Which are you more excited about/see yourself playing?

[Penitent]

With NA all but faded and EU always close on its heels, I always hear people talking about the above two games as the next hope for the community.

This poll is just for curiosities' sake.  I hope we can all be one again, someday.

Love,
Me

[Zeus_]

For Honor, then OKaM

[McKli_PL]

Anything don't really care, if it will be a chadz game, kebap game or others game doesn't matter, only thing is important for me is how this game will be great and epic in multiplayer environment.

[Molly]

OKAM cuz I have money riding on it

...seriously, I want those $$$!

[Asheram]

I'm sure I will buy both, but with bannerlords keeping the same combat mechanics and okam using stances I will probably lean more to bannerlord(which hopefully wil have a crpgesque mod hot on its heels).

[Nickleback]

Bannerlord of course,okam looks shit yet.

[Taser]

For the moment, both.

However both have a lot of promises and aren't close to release yet. I can see myself getting lost in bannerlord as a single player game and OKAM as a multiplayer one. Especially if OKAM's stance combat is fun.

[Malaclypse]

I can see myself getting lost in bannerlord as a single player game and OKAM as a multiplayer one.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

[Kadeth]

I see myself playing whichever game has better combat, I think this will be the case for most players.

[HappyPhantom]

I see myself playing whichever game has better combat, I think this will be the case for most players.

But Kadeth, don't you have best combat?

[Switchtense]

Not entirely sure.

Bannerlords definitely for Singleplayer. OKaM's combat feels fresh and a lot different to Warband.
But I myself am not a huge fan of the stance combat.

So depending on how the actual released versions will be combat wise, that one I would also stick to in Multiplayer.

[Teeth]

If Bannerlord goes a similar route as Warband multiplayer pub balance wise I'll be done with that turdfest in 30 hours. I know the combat system of Bannerlord will be good, but I am unsure about their other design decisions. For OKAM its the other way around, I have way more faith in their balance decisions, but I am not sure if they will pull off the combat system. So, the only thing I am really excited about as of now is playing the what appears to be much more polished Mount & Blade singleplayer in Bannerlord.

[Penitent]

Just as I feared, the community is somewhat split.  Oh well -- a healthy interest for both games is expected.

I'm leaning heavily towards Okam, since I love the devs and have faith in them.  One might even say loyal.  CRPG was a masterpiece in that it's the only game i've played so consistently for so many years in all my life.  However, the devs were limited by so much.  I can't wait to see what they do once they can spread their wings a bit.

[Golem]

Bannerlord for singleplayer and wrecking noobs in MP, and OKAM for commanding NPCs and getting rekt by scrubs.

@Teeth I personally think that there is like 1 or 2 features they might want to add to the current combat system, polish the netcode as much as possible and if they released it at that stage, it would pretty much be the best and most  complete longsword and polearm simulator/game to-date. But that's just my opinion.

[The_Bloody_Nine]

A question to those who said you don't like the 'stances-combat', did you play it or is your opinion just based on the description of it?