pm »
0
dont cry, if you love an armor you loom it, no matter it only brings +4 armor.

ps: my hardened blue hose is awesome.
This masterwork bolt will send you straight to hell Tincan!

Offline Old_Sir_Agor

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 85
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: DenBitre_Sir_Agor
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2011, 02:24:41 pm »
0
also think that this 3 armor dont give to agi/ranged charcters really much, all what we need is 40 armor +-5 from armor and gloves to survive arbalest shoot from distance.
shooting at people from a reachable place as last man standing is not delaying. Even if you're on the other side of the map.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2011, 11:56:59 pm »
+2
ive yet to see a good argument against giving light armour the same loom benefit as every other armour... the best light armour will still give less body armour than the worst medium armour even if you get +7 to the light from looming. so stop this needless hate against light armours... give a tiny bit more incentive not to run around in a tin can suit.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #33 on: October 08, 2011, 02:44:41 am »
0
ive yet to see a good argument against giving light armour the same loom benefit as every other armour... the best light armour will still give less body armour than the worst medium armour even if you get +7 to the light from looming. so stop this needless hate against light armours... give a tiny bit more incentive not to run around in a tin can suit.


Light armor already is a better choice than medium/heavy armor for overall convenience. It doesn't need that.

Offline Cyclopsided

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 513
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Formerly "Marathon". #sluttiestAdmin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Cyclopsided_of_Chaos, CYBD, Brunchlady
  • IRC nick: Cyclopsided
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #34 on: October 08, 2011, 08:07:07 am »
+1

Light armor already is a better choice than medium/heavy armor for overall convenience. It doesn't need that.
wat
Also, I have declared myself #1 NA hybrid thrower
Formerly known as Marathon.
As an NA admin, I am the most laid back and concerned with the ~fun of the game~ above all other factors. I've also been super inactive since Summer 2012. University takes most of my time, but I still find some time to play when i can.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #35 on: October 08, 2011, 10:19:39 am »
0
yeah cause you know, 99% of level 25+ chars dont roll around in tunic over mail or better... obviously light armour is amazing and thats why its so popular that 1% of higher level chars use it. maybe less than 1% if you dont include joke builds and STFs who spent all their 10k on a wep... oh and take archers out of considering and you are left with even less...

Offline Old_Sir_Agor

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 85
  • Infamy: 65
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: DenBitre_Sir_Agor
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #36 on: October 08, 2011, 11:17:05 am »
0
btw i also dont loom my body armor(padded armor) because dont want to spend 3 gen for this, i will just go lvl 31+ earn some gold and maybe buy it later or loom points.
shooting at people from a reachable place as last man standing is not delaying. Even if you're on the other side of the map.

Offline Gisbert_of_Thuringia

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 169
  • Infamy: 136
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild
  • Game nicks: Guard_Gisbert_of_Thuringia, Guard_Bernulf_of_Thuringia, Guard_Ranulf_of_Thuringia etc...
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #37 on: October 08, 2011, 12:01:28 pm »
0
I also know some guys with 3x loomed light armour.

Don't know if it's worth it, they say yes, I don't agree. I think it doesn't make much difference as an archer whether you have 25 or 28 body armour, you are still 1-2 hit kill^^

But light armours shouldn't get +7 with 3rd loom. That's why they are light ;)
« Last Edit: October 08, 2011, 12:15:27 pm by Gisbert_of_Thuringia »

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #38 on: October 08, 2011, 12:40:19 pm »
0
Khergit Lamellar Vest, weighing 4.5 pounds more than Studded Leather Coat (heaviest armor to get Reinforced), gets the Lordly bonus. Meanwhile, Peasant Dress, weighing 4.5 pounds less than Studded Leather Coat gets exactly the same bonus as it. Seems off to me somehow. Same weight difference between Studded Leather Coat/Peasant Dress and Studded Leather Coat/Khergit Lamellar Vest, yet the Dress gets exactly the same armor bonus as the Leather. This also goes upwards, with the 20 LB armors getting the same bonus as a Khergit Lamellar Vest instead of a yet greater one based on weight.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #39 on: October 10, 2011, 11:43:49 am »
0
obviously whoever is responsible for fucking over light armour is racist and hates people who have the balls not to prance around in metal armour.

i petition we change the name of the heirloom stages for light armour...

examples...

Hardened vomit stained Blue Gambeson: 22armour
Padded toilet paper Blue Gambeson: 23 armour
Piece of Cloth wrapped around Blue Gambeson: 25armour

Offline Ylca

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 183
  • Infamy: 68
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LLJK
  • Game nicks: YlcaTheTerrible, YlcaTheJuggler
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #40 on: October 10, 2011, 12:12:45 pm »
0
Honestly, rather than more armor I'd like to see light armor get lighter with loom points. Heavy armor is about brute protection, light armor is about keeping speed so what if each loom point dropped weight?

I'm thinking .25, .25 .5 for a total of 1 pound dropped off most light armors.

To beat people to the punch, yes 1 pound of weight is significant to the point of being noticeable (at least in terms of running).

Offline rustyspoon

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 794
  • Infamy: 164
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rustyspoon, Sir_Rusty_Of_Spoon, Rusty_the_Spoonarian
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #41 on: October 10, 2011, 12:29:45 pm »
0
ive yet to see a good argument against giving light armour the same loom benefit as every other armour... the best light armour will still give less body armour than the worst medium armour even if you get +7 to the light from looming. so stop this needless hate against light armours... give a tiny bit more incentive not to run around in a tin can suit.

Totally agree. Currently it doesn't make much sense.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Snoozer

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 91
  • Infamy: 58
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Faction:Knights Hospitaller
    • View Profile
Re: Light Armour Heirlooms
« Reply #42 on: October 11, 2011, 11:09:55 am »
0
i  agree as well

i understand why certain weapon have stat differences in their looms, some require weight to be effective or speed best off their natural purpose (like blunt and axe require more weight while a sword requires more speed for example)


but armor is all the same they have one purpose....to protect you

there IS a sacrifice for protection vs speed but looms should be the same for armor seeing how ALL armor has the same purpose just some reflect speed while others reflect sheer protection therefore the wearer looses speed
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Good Bye Lost Legion R.I.P Q_Q