Appearently you guys dont get it.
Long Spears ARE viable in 1vs1 ... noone ever declined that BUT:
If 2 players of the same skill level would duel, one with Long Spear, one with some random polearm/2h/whatever ... who do you think will win?!
If you lose against a Long Spear in Duel its simply that your enemy is better then you and would pwn you even harder with some proper polearm. So its the fault of your lack of skill and not the fault of a "Overpowered Long Spear" (LOL!) ...
Reasons are obvious:
- Only thrust and overhead swing, which can't be feinted ... or at least not very effectivly coz of pretty low speed compared to other weapons.
- It is slow, Sure, it is fast enough to reply an attack after you blocked successfully but thats all, you never ever can spam someone with a Long Spear, if he blocked your first attack unless he is a complete noob. Sure I can already hear the whine: Mimimi, I can stun lock someone if I poke him in the back! Its redicilious fast! BLAH! .... -> Some news for you! other weapons can as well stunlock someone from behind! and that even way faster and with more dmg! cewl eh? ...
- Good chance to just bounce if enemy is too close, the ground stab glitch doesnt work always + you can be spamed easier than with other weapons.
At Linx: Sure lets balance the game around one guy, who maybe is able to beat ppl with a logn spear in duel! the reason could never be that he is just better then you (and maybe me, dunno, dont know him)
Long Spear should be supposed to be a free win in 1vs1 situations regardless of which skill the player have and if he is a lvl 1 peasant or not! ... very good idea! ... NOT!