lol wtf is that supposed to mean? foreigners took away your romantic picture of the past?
'Foreigners' didn't take away the peaceful ethnostate, our policy makers did. With no popular support changing centuries old nations for all time without referendum.
It's also not romanticized, mass non-western immigration didn't get out of control before the 80s so I'm old enough to still remember the time before. As are anyone who are older than me. We all remember it well.
Scandinavian society had less crime, corruption, decadence and degeneracy before the culture revolution of the 60s. The 'Scandinavia in 1950s' video is the world before postmodernism and the loss of culture in the 60s and the loss of homogeneous societies from the 80s and onwards. Scandinavia in the 1950s looks like something from a different planet by now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-hIVnmUdXM
Yes, I watched this before, it's a good conversation. I quite like Camille Paglia despite her incessant 'mkay's.
The cultural marxism has spread from the litterature departments to most of the other humanities by now. Even in Denmark where a friend of mine and former fellow history student at the University of Copenhagen has a forced 'gender contructions' course this whole semester, where they have to listen to 'gender historians' speaking about 'women's history', 'the history of emotions' (the source material is women's magazines from the 80s) and Foucault's poststructuralism and post-hermeneutics. They even have a transgender teacher from the gender studies department come and lecture them about 'practical queer theory' and 'normativity critique' in the last week. I read some of his/her/xir/xe articles and it's the usual postmodernist, anti-hierarchical, anti-western, anti-white, anti-male, anti-heterosexual victim narrative that those types love, written in vague, bloated 'academic' language that is popular in Critical Theory going back to the Frankfurt School. Imagine what that semester could've been used for instead by the history department.
