What's interesting to me is that because of the nature of forums, there's a selection effect -- the majority of posters, especially active ones, have at least 100 IQ. Then once in a while, as sort of a hero of the underrepresented retards, someone like Ras appears, who's just genuinely dumb. Being as stupid as a bag of rocks isn't his only or even biggest problem, but I still find it fascinating.
I wish there was a mandatory IQ test before you were allowed to go on the internet, and then you had to keep the score visible. I'm legitimately curious about the IQ of people like Ras. Is that what 90 IQ looks like? 80? 70? Or even 60? For example, here we have someone who has an essentially infinite amount of examples of - if not perfect, at least CONSIDERABLY better - grammar but he simply doesn't have the faculties to connect the dots. "Should I use a thousand exclamation marks? What about random spaces? How do paragraphs work? Hell, I don't know, there's just no way for me to learn!"
Of course, I suspect in a mind like his learning isn't exactly a top priority, so naturally he doesn't think like that, but that's what I find so curious about it. I have no idea if you become incapable of what I consider basic comprehension at 90 or 80 IQ or what.
Ras, would you mind telling us your (real) IQ, buddy? I promise I'll stop making fun of you if you do.
